Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Nutritional Epidemiology
Introduction
The 2004 Canadian Community Health Survey (9), the most
Childhood overweight and obesity are well recognized as a global recent and first national survey of dietary habits in Canada since the
epidemic (1). Recent evidence highlights that changing lifestyles 1970s, revealed that Canadian children and adolescents consume
and dietary habits, such as a high consumption of energy-dense macronutrients within an acceptable range with respect to the
foods and fluids (2), eating out at fast-food restaurants (3), larger guidelines set by the Institute of Medicine; children aged 4–18 y
portion sizes (4,5), and the consumption of reduced-fat, energy- should consume between 45 and 65% of energy from carbohy-
dense products (6) are implicated as considerable contributors to drates, 25 and 35% from fat, and 10 and 30% from protein (10).
this epidemic in children, infants, and toddlers. However, current However, with respect to food groups, Canadian children are not
population-based data on the association between food or nutrient consuming a balanced diet; they consume fewer vegetables, fruits,
intakes and BMI in early childhood are limited. Moreover, the role and milk products than recommended, too few or too many servings
of dietary fat and carbohydrates in propagating the obesity of grain products, and too many foods from the “other” food group
epidemic in young children is a source of considerable controversy, category. In fact, this other food group provided the second highest
because study findings on this subject are inconclusive (7,8). Studies percentage of daily calories (22%) next to grain products (31%) (9).
on the role of major food groups (vegetables and fruits, grain These dietary practices have been well summarized and compared to
products, milk products, and meat and alternatives) in childhood American values in a recent review (11). Alongside these trends, the
obesity have also yielded inconsistent results (7). prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity in Canada continues
to increase, more than doubling over the past 3 decades (12–14). For
this reason, this study aims to conduct a population-based analysis of
1
Supported by the Canada Research Chair Program (2003–2008). L. Dubois’ the prospective association among dietary factors, including energy
research was partly financed by the Canadian Institute of Health Information, intake, macronutrient, and food group consumption levels, and
Population Health Initiative, and by the Canadian Institute of Health Research.
The analyses were performed using data from the Québec Longitudinal Study of
overweight at 6 y of age in a Canadian cohort of children.
Child Development (1998–2002), conducted by Santé Québec, a division of the
Institut de la Statistique du Québec, and funded by the Ministry of Health and
Social Services of Québec.
2
Methods
Author disclosures: L. Dubois, M. A. Carter, A. Farmer, M. Girard, D. Burnier, F.
Tatone-Tokuda, and M. Porcherie, no conflicts of interest. The analyses were performed using data from the Québec Longitudinal
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ldubois@uottawa.ca. Study of Child Development (QLSCD), a study conducted by Santé
TABLE 2 Daily energy and macronutrient intake at 4 y of age in boys and girls by BMI
percentiles at 6 y1
Boys
Energy,2 kcal/d 1640 6 224 1590 6 215 1630 6 206 1710 6 273
Carbohydrates,2 % energy/d 53.8 6 4.0 51.6 6 3.6 54.0 6 4.0 54.5 6 4.2
Total fats,2 % energy/d 31.3 6 2.6 33.2 6 2.7 31.2 6 2.6 30.9 6 2.6
Proteins, % energy/d 14.5 6 1.6 14.5 6 1.4 14.5 6 1.9 14.4 6 1.9
Girls
Energy,2 kcal/d 1520 6 286 1460 6 234 1500 6 279 1620 6 316
Carbohydrates, % energy/d 53.8 6 2.9 53.3 6 3.0 53.9 6 2.8 54.1 6 3.3
Total fats, % energy/d 31.4 6 2.3 31.8 6 2.2 31.3 6 2.2 31.2 6 2.6
Proteins, % energy/d 14.5 6 2.1 14.5 6 2.1 14.5 6 2.0 14.4 6 1.8
1
Values are weighted mean 6 SD.
2
BMI categories differ, P # 0.05.
Boys
Vegetables and fruits, $5 servings/d 17.6 16.2 18.1 16.7
Grain products,2 $5 servings/d 23.9 15.5 19.1 42.6
Milk products, $2 servings/d 49.6 55.0 47.5 53.2
Meats and alternatives, $2 servings/d 46.8 44.3 46.5 49.0
Girls
Vegetables and fruits, $5 servings/d 14.2 13.4 14.4 13.9
Grain products,3 $5 servings/d 5.9 1.9 5.9 8.2
Milk products, $2 servings/d 46.4 40.3 44.8 56.2
Meats and alternatives, $2 servings/d 26.0 23.8 25.2 30.5
1
Values are weighted percentages.
2
BMI categories differ, P # 0.05.
3
Cell counts were too low to conduct chi-square analysis.
TABLE 4 Crude and adjusted OR for overweight in boys at 6 y of age according to daily energy,
macronutrient, and food group intakes at 4 y of age1
Model 1: energy4
1st Quintile (ref) 1 1 1
2nd Quintile 0.773 (0.364–1.64) 0.830 (0.381–1.81) 0.666 (0.276–1.61)
3rd Quintile 1.14 (0.544–2.38) 1.28 (0.594–2.75) 1.18 (0.502–2.76)
4th Quintile 1.06 (0.511–2.18) 1.25 (0.584–2.66) 0.968 (0.413–2.27)
5th Quintile 3.15 (1.58–6.27) 3.21 (1.55–6.63) 1.97 (0.851–4.57)
P-trend 0.0007 0.001 0.07
Model 2: macronutrients5
Carbohydrate 1.26 (0.846–1.87) 1.30 (0.847–2.00) 1.07 (0.658–1.75)
Total fat 1.23 (0.756 – 2.00) 1.31 (0.776–2.23) 1.04 (0.571–1.89)
Protein 1.25 (0.820–1.91) 1.30 (0.814–2.07) 1.02 (0.595–1.74)
Model 3: food groups6
Vegetables and fruits
,5 servings (ref) 1 1 1
$5 servings 0.948 (0.520–1.73) 0.984 (0.486–1.99) 0.895 (0.406–1.98)
Grain products
,5 servings (ref) 1 1 1
$5 servings 3.46 (2.15–5.57) 3.20 (1.72–5.97) 1.82 (0.894–3.71)
Milk products
,2 servings (ref) 1 1 1
$2 servings 1.17 (0.742–1.85) 1.26 (0.748–2.11) 1.36 (0.758–2.45)
Meat and alternatives
,2 servings (ref) 1 1 1
$2 servings 1.20 (0.759–1.91) 1.16 (0.676–2.00) 0.940 (0.513–1.72)
1
Odds ratios are weighted.
2
Within each model, dietary variables are measured together, not separately.
3
Each model is adjusted for birth weight, level of physical activity, mother’s smoking status during pregnancy, annual household income,
and number of overweight/obese parents. Model 2 additionally adjusts for total intake of dietary fiber and the other macronutrients. Model 3
additionally adjusts for total intake of dietary fiber, energy intake, and intakes of the other food groups.
4
Values are OR and 95% CI for energy quintiles 2, 3, 4, and 5, measured in kcal/d, compared to the lowest quintile.
5
Values are OR and 95% CI for a one percentage increase in percentage of energy/d from each of the three macronutrients.
6
Values are OR and 95% CI for meeting or exceeding food group recommendations/d as compared to not meeting recommendations.
Model 1: energy4
1st Quintile (ref) 1 1 1
2nd Quintile 1.29 (0.542–3.06) 1.42 (0.584–3.47) 1.65 (0.64–4.25)
3rd Quintile 1.87 (0.814–4.32) 1.92 (0.816–4.50) 1.50 (0.60–3.77)
4th Quintile 2.45 (1.09–5.53) 2.39 (1.04–5.49) 2.21 (0.898–5.41)
5th Quintile 2.89 (1.31–6.38) 2.89 (1.28–6.51) 2.37 (0.986–5.70)
P-trend 0.002 0.004 0.04
Model 2: macronutrients5
Carbohydrate 1.60 (0.926–2.76) 1.34 (0.760–2.37) 1.04 (0.542–2.00)
Total fat 1.61 (0.896–2.90) 1.31 (0.715–2.42) 0.984 (0.490–1.98)
Protein 1.37 (0.908–2.08) 1.22 (0.788–1.88) 1.00 (0.609–1.65)
Model 3: food groups6
Vegetables and fruits
,5 servings (ref)
1978 (40). After beverages, grain-based products such as pasta, some limitations include the reliance on participants’ memory,
rice, and pizza are the particular foods in this food group of how well selected days represent usual intakes, and the possi-
which consumption has increased the most in 20 y. An bility of under-reporting of food intakes (45). A number of
explanation for an association among boys and not girls may studies have shown that overweight or obese individuals tend to
be due to sex differences in carbohydrate metabolism and under-report to a greater extent than lean individuals (46–48).
adapting to different types of diets (41,42). Likewise, parents may be under-reporting their children’s intake,
It is also difficult to know whether the significant associations particularly for snacks rather than meals (49,50). Nonetheless,
observed in this study, with respect to consumption of grain the 24-h recall method is considered reasonably accurate for
products, would have remained if boys had higher intakes of providing group mean estimates of children’s intakes while
whole-grain products. Using data from the same sample of 4-y- being less burdensome and invasive than food records (20).
old children used in the present analyses, Desrosiers et al. (17) Overall, the results of the present study indicate that higher
reported that 22% of total energy intakes came from enriched energy intakes in young children may increase the likelihood
refined grain products and only 2% from whole-grain products. of overweight at a later age and suggest an association with
Thus, further research is needed to decipher the role of grain change in overweight status, especially among girls. Among
products in childhood obesity. boys, meeting or exceeding the recommended intake for grain
Canada’s Food Guide to Healthy Eating was recently revised, products was associated with later overweight and may also
now recommending that children aged 4–8 y consume 4–7 explain a change in overweight status. These findings provide
servings of grain products daily rather than the 5–12 previously support for the change in recommended number of grain
recommended (43,44). The present study provides evidence and servings for children aged 4–8 y made recently to Canada’s
support for this change to promote healthy body weights in Food Guide to Healthy Eating.
young children.
A major strength of this study was the use of a population- Acknowledgments
based, representative sample of children and its prospective L.D. designed the research; M.G. and M.A.C. analyzed the
design. Additionally, BMI was based on direct measurement of data; A.F., D.B., F.T., and M.P. wrote the paper; M.A.C. edited
children’s heights and weights. Although the 24-h dietary recall the paper; and L.D. had primary responsibility for final content.
is often recognized as the best method to estimate dietary intake, All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
2028 Dubois et al.
Literature Cited 27. Lytle LA, Seifert S, Greenstein J, McGovern P. How do children’s eating
patterns and food choices change over time? Results from a cohort
1. WHO. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report study. Am J Health Promot. 2000;14:222–8.
of a WHO consultation. Geneva: WHO [WHO Technical Report Series 28. Rolls BJ. The supersizing of America: portion size and the obesity
894]; 2004. epidemic. Nutr Today. 2003;38:42–53.
2. Fox MK, Reidy K, Novak T, Ziegler P. Sources of energy and 29. Young LR, Nestle M. The contribution of expanding portion sizes to the
nutrients in the diets of infants and toddlers. J Am Diet Assoc. US obesity epidemic. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:246–9.
2006;106:S28–42.
30. Colapinto CK, Fitzgerald A, Taper LJ, Veugelers PJ. Children’s
3. St-Onge MP, Keller KL, Heymsfield SB. Changes in childhood food preference for large portions: prevalence, determinants, and conse-
consumption patterns: a cause for concern in light of increasing body quences. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107:1183–90.
weights. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78:1068–73.
31. Troiano RP, Briefel RR, Carroll MD, Bialostosky K. Energy and fat
4. McConahy KL, Smiciklas-Wright H, Birch LL, Mitchell DC, Picciano intakes of children and adolescents in the United States: data from the
MF. Food portions are positively related to energy intake and body National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Am J Clin Nutr.
weight in early childhood. J Pediatr. 2002;140:340–7. 2000;72:S1343–53.
5. Rolls BJ, Engell D, Birch LL. Serving portion size influences 5-year-old 32. McGloin AF, Livingstone MBE, Greene LC, Webb SE, Gibson JMA,
but not 3-year-old children’s food intakes. J Am Diet Assoc. Jebb SA, Cole TJ, Coward WA, Wright A, Prentice AM. Energy and fat
2000;100:232–4. intake in obese and lean children at varying risk of obesity. Int J Obes
6. Rolls BJ, Miller DL. Is the low-fat message giving people a license to eat Relat Metab Disord. 2002;26:200–7.
more? J Am Coll Nutr. 1997;16:535–43. 33. Rocandio AM, Ansotegui L, Arroyo M. Comparison of dietary intake
7. Newby PK. Are dietary intakes and eating behaviors related to among overweight and non-overweight schoolchildren. Int J Obes Relat
childhood obesity? A comprehensive review of the evidence. J Law Metab Disord. 2001;25:1651–5.
Med Ethics. 2007;35:35–60.