Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Features
SEND A
LETTER
TO THE
EDITOR
Dmitri Tymoczko wrote the first article on music theory ever to be published in the
prestigious journal “Science.”
Peter Murphy
A few years ago, Princeton University music theorist and composer Dmitri Tymoczko
was sitting in the living room of his home playing with a piece of paper. Printed on the
sheet were rows and columns of dots representing all the two-note chords that can be
played on a piano — AA, AB b , AB, and so on for the rows; AA, B b A, BA, and so on for
the columns. It was a simple drawing, something a child could make, yet Tymoczko felt
that the piece of paper was trying to show him something that no one ever had seen
before.
Tymoczko had discovered the fundamental geometric shape of two-note chords. They
occupy the space of a Möbius strip, a two-dimensional surface embedded in a three-
dimensional space. Music is not just something that can be heard, he realized. It has a
shape.
He soon saw that he could transform more complex chords the same way. Three-note
chords occupy a twisted three-dimensional space, and four-note chords live in a
corresponding but impossible-to-visualize four-dimensional space. In fact, it worked
for any number of notes — each chord inhabit ed a multidimensional space that twisted
back on itself in unusual ways — a non-Euclidean space that does not adhere to the
classical rules of geometry. A physicist friend told him that these odd multidimensional
spaces were called orbifolds — a name chosen by the graduate students of Princeton
mathematician William Thurston, who first described them in the 1970s. In the 1980s,
physicists found a few applications for orbifolds in arcane areas of string theory. Now
Tymoczko had discovered that music exists in a universe of orbifolds.
The link between geometry and music has deep roots. Sometime between 530 and 500
B.C., in the town of Kroton on the rocky southern coast of Italy, Pythagoras and his
followers made one of the most consequential discoveries in the history of science. If
the string of a harp is shortened by half, it creates a tone one octave above that of the
unshortened string. If the original string is shortened by two-thirds, the resulting tone
is separated from the octave tone by a euphonious interval we know today as a fifth.
Further experimentation showed that dividing the string into four parts produces
intervals now known as fourths, with fur ther divisions of the string producing the
familiar 12-note chromatic scale that the Greeks bequeathed to history.
Pythagoras and his followers thought big. The rational division of the musical scale was
not just beautiful or pleasing — it was a sign that the universe was constructed on a
rational basis and could be understood. “It was the first consistent realization that there
is a mathematical rationality in the universe and that the human mind can make sense
of that rationality,” says Kitty Ferguson, the author of The Music of Pythagoras: How an
Ancient Brotherhood Cracked the Code of the Universe and Lit the Path from
Antiquity to Outer Space.
Two-and-a-half millennia later, fifths and fourths are still the basis not just of three-
chord rock-and-roll, but of much basic music theory. Students learn how to recognize
intervals and relate those intervals to different kinds of scales, like major and minor
scales. They practice transposing, inverting, and modulating melodies and chords.
They absorb, perhaps without fully realizing it, the mathematician Gottfried Leibniz’s
injunction that music is the “unknowing exercise of our mathematical faculties.”
Tymoczko falls squarely into the mathematical tradition in music. His father, Thomas,
was a well-known philosopher of mathematics at Smith College who was fascinated by
the use of computers in mathematics. His sister, Julianna, is a mathematician
specializing in algebraic geometry at the University of Iowa.
But Tymoczko, growing up in the 1980s in Northhampton, Mass., spent more time
listening to the Talking Heads, John Coltrane, and Brian Eno than solving equations.
He swapped his piano lessons for guitar lessons and began playing in bands. He
entered Harvard intending to study music, but the abstract and atonal music his
professors preferred left him cold, and he switched from composition to philosophy.
After studying philosophy at Oxford on a Rhodes scholarship, he kicked around
Harvard for a few years as a teaching assistant, composing on the side and dabbling in
journalism. Finally he decided to become serious about music again and enrolled in
music graduate school at the University of California, Berkeley.
Möbius strip representation of two-note chords: The black lines in the illustration
above outline the rows and columns of Tymoczko’s original diagram, in which all
the two-note chords that can be played on a piano were arranged vertically and
horizontally. To see what he found, copy this page and cut out the diagram. Twist it,
and attach the 1s to each other and the 2s to each other. The chords match up in the
resulting Möbius strip.
This figure shows how geometrical music theory represents four-note chords as a
portion of an orbifold — the collections of notes form a tetrahedron, with the colors
indicating the spacing between the individual notes in a sequence. In the blue
spheres, the notes are clustered; in the warmer colors, they are farther apart. The
red ball at the top of the pyramid is the diminished seventh chord. Near it are all the
most familiar chords of Western music.
Tymoczko got interested in the mathematics of music for what he calls a “selfish
reason” — he wanted his music to sound better. His music is distinctly modern but also
“tonal” — a term that he defines in his new book as music that adheres to several basic
principles. In compositions such as “Four Dreams” and “The Agony of Modern Music”
(termed “brilliant” by music critic Alex Ross), he combines the free-flowing vibe of
jazz, the strangeness of 20th-century music, and the raw exuberance of the rock ‘n’ roll
he listened to growing up. Combining such different kinds of music is a delicate
balancing act, and to do it well, Tymoczko decided that he needed to understand music
at a more fundamental level.
Early on, Tymoczko recognized that tonal music has two major distinguishing features.
First, melodies tend to move short distances from note to note — a characteristic
known in music theory as “efficient voice leading.” Think of the tunes you can hum off
the top of your head. They probably have notes that are fairly close to each other, rather
than strings of notes that jump wildly up and down. Melodies with close-together notes
are easier to sing and to play on most instruments, and they’re easier to listen to.
A second important feature of tonal music is that it uses harmonies that sound good
rather than bad. For reasons that aren’t entirely clear, humans (including infants) tend
to prefer certain kinds of chords to other kinds of chords. Echoing the findings of
Pythagoras, we tend to like chords that divide the octave almost, but not completely,
evenly. Triads, seventh chords, ninths, elevenths — the archetypal chords of everything
from early polyphony to jazz — divide the octave into ever-smaller but approximately
equal-sized segments, much as the vertical lines on a ruler divide feet and inches into
equal-sized intervals. In contrast, notes that are next to each other sound harsh and
dissonant when played together, like a child banging his fists on a piano.
These two properties may seem to be unrelated. But the “amazing and mysterious”
thing about music, Tymoczko says, is that each requires the other. Three singers can go
from a pleasing C-major chord to the complementary and more plaintive A-minor
chord by moving just one note: changing from CEG to CEA. Someone playing “Hey
Jude” on the piano can move his or her fingers very little while moving from one
sonorous chord to another. “Miraculously, the chords that sound good together and the
ones that produce efficient voice leading are the same,” Tymoczko says.
Tymoczko and other music theorists knew that these obser vations must have a
mathematical representation, and previ ous theorists had captured some of these
properties using geo metric ideas. He developed an intense e-mail relationship with
Quinn, Callender, and several other theorists who were working on the same general
problem: How can music be captured mathematically in the most powerful possible
way? “People had been coming up with ad hoc solutions,” says Yale’s Quinn. “We
wanted to do something general.”
Callender, Quinn, and Tymoczko all knew that the unusual properties of the space
meant that it somehow harbored additional, non-Euclidean dimensions. But how were
those dimensions configured? This is where Tymoczko’s checkered academic history
came in. From his time at Harvard and Berkeley, he had lots of mathematician and
physicist friends. One suggested making a physical representation of the space and
playing with it. That’s the piece of paper he printed out, stared at in his living room, and
used to discover the Möbius strip representation of two-note chords. Tymoczko’s
scientist friends also told him that when they make a big discovery they submit the
work to Science. A 2006 paper by Tymoczko and a 2008 paper by all three
collaborators became the first on music theory in Science’s 129-year history.
The implications for composers are momentous, says Tymoczko. “Imagine that you’re
a blind man in a city who knows how to get from your home and to a coffee shop.
Suddenly your vision is restored. You realize that not only are the post office and coffee
shop very close to each other, but that you can get there many other ways, and many of
them are better than the way you knew.”
The geometric representation of music also provides a powerful way to analyze past
compositions. In his new book, Tymoczko uses geometric concepts to “retell the
history of Western music.” For example, on the Möbius strip representation of two-
note chords, medieval composers of two-voice polyphony tended to remain near the
center of the space, with occasional leaps to its edge whenever the two singers were to
voice the same note. By the high classical period of Bach, Mozart, and Beethoven,
composers had become experts at crafting harmonious pieces that fully exploited these
central regions of musical orbifolds. Later composers then began to branch out,
exploring new regions of musical space. By the 20th century, minimalist composers like
Steve Reich were relying on burbling arpeggios of closely spaced notes right on the
edges of orbifolds, while jazz composers like Miles Davis and Bill Evans were further
exploring the chromatic spaces between the centers and edges of orbifolds pioneered
by Wagner and Debussy.
This way of visualizing music provides new insights into how composers wrote some of
the world’s most beautiful music. In his living room, Tymoczko plays Chopin’s
“Prelude in E” through the speakers of his laptop as the computer mon itor displays a
three-dimensional projection of a four-dimensional orbifold. With each new chord, a
ball moves through a latticework of points on the screen. Repeatedly the prelude
returns to a particular point in the lattice — representing a diminished seventh chord —
from which it branches first to a chord on the immediate right and then to a chord on
the immediate left. But at other points in the prelude, the ball moves freely along the
lattice, a kind of improvisation more commonly associated with modern music.
“Composers in the 19th century had an intuitive understanding of the bizarre geometry
of musical chord space,” Tymoczko says. “In fact, they had a better feel for non-
Euclidean, higher-dimensional spaces than did their mathematical contemporaries.”
Tymoczko’s approach also makes it possible to compare very different kinds of music.
At various times in his new book he compares Schumann’s “Chopin” movement in
Carna val to Nirvana’s “Heart-Shaped Box,” Shostakovich’s “G-Minor Piano Quintet”
to the Black Sabbath song “Sabbath, Bloody Sabbath,” and Philip Glass’ opera Einstein
on the Beach to the opening of the TV show Battlestar Galactica. “Music that
superficially seems quite different, like Renaissance music and jazz, make remarkably
similar use of musical space,” he says.
In fact, Tymoczko argues, the music of the past millennium in the West, and much of
non-Western music as well, constitutes an “extended common practice” characterized
by the continued broadening of usable musical space. That history has, of course, been
shaped by the creativity and idiosyncrasies of individual composers. But it has followed
certain broad paths because of how musical orbifolds are configured. It’s like a
mountaineer ascending a rock face, he says. In principle, the climber is free to move in
any direction. But the structure of the rock provides certain natural routes, offering
handholds and footholds along the way. “The trick for the historian is to make room for
historical contingency while also capturing the way in which music history sometimes
follows the path of least resistance, like a climber ascending a cliff by way of a
particularly inviting chute.”
Tymoczko’s work falls into the category of basic research — it doesn’t have a
guaranteed payoff. Yet already it’s finding lots of applications. Among the first
enthusiasts were composers who use computers to produce musical ideas — and in
some cases, complete compositions. Composer Michael Gogins, for example, uses
orbifolds to add harmonic and melodic structure to notes generated randomly by the
computer. “It gives you more power,” he says.
Some music theorists have begun using orbifolds to teach composition and theory to
undergraduates, a trend Tymoczko hopes his new book will encourage. The value of
the idea, says Quinn at Yale, is that a geometric approach demonstrates both the
possibilities and constraints of music. “Once composers said, ‘Let’s get out of the box,’
that’s when they began wrapping themselves around the singularities and other weird
parts of the space.”
The saxophone genius Charlie Parker put it a bit differently: Learn all the theory you
can, he said, and then forget it when you play.
Steve Olson, based in Seattle, has written about genetics, race, evolution, climate
change, talent, and punk-rock music, among other things. His most recent book,
Anarchy Evolution: Faith, Science, and Bad Religion in a World Without God, co-
written by Greg Graffin, was published in September by itbooks.
Comment Archives
Sort by Newest
' Recommend ⤤ Share
LOG IN WITH
OR SIGN UP WITH DISQUS ?
Name
Michael Gogins
− ⚑
a year ago
I don't randomly generate the notes... I use deterministic systems to generate the notes. But using
chord spaces and symmetries does very definitely make it easier to make pieces.
△ ▽ Reply
Headliners: The 2017 Princeton Alumni in Voices: The Zoo Wants You
the News Quiz 1 comment • 2 months ago
1 comment • a month ago Caroline Coleman — Caroline Coleman '86:
candide — Norman Ravitch *59 *62: As a “Miraculously, Anastasia produced a power
parent fears public news about his/her child drill.” Fun story. Well told. But why didn’t …
might be embarrassing or worse, so too …
FEATURES
FEATURED AUTHORS
The history teacher
Oppenheimer '61's poetry Gary Nash ’55 *64 works at a university, but
focuses on NYC around 9/11 his heart is in the schoolhouse
Web Exclusives
ON THE CAMPUS
Jan. 16, 2018: Yi *09 on Building a Start-Up in China; Wald ’04 on the
Iran Protests; and More
FEATURED AUTHORS
Inside The
Current Issue
Our most influential alumni, slices of life from the math department
in the 1930s, and more
Featured Content
Our Most Influential Alumni Adventures in Fine Hall PAW Goes to the Movies:
Professor Kevin Kruse Reviews
‘The Post’
Beginning the Princeton Journey: Nick Marsh ’90 and Nancy Together Again: Simone Schloss
A Peculiar Sort of Home Easton ’88 Work Together To ’79
Promote Health, Fitness in
Schools
Browse Inbox
Read more letters from PAW readers and join the conversation by posting comments.
Princetonians
Newsletter Sign-Up
Sign Up Now
Contact Us
Alumni Association
Princeton.edu