Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
London Underground
Category 1 Standard
MAYOR OF LONDON
Title: Civil Engineering - Bridge Structures
Number: 1-051
Issue no: A4
Issue date: July 2010
Contents
1 Purpose _______________________________________________________________________ 3
2 Scope _________________________________________________________________________ 4
3 Requirements ___________________________________________________________________ 5
3.1 Inception and design ________________________________________________________ 5
3.2 Construction, installation, testing and commissioning______________________________ 16
3.3 Inspection _______________________________________________________________ 17
3.4 Analytical assessment ______________________________________________________ 25
3.5 Condition assessment and certification _________________________________________ 37
3.6 Maintenance _____________________________________________________________ 39
3.7 Strengthening and renewal __________________________________________________ 39
3.8 Decommissioning _________________________________________________________ 39
3.9 Evidence of compliance ____________________________________________________ 40
4 Responsibilities _________________________________________________________________ 40
5 Supporting information ___________________________________________________________ 41
5.1 Background ______________________________________________________________ 41
5.2 Safety considerations ______________________________________________________ 41
5.3 Environmental considerations ________________________________________________ 41
5.4 Customer considerations____________________________________________________ 42
6 References ____________________________________________________________________ 42
6.1 References ______________________________________________________________ 42
6.2 Abbreviations_____________________________________________________________ 45
6.3 Definitions _______________________________________________________________ 45
6.4 Technical content manager __________________________________________________ 49
6.5 Document history _________________________________________________________ 49
7 Attachments ___________________________________________________________________ 51
7.1 Standard severity photographs _______________________________________________ 51
7.2 Partial factors ____________________________________________________________ 55
7.3 Unit weights of materials ____________________________________________________ 59
7.4 Sub-surface loading category ________________________________________________ 60
7.5 Surcharge loadings for the assessment of Earth Retaining Walls ____________________61
7.6 Main girders restrained by U-frames ___________________________________________ 62
7.7 Loadings specified for LU owned footbridges, cable bridges and gantries ______________ 65
7.8 Accidental loading – railways ________________________________________________ 66
7.9 Permissible stresses in cast iron ______________________________________________ 67
7.10 Fatigue assessment of railway bridges _________________________________________ 68
7.11 Pipe crossings under track __________________________________________________ 69
7.12 Parapet walls _____________________________________________________________ 70
7.13 RL and RU loading ________________________________________________________ 71
7.14 Condition assessment and certification diagram for bridges and structures _____________72
1 Purpose
1.1 The purpose of this Standard is to define the whole life cycle requirements for Bridge
Structure assets. These assets comprise:
a) Rail bridges;
This category of structure covers structures owned by LU carrying LU tracks,
including:
I) Underbridge;
II) Overbridge;
III) Viaduct;
IV) Girdering;
V) Way beam.
b) Highway bridges
This category of structure covers structures owned by LU carrying public or private
road traffic, including:
I) Overbridge;
II) Viaduct.
c) Footbridges;
d) Underground structures;
This category of structure covers:
I) Covered Ways;
II) Subsurface tunnels (i.e. cut and cover brick arch tunnel);
II) Subways;
IV) Culverts.
e) Earth retaining walls, including gabions;
f) Ancillary structures and components;
This category of structure covers:
I) Cable bridges;
II) Pipe bridges;
III) Pipe crossings over / under track;
IV) Signal gantries, these are metal framed structures carrying a signal or
signals. Signal posts and signal access ladders and hoops do not form
part of the civil asset responsibility;
V) Gantries over railway;
VI) Crash barriers;
VII) Longitudinal Timbers.
1.2 In defining requirements specifically applicable to assets, this Standard complements
Standard 1-050 (Civil Engineering - Common Requirements) that defines mandatory
requirements generally applicable to all Civil Engineering assets including the Bridge
Structure assets.
1.3 A supporting Manual of Good Practice G-051 gives guidance and explanation on
Bridge Structure assets.
Note: Structural elements of stations within tunnels are included in LU Standard 1-055 (Civil
Engineering - Deep Tube Tunnels and Shafts)
Station platform finishes, tolerances tactile warning strips and safety markings are
included in LU Standard 1-131 (Premises – Station Platforms)
Ladders and Step Iron requirements for drainage installations are included within LU
Standard 1-052 (Civil Engineering – Gravity Drainage Systems)
2 Scope
2.1 This Standard applies to Bridge Structure assets owned by LU.
2.2 This Standard defines the requirements for assets through the following lifecycle
stages:
3 Requirements
Note: The Required Duty for Bridge Structure assets as defined in the Foundation
Document (Bridges and Structures) is as follows:
1.1 Maintain inherent structural integrity (support itself so as not to suffer complete or
partial collapse).
1.2 Maintain the ability to carry without restriction any permitted applied static and
dynamic design loads.
1.3 Maintain the planned design envelope and adequate clearance to permit the safe
passage of rail vehicles.
1.4 Provide appropriate access and egress for all planned uses (including Maintenance),
and for reasonably anticipated emergency uses.
1.5 Sustain a Condition and state so as not to cause unplanned interruption to, or
restriction of, any aspect of the operating railway; this includes externally sourced
wear or damage which is greater than that currently accepted for the asset.
1.6 Sustain a Condition and state so as to maintain all interfacing non-railway services
and facilities at full design capability.
2.1 Minimise the degradation of all interfacing assets (e.g. as evidenced through
Maintenance cycles). This includes interfaces with the railway and adjacent
infrastructure (e.g. track, structures, stations and premises).
2.2 Minimise the degradation of all interfacing assets which support non-railway services
or facilities (e.g. as evidenced through Maintenance cycles). This includes interfaces
with dynamic & static assets (e.g. roads, buildings, walkways, etc).
Ensure the asset does not cause undue degradation of interfacing assets, disruption
to railway operations or unacceptable environmental nuisance.
4.1 Asset minimises the likelihood and consequence of asset abuse. Asset abuse
encompasses, vandalism, planned/unplanned work, damage due to external event,
etc.
4.2 Asset minimises the likelihood of occurrence of, and enhances the ability to respond
to, personal attack on passengers or staff.
Minimise environmental impact and demands at all stages in the lifecycle; this
includes effects now and into the future, including successive refurbishment, final
decommissioning, and disposal routes.
Ensure the asset functions within the framework defined by legislation (including
environmental); regulatory guidance; LU, Infraco and applicable national and
international standards; and LU and Infraco policies.
8.1 Ensure safe operation and Condition as specified by LU requirements; this includes
passengers, employees and members of the general public.
8.3 Safeguard the health and safety of passengers, employees and members of the
general public.
Provide all aspects of the Required Duty within the defined LU requirements.
3.1.1.2 Bridge Structure assets shall be designed to the principles of asset management
planning.
3.1.2 Inception
All proposals for new works, including Strengthening and Renewal, made by Suppliers
to LU shall be initiated and controlled in accordance with LU Standard 1-538 and 1-
050.
3.1.4.2 The maximum practicable lateral clearances shall be provided from structural
supports to the railway track.
3.1.4.3 Unless the physical constraints of the location make it impractical, a clearance of 4.5
m shall be provided from structural supports to the nearest running rail.
3.1.4.4 Where a support is provided at a distance less than 4.5m from the nearest running
rail, the following shall apply:
3.1.6 Groundwater
The design shall take account of the following:
3.1.7.2 The Design Life of Way Beams shall be twice the estimated time of service of the Way
Beam.
3.1.8.2 The design shall meet the requirements for passive fire resistance to support the fire
safety strategy for the asset in LU Standard 1-083.
3.1.8.3 Main structural elements in sub-surface locations shall have a fire resistance of at
least 60 minutes.
3.1.8.4 Structural elements supporting buildings or which are part of evacuation routes shall
have a fire resistance as given in LU Standard 1-053.
3.1.9 Constructability
The structural effects of the intended methods of construction shall be taken into
account in the design.
3.1.11.2 Any conflicts between LU requirements and those requirements of the other
authorities shall be referred to LU.
3.1.12 Services
3.1.12.1 Provisions shall be made for:
d) Allowing for the movement of the structure without detrimental effect on the
services or utilities.
3.1.12.2 Cable locations and fixings requirements shall comply with LU Standard 1-120.
3.1.13 Drainage
Assets shall be designed to shed water and avoid the accumulation of water.
3.1.14.3 Footbridges
Pedestrian handrails on Footbridges shall comply with the loading requirements given
in Attachment 7.7. Where footbridges cross a railway with existing or proposed
overhead lines they must be a minimum of 1.5m above the surface of the bridge deck
with no footholds or projections on the inside face . Where the railway is electrified by
means other than overhead lines, the parapet must be a minimum of 1.25m above the
surface of the bridge deck with no footholds or projections on the inside face. Where
handrails are provided on the inside face, either the parapet must be raised 1.5m or
1.25m above the parapet as appropriate or the footbridge must be completely caged.
The parapet must be solid up to the height of the handrail.
Note 2: The Manual of Good Practice G-054 provides guidance on the use of gabion walls,
including design references and considerations of their use in the railway
environment.
Note 3: The Manual of Good Practice G-051 provides guidance on the specification clauses
relating to gabions.
Note: Burland et al defined ‘Slight’ as “Cracks easily filled. Redecorating probably required.
Several slight fractures showing inside of building. Cracks are visible externally and
some repainting may be required externally to ensure weather tightness. Doors and
windows may stick slightly.”
The approximate crack width (in masonry construction) was suggested at 5mm. The
limiting tensile strain 0.075% to 0.15%.
3.1.16 Loading
3.1.16.1 General
a) Loadings to be adopted in the design of assets shall be determined and applied
in accordance with the principles of Limit State design described in the relevant
British or European Standard except where an alternative approach is
described within this Standard.
b) Notwithstanding the loading conditions defined in this Standard, the Supplier
shall ensure that all loadings that may reasonably be identified as potentially
acting on the asset during its Design Life are addressed during the design
process so as to ensure that the Required Duty is achieved.
3.1.16.2 Permanent loading
a) Permanent loading, comprising structural Dead Loads and Superimposed Dead
Loads shall be calculated in accordance with relevant British or European
Standards, as appropriate using unit weights given in BS 648, or from the actual
known weights of the materials.
b) Cable loading requirements shall comply with LU Standard 1-120.
3.1.16.3 Live loading
a) Rail bridges
I) Assets supporting LU railway tracks shall be designed for RL loading, in
accordance with BS 5400: Part 2, except where a Train Operating
Company (TOC) has rights to operate over the LU railway tracks (see
Attachment 7.13).
II) Assets supporting LU railway tracks, where a TOC has rights to operate,
shall be designed for RU loading in accordance with BS 5400 Part 2 (see
Attachment 7.13).
III) Any support or other element of the structure types listed below that risks
either destruction or loss of carrying capacity when struck by an errant
rail vehicle shall be designed for collision loads and shall be capable of
surviving the Incident without partial collapse or significant permanent
damage or distortion.
i) railway Overbridges (crossing over the LU railway);
ii) road Overbridges (crossing over the LU railway);
iii) footbridges (crossing over the LU railway);
iv) any major structure spanning two or more LU railway tracks, but
not cable bridges or Ancillary Structures.
IV) Structural supports described in the previous sub-clause shall be
designed at the Ultimate Limit State (ULS) for the collision loads defined
in Attachment 7.8, using a partial load factor (γfl) of 1.0.
V) Collision loads shall be considered in conjunction with the associated
loads from the supported structure factored for the ULS.
b) Highway bridges
I) Highway Live Loadings shall be determined and applied in accordance
with the HA DMRB, BD 37/01.
II) The level of HB loading shall be agreed with the appropriate highway
authority.
III) Any support or other element of a structure which risks either destruction
or loss of carrying capacity when struck by a highway vehicle shall be
designed in accordance with HA DMRB, BD 60/04.
c) Footbridge loading
I) Pedestrian Live Loading shall be in accordance with Attachment 7.7.
Note: Where pedestrian loading could arise from stadium routes the Supplier should make
due allowance for abnormal Footbridge loading.
c) In calculating the railway traffic pressure and suction loads, the train shape
coefficient, k1, shall be taken as 1.0, the train speed coefficient vs shall be the
‘line speed’.
d) In deep level tube station platform areas, all structures, cladding, cladding
support frames and fixings of the same shall be designed to resist both
pressures and suctions of 0.2kN/m2 using a γf or γfl as appropriate of 1.0.
3.1.16.7 Loading for foundations, underground structures and earth retaining walls
a) The design shall consider all load and load effects that may reasonably be
expected to act on the structure during its Design Life.
Note: The loadings that should be considered in the design of foundations, sub-structures,
Underground Structures and Earth Retaining Walls are to include the relevant loads
imposed on these structures that result from the effects of:
c) the permanent dead and Superimposed Dead Loads of the structure, refer to Clause
3.1.17.2;
This list is not exhaustive and other items may be required on a case by case basis.
Table 1 - Partial load factors and dynamic factors for way beams
3.1.17.3 Footbridges
Partial load factors and load combinations shall be determined and applied in
accordance with HA DMRB, BD 37/01.
3.1.18 Durability
3.1.18.1 Assets shall be designed and specified in accordance with the requirement to achieve
the Design Life stated in Section 0 of this Standard.
3.1.18.2 The design shall include mitigating provisions to counter any adverse effects of the
physical and operational environment in which the asset will be required to operate.
3.1.18.3 Where structures are to be placed within 3 metres of LU conductor rails, the likelihood
of damage being caused due to stray electrical currents shall be assessed.
3.1.18.4 Where structures are to be placed in areas which contain 750V third-rail electrified
railways or 25kV overhead line electrified railways, the likelihood of damage being
caused by stray electrical currents should be assessed.
Note: Guidance on protection of structure against stray currents is given in Manual of Good
Practice G-053.
3.1.18.5 All metal structures and steel reinforcement in concrete that are prone to corrosion
due to stray electrical currents shall be earthed in accordance with LU Standard 1-
106.
3.1.19.2 As part of the design, the Supplier shall produce a plan for inspection, instrumentation,
measurement and Maintenance of the asset to ensure serviceability throughout the
Design Life.
Note: Also refer to LU Standard 1-354 and for spatial constraints refer to LU Standard 1-
371.
3.1.20.2 Any loads which Temporary Works impose on new assets shall be allowed for in the
design.
3.1.20.3 Existing assets which will be required to sustain loads imposed by the Temporary
Works associated with the construction of new assets shall be checked for their ability
to do so and if necessary, additional support shall be designed.
3.1.21.2 The Supplier shall have a process for checking and verifying design calculations.
3.2.1.3 No new or Strengthening and Renewal construction work shall start until the design
for that work has been approved in accordance with LU Standards 1-538 and 1-050.
3.2.1.4 A system to control and manage the construction process shall be maintained.
c) to satisfy itself that the construction is in accordance with the design; and
d) to satisfy itself in respect of the adequacy of the system for the recording of
construction data and information that may be relevant to the subsequent
Maintenance, Strengthening and Renewal and eventual decommissioning of the
Bridge Structure assets.
3.2.1.5 Procedures shall be in place for controlling any changes to the design during the
construction, installation, testing and commissioning phases including staged and
temporary construction work. Such procedures shall ensure that:
a) proposed design changes are not implemented until they have been duly
considered and approved by a person competent to appreciate their impact on
construction methodology and their implications for the safety of the operational
railway; and
b) records are made of the design changes and their approval.
3.2.1.6 At the end of construction the drawings shall record the works as built.
3.2.1.7 Adjacent buildings, structures, utilities and facilities shall be protected from the effects
of construction work in accordance with LU Standard 1-050.
3.2.1.8 Sufficient testing of systems, sub-systems, materials and components shall be carried
out to give assurance that they are in accordance with those specified in the approved
design.
3.2.1.9 All necessary attendance during site visits shall be afforded to LU to enable LU to
discharge its responsibilities in respect of its duties including verification.
3.2.1.10 Where appropriate to the scope of work, a design capability shall be made available
throughout construction to ensure and certify implementation of the design intent.
Note: Ensuring implementation of the design intent includes interpretation of monitoring data
and modification of the design if necessary.
3.2.2.2 Arrangements necessary to obtain permission to use sites for the intended purpose
for the duration of construction activity shall be made.
3.2.3.2 Before any modifications are made to a construction method the design shall be
checked and if necessary modified.
3.2.4 Materials
All construction materials supplied to the works shall comply with the requirements of
LU Standard 1-050.
a) verify the predictive ground movement and the effects which such ground
movement will have on LU and adjacent assets by measurement;
b) determine the impact on Outside Party assets in accordance with LU Standard
1-023;
c) establish monitoring base readings of the construction activity sufficiently in
advance to ensure underlying and seasonal environmental trends are
understood; and
d) implement contingency plans if the results of monitoring so indicates.
3.3 Inspection
3.3.1 General
3.3.1.1 Inspections shall be undertaken for the following purposes;
3.3.1.3 Any usage of assets or development of defects which might place at risk the
operational railway, interfacing facilities, passengers, staff or the public shall be
identified, made safe, recorded and brought to the immediate attention of LU.
3.3.1.4 The Asset Register for each asset shall be reviewed and the records updated as part
of the reporting process.
3.3.1.5 Inspection reports and proforma shall be retained for the life of the asset.
3.3.1.6 Inspections shall be preceded by a desk top study to establish as far as possible
information about the asset and likely hazards.
Note: Desk top studies may include operational data, Incident reports and information from
Outside Parties. Maintenance and inspection history may also be relevant.
3.3.1.7 No inspection shall commence unless the Supplier has reviewed previous inspection
reports and asset files to establish as far as possible information about the asset and
likely hazards.
a) General
b) Principal
c) Special
d) Inspections for Analytical Assessment
e) Defect Advice
3.3.3 General Inspections
3.3.3.1 The General Inspections shall be carried out to obtain and record a visual check on
those parts of the asset which are readily accessible without the aid of access
equipment.
3.3.3.3 General Inspections shall be of sufficient quality to detect and report any visual
changes since the last inspection or evidence of circumstances which may impact on
the Condition of the asset before the next scheduled inspection.
a) confirm that all inspectable parts of the asset have been examined;
b) record the extent and severity of any defects found;
c) identify the extent and severity of any changes in Condition, use or environment
since the last inspection;
d) draw attention to any observed factors which may affect the safety of the asset;
e) identify where further investigation is needed;
f) for assets supporting transient loading, identify whether the asset was observed
under such loads and if any unsatisfactory performance was observed; and
g) make recommendations for Maintenance or Strengthening and Renewal works.
3.3.5 Special Inspections
3.3.5.1 Special Inspections shall be undertaken to provide additional or more frequent
information on assets necessary for the management of the assets.
3.3.5.2 Special Inspections shall be a close inspection of a whole asset or particular areas or
defect in an asset, or Vulnerable Structures.
Note: The scope of Special Inspections may include intrusive investigations where deemed
appropriate by the Supplier.
3.3.5.3 Special Inspections shall be instigated in the circumstances and frequencies detailed
in Table 2.
3.3.5.4 The reporting process for Special Inspections shall be as for General and Principal
Inspections modified as necessary to suit the particular nature of the inspection.
3.3.6.2 The inspection shall be a close inspection of all parts of the asset carried out within
touching distance to determine actual section sizes and the extent of any
deterioration, or other features having an influence on the ability of the asset to
perform its Required Duty.
3.3.6.3 The inspection shall cover not only the Condition of the individual components, but
also the Condition of the structure as an entity, especially noting any signs of distress
and their cause.
3.3.6.4 The inspection for the Analytical Assessment shall be undertaken by the person
carrying out the Analytical Assessment.
3.3.6.5 Inspections for Analytical Assessment shall provide information on the loading applied
to the assets and factors relevant to the assets structural resistance.
b) Dimensions;
c) Surcharge loadings;
d) Imposed loadings (whether a Train Operating Company (TOC) has rights to operate
over the LU railway tracks).
3.3.6.6 Inspection information shall be provided under the following general headings:
3.3.7.2 Sufficient information shall be collected to enable the safety of the asset to be
assessed and for the full reporting of an Incident being investigated to identify
immediate and root causes.
3.3.8.2 An Inspection Plan shall be prepared to define the strategy which will be employed to
meet the objective stated in Clause 3.3.8.1 of this Standard.
3.3.8.3 The frequency of inspections defined in the Inspection Plan shall ensure that
information is available to meet the requirements of the Supplier’s Condition
Assessment and Maintenance obligations.
a) Asset Number
b) Structure Type
c) Location
d) Application
e) Minimum clearances
f) Statutory undertakers
j) Defect description
l) Condition score
m) Asset rating
n) Performance rating
q) Item score
This list is not exhaustive and other items may be required on a case by case basis.
3.3.9.2 The inspection reports shall capture, in a consistent and auditable manner, the
information required for the execution of subsequent activities.
3.3.9.3 All structures shall be visually identified within the inspection reports through the
provision of general photographs.
3.3.9.4 All defects with a score indicating a condition rating that is worse than B2 (see Table
3) shall be visually identified within the Inspection Reports through the recording of
asset numbers, defect locations within the numbered asset and sketches and
photographs to illustrate the defect.
3.3.10.2 The graphical defect notations shall provide the means for recording defects in a
consistent and repeatable manner.
Note: The graphical defect notations should be used within the following groups:
e) Exposed rebar
f) Defective fastenings
g) Paintwork condition
k) Vegetation
n) Repairs
This list is not exhaustive and other items may be required on a case by case basis.
Guidance of graphic defect notation historically used by LU is given in the Manual of Good
Practice G-051.
3.3.11.2 The defect classification system shall include classifications for the recommended
action and the priority of the recommended action.
3.3.11.3 Inspections shall report defects in accordance with the defect classification in Table 3.
1. Extent 2. Severity
A- Less than 5% 1- No ‘significant defect’
B- Between 5% and 10% 2- ‘Minor’ - defects of a non-urgent nature.
C- Between 10% and 3– ‘Heavy’ - defects of an unacceptable nature
D- 20% 4– ‘Severe’ - defects where action is needed (these shall be
Greater than 20% reported immediately to the supervisor).
3.3.12.2 For each Item, extent and severity classification as derived in Section 3.3.11 shall be
scored in accordance with Table 4 and summated to give an Item score.
3.3.12.3 All Item scores shall be added together and the overall Element rating calculated as
follows:
3.3.12.4 The overall condition rating for the asset shall be the worst Element rating.
3.3.14.2 The standard severity photographs used for comparisons shall be applied consistently
across the LU system to ensure consistency of asset Condition Assessments.
3.3.14.3 Standard severity photographs selected for use as comparative references shall be of
high quality and fully representative of the typical defects for which they are intended
to be representative.
3.3.14.4 Defects noted during inspection shall be matched to the standard severity
photographs in Attachment 0 of this Standard in order to deduce the severity score
that is to be entered in the Inspection Report.
3.3.15.2 To facilitate the evaluation of risks and development of mitigation measures the risks
to Bridges Structure assets shall be identified and quantified.
b) impacts from wind blown debris, falling trees, flood waters or floating debris
c) explosions
e) environmental conditions
g) constituent materials
This list is not exhaustive and other items may be required on a case by case basis.
3.3.15.3 Structural forms that represent significant risks and for which appropriate inspection
shall be undertaken to quantify risk include:
a) low bridges – bridges with clearances over the highway of less than 5.1m;
b) limited transverse clearances, Fragile Supports and parapets;
c) bridges over navigable waterways;
d) bridges with risk of scour;
e) structures containing cast iron elements;
f) prestressed post-tensioned concrete bridges - concrete structures employing
post-tensioning forms of construction shall be inspected in accordance with
Highways Agency – DMRB - BD54/93 and BA50/93; and
g) Overbridges with substandard parapets.
Note: This list is not exhaustive and other items may be required on a case by case basis
a) to determine the degree to which assets remain safe and fit to fulfil the
structural element of their Required Duty in their current environment and
Condition;
b) to provide the information on structural capacity of the assets in a consistent
and accurate manner;
c) to provide information necessary for the managed Maintenance strategy of the
assets;
d) to confirm that assets are safe for railway operations and for public and Outside
Party use; and
e) to provide the appropriate information on assets to meet the requirements for
the Condition Assessment process defined in Section 3.5 of this Standard.
3.4.1.2 If it can be shown by reference to documents that a structure has been designed to
current LU loading standards then there is no requirement to carry out an assessment
unless it is thought to have a reduced load capacity due to deterioration, damage or
increased dead load.
In any case the existence of documentary evidence of design to current LU loadings
shall be taken to mean that the asset is “non grey” as defined in 1-031
3.4.1.3 The Analytical Assessment shall take full account of the overall structural behaviour.
3.4.1.4 Assets shall be subject to Analytical Assessment in accordance with the whole life
Maintenance strategy programme for the asset and when:
3.4.1.6 If the assessment of any asset shows it to be inadequate to perform its Required Duty
then procedures shall be instigated to ensure that the risks associated with the asset’s
structural performance are controlled:
b) adopting procedures that ensure that the safe load capacity is not exceeded;
c) Special Inspections;
d) speed restrictions;
3.4.2.2 The level of check shall be defined for the analytical aspect of the assessment.
3.4.2.3 All operations for the execution of the Analytical Assessment shall be undertaken in a
consistent and auditable manner.
Note: Investigations may include material testing and Site Investigation, monitoring data,
operational data, Incident reports and information from Outside Parties. The
Maintenance and inspection history may also be relevant.
b) Rail bridges
The Limit State to be adopted for Rail Bridges shall be the ULS, using appropriate
partial factors given in the relevant parts of BS 5400 except where the Limit State and
factors are explicitly specified otherwise in this Standard.
c) Highway bridges
For the Limit States and partial factors to be adopted for Highway Bridges refer to the
appropriate highway authority.
d) Footbridges
The Limit State to be adopted for Footbridges shall be the ULS, using appropriate
partial factors given in the relevant parts of BS 5628, BS 5950 and BS 8110 except
where the Limit State and factors are explicitly specified otherwise in this Standard.
where
QA = γfL.Qk
therefore
For steel and wrought iron only, γf3 is applied within the resistance RA* such that
SA = (effects of QA)
SA = (effects of γfl.QK)
SA = (effects of QK)
RA = Fc.RA*
b) cracks;
c) impact damage;
d) deformation;
e) loosening of joints;
This list is not exhaustive and other items may be required in a case by case basis.
3.4.7 Loading
3.4.7.1 General
a) Dead and Superimposed Dead Loads shall be derived from the material
weights given in Attachment 0 and applied in accordance with BS5400, BS5950
or BS8110 as appropriate to the asset type under consideration.
b) In addition to the dead and Superimposed Dead Loads individual asset types
shall be subject to the loading defined below in Section 3.4.7.2 to 3.4.7.6.
c) The effects of wind shall be considered in the assessment where it may
produce a significant load effect.
d) The effects of temperature shall be considered in the assessment where it may
produce a significant load effect.
e) In particular struts in braced or anchored walls, these loads shall be determined
by considering a temperature range of -15°C to 46°C and a mean temperature
value of 10°C.
3.4.7.2 Rail bridges
a) The railway Live Loading for LU Rail Bridges to be used in Analytical
Assessment shall be as defined in BS5400 Part 2.
b) Assets supporting LU railway tracks shall be assessed for RL loading except:
I) Where a TOC has rights to operate over the LU tracks RU loading shall
be used for Analytical Assessment.
II) Concentrated wheel loads applied to the rail shall be dispersed both
longitudinally by the continuous rail and transversely by the sleeper and
ballast.
Note: The Manual of Good Practice G-051 gives details of the dispersion of loads used in
previous assessments.
Road bridges which do not carry a public road (Accommodation and Occupation
bridges) need only be assessed for 3 tons GVW for bridges built before 1903 and 5
tons GVW for bridges built after 1903 unless there is a specific legal agreement to
carry a higher load. Thus BD21/01 shall be used for assessment purposes, but only to
determine the structures’ capability of carrying 3 ton or 5 ton GVW. Accommodation
and Occupation bridges must always have their safe load capacity prominently
displayed on signs at each end of the bridge.
3.4.7.5 Footbridges
Footbridges shall be assessed for the loading defined in Attachment 7.7.However the
concentrated load condition shall NOT be applied if the footbridge being assessed
fulfils the following conditions.
b) There is no level access from the booking hall to the footbridge span
d) The staircases have at least 6 risers in the flight leading from the platform
Footbridges complying with the abovementioned conditions must be assessed for the
5kN/m2 condition, and if they satisfy this condition then a notice must be fixed to the
footbridge stating “Pedestrian Loading Only”. If a lift is installed which gives access to
the footbridge deck, then the whole bridge must be assessed for the 20kN
concentrated load.
a) Dead loads
The Dead Load shall be determined by reference to the unit weights given in
Attachment 7.3.
Note: The nominal Superimposed Dead Loads consist of the weight of soil cover to the
structure, hydrostatic pressure, the weight of any buildings.
Soil cover loads shall be applied as a uniformly distributed load (UDL). Neither
positive nor negative arching shall be assumed and the soil loads shall be assumed to
be earth pressure at rest values.
Note: It is to be assumed that equal soil pressures are applied to each side of the tunnel.
The structure shall be assessed for either the maximum or minimum earth pressure
that can act on any side wall irrespective of the earth pressure on the other side.
The assessment shall take due account of the effect of hydrostatic pressure, both
inside as well as outside the structure.
BS 8002;
CIRIA 580
e) Building loads
Nominal dead and superimposed building loads shall be combined with building live
loads at foundation level and distributed through the soil at a slope of 2 vertically to 1
horizontally.
f) Live loads
Concentrated vertical loads and line loads acting on the surface of the carriageway or
at the underside of the track ballast shall be assumed to be distributed through the soil
Sub-grade at an angle of 2 vertically to 1 horizontally.
Where the depth of cover to the bridge exceeds 1.8 m the loading shall be assumed to
be the uniformly distributed loads as defined in Attachment 7.4 of this Standard.
a) Steel
I) Steel produced before 1955 shall be assumed to have a characteristic
strength of 230 N/mm2.
II) Steel produced after 1955 shall be assumed to have characteristic
strengths based on the grade of the steel shown in the as-built drawings
and documentation of the asset under consideration.
III) Steels produced after 1955 and used for the construction of Footbridges,
cable bridges and gantries shall be assumed to have been constructed in
grade 43A steel to BS 4360.
b) Concrete
I) Pre-1939 concrete shall be assumed to have a characteristic strength not
greater than:
i) 20 N/mm2 for railway and Highway Bridges; and
ii) 15 N/mm2 for all other structures listed in Section 3.1 of this
Standard.
II) Post-1939 concrete shall be assumed to have a characteristic strength
based on information contained in the as-built drawings and
documentation of the asset under consideration.
c) Reinforcement
e) Wrought iron
The characteristic yield stress of wrought iron shall be taken as 220 N/mm2.
f) Masonry
Masonry shall be assumed to have the characteristic strengths as given in Table 5.
Characteristic strengths
Type and Age of Masonry N/mm2
Compressive Tensile
up to 1910 – stock bricks set in 1:3 lime mortar 2.5 0.0
post 1910 – stock bricks set in 1:6 cement sand mortar 4.0 0.0
post 1910 – fletton bricks set in 1:6 cement sand mortar 5.0 0.0
post 1910 – engineering bricks set in 1:3 cement sand mortar 15.0 0.0
Note: Refer to Item 39/5 of DoT publication ‘Requirements for Passenger Lines and
Recommendations for Goods Lines of the Ministry of Transport in regard to Railway
Construction and Operation’
The allowable stresses for cast iron beams, columns and struts in Footbridges, cable
bridges, gantries and Earth Retaining Walls are defined in Section 3.4.9 of this
Standard
h) Timber
Timber in Earth Retaining Walls shall be assumed to be Douglas fir, unless noted
otherwise on the as-built drawings. A stress grade of three samples shall be made
according to visible defects as laid down in BS 4978.
3.4.9.3 Concrete
a) The strength of concrete structural members within rail and Highway Bridges
shall be assessed in accordance with the HA Standard – DMRB – BD44/95 and
its accompanying Advice Note BA 44/96.
b) The strength of concrete members for structures that do not carry railway or
highway traffic shall be assessed in accordance with BS 8110 when the initial
assessment against the default values given in clause 3.4.8.3 b) of this
Standard has failed.
3.4.9.4 Masonry
Masonry tunnels shall be assessed in accordance with BS 5628: Part 1 assuming that
masonry will not resist tension.
b) Concrete fill between spandrel walls shall not be assumed to provide support or
strength to the arch barrel.
c) Concrete filled spandrel walls shall be inspected and assessed. The
assessment shall be based upon results of visual surveys.
Note: The Manual of Good Practice G-051 gives advice on the interpretation of these
observations.
b) The compressive stress in cast iron columns or struts due either to the
permanent load or to the combined permanent and live load shall not exceed
the values given in Table 6.
a) Where cast iron columns are subjected to both axial compression and bending
stresses, then the combined axial and bending stresses when checked in the
following formula must not exceed unity.
fc fbc
+
pc pbc
where:
pbc = the allowable compressive bending stress in cast iron taken as defined in 0 a)
and b) for beams.
3.4.9.8 Timber
The strength of timber members shall be assessed in accordance with BS 5268:
Part 2.
a) the depth of cover measured from the underside of the sleepers to the top of the
structure is greater than 600mm but less than 8m; and
b) the internal span, i.e. the distance between the side walls of the structure, is greater
than 900mm.
3.4.11.2 Fatigue assessments of steel structures shall be carried out in accordance with BS
5400: Part 10 amended as described in Attachment 0 of this Standard.
3.5.1.2 This section shall be read in conjunction with LU Engineering Standard 1-031 and the
Foundation Documents for Bridges and Structures.
Note: The procedure for Condition Assessment and Condition Classification of Bridge
Structure assets is diagrammatically represented Attachment 7.14.
a) Database records;
b) Current inspection reports, and whether the physical Condition of the asset affects the
ability of the asset to meet the Required Duty;
This list is not exhaustive and other items may be required on a case by case basis.
3.5.3 Inspection
The inspection of the asset shall be undertaken and reported in accordance with the
requirements of Section 3.3 of this Standard.
Note: The condition rating is not the Condition Classification for ACAC.
3.5.5.2 The Condition Classification of a Bridge Structure asset shall be obtained from the
Foundation Documents by aligning the output of the Condition Assessment and
identified Specific Concerns to any Generic Concerns that apply to the asset.
Note: Generic Concerns that are directly related to the condition rating, have been identified
for asset types that are known to be generically susceptible to defects that can affect
the ability of the asset to meet its Required Duty. However, in general, a structure that
is known to have a reserve of strength may safely be able to sustain a greater degree
of deterioration or damage than one that has no previous reserve of strength.
Consequently, Generic Concerns are not always linked to the condition rating, and the
process does not require all asset types to have a new Analytical Assessment if the
condition rating falls below any pre-defined levels.
3.5.5.3 The Assessor shall refer to the Foundation Documents for full and current details of all
Generic Concerns and corresponding indicative Condition Classifications (A to
E1/E2).
3.5.5.4 In determining the Condition Classification of the asset the following shall be taken
into account, where applicable, to lower (nearer to E1) the pre-defined Condition
Classification given in the Foundation Documents for the relevant Generic Concern:
a) For assets with Identified Work (IDW), where the period between the dates of
raising the IDW and completing the works is equal to or greater than 5 years,
the Condition Classification of the relevant Generic Concern shall not be higher
than B. Where the period is less than 5 years the Condition Classification shall
not be higher than C.
b) For assets with a Regulatory Notice, Vulnerable Structures Notice,
Improvement Notice or Restriction/Prohibition Notice, the Condition
Classification of the relevant Generic Concern shall be E1, or E2 where
justifiable.
c) For assets which have failed to meet the requirements of an Analytical
Assessment, the Condition Classification of the relevant Generic Concern shall
be E1, or E2 where justifiable.
3.5.6 Allocation of MEAV
The allocation of MEAV shall be undertaken in accordance with LU Standard 1-050.
3.6 Maintenance
3.6.1 General
3.6.1.1 Maintenance work shall be undertaken to ensure assets meet their Required Duty for
the Design Life of the asset.
3.6.1.2 Assets that fail to meet the Required Duty shall have restricted operation imposed or
be withdrawn from service.
3.6.2.2 Maintenance work shall be justified on the principles of whole lifecycle asset
management.
3.6.2.3 Where during the life of the asset service fixings and connections are required for
which provision was not made in the design and construction of the asset, a process
shall be operated to control cutting, grinding, drilling, fixing to and supporting from
existing structures in accordance with 1-050.
3.7.2.2 Strengthening and Renewal work shall be justified on the principles of whole lifecycle
asset management.
3.7.2.3 Strengthening and Renewal work shall meet the requirements of Sections 3.1 and 3.2
of this Standard.
3.8 Decommissioning
3.8.1 General
3.8.1.1 No asset shall be decommissioned without prior approval in accordance with the
requirements of LU Standard 1-538.
4 Responsibilities
4.1 LU Head of Audit shall be responsible for ensuring that a co-ordinated programme of
audit and inspection is implemented to assure that compliance with this and other
related Standards is ensured.
4.2 The Head of Civil Engineering (Projects) shall have sole responsibility for this
standard.
4.3 The LU Procurement agent shall be responsible for incorporating the requirements
of this LU standard in any contract to which it is relevant and shall stipulate that a
programme of audits are implemented by the contractor which ensures that these
requirements are complied with. This programme and its results shall be available for
verification by the LU Head of Audit.
4.4 The Supplier shall be responsible for incorporating the requirements of this LU
standard in any contract to which it is relevant and shall stipulate that a programme of
audits is implemented by the Supplier which ensures that these requirements are
complied with.
5 Supporting information
5.1 Background
5.1.1 This Standard is one of a suite of eight (8) Standards which cover the whole life cycle
of Civil Engineering assets. Other Standards in this suite have a bearing on the
activities covered by this Standard. In many cases a direct reference to another
Standard is given; in other instances the need to refer to another Standard is implied.
5.1.2 The complete suite of Civil Engineering Standards comprises the following
documents.
Number Title
1-050 Civil Engineering – Common Requirements
1-051 Civil Engineering – Bridge Structures
1-052 Civil Engineering – Gravity Drainage Systems
1-053 Civil Engineering – Building and Station Structures
1-054 Civil Engineering – Earth Structures
1-055 Civil Engineering – Deep Tube Tunnels and Shafts
1-056 Civil Engineering – Pumping Systems
1-057 Civil Engineering – Miscellaneous Assets
5.1.3 The following Manuals for Good Practice have also been prepared to give guidance
and explanation for each of the above Standards:
Number Title
G-050 Civil Engineering – Common Requirements
G-051 Civil Engineering – Bridge Structures
G-052 Civil Engineering – Gravity Drainage Systems
G-053 Civil Engineering – Building and Station Structures
G-054 Civil Engineering – Earth Structures
G-055 Civil Engineering – Deep Tube Tunnels and Shafts
G-056 Civil Engineering – Pumping Systems
G-057 Civil Engineering – Miscellaneous Assets
5.2.2 Many of the existing Bridge Structure assets have already passed a 120 year Design
Life, and were constructed without known Standards and with primitive methods and
have been the subject of phases of repair.
5.2.3 In view of these considerations this Standard requires a structured approach to Bridge
Structure asset management based on standard procedures of Inspection and
Assessment of the existing Bridge Structure assets to reduce the safety risks in
accordance with ALARP principles.
6 References
6.1 References
6.1.1 Statutory documents
Document no. Title
Railway (Safety Critical Works) Regulations, 1994
Construction (Design and Management) Regulations, 1994
6.1.6 Other
Document No. Title
Burland, J.B., Broms, B.B and De Mello, V.F.B. (1977) Behaviour of
foundations and structures. State-of-the-art Report, Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Soil
Mech. And Foundation Eng., Balkema: Rotterdam, Vol 3, 495-546.
6.2 Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are created:
6.3 Definitions
The following topic specific definitions are created:
7 Attachments
7.2.3 Footbridges
γfl is a partial load factor for each type of loading, as given in Table 8.
γf3 = 1.05 for secondary elements, failures of which will not lead to progressive
collapse;
γf3 = 1.15 for primary members supporting other parts of the structure and for
secondary members, failure of which might cause loss of life and substantial material
damage.
For the purpose of these structures, the value of γf3 shall be taken as 1.1, except in the
case of maximum horizontal earth pressure on sub-surface tunnels where it shall be
taken as 1.0.
γf3 shall be taken as 1.0 for SLS and 1.1 for ULS unless otherwise stated in this
Standard
Table 8 - Load Combinations for γfl for Footbridges, Cable Bridges and Gantries
Loading γfl
Rail surcharge loading acting adversely* 1.0
Road surcharge loading acting adversely* 1.0
Building loads 1.0
Rail surcharge loading acting beneficially* 0
Road surcharge loading acting beneficially* 0
Dead loads acting adversely:
Steel 1.05
Concrete 1.15
Reinforced concrete 1.15
Brick and stone 1.15
Masonry and timber 1.15
Dead loads acting beneficially 0.85
Building live loads 1.55
Soil parameters 1.2
Soil loads 1.0
Water 1.05
* For surcharge loadings refer to Section 0
Loading γfl
Dead Concrete, stone and brick masonry
a) acting adversely
b) acting beneficially 1.05
0.85
Super-imposed Air main cable brackets 1.05
Dead
Signal/electrical cables 1.2
Live Wind (derived from BS 5400, Part 2, Section 5.3) 1.0
Live Wind (derived from BS 6399) 1.0
Live Dynamic pressure and suction from railway traffic (derived 1.0
from ERRI D 189/RP -1 Effect of the Slipstream of passing
trains on structures adjacent to the track
For skew bridges with L-frames restraining the skew ends δ shall be calculated at
various cross-sections along the bridge and the maximum value of δ so obtained shall
be used to calculate the effective length.
The flange area pf shall be applied if the area of the flanges varies within a distance of
0.7le on either side of the location for which the moment capacity is being determined.
For the minimum section of a plated girder, the flange area ratio shall be taken as 1.0.
φd 2
Fc =
⎛ l 3 ⎞
δ + ⎜⎜ u ⎟⎟
15 Elc
⎝ ⎠
where
d2 is the distance from the centroid of the compression flange to the centroidal axis of
the deck;
Ic is the second moment of area of the compression flange about its centroidal axis
parallel to the web of the beam at the point of maximum bending moment;
1 2 1
6 RL 3 RL 6 RL
Where the spacing of cross girders is greater than 1.8 metres no distribution shall be
allowed.
Where the longitudinal timbers are less than 225mm deep (but not less than 150mm
depth) and the cross girders are spaced at 1.5 metres or less the equivalent axle load
shall be reduced in the ratio: F= cross girder centres/1.5; e.g. if the cross girders are
at 1.2m and the longitudinal timbers are 150mm deep, the cross girder immediately
under the axle shall carry 4/5 of the axle load and the adjacent cross girders on either
side shall carry 1/10 of the axle load.
1 8 1
10 R L 10 R L 10 R L
150m m
Where cross girders are spaced at more than 1.5 metres and with longitudinal timbers
less than 225mm deep no distribution will be allowed.
For a rigorous assessment φ shall be determined from the influence lines for end
rotation of the cross-girders which shall include the effects of skew where present.
Where the skew exceeds 20° the effects of Dead Load on cross-girder rotations shall
be included. For determining φ in the absence of a rigorous assessment and where
the longitudinal dispersion of concentrated load has been applied in accordance with
cross girder spacing at 1.8m or more, no dispersion allowed or:
a) for U-frame spacing greater than 1.8m, the concentrated load shall be assumed
to be applied only to the first U-frame cross girder;
b) for U-frame spacing less than 1.8m, the concentrated load shall be assumed to
be applied only to the first U-frame cross girder.
Restraint forces at bearings (BS 5400: Part 3 Clause 9.12.4.1) where the force FR
acting on the bearing stiffener shall be taken as:
FR = 2 Fu + F c
φd2
where F c =
⎛ l 3 ⎞
δ + ⎜⎜ u ⎟⎟
⎝ 15 El c⎠
7.6.4 Strength of intermediate U-frame stiffeners (BS 5400: Part 3 Clause 9.13.5)
The stress σ in the stiffener outstand shall be calculated based on the full section
ignoring shape limitations. The allowable outstand shall then be calculated from
BS5400: Part 3 Clause 9.3.4 with σys replaced by σ . γm . γf3 (i.e. σ . 1.32).
If the allowable outstand thus calculated is less than the full section then the U-frame
flexibility δ shall be recalculated using the allowable outstand and the procedures
above repeated for the new effective length. Alternatively, the strength of the stiffener
may be calculated based on the maximum allowable section (neglecting any excess
section) using the shape limitations of BS 5400: Part 3, Clause 9.3.4 acting at the
maximum stresses allowed by BS 5400: Part 3. Fu and Fc forces for this alternative
method shall be based on the full section, neglecting any shape limitations.
7.6.5 Shear resistance (BS 5400: Part 3 Clause 9.3.4)- 1982/2000 versions Clause 9.9.2
For riveted construction replace bfe tf2 in the expression for boundary restraint mfw by
2Zp, where Zp is the plastic modulus of the flange section consisting of the flange
plate or plates and the flange angles.
Note 1: Handrails and barriers shall be designed to resist loads specified in BS 6399-1: 1996
Section 12 Table 4, adopting the Type of occupancy for part of the building or
structure categories as follows:
a) Category C5 (xi) for all locations to which the public normally have access, except
where the definition in (b) applies:
b) Category C5 (x) for other locations to which the public normally have access, where a
barrier is provided for the guidance or separation of passenger flows, e.g. central
handrails on staircases and in other situations where the passage width is limited by
the barrier to not more than 2m, and barriers at the end of platforms in surface
stations:
c) Category C3 (viii) for signal and access gantries and all other locations not normally
accessible to the public.
Loading less than that stated above would need to be supported by robust justification
and risk analysis approved by the Civil Engineer, prior to being applied in the design.
The Supplier should also take into account BS 6399-1.
Fixing of baseplates, relying on the pull-out capacity of fixings, must normally be
carried out by utilizing four point fixing for each vertical post (reference BS 6180). Any
proposal to reduce the number of fixings below four must be supported by a robust,
rigorous and approved risk assessment. Within the risk assessment consideration
could be given to demonstrating either by sampling (but to a statistically significant
degree at each location) pull out test results or considering through bolting. Any case
presented would be assessed against the requirement to achieve an ALARP situation
and although cost of manufacture and installation may be (marginally) higher for 4
point fixing, the reduction in risk could far exceed this cost. Also consideration must be
given to the concept of 'best industry practice'.
Note 2: γfl to be taken as 1.0 for patch loading at ULS.
Stress due 30
to live load
(N/mm2) 20
10
0
150
-10
100
-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
Stress
50 due to permanent loads (N/mm2)
Stress due
to live load
0
(N/mm2)
-100
-150
-150 -100 -50 0 50
a) only RL loading shall be considered, even on lines where rolling stock from
other train operating companies is permitted to pass;
b) for fatigue assessment purposes, only 30% of RL loading shall be applied to the
structure.
7.10.2 Where flanges are corroded, all corrosion products shall be removed and the
minimum reduced net area shall be calculated at all sections. The maximum stress
range in the member shall then be calculated. Figure 15 in BS 5400: Part 10 shall be
used, assuming that the stress raising effect of the corroded surface is no greater than
that of the holes.
7.10.3 Where webs are corroded, a procedure similar to that for flanges shall be adopted, but
a reduced area along a horizontal section of length shall be calculated, assuming the
same stress raising effect as in 7.10.2.
7.10.4 For all tracks the most recently available actual annual traffic figures shall be obtained.
It shall be assumed that the most recently available annual traffic movements have
occurred every year since the construction of the bridge carrying the track.
7.10.5 The number of cycles of loading shall be calculated from Table 3 of BS 5400: Part 10.
The number of live load cycles referred to in Groups 1 and 2 shall be added to revised
numbers of cycles in Groups 3, 4, 5 and 6 to reflect the 30% reduction of RL loading
and these shall also be adjusted to reflect the actual numbers of trains passing.
7.11.4 Inspection
Refer to Section 3.3 of this Standard
Strength assessment
7.11.9 Decommissioning
Refer to Section 3.8 of this Standard
7.12.4 Inspection
Refer to Section 3.3 of this Standard
7.12.5.3 Loading
a) The wind loading on parapets of Viaducts with 75% of the arches closed by
walls or partitions shall be derived from BS 6399.
b) The wind loading on parapets of all other bridges and Viaducts shall be derived
from BS 5400: Part 2, Section 5.3, using a K1 factor of 0.94.
c) Railway traffic pressure and suction loads shall be determined in accordance
with Clause 3.1.17.5.
7.12.5.4 Stability assessment
a) Parapets shall be assessed for two Live Loading cases:
I) Case 1 Wind perpendicular to the parapet wall
Wind loads and railway traffic pressure/suction loads shall be applied
separately and the worst case taken for stability calculation case to wind
parallel to the parapet wall.
II) Case 2 Wind parallel to the parapet wall
The design wind speed vs derived from either BS 5400 or BS 6399 shall
be added to the train speed and the values for pressure/suction shall be
calculated from the formula set down in Clause 3.1.17.5.
b) The nominal dead, Superimposed Dead and Live Loads shall be combined to
produce the greatest overturning effect. In this worst case, the parapet wall is
required to have a factor of safety against overturning of 1.0.
7.12.6 Condition assessment and certification
Refer to Section 3.5 of this Standard
7.12.9 Decommissioning
Refer to Section 3.8 of this Standard
7.13.1.1 Nominal type RL loading consists of a single 200kN concentrated load positioned to
generate the most severe effect on the element under consideration, coupled with a
uniformly distributed load of 50kN/m for loaded lengths up to 100m. For loaded
lengths in excess of 100m, the distributed nominal loads shall be 50kN/m for the first
100m and shall be reduced to 25kN/m for lengths in excess of 100m, as shown in
Figure 4.
200kN
50 k N /m
2 5k N /m 2 5k N /m
N o li m it a t io n 100m N o L i m it a t io n
Figure 4 - RL loading
7.13.1.2 Alternatively, two concentrated nominal loads, one of 300kN and the other of 150kN,
spaced at 2.4m intervals along the track, shall be used on deck elements where this
gives a more severe condition. These two concentrated loads shall be deemed to
include dynamic effects.
N o lim it a t io n 0 .8 m 1 .6 m 1 .6 m 1 .6 m 0 .8 m N o lim it a t io n
Figure 5 - RU Loading
7.14 Condition assessment and certification diagram for bridges and structures
Asset Definition
Maintenance &
repair actions etc Specific Concerns are to be linked to Risk Assessment is required for Mitigation/
appropriate Generic Concerns. Specific Concerns where asset operational
fails Required Duty and has a restrictions
safety implication. or
Maintenance
CLASSIFICATION OF ASSETS
Indicates Each Generic Concern is classified A to E1/2. MEAV % ALLOCATION
transfer of Asset is classified by lowest (nearest to E1) of Generic Concerns that Allocation of MEAV into ACAC matrix is
information apply, or Grey A to Grey E1/E2 if full Condition Assessment (including defined for each Generic Concern.
Analytical Assessment) not completed.