Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CHEMICAL EQUILIBRIUM: The condition where the concentrations of all reactants and
products no longer change with time is called chemical equilibrium
What is actually going on?
• At chemical equilibrium, the forward rate of the reaction, that produces product(s), and the
backwards rate of reaction, that produces reactant(s) are equal
• One condition for reaching equilibrium is that there is no process by which the reactant(s) or
product(s) are removed from the system
Familiar examples of equilibrium
Chemical equilibrium is similar, but deals with rates of chemical reactions
What this means is that at equilibrium the ratio of the concentration of B to A will always have the
same value
2
• Once equilibrium is established, the concentrations of A and B do not change
• This does not mean that all reactions have stopped. Rather it means that the rates of the
forward and backward reactions are equal to each other, and therefore, there is no net change
in the concentration of reactant and product
• This is known as a dynamic equilibrium. The forward and reverse reactions are represented by
a double arrow in the chemical equation:
At dynamic equilibrium:
• The concentrations of A and B are constant
• The forward and reverse reaction rates are equal
Kc = (0.00272)2/(0.0402)(0.1207)3 = 0.105
4
(equilibrium lies to the left, not much ammonia will be present at equilibrium conditions)
Often we do not know (or are not easily able to determine) the concentration of all products and
reactants at equilibrium
• However, if we know the concentration of reactants and products at the start of the experiment,
and the concentration of at least one product or reactant at equilibrium, and we know the
stoichiometry of the balanced chemical equation, we can determine the values of the other
reactants and products
The steps in this method are as follows:
1. List the known initial and equilibrium concentrations of all reactants and products involved in
the equilibrium
2. For those reactants or products, for which both the initial and equilibrium concentrations are
known, calculate the change in concentration that occurs as the system reaches equilibrium
3. Use the stoichiometry of the reaction to calculate the predicted changes in concentration for all
the other reactants and products in the equilibrium
4. From the initial concentrations, and the changes in concentration, calculate the equilibrium
concentrations (and Kc)
Example:
In one of Haber's experiments, 0.025 mol of H2(g) and 0.010 mol of N2(g) are combined in a 2L vessel
at 472°C. The mixture is allowed to come to equilibrium and the concentration of NH3(g) is observed
to be 3.18 x 10-5M. Calculate Kc for the Haber reaction at this temperature.
1. The known initial and equilibrium concentrations for the different compounds are:
Initial concentrations:
H2(g) is 0.025 mol / 2L = 0.0125M
N2(g) is 0.010 mol / 2L = 0.005M
NH3(g) is 0M initially
Final (equilibrium) concentrations:
H2(g) ?
N2(g) ?
NH3(g) is 3.18 x 10-5M
2. Initial and final concentrations are known only for NH3(g):
∆[NH3(g)] = Equilibrium concentration - Initial concentration
∆[NH3(g)] = 3.18 x 10-5M - 0M = 3.18 x 10-5M = the amount of ammonia produced in
the reaction
3. Stoichiometry of balanced equation:
N2(g) + 3H2(g) -> 2NH3(g), therefore, stoichiometry is:
Relating Kc and Kp
For a gas we can express the equilibrium constant in terms of concentration (molarity) or in units of
pressure. How are these related?
The Magnitude of K
The magnitude of the equilibrium constant, K, indicates the extent to which a reaction will proceed: ie.
small or large K values.
Knowing the value of the equilibrium constant, K, will allow us to determine:
• The direction a reaction will proceed to achieve equilibrium
• The ratios of the concentrations of reactants and products when equilibrium is reached
Inserting the initial values of reactants and products into the equilibrium expression we get the
following: = (0.600)2/((2.77)*(0.167)3) = 27.9
How does this number compare to the value of the equilibrium constant at this temperature?
• The "initial value of the equilibrium constant" is 27.9, at equilibrium we know that this must
decrease to 0.105
• For the value of Kc to decrease to the experimentally expected value at equilibrium, the
concentration of NH3(g) must decrease, and/or the concentrations of N2(g) and H2(g) must
increase
o Therefore, the reaction would have to proceed to the left (increasing reactants and
decreasing product concentrations)
7
When we substituted the initial values for the concentrations of the reactants and products into the
equilibrium expression the number we came up with is called the Reaction Quotient (Q) (i.e. "the
initial value of the equilibrium constant")
• If Q = Kc, then the system is already at equilibrium
• If Q > Kc, then essentially we have too much product and the reaction will proceed to the left
(to reduce the concentration of product and increase the concentration of product)
• If Q < Kc, then essentially we have too little product and the reaction will proceed to the right
(to produce more product and decrease the concentration of reactant)
In a sample of N2(g), H2(g) and NH3(g) at equilibrium in a Haber reaction the partial pressure of the
H2(g) is 1.32 atm, and the partial pressure of the N2(g) is 0.648 atm. What is the partial pressure of the
NH3(g) in the equilibrium mixture?
In this problem we have a homogeneous equilibrium of gases and the equilibrium constant, Kp, is
given in terms of partial pressures of the component gases.
• For this reaction, the definition of Kp is given as
• The equilibrium partial pressures of H2(g) and N2(g) are given, as is the value for Kp
1.45 x 10-5 = (PNH3)2 / ((0.648)*(1.32)3)
• We can solve for the partial pressure of NH3(g)
PNH3 = (2.16 x 10-5)1/2
PNH3 = 4.64 x 10-3 atm
If there is any doubt that we have done the calculations correctly, we can substitute this value (along
with the equilibrium partial pressures for H2(g) and N2(g)) into the equilibrium expression and make
sure that we get the correct value for Kp
• We may have more than one possible solution for x, but only one will make sense
Quadratic solutions: X = 0.119 or -0.124 (can't have a negative value). Therefore, the equilibrium
concentrations are:
N2(g) = (5.75 - 0.119) = 5.63M
O2(g) = (4.89 - 0.119) = 4.77M
NO(g) = (2 * 0.119) = 0.238M
Note: plugging these values back into the equilibrium constant expression will allow us to check our
answer:
Kc = [NO]2 / ([N2][O2]) = (0.238)2 / (5.63)(4.77)
Kc = 2.11 x 10-3
(this is pretty close considering round off errors)
Next, calculate the reaction quotient, Q, to figure out whether the reaction will go to the right or left to
attain equilibrium:
Q = (0.25)2 / ((0.9)*(0.1)3)
Q = 69.4
• Q = 69.4 is a lot larger than the value of Kc = 0.105. Therefore, we are starting out with too
much product and the reaction will proceed to the left, to produce more reactant.
When the reaction does goes to the left, as predicted by the reaction quotient, the breakdown of NH3(g)
product to produce N2(g) and H2(g) reactants will follow the stoichiometry of the balanced equation:
N2(g) + 3H2(g) <=> 2NH3(g)
• Thus, for every mole of NH3(g) that decomposes, 0.5 mole of N2(g) will be produced and 1.5
mole of H2(g) will be produced
• We know that a certain amount of NH3(g) will have to break down in order for the reaction to
achieve equilibrium. We can set this unknown amount to a variable, x
Thus, the concentrations of H2(g), N2(g) and NH3(g) at equilibrium will equal the following:
• Equilibrium concentration of NH3(g) = (starting concentration - amount that decomposes)
= 0.25M - x
• Equilibrium concentration of H2(g) = (starting concentration + (1.5 * amount of NH3(g) that
decomposes))
= 0.1M + 1.5x
• Equilibrium concentration of N2(g) = (starting concentration + (0.5 * amount of NH3(g) that
decomposes))
= 0.9M + 0.5x
The above amounts describe the equilibrium concentrations of the reactants and products and can
therefore be inserted into the description of the equilibrium expression, and are set equal to the value
for Kc:
• The first solution (a negative value for x) does not make any sense because product must be
degraded not increased. So we can exclude this solution
• The starting concentration of NH3(g) is 0.25M. The equilibrium concentration is (0.25M - x).
The equilibrium concentration cannot be less than 0. Therefore, any solution greater than 0.25
is meaningless (i.e. incorrect)
10
• This leaves only one possible solution, x = 0.178M. Thus the equilibrium concentrations of the
various components in the reaction are:
o Equilibrium concentration of NH3(g) = (0.25M - 0.178) = 0.072M
o Equilibrium concentration of H2(g) = (0.1M + 1.5*0.178) = 0.367M
o Equilibrium concentration of N2(g) = (0.9M + 0.5*0.178) = 0.989M
• Finally, we can check our answer by plugging these values into the equation for the equilibrium
constant and making sure we get the right answer (i.e. 0.105 in this case)
IV Le Châtelier's Principle
In order to try to figure out how to optimize the production of ammonia from hydrogen and nitrogen,
Haber studied the equilibrium concentrations of ammonia in his famous process:
N2(g) + 3H2(g) <=> 2NH3(g)
• He noted the equilibrium concentration of ammonia at different temperatures (while keeping
pressure constant)
• He also noted the equilibrium concentration of ammonia at different pressures (while keeping
the temperature constant)
What has happened to the equilibrium of the system in response to the added H2(g)?
• Prior to the addition of H2(g) the system is in equilibrium. This can be seen because the
concentrations of the different components do not change with time (the forward and reverse
rates must be equal)
• When the H2(g) is added, we see that the system responds by consuming N2(g) and producing
NH3(g).
Forward rate = k1 [N2] [H2]3
• The production of NH3(g) requires both N2(g) and H2(g) as reactants. Therefore, the production
of NH3(g) not only consumes N2(g) but also H2(g)
The addition of H2(g) causes the balance of the system to shift in favor of the forward reaction (i.e. the
production of NH3(g) from N2(g) and H2(g). Thus, some of the added H2(g) is consumed, and thus, the
system responds to counteract the perturbation caused by the added H2(g)
N2 + 3H2 2NH3
(reaction is driven "to the right" by the effects of added H2)
• After some time, the system reaches a new state of equilibrium. It will not be identical to the
original state, however. Although the system has responded to resist the effects of the added
H2(g), the new equilibrium state contains a slightly higher concentration of NH3(g), and slightly
lower concentration of N2(g) (as well as a slightly higher concentration of H2(g).
The overall ratio of [NH3]2/([N2]*[H2] 3) is the same as before at equilibrium (i.e. the value of Kc does
not change)
What would happen if we repeated the experiment, but added NH3(g) instead of H2(g)?
• The system would respond by decomposing some of the added NH3(g) and a new equilibrium
condition would be established (with slightly higher concentrations of H2(g) and N2(g) - as well
as slightly higher equilibrium concentrations of NH3(g).
Reverse rate = k-1 [NH3]2
12
• At the new equilibrium the concentrations of reactants and product is slightly different from
before, but Kc has the same value
• Although the activation energy barrier is a different magnitude for the forward and reverse
reactions, the change in the activation energy (∆Ea) is the same for both the forward and
reverse reactions
• Therefore, a catalyst changes the rate at which equilibrium is achieved, but does not change the
composition of the equilibrium mixture (i.e. does not alter the equilibrium constant, K)