Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
the exponential E ( )
It is often used for electronic components (failures are "rare events") and can be used to model
items during their useful working life (the ‡at section of the bathtub curve). We easily obtain
and
f (t) = R0 (t)
t
= e (2.3)
1
Ex. Verify that
1
Mean
ln 2 :693
Median =
1
Variance 2
R (t0 + t)
R (tjt0 ) =
R (t0 )
exp f (t0 + t)g
=
exp f t0 g
t
=e
Thus R (tjt0 ) = R (t) so a component age t0 has the same reliability characteristics as a new
component. (Called the non-aging or memoryles property.) In particular, future life expectancy
1
is constant at : These properties follow from the previous section considering that E ( ) is both
IFR and DFR.
2
2.1.2 Poisson shock model
Suppose a device is subject to a stream of shocks arriving in a Poisson process with rate per unit
time.
( t)n t
Pr fn shocks in time tg = e (2.4)
n!
n = 0; 1; 2; :::
NB.
2. The rate is entirely dependent on the time scale (seconds, minutes etc.) So is known as
the scale parameter and k the shape parameter.
Recall that:
1. The sum of k independent exponential random variables with parameter has the gamma
distribution (k; ) : In this case (k integer) it is also called the Erlang distribution.
(i) When z = k; integer, (k) = (k 1)! the factorial function. Otherwise we have to refer
to tables of the gamma function.
(ii) The gamma integral satis…es the recursion (z + 1) = k (k).
3
3. The p.d.f. of (k; ) is
( t)k 1
t
f (t) = e t>0 for k > 0
(k)
(2.7)
k 1
( t) t
= e t>0 for integer k ( 1)
(k 1)!
Consider a …xed time interval (0; t) and a device new at time 0. From the Poisson process (2.4)
Therefore
Notice that Sk t
1 (t) is the partial sum to k terms of the exponential series expansion of e and
satis…es the recursion :
d
Sk = Sk0 = Sk 1 (2.9)
dt
for k > 1:
The lifetime density f (t) can be obtained from R (t) using (2:8) and (2:9)
f (t) = R0 (t)
d t
= [e Sk 1 (t)]
dt
t t
= [e ( Sk 2) + e Sk 1]
t
= e [Sk 1 Sk 2]
( t)k 1 t
= e (2.10)
(k 1)!
4
The hazard function is
f (t)
h (t) =
R (t)
( t)k 1
= (2.11)
(k 1)!Sk 1 (t)
1
Now [h (t)] is a polynomial in t consisting of entirely negative powers t0 ; t 1 ; :::; t (k 1) .
1
So [h (t)] is a decreasing function of t, i.e. h (t) is an increasing function of t: Hence
Result
The gamma failure time distribution is IFR for integer k:
where > 0 is a scale parameter and > 0 is a dimensionless shape parameter. Notice that
1 1
has dimensions and some books use instead = , known as characteristic life, as the scale
Time
parameter. The lifetime density (p.d.f.) is
f (t) = R0 (t)
h i
1
= ( t) exp ( t) (2.13)
leading to
f (t)
h (t) =
R (t)
1
= ( t) (2.14)
a simple power of t: This property characterizes the Weibull distribution. As a check, we see that
(2.12) has the form
R (t) = exp [ H (t)]
5
Rt
where H (t) = 0 h (u) du and (2.14) is substituted for h (t) :
Since h (t) _ t 1 which is a positive power of t for > 1; therefore W ( ; ) is IFR for > 1.
Similarly for < 1; W ( ; ) is DFR and for = 1 the distribution is CFR.
1 1
= 1+ (2.15a)
1 1
= (2.15b)
R1
where (z) = 0 uz 1 e u du is the gamma function previously de…ned.
Proof
6
Figure 1: Weibull hazard functions
Z 1
= R (t) dt
Z0 1 h i
= exp ( t) dt
0
u = ( t)
1
t=u
1
1
dt = 1 u
http://www.efunda.com/math/gamma/…ndgamma.cfm
Example
7
Consider a device with lifetime distributed as W ( ; ) where = 31 ; = 1
16;000 in hours 1: Find
the MTTF and the median life tm : Which is the better measure of "typical life"?
Solution
i) The MTTF is
1 1
= 1+
R (tm ) = 0:5
h i
exp ( tm ) = 0:5
( tm ) = ln 2
1 1
tm = (ln 2)
Note: The median life is a better measure than the mean life since the p.d.f. is highly skewed.
Since < 1 the distribution is DFR - suitable for modelling initial "infant mortality" portion of
bathtub curve.
h i
R (t) = exp ( t)
1
R = exp [ 1] = 0:368
=1 0:632
2. A series system of k identical Weibull distributed components also has the Weibull distribu-
tion of failure with the same shape parameter but a di¤erent scale parameter.
Let T1 ; T2 ; :::; Tk be the individual times to failure.
8
Let Y be the system failure time.
RS (t) = Pr (Y > t)
= Pr (T1 > t \ T2 > t \ ::: \ Tk > t)
k
Y
= Ri (t)
i=1
1
Hence system time to failure Y s W ;k .
This is known as the self-reproducing property of the Weibull distribution.
A pure series system fails if and only if any component fails. Assume (usually) that Ti are inde-
pendent random variables. Then
k
Y
RS (t) = Ri (t) (2.17)
i=1
as obtained previously. Notice that if Rmin (t) = mini fRi (t)g then RS (t) Rmin (t) : A series
system is less reliable than the weakest link!
When components are identical Ri (t) = R (t) each i then
RS (t) = [R (t)]k
9
The hazard function of a series system is additive
k
X
hS (t) = hi (t) (2.18)
i=1
Proof
fS (t) d
hS (t) = = ln RS (t)
RS (t) dt
k
X d
= ln Ri (t)
dt
i=1
Xk
= hi (t)
i=1
This result explains why the Weibull (and in particular the exponential) failure time distribution
has the self-reproducing property: when hi (t) are a simple power of t, the sum hS (t) will be also
be a multiple of that power of t:
k
Y
1 RP (t) = (1 Ri (t))
i=1
k
Y
RP (t) = 1 (1 Ri (t)) (2.19)
i=1
In particular letting Rmax (t) = maxi fRi (t)g we have RP (t) Rmax (t) : Thus a parallel system
improves on the reliability of the most reliable component (common sense result).
Such systems have n identical components of which k is the minimum number of working compo-
nents for the system to function. The system reliability is given by
n
X
RS (t) = Pr (exactly r working components)
r=k
Xn
n
= R (t)r (1 R (t))n r
(2.20)
r
r=k
Assuming independent failures, the number of working components at time t has the binomial
distribution Bin (n; p) with p = R (t) :
10
Ex. Show that setting k = n and k = 1 respectively in (2.20) results in expressions (2.17) (2.19)
for the system reliability of a pure series and a pure parallel system.
2.4.4 Examples
1
S =
1+ 2
1 1 1
P = +
1 2 1+ 2
2. Two identical components with CFR are joined in parallel operation. What should the
component failure rate be to achieve a system reliability RP (1000) = 0:95? [Ans.:000253].
Show that the corresponding system MTTF is 5927 hours, a 50% improvement on MTTF for
a single component.
3. Find the reliability at 1000 hours of a 2-out of-3 system comprising two components each
with constant failure rate =3 10 5:
[Ans. .9974]
Q1.
T1 E( 1) T2 E( 2)
Z t
Rs (t) = exp h (u) du
0
( 1 + 2 )t
=e
Z 1
1
s = Rs (t) dt =
0 1 + 2
11
(b) Parallel system
Z 1
1 1 1
p = Rp (t) dt = +
0 1 2 1+ 2
Q2.
Set 1 = 2 = in the formula for Rp (t) obtained in Q1.
t 2 t
Rp (t) = 2e e
= 2x x2
2x x2 = :95
p
=) x=1 :05
Hence = 0:000253:
2 1 3
M T T Fp = =
2 2
(= 5928 hours) which compared to
1
= MTTF =
Q3.
A 2 out of 3 system with
t :03
R (t) = e =e
RS (t) = 3
3 R (t)3 + 3
2 R (t)2 [1 R (t)]
= :9974
12