Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Broadcast TV news neglected many critical climate change stories in 2017 while
devoting most of its climate coverage to President Donald Trump. Seventy-nine
percent of climate change coverage on the major corporate broadcast TV networks
last year focused on statements or actions by the Trump administration, with heavy
attention given to the president's decision to withdraw from the Paris agreement
and to whether he accepts that human-caused climate change is a scientific reality.
But the networks undercovered or ignored the ways that climate change had real-
life impacts on people, the economy, national security, and the year’s extreme
weather events -- a major oversight in a year when weather disasters killed
hundreds of Americans, displaced hundreds of thousands more, and cost the
economy in excess of $300 billion.
For this study, Media Matters examined 2017 coverage of climate change on
broadcast TV networks, which included segments devoted to climate change and
segments in which a media figure made substantial mention of climate change. We
analyzed coverage on ABC's, CBS', and NBC's nightly news programs and Sunday
morning political shows. We also analyzed FOX Broadcasting Co.’s syndicated
Sunday morning political show, Fox News Sunday. FOX Broadcasting Co. does not
have a nightly news program, so, overall, there was far less FOX airtime to
analyze. In addition to the corporate broadcast networks, we examined weekday
coverage on PBS's nightly news program, PBS NewsHour. PBS does not have a
Sunday morning political show.
Key findings:
President Donald Trump's decision to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris
climate agreement dominated coverage of climate-related policies and news
events, being featured in 52 percent of all climate segments on the corporate
broadcast networks. The Trump administration's rollbacks of other climate
protections like the Clean Power Plan received far less coverage.
Despite 2017 being a record year for weather and climate disasters, the
corporate broadcast networks rarely covered the link between climate change
and extreme weather events in the U.S. They aired only four total
segments that discussed climate change in the context of disasters that
happened last year, including just two that mentioned climate change in the
context of hurricanes Harvey, Irma, or Maria.
CBS and PBS led all broadcast networks in the number of segments they
devoted to climate change in 2017, as well as in coverage of climate-related
scientific research and number of climate scientists interviewed or quoted.
But CBS and PBS were also the only two networks to feature guests
who flatly denied that human activity causes climate change.
Virtually all of the Sunday show climate coverage revolved around the
Trump administration. The Sunday shows aired a combined 95 minutes of
climate coverage this year, 94 of which featured actions or statements by the
Trump administration -- most often Trump’s decision on whether to remain in the
Paris climate agreement.
Looking at the number of segments, and including PBS NewsHour, we found that
still about two-thirds were focused on Trump. Out of 163 climate segments on the
nightly news shows, 65 percent, or 106 segments, featured Trump administration
actions or statements. On every network, a majority of coverage was related to the
Trump administration, with ABC’s World News Tonight having the highest
percentage of Trump-related climate coverage (78 percent), followed by CBS
Evening News (71 percent), PBS NewsHour (61 percent), and NBC Nightly
News (56 percent).
Nearly half of all climate segments in 2017 were about Trump’s decision on
the Paris climate agreement. The broadcast networks devoted significant
coverage to the run-up to and aftermath of Trump’s decision to withdraw the U.S.
from the Paris climate agreement. On June 1, Trump formally made the
announcement, at the time making the U.S. one of only three countries in the world
not intending to participate in the Paris accord (the other two have since signed
on). Out of the 188 total climate segments the broadcast networks aired in 2017,
45 percent, or 85 segments, featured discussion of the Paris agreement. [Business
Insider, 6/1/17; The New York Times, 11/7/17]
Trump administration’s moves to roll back the Clean Power Plan and other
climate-related regulations received relatively little coverage. In March,
Trump signed an executive order to begin the process of rolling back Obama-era
regulations aimed at fighting climate change, including the Clean Power Plan, which
established the first-ever federal limits on carbon emissions from coal-fired power
plants and served as the linchpin of President Barack Obama’s program to meet the
obligations of the Paris agreement. In October, Scott Pruitt, administrator of
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), advanced the process by proposing to
officially repeal the Clean Power Plan. But though the rollbacks of the Clean Power
Plan and other climate protections will have real effects on Americans and the
quality of the air they breathe, the networks gave them relatively little attention.
They aired just 26 segments on rollbacks of climate protections and 16 segments
on the Clean Power Plan specifically. [Media Matters, 3/30/17; The
Guardian, 2/9/16; The Washington Post, 10/9/17]
Networks generally failed to connect the dots between climate change and
2017’s record-setting natural disasters
2017 was a record year for weather and climate disasters, yet corporate
broadcast networks provided scant discussion of climate change in their
coverage of extreme weather events. 2017 was the costliest disaster year in
the U.S. history. Weather and climate disasters in the country cost $306 billion in
total damages, and 16 extreme weather events each cost more than $1 billion in
damages. Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria were particularly destructive. Maria
alone displaced hundreds of thousands of people and may have led to more than
1,000 deaths.
Yet the corporate broadcast networks -- ABC, CBS, NBC, and FOX -- aired just four
total segments that discussed climate change in the context of the hurricanes or
other 2017 weather disasters. PBS, by contrast, aired eight such segments. The
networks aired three more segments that covered the links between climate change
and extreme weather events outside the U.S. [The Washington
Post, 1/8/18, 12/13/17, 12/6/17; CBS News, 12/5/17; The New York
Times, 12/18/17; Media Matters, 9/14/17, 7/5/17; InsideClimate
News, 7/11/17; Climate.gov, 5/1/17; USA Today, 5/12/17]
● 2017’s major hurricanes, Harvey, Irma, and Maria, were covered in seven
segments that mentioned climate change on PBS (5), CBS (1), and NBC (1).
ABC and FOX did not bring up climate change during any segments on the
hurricanes.
● The June heat wave that affected large swaths of the Southwest was covered
in two segments that mentioned climate change, one on PBS and one on
CBS.
● The July wildfires in the Western U.S. were covered in one segment on CBS
that mentioned climate change.
The networks aired an additional 19 segments that mentioned that climate change
exacerbates extreme weather, but these segments only discussed the connection in
general terms and did not refer to a specific 2017 weather event.
A recent report found that U.S. media outlets consistently failed last year
to explain how extreme weather is connected to climate change. The
nonprofit watchdog group Public Citizen recently released a report that analyzed
coverage on U.S. TV and radio programs and in newspapers, which found that the
vast majority of stories on weather disasters did not mention climate change. In the
most extreme example, 96 percent of stories about 2017’s historic hurricane
season did not note the role that climate change plays in intensifying hurricanes.
[Public Citizen, 1/5/18; Media Matters, 1/10/18]
Even though the impact of climate change on extreme weather events received too
little coverage, other important impacts of climate change got even less attention.
The second most covered impact was abnormal weather trends, such as increased
global temperatures and melting glaciers. Overall, the many ways that climate
change affects human society and the natural world were severely undercovered in
2017.
PBS led the networks in coverage of abnormal weather trends. PBS provided
the most coverage of climate-related abnormal weather trends, airing 12 such
segments, followed by CBS and NBC (eight segments each), and ABC (three
segments). FOX did not air any segments on abnormal weather trends linked to
climate change. Examples of abnormal weather reporting include a PBS
NewsHour segment that discussed how rising temperatures and melting sea ice in
the Arctic are heightening the danger of floods and storms for Alaskan native
communities, an NBC segment about how climate change is causing significant loss
of glaciers in Glacier National Park, and a CBS segment that discussed Arctic sea ice
“shrinking at a rate never seen before.” [PBS NewsHour, 8/2/17; NBC Nightly
News, 11/12/17; CBS Evening News, 4/22/17]
PBS and CBS led the networks in coverage of sea-level rise, while ABC and
FOX ignored it. A number of studies published in 2017 found that sea-level rise is
proceeding faster, and may be more severe, than previous research indicated. PBS
and CBS aired the most segments on rising sea levels: seven each. NBC aired three
segments, while ABC and FOX both neglected to address the topic in their climate
coverage. [E&E News, 12/29/17]
CBS and NBC rarely covered economic impacts of climate change, while
ABC and FOX ignored the topic. CBS aired only two segments on the ways
climate change affects the economy, while NBC aired just one segment and ABC
and FOX both aired none. PBS NewsHour covered climate change’s economic
impacts in five segments, including one on May 31 in which climate scientist
Michael Oppenheimer explained that the costs associated with EPA greenhouse gas
regulations are “less than the cost of the damages that climate change will bring.”
PBS also aired a March 29 segment reporting that “rising sea levels, accelerated by
global warming, mean forests of mangroves [in the Florida Everglades] are moving
far inland, killing off the natural habitat” -- part of degradation of the Everglades
that puts billions of dollars' worth of economic activity at risk. [PBS
NewsHour, 5/31/17, 3/29/17]
For example, in a June 4 segment on CBS' Face the Nation, host John Dickerson
and U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley had the following exchange:
HALEY: The president believes the climate is changing, and he does know
that pollutants are a part of that equation.
HALEY: I mean, John -- John, I just gave you the answer. I mean that's -
- that's what he believes. And so that's as clear as I know to give it.
Similarly, Scott Pruitt avoided giving host George Stephanopoulos a clear answer
about whether Trump continued to believe climate change is a hoax on the June 4
episode of ABC’s This Week. Despite Stephanopoulos pressing for clarity on the
issue, Pruitt merely said that Trump believes “the climate changes” and that his
conversations with the president focused on “the merits and the demerits of the
Paris agreement” rather than on Trump's beliefs regarding climate change. [The
New York Times, 11/23/16; Media Matters, 5/26/16; Union of Concerned
Scientists, accessed 2/8/18; CBS’ Face the Nation, 6/4/17; ABC’s This Week,
6/4/17]
Trump officials adopted new tack of “lukewarm” climate denial, and most
networks failed to accurately identify it as denial. A number of journalists
have written about a relatively new approach to climate denial adopted by some
Republicans and Trump appointees, which was pervasive during confirmation
hearings for Trump nominees in early 2017. The Atlantic’s Robinson Meyer
described it thusly: “A nominee first recognized the reality of ‘some’ global
warming—sounding appropriately grave and concerned about it—before they
pivoted to casting doubt on whether humans were behind this warming, or even
whether a human influence could ever be known at all.” Vox’s David Roberts and
other climate journalists and advocates have described these sorts of deniers as
“lukewarmers.” As Mashable’s Andrew Freeman wrote, “In hearing after hearing,
Trump's cabinet nominees slipped through Democrats' grasp by uttering reasonable
enough statements that still significantly mischaracterized the state of climate
science, which holds that global warming is largely human-caused and is an urgent
threat — one that can only be addressed by making drastic cuts to greenhouse gas
emissions. … They moved from outright climate denial to a more subtle, insidious
and risky form.” [Media Matters, 3/16/17; Vox, 1/12/17; Mashable, 1/24/17]
24 segment that Pruitt stated that “scientists continue to disagree about the degree
and extent of global warming and its connection to the actions of mankind,” but
immediately followed Pruitt’s comments with the Union of Concerned Scientists’
Rachel Cleetus explaining, “This is the sort of climate denial that says, ‘Yes, it's
real. But we don't know what's causing it.’ And basically, it's yet another way to
kick the can down the road and not take any action.”
Pruitt's lukewarm denial was also on display on the Sunday shows. In a June 4
exchange, Chuck Todd, host of NBC’s Meet the Press, failed to note that Pruitt’s
statements were at odds with the scientific consensus that greenhouse gases
resulting from human activity are the dominant cause of global warming:
CHUCK TODD: Do you believe that CO2 is the primary cause [of climate
change]?
TODD: Primary?
PRUITT: It's a cause of many. It's a cause like methane and water vapor
and the rest.
TODD: All right, Scott Pruitt, I'm going to leave it there, because I know
you've got to run.
FOX’s Chris Wallace, on the other hand, noted the scientific inaccuracy of Pruitt's
claims during his April 2 interview with the EPA administrator on Fox News Sunday.
After airing footage of Pruitt downplaying the role of carbon dioxide in climate
change, Wallace said, “Mr. Pruitt, there are all kinds of studies that contradict you.
The U.N.'s panel on climate change says it is at least 95 percent likely that more
than half the temperature increase since the mid-20th century is due to human
activities. NOAA, that's our own National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
says there's more carbon dioxide now than in the last 400,000 years, and NOAA
says 2015 and 2016 are the two hottest years on record. Mr. Pruitt, are we
supposed to believe that that's all a coincidence?” [ABC’s World News Tonight,
1/18/17; CBS Evening News, 1/24/17; NBC’s Meet the Press, 6/4/17; Fox News
Sunday, 4/2/17]
CBS and PBS hosted guests who flatly denied climate change. CBS and PBS
were the only two networks to air interviews with subjects who explicitly disputed
the scientific consensus that human activity is the primary cause of global warming.
On April 22, CBS Evening News aired an interview with Joe Bast, president of
the Heartland Institute, a denialist conservative think tank, which began with
correspondent Dean Reynolds stating, “Scientists may worry about melting
polar ice, rising seas, or strengthening storms. But to Joe Bast, all of what
others call warning signs of climate change are just the natural order of
things.” Bast told Reynolds, “The efforts to stop global warming or slow it
down are way disproportional to what the science suggests would be
necessary,” and Reynolds paraphrased Bast as saying that climate change is
“a naturally occurring cyclical phenomenon caused mostly by the sun, not an
approaching disaster accelerated by carbon dioxide emissions caused by
humans.” Reynolds did note in the segment, however, that “most climate
scientists, the United Nations, as well as NASA, dismiss these arguments as
propaganda for fossil fuels.” [CBS Evening News, 4/22/17]
PBS and CBS did the best job of covering climate science
2017 was a notable year for climate research. 2017 saw a wealth of
important and alarming developments in climate-related scientific
research. To name just a few: Early in 2017, NASA and the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration confirmed that 2016 was earth’s hottest year on
record. In March, scientists reported that sea ice in both the Arctic and Antarctic
was at its lowest-ever levels, and three months later scientists concluded that 30
percent of the world's population is currently at risk of experiencing deadly heat
waves. In October, a report found that tropical forests, which were once thought to
be carbon sinks, are actually a net carbon source. In November, the Global Carbon
Project reported that global carbon dioxide emissions are again on the rise after
remaining flat for three years. December saw the release of research in the
developing field of attribution science, which assesses how climate change has
influenced individual extreme weather events: Two studies quantified the extent to
which climate change boosted Hurricane Harvey's rainfall, and another set of
studies found that human-caused climate change was a “significant driver” for 21 of
27 extreme weather events in 2016. Many of these developments received no
network coverage at all. [NASA.gov, 1/18/17; E&E News, 12/29/17;
InsideClimate News, 6/19/17; The Washington Post, 12/13/17; The New York
Times, 12/14/17]
PBS featured more scientists than the other networks combined. PBS
NewsHour interviewed or quoted more scientists in its climate coverage than all the
other networks combined -- 29 scientists, compared to a total of 27 scientists for
the others. CBS interviewed or quoted 14 scientists, NBC featured 10, ABC featured
three, and FOX featured none.
For second year in a row, Sunday shows did not feature a single scientist in
climate-related coverage. For two consecutive years, the Sunday morning news
shows have not featured any scientists in their climate coverage. The high point
was in 2014, when Sunday shows had a combined seven scientists on as guests to
discuss climate change. In 2015, they featured two scientists. [Media Matters,
3/23/17]
PBS and CBS led the networks in covering the Trump administration’s anti-
science moves as they relate to climate change. The Trump administration has
carried out a wide array of anti-science actions, including targeting climate science
in budget cuts, weakening science advisory boards and stacking them with industry
allies, disregarding scientific input, and scrubbing scientific data and the words
“climate change” from government websites. PBS and CBS led the networks in
coverage of the Trump administration’s efforts to suppress or hamper science as
related to climate change, airing 10 and eight segments, respectively. ABC aired
five such segments, NBC aired two, and FOX aired none. [Media Matters,
8/17/16; Union of Concerned Scientists, July 2017; InsideClimate
News, 5/24/17; Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, accessed 2/8/18]
FOX led the Sunday shows in climate coverage. Among the Sunday shows, Fox
News Sunday featured the most climate coverage (42 minutes), and CBS’ Face the
Nation featured the least (seven minutes). In between were ABC’s This Week (26
minutes) and NBC’s Meet the Press (21 minutes).
Evlondo Cooper and Lisa Hymas contributed research to this report. Charts by
Sarah Wasko.
Methodology
This report analyzes coverage of climate change between January 1, 2017, and
December 31, 2017, on four Sunday news shows (ABC's This Week, CBS' Face the
Nation, NBC's Meet the Press, and FOX Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday) and
four nightly news programs (ABC's World News Tonight, CBS Evening News, NBC
Nightly News, and PBS NewsHour) based on Nexis transcripts. FOX Broadcasting
Co. airs Fox News Sunday but does not air a nightly news equivalent; Fox News is a
separate cable channel. PBS NewsHour is a half-hour longer than its network
nightly news counterparts, but it airs five days a week, compared to seven days a
week for the other nightly news shows (PBS NewsHour Weekend was not included
in this analysis).
To identify news segments that discussed climate change, we searched for the
following terms in Nexis: climate change, global warming, changing climate, climate
warms, climate warming, warming climate, warmer climate, warming planet,
warmer planet, warming globe, warmer globe, global temperatures, rising
temperatures, hotter temperatures, climate science, and climate scientist. In some
instances, Nexis categorized a segment that did not mention one of our search
terms as being about climate change, and if the segment provided other clear
indications that it was indeed about climate change, it was included. In addition, we
counted all segments about the Paris climate accord as climate change segments,
since the purpose of the accord is to address climate change. To identify segments
networks aired on the Paris accord, we ran the following search in Nexis: paris
climate, climate accord, paris accord, climate agreement, paris agreement, and
climate deal.
Our analysis includes any segment devoted to climate change, as well as any
substantial mention (more than one paragraph of a news transcript or a definitive
statement by a media figure) about climate change impacts or actions. The study
did not include instances in which a non-media figure brought up climate change
without being prompted to do so by a media figure unless the media figure
subsequently addressed climate change. We defined media figures as hosts,
anchors, correspondents, and recurring guest panelists. The study also does not
include teasers if they were for segments that aired later on the same program. We
acquired time stamps from iQ media and applied them generously for nightly news
segments when the overall topic was related to climate change. For instance, if a
nightly news segment about an extreme weather event mentioned climate change
briefly, the entire segment was counted as climate coverage. However, if a
significant portion of the segment was not related to climate change, such as a
report on a politician giving a speech about climate change, immigration, voting
rights, and the economy, only the portions of the segment that discussed climate
change were counted. For the Sunday shows, which often feature wide-ranging
discussions on multiple topics, we used only the relevant portion of such
conversations. In the text of the report, figures have been rounded to the nearest
minute. Because PBS NewsHour is an hour-long show and the other networks’
nightly news programs are half-hour shows, our analysis compared PBS NewsHour's
climate coverage to other nightly news programs' coverage in terms of topics
covered and number of segments, but not in terms of number of minutes.