Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
e-ISSN: 2348-795X
Available at https://edupediapublications.org/journals
Volume 03 Issue 14
October 2016
MTech Student
Department of Mechanical,
Assistant Professor
Sheriguda(V),Ibrahimpatnam(M), Rangareddy(D)
TELANGANA,501510
ABSTRACT deformations and stress efficiency of the
the chassis of a motor vehicle. All other (Mild-Steel) and chosen material
components fasten to it; a term for this (composite material-Epoxy & S2 glass).
And importing the components which the running gear such as wheels and
are developed in CAD tool into CAE tool
transmission, and sometimes even the
ANSYS for to analyze. To find out the
driver's seat, are included then the assembly is described as a rolling chassis.
the chassis of a motor vehicle. All other chassis consists of an assembly of all the
components fasten to it; a term for this essential parts of a truck (without the
buses, a government agency like National cabinet, while in other designs such as
as the chassis and comprises the bottom The main functions of a frame in motor
part of the AFV that includes the tracks, vehicles are: -
engine, driver's seat, and crew
FUNCTION: -
compartment. This describes the lower
include the upper hull to mean the AFV components and body
without the turret. The hull serves as a 2. To deal with static and dynamic
from starting and acceleration, along with frame is carbon steel alloys or
collisions.
1. C-shaped
2. Boxed
3. Hat
size, power, and configuration, with the Except for semi-trailer trucks and,
placing cargo,
wagon and carriage manufacturer. Tatra is axial life estimations are also presented. In
the third oldest car maker in the world 2007, Ye and Moan [2] discussed static
after Daimler and Peugeot. During World and fatigue behavior of three types of
production of trucks, and tank engines for are investigated in this study. The main
Hoffmeyer et al. in 2006 [1] discussed analyses (FEA) show the influence of local
some issues in multi axial fatigue and life geometry and weld parameters on the
estimation is presented. While not intended stress gradient near the fatigue cracking
to be comprehensive, these are a relatively area. The influence of the weld parameters
broad range of issues which are commonly on the structural stress concentration
encountered when dealing with multi axial factors is also studied. Twelve specimens
fatigue. They include damage mechanisms, of every type were tested and the test data
and life estimation, variable amplitude a structural stress based design SN curve
accumulation, and mixed-mode crack [3] conducted stress analysis of heavy duty
determine critical point so that by design Element Method (FEM) can be used to
modifications the stresses can be reduces locate the critical point which has the
to improve the fatigue life of components. highest stress. Critical point is one of the
During this he uses ASTM low alloy steel factors that may cause the fatigue failure.
a 710 C (Class 3) with 552 MPa of yield The magnitude of the stress can used to
strength and 620 MPa of tensile strength predict the life span of the truck chassis.
for chassis founds the maximum stress The stress analysis is accomplished using
386.9 MPa at critical point occurred at the commercial finite element packaged
opening of chassis This critical point is ABAQUS by Veloso et al. [5]. They
located at element 86104 and node 16045, discussed the failure investigation and
which is in contacted with the bolt from stress analysis of a longitudinal stringer of
this he concludes that this critical point is an automobile chassis Fiat Automóveis,
an initial to probable failure. Kurdi et al. in Rod. Fernão Dias, km 429, Betim, MG,
2008, [4] discussed about the one of the Brazil Pontifical Catholic University of
new truck chassis is the prediction of Engineering, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
fatigue life span and durability loading of A prototype vehicle was submitted to
the chassis frame. The age of many truck durability test, on road at a proving ground
years and there is always a question arising longitudinal stringers were observed
whether the chassis is still safe to use. during this test. Cracks were nucleated on
Thus, fatigue study and life prediction on these stringers during durability test,
the chassis is necessary in order to verify before the designed life of these
the safety of this chassis during its components is reached. These cracks were
operation. Stress analysis using Finite observed at nearly the bumpers fixation
points of the vehicle suspension. Loads are frame which has worked in bad condition
transmitted by wheels to the body of the for 3 to 5 months. The sub-frame was
vehicle through the suspension analyzed by ANSYS and the reason for the
components. Thus, the longitudinal cracking of the frame was found according
cyclic stresses. Also, Palma et al. in2009 improvement and optimization to the
[6] investigated to analyze the fatigue structures of the frame was provided. Also
behavior of an automobile body part, Hengji et al. in 2012 [8] explained the
according to the standards of performance. fatigue life for frame of the 220t mining
The methodology is based on experiments dump truck, a fatigue life analysis method
performed on a rear trailer tow hook pin of was presented by integrating multi body
Experiments were performed simulating method. The forces of main joints at frame
the actual conditions in the customer were measured from the multi body
environment. Stress and strain were dynamic model, whose road was
experimentally measured by using strain restructured. The dynamic stress test of the
gages, bonded on assembly critical points. whole truck was implemented to obtain the
Besides, stress analysis was also peak stress of the mainly forced area,
performed using a finite element program. which was compared with the simulated
Fatigue analysis is used to access and to stress. It was found out that the error was
compare the fatigue damage imposed allowable so that the accuracy of the finite
during laboratory experiments. Recently in element model was definitely ensured. The
2011, Chen and Zhu [7] studied the quasi-static stress analysis method was
the fatigue crack occurred in the Sub- coefficient under unit load, which was
associated with load histories of the frame Side bar of the chassis are made from “C”
to get the dangerous stress area. The Channels with200mm x50mm x25 mm
fatigue life of the frame was calculated on Front Overhang (a) = 740 mm Rear
the basis of Palmgren–Miner damage Overhang (c) = 1400 mm Wheel Base (b)
theory. It was turned out that the minimum = 6670 mm Material of the chassis is St 52
life area of the frame is located at the E = 2.10 x 105 N / mm2 Total load acting
the practice. More recently, Bhat et al. in Weight of body and engine=
tractor trolley. The existing trolley chassis Chassis has two beams.
CONCLUSION
Side bar of the chassis are made from “I” In This Project Heavy Duty Chassis 3D model
Channels with150mm x50mm x20 mm is done by using Pro-E with different cross
Front Overhang (a) = 740 mm Rear sections with dimensions. And analysis is done
So load acting on each beam is half calculating results like deformation, stress,
of the Load acting on the single frame = safety factor values. For this we got maximum
307022 / 2 = 1585110 N / Beam Chassis is stress values 117.59 Mpa for c-section and
simply clamp with Shock Absorber and 172.59Mpa for i-section chassis but both
span of the beam is 128511 Length of the Finally we can conclude here the both chassis
REFERENCES:-
1. http://www.agy.com/technical_info
/graphics_PDFs/HighStrengthTech
PaperEng.pdf
2. http://andrewbeard.wordpress.com/
2009/05/11/technology-carbon-
fiber-monocoque-chassis/
3. http://www.composites.northwester
n.edu/research/nanomulticomp/.
4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epoxy.
5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbo
n_fiber