Sie sind auf Seite 1von 7

Nov.

, 1937 SOME HEATSOF IONIZATION 2365

little with the ionic strength of the solution. Its found is -0.7701 v. The electromotive force
value between p = 0.5 and 1.0 may be considered data have been corrected for hydrolysis of ferric
to be -0.741 v. iron and plotted in such a way that errors from
Acknowledgment.-For various helpful sug- liquid junction potentials and changing activity
gestions and for assistance in the interpretation of coefficients are removed by extrapolation.
the experimental data we are glad to acknowledge A table of values of the formal ferric-ferrous
our indebtedness to Professor George Scatchard electrode potential of Fe(C104)3-Fe(C104)2mix-
of this Institute. tures in HClO4 solution from an ionic strength of
0.1 to 1.0 has been prepared. For the ionic
Summary strength range 0.5 to 1.0, the value is -0.741 v.
The molal ferric-ferrous electrode potential A new method for the determination of free
has been obtained from electromotive force meas- acid in the presence of ferrous and ferric iron is
urements in perchloric acid solution of cells of the described,
type described in the introduction. The value CAMBRIDGE,
MASS. RECEIVED
JULY 28, 1937

[CONTRIBUTION FROM T H E CHEMICAL LABORATORY


OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ]

The Heats of Ionization of Water, Ammonium Hydroxide, Carbonic, Phosphoric, and


Sulfuric Acids. The Variation of Ionization Constants with Temperature and the
Entropy Change with Ionization
' BY KENNETHS. PITZER~
In addition to their value as thermochemical The calorimeter itself consists of a Pyrex vacuum flask
data, these heats of ionization make possible the with a ground glass joint in the neck. Into this fits a
stopper which is also evacuated, and which carries the
calculation of the changes of entropy with ioniza- electrical leads and stirrer through a central tube of small
tion] and the entropies of some of the ions in- diameter. Thus, when the flask is so filled that the water
volved. The latter calculations will be presented surface is just up in the small central tube, there is little
in another paper. Also it is found that certain opportunity for evaporation. The flask is 25 cm. long and
approximate generalizations can be made con- has a volume of 885 ml. The entire unit is completely sub-
merged in a water thermostat controlled to within 0.003'
cerning the change in entropy and heat capacity during a single run. For heat of solution measurements the
with ionization, and that these results lead to sample is placed in a very thin glass bulb sealed with
equations for the variation of ionization constants paraffin on to a glass rod which in turn slides through
with temperature. the hollow stirrer shaft. An additional propeller is
Throughout this paper a defined calorie equal placed just above the sample where it will be most effective
after the bulb has been broken against the bottom of the
to 4.1833 international joules will be used, and flask When two solutions are to be mixed one is used a t
extrapolations to infinite dilution will be made relatively high concentration and placed in a glass tube
consistent with the Debye-Hiickel theory. The with silver disks sealed into its ends by means of paraffin.
uncertainties given for the various results are from This is supported just below the stirrer through which a
two to three times the probable errors and should, rod may be thrust, breaking the seals.
-4resistance thermometer consisting of 96 ohms of no.
therefore, outline a region within which the true 38 silk insulated copper wire and a heater composed of
value almost certainly lies. An attempt has 100 ohms of no. 30 rnanganin are wound on a silver tube
been made to include all possible sources of error, 5.2 cm. in diameter and 16 cm. long. The leads are of no.
including questionable assumptions and estimates 24 manganin and no. 24 copper, respectively, and single
made as part of the calculations. in each case. The windings are afforded protection by a
cover of thin silver welded in place. This thermometer
Apparatus.-The chief aim in the design of this calorime-
serves also as a stirrer tube which with its large surface
ter was the attainment of high sensitivity in tempera- gives excellent heat exchange.
ture determination. This makes possible heat of reaction The electrical circuits are shown in Fig. 1. The three
measurements a t sufficiently low concentration so that
constant arms of the thermometer bridge are of man-
heats of dilution may be estimated without too great un-
ganin, wound in a manner similar to the thermometer itself
certainty. Another feature is the economy in electrical and submerged in a three-liter oil-bath. The heat ex-
equipment.
change is such that a current of 0.01 amp. may be used if
(1) Shell Research Fellow, Academic Year, 1936-193i. desired. The connections to the thermometer have so low
2366 KENNETHS. PITZER VOl. 59

a resistance that moderate temperature changes introduce bon dioxide was of no significance, the distilled water was
a negligible error. The only switch contacts in this boiled and was protected from the air thereafter. The
circuit are in the parallel, adjustable resistance, R, which preparation of the other solutions which were used was
is a high grade Leeds and Northrup resistance box with carried out in a similar fashion, except that in several
10,000, 1000, 100, and IO-ohm dials. With this set a t cases less precise analyses sufficed.
20,000 ohms or more, contact resistances are estimated The Heat of Ionization of Water.-The best
to introduce errors of less than 0.00003°in the tempera-
tures. available value for the heat of ionization of water
Although the use of a measuring current of 0.01 amp. is that obtained by Rossini12after a review of the
makes the resistance thermometer sensitive to O.OOOO1°, available data, principally that of Richards and
and the temperature drift before and after heating is co-workers. The value thus obtained for 1s"
consistent t o about this amount, the results of calibration (AH' = 13,709 * 16 cal.) seems quite satisfac-
runs with a temperature rise of 0.1' spread over about
0.0003', which suggests that the temperature readings
tory; however, the temperature coefficient is
after comparatively large changes are reproducible only somewhat uncertain. Rossini3 has also reviewed
to that accuracy. For this reason a smaller measuring the available data on the heat capacities of aque-
current, say 0.003 amp., may be used without loss of ac- ous solutions, but the extrapolations to infinite
curacy and with a reduction in heating. dilution were carried out in a manner not entirely
, consistent with the Debye-Huckel theory. The
.____
'I/ recent work of Gulbransen and Robinson4 and
Young and Machins on the relative heat capacity
of sodium chloride solutions establishes the valid-
ity of the limiting form of the Debye-Hiickel
theory for heat capacities in the very dilute region,
and, moreover, gives probably the best value for
the limiting slope. Consequently, it seemed de-
sirable to recalculate the heat capacity of the
pertinent aqueous solutions making use of this
more recent information. The data for lithium,
Fig. 1.-Resistance thermometer and heater circuits for sodium, and potassium chlorides and hydroxides,
the calorimeter. and hydrochloric acid appeared most reliable in the
The heater circuit is very simple, its chief requirements dilute region and were therefore employed. The
being that the resistances of the heater and the comparing experimental values of the apparent molal heat
standard be known accurately. These were calibrated by capacity (ac)were plotted against the square root
comparison with standard resistances of nearly equal re- of the molality as in Fig. 2. Three requirements
sistance, a White potentiometer being used for this
were imposed in drawing the curves : first, that all
purpose. The electrically actuated timing switch is so
connected to a timing circuit from the University Observa- experimental data be fitted within their reason-
tory that it may be thrown on any given second with a n able uncertainties; second, that the limiting slope
error of not more than one or two hundredths of a second. d Q c / d 4 Z equal 8.0 (this is an average value ob-
Materials.-The chemicals used were all of "c. P." tained from both heat of dilution and dielectric
grade and were pwified further if necessary. The hydro-
chloric acid was redistilled in an all-glass still, diluted with
constant data) ; and, third, that the heat capaci-
freshly distilled water, and stored in a bottle which pre- ties at infinite dilution be the sums of those of the
viously had contained hydrochloric acid for a period of individual ions. These criteria fortunately leave
at least one year. Analysis by weighing precipitated but little uncertainity in the course of the heat
silver chloride gave as the average of three detennina-
tions 1.1414 * 0.0001 moles of hydrochloric acid per kg. TABLE I
of soh. The series of experiments on the heat of ioniza- MOLAL IONS AT
HEATCAPACITIES OF AQUEOUS INFINITE
tion of water was completed within three weeks after DILUTION AND 25'
making up a fresh solution, thus avoiding any possible (Potassium and Chloride Assumed Equal)
errors due to reaction of the acid with the glass. The Ion ai, cal./deg. Ion a:, cal./deg.
sodium hydroxide solution was carefully freed from car- K+ -14.1 H' -15.9
bonate by the addition of a very slight excess of barium Na+ - 7.5 OH - -16.1
hydroxide. A paraffin-lined bottle was used t o hold the Li + - 2.4 c1- -14.1
sodium hydroxide solution, which was analyzed by
( 2 ) Rossini, Bur. Standards J . Research, 6, 847 (1931).
comparison with the hydrochloric acid. Weight burets
(3) Rossini, i b i d . , I , 47 (1931).
were used except for experiments where the precision (4) Gulbransen and Robinson, THISJOUKA'AL, 66, 2637 (1!)34J
needed was only about 1%. Unless the presence of car- (5) Young and Machin, ibrd , 68, 2254 (1936).
Nov., 1937 SOME
HEATSOF IONIZAT~ON 2367

capacity curves. The values for infinite dilution easily measured, the result being 352 * 8 cal. a t
are summarized in Table I. 25'. Since this result is subtracted from that for
Combining the values in Table I for hydrogen Equation (l), any constant errors will be removed
and hydroxide ions with the heat capacity of from the final value. Thus the value here ob-
water, one obtains for the reaction HtO = H+ f tained for the heat of the dilution of hydrochloric
OH-, AC; = -50.0 cal./deg. at 25' and, using acid indicated in Equation (2) is t o be preferred for
Rossini's results, d(AC;)/dT = 0.3 and AHo = the present calculations even though equally ac-
13,709 cal./mole a t Bo,one finds AHo = 13,352 curate values have been given previ~usly.~The
+
-50.0(t - 25) 0.15(t - 25)2 cal./mole. final calculation of the heat of ionization of water
While the error in the above value could hardly is summarized in Table 11.
be very large, nevertheless an accurate experi-
mental value for 25' seemed desirable. Conse-
quently, a single series of experiments was carried
out with the greatest care. The reactions whose
heats were measured are the following
HC1.46.5HnO + NaOH.1065.5HzO = NaC1~1113H~O
( 1)
HC1.46.5H20 + 1165.5H~O = HCI.1112H2O. (2)
The results for these reactions may then be com-
bined with the heats of dilution of HC1.1112
Hz0,6NaOH.1065.5H20,' and NaC1.1113H204 to
give the heat of neutralization a t infinite dilution,
or the heat of ionization of water.
In the heat of neutralization experiments
(Equation 1) the temperature intervals of the
reaction and calibration runs were made to coin- 0.0 0.4 0.8
cide as nearly as possible. The calculations were 4;.
made in the usual manner, using the rate of tem-
perature drift before and after heating periods to
correct for heat conduction to the thermostat and
other small losses or gains of heat. The average
of three experiments gave 13,828 f 12 cal. for the
heat of the reaction in Equation (1) at 25'. The
heat effect for Equation (2), being small, was
TABLE I1
THEHEATOF IONIZATION OF WATER
+
HC1.46.5H20 NaOH.1065.5H20 =
+
NaCI.1113H~O 13,828 * 12 cal. (1)
+
HC1.46.5HpO 1065.5HpO =
+
HCI.1112H20 352 * 8 cal. (2)
HCI.1112H~O +
mHp0 =
HCI,( +
lll2)HnO +
1UO d. (:1)
NaOH.1065.5H20 +
mHlO =
I

NaOH.( m + +
1065.5)H20 86 cal. (4)
0.0 0.4 0.8
NaCI.1113H20 +
-HnO = d&*
NaC!J( +
1113)H20 +
73 cal. (5) Fig. 2.-Apparent molal heat capacity of
(1)
HCl.(
+ + -
( 5 ) - (2) - (3) - (4) gives
1112)HzO +
NaOH.(
NaCl( m
-+ +
1065.5)H20 =
1113)H20 (6)
aqueous solutions8 at 25".

The result given in Table I1 is thus in excellent


+
4-( 4-1065.5) H2O 13,363 ,* 16 cal. agreement with that calculated above, and as the
or H@(1.) = H+(aq.) +
OH-(aq.) AH = 13,363 uncertainties in the two values are not signifi-
* 16 cal. ( 8 ) (a) NaCl and KC1, Randall and Rossini, Trns JOURNAL, 51,
(6) Landolt-BBrnstein, "Tabellen." 323 (1929). (b) LiCI, HC1 and KOH, Gucker and Schminke, ibid.,
(7) Rossini, B w . Standurds J . Research, 6, 791 (1031), converted 54, 1358 (1932). (c) LiOH and NaOH, Gucker and Schminke, ibid ,
to 230. 55, 1013 (1933). See ref. 3 for older data.
2368 KENNETHS. PITZER Vol. 69

TABLE I11
HEATSOF IONIZATION
Soln. (1) S o h . (2) Heat r Molal AHO, cal.
Vol. ( l ) , evolved, This Other “Best
ml. vol. (2) = 885-vol. (1) cat. research research value”
35 0.956 M N a O H 0.05 MNHaCl 29.4 * 0.5 865 * 30 .... 865 * 30
10
10
1.162 M H C l
1.162 M H C I 1 .Ol5 MNaHC03
:015 MNaHCOs
015 M Na2C03
26.6
46.7
*
*
.6
.5
1843
3500
*
*
60
100
. ...
....
1843
3500
* 60
* 100
15 1.000 M H C l .020 M NaHzP04 -9.0 * .5 -1950 * 80 -17509 -18W * 80
5 1.000 M H C l 6.8 * .3 800 * 80 7401° 800 * 80

15 1.000 M H C l 76.4 * .5 3500 * 500 .... 3500 500


.020 M NasP04
10 0.790 M hTa2SO4 1.000 M HC1 -45.1 * 1.0 -5200 * 500 -222911 -5200 * 500
TABLEIV
THERMODYNAMIC
CONSTANTS
FOR THE OF WEAKACIDSIN AQUEOUSSOLUTION
IONIZATION AT 25’

Acid
AHO,
cal./mole
AFO,
cal./mole
- ASO,
cal./deg. mole
- APp.
cal./deg. mole
Acetic’s -112 6,488 22.1 34
MetaboricI4 3,360 12,599 31.0 43
Butyric’s -691 6,574 24.4 46
Carbonic (1st)l6 1,843 8,683 22.9
Chloroa~eticl~ -1,170 3,900 17.0 35
ChlorouP -4,100 2,670 22.7
Formiclg - 13 5,120 17.2 41
Hypochlorousz0 3,320 10,100 22.8
Phosphoric ( l ~ t ) ~ - 1,880 2,898 16.0
Propionicz1 - 168 6,650 22.9 38
Sulfurous (lst)zz 4,000 2,725 22.6
Waterz3 13,358 19,093 19.24 (27)lZ 50
Carbonic (2d)z4 3,500 13,983 35.2
Phosphoric (2d)’O 800 9,830 30.3
Sulfuric (2d)” -5,200 2,620 26.3
Phosphoric (3d)26 3,500 16,300 43

cantly different, their average may be taken as a in error a t temperatures considerably above or
final “best” value below this region.
AH = 13,358 - 50.0(t - 25) + 0.15(t - 25)z cal./mole The Heats of Ionization of Ammonium Hy-
The uncertainty in this value appears to be about droxide, Carbonic, Phosphoric, and Sulfuric
12 cal. in or near the 18 to 2.5’ interval. It is Acids.-Because of the lack of accurate heat of
impossible to say how much this expression may be dilution data it was desirable to measure most of
(9) Nims, THIS JOURNAL, 66, I l l 0 (1934). these heat effects in very dilute solution, with re-
(10) Harned and Embree, ibid., 66, 10.50 (1934); Nims, ibid., 66, sulting loss of precision. Otherwise the estima-
1946 (1933).
(11) Hnmer, ibid., 66, 860 (1934). See also discussion below. tion of heats of dilution would have led to even
(12) The standard state of water is the 65 molal liquid. In order greater uncertainty. I n each case the heat of
to make the value for water comparable, a value of the entropy
R In 55 larger has been placed in parentheses. ionization itself was measured rather than the heat
(13) Harned and Ehlers, THISJOURNAL, 66, 652 (1933). of neutralization of the weak acid or base. The
(14) Owen, i b i d . , 66, 1695 (1934).
(15) Haraed and Sutherland, ibid., 68, 2039 (1934). latter method is less satisfactory because it gives
(16) Shedlovsky and MacInnes, ibid., 61, 1705 (1935). the desired heat of ionization, itself relatively
(17) Wright, i b i d . , 66, 314 (1934).
(18) Barnett, Thesis, University of California, 1935. small, as the difference between two large quanti-
(19) Harned and Embree, THISJOURNAL, 66, 1042 (1934). ties. As an example of the former method, the
(20) (a) Ingham and Morrison, J . Chem. Soc., 1200 (1933); (b)
Neumann and Miieller, Z . onorg. ollgem. Chcm., 186, 428 (1930). heat of ionization of ammonium hydroxide was
(21) Harned and Ehlers, T H ~JOURNAL, S 66, 2379 (1933). obtained by measuring the heat of reaction of
(22) (a) Johnstone and Leppla, ;bid., 66, 2233 (1934): (b) Roth
and Zeumer, Z . EZektrochem., 88, 164 (1932). sodium hydroxide with ammovium chloride in
(23) Harned and Mannweiler, THIS JOURNAL, 67, 1873 (1935). dilute aqueous solution. The final solution thus
(24) MacInnes and Belcher, ibid., 66, 2630 (1933).
(25) Prideaux and Ward, J. Chcnr. Soc., 196, 423 (1924). contains both sodium chloride (ionized) and am-
Nov., 1987 SOME HEATSOF IONIZATION 2369

monium hydroxide (principally un-ionized) ; how- The entropy of the gas molecule (HA) will
ever, the latter should not significantly affect the differ from that of the ion (A-) because of several
heat of dilution, except by change of the fraction factors. The increased mass of HA will contrib-
ionized. This is apparent when one considers that ute, a t most, about 0.1 cal./deg. mole. If A-
only long range, i. e., coulombic, forces should give is a non-linear polyatomic molecule, then no ro-
a heat of dilution in the range of low concentration. tational degrees of freedom will be lost, although
The experimental results are given in Table I11 the moments of inertia will be slightly changed.
together with values of the molal heats of ioniza- This will have only a small effect on the entropy.
tion at infinite dilution calculated therefrom. In In water, hypochlorous acid, and analogous mole-
these calculations, heats of dilution were taken cules the ion is linear and has then only two de-
from sources given above, or were estimated using grees of rotational freedom. The loss of the other
the Debye-Hiickel theory. Where the reaction rotation may mean a loss of the order of five cal./
was not complete, the amount of reaction was deg. mole in the entropy a t 25'. In all of the
calculated from the ionization constant, using es- molecules here considered, the removal of the
timated activity coefficients if necessary. hydrogen will mean the loss of two vibrations,
No comparisons will be made with the early both of such frequency that they contribute but
work of Thomsen, Berthelot, and others because slightly to the entropy, and, where one rotation of
of the difficulty of reducing their results to 25' and the entire molecule was not lost, an additional
infinite dilution, and because improved calori- vibration of torsional character will be lost. This,
metric methods have rendered their work com- of course, assumes that the two bonds of the oxy-
paratively inaccurate. gen atom adjacent to the hydrogen form an angle
The Entropy of Ionization of Weak Acids less than 180°, and that rotation of the OH group
with respect to the remainder of the molecule is
The changes in heat, free energy, entropy, and
appreciably hindered.28 This torsional vibratiorl
heat capacity with ionization are tabulated in
will contribute in the neighborhood of three cal./
Table IV for a number of weak acids. While an
deg. mole to the entropy. The symmetry number
exhaustive search of the literature has not been
may be changed by the ionization, thus contri-
made, it is believed that the values listed are in
buting a difference of the order of one cal./deg.
most cases the best available. On inspection of
mole. It is thus apparent that the entropy of the
the data in Table IV it is a t once apparent that
gas ion will be less than that of the neutral mole-
although A H and AF have values varying over a
cule, and in almost every case by an amount be-
wide range, A S and AC, are always negative, and
tween three and six cal./deg. mole.
for a first ionization have roughly the values -22
The difference in the entropies of solution is
and -40 cal./deg. mole, respectively. It is of
interest to note that rough theoretical considera- less easily discussed. In all the acids in Table IV
and, in fact, in almost all weak acids the ionizing
tions also lead to this result.
The entropy change in the reaction HA = proton is attached to an oxygen atom. Since the
H+ + A- may be taken as the absolute entropy acid is weak, one presumes tha most of the nega-
tive charge lies on this oxygen. Then, unless
of the hydrogen ion plus the entropy difference
some radical rearrangement of charge occurs on
between A- and HA. The absolute entropy of
the hydrogen ion is known accurately enough for ionization, we may consider the resulting negative
the present purpose from the value of Eastman ion as an essentially neutral molecule attached to
and Youngz6for the absolute entropy of chloride a charged oxygen atom. Applying now the ideas
ion, and the sum of the entropies of hydrogen and developed by Latimer and co-workers29 concern-
chloride ions given by Latimer, Schutz, and ing the entropy of solution of simple ions, one finds
The value thus obtained is -4.6 cal./ that the difference in entropies of solution will
arise from the compression, due to the electro-
deg. mole. The difference between the entropies
of the negative acid ion and neutral molecule in static field, of the water near the charged oxygen
solution may be considered as arising from the atom. Since the effective charge is probably less
difference in entropy of the gas ion and molecule, than one unit, and because the rest of the molecule
and the difference in their entropies of solution. (28) See Kemp and Pitzer, THISJOURNAL, 69, 276 (1937); Pitzer,
J . Chem. Phrs ,6,473 (1937).
(26) Young, M. B., Thesis, University of California, 1935. (29) (a) Latimer and Kasper, ibid , 61, 2293 (1929); (b) Latimer,
(27) Latimer, Schutz and Hicks, J . Chem. Phys., 2, 82 (1934). Chcm R e v , 18, 349 (1936).
2370 KENNETHS. PITZER VOl. 59

excludes water from some of the region around the is of the order of magnitude found experimentally.
oxygen, this difference in entropies will probably Since the derivation was valid for any ordinary
be considerably less than, possibly one-half of, the temperature, we may take the derivative of the
entropy of solution of OH- ion which is -26 cal./ entropy of ionization with respect to the logarithm
deg. mole.30 In cases where the ion has several of the temperature and obtain the change in heat
equivalent oxygens among which the charge is capacity with ionizetion. The latter quantity
divided, the above description must be suitably should then have about the same magnitude for
amended, although the expected entropy of solution different acids, as is found experimentally.
should be very sin ilar. The entropy of ionization We may now test further the values of the heat
is then the sum of three terms: the absolute en- of ionization of sulfuric acid given in Table 111.
tropy of the hydrogen ion, -4.6, the difference in It is apparent from Table IV that the value of the
the entropies of the gas ion (A-) and the molecule entropy of ionization given there, - 26.3 cal./deg.
(HA), about -4, and the difference in the entro- mole, is about as small as one would expect. The
pies of solution of the gas ion and molecule which fact that the heat of ionization found by Hamer"
will be considerably smaller than -26. If the gives a still smaller value of the entropy, -16.3,
last term is taken as -2612 = -13, we find the argues strongly against that result.
entropy of ionization to be -22, or roughly the Variation of Ionization Constants with Tem-
average of the values for the first ionizations perature.-Using the results of the preceding
listed in Table IV. The weaker acids show larger section, we may now set up approximate expres-
entropies of ionization, as is to be expected due sions which give the ionization constant as a func-
to the greater concentration of negative charge tion of temperature, provided a single value of the
on the oxygen atom. The entropies of second constant is available. Assuming a constant
or third ionizations are larger, because the en- AC,, thermodynamics gives
tropy of solution term depends on the square of A H = AH0 +
ACpT
the charge. A S = ASo +
ACpIn T
AF = RT In K = AH - TAS = AH0 - TASo +
ACp ( T T1n T ) -
If K and thereby AF is known for some tempera-

a O.oOL--] Acetic
acid
/Propionic
ture say TI

I acid
~

If Ti = 298.1, ACp = -40, AS29s.l = -22

,
8
0.00 L
1
&
-- * IButyric
acid
or
+
AF = AF298.1 5425

log K = (const./T)
- 246T + 40T In T
+ 53.78 - 20 log T
(8)

(9)
This expression should be useful for a great many
approximate calculations.
If the data on an ionization constant cover a
-0.05 sufficient range of temperature to determine ac-
-0.10 1 , curately the first derivative (heat of ionization),
0 20 40 60 nevertheless, the knowledge that ACp is probably
t, "C. near -40 cal./deg. should be useful. This gives
Fig. 3.-Test of equations (10) and (11) with glycine, an equation for the form
acetic, propionic, butyric, boric acids and water: open log K = A + B/T - 20 log T (10)
circles, eq. (10); solid circles, eq. (11).
Harned and Embree'O also have discussed the
This discussion gives, of course, only a very ap- variation of ionization constants with tempera-
proximate value for the entropy of ionization, but ture, and have proposed the equation
it does seem to show why this quantity is approxi- log K = log K , - 5.0 x io-yt - e)* (11)
mately the same for various qeak acids and why it in which the constants K , and 0 are the maxi-
(30) The rotational contribution was excluded from the entropy mum value of the ionization constant and the
.of the OH- gas ion since rotation is certainly not present in solution
.and only the "electrostatic" entropy of solution was desired. temperature a t which the maximum is attained.
Nov., 1937 SOMEHEATSOF IONIZATION 2371

The range of validity of the equation is given heats of reaction in aqueous solution is described.
as t - 8 = *75. The authors make no attempt The available data on the heat of ionization of
to interpret this equation theoretically. water are considered, and a revised value for the
It may be noted that both equations (10) and AC, of the reaction obtained. Accurate meas-
(11) have two undetermined constants, and, since urements of the heat of neutralization of hydro-
it is known that both can be fitted satisfactorily chloric acid with sodium hydroxide a t 25’ are
to the experimental data for many acids, it seems described, which give a value of the heat of ioniza-
likely that the fundamental assumptions in equa- tion of water that is in good agreement with the
tion (11) are essentially the same as those of (lo), revised value calculated from previous measure-
i. e., AC* is a constant and has a value of about ments. The selected “best” value of AHo for the
-40 cal./deg. Application of the usual thermo- ionization of water is: 13,358 - 50.0(t - 25) +
dynamic equations to (11) yields 0.15(t - 25)2 cal./mole. The heat of ionization
AC, = -2.3 x +
10-4~7-11- 2(1 - e)] (12) was measured for several weak acids and ammo-
or at T = 298.1 OK. nium hydroxide with the following results
AC, = -40.6 - 0.273(25 - e) Substance
AHQof ionization a t
25‘, 30 cal./mole
Thus for the case in which both 8 and t are near NH4OH 865 * 30
25’ it becomes apparent that equations (10) and H2C03 1843 * 60
(11) are essentially the same, and that the theo- HCOs- 3500 * 100
retical considerations given above are applicable Hap04 -1880 * 80
to equation (11) also. HzPOa- 800 * 80
HPO4-- 3500 * 500
It remains then to consider which of the two HSOI- -5200 * 500
equations is more satisfactory when either t or 8
is considerably different from 25’. Figure 3 The changes in heat, free energy, entropy, and
presents graphically the deviations of the experi- heat capacity with ionization are tabulated for
mental from the calculated values of K , for several sixteen weak acids. It i; discovered that for all
acids, when the constants of each equation are ‘Yirst’)ionizations, AS’ is near -22 cal./mole and
evaluated from the data at 10 and 40’. The data ACp near -40 cal./mole, and an explanation of
for other acids which to save space were omitted this fact is offered. Use is also made of these
from Fig. 3, give results similar to those shown, generalizations to develop the following formula
the greater number being similar to glycine. It which gives approximately the ionization constant
is thus apparent that equation (10) gives better over a range of temperature, provided a single
agreement in virtually every instance where there experimental value is known: log K = const./T
is an appreciable difference between the two equa- + 53.78 - 20 log T. When a series of values of
tions. an ionization constant are available, an equation
The writer wishes to acknowledge with thanks
of the form: log K = A + B/T +20 log T is
the many valuable suggestions made by Professor suggested. It is also pointed out that within its
limited range of applicability the equation recently
W. M. Latimer.
suggested by Harned and Embree is essentially
summary equivalent to the second one given above,
A calorimeter for the precise measurements of CALIF.
BERKELEY, RECEIVED
JULY 12,1937

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen