Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Please cite this article in press as: Hanlon K, Copland M, Chronic myeloid leukaemia, Medicine (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.mpmed.2017.02.004
LEUKAEMIAS
The pH chromosome
9 9q+
24
2
21
13
1
22q
1 12 Philadelphia
22 chromosome
21
2 1 12
22
31 11 Bcr-Abl
1 fusion protein
3
34 13
Figure 1 Characteristic features of CML. Left: the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome; right: blood film from a patient with chronic-phase CML,
demonstrating neutrophilia, basophilia and left shift with frequent myelocytes and metamyelocytes.
remains very poor, with a median survival of 7e11 months bruising. Patients presenting with very high white cell counts (>100
despite multiple aggressive therapies. 109/litre) can have symptoms associated with leucostasis,
including headaches, visual disturbance, dyspnoea and priapism.
Diagnosis
Investigations
Approximately 30% of patients with CML are asymptomatic, the
diagnosis being made following an incidental finding of leucocy- In CML, the white cell count at diagnosis can range from 15
tosis on a full blood count. Symptoms at presentation are often non- 109/litre to >200 109/litre. Very high white cell counts are often
specific and include fatigue, night sweats, weight loss, abdominal associated with symptoms; thrombocytosis can also be a feature.
discomfort as a result of splenomegaly (present in 50e90% patients The blood film shows characteristic features, with expansion of
at diagnosis) or splenic infarction, spontaneous bleeding or all types of myeloid cells including neutrophils, basophils, eo-
sinophils and their precursors (Figure 1, right panel). Nucleated
red cells are often seen. A bone marrow aspirate taken during the
Criteria required for the diagnosis of chronic, accelerated chronic phase demonstrates a hypercellular marrow with
and blast-phase CML according to the World Health myeloid hyperplasia and an increased myeloid:erythroid ratio.
Organization (WHO) classification1 The percentage of blasts in the peripheral blood and bone marrow
Phase WHO diagnostic criteria is crucial for staging CML (Table 1). A bone marrow trephine
sample shows a packed marrow, and fibrosis can be a feature.
Chronic phase Absence of all features listed below Fluorescence in situ hybridization or cytogenetics on a bone
Accelerated phase One or more of the following features: marrow specimen reveals the Philadelphia chromosome. The
C Blasts comprise 10e19% of peripheral BCR-ABL fusion gene is demonstrated by qualitative polymerase
blood white cells or nucleated bone chain reaction (PCR) of peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
marrow cells
C Peripheral blood basophilia of 20% of Differential diagnosis
peripheral blood white cells or nucle-
Acute myeloid leukaemia
ated bone marrow cells
Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia
C Persistent thrombocytopaenia (<100
Chronic neutrophilic leukaemia
109/litre) unrelated to therapy, or
Myelofibrosis
persistent thrombocytosis (>1000
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) therapy
109/litre) unresponsive to therapy
Severe sepsis
C Increasing spleen size and white cell
Chronic eosinophilic leukaemia
count unresponsive to therapy
Essential thrombocytosis
C Cytogenetic clonal evolution
Bone marrow infiltration with non-haematological
Blast phase One or more of the following features:
malignancy.
C Blasts 20% of peripheral blood white
cells or nucleated bone marrow cells
C Extramedullary blast proliferation Management
C Large foci or clusters of blasts in a bone Patients presenting with a very high white cell count may require the
marrow biopsy cytoreductive agent hydroxycarbamide and leucapheresis to rapidly
reduce the white cell count until the diagnosis has been confirmed.
Table 1
Please cite this article in press as: Hanlon K, Copland M, Chronic myeloid leukaemia, Medicine (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.mpmed.2017.02.004
LEUKAEMIAS
Since imatinib mesylate was licensed in 2001, TKIs have become the Management of chronic-phase CML
mainstay of therapy for patients with all phases of CML, and the gold TKIs currently available for first-line therapy of chronic-phase
standard therapy for chronic-phase disease. The European Leuke- CML are imatinib, nilotinib and dasatinib. Imatinib is
miaNet has developed comprehensive guidelines making recom- commenced at a dose of 400 mg once daily. After 12 months of
mendations for therapy and monitoring response in CML.3 treatment, the seminal IRIS (International Randomized IFN vs
All currently available TKIs (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, STI571) trial reported a CCyR rate of 69% with imatinib.2
bosutinib, ponatinib) inhibit BCR-ABL by occupying the ATP- More recent clinical trials comparing imatinib with either
binding pocket of the kinase domain, preventing phosphoryla- nilotinib (ENESTnd (Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in
tion of downstream effector molecules. Nilotinib is a more potent Clinical Trials eNewly Diagnosed Patients); imatinib 400 mg
(30e50) and selective TKI with a much higher affinity than once daily versus nilotinib 300 mg twice daily or 400 mg twice
imatinib for BCR-ABL1. Dasatinib is >300-fold more potent than daily)4 or dasatinib (DASISION; Dasatinib Versus Imatinib Study
imatinib and has activity against the SRC family of kinases as in Study in Treatment-Naive CML Patients; imatinib 400 mg once
well as BCR-ABL. daily versus dasatinib 100 mg once daily)5 have shown that
TKIs are metabolized via the cytochrome P450 isoenzyme these more potent, second-generation TKIs have superior CCyR
CYP3A4. Care needs to be taken when prescribing other drugs and MMR (46% for nilotinib versus 28% for imatinib, and 55%
that are CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers as TKI concentrations can for dasatinib versus 28% for imatinib) rates to imatinib. How-
be significantly increased, resulting in toxicity, or reduced, ever, despite more rapid and deeper molecular responses, this
resulting in treatment failure. has not translated into improved overall survival. Furthermore,
these more potent TKIs have different adverse effect profiles
Therapeutic monitoring (Table 2). Full compliance with TKI therapy is essential to obtain
The aim of treatment is to induce haematological, cytogenetic an optimal response. Recent clinical trials have shown that a
and molecular remission. Full blood counts should be performed proportion of chronic-phase patients with very low or unde-
fortnightly until haematological remission is obtained. Three- tectable levels of BCR-ABL transcripts can successfully stop TKI
monthly bone marrow aspirates can be taken to monitor the therapy.
cytogenetic response, although this has largely been replaced by In patients who lose MMR, a kinase domain mutation screen
three-monthly assessment of BCR-ABL1 by quantitative real-time should be performed to identify resistant mutations and guide
(qRT)ePCR of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. subsequent therapy. Depending on the mutational analysis,
An optimal cytogenetic response is defined as 35% Philadel- adverse effect profile and first-line TKI used, nilotinib, dasatinib,
phia chromosome after 3 months and 0% (complete cytogenetic bosutinib or ponatinib can be considered for second line therapy.
response (CCyR)) after 6 months of treatment. Detectable Phila- The third-generation TKI ponatinib is the only TKI effective
delphia chromosome after 12 months of treatment means the against the T315I kinase domain mutation.
treatment has failed. qRT-PCR is much more sensitive and can detect Patients failing to respond to treatment with available TKIs
very small amounts of BCR-ABL1 (sensitivity 4e5 log reduction in should be considered for allogeneic stem cell transplantation
transcript levels from baseline). In newly diagnosed chronic-phase (alloSCT), providing they can tolerate the procedure and have a
CML, the aim of therapy is to achieve a major molecular response suitable donor. AlloSCT is associated with significant morbidity
(MMR; <0.1% BCR-ABL1:control gene) within 12 months of and mortality for many patients, especially older or frail in-
commencing TKI therapy. This is considered an optimal response; dividuals, but is curative in approximately 70% of patients in the
patients who achieve MMR have a better long-term outcome. chronic phase.
Myelosuppression þ þ þ þ þ
Transaminitis þ þ þ þ þ
Fluid retention þ þ þ þ þ
Hepatitis B reactivation þ þ þ þ þ
QT prolongation þþ þ þ þ
Cardiovascular events þ þ þþ
Peripheral vascular disease þþ þþ
Cardiac failure þ þ
Pleural effusions þþ þ þ
Diarrhoea þþ
Elevated lipase þþ þ þþ
Pulmonary artery hypertension þ
Hyperglycaemia þ
Elevated lipids þ
Table 2
Please cite this article in press as: Hanlon K, Copland M, Chronic myeloid leukaemia, Medicine (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.mpmed.2017.02.004
LEUKAEMIAS
Management of advanced-phase CML 3 Baccarani M, Deininger MW, Rosti G, et al. European LeukemiaNet
Patients with accelerated-phase CML are treated as for chronic- recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leuke-
phase disease, but if they do not achieve optimal treatment mia: 2013. Blood 2013; 122: 872e84.
milestones, they should proceed to alloSCT, if appropriate, at the 4 Hochhaus A, Saglio G, Hughes TP, et al. Long-term benefits and
earliest opportunity.3 Patients with blast-phase CML often have a risks of frontline nilotinib vs imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia in
transient haematological response to imatinib alone (50e70% of chronic phase: 5-year update of the randomized ENESTnd trial.
patients), with cytogenetic response rates <20%. Patients often Leukemia 2016; 30: 1044e54.
require intensive acute myeloid leukaemia-type chemotherapy 5 Cortes JE, Saglio G, Kantarjian HM, et al. Final 5-year study results
such as FLAG-Ida (fludarabine, cytarabine, idarubicin and GCSF) of DASISION: the dasatinib versus imatinib Study in treatment-
in combination with a TKI. Patients with blast-phase disease who naive chronic myeloid leukemia patients trial. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:
achieve a response (return to chronic phase or better) should 2333e40.
proceed immediately to alloSCT if appropriate.
FURTHER READING
Prognosis Apperley JF. Chronic myeloid leukaemia. Lancet 2015; 385: 1447e59.
Patients who have an optimal response to a TKI can expect a Bower H, Bjorkholm M, Dickman PW, Hoglund M, Lambert PC,
normal life expectancy. In patients with a CCyR or MMR, the risk of Andersson TM. Life expectancy of patients with chronic myeloid
blast phase is 2.1% in the first year and <1% per year thereafter.2 leukemia approaches the life expectancy of the general population.
Despite the introduction of TKIs, the outcome for blast-phase CML J Clin Oncol 2016; 34: 2851e7.
remains poor, with an overall survival of <20% at 2 years. A Cortes JE, Kim DW, Pinilla-Ibarz J, et al. A phase 2 trial of ponatinib in
Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. New Engl J Med
2013; 369: 1783e96.
KEY REFERENCES Mahon FX, Rea D, Guilhot J, et al. Discontinuation of imatinib in pa-
1 Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, et al. The 2008 revision of the tients with chronic myeloid leukaemia who have maintained com-
World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neo- plete molecular remission for at least 2 years: the prospective,
plasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. multicentre Stop Imatinib (STIM) trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11:
Blood 2009; 114: 937e51. 1029e35.
2 Druker BJ, Guilhot F, O’Brien SG, et al. Five-year follow-up of Steegmann JL, Baccarani M, Breccia M, et al. European LeukemiaNet
patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. New Engl recommendations for the management and avoidance of adverse
J Med 2006; 355: 2408e17. events of treatment in chronic myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia 2016;
30: 1648e71.
TEST YOURSELF
To test your knowledge based on the article you have just read, please complete the questions below. The answers can be found at the
end of the issue or online here.
Please cite this article in press as: Hanlon K, Copland M, Chronic myeloid leukaemia, Medicine (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.mpmed.2017.02.004
LEUKAEMIAS
Investigations
What is the most likely mechanism for the effusion?
Full blood count was normal
A. Leukaemic involvement of the pleura
Recent BCR-ABL1 transcript levels 5% and 12%
B. Ischaemic cardiomyopathy
Development of T315I mutation confirmed
C. Fluid overload
D. Lung infarction
E. Adverse drug reaction What is the next most appropriate management change?
A. Change nilotinib to bosutinib
B. Change nilotinib to ponatinib
Question 3
C. Increase the dose of nilotinib
A 46-year-old man had been diagnosed with chronic myeloid D. Intensive acute myeloid leukaemia-type chemotherapy
leukaemia in chronic phase 2 years previously. Initial treatment E. Allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation
was with imatinib, changed to nilotinib 300 mg twice daily
Please cite this article in press as: Hanlon K, Copland M, Chronic myeloid leukaemia, Medicine (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.mpmed.2017.02.004