Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
t® D
al u se o
home visit by an appropriately trained (SOR: C).
ig h
yrcommentary rso n
Clinical
op pe
For that requires
ACcomplex problem
a team approach
who don’t respond to treatment or have a
suspected “organic” cause of FTT always
We admit several infants with FTT to warrant further laboratory investigation to
the hospital each month from a large identify the 1% of cases that result from a
FAST TRACK population of young families at Fort diagnosable disease. FTT can also be the
As many as 10% Bragg, NC, and manage many more in sole indication of neglect or nonaccidental
our outpatient practice. Our experience trauma, with devastating consequences.
of children seen confirms that FTT is a complex problem Early identification of an infant or child
in primary care with many potential causes. approaching the diagnostic criteria for
show signs of Laboratory and other evaluation FTT is critical. Diagnosis and intervention
failure to thrive beyond history, physical examination, may be delayed by inaccurate growth
and observation rarely help establish curve points, loss of a growth chart in a
the diagnosis or prognosis. Incidental busy practice, or lack of well-child visits.
abnormalities occasionally change Our experience with early detection and a
management, but more often result in multidisciplinary team treatment approach
false positives. has been highly successful.
Close follow-up and a multidisciplinary
team approach generally uncover the cause Robert Gauer, MD
Family Medicine Residency Clinic Faculty,
and lead to successful treatment. Children Womack Army Medical Center, Fort Bragg, NC
For mass reproduction, content licensing and permissions contact Dowden Health Media.
TABLE
FAST TRACK
Consider child ogy Organization11 recommend that phy- 6. Gahagan S, Holmes R. A stepwise approach to
sicians consider celiac sprue in children evaluation of undernutrition and failure to thrive.
neglect when presenting with FTT. Interestingly, the Co-
Pediatr Clin North Am. 1998;45:169-187.
medical chrane Database of Systematic Reviews 7. Gahagan S. Failure to thrive: a consequence of un-
dernutrition. Pediatr Rev. 2006;27:e1-11.
intervention suggests that there is little systematic evi-
8. Skuse DH, Gill D, Reilly S, Wolke D, et al. Failure
dence to support routine growth monitor-
doesn’t resolve ing in children.12 ■
to thrive and the risk of child abuse: a prospective
population survey. J Med Screen. 1995;2:145-149.
the failure to thrive 9. Shah MD. Failure to thrive in children. J Clin Gas-
References troenterol. 2002;35:371-374.
1. Olsen EM. Failure to thrive: still a problem of defini- 10. American Gastroenterological Association. Ameri-
tion. Clin Pediatr. 2006;45(1):1-6. can Gastroenterological Association medical po-
sition statement: celiac sprue. Gastroenterology.
2. Wright CM. Identification and management of fail- 2001;120:1522-1525.
ure to thrive: a community perspective. Arch Dis
Child. 2000;82(1):5-9. 11. WGO-OMGE practice guideline: celiac disease.
2005. Available at: www.worldgastroenterology.
3. Block RW, Krebs NF. Failure to thrive as a manifes-
org/globalguidelines/guide13/guideline13.htm. Ac-
tation of child neglect. Pediatrics. 2005;116:1234-
cessed September 30, 2007.
1237.
12. Panpanich R, Garner P. Growth monitoring in
4. Perrin EC, Cole CH, Frank DA, et al. Criteria for
children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1999;(4):
determining disability in infants and children: fail-
CD001443.
ure to thrive. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ).
2003;(72):1-5. 13. Bergman P, Graham J. An approach to “failure to
thrive.” Aust Fam Physician. 2005; 34:725-729.
5. Rudolf MC, Logan S. What is the long-term out-
come for children who fail to thrive? A systematic 14. Krugman SD, Dubowitz H. Failure to thrive. Am
review. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90:925-931. Fam Physician. 2003;68:879-884.