Jamal Structural-Dynamics PDF

Structural
Dynamics
7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 1

Spring-Mass system subjected
to a time dependent load.
k
F(t)
m

Free-body diagram of the mass.
T = kx F(t) ma = m&x&
m
= m

F(t ) − k x = m &x&
m &x& + k x = F(t )

Solution of D.E. is sum
of homogeneous and
particular solutions:
Homogeneous :
F(t ) = 0
m &x& + k x = 0
Let :
k
ω =2
m
Then :
&x& + ω x = 0
2
ω2 is the natural circular frequency

2π
τ=
ω
τ is the period (measured in seconds)

Displacement due to simple harmonic motion.
τ
xm

One Dimensional
Bar Element

Step 1 - Select Element Type
d̂1x 1 2 d̂ 2 x
x̂
f̂ e
1x (t ) f̂ e
2x (t )
L
E - modulus of elasticity
A - cross-sectional area
ρ - mass density

Step 2 - Select a
Displacement Function
û = a1 + a 2 x̂
û = N 1d̂1x + N 2d̂ 2 x
x̂
N1 = 1 −
L
x̂
N2 =
L
Step 3 - Define
Strain/Displacement and
Stress/Strain Relationships
∂
{ε x } = = [B ] d̂
û
∂x̂
{}
[B ] = ⎢ −
⎡ 1 1 ⎤
⎣ L L ⎥⎦
{} ⎧ d̂ 1x ⎫
d̂ = ⎨ ⎬
⎩d̂ 2 x ⎭
{σ} = [D ]{ε x } = [D ][B ]{d̂}
Step 4 - Derive Element
Stiffness and Mass Matrices
and Equations
With time dependent loading
f̂1x ≠ f̂ 2 x

Newton’s Second Law

NODAL EQUILIBRIUM
EQUATIONS
∂ d̂1x 2
f̂ = f̂1x + m1
e
1x
∂t 2
∂ d̂ 2 x 2
f̂ e
2x = f̂ 2 x + m 2
∂t 2

m1 and m2 are obtained by
lumping the total mass of the
bar equally at the two nodes
ρAL
m1 =
2
ρAL
m2 =
2
Lumped Mass Model
d̂1x 1 2 d̂ 2 x
m1 x̂ m2
f̂1ex (t ) f̂ 2ex (t )
L

Equilibrium in Matrix Form
⎧ ∂ d̂1x ⎫
⎧⎪f̂ e ⎫⎪ ⎧⎪f̂1x ⎫⎪ ⎡m 1 ⎪
0 ⎤⎪ ∂ t ⎪ 2 ⎪
⎬ = ⎨ ⎬+ ⎢
1x
⎨ ⎥ ⎨ ⎬
⎪⎩f̂ e
2x ⎪⎭ ⎪⎩f̂ 2 x ⎪⎭ ⎣ 0 m 2 ⎦ ⎪ ∂ d̂ 2 x ⎪
⎪⎩ ∂ t ⎪⎭
2

Equilibrium in Matrix Form
f̂ (t ) = k̂ d̂ + [m̂ ] d̂
e &&

Defining Terms
⎡ 1 − 1⎤
[k ] = ⎢
AE
⎥ Element Stiffness Matrix
L ⎣− 1 1 ⎦
ρAL ⎡1 0 ⎤
[m ] = ⎢ ⎥ Element Lumped Mass Matrix
2 ⎣0 1 ⎦
{}d̂ Nodal Displaceme nts
{}&& ∂ 2 d̂
d̂ =
{} Nodal Accelerati ons
∂ t2

Consistent Mass Matrix
{ } &&
X = −ρ û
e
{}
{f b } = ∫∫∫ [N ] {X} dV
T
{f b } = − ∫∫∫ ρ[N ] T
{}
&û& dV
V

{û} = [N ] d̂
&û = [N ] d̂&
&û& = [N ] d̂
&&
{f b } = − ∫∫∫ ρ[N ] [N ] d̂ dV
&& T
{}
{}
V
{f b } = −[m̂ ] d̂
&&
[m̂ ] = ∫∫∫ ρ[N ] [N ] dV T

Bar Element
[m̂ ] = ∫∫∫ ρ[N ] [N ] dV
T
⎧1 − x̂ ⎫
⎪ L ⎪ ⎡ x̂
[m̂ ] = ∫∫∫ ρ⎨ x̂ ⎬ ⎢1 − x̂ ⎤ dV
V ⎪ ⎪⎣ L L ⎥⎦
⎩ L ⎭
L ⎧1 −
x̂ ⎫
⎪ L ⎪ ⎡ x̂
[m̂ ] = ρ A ∫ ⎨ x̂ ⎬ ⎢1 − x̂ ⎤ dx̂
0 ⎪ ⎪⎣ L L ⎥⎦
⎩ L ⎭
Bar Element
⎡ ⎛
L ⎜1 −
x̂ ⎞ ⎛ − x̂ ⎞ ⎛⎜1 − x̂ ⎞⎟⎛⎜ x̂ ⎞⎟ ⎤
⎢⎝ L ⎠⎝ L ⎟⎠ ⎟ ⎜ 1
⎝ L ⎠⎝ L ⎠ ⎥ dx̂
[m̂ ] = ρ A ∫ ⎢ ⎥
⎛
0 ⎢ ⎜1 −
x̂ ⎞ ⎛
⎟⎜ ⎟
x̂ ⎞ ⎛⎜ x̂ ⎞⎟⎛⎜ x̂ ⎞⎟
⎥
⎣ ⎝ L ⎠⎝ L ⎠ ⎝ L ⎠⎝ L ⎠ ⎦
ρ A L ⎡2 1⎤
[m̂ ] = ⎢ ⎥
6 ⎣1 2⎦

STEP 5 - Assemble the Global
Equations and Apply B.C.’s
{F(t )} = [K ]{d} + [M ]{d}

&&

{F(t )} = [K ]{d} + [M ]{d}
&&
Now must solve coupled set

of ODE’s instead of set of
linear algebraic equations!

[m ] = ∫∫∫ ρ[N ] [N ] dV T

Beam Element
ŷ , v̂
φ̂ 1 , m̂ 1
1 x̂ 2 φ̂ , m̂
2 2
L
f̂1y , d̂ 1y f̂ 2y , d̂ 2y

Shape Functions
N1 =
L3
1
(2x̂ − 3x̂ L + L )
3 2 3
N2 =
L
1 3
3
(x̂ L − 2x̂ 2 L2 + x̂L3 )
N3 =
L
1
3
(− 2x̂ 3 + 3x̂ 2 L )
N4 =
L
1 3
3
(x̂ L − x̂ L )
2 2

Shape Functions
1.000
N1 N3
0.500
N2
L
0.000
0 N4
-0.500

[m] = ∫∫∫ ρ[N] [N] dV
T
⎡ 156 22L 54 − 13L ⎤

⎢ 22L L2
13L 2 ⎥
− 3L ⎥
[m] = ⎢
m 4
420 ⎢ 54 13L 156 − 22L ⎥
⎢ 2 ⎥
⎣− 13L − 3L − 22L 4L ⎦
2

Lumped Mass Matrix
⎡1 0 0 0 ⎤
⎢ αL 2
⎥
m ⎢ 0 0 0 ⎥
[m] = ⎢0 210
0 1 0 ⎥
⎥
2⎢
⎢0 αL ⎥
2
0 0
⎢⎣ 210 ⎥⎦

Lumped Mass Matrix
2nd and 4th terms account for rotary inertia.

α = 0 if this is ignored.
α = 17.5 if mass moment of inertia of bar
spinning about one end is selected
2
⎛ m ⎞⎛ L ⎞
⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟
⎝ 2 ⎠⎝ 2 ⎠
I=
3
Consistent Mass Matrix - CST
⎡Q 0 ⎤
[m] = ⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 Q ⎦
⎡ 2 1 1⎤ u1
m⎢ ⎥
[Q] = ⎢1 2 1⎥ u 2
12
⎢⎣1 1 2⎥⎦ u 3
For each degree of freedom

Consistent Mass Matrix - CST
⎡2 0 1 0 1 0⎤
⎢0 2 0 1 0 1⎥⎥
⎢
ρAt ⎢1 0 2 0 1 0⎥
[m] = ⎢ ⎥
12 ⎢ 0 1 0 2 0 1⎥
⎢1 0 1 0 2 0⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣ 0 1 0 1 0 2⎥⎦
Lumped Mass Matrix - CST
⎡Q 0 ⎤
[m] = ⎢ ⎥
⎣ 0 Q ⎦
⎡1 0 0⎤ u 1
m⎢ ⎥
[Q] = ⎢0 0 1⎥ u 2
3
⎢⎣0 0 1⎥⎦ u 3

Lumped Mass Matrix - CST
⎡1 0 0 0 0 0⎤
⎢0 1 0 0 0 0⎥⎥
⎢
ρAt ⎢0 0 1 0 0 0⎥
[m] = ⎢ ⎥
3 ⎢0 0 0 1 0 0⎥
⎢0 0 0 0 1 0⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣0 0 0 0 0 1⎥⎦
Consistent Mass Matrix - Quad
⎡Q 0 ⎤
[m] = ⎢ 0 Q ⎥
⎢⎣ ⎥⎦
⎡4 2 1 2⎤
⎢2 4 ⎥
[Q] = m ⎢
2 1⎥
36 ⎢1 2 4 2⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎣2 1 2 4⎦
m = ρAt

Consistent Mass Matrix - Quad
⎡4 0 2 0 1 0 2 0⎤
⎢0 4 0 2 0 1 0 2⎥⎥
⎢
⎢2 0 4 0 2 0 1 0⎥
⎢ ⎥
m ⎢0 2 0 4 0 2 0 1⎥
[m] = ⎢
36 1 0 2 0 4 0 2 0⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢0 1 0 2 0 4 0 2⎥
⎢2 0 1 0 2 0 4 0⎥
⎢ ⎥
⎢⎣0 2 0 1 0 2 0 4⎥⎦

Hybrid Methods
Attempts have been made to combine

consistent and lumped mass approaches
to achieve some of the benefits of each!

HRZ Lumping
1. Hinton, Rock, and Zienkiewicz
2. Compute the diagonal terms of consistent
mass matrix.
3. Compute total mass of element, m
4. Compute s by adding diagonal coefficients
associated with translational D-O-F that are
in same direction.
5. Scale all diagonal coefficients by multiplying
by m/s

HRZ - Bar Element
ρ A L ⎡2 1⎤
[m̂ ] = ⎢ ⎥
6 ⎣1 2⎦
m = ρAL
ρAL
s = 4×
6
m 3
=
s 2
ρ A L ⎡3 0⎤
[m̂ ] = ⎢ ⎥
6 ⎣ 0 3⎦
HRZ - Beam Element
⎡ 156 22L 54 − 13L ⎤
⎢ 22L L 2
L − L 2 ⎥
[m] = ⎢
m 4 13 3 ⎥
420 ⎢ 54 13L 156 − 22L ⎥
⎢ 2 ⎥
⎣− 13L − 3L − 22L 4L ⎦
2
m = ρAL
ρAL
s = 312 ×
420
m = 420
s 312

HRZ - Beam Element
⎡ 420 ⎤
⎢ 312 × 156 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢ 39 ⎥
⎢ 420 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥
⎢ 0 × 4 L2 0 0 ⎥ ⎢ L2
⎥
m ⎢ m
[m̂ ] = 312 ⎥= ⎢ ⎥
420 ⎢ 420 ⎥ 78 ⎢ 39 ⎥
⎢ 0 0 × 156 0 ⎥
312 ⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥ ⎢
⎣ ⎥⎦
2
⎢ 420 2 ⎥
L
0 0 0 × 4L
⎢⎣ 312 ⎥⎦

HRZ – Quadratic Serendipity
3 1
76 36
16 8
76 36
3x3 2x2
Gauss Rule Gauss Rule

HRZ – Quadratic Lagrangian
1 1
36 36
4 16 16 4
36 36 36 36
3x3 2x2
Gauss Rule Gauss Rule

% error in natural frequencies of a thick
simply-supported plate.
Half of the plate modeled with 8-noded
24 d-o-f elements
Mode Type of Mass Matrix
m n Consistent (%) HRz Lumping (%) Ad Hoc Lumping (%)
1 1 0.11 0.32 0.32
2 1 0.4 0.45 0.45
2 2 0.35 2.75 4.12
3 1 5.18 0.05 5.75
3 2 4.68 2.96 10.15
3 3 13.78 5.18 19.42
4 2 16.88 1.53 31.7

Optimal Lumping
Only translational d-o-f
Based on consistent mass matrix
Use appropriate quadrature rule
Chose integration points to coincide
with nodal locations
[m] will be diagonal

Let p be the highest order complete
polynomial in shape function N
let m be the highest order derivative
in strain energy (m = 1 elasticity, m
= 2 bending)
Chose quadrature rule with degree of
precision 2(p-m)

Three noded bar element
p=2
m=1
2(p-m) = 2
Three point quadrature rule.
Newton -Cotes has points at the nodes.
(Simpson’ Rule)
b
⎡1 4 ⎛b+a⎞ 1 ⎤
∫a f (x)dx = (b − a )⎢⎣ 6 f (a ) + 6 f ⎜⎝ 2 ⎟⎠ + 6 f (b )⎥⎦
1
m ij = ρA ∫ N i N jdx = ∫ N i N j J dξ
−1
L
J=
2
L ⎡1 4 1 ⎤
m ij = ρA (1 − (− 1))⎢ N i (− 1)N j (− 1) + N i (0)N j (0 ) + N i (1)N j (1)⎥
2 ⎣6 6 6 ⎦
i ≠ j m ij = 0
⎡1 0 0⎤ 1 3 2
ρAL ⎢ ⎥
[m] = ⎢ 0 1 0⎥
6
⎢⎣0 0 4⎥⎦
Serendipity
1
−
12
1
3

Lagrangian
1
36
4 1
9 9

Mass Matrices
Product [m]{a} must yield the correct total force on
an element (F = ma) when {a} represents a rigid-
body translational acceleration.
Consistent mass matrices, [m] and [M] are positive
definite.
Lumped mass matrix is positive semi-definite when
zero terms appear on main diagonal.
Lumped mass matrix is indefinite when negative
terms appear on main diagonal.

Mass Matrices
Special treatment may be needed to
handle the last two cases.

Best Type ?
1. Consistent matrices usually

more accurate for flexural
problems.
2. Consistent matrices give upper
bounds on natural frequencies.

Best Type ?
1. Lumped matrices usually give natural
frequencies less than exact values.
2. Simpler to form.
3. Occupy less storage.
4. Require less computational effort.
5. Usually more important in time-history than
in vibration problems.

Damping
1. Structural damping is not viscous.
2. Due to mechanisms such as hysteresis and
slip in connections.
3. Mechanisms not well understood.
4. Awkward to incorporate into structural
dynamic equations.
5. Makes equations computationally difficult.
6. Effects usually approximated by viscous
damping.

Types of Damping Models
Phenomenological Damping Methods
(models actual dissipative mechanisms)
Ø Elastic-Plastic Hysteresis Loss
Ø Structural Joint Friction
Ø Material Micro-cracking
Spectral Damping Methods
Ø Introduce Viscous Damping
Ø Relies on Fraction of Critical Damping

Critical Damping
ξ Fraction of Critical Damping

ξ=1 Critical Damping
Critical Damping marks the transition between

oscillatory and non- oscillatory response of a
structure

Critical Damping Ratio
0 .5 % ≤ ξ ≤ 5 % Steel Piping
2% ≤ ξ ≤ 15% Bolted or riveted steel structures
2% ≤ ξ ≤ 15% Reinforced or Prestresses Concrete
Actual value may depend on stress level.

Rayleigh or Proportional
Damping
Damping matrix is a linear combination of

stiffness and mass matrices:
[C] = α [K ] + β [M ]
Rayleigh or Proportional
Damping
[C] is orthogonal damping matrix.
Modes may be uncoupled by eigenvectors
associated with undamped problem.
1⎛ β⎞
ξ = ⎜αω− ⎟
2⎝ ω⎠

If critical damping ratio is known
at two frequencies then:
1⎛ β⎞
ξ = ⎜αω− ⎟
2⎝ ω⎠
(ξ 2 ω 2 − ξ 1 ω1 )
α=2
(
ω 2 − ω1
2 2
)
(ξ 1 ω 2 − ξ 2 ω1 )
β = 2 ω1 ω 2
(ω 2
2 −ω 2
1 )
Natural Frequencies and Mode Shapes
Undamped, Unforced Response
{D} = {D }sin ωt
{D& } = ω{D }cos ωt
{D&& } = − ω {D }sin ωt
2
{D } amplitudes of nodal d - o - f
ω circular frequency
ω
f = ( Hz )
2π
Results in generalized eigenproblem
([K ] − λ [M ]){D } = {0}

λ=ω 2

Trivial Solution:
[K ] − λ [M ] ≠0
{D } = 0

Nontrivial Solution:
[K ] − λ[M ] =0
{D} ≠ 0

λi ≡ Roots of Characteristic
Polynomial (eigenvalues)
{D } i ≡ Associated Eigenvectors

ω i Natural Frequencies
{D } i Normal Modes

Natural Frequencies
[K] and [M] n x n then there are n eigenvalues
and n eigenvectors
[K] and [M] positive definite then eigenvalues are
all positive
Mii = 0 infinite eigenvalue
Mii < 0 negative eigenvalue - imaginary
frequency
Use condensation to remove ith equation if Mii = 0

Rayleigh Quotient
λ=
{D} [K ]{D}
T
{D} [M ]{D}
T
[K ] symmetric
[M ] positive definite
{D} th
approximat ion to i eigenvector
λ approximat ion to i eigenvalue
th

Rayleigh Quotient
{v } [K ]{v }
T
λ min ≤ ≤ λ
{v } [M ]{v }
T max
λ min smallest eigenvalue

λ max l arg est eigenvalue

Modal Methods
When [K], [C], [M] are known and time
independent the problem is linear.
[M ]{D }+ [C ]{D }+ [K ]{D} = R

&& & {
ext
}
{D& (0 )}, {D (0 )} given as initial conditions

Modal Methods
Assume orthogonal damping, such as
Rayleigh Damping. Modes can be uncoupled:
{D } [M ]{D } = 0
T
i j
{D } [K ]{D } = 0
T
i j
{D } [C ]{D } = 0
T
i j
i≠j
{D } [M ]{D } = 1
T
i i
{D } [K ]{D } = ω
T
i i
2
i
{D } [C ]{D } = 2 ξ ω
T
i i i i

Eigenvectors are linearly independent
[φ] = matrix of eigenvectors

(mode shapes)
{D} = [φ]{Z}
{Z} modal amplitudes

Substitute into:
[M ]{D }+ [C ]{D }+ [K ]{D} = R

&& & ext
{ }
{D& (0 )}, {D (0 )} given

[M ][φ ]{Z }+ [C ][φ ]{Z }+ [K ][φ ]{Z } = R
&& & ext
{ }
[φ ]{Z& ( 0 ) } = {D& (0 )}
[φ ]{Z ( 0 ) } = {D (0 )} given

Mode Displacement Method
& & 2
[ ]
[I ]{Z }+ [ξ ]{Z }+ ω {Z } = {p}
&

Pre-multiply by [φ]T
[φ ] T
[M ][φ ]{Z }+ [φ ] [C ][φ ]{Z& }
&& T
+ [φ ] [K ][φ ]{Z } = [φ ] {R }
T T ext
[φ ]{Z& ( 0 ) } = {D& (0 )}
[φ ]{Z ( 0 ) } = {D (0 )} given

[φ ] [M ][φ ] = [I ]
T
[φ ] [C ][φ ] = [ξ ]
T
[φ ] [K ][φ ] = [ω ]
T 2

& & 2
[ ]
[I ]{Z }+ [ξ ]{Z }+ ω {Z } = {p}
&

Modes Uncouple:
[I ]{Z }+ [ξ ]{Z }+ ω {Z } = {Z }
&& & 2
[ ]
&Z& + 2 ξ ω Z & + ω 2 Z = p i = 1, n
i i i i i i

[φ ]{Z& ( 0 ) } = {D& (0 )}
[φ ]{Z ( 0 ) } = {D (0 )}
[φ ] [M ][φ ]{Z ( 0 ) } = [φ ] [M ]{D& (0 )}
T & T
[I ] {Z ( 0 ) } = [φ ] [M ]{D& (0 )}
& T
{Z ( 0 ) } = [φ ] [M ]{D& (0 )}
& T
{Z ( 0 ) } = [φ ] [M ]{D (0 )}
T

Reduce size of problem:
m << n eq
m
{D} = ∑ {φ}i Z i
i =1

Error Estimate:
{R }− [M ]{D&& }− [C ]{D& }− [K ]{D}

ext
e( t ) =
{R } ext
For an accurate analysis :

e ( t ) ≤ 1%

In many structural dynamics
problems, more modes
participate in the quasi-static
response than in the dynamic
response. For a small m value,
the mode displacement method
may have difficulty in predicting
the quasi-static response.
Mode Acceleration method
Method
& & 2
[ ]
[I ]{Z }+ [ξ ]{Z }+ ω {Z } = {p}
&

Modal transformation only on
inertial and damping terms
[M ][φ ]{Z }+ [C ][φ ]{Z }+ [K ]{D} = R

&& & ext
{ }
[φ ]{Z& ( 0 ) } = {D& (0 )}
[φ ]{Z ( 0 ) } = {D (0 )} given

[K ]{D } = {R }− [M ][φ ]{Z&& }− [C ][φ ]{Z& }
ext
{D } = [K ] −1
{R }− [K ] ([M ][φ ]{Z&& }− [C ][φ ]{Z& })
ext −1

[φ ] [M ][φ ] = [I ]
T
[M ][φ ] = [φ ] −T

{D} = [K ] {R }− [K ]
−1 ext −1
( [φ ] {Z&& }− [C ][φ ]{Z& })
−T

[φ ] [K ][φ ] = [ω ]
T 2
[φ ] [K ][φ ][ω ] = [I ]
T 2 −1
[K ][φ ][ω ] = [φ ] [I ] = [φ ]
2 −1 −T −T
[φ ][ω ] = [K ] [φ ]
2 −1 −1 −T

{D} = [K ] {R }− [K ] [φ]
−1 ext −1 −T
{Z}+ [K ] [C][φ]{Z& }
&& −1
{D} = [K ] {R }− [φ][ω ] {Z}+ [K ] [C][φ]{Z& }

−1 ext 2 −1 && −1

{D} = [K ] {R }− [K ] [φ]
−1 ext −1 −T
{Z}+ [K ] [C][φ]{Z& }
&& −1
{D} = [K ] {R }− [φ][ω ] {Z}+ [K ] [φ] [φ] [C][φ]{Z& }

−1 ext 2 −1 && −1 −T T
{D} = [K ] {R }− [φ][ω ] {Z}+ [φ][ω ] [ξ]{Z& }

−1 ext 2 −1 && 2 −1

{D } = [K ] {R }− [φ ][ω
−1 ext 2 −1
] ({Z&& }+ [ξ ]{Z& })
⎛ 1 && 2ξ i & ⎞
{D} = [K ] {R }
m
−1 ext
− ∑ {φ}i ⎜⎜ 2 Z i + Z i ⎟⎟
i =1 ⎝ ωi ωi ⎠
First term on RHS represents quasi-static

response, the second term represents
corrections for inertia and viscous effects.
Solve for Z terms as before:
&Z& + 2 ξ ω Z& + ω2 Z = p i = 1, n
i i i i i i

Mass Condensation
Reduces number of d-o-f.
Reduces expense of computing
eigenvalues.
Detrimental to accuracy.
Not used with optimal lumping.

Guyan Reduction
⎛ ⎡ K mm K ms ⎤ ⎡ M mm M ms ⎤ ⎞ ⎧⎪ D m ⎫⎪ ⎧⎪ 0 ⎫⎪
⎜⎢ ⎥ − λ⎢ ⎥ ⎟⎨ =
⎜ ⎢ KT ⎬ ⎨ ⎬
⎝ ⎣ ms K ss ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ M ms
T
M ss ⎥⎦ ⎟⎠ ⎪⎩ D s ⎪⎭ ⎪⎩ 0 ⎪⎭
m - master degree of freedom

s - slave degree of freedom

Guyan Reduction
m - master degree of freedom
s - slave degree of freedom
Basic Assumption:
For lowest frequency modes the inertial
forces on slave d-o-f are less important
than elastic forces transmitted by master
d-o-f. Thus we ignore all mass except Mmm

Guyan Reduction
⎛ ⎡ K mm K ms ⎤ ⎡ M mm 0 ⎤ ⎞ ⎧⎪ D m ⎫⎪ ⎧⎪ 0 ⎫⎪
⎜⎢ ⎥ − λ⎢ ⎥ ⎟⎨ =
⎜ ⎢ KT ⎬ ⎨ ⎬
⎝ ⎣ ms K ss ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 0 0 ⎥⎦ ⎟⎠ ⎪⎩ D s ⎪⎭ ⎪⎩ 0 ⎪⎭
{D } = − [K ] [K ] {D }
s ss
−1
ms
T
m

Guyan Reduction
⎧⎪ D m ⎫⎪
⎨ ⎬ = [T ]{D m }
⎪⎩ D s ⎪⎭
⎡ I ⎤
[ T ] = ⎢ −1 T ⎥
⎢⎣ − K ss K ms ⎥⎦

Guyan Reduction
( [K r ] − λ [M r ] ){D m } = {0}
[K r ] = [T ] [K ][T ]
T
[M r ] = [T ] [M ][T ]
T
Both [Kr] and [Mr] are generally full.

[Mr] contains both mass and stiffness terms
Guyan Reduction
[C r ] = [T ] [C ][T ]
T
{R r } = [T ] {R }
ext T ext
[M r ]{D m }+ [C r ]{D m }+ [K r ]{D m } = {R r }

&& & ext

Compute Slaves
{D }
s i
= − [K ss − λ i M ss ]
−1
[K T
ms − λiM T
ms ]{D }
m i

Choosing Master D-O-F
Choose d-o-f where inertia is most important
These are characterized by large mass to
stiffness ratios.
Each d-o-f that has a time varying applied
load should be chosen.
Master d-o-f should not be clustered.
Process can be automated

Process for Choosing Master D-O-F
Scan diagonal coefficients of [K] and [M].

Choose d-o-f for which Kii/Mii is largest.
This becomes first slave.
Condense [K] and [M] by one order.
Repeat process using condensed matrices till
a user specified number of d-o-f remain.
These are Master d-o-f chosen in near
optimal way.

Number of Master D-O-F
Choose cut-off frequency ωc
Take this to be about three times the highest
frequency of interest.
Terminate selection of master d-o-f when Kii/Mii
< ω c2
Can combine manual and automatic selection (i.e.
Choose each d-o-f that has a time varying applied
load and then automatically select others.)
Number of Master d-o-f may be 10% - 20% of
total d-o-f.

Jamal Structural-Dynamics PDF

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Jamal Structural-Dynamics PDF

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Structural

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 1

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 2

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 3

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 4

ω2 is the natural circular frequency

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 6

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 7

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 8

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 9

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 10

With time dependent loading

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 13

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 14

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 15

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 17

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 18

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 19

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 20

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 21

[m̂ ] = ∫∫∫ ρ[N ] [N ] dV T

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 23

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 25

{F(t )} = [K ]{d} + [M ]{d}

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 26

Now must solve coupled set

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 27

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 28

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 29

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 30

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 31

⎡ 156 22L 54 − 13L ⎤

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 32

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 33

2nd and 4th terms account for rotary inertia.

For each degree of freedom

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 35

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 37

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 39

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 40

Attempts have been made to combine

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 41

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 42

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 44

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 45

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 46

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 47

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 48

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 49

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 50

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 53

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 54

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 55

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 56

1. Consistent matrices usually

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 57

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 58

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 59

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 60

ξ Fraction of Critical Damping

Critical Damping marks the transition between

7/29/2005 Dynamic Analysis 61

Actual value may depend on stress level.

Scan diagonal coefficients of [K] and [M].