Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: In this work, arrays of submicron ZnO structures were successfully synthesized using a one-step
Received 5 August 2008 aqueous precipitation method. Snowflake-like and flower-like morphologies were obtained by chang-
Received in revised form 15 October 2008 ing the reaction temperature. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns indicated that the ZnO arrays have a
Accepted 16 November 2008
wurtzite crystal structure. A possible growth mechanism based on the analysis done by scanning elec-
tron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution transmission electron
Keywords:
microscopy (HRTEM), and high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) is proposed. Our findings suggest that
Zinc oxide
the growth mechanism of the ZnO arrays is by self-aggregation, and that such an oriented aggregation is
Microstructure
Nanomaterials
enhanced by increasing the reaction temperature. The results also revealed that the aggregation process
Chemical growth introduces several structural defects such as differences in mass distribution and crystalline structure.
In order to study the surface chemical composition the samples were also characterized by XPS. The
results showed the presence of Zn(OH)2 and absorbed carbon species on the ZnO surface. In addition, the
photoluminescence characterization showed that on UV excitation ( = 360 nm) all samples present the
characteristic UV emission centered at 390 nm, and for the sample synthesized at 60 ◦ C, a visible emission
was also observed.
© 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0254-0584/$ – see front matter © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.11.030
S. Sepulveda-Guzman et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 115 (2009) 172–178 173
process are cost-effective and scalable and have been used in the
synthesis of a wide variety of ZnO nanostructures. The precipitation
method in particular has been successfully used to design differ-
ent structures of ZnO. Kawano et al. [14] observed a change in the
growth mechanism when the preparation method changed from
acidic to basic route. One-dimensional nanoparticles (rods) were
prepared by changing the addition sequence of reagents. The con-
trolled growth of ZnO structures by the assembly of particles has
also been reported using a precipitation method assisted by poly-
mers or surfactants [15–17]. In addition, arrays of tower-like and
tube-like ZnO structures have also been synthesized by wet chem-
ical methods. However, in order to obtain such structures a harsh
process was required [18]. The effect of reaction parameters such
as pH and reaction time on morphology has also been elucidated
[19–21]. Nevertheless, the synthesis of assembled ZnO structures in
large volumes using simpler and economical wet chemical meth-
ods is still a challenge. In this work we prepared ZnO assemblies
by a wet chemical approach without any template or surfactant.
The morphology of the assembled ZnO structures was modified by
the change of reaction temperature. In addition, structural char-
acterization of the synthesized assemblies was studied by X-ray
diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmis-
sion electron microscopy (TEM) and high-angle annular dark field
(HAADF) techniques. Surface chemical composition was also ana-
lyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS).
2. Experimental Fig. 1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the as-synthesized ZnO powders obtained
at different temperatures.
Zinc nitrate (Zn(NO3 )2 ) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) reagents were purchased
from Aldrich and used without any purification. In a typical process 12.5 ml of 0.2 M
Zn(NO3 )2 solution was added to 25 ml of deionized water. The mixture was trans- bled ZnO structures. The morphology and the average size of the
ferred to an oil bath at the reaction temperature. Once the temperature was stabilized assemblies were very uniform in each case, as seen in the SEM
12.5 ml of 4 M NaOH solution was added immediately to the mixture under vigor-
images acquired at lower magnification (Fig. 2a, c, and e). How-
ous stirring. After the addition, the mixture was heated and stirred continuously
for 3 h. To study the effect of temperature, several experiments were carried out at ever the general morphology of the assembled ZnO structures was
60 ◦ C, 70 ◦ C and 80 ◦ C. Each experiment produced an uniform ZnO precipitate that strongly influenced by the reaction temperature. The ZnO arrays
was separated by centrifugation and washed with deionized water. The ZnO samples obtained at 60 ◦ C seem to resemble flakes growing out of a common
were analyzed by SEM using a Hitachi S-4500II operating at 10 kV. TEM, HRTEM, and
nucleus (Fig. 2b). The sample obtained at 70 ◦ C contains flower-
HAADF were performed on a Philips Tecnai F20 and JEOL 2010F at 200 kV. Samples
were dispersed in ethanol at room temperature and sonicated for 10 min. Aliquots
like structures very different from those synthesized at 60 ◦ C. The
were dropped on 3-mm diameter lacey carbon copper grids. The XRD patterns were growth pattern of the particles seems to have a preferential direc-
acquired using a SIEMENS D-5005 equipment provided with a Cu tube with K␣ radi- tion, resembling leaves sticking out of a nucleus (Fig. 2d). This
ation at 1.54 Å, scanning in the 25–75◦ 2 range with increments of 0.03◦ and a swept morphology is evident in the sample synthesized at higher tem-
time of 8 s. The samples were analyzed by XPS on a PHI 5700 system equipped with
perature (Fig. 2e), which contains more defined structures, and
dual Mg X-ray source and monochromated Al X-ray source with depth profile and
angle-resolved capabilities. The charging effect was corrected by shifting the binding the pattern of growth is similar to that obtained at 70 ◦ C (Fig. 2c).
energies, considering the C 1s signal at 284.6. Nonlinear fit, using Gaussian curves, However, the structure is formed by uniform rods with common
was performed, maintaining the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) constant for nuclei, rather than leaf-like structures. These observations suggest
all components in a particular spectrum. The photoluminescence (PL) characteriza- that the precipitation process can be a successful method to obtain
tion was performed at room temperature on a Jovin Yvon fluorometer under 360 nm
excitation from a 75 W UV Xe lamp. The spectra were acquired from ZnO powder
different ZnO arrays under milder conditions, in contrast to those
dispersed in ethanol in a quartz cuvette. In order to correct the electronic noise obtained at longer reaction time and higher temperature [18,19].
Savitzky-Golay algorithm was applied to all spectra and finally normalized to the In addition, the average size of the resulting arrays decreased from
maximum value. 1 m to 500 nm when the reaction temperature was increased from
60 ◦ C to 80 ◦ C. This might have been promoted by a higher number
3. Results and discussion of ZnO nuclei formed at the higher temperature during the pre-
cipitation process. The subsequent particle growth was restricted
Fig. 1 shows the XRD patterns of as-synthesized powders at dif- resulting in a smaller particle size. In order to study the structure
ferent temperatures, all diffraction peaks can be indexed to the and find evidence about the growth mechanism of the assembled
hexagonal phase of ZnO and agree very well to the reported data ZnO structures, analyses of HAADF, TEM and HRTEM were done.
(JCPDS 05-0664). This indicates that even the samples synthesized Fig. 3 shows the HAADF images acquired from the ZnO assemblies.
at lower temperatures have a well-defined crystalline structure. In The HAADF images show little diffraction effects, and hence con-
addition, no other peak related with impurities was detected in the tain very useful information about the chemical composition and
XRD patterns. However, differences in the relative peak intensities the mass distribution [22]. The ZnO assemblies show a heteroge-
of the diffraction pattern of the three samples were observed, which neous mass distribution according to the differences in brightness
can be associated with a particular orientation for each sample. observed in the respective HAADF images (Fig. 3). This observa-
tion is also related to some irregularities on the surface [23]. This
3.1. Morphology and structural characterization characteristic is stronger in the assembly synthesized at lower tem-
perature as was revealed by the irregular brightness in the flake-like
Fig. 2 shows the SEM images of the ZnO samples synthesized structure (Fig. 3a). The TEM images can provide details about the
at 60 ◦ C, 70 ◦ C, and 80 ◦ C revealing high-yield growth of assem- structure of the ZnO assemblies. Fig. 4 shows bright-field TEM
174 S. Sepulveda-Guzman et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 115 (2009) 172–178
Fig. 2. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images at low and high magnifications of the assembled ZnO structures synthesized at (a and b) 60 ◦ C; (c and d) 70 ◦ C, and (e and
f) 80 ◦ C.
images of the flake-like, leaf-like and rod-like structures obtained ture (Fig. 4a). The image also shows a fairly smooth surface as was
at different temperatures. Regular fringes spaced at 0.28 nm, which previously observed by HAADF analysis, which is attributed to the
corresponds to the (1 0 0) interplanar distance are clearly visible random attachment of ZnO nanoparticles to the flake-like structure,
in the HRTEM image of the sample synthesized at lower tempera- resulting in a rough surface. This effect is less evident in the sam-
Fig. 3. High-angle annular dark field (HAADF) images of the ZnO assemblies obtained at (a) 60 ◦ C, (b) 70 ◦ C and (c) 80 ◦ C.
S. Sepulveda-Guzman et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 115 (2009) 172–178 175
ple synthesized at 70 ◦ C. The HRTEM image clearly shows a fringe reaction temperature. This in turn changes the morphology of the
spacing of 0.513 nm and 0.283 nm which corresponds to (0 0 1) and resulting ZnO arrays formed under different reaction conditions.
(1 0 0) planes, respectively. Nevertheless, the sample synthesized at A growth mechanism is proposed in Fig. 5. During the precipi-
80 ◦ C in contrast to that synthesized at lower temperature shows tation process ZnO nuclei were produced and in the absence of
a smooth surface and the corresponding HRTEM image revealed any stabilizer agent, regular array-like structures were formed by
that the arrays are formed by crystalline rods with a lattice spac- self-aggregation process as was indicated by HRTEM analysis. This
ing of 0.287 nm, which corresponds to the (1 0 0) planes in ZnO. self-aggregation can proceed either by a randomly oriented or by a
The HRTEM image also shows that the rods grow along the [0 0 0 1] highly oriented process, as reported in several works [25,26]. In this
direction, the polar c-axis of the ZnO crystal lattice (Fig. 4f) [24]. case the oriented aggregation was highly favored by increasing the
These observations revealed that the growth mechanism of ZnO reaction temperature as was observed in the sample synthesized at
structures in aqueous solution can be modified by changing the 80 ◦ C. This either resulted from the aggregation of primary nanopar-
Fig. 4. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of the ZnO arrays synthesized at (a) 60 ◦ C, (b) 70 ◦ C, and (c) 80 ◦ C. High-resolution transmission electron microscope
(HRTEM) images of the structure base of the arrays obtained at (d) 60 ◦ C, (e) 70 ◦ C, and (f) 80 ◦ C.
176 S. Sepulveda-Guzman et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 115 (2009) 172–178
Fig. 6. High-resolution Zn 2p3/2 XPS spectra and high-resolution O 1s XPS spectra for the samples synthesized at different temperatures.
S. Sepulveda-Guzman et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 115 (2009) 172–178 177
4. Conclusions
[1] J. Zhou, N.S. Xu, Z.L. Wang, Adv. Mater. 18 (2006) 2432.
[2] A. Dorfman, N. Kumar, J.-I. Hahm, Langmuir 22 (2006) 4890.
[3] L.K. van Vugt, S. Rulhle, D. Vanmaekelbergh, Nano Lett. 6 (2006) 2707.
[4] J. Song, X. Wang, J. Liu, H. Liu, Y. Li, Z.L. Wang, Nano Lett. 8 (2008) 203.
[5] J. Xie, H. Deng, Z.Q. Xu, Y. Li, J. Huang, J. Cryst. Growth 292 (2006) 227.
[6] W.J.E. Beek, M.M. Wienk, R.A.J. Janssen, Adv. Mater. 16 (2004 1009).
[7] S. Sadhu, T. Sen, A. Patra, Chem. Phys. Lett. 440 (2007) 121.
[8] S.-S. Chang, S.O. Yoon, H.J. Park, A. Sakai, Mater. Lett. 53 (2002) 432.
[9] R.S. Mane, W.-J. Lee, C.D. Lokhande, B.W. Cho, S.-H. Han, Curr. Appl. Phys. 8
(2008) 549.
[10] D.-F. Zhang, L.-D. Sun, J.-L. Yin, C.-H. Yan, R.-M. Wang, J. Phys. Chem. B 109 (2005)
8786.
[11] H.-W. Suh, G.-Y. Kim, Y.-S. Jung, W.-K. Choi, D. Byun, J. Appl. Phys. 97 (2005)
044305.
[12] M.C. Newton, P.A. Warburton, Mater. Today 10 (2007) 50.
[13] N.-K. Park, G.B. Han, J.D. Lee, S.O. Ryu, T.J. Lee, W.C. Chang, C.H. Chang, Curr.
Appl. Phys. 6S1 (2006) e176.
[14] T. Kawano, H. Imai, Cryst. Growth Des. 6 (2006) 1054.
[15] Z.R. Tian, J.A. Voigt, J. Liu, B. Mckenzie, M.J. Mcdermott, M.A. Rodriguez, H.
Konishi, H. Xu, Nat. Mater. 2 (2003) 821.
[16] H.-P. Cong, S.-H. Yu, Adv. Funct. Mater. 17 (2007) 1814.
[17] R.V. Kumara, R. Elgamiela, Y. Koltypin, J. Norwigb, A. Gedanken, J. Cryst. Growth
250 (2003) 409.
[18] Z. Wang, X.-F. Qian, J. Yin, Z.-K. Zhu, Langmuir 20 (2004) 3441.
[19] Q. Ahsanulhaq, S.H. Kim, J.H. Kim, Y.B. Hahn, Mater. Res. Bull. 43 (2008) 3483.
[20] J. Liu, X. Huang, Y. Li, J. Duan, H. Ai, Mater. Chem. Phys. 98 (2006) 523.
Fig. 8. Photoluminescence spectra of the arrays synthesized at different tempera- [21] Y. Wang, X. Li, N. Wang, X. Quan, Y. Chen, Sep. Purif. Technol. 62 (2008) 729.
tures. [22] U. Pal, P. Santiago, J. Phys. Chem. B 109 (2005) 15317.
178 S. Sepulveda-Guzman et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 115 (2009) 172–178
[23] B. Reeja-Jayan, E. De la Rosa, S. Sepulveda-Guzman, R.A. Rodriguez, M. Jose- [30] N.S. Ramgir, I.S. Mulla, V.K. Pillai, J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006) 3995.
Yacaman, J. Phys. Chem. C 112 (2008) 240. [31] C.D. Wagner, D.E. Passoja, H.F. Hillery, T.G. Kinisky, H.A. Six, W.T. Jansen, J.A.
[24] W.-J. Li, E.-W. Shi, W.-Z. Zhong, Z.-W. Yin, J. Cryst. Growth 203 (1999) 186. Taylor, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 21 (1982) 933.
[25] B. Liu, S.-H. Yu, L. Li, F. Zhang, Q. Zhang, M. Yoshimura, P. Shen, J. Phys. Chem. B [32] N.S. Ramgir, D.J. Late, A.B. Bhise, M.A. More, I.S. Mulla, D.S. Joag, K. Vijayamo-
108 (2004) 2788. hanan, J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006) 18236.
[26] C. Pacholski, A. Kornowski, H. Weller, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41 (2002) 1188. [33] Z. Li, Y. Xiong, Y. Xie, Inorg. Chem. 42 (2003) 8105.
[27] R.L. Penn, J.F. BanÞeld, Science 281 (1998) 969. [34] S. Yamabi, H. Imai, J. Mater. Chem. 12 (2002) 3773.
[28] E. De la Rosa, S. Sepulveda-Guzman, B. Reeja-Jayan, A. Torres, P. Salas, N. Eli- [35] D.H. Zhang, Z.Y. Xue, Q.P. Wang, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 35 (2002) 2837.
zondo, M. Jose-Yacaman, J. Phys. Chem. C 111 (2007) 8489. [36] H. Zhou, H. Alves, D.M. Hofmann, W. Kriegseis, B.K. Meyer, G. Kaczmarczyk, A.
[29] L.S. Dake, D.R. Baer, J.M. Zachara, Surf. Interf. Anal. 14 (1989) 71. Hoffmann, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80 (2002) 210, doi:10.1063/1.1432763.