Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract
Deep infection of megaprostheses remains a serious complication in orthopedic tumor surgery. Despite the use of systemic and
local antibiotic prophylaxis the reported infection rate is between 5% and 35%. Silver-coated medical devices proved their
effectiveness in reducing infections. The objective of this study was to examine in vivo the antimicrobial efficacy and possible side-
effects of a silver-coated megaprosthesis. In a first study, 30 rabbits (15 titanium versus 15 silver-coated Mutarss—endoprostheses)
were infected with Staphylococcus aureus. In a second study, toxicological side effects were analyzed in 10 rabbits with a silver-
coated megaprosthesis.
The silver group showed significantly (po0.05) lower infection rates (7% versus 47%) in comparison with the titanium group.
Measurements of the C-reactive-protein, neutrophilic leukocytes, rectal temperature and body weight showed significant (po0.05)
lower signs of inflammation in the silver group. The analysis of the silver concentration in blood (median 1.883 ppb) and in organs
(0.798–86.002 ppb) showed elevated silver concentrations without pathologic changes in laboratory parameters and without
histological changes of organs. In conclusion, the new silver-coated Mutarss—megaprosthesis resulted in reduced infection rates
without toxicological side effects, suggesting that this prosthesis might be a promising device in tumor surgery exhibiting
antimicrobial activity.
r 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Antimicrobial; Antibacterial; Bone; Metal ion release; Metal ion toxicity; Metal surface treatment
0142-9612/$ - see front matter r 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.008
ARTICLE IN PRESS
5548 G. Gosheger et al. / Biomaterials 25 (2004) 5547–5556
2. Methods
3 months
these two animals were excluded for this point in time.
14,2
10,2
16,7
12,3
18,1
12,9
7,2
7,9
8,5
7,1
8,1
7,7
8,4
9,1
8,4
However, postmortem section revealed no evidence of
deep prosthetic infection in both cases. Including these
Overview of the macroscopic/microscopic and microbiologic results, the weight and the laboratory values preoperatively and on the 90th postoperative day in the T-group (n=15)
values in the statistical analysis there is still an overall
Preop.
significance for the parameters neutrophilic granulo-
10,3
11,1
9,4
7,9
4,6
8,7
6,3
3,3
6,2
7,6
6,7
7,1
7,5
6,3
8,4
cytes (p=0.032), lymphocytes (p=0.009) and monocytes
(p=0.034). Concerning the leukocytes (p=0.065) there
3 months
is still a trend to notice but not a significant result.
66
8,8
71
19,9
13,5
20,6
60,2
18,1
65,1
19,9
47,6
66,8
62,1
55,1
62,8
The CRP values in the T-group were always higher
when compared to the A-group (p=0.015). Never-
theless, the CRP in the T-group was only increased in
the first two postoperative weeks and at the 56th
Preop.
61
63,2
61,8
58,8
66,3
52,8
56,2
58,2
63,5
69,2
64,6
50,9
51,1
72,6
64,2
postoperative day above the threshold value of 1 mg/
dl. In the A-group the CRP values were within the
normal range.
3 months
59
60
64,5
73,2
31,5
67,3
26,1
22,9
37,3
24,5
28,1
79,2
19,6
33,8
27,4
3.4. Macroscopic and microscopic examination
Preop.
25,1
27,6
31,6
27,8
36,8
36,4
36,2
25,7
23,1
22,8
35,9
38,5
18,9
25,8
30
observed in seven from 15 rabbits (46.6%) (po0.025).
Microscopically, in four animals of the A-group (28.6%)
3 months
and in 10 animals of the T-group (66.7%) inflammatory
8930
9130
9060
9500
11230
19350
13620
15090
19120
18570
10850
11710
32910
10540
12810
infiltrates were observed (po0.05) (Tables 2 and 3).
9460
9050
7680
7260
8310
6340
12090
11520
12790
17000
12580
10860
16910
15350
10620
Microbiologic examination identified S. aureus in
three rabbits in the A-group. In one rabbit S. aureus was
isolated on the 56th and 90th day without macroscopi-
CRP
1,2
0,4
1,8
0,4
0,4
0,2
3,3
0,0
1,4
0,2
0,3
1,7
0,0
0,2
0,0
cally visible pus on postmortem section (rabbit 1 in
Table 3). In a second rabbit S. aureus grew on the 14th
CRP
0,4
0,4
0,3
0,1
0,1
1,0
1,4
0,1
0,0
0,2
0,0
1,0
0,0
0,1
1,0
postoperative day, but was not subsequently isolated
(rabbit 14 in Table 3). In a third animal S. aureus was
cultivated from the pus on the 90th day (rabbit 9 in
Weight Weight
4700
5110
5020
4850
3550
3150
3700
5600
4900
5850
4800
4200
4600
5300
5900
Table 3). In this case inflammation was also proven
histologically.
Inflammatory Bacteria at section Preop.
S. aureus
S. aureus
S. aureus
S. aureus
infiltrates
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Pos.
Pos.
Pos.
Pos.
Pos.
Pos.
Pos.
Pos.
Pos.
Pos.
no pus
no pus
no pus
no pus
no pus
no pus
no pus
pus
pus
pus
pus
pus
pus
Animal
Monocytes
3 months
13,7
10,2
13,4
9
6
6,2
5,5
7,5
6,5
9,7
9,7
5,6
9,4
6,4
Monocytes
Overview of the macroscopic/microscopic and microbiologic results, the weight and the laboratory values preoperatively and on the 90th postoperative day in the A-group (n=14)
Preop.
13,9
10,1
5
3
6,4
6,3
6,8
8,6
9,6
5,5
7,7
0,7
5,2
7,6
Lymphocytes
3 months
69
45,6
63,3
61,2
53,2
58,9
52,3
70,2
16,8
55,7
58,1
71,5
33,5
17,2
Lymphocytes
implant and stable silver coating (three axial sections of the implant).
65
50
62
64,2
61,6
63,7
58,6
67,6
62,9
63,1
51,6
60,1
57,5
53,6
In tight connection to the implant a rim of ossified tissue could be seen
macroscopically. The presence of grey material at the periphery of
Granulocytes
32
26,9
21,3
35,9
32,6
35,9
22,2
68,1
32,8
30,2
21,9
52,8
72,6
Granulocytes
Preop.
34
27,1
29,7
28,1
23,5
30,7
25,5
34,5
27,2
23,6
33,1
35,9
33,3
26,6
Leucocytes
3 months
9530
6810
9350
9540
8660
6510
14580
12700
13490
13240
12100
10410
16670
16010
Leucocytes
Preop.
8540
7650
7660
8780
7280
16340
10770
13930
14280
11190
10430
13260
13090
10190
3 months
CRP
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,6
0,2
1,5
1,8
0,1
3,4
0,7
Preop.
CRP
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0,2
0,3
0,1
0,1
0,1
0,2
0,4
(10 amplification).
4400
5600
5200
4830
4350
5300
5400
4780
4750
5180
4900
4550
4830
4700
Weight
Preop.
5180
5200
4650
4450
3900
4500
4900
4050
5180
3470
4400
3910
4900
4620
S. aureus
infiltrates
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Pos.
Pos.
Pos.
Pos.
no pus
no pus
no pus
no pus
no pus
Animal
(Silver)
suppuration. The general condition concerning weight cellular response will be assessed by histology, electron
gain and laboratory values (leucocytes and CRP) were microscopy and measuring bone proteins like, e.g.
significantly better in the A-group. These findings osteocalcin and collagen I.
suggest, that in the A-group, the animals were able to In contrast, other authors reported about no cyto-
resist the injected bacteria. S. aureus was not able to toxic effects of silver and its good biocompatibilty
cause infection with systemic illness. [11,54–57]. These conflicting results probably can be
In view of silver’s potential for toxicity, regardless of explained by varying silver concentrations acting on
how limited it may appear to be, extensive research is different cell types. It is well known that silver toxicity is
still essential [24]. The most common condition in silver a dose-dependent process. Elementary silver is an inert
exposed people is argyria, a gray–blue discoloration of metal and is ionized only slowly in the organism [12,47].
the tissues (e.g. skin). It was seen more commonly in the Due to the oligodynamic effect, the silver release is
19th century associated with occupational exposure in comparatively low and has been evaluated in previous
silversmiths, miner and photographs [24,43]. Argyria studies [13]. Therefore, elementary silver is regarded as
can also appear from the use of silver-containing low cytotoxic only [54,58]. In the current study the silver
medications [24,43–45]. In the literature the total silver concentrations around the prosthesis and in the organs
concentration, which is associated with a systemic did not cause histological changes or functional deficits
argyrosis, amounted to 4–6 g silver [12,16,46,47]. We of the organs.
calculated the amount of silver, which is necessary for In this study silver concentrations in the blood were
the coating of a total femoral replacement in humans on average 1.88 ppb. Silver levels below 10 ppb were
(prosthesis length 350 mm, diameter 25 mm, thickness of considered as normal [12]. Toxic side effects were
the coating 0.004 mm), to be 1.154 g. Therefore, systemic described for blood concentrations of 300 ppb in the
argyrosis is unlikely. form of argyrosis, leukopenia, liver and kidney damage
In most cases the silver deposition does not cause [12,16,25]. In studies using silver-coated heart valves, the
apparent ill-effects, despite markedly elevated silver blood concentration did not exceed 22 ppb [12]. In this
levels [43,45,48]. Nevertheless, there are case reports, study no toxicological side effects were observed. In fact,
describing fatty degeneration of the liver, kidneys and the silver concentration was significantly elevated in all
heart [43]. Toxic damage in the former mentioned analyzed organs, especially in the liver and the spleen
organs were described in Ref. [46]. Inhibition of the with mean values of 90.4 and 27.9 ppb, respectively.
proliferation of keratinocytes and fibroblasts after Although the functional parameters and histological
treatment with silver-sulfadiazin has been described examination of the organs revealed no pathologic
[49,50]. findings.
There are some reports describing a chronic inflam- Nevertheless, there are case reports describing adverse
matory reaction with thinner pannus and microabscess effects below a concentration of 300 ppb. Sudmann et al.
formation around the sewing cuff in patients treated by [59] report about a 76-year old woman, in whom a
a silver-coated heart valve. The poor tissue ingrowth can silver-impregnated bone cement was used in a total hip
lead to loosening of the sutures. The authors assume a replacement. Five years after insertion of the prosthesis
toxic reaction deriving from the silver released from the she developed serious neurological deficits with senso-
impregnated sewing cuff, which may lead to an motoric deficits of the ipsilateral extremity despite silver
inhibition of normal fibroblast response [51–53]. Since concentration in the joint cavity and in the serum did
silver concentrations are not measured in the environ- not exceed 103 and 6.3 ppb, respectively. In general
ment tissue, coherence of this factors cannot be proved neurologic side effect are extremely rare. In a study of 30
until now. Tweden et al. [16] reported no evidence of silver-intoxicated patients no paralysis of muscles are
silver toxicity to cultured fibroblasts until concentra- reported [48].
tions reached levels of 1200 ppb. Therefore, the forma- In summary, silver coating of materials is easy to
tion of a thinner pannus has not to be an expression of perform with a galvanic coating of the endoprosthetic
cytotoxicity, but can be related to a possibly chronic device. The cost of a silver-coated endoprosthesis will be
inflammatory reaction by elementary silver in the very about 5–7% higher than a non coated implant, whereas
close environment of a silver-coated medical device. A a reduction in the incidence of infections would result in
poor tissue ingrowth does not have any comparable less revision surgery including the reimplantation of a
dramatic effect in orthopedic implants like it has in heart new endoprosthesis. Therefore, prevention of these
valve replacement surgery. Nevertheless, inhibition of infections would have an important impact on patient
osteoblasts by elementary silver cannot be excluded. morbidity and the cost effectiveness of hospital care
Therefore, in the current study the silver coating was not [17,21]. The data from the current animal experiment
expanded to the prosthetic stem. In a further animal also confirms the results of former studies, in which the
study the effect of silver-coated stems in a total hip infection rate of silver-coated medical devices has been
replacement concerning the osseous ingrowth and reduced. In the future, it will be necessary to implant
ARTICLE IN PRESS
G. Gosheger et al. / Biomaterials 25 (2004) 5547–5556 5555
silver-coated megaprostheses in humans in order to [13] Jansen B, Rinck M, Wolbring P, Strohmeier A, Jahns T. In vitro
assess possible toxic side effects and to determine the evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy and biocompatibility of a
infection rate of tumor patients with various diseases silver-coated central venous catheter. J Biomater Appl 1994;9(1):
55–70.
and immunodeficiency caused by the tumor disease itself [14] Karchmer TB, Giannetta ET, Muto CA, Strain BA, Farr BM. A
and by chemo- and radiation therapy. randomized crossover study of silver-coated urinary catheters in
hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med 2000;160(21):3294–8.
[15] Plowman R, Graves N, Esquivel J, Roberts JA. An economic
Acknowledgements model to assess the cost and benefits of the routine use of silver
alloy coated urinary catheters to reduce the risk of urinary tract
infections in catheterized patients. J Hosp Infect 2001;48(1):33–42.
The authors gratefully thank Robert Grimer, M.D., [16] Tweden KS, Cameron JD, Razzouk AJ, Holmberg WR, Kelly SJ.
Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham for revising Biocompatibility of silver-modified polyester for antimicrobial
the paper as a native speaking orthopedic surgeon who protection of prosthetic valves. J Heart Valve Dis 1997;6(5):
is specialized in orthopedic oncology. The study was 553–61.
supported by grants of implantcast corp., Buxtehude [17] von Eiff C, Proctor RA, Peters G. Coagulase-negative staphylo-
cocci. Pathogens have major role in nosocomial infections.
Germany and by equipment of Merck company, Postgrad Med 2001;110(4):63–4, 69–70, 73–6.
Darmstadt Germany and by Ethicon, Hamburg Ger- [18] Brause BD. Infected orthopedic prostheses. In: Bisno AL,
many. Waldrogel FA, editors. Infections associated with indwelling
medical devices. Washington, DC: American Society for Micro-
biology; 1989.
[19] von Eiff C, Peters G, Heilmann C. Pathogenesis of infections due
References
to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Lancet Infect Dis 2002;
2(11):677–85.
[1] Ham SJ, Schraffordt Koops H, Veth RP, van Horn JR, Molenaar
[20] Olson ME, Harmon BG, Kollef MH. Silver-coated endotracheal
WM, Hoekstra HJ. Limb salvage surgery for primary bone
tubes associated with reduced bacterial burden in the lungs of
sarcoma of the lower extremities: long-term consequences of
mechanically ventilated dogs. Chest 2002;121(3):863–70.
endoprosthetic reconstructions. Ann Surg Oncol 1998;5(5):
[21] Herrmann M, Peters G. Catheter-associated infections caused by
423–36.
coagulase-negative staphylococci: clinical and biological aspects.
[2] Mittermayer F, Krepler P, Dominkus M, Schwameis E, Sluga M,
New York: Marcel Dekker; 1997.
Heinzl H, et al. Long-term followup of uncemented tumor
[22] Grimer RJ, Belthur M, Chandrasekar C, Carter SR, Tillman RM.
endoprostheses for the lower extremity. Clin Orthop 2001;388:
Two-stage revision for infected endoprostheses used in tumor
167–77.
surgery. Clin Orthop 2002;395:193–203.
[3] Capanna R, Morris HG, Campanacci D, Del Ben M, Campanacci
[23] Klasen HJ. Historical review of the use of silver in the treatment
M. Modular uncemented prosthetic reconstruction after resection
of burns. I. Early uses. Burns 2000;26(2):117–30.
of tumours of the distal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994;76(2):
178–86. [24] Hollinger MA. Toxicological aspects of topical silver pharma-
[4] Malawer MM, Chou LB. Prosthetic survival and clinical results ceuticals. Crit Rev Toxicol 1996;26(3):255–60.
with use of large-segment replacements in the treatment of high- [25] Chambers C, Proctor C, Kabler P. Bactericidal effect of low
grade bone sarcomas. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77(8):1154–65. concentrations of silver. J Am Water Works Association 1962:
[5] Ritschl P, Capanna R, Helwig U, Campanacci M, Kotz R. 208–216.
KMFTR (Kotz modular femur tibia reconstruction system) [26] Illingworth B, Bianco RW, Weisberg S. In vivo efficacy of silver-
modular tumor endoprosthesis system for the lower extremity. coated fabric against Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Heart Valve
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1992;130(4):290–3. Dis 2000;9(1):135–41.
[6] Safran MR, Kody MH, Namba RS, Larson KR, Kabo JM, [27] Bragg PD, Rainnie DJ. The effect of silver ions on the respiratory
Dorey FJ, et al. 151 endoprosthetic reconstructions for patients chain of Escherichia coli. Can J Microbiol 1974;20(6):883–9.
with primary tumors involving bone. Contemp Orthop [28] Schierholz JM, Lucas LJ, Rump A, Pulverer G. Efficacy of silver-
1994;29(1):15–25. coated medical devices. J Hosp Infect 1998;40(4):257–62.
[7] Wirganowicz PZ, Eckardt JJ, Dorey FJ, Eilber FR, Kabo JM. [29] Sioshansi P. New processes for surface treatment of catheters.
Etiology and results of tumor endoprosthesis revision surgery in Artif Organs 1994;18(4):266–71.
64 patients. Clin Orthop 1999;358:64–74. [30] McLean RJ, Hussain AA, Sayer M, Vincent PJ, Hughes DJ,
[8] Hillmann A, Gosheger G, Hoffmann C, Ozaki T, Winkelmann Smith TJ. Antibacterial activity of multilayer silver-copper
W. Rotationplasty-surgical treatment modality after failed limb surface films on catheter material. Can J Microbiol 1993;39(9):
salvage procedure. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2000;120(10): 895–9.
555–8. [31] Newton T, Still JM, Law E. A comparison of the effect of early
[9] Kotz R, Ritschl P, Trachtenbrodt J. A modular femur-tibia insertion of standard latex and silver-impregnated latex foley
reconstruction system. Orthopedics 1986;9(12):1639–52. catheters on urinary tract infections in burn patients. Infect
[10] Shih LY, Sim FH, Pritchard DJ, Rock MG, Chao EY. Segmental Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23(4):217–8.
total knee arthroplasty after distal femoral resection for tumor. [32] Saint S, Elmore JG, Sullivan SD, Emerson SS, Koepsell TD. The
Clin Orthop 1993;292:269–81. efficacy of silver alloy-coated urinary catheters in preventing
[11] Boswald M, Mende K, Bernschneider W, Bonakdar S, Ruder H, urinary tract infection: a meta-analysis. Am J Med 1998;105(3):
Kissler H, et al. Biocompatibility testing of a new silver- 236–41.
impregnated catheter in vivo. Infection 1999;27(Suppl. 1):S38–42. [33] Sheng WH, Ko WJ, Wang JT, Chang SC, Hsueh PR, Luh KT.
[12] Brutel de la Riviere A, Dossche KM, Birnbaum DE, Hacker R. Evaluation of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters for
First clinical experience with a mechanical valve with silver prevention of catheter-related infection in intensive care unit
coating. J Heart Valve Dis 2000;9(1):123–9; discussion 129–30. patients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2000;38(1):1–5.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
5556 G. Gosheger et al. / Biomaterials 25 (2004) 5547–5556
.
[34] Bach A, Bohrer .
H, Bottiger BW, Motsch J, Martin E. Reduction [47] Perrelli G, Piolatto G. Tentative reference values for gold, silver
of bacterial colonization of triple-lumen catheters with antiseptic and platinum: literature data analysis. Sci Total Environ
bonding in septic patients. Anaesthesiology 1994;81:261. 1992;120(1–2):93–6.
[35] Maki DG, Wheeler SJ, Stolz SM. Study of a novel antiseptic- [48] Rosenman KD, Moss A, Kon S. Argyria: clinical implications of
coated central venous catheter. Crit Care Med 1999;19(Suppl.):99. exposure to silver nitrate and silver oxide. J Occup Med
[36] Pai MP, Pendland SL, Danziger LH. Antimicrobial-coated/ 1979;21(6):430–5.
bonded and -impregnated intravascular catheters. Ann Pharmac- [49] Kuroyanagi Y, Kim E, Shioya N. Evaluation of a synthetic
other 2001;35(10):1255–63. wound dressing capable of releasing silver sulfadiazine. J Burn
[37] Ramsay J, Nolte F, Schwarzmann S. Incidence of catheter Care Rehabil 1991;12(2):106–15.
colonization and catheter related infections with an antiseptic [50] McCauley RL, Linares HA, Pelligrini V, Herndon DN, Robson
impregnated triple lumen catheter. Crit Care Med 1994;22: MC, Heggers JP. In vitro toxicity of topical antimicrobial agents
A115. to human fibroblasts. J Surg Res 1989;46(3):267–74.
[38] Goldschmidt H, Hahn U, Salwender HJ, Haas R, Jansen B, [51] Butany J, Scully HE, VanArsdell G, Leask R. Prosthetic heart
Wolbring P, et al. Prevention of catheter-related infections by valves with silver-coated sewing cuff fabric: early morphological
silver coated central venous catheters in oncological patients. features in two patients. Can J Cardiol 2002;18(7):733–8.
Zentralbl Bakteriol 1995;283(2):215–23. [52] Tozzi P, Al-Darweesh A, Vogt P, Stumpe F. Silver-coated
[39] Collinge CA, Goll G, Seligson D, Easley KJ. Pin tract infections: prosthetic heart valve: a double-bladed weapon. Eur J Cardi-
silver vs uncoated pins. Orthopedics 1994;17(5):445–8. othorac Surg 2001;19(5):729–31.
[40] Darouiche RO, Meade R, Mansouri M, Raad II. In vivo efficacy [53] Schaff HV, Carrel TP, Jamieson WR, Jones KW, Rufilanchas JJ,
of antimicrobial-coated fabric from prosthetic heart valve sewing Cooley DA, et al. Paravalvular leak and other events in silzone-
rings. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7(6):639–46. coated mechanical heart valves: a report from avert. Ann Thorac
[41] Dahlberg PJ, Agger WA, Singer JR, Yutuc WR, Newcomer KL, Surg 2002;73(3):785–92.
Schaper A, et al. Subclavian hemodialysis catheter infections: a [54] Greil J, Spies T, Boswald M, Bechert T, Lugauer S, Regenfus A,
prospective, randomized trial of an attachable silver-impregnated et al. Analysis of the acute cytotoxicity of the Erlanger silver
cuff for prevention of catheter-related infections. Infect Control catheter. Infection 1999;27(Suppl. 1):S34–7.
Hosp Epidemiol 1995;16(9):506–11. [55] Bosetti M, Masse A, Tobin E, Cannas M. Silver coated materials
[42] Riley DK, Classen DC, Stevens LE, Burke JP. A large for external fixation devices: in vitro biocompatibility and
randomized clinical trial of a silver-impregnated urinary catheter: genotoxicity. Biomaterials 2002;23(3):887–92.
lack of efficacy and staphylococcal superinfection. Am J Med [56] Hachem RY, Wright KC, Zermeno A, Bodey GP, Raad II.
1995;98(4):349–56. Evaluation of the silver iontophoretic catheter in an animal
[43] White JM, Powell AM, Brady K, Russell-Jones R. Severe model. Biomaterials 2003;24(20):3619–22.
generalized argyria secondary to ingestion of colloidal silver [57] Oloffs A, Grosse-Siestrup C, Bisson S, Rinck M, Rudolph R,
protein. Clin Exp Dermatol 2003;28(3):254–6. Gross U. Biocompatibility of silver-coated polyurethane catheters
[44] Fisher NM, Marsh E, Lazova R. Scar-localized argyria secondary and silver-coated Dacron material. Biomaterials 1994;15(10):
to silver sulfadiazine cream. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;49(4): 753–8.
730–2. [58] Liedberg H, Lundeberg T. Assessment of silver-coated urinary
[45] Steininger H, Langer E, Stommer P. Generalized argyrosis. Dtsch catheter toxicity by cell culture. Urol Res 1989;17(6):359–60.
Med Wochenschr 1990;115(17):657–62. [59] Sudmann E, Vik H, Rait M, Todnem K, Andersen KJ, Julsham
[46] Wan AT, Conyers RA, Coombs CJ, Masterton JP. Determination K, et al. Systemic and local silver accumulation after total hip
of silver in blood, urine, and tissues of volunteers and burn replacement using silver-impregnated bone cement. Med Prog
patients. Clin Chem 1991;37(10 Part 1):1683–7. Technol 1994;20(3–4):179–84.