Mainstream Science is a Religion

May 30, 2016

Makia Freeman, Contributor

Waking Times

Science is a religion. Mainstream science, despite all its claims of objectivity, and despite the
fact it attempts to lay claim to the truth, is itself a religion. Science places itself on a pedestal
and assures everyone it has dispassionately arrived at its conclusions. Meanwhile, however, it
is full of assumptions, denials and limitations, and makes the serious mistake of presenting its
theories as facts. The errors of mainstream science are gladly seized upon by technocrats,
eager to use science and technology to further their own ambitions of control, and include
forcing the vaccine, GMO, surveillance, manmade global
warming, geoengineering, SMART and microchipping agendas onto an unsuspecting public.

The planned New World Order has a massive technocratic aspect. Materialism, the driving
force behind mainstream science, has been shown again and again to lack the capacity to
explain the world around us, especially in relation to idealism or other theories that account
for the energetic nature of reality. Yet, despite this, we remain collectively bedazzled by
materialism, because science is a religion that has induced a certain faith in us.

Up until recently, it has still been difficult for society at large to accept the fact that the
unseen energetic realms are more powerful and more primal than the material realms we can
see and touch … but that is starting to change.
Science is a Religion Going Back to Athens – Materialism vs. Idealism

This is certainly not the first time we have struggled with the debate of whether the world can
best be described by materialism. The ancient Greek philosophers and scientists thought
long and hard about the issue. Materialism vs. idealism is really the philosophical battle
between the ideas that matter exists independently (and that consciousness doesn’t exist or is
secondary), as opposed to the idea that consciousness, thought and energy are primary (and
that matter is secondary). Democritus championed the first viewpoint (and his ideas were
taken further by Aristotle), whereas Plato proposed the second with his famous theory of the
World of Forms or World of Ideas. According to Plato, our materialist reality is an inferior
copy of a more perfect world. This is exactly in alignment with what various cultures,
shamans, religions and spiritual traditions have been saying about the preeminence of energy
and mind over matter.

Even many distinguished mainstream Western scientists over the last 100+ years have
grasped the point that matter is not solid. Here are the very best and brightest of
them alluding to the fact that energy is preeminent to matter:

“All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an
atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must
assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the
matrix of all matter.” – Max Planck

“If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and
vibration.” – Nikola Tesla

“The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one
decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.” – Nikola Tesla

“The atoms or elementary particles themselves are not real; they form a world of
potentialities or possibilities rather than one of things or facts.” – Werner Heisenberg

“We may therefore regard matter as being constituted by the regions of space in which the
field is extremely intense … there is no place in this new kind of physics for the field and
matter, for the field is the only reality.” – Albert Einstein

“The field is the sole governing agency of the particle.” – Albert Einstein

“Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be regarded as real.” – Niels Bohr

Plato also wrote that the entire universe can be explained mathematically by numbers. This
exactly aligns itself with the idea that we live in a holographic universe – a kind of computer
simulation with digital numbers at its foundation.
The Renaissance: Reinforcing the Left-Brain Materialist View

The Renaissance was heralded as a golden age for humanity, and in many ways it was, but it
also further cemented the left-brain materialist view of the world, which can be found in the
works of Copernicus, Galileo, Descartes and Newton. Copernicus and Galileo famously
proposed heliocentrism over the existing geocentric model, but as the recent rise of the flat
earth movement has shown, there is a copious amount of evidence to suggest that the
heliocentric theory is far from being complete and foolproof. It was Descartes who famously
claimed “I think, therefore I am” and gave birth to the falsehood that thinking, reason and
logic is the base of our existence, when in fact being or consciousness is. There is no brain to
think without a consciousness that animates it.

Newton, for all the great work he did for physics, came up with a set of abstract,
mathematically-based, mechanical formulae which he called “the laws of nature”. Though he
was to live several centuries after Newton, genius inventor and true scientist Nikola Tesla
made a very telling comment regarding the tendency of mainstream science and scientists to
get stuck in a rut with their abstract mathematical theories. This statement could most
definitely be applied to Einstein, who despite his brilliance in proposing the theory of
relativity, worked for 3+ decades afterwards and could never come up with a more complete
theory. Tesla said:

“Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off
through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to
reality.” – Nikola Tesla
Darwinian Eugenics and Evolution

Charles Darwin, for those of youth didn’t know, was part of

an elite family who favored eugenics, and it is not surprising that his theory of evolution
emphasized dog-eat-dog competitiveness, survival of the fittest and might is right – all habits
and values of the psychopathic ruling class. Those who insist that the idea that “science is a
religion” is false may be hard-pressed to explain why someone like Darwin chose to focus on
those elements of Nature in this theory, instead of focusing on the incredible symbiosis and
cooperation which is also widespread in Nature – and to a greater extent than competition.

Science is a Religion Today: The Insane and Never-Ending Search for the
Smallest Particle

Fast forward to today, and it seems science is a religion like never before. What’s happening
at CERN with the Hadron Collider’s search for ever smaller and smaller particles seems like
materialistic mainstream science desperately trying to justify itself and its outmoded theory,
like a dog forever chasing its tail in vain. Recently in November 2014 Dr. Brian
Whitworth published a paper which contrasted the materialistic and idealistic views, which
he framed as physical realism and quantum realism. When he matched them to data, he found
the quantum realism (simulation) model fit the observations and facts much better. He writes:

“The Higgs boson is the virtual particle created by an invisible field to explain another
virtual particle created by another invisible field to explain an actual effect (neutron decay).
Given dark energy and dark matter, it explains at best 4% of the mass of the universe, but the
standard model needs it, so when after fifty years CERN found a million, million, million,
millionth of a second signal in the possible range, physics was relieved. There is no evidence
this “particle” has any effect on mass at all, but the standard model survives.
By piling fields upon fields, the standard model now has at least 48 point particles, 24 fitted
properties, 5 overlapping invisible fields and 14 virtual particles that pop in and out of
existence on demand, anywhere, anytime. And it isn’t finished yet, as each new effect needs a
new field, e.g. inflation needs an inflaton field. If this approach, founded on physical realism,
is preferred, it isn’t because of its simplicity, as it is hard to imagine anything more
complicated! Chapter 4 suggests that while the fitted calculations work, their interpretation
is a mythology on a scale not seen since Ptolemy’s epicycles.”

Science is a Religion: We are Basically

Blind to The Electromagnetic Spectrum

Materialism places so much stock in what we can apprehend with our 5 senses, especially
sight, since it is the dominant sense for most people. Yet, of what we know exists in the full
electromagnetic spectrum, we can only see a tiny range from approximately 700 nanometers
(abbreviated nm) to 400 nm, between the infrared and ultraviolet rays. If the electromagnetic
spectrum were a reel of film 2500 miles long (stretching from California to Alaska), then the
band of visible light would be around 1 inch! According to my calculations, if these numbers
are correct, that means that we only perceive 0.00000000631313% of what is really there. So
why does mainstream science place so much faith in our 5-sense reality and disregard the
unseen as fantasy or imagination, when we are so blind?

Mainstream Science – Bogged Down by Fraud and Fakery

So far, I have discussed the reasons why mainstream science is ideologically or theoretically
on the wrong track. I haven’t even begun to touch the ways in which science is horribly
misguided and mistaken on a practical level. Sad to say, science has been totally corrupted by
special interests who fund and determine the outcome of much of the research. They can pay
for whatever “scientific result” they want for their agenda, not only because one’s very act of
observation determines one’s reality, but also because they can slant, distort and omit data in
line with their goals. Simply put, a scientist discovering the “wrong” result will be quickly
rejected and defunded.
This fake and fraudulent science, which is not true science at all but rather corporate junk
science which passes under the rubric of science, is all pervasive. See my articles The
Massive Flaw with the Scientific Hierarchy of Evidence, The Top 10 Tricks Used by
Corporate Junk Science and Most Scientific Research of Western Medicine Untrustable &
Fraudulent, Say Insiders and Experts for a fuller discussion of this point. As Marcia Angell,
former editor-in-chief of the esteemed New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), had to say
about the pervasive fraudulent scientific research:

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or
to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines … I take no
pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as
an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”

Happily, there are many true scientists standing outside of the fakery and putting forth
alternative evidence to consider (e.g. with the political manmade global warming agenda).
The truth cannot be hidden forever.

Conclusion: Science is a Religion Which Requires Faith

Mainstream scientists will probably feel aghast to hear it, but the truth is that science is a
religion with its own high priests – they just wear white coats rather than black gowns. It
requires belief (faith) in its theories (doctrine) which can never ultimately be proven
(Evolution, Relativity, Big Bang) because they are full of assumptions and contradictions.
There is always at least one question that can never be answered, and constantly redefining
terms, omitting numbers or inventing new factors becomes, at a certain point, like twisting
facts to suit theories, rather than twisting theories to suit facts, as the fictional character
Sherlock Holmes liked to say.

Terrence McKenna humorously put it like this:

“Modern science is based on the principle: ‘Give us one free miracle, and we’ll explain the
rest.’ The one free miracle is the appearance of all the mass and energy in the universe and
all the laws that govern it in a single instant from nothing.” – Terence McKenna

Materialist science has tried to convince us that everything can be explained with solid atoms,
but as various experiments have proven, only theories which account for consciousness,
energy, non-locality and other phenomena make sense. Particles are probability distributions,
not little hard things. Materialism falls short again and again in describing and predicting our
world. We actually live in a holographic universe – a computer simulation which looks and
feels real but which is composed of stuff which is not solid.

Mainstream materialistic science is a religion – and the time is long overdue to give up the
faith.
About the Author

Makia Freeman is the editor of The Freedom Articles and senior researcher
at ToolsForFreedom.com (FaceBook here), writing on many aspects of truth and freedom,
from exposing aspects of the worldwide conspiracy to suggesting solutions for how humanity
can create a new system of peace and abundance