Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Lecture # 13
Output Feedback Stabilization
z
φ(·) ✛ ✛
s
τ s+1
+ u y ẏ
✲ ❥ ✲ Plant ✲ s ✲
−✻
z
φ(·) ✛ 1
τ s+1
✛
Note that
τi żi = −zi + ẏi
is
V = 12 ėT M(q)ė + 21 eT Kp e
u = g(q) − Kp (q − qr ) − Kd z
Kd is positive diagonal matrix. Compare with state feedback
u = g(q) − Kp (q − qr ) − Kd q̇
Observer:
x̂˙ = f (x̂, u) + H[y − h(x̂)]
x̃ = x − x̂
def
x̃˙ = f (x, u) − f (x̂, u) − H[h(x) − h(x̂)] = g(x, x̃)
g(x, 0) = 0
u = γ(x̂)
Closed-loop system:
ẋ = f (x, γ(x − x̃)), x̃˙ = g(x, x̃) (⋆)
High-gain observer
x̂˙ 1 = x̂2 + (α1 /ε)(y − x̂1 ), x̂˙ 2 = φ0 (x̂, u) + (α2 /ε2 )(y − x̂1 )
OFB ε = 0.01
x
−1
−1.5
OFB ε = 0.005
−2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
−1
2
x
−2
−3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
−100
u
−200
−300
−400
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1
t
0.2
0
x1
−0.2
−0.4
−0.6
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08
−200
x2
−400
−600
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08
2000
1000
u
−1000
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08
t
Saturate u at ±1
SFB
0.15
OFB ε = 0.1
0.1 OFB ε = 0.01
OFB ε = 0.001
x1
0.05
−0.05
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.05
0
x2
−0.05
−0.1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0
u
−0.5
−1
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1
t
1
x2
−1
−2
−3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3
x1
0.5
x2
−0.5
−1
−2 −1 0 1 2
x1
η ✻
O(1/ε)
q q
❉ ❉
❉ ❉
❉ ❉
❉ ❉
❉ ❉
❉ ❉
O(ε) ❉ ❉
❲ ❲
✲
✛ Ωb ✲ x
✛ Ωc ✲
∂V
f0 (η, y) ≤ −α3 (kηk), ∀ kηk ≥ α4 (|y|)
∂η
Sliding Mode Control: Sliding surface y = 0
u = ψ(y) + v
0 ≤ κ0 < 1
̺(y)
β(y) ≥ + β0
1 − κ0
y
v = −β(y) sat
µ
y
u = ψ(y) − β(y) sat
µ
All the assumptions hold in a domain D
z = col η, ξ1 , . . . ξρ−2 , ξρ−1
Zero Dynamics (s = 0):
ż = f¯0 (z, 0)
is Hurwitz
α1 (kzk) ≤ V (z) ≤ α2 (kzk)
∂V ¯
f0 (z, s) ≤ −α3 (kzk), ∀ kzk ≥ α4 (|s|)
∂η
We have converted the relative degree ρ system into a relative
degree one system that satisfies the earlier assumptions
u = ψ(ξ) + v
̺(ξ)
β(ξ) ≥ + β0 ,
β0 > 0
1 − κ0
s
u = ψ(ξ) − β(ξ) sat
µ
Saturate β and ψ