Sie sind auf Seite 1von 11

International Journal of Research p-ISSN: 2348-6848

e-ISSN: 2348-795X
Available at https://edupediapublications.org/journals
Volume 03 Issue 14
October 2016

Design and Structural Analysis of Heavy-Duty Chassis


AUTHOR’S PROFILE:

MEGAVATH VENNELA KUMARI

Student Details:Department of Mechanical

MTech Student

Department of Mechanical,

Professor Details:Mr.Rahulji dala

Assistant Professor

SREE DATTHA INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE

Sheriguda(V),Ibrahimpatnam(M), Rangareddy(D)

TELANGANA,501510
ABSTRACT deformations and stress efficiency of the

A frame is the main structure of components Appling the existing material

the chassis of a motor vehicle. All other (Mild-Steel) and chosen material

components fasten to it; a term for this (composite material-Epoxy & S2 glass).

design is body-on-frame construction. To showing the comparison between two

A chassis consists of an materials for components when the

internal framework that supports a man- compressible loads are different.

made object in its construction and use. It INTRODUCTION

is analogous to an animal's skeleton.


CHASSIS: - A chassis consists of an
The main objective of the project is how to
internal framework that supports a man-
develop the prototype of Heavy Duty
Chassis with two different types of made object in its construction and use. It
sections (C & I )of heavy-duty vehicle is analogous to an animal's skeleton. An
using CAD tool CREO 2.0.These
example of a chassis is the under part of
assembly consists major components they
are main frame (stiffeners, longerons) a motor vehicle, consisting of the frame
with required dimensions. . (on which the body is mounted). If

And importing the components which the running gear such as wheels and
are developed in CAD tool into CAE tool
transmission, and sometimes even the
ANSYS for to analyze. To find out the

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/IJR/ P a g e | 4575


International Journal of Research p-ISSN: 2348-6848
e-ISSN: 2348-795X
Available at https://edupediapublications.org/journals
Volume 03 Issue 14
October 2016

driver's seat, are included then the assembly is described as a rolling chassis.

A frame is the main structure of For commercial vehicles, a rolling

the chassis of a motor vehicle. All other chassis consists of an assembly of all the

components fasten to it; a term for this essential parts of a truck (without the

design is body-on-frame construction. body) to be ready for operation on the

road. The design of a pleasure car chassis


In the case of vehicles, the term rolling
will be different than one for commercial
chassis means the frame plus the "running
vehicles because of the heavier loads and
gear" like engine, transmission, drive
constant work use. Commercial vehicle
shaft, differential, and suspension.
manufacturers sell "chassis only", "cowl
An under body (sometimes referred to as
and chassis", as well as "chassis cab"
"coachwork"), which is usually not
versions that can be outfitted with
necessary for integrity of the structure, is
specialized bodies. These include motor
built on the chassis to complete the
homes, fire engines, ambulances, box
vehicle.
trucks, etc.

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/IJR/ P a g e | 4576


International Journal of Research p-ISSN: 2348-6848
e-ISSN: 2348-795X
Available at https://edupediapublications.org/journals
Volume 03 Issue 14
October 2016

In particular applications, such as school chassis is mounted inside a heavy, rigid

buses, a government agency like National cabinet, while in other designs such as

Highway Traffic Safety modern computer cases, lightweight

Administration (NHTSA) in the U.S. covers or panels are attached to the

defines the design standards of chassis and chassis.

body conversions. The combination of chassis and outer

An armoured fighting vehicle's hull serves covering is sometimes called an enclosure.

as the chassis and comprises the bottom The main functions of a frame in motor
part of the AFV that includes the tracks, vehicles are: -
engine, driver's seat, and crew
FUNCTION: -
compartment. This describes the lower

hull, although common usage might 1. To support the vehicle's chassis

include the upper hull to mean the AFV components and body

without the turret. The hull serves as a 2. To deal with static and dynamic

basis for platforms on tanks, armoured loads, without undue deflection or

personnel carriers, combat engineering distortion.

vehicles, etc These include:

In an electronic device, the chassis consists


 Weight of the body,
of a frame or other internal supporting
passengers, and cargo loads.
structure on which the circuit boards and
 Vertical and torsional twisting
other electronics are mounted. In the
transmitted by going over
absence of a metal frame, the chassis refers
uneven surfaces.
to the circuit boards and components
 Transverse lateral forces
themselves, not the physical structure. In
caused by road conditions, side
some designs, such as older sets, the
wind, and steering the vehicle.

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/IJR/ P a g e | 4577


International Journal of Research p-ISSN: 2348-6848
e-ISSN: 2348-795X
Available at https://edupediapublications.org/journals
Volume 03 Issue 14
October 2016

 Torque from the engine and There are three main

transmission. designs for frame rails. Normally the

 Longitudinal tensile forces material of construction for chassis and

from starting and acceleration, along with frame is carbon steel alloys or

as well as compression from aluminium Alloys (Light Weight frames).

braking. Their cross-sections include:

 Sudden impacts from

collisions.

1. C-shaped

2. Boxed

3. Hat

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/IJR/ P a g e | 4578


International Journal of Research p-ISSN: 2348-6848
e-ISSN: 2348-795X
Available at https://edupediapublications.org/journals
Volume 03 Issue 14
October 2016

trucks, and heavy trucks. Above this there

are specialised very heavy trucks and

transporters such as heavy haulers for

moving oversized loads, and off-road

heavy trucks used in and mining which are

too large for highway use without escorts


TRUCK: -
and special permits.
A truck is a motor vehicle designed to
HEAVY TRUCKS: -
transport cargo. Trucks vary greatly in

size, power, and configuration, with the Except for semi-trailer trucks and,

smallest being mechanically similar to generally, mobile cranes, the following

an automobile. types may also come in medium sizes.

Almost all trucks share a common

construction: they are made of

a CHASSIS, a cab, an area for

placing cargo,

equipment, axles, suspension and road

wheels, an engine and a drive

train. Pneumatic, hydraulic, water,


In Heavy trucks: -
and electrical systems may also be present.
Tatra is a vehicle manufacturer
Many also tow one or
in Kopřivnice, Czech Republic. The
more trailers or semi-trailers.
company was founded in 1850 as
TYPES OF TRUCKS: -
Schustala & Company, later renamed

The three main classifications for road Nesselsdorfer Wagenbau-

truck by weight are light trucks, medium Fabriksgesellschaft when it became a

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/IJR/ P a g e | 4579


International Journal of Research p-ISSN: 2348-6848
e-ISSN: 2348-795X
Available at https://edupediapublications.org/journals
Volume 03 Issue 14
October 2016

wagon and carriage manufacturer. Tatra is axial life estimations are also presented. In

the third oldest car maker in the world 2007, Ye and Moan [2] discussed static

after Daimler and Peugeot. During World and fatigue behavior of three types of

War II Tatra was instrumental in the aluminum boxstiffener/web connections

production of trucks, and tank engines for are investigated in this study. The main

the German war effort. purposes are to provide a connection

solution that can reduce the fabrication


Tatra produces a range of
costs by changing the cutting shapes on the
primarily all-wheel-drive 4×4, 6×6, 8×8,
web frame and correspondingly the weld
10×10, and 12×12 trucks.
process and meanwhile sufficient fatigue
LITERATURE REVIEW
strength can be achieved. Finite element

Hoffmeyer et al. in 2006 [1] discussed analyses (FEA) show the influence of local

some issues in multi axial fatigue and life geometry and weld parameters on the

estimation is presented. While not intended stress gradient near the fatigue cracking

to be comprehensive, these are a relatively area. The influence of the weld parameters

broad range of issues which are commonly on the structural stress concentration

encountered when dealing with multi axial factors is also studied. Twelve specimens

fatigue. They include damage mechanisms, of every type were tested and the test data

non-proportional hardening and are compared both to a nominal stress

constitutive behavior, damage parameters based design SN curve Eurocode9/31 and

and life estimation, variable amplitude a structural stress based design SN curve

loading, cycle counting, damage Eurocode9/44. RoslanAbd Rahman et al.

accumulation, and mixed-mode crack [3] conducted stress analysis of heavy duty

growth. Some simple approximations in truck chassis by utilizing a commercial

capturing some of these effects in multi finite element package ABAQUS. To

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/IJR/ P a g e | 4580


International Journal of Research p-ISSN: 2348-6848
e-ISSN: 2348-795X
Available at https://edupediapublications.org/journals
Volume 03 Issue 14
October 2016

determine critical point so that by design Element Method (FEM) can be used to

modifications the stresses can be reduces locate the critical point which has the

to improve the fatigue life of components. highest stress. Critical point is one of the

During this he uses ASTM low alloy steel factors that may cause the fatigue failure.

a 710 C (Class 3) with 552 MPa of yield The magnitude of the stress can used to

strength and 620 MPa of tensile strength predict the life span of the truck chassis.

for chassis founds the maximum stress The stress analysis is accomplished using

386.9 MPa at critical point occurred at the commercial finite element packaged

opening of chassis This critical point is ABAQUS by Veloso et al. [5]. They

located at element 86104 and node 16045, discussed the failure investigation and

which is in contacted with the bolt from stress analysis of a longitudinal stringer of

this he concludes that this critical point is an automobile chassis Fiat Automóveis,

an initial to probable failure. Kurdi et al. in Rod. Fernão Dias, km 429, Betim, MG,

2008, [4] discussed about the one of the Brazil Pontifical Catholic University of

most important steps in development of a Minas Gerais (PUC Minas), Mechanical

new truck chassis is the prediction of Engineering, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

fatigue life span and durability loading of A prototype vehicle was submitted to

the chassis frame. The age of many truck durability test, on road at a proving ground

chassis in Malaysia are of more than 20 test track. Failures of posterior

years and there is always a question arising longitudinal stringers were observed

whether the chassis is still safe to use. during this test. Cracks were nucleated on

Thus, fatigue study and life prediction on these stringers during durability test,

the chassis is necessary in order to verify before the designed life of these

the safety of this chassis during its components is reached. These cracks were

operation. Stress analysis using Finite observed at nearly the bumpers fixation

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/IJR/ P a g e | 4581


International Journal of Research p-ISSN: 2348-6848
e-ISSN: 2348-795X
Available at https://edupediapublications.org/journals
Volume 03 Issue 14
October 2016

points of the vehicle suspension. Loads are frame which has worked in bad condition

transmitted by wheels to the body of the for 3 to 5 months. The sub-frame was

vehicle through the suspension analyzed by ANSYS and the reason for the

components. Thus, the longitudinal cracking of the frame was found according

stringers are subjected to these localized to the different stress. At last an

cyclic stresses. Also, Palma et al. in2009 improvement and optimization to the

[6] investigated to analyze the fatigue structures of the frame was provided. Also

behavior of an automobile body part, Hengji et al. in 2012 [8] explained the

according to the standards of performance. fatigue life for frame of the 220t mining

The methodology is based on experiments dump truck, a fatigue life analysis method

performed on a rear trailer tow hook pin of was presented by integrating multi body

a passenger automobile vehicle. dynamic analysis and finite element

Experiments were performed simulating method. The forces of main joints at frame

the actual conditions in the customer were measured from the multi body

environment. Stress and strain were dynamic model, whose road was

experimentally measured by using strain restructured. The dynamic stress test of the

gages, bonded on assembly critical points. whole truck was implemented to obtain the

Besides, stress analysis was also peak stress of the mainly forced area,

performed using a finite element program. which was compared with the simulated

Fatigue analysis is used to access and to stress. It was found out that the error was

compare the fatigue damage imposed allowable so that the accuracy of the finite

during laboratory experiments. Recently in element model was definitely ensured. The

2011, Chen and Zhu [7] studied the quasi-static stress analysis method was

YJ3128-type dump truck‟s sub-frames, for employed to acquire stress influence

the fatigue crack occurred in the Sub- coefficient under unit load, which was

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/IJR/ P a g e | 4582


International Journal of Research p-ISSN: 2348-6848
e-ISSN: 2348-795X
Available at https://edupediapublications.org/journals
Volume 03 Issue 14
October 2016

associated with load histories of the frame Side bar of the chassis are made from “C”

to get the dangerous stress area. The Channels with200mm x50mm x25 mm

fatigue life of the frame was calculated on Front Overhang (a) = 740 mm Rear

the basis of Palmgren–Miner damage Overhang (c) = 1400 mm Wheel Base (b)

theory. It was turned out that the minimum = 6670 mm Material of the chassis is St 52

life area of the frame is located at the E = 2.10 x 105 N / mm2 Total load acting

frame joints of suspension, which matches on chassis = Capacity of the Chassis +

the practice. More recently, Bhat et al. in Weight of body and engine=

2014 [9], redesigned a modified chassis for (25000+600+400+200)*9.81 = 257022N

tractor trolley. The existing trolley chassis Chassis has two beams.

designed by industry uses „C‟ Cross


So load acting on each beam is half
section having dimension 200mm x 75mm
of the Load acting on the single frame =
x 7mm and the material used was mild
357022 / 2 = 1285110 N / Beam Chassis is
steel. By keeping the material and
simply clamp with Shock Absorber and
dimension similar and using „I‟ cross
Leaf Spring. So Chassis is a Simply
section area instead of „C‟ resulted in
Supported Beam with uniformly
more safer stresses than „C‟ and 31.79kg
distributed load. Load acting on Entire
reduction in weight. They concluded that
span of the beam is 128511 Length of the
the Reduction in weight shows that raw
Beam is 8810 mm. Uniformly Distributed
material required for manufacturing of the
Load is 1285110/ 8810 =114.58 N/mm
Chassis was reduced. Also, they obtained
Safety factor= yield stress/ working
safer stresses in new suggested design and
stress = 250/114.58=2.19 the
increase in factor of safety obtained in new
safety factor is greater than 1 so object is
suggested design
safe.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/IJR/ P a g e | 4583


International Journal of Research p-ISSN: 2348-6848
e-ISSN: 2348-795X
Available at https://edupediapublications.org/journals
Volume 03 Issue 14
October 2016

CONCLUSION

Side bar of the chassis are made from “I” In This Project Heavy Duty Chassis 3D model

Channels with150mm x50mm x20 mm is done by using Pro-E with different cross

Front Overhang (a) = 740 mm Rear sections with dimensions. And analysis is done

by using ANSYS. In analysis part the chosen


Overhang (c) = 1400 mm Wheel Base (b)
materials are M-S & Composite Material
= 6670 mm Material of the chassis is St 52
(Epoxy-S2 Glass) are applied to chassis in
E = 2.10 x 105 N / mm2 Total load acting
Ansys.
on chassis = Capacity of the Chassis +
In this project we applied two different
Weight of body and engine=
boundary conditions for both chassis. For c-
(25000+600+400+200)*9.81 = 307022N
section chassis we applied only 10e5N and for
Chassis has two beams.
i-section chassis we applied 30e5N and

So load acting on each beam is half calculating results like deformation, stress,

of the Load acting on the single frame = safety factor values. For this we got maximum

307022 / 2 = 1585110 N / Beam Chassis is stress values 117.59 Mpa for c-section and

simply clamp with Shock Absorber and 172.59Mpa for i-section chassis but both

chassis were safe at this stress. In this case we


Leaf Spring. So Chassis is a Simply
got same stress values for 2 materials. And the
Supported Beam with uniformly
strength is very high for epoxy s2 glass.
distributed load. Load acting on Entire

span of the beam is 128511 Length of the Finally we can conclude here the both chassis

cross sections were safe at their respective


Beam is 8810 mm. Uniformly Distributed
boundary conditions but when we compare
Load is 1585110/ 8810 =155.98 N/mm
both chassis the i-section has nearly 5 times
Safety factor= yield stress/ working stronger than c-section with mild steel.

stress = 500/155.98=3.22 the safety


RESULT: -
factor is greater than 1 so object is safe.

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/IJR/ P a g e | 4584


International Journal of Research p-ISSN: 2348-6848
e-ISSN: 2348-795X
Available at https://edupediapublications.org/journals
Volume 03 Issue 14
October 2016

M-S: - > Receiving less deformation 6. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatra_


comparing with Composite Material.
816.
> Low cost comparing with
Composite.

> Available at everywhere.

Epoxy & S2 glass.: -> Receiving high


deformation comparing with M-S.

> Highly Expensive


comparing with M-S.

> Available at Rare

Composite Material (Epoxy & S2


Glass) is Expensive Comparing with M-S
Material.

REFERENCES:-

1. http://www.agy.com/technical_info

/graphics_PDFs/HighStrengthTech

PaperEng.pdf

2. http://andrewbeard.wordpress.com/

2009/05/11/technology-carbon-

fiber-monocoque-chassis/

3. http://www.composites.northwester

n.edu/research/nanomulticomp/.

4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epoxy.

5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbo

n_fiber

Available online: http://edupediapublications.org/journals/index.php/IJR/ P a g e | 4585

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen