Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Ministry
Level
Below
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Beyond
Expectations
One
Two
Three
Four
Five
Marking
Scheme
0/1
(Inadequate/Poor)
2.5
(Adequate/Marginal)
3.5
(Good)
4.5
(Very
Good)
5
(Excellent/Outstanding)
Information
Content
o Did
not
submit
o Adequate
use
of
the
o Information
was
o Information
o Information
beyond
level
4
in
1. Textual
content
is
product.
language
and
appropriate
complete
and
complete,
completeness
and
accuracy.
complete,
and
well‐ o Blank
or
off‐topic
vocabulary
utilized.
accurate.
accurate,
and
well
o Information
fully
cited
and
summarized.
brochure.
o Some
information
was
not
o Information
was
summarized.
several
sources
were
used.
2. Topic
clarity
evident.
o Some
information
cited
or
only
one
source
cited
and
more
o All
information
o Command
of
language,
3. Superior
command
inaccurate.
used.
than
one
source
cited
and
more
vocabulary,
and
terminology
of
the
language.
o Terminology
and
o Target
audience
not
clear.
was
used.
than
one
source
superior.
4. Information
was
vocabulary
lacking
or
o Good
use
of
was
used.
o Brochure
was
clearly
created
cited.
confused.
vocabulary
and
o Proper
and
for
a
specific
audience.
o No
information
was
terminology.
effective
use
of
cited.
o The
target
language,
o Target
audience
not
audience
can
vocabulary,
and
clear.
possibly
be
terminology.
identified
after
o Brochure
was
looking
at
the
clearly
created
for
brochure.
a
specific
audience.
Information
o Layout
lacked
o Acceptable
layout
of
o Layout
logical,
o Layout
self‐ o Presentation
beyond
level
4
Presentation
organization,
was
presentation.
concise,
and
explanatory.
in
organization
and
1. Images
add
value
to
difficult
to
understand,
o The
placement
of
images
could
be
o Layout
was
attractiveness.
the
brochure.
and
unappealing.
can
be
improved.
followed
easily.
visually
appealing.
o Images
were
successfully
2. The
content
and
o Images
did
not
make
o Layout
was
o Images
were
used
in
placement
and
utility.
images
were
well
sense
with
topic.
visually
integrated
and
organized.
appealing
and
well
placed.
images
were
on‐
topic.
Based on evaluation scheme found in Creating Integrated Curriculum (1998) by Susan Drake
Evaluation
Rubric
Writing
Mechanics:
o Many
major
grammar
o Few
major
grammar
or
o Few
minor
o A
couple
of
minor
o No
grammar
or
spelling
Grammar
and
Spelling
or
spelling
errors.
spelling
errors.
grammar
or
grammar
or
errors
evident.
selling
errors.
spelling
errors
evident.
Teamwork
o
Did
not
contribute
to
o
Did
not
follow‐through
o Followed‐ o Followed‐through
o Works
excellently
with
team
1. Clear
evidence
of
the
brochure.
fully
with
assigned
duties.
through
and
and
fully
members.
contribution.
o
Was
not
cooperative
o Contributed
a
small
contributed
to
contributed
with
o Went
above
and
beyond
2. Cooperates
well
with
and/or
started
conflicts
amount
to
the
group.
the
group
by
assigned
tasks.
assigned
tasks.
others.
within
the
group.
completing
o Works
excellently
o Delegated
tasks
and/or
assigned
tasks.
with
team
assisted
team
members.
o Works
members.
o Was
able
to
address
and
excellently
with
o Assisted
team
solve
group
problems.
team
members.
members.
Comments/Observations/Conference
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Student
Signature
______________________________________________________
Teacher
Signature
_____________________________________________
Based on evaluation scheme found in Creating Integrated Curriculum (1998) by Susan Drake