Wendustrialist alleged to be part of a project that the Israeli leader tried to push forward to promote

Hollywood producer Milchan.

The name of Ratan Tata figures in the Israeli police recommendations seeking to indict Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu on graft charges, according to an Israeli media report, which was today dismissed
by the Indian industrialist’s office as “grossly incorrect” in its references about him.

In the so-called Case 1000, in which Mr. Netanyahu and his wife, Sara, are suspected of receiving illicit
gifts from billionaire benefactors, Israeli-born Hollywood producer Milchan and Australian resort owner
James Packer, the Indian Industrialist is also said to be a part of a project that the Israeli leader tried to
push forward to help Milchan.

“According to the police, the most glaring example of Netanyahu working against Israel’s interests to
benefit Milchan was his efforts (to) promote a free trade zone on the Israel-Jordan border, a project the
Hollywood producer sought to promote as part of his partnership with Indian Industrialist Ratan Naval
Tata,” Ynetnews reported.

‘Huge profit’

The project, which police noted went against the recommendations of the defence establishment,
would have generated Milchan and Tata “a huge profit,” but ended up being scrapped because it
would’ve cost the state an unreasonable amount in security expenses, the news portal said.

Commenting on the news report, the Indian industrialist’s office on Wednesday told PTI that it’s “grossly
incorrect in its references about Mr. Ratan N. Tata.”

Last year, the Israeli media reported that Mr. Tata “testified” before the Israeli police in connection to
these allegation during his trip to Tel Aviv in the end of October-November on the sidelines of a business
event.

A statement emailed to PTI by Mr. Tata’s office did not deny the meeting between him and the Israeli
officials. But it said the reports in Israeli media on the contents of the meeting are “factually incorrect
and appear to have been motivated.”

Post a Comment
Receive the best of The Hindu delivered to your inbox everyday!

ENTER YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS

GO

More In

Internationalbusiness (general) India corruption & bribery heads of state police Israel

Related Articles

SPONSORED CONTENT

6 Dating Sites that Really Work in Durham

6 Dating Sites that Really Work in Durham

Top UK Dating Sites

People Who Had Barclaycard Credit Cards - Read This

People Who Had Barclaycard Credit Cards …

PPI Checker

Have you had an Interest Only Mortgage? You may be due compensation!

Have you had an Interest Only Mortgage? You may…

Mortgage.Claims

This Game brings the Elf Fantasy World to Life

This Game brings the Elf Fantasy World to Life

Elvenar

Famous Cheating Guys

Famous Cheating Guys

SOFEMININE

Frank Bruno has reacted to reports he’s going to fight Tyson Fury with perfect tweet

Frank Bruno has reacted to reports he’s going to fight…

GiveMeSport

Fury says Mike Tyson would KO him in one round - Tyson’s response is brilliant
Fury says Mike Tyson would KO him in one round …

GiveMeSport

Goldman Sachs Analysts predict that the price of Bitcoin could sourge as high as 30.000 $

Goldman Sachs Analysts predict that the price of…

247finance.me will collect facts and evidence about the outfit, says Home Ministry official

Kerala has asked for a ban on the Popular Front of India (PFI), a Muslim organisation that is mainly
operating out of the State, Minister of State for Home Affairs Kiren Rijiju has said.

The issue was discussed at the annual DGP meet held in Madhya Pradesh’s Tekanpur in January, where
Kerala police chief Lokanath Behera gave a detailed presentation on the PFI’s growth and activities in
the State.

The session was attended by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Home Minister Rajnath Singh and other
senior officials in the security establishment. “Kerala has pressed for a ban on the PFI and we are
examining the case,” said Mr. Rijiju.

Mr. Behera listed four cases where members of the PFI were involved in criminal activities, said a senior
Home Ministry official. The Centre will collect more facts and evidence about the activities of the outfit
before declaring it an “unlawful association”, the official added.

Attempts to reach Mr. Behera for his comments were not successful.

ALSO READ

ED plans money laundering probe against PFI activists

“It has never happened in the past that activities of a particular organisation were discussed threadbare
at a DGP meet. The PFI is under the scanner, but is not yet banned. On earlier occasions, organisations
like SIMI (Students’ Islamic Movement of India) and Indian Mujahideen were discussed at DGP meets,
but only after they were banned,” said the official.
The DGP meet is an annual affair organised by the Intelligence Bureau where issues concerning internal
security are discussed.

The National Investigation Agency had last year sent a detailed report to the Home Ministry and
mentioned four cases where cadres of the PFI had either been charge-sheeted or convicted.

Another official in the security establishment said the ban could come not before April as lots of
paperwork was pending.

In 2010, some members of the PFI, armed with weapons, attacked Professor T. J. Joseph in
Muvattupuzha, Ernakulam district, and chopped off his right palm. Mr. Joseph was targeted over a
question paper he set for a college examination that had some references to the Prophet Mohammad,
which the attackers said insulted the Prophet.

In May 2015, a court convicted 13 PFI activists in the case.

The NIA said it examined nine cases where men and women converted to Islam and in at least four of
them, the involvement of members of the PFI was established.

Post a Comment

Receive the best of The Hindu delivered to your inbox everyday!

ENTER YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS

GO

More In

NationalKeralaKerala

SPONSORED CONTENT

Achtung! Do You Know German WWII Terms? (Quiz)

Achtung! Do You Know German WWII Terms? (Quiz)

HowStuffWorks

BBC Weather: Carol Kirkwood’s tight blue dress leaves viewers distracted ‘Had to re-watch’BBC
Weather: Carol Kirkwood’s tight blue dress leaves viewers distracted ‘Had to re-watch’

BBC Weather: Carol Kirkwood’s tight blue…

The Express

Step into a World of Fantasy in this Game

Step into a World of Fantasy in this Game

Elvenar

The letter Muhammad Ali wrote to Frank Bruno in 1993 has left everyone speechless

The letter Muhammad Ali wrote to Frank Bruno in…

GiveMeSport

The Unusual Link Between Eggs And Diabetes

The Unusual Link Between Eggs And Diabetes

healthnewstips.today

[Gallery] 30 Most Beautiful Female Armed Forces in the World

[Gallery] 30 Most Beautiful Female Armed Forces in…

Coolimba

Discuss Bitcoin Trading strategies with eToro’s top traders

Discuss Bitcoin Trading strategies with eToro’s top…

content.etoro.com

Ever owned an Egg card? You could be due a refund…

Ever owned an Egg card? You could be due a refund…

Consumer Refunds

Over 61 And Worried About Your Interest-Only Mortgage?

Over 61 And Worried About Your Interest-Only…

Telegraph Equity Releaseo take an aggressive approach and beg for forgiveness rather than ask for
permission, with regulation entities needing more time to fully define the rules of this new game.
The Screen Starts Its Decline

Aaron Shapiro, CEO

Technology will become more ubiquitous in our lives, but we will spend less time staring at screens. This
will be in part a reaction to how screens have taken over our lives, and in part facilitated by the success
of devices like Airpods, improvements in mobile computing and mobile data, and the rollout of smart
environments that ambiently collect information about you in order to give you better experiences and
customer service. This will create major headaches for marketers and agencies, as so much of our focus
for the last 50 years has been what happens on a screen in front of us.

Digital has taken over the world, but it’s been based in an “engagement economy”: a business model of
encouraging and incentivizing addiction. This has left us all staring endlessly at our screens, scrolling
through social feeds and clicking on things that make us less productive, not more. This year, we’ll see
the beginning of the end of this era.

Data Ethics Becomes a Thing

Michael Horn, Managing Director, Data Science

In 2018, add “data ethics” to the job description of every data scientist. Why? Because even as we
debate the future ethical programming of AI, we’re missing critical, immediate opportunities to ensure
human intelligence respects user identity, health, and safety. Today, too often, aggressive marketing
tactics, biased selection algorithms, and a desire for raw efficiency sacrifice respect for user needs and
rights. Think of targeting and ranking that inadvertently uses race or gender as proxies, predatory
lending to distressed consumers based on their credit profile, and call center and support automation
that doesn’t actually solve customer needs. In 2018, organizations need to educate and incentivize their
data-science teams to be as ethical as they are effective by establishing codes of ethics, training, and
clear guidance on how to report concerns.

Wellness Goes Mainstream

Julie Minchew, Planning Director

The phrase “health is wealth” has taken on new meaning in past years. Wellness has become more of a
luxury good for the privileged than an accessible way of living for the majority. The rise in designer
athleisure, expensive workout studios, superfood bars, and wellness tourism has made fitness a status
symbol — something the wealthy buy instead of something anyone can achieve. Two thousand eighteen
will be the year this changes. Wellness will finally go mainstream and permeate everything from building
design to business initiatives. Because, as Global Wellness Institute researchers note, “the future
prospects of the wellness economy will be limited if it becomes a luxury segment that depends primarily
on wealthy consumers.”

We’ve started to see the beginnings of this exclusive bubble bursting as Anthropologie launches a
wellness-dedicated store, P&G acquires an aluminum-free deodorant brand, and traditional sports
stadiums offer vegan fare and kombucha. A sense of wellness is something consumers will now expect
from all brand experiences — asking how does this fit within my overall desired well-being? As
marketers, we will need to think about how our products and brand systems contribute to a greater
demand for balance of mind and body. Because as traditional health care continues to remain uncertain,
the future of wellness will be made widely available with everything being seen as a way to take control
of our health.

Make Way for the “And” Interfaces

Sophie Kleber, Executive Director, Product and Innovation

Two thousand sixteen was the year of VR. Last year was the year of voice. While the tech industry
searches for this year’s next big thing, every UX designer knows that users are channel agnostic. As
technology allows for more and more ways to interact with machines, users expect the interactions to
become more and more intuitive, and the only solution we’ll explore in 2018 in user-centric design is
“And” interfaces.

“And” interfaces combine various input/output methods to make a user interaction as easy and
seamless as possible, while using each channel in the way it can provide the most value. Imagine you’d
like to chat with your bank about reducing your spending. Ask the voice interface to run the analysis,
then have the voice interface walk you through your options as a graphical user interface visualizes what
you can do. The voice and GUI interfaces work together, giving the user the best of both worlds. Imagine
giving feedback at a store by hitting a “Sad” button on a kiosk, then specifying what you didn’t like about
the experience by speaking to the machine, instead of having to type or take a survey.

Last year, we saw some attempts to capitalize on the “And” interface trend with Amazon’s Echo Show.
Unfortunately, the gadget failed on the integration front: Instead of making a tiny screen that looks like
the first video telephone, Amazon should have integrated with the big screen that’s already in the
house — the TV. Amazon’s approach of being “the AOL of voice,” the gateway to all voice interactions,
just as AOL was the gateway to the internet, is short-lived in the new world of “And.” Ecosystems will
have to collaborate not only on the software side, but also start opening up their hardware platforms to
give users the freedom of interaction they expect, while brands figure out how to gather the data they
need to adapt to user preferences.

Women Take Center Stage

Jacque Jordan, Director, Research

Finally, it seems, the voices of women are being heard. Rather than checking out after the last
presidential election, women have become more energized and determined — leading the charge in
many communities, boardrooms, and political and gender battles. Women are bringing others together,
encouraging empathy, inclusion, diversity of thoughts, words, and actions. This year will be about and
led by women, and the people who design for users first would be well advised to consider women in
the decisions they make.

Brands Team Up to Battle the Behemoths

Richard Swain, VP, Brand Strategy and Identity

Collaboration will become a key strategic pillar in companies’ efforts to combat the dominance of
Google and Amazon and the ever-present threat of Silicon Valley upstarts. Open APIs and shared data
will fuel the creation of new consumer brands, such as the digital-payments network Zelle. Backed by
leading banks and credit unions, Zelle connects backend operations to give users a single, digital-first
interface designed around their individual needs. Or consider the retail technology network OneMarket
(previously Westfield retail solutions), which is uniting retailers through the powe

To look forward, we took a look back. What we saw informed the directions we think marketing, design,
and technology will go. Naturally, we couldn’t ignore the political issues dividing our country, forcing
everyone, brands included, to take decisive stands. This new social consciousness will continue, and as
users continue to passionately pick ideological sides, brands stay neutral at their peril.

But 2018 won’t be just about politics. As in the past, technology, for instance, will continue to play a
dominant role in our everyday lives, but perhaps in more subtle ways than we predicted before.
Augmented reality hasn’t infiltrated our offices, but devices such as Airpods, improvements in mobile
computing and mobile data, and the rise of smart environments that ambiently collect data about users
may provide better customer experiences for everyone. Read more about these potential developments
and other crystal-ball prognostications sourced from our colleagues at Huge.
Companies Build Mission-Based Strategies

Mike May, VP, Strategy

In many ways, 2017 can be categorized as a year of social consciousness: It began with over four million
Women’s March participants creating the largest single-day demonstration in U.S. history; the most
powerful sports league on the planet became an unwitting platform for civil rights; and Time’s Person of
the Year was awarded to the Silence Breakers responsible for the #MeToo movement that is righting
wrongs in Hollywood, Washington, D.C., and every place in between.

What does this mean for brands? Values matter.

Increasingly, shoppers and prospective employees are evaluating who they buy from and work for based
not just on extrinsic qualities like price and paycheck, but intrinsic attributes like a company’s stance on
social issues, actions with respect to issues like climate change and gay rights, and mission. In 2012,
when Patagonia became the first California company to designate itself as a Benefit Corporation,
tethering its business objectives firmly to its mission, its values-first approach was a meaningful point of
differentiation. Today a clear value system is becoming a cost of doing business. Over 5,000 companies
in a range of industries are now registered as Benefit Corporations, including Etsy, Warby Parker, and
New Belgium Brewing. The last time I saw this much activity around an ascending strategic consideration
was in the late 1990s, when brands were rushing to define their digital strategy. This year, brands will
get serious about defining their mission-based strategy and weaving it into all layers of their business.

Winning Brands Incite Passion

Jason Schlossberg, Managing Director, Communications

Last year, we saw how our cognitive biases shape our perceptions of reality. Two people can see the
exact same thing and interpret its meaning completely differently. What’s an admission of sexual assault
to many is “locker-room talk” to others. Is taking a knee during the National Anthem an example of the
type of civil disobedience that makes the United States great, or an insult to the U.S. flag and the
soldiers that gave their lives on its behalf?

Increasingly, these divisions are playing out across political party lines. Experts call the phenomenon
“affective partisan polarization,” or “the mutual dislike between Republicans and Democrats.” Not
surprisingly, it has been cited as one of the primary drivers of the increasing gridlock in Washington,
D.C., over the past couple of decades. But I think we can all agree on at least one thing: What we are
currently in the midst of is something far more acute, and toxic, than just gridlock. Let’s call it affective
hyper-partisan polarization — a.k.a. a shit show.

Brands are not immune to, or isolated from, these trends. In 2017, some big brands, including Kellogg’s,
Audi, Starbucks, Target, New Balance, Nordstrom, Netflix, Neiman Marcus, HSN, Uber, T.J. Maxx, Keurig,
and Patagonia (to name just a few) received both adulation and condemnation for making decisions that
they deemed were in the best interests of their businesses. Negative reactions ran the spectrum, from
calls for boycotts on both sides of the political divide.

Is the lesson to be learned that, in order to avoid courting controversy, brands need to work harder to
appear neutral in 2018? Quite the contrary. In 2018, brands need to develop much thicker skins and be
satisfied with not appealing to everyone. Brands need to understand that consumer sentiment around a
particular issue has much less to do with facts and more to do with the tribal affiliations consumers
choose to associate themselves with. This is not to suggest that brands should have carte blanche to do
whatever they want, public opinion be damned. If a brand acts unethically, insensitively, or illegally, it
risks long-term damage to its reputation. But brands can’t be paralyzed from acting in their self-interest
or taking a stand on an issue simply because some people may disagree or not approve. In 2018, if
someone doesn’t hate you, you probably aren’t very relevant.

Biometrics Create Personalized Digital Experiences

Thomas Prommer, Managing Director, Technology

We’ll see a surge in focus and discussion around what I call the offline cookie: using biometric attributes
for personal-identity recognition at scale. Where Apple is currently leading the effort by leveraging facial
and thumbprint information to give you access to your most intimate data, we will see technology
organizations and marketers alike increasingly leverage different kinds of biometrics to deliver more
meaningful and personalized digital experiences.

The imagined use cases are plentiful: Can the unique tones of your voice allow you to continue the
morning conversation you had with Alexa at home with your CarPlay’s Siri while you commute to work?
Can kiosk applications at fast-food restaurants remember your last order at any other restaurant based
on your facial attributes? Can paying at a grocery store become as seamless as flashing a big smile to the
cashier, as is being trialled in China’s KFC branches? Can your retina eye information fast-track you
through more of life’s lines than the airport queue, as is currently being offered by the Clear airport
screening product?
Strong security and privacy regulations will be vital in this world, but if history is any indication of the
future, we can expect companies t