Sie sind auf Seite 1von 7

ITEMS:

Is
Fashion
Modern
?
Paola Antonelli
and Michelle Millar Fisher

THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART, NEW YORK


WHO’S AFRAID OF FASHION?   — Paola Antonelli

Items: Is Fashion Modern? is the first exhibition on fashion at The Museum of Modern
2
Art since 1944. Although the Museum was established in 1929 for the express purpose
of “encouraging and developing the study of modern arts and the application of such
arts to manufacture and practical life,”1 and indeed has included architecture and design
since its founding, the only fashion item in the collection when I began my career
at MoMA in 1994 was an early-twentieth-century Delphos dress by Mariano Fortuny,
acquired in 1987.2 Ever since, the Museum’s acquisitions of clothing and accessories
have been sporadic: a few garments here and there, injected into wider conversations
on technology (digital production, for instance) or functional typologies (such as the
sports hijab or parkas for the homeless). Today the design collection includes four
dresses, one coat, one shirt, and four head coverings.3 Incremental progress has been
made, but there is still a long way to go. Our collection must encompass fashion if it is
to complete the circle that connects all forms of design—from architecture to textiles,
from manufactured objects to digital artifacts—in the fertile dialogue at the root of the
diverse and open-ended contemporary incarnation of the modern.

Fashion is unquestionably a form of design. As with other types of design, its pitch
is struck in the mediation between form and function, means and goals, automation and
craftsmanship, standardization and customization, universality and self-expression, and
pragmatism and vision. In other words, fashion partakes in all the existential dilemmas
of design, and since its involvement in our lives is so intimate and intrinsic, it is an espe-
cially agile mediator between the universal and the personal, capable of magnifying our
rawest emotions. Like other physical and digital forms of design, it moves on a spectrum
ranging from postindustrial seriality (from ready-to-wear to fast fashion) to precious,
hand-crafted uniqueness (haute couture). Like all design, it exists in the service of others.
1
In most cases, it is conceived by an individual to dress others—sometimes many, many
others—so that they can function in the world, in different arenas, and not only cover
3
but also express themselves. Moreover, like all design, fashion has consequences—
social, political, cultural, and environmental. And the influence works both ways: military
research, for example, has long pioneered new, wearable materials and technologies
that have been incorporated into the clothing of private citizens. Culture wars and
political protests continue to be waged through garments. Today fashion is produced
en masse and distributed on a global scale. An increase in customers with disposable
income and the advent of e-commerce have drastically altered buying behaviors, eliciting
demand for up-to-the-minute choices and the expectation of both affordable pricing
and on-demand luxury. Fast fashion, in particular, is an arena for social, political,
economic, and environmental conflict. The death of more than 1,100 workers in 2013

Left: 2—  Brandon Wen and Dress—Dress Meets Body)


1—  “Pockets” and Laura Zwanziger’s half-scale 3—  Are Clothes Modern?
“Buttons,” from the 1947 plus-size dress form Tolula, exhibition at The Museum
book Bernard Rudofsky designed at Cornell of Modern Art, 1944. View
produced in conjunction University’s 3-D body-scan of the entrance. Unknown
with his exhibition Are lab in 2013. Photograph by photographer
Clothes Modern? (MoMA, the designers. Like the other 4—  Jumpsuit prototype
1944). The caption reads, new designs illustrated in designed by Richard Malone
“Fully clothed man carries this essay, this prototype for Items: Is Fashion Modern?,
4
seventy or more buttons, was presented in the Items 2017. Photograph by the
most of them useless. He has exhibition (corresponding designer
at his disposal two dozen in this case to Comme des
14 15 pockets.” Garçons’s Body Meets
when a garment factory in Dhaka, Bangladesh, collapsed catalyzed public consciousness Alexander McQueen: Savage Beauty at the Met in New York to monographic exhibitions
of how complexly entwined the fashion system is in our social and personal economies. on Madame Grès in Paris, Jean Paul Gaultier in Montreal (the first stop in a long tour),
Fashion is a design field of enormous impact. Still, like other forms of design, it often Chanel in Shanghai, and Dior at the Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts in Moscow,
does not get the wider critical consideration or respect it is due. among others. In an article devoted to the phenomenon, she traced the history of fashion
exhibitions in museums and spoke to curators and critics in an attempt to outline the
When design curators try to explain the importance of their field, often they simply criteria by which such projects are conceived and could be critiqued.6 In the same essay,
point to objects closeby—a purse, the kitchen shelf, a vending machine interface— Menkes concluded that “fashion has developed from being a passion for a few to a
and say, “Design is all around us.” Fashion design is even closer; it is literally all over fascination—and an entertainment—for everybody.” And therein lies another conun-
us—and throughout us, as it turns out, since we use it to project, aspire, express, and drum: most forms of design, but especially fashion design, are too often considered
redesign ourselves, and to size up and judge others. For this reason, a history of modern “lesser” disciplines in the art world (much the way film is), because no matter how
design that excludes fashion hardly seems plausible. So in 1995 I asked the formidable extensive the scholarly literature they engender, they still manage to immediately
first director of MoMA’s Department of Architecture, Philip Johnson, why the Museum connect and inspire—and usually delight—at levels that are accessible by the many
had not given fashion the time of day. Johnson had started his career at MoMA in 1932, as well as by the few.
and in 1995 he was a trustee and the chairman of the Acquisitions Committee of the
Department of Architecture and Design. His exhibitions and books had created the I am embarrassed to admit that at first I felt anxiety about using “fashion” in the title of
official narrative of twentieth-century modernity in these fields, without including this exhibition. In the end, I was encouraged to do so by two great colleagues, MoMA’s
garments. He explained to me that fashion, bound as it was to seasonal rhythms and director, Glenn Lowry, and distinguished design curator Glenn Adamson. Both advised
compulsory stylistic rebirths, was considered ephemeral and thus antithetical to the that no good curatorial strategy ever came from being afraid of the central terms of the
ideals of modernism—timelessness above all. Johnson’s argument was unconvincing, dialogue to which one is hoping to contribute, and so the word fashion stayed and was
coming from a keen observer of the latest trends in architecture and art and a famed embraced (guardedly, then with abandon) and interrogated—in the title itself, and
curator who had coined several new movements “of the moment,” Deconstructivism throughout the essays, exhibition wall texts, and public programs associated with this
being only the most recent.4 Interestingly, he never mentioned the Museum’s one project. Recently I was able to reflect upon this process of weaving fashion into MoMA’s
previous foray into fashion—Are Clothes Modern?, a 1944 exhibition by the architect interdisciplinary museum context as part of a discussion hosted by The Brooklyn Rail,
and curator Bernard Rudofsky. Had MoMA been afraid of fashion? Although Rudofsky’s which asked various contributors—including esteemed fashion curator Valerie Steele
exhibition might seem to suggest the contrary, it was an outlier—just as Rudofsky was. and historian Rhonda Garelick—to consider fashion’s relationship to fine art.7 It is a
Two decades later, in 1964, he returned to the Museum and cemented his position project that Rudofsky kick-started with his 1944 exhibition, in which he attempted to
as MoMA’s (and Johnson’s) resident thorn-in-the-side with the exhibition Architecture (re)locate fashion within wider discourses of art, society, and culture—his traditionalist
Without Architects: A Short Introduction to Non-Pedigreed Architecture, which, with its paragon of dignity being not design (as it is here), but art. With the dispassionate gaze
earnest celebration of vernacular constructions, is considered to be neither the first nor of an anthropologist, he explored individual and collective relationships with mid-century
the last, but definitely one of the sharpest nails in the coffin of modernist architecture. clothing in the waning moments of World War II, when conventions were being ques-
tioned but old attitudes still prevailed: women continued to pour their bodies into
What was—and is—the issue with fashion? Perceived frivolity? Codependency—the uncompromising silhouettes, and menswear still demanded superfluous pockets, buttons,
idea that we always dress for others, a fluid form of relational aesthetics that would cuffs, and collars.8 “It will not be a style or fashion show; it will not display costumes;
be anathema in modernist design? Its association with the feminine and consequent it will not offer specific dress reforms,” reads Are Clothes Modern?’s 1944 press release.
dismissal by the largely patriarchal powers that be in museums, in academia, and pretty “The purpose of the exhibition is to bring about an entirely new and fresh approach to
much everywhere else? Its slow rate of absorption by major fine arts institutions, even the subject of clothes.”9 Rudofsky’s provocative exhibition was a prompt for the public
while artists—from Louise Bourgeois and Joseph Beuys to Andrea Zittel and Yinka of its day to reconsider their relationship with the clothes they wore, and with the
Shonibare—have recognized and deployed clothing’s considerable power of expression? designers and systems that produced those clothes.
Or perhaps its immediate digestibility by the popular market and its excessive commer-
cialism, which contribute to the taint of “vulgarity” often cited to support an artificial Further along in the press release, Rudofsky railed against the peripheral role that
separation between design and the fine arts (which are famously devoid of commercial fashion had been given in the allied scholarship of the visual arts and culture, lamenting:
value)? Generally speaking, art museums have treated fashion with various measures
of ambivalence and longing, trying to absorb it into the realm of art while at the same It is strange that dress has been generally denied the status of art, when it is actually
time keeping their distance—sometimes marking this separation with the term “cos- a most happy summation of aesthetic, philosophic and psychological components. . . .
tume,” perhaps to lift clothing design above the populist fray and treat it as an applied [Its] intimate relation to the very source and standard of all aesthetic evaluations,
art, keeping it in the same limbo reserved for glass arts and ceramics. That said, some the human body, should make it the supreme achievement among the arts.
institutions have adopted fashion with enthusiasm, the best-known example being the
Metropolitan Museum of Art’s venerated Costume Institute, inaugurated in 1946.5 Little seems to have changed in the past seven decades. In an article on the musician
In 2011, Suzy Menkes, then the fashion editor of the International Herald Tribune, took and fashion muse Lady Gaga in March 2016, New York Times fashion critic Vanessa
notice of a slew of fashion exhibitions happening around the world—from the blockbuster 16 17 Friedman wrote, “For while fashion may be famous for its elitism, it has long been seen,
and often sees itself, as the stepchild of the art world; the less worthy creative form.
We all have our complexes.”10 Like many fields of creative endeavor, fashion—as a place
of research and a professional landscape—still needs validation. At the same time,
however, fashion is now being recognized by curators, writers, and researchers outside
its very core—as well as by designers and by the people who Instagram it, dream
of it, borrow it, buy it, wear it, and monetize it—as the gold mine it has always been:
an intersectional, global, cultural, social, and political phenomenon.

This exhibition’s subtitle, Is Fashion Modern?, reprises the question that titled Rudofsky’s
first show, while Items indicates an object-centered, design-led investigation. Rudofsky’s
broad approach provided a springboard from which to consider the ways in which
fashion items are designed, manufactured, distributed, and worn today. Here “modern”
still maintains many of the positive nuances that have made it a core tenet of MoMA’s
mission since 1929, indicating a constructive attitude toward the future based on the
unity of the arts, working together on society’s current needs and priorities, and privileg-
ing a departure from tradition that is not based on rejection of the past but rather
on respect and reinvention. Yet the question that Rudofsky posed in 1944 still bears
repeating in 2017 precisely because of the disconnect between what we wear and who
we are, between the ways in which clothing is made and the ways in which it might
5 6 be made. Every single item in the exhibition and in this book represents a key to the
complexities of such a system, a lens with which to magnify its inner workings and
7 understand its impact.

Most fashion exhibitions in art museums follow straightforward and traditional modes
of art-historical investigation, privileging either the personality of a creator or focusing
on moments in history or regions of the world. They produce important scholarship,
but often curators sweep process and context—fashion’s more mundane, contaminated,
gloriously designlike sides—under a dazzlingly beautiful carpet. I have learned important
lessons from wholly predictable exhibitions that fit this description, but there are
exceptions that pierced the veil of genius or truly addressed and explained a particular
ecosystem of fashion, and are thus profoundly memorable. One was Juste des vêtements
(Just Some Garments), an exhibition on the work of Japanese designer Yohji Yamamoto
curated by Pamela Golbin at the Musée de la Mode et du Textile in Paris in 2005, for
which the designer’s Tokyo atelier was reconstructed in the galleries on rue de Rivoli
to show how fashion really/mythologically happens.11 Another is the 1998 exhibition on
the great protagonist of American fashion, visionary designer Claire McCardell, at
The Museum at FIT (Fashion Institute of Technology) in New York.12 When it comes to
contextualization, a striking example was the 2015 show in Stockholm Utopian Bodies,
by curatorial duo Sofia Hedman and Serge Martynov, which contemplated fashion

Left: 8—  Development sketches


5—  Development sketches for the tights prototype
for a new guayabera concept designed by Lucy Jones for
designed by Ryohei Items: Is Fashion Modern?,
Kawanishi for Items: Is 2017
Fashion Modern?, 2017
6, 7—  Materials testing for
the biker jacket prototype
designed by Asher Levine for
8
Items: Is Fashion Modern?,
2017. Photograph by the
designer
18 19
in relationship to different urgent and timely issues—such as sustainability, gender, and were helped by a diverse, international advisory committee (see p. 282) and by the
memory—within an arresting installation design.13 Although monographic shows exist impressive roster of speakers who participated in a two-day colloquium at the Museum
also in design, MoMA curators have traditionally privileged thematic exhibitions, in in May 2016 14; our efforts were further buttressed by research, interviews, and extensive
which objects become portals to a deeper understanding of the world in all its political, travels—to India and Bangladesh, Nigeria and South Africa, and many other places in
technological, sociological, cultural, economic, philosophical—in other words, in all its Asia, Europe, and the US. Finally, for about a third of the pieces, when advancements
systemic—complexity, without sacrificing aesthetic consideration. Clothes are especially in technology, social dynamics, visual culture, or political awareness warranted it, we
profound and charged examples of design that allow us to explore these knotty realms. complemented the item with a newly commissioned design—a prototype to jump-start
a new life cycle for the garment with pioneering materials, more sustainable approaches,
Items was born around 2011, initially emerging as a list of “garments that changed the or novel design techniques. (The preparatory drawings for some of these commissions
world,” and it encompassed clothes and accessories that have had a profound impact illustrate this essay.)
during the time range covered by MoMA’s collection. It was originally an exploration
of potential acquisitions that seemed necessary to tell a more accurate history of modern The exhibition is laid out so as to provide both deliberate and serendipitous adjacencies.
design. This volume and the related exhibition explore a small slice of such canonical From an area devoted to mutating ideas of the body and silhouette, spanning issues of
and noncanonical garments from all over the world through the nexus of their complex size, image, and gender—this space presents, among many other items, the little black
and dynamic production, allowing readers and audiences to understand the larger dress, the Wonderbra, the sari, and Rudi Gernreich’s Unisex Project—the exhibition
implications of—and their own participation in—the systems that govern and produce segues into a zone devoted to new technologies and visions of the future, bringing
this design field. The list is hardly exhaustive, either in terms of cultural and geographic experiments such as Issey Miyake’s A-POC (A Piece of Cloth) and Pierre Cardin’s
reach or in number (arbitrarily, 111 objects, a ceiling that purposely provokes others into Cosmoscorps collection into conversation with Gore-Tex, sunscreen, and the Moon
highlighting omissions and proposing additions). The Items curatorial team has chosen Boot. The fascinating relationship between emancipation, modesty, introversion,
to celebrate our center of gravity, New York, by using the city as an observatory, albeit and rebellion—concepts that paradoxically share many common traits, in fashion and
one equipped with a particularly powerful and inquisitive telescope. New York’s diversity beyond—is introduced by the hoodie and the turtleneck, and this portion of the
and density, and its inhabitants’ penchant for intense conversations—for instance, about show includes items as diverse as leather pants, the cheongsam, the slip dress, the
contamination or appropriation—have taught us that while you cannot write somebody bikini, the hijab, and kente cloth, all connected by a thread of alternately muted or
else’s story or compile somebody else’s list, it does not take much to trigger a vivacious roaring subversion. Next comes a section devoted to items whose foremost function
and productive response. Our list of 111 items is, thus, like any abbreviated compilation, is to deliver a message, sometimes explicit (a graphic T-shirt, a tattoo, a particular use
particular, filled with this team’s soul and personalities, and also inductive, crafted of a bandanna) and other times implicit (a Birkin bag or a diamond engagement ring).
to distill a common experience and inspire a reaction. The goal of the exhibition is to Sports—often a source not only of technological but also of stylistic innovation and the
stimulate curiosity and focus attention so that everyone who passes through it might basis of contemporary casual wear and street wear—inspired a section charting the
look at fashion in a different way, with more awareness, agency, and respect. Throughout myriad ways in which fashion and athleticism have met over the past century, whether
the gestation of this project, the public—from third graders to seasoned scholars—felt in the form of sports jerseys and other street-wear staples like the polo shirt and the
inspired to suggest, comment on, approve, decry, or amend both the choice of items Converse All-Star, or revered high-fashion collaborations such as Yamamoto’s Y-3.
and the way each was represented. A section dedicated to everyday uniforms features humble masterpieces such as the
Breton shirt and Levi’s 501s, professional attire such as the pencil skirt and loafers, and
In the exhibition and in this catalogue, garments created for the benefit of many (such the ubiquitous, multipurpose Dutch wax textiles—indispensable staples that are all but
as the white T-shirt or the dashiki) coexist with rarefied fashion episodes for the delight invisible, so entrenched are they in our habits and behaviors. The exhibition concludes
of a few (Martin Margiela’s Tabi footwear series, for instance, or Yves Saint Laurent’s Le with a study of power—hard and soft—embodied by, among other garments and
Smoking). What they have in common is their influence on the world, whether direct and accessories, a selection of men’s suits, Donna Karan’s Seven Easy Pieces, the stiletto
immediate, as evidenced by millions of purchases, or mediated and metabolized at first heel, and the pearl necklace. In order to make our inquiry’s shift to a global scale clearer,
by institutional and financial elites. Thanks to the cross-pollination made possible by we commissioned information designer Giorgia Lupi to create a mural that places the
physical and cultural migrations, rampant appropriation, and the disseminating power 111 items within larger systems—for instance, the United Nations’ sustainability protocol,
of media both old and new, nowhere do high and low engage in so productive a conver- adapted for the future of fashion.
sation as in fashion.
Each of the items in the exhibition engages many intersectional themes and could
In the Museum galleries, we examine these items in three tiers: archetype, stereotype, therefore be positioned usefully in any number of constellations. This catalogue, however,
and prototype. Presented first in the incarnation that made it significant in the last one takes a different tack, presenting the material alphabetically, for ease of reference.
hundred (or so) years—the stereotype—each item is then accompanied by contextual A short essay on each of the 111 items in the exhibition appears in the order suggested
material that traces its origins back to historical archetypes. Our method for defining by the first letter of its name, though we have in some cases decided to take certain
a design’s stereotype was necessarily subjective but drew on the collective conscious- license—for example, opening the sequence with 501s, omitting their maker’s well-known
ness: when you close your eyes and think of a sari, or a pair of chinos, or a pearl necklace, name in order for them to lead the pack as harbingers of modernity, fashion, and design’s
what do you see? That is the item’s stereotype. In our constructive stereotyping, we 20 21 interdependency. We have relied on primary sources from the past century, including
material-culture references such as Vogue, Harper’s Bazaar, and the New York Times,
to describe particular cultural moments, and have, of course, drawn heavily on available
scholarship, archival materials, and interviews. Novel visual interpretations of the items
in the show were solicited from five photographers: Omar Victor Diop, Bobby Doherty,
Catherine Losing (in collaboration with stylist Anna Lomax), Monika Mogi, and Kristin-Lee
Moolman (with longtime collaborator Ibrahim Kamara), and those stellar images are
among the many hundreds included here.

In this project, high fashion lives comfortably alongside the white T-shirt and jeans and
other familiar items whose histories we are not so well-acquainted with (perhaps the
true definition of a “humble masterpiece”).15 Equally, in a protomodern approach that
emphasizes the interrelationship and continuity between all forms of culture, fashion
items of all sorts can exist alongside the architectural models, chairs, posters, and video
games that constitute this Museum’s design history. Making these connections has
always been part of MoMA’s mission—at least in the Department of Architecture and 10
Design, where we get to place highly diverse objects side by side in considered juxta-
positions that allow our audiences to bring their own experiences to bear, too. It is plain
that what we wear informs our everyday experience of self and society. The foundational
clothing designs included here allow us to talk rightfully about fashion as a salient area
of design—one that should not and cannot be ignored. I believe that the writers, curators,
students, and members of the general public who recognize and embrace this show’s
approach can help locate a new center of gravity for the field of fashion and generate
their own provocative questions for further exhibitions, books, public discussions, and
personal reflections—at least some of which, I trust, will happen at MoMA. No modern
design history is complete without fashion.
9

Right: 12—  Development sketches


9, 10—  Breton sweater for the harem pants
prototype designed by prototype designed by
Unmade for Items: Is Fashion Miguel Mesa Posada for
Modern?, 2017. Photograph Items: Is Fashion Modern?,
by Luke Bennett 2017
11—  Still from a video
produced in conjunction
11 12
with the little black dress
prototype designed by Pia
Interlandi for Items: Is
Fashion Modern?, 2017 22 23
PHOTOGRAPH CREDITS Guy Marineau/Condé Nast via Getty Images. rights of Salvador Dalí reserved. Fundació Gala- Salvador worlds end blog, http://worldsendshop.co.uk/. Woolen Mills, Inc. All rights reserved. This image may Stevenson and Eva Tkaczuk. © 2017 Bata Shoe Museum,
5. © Gert-weigelt.de. Breton Shirt 2. Courtesy @ Saint Dalí, Figueres, 2017. 3. Photo Keystone/Getty Images/ 3. Courtesy Chronicle/Alamy Stock Photo. 4. Vivienne not be reproduced without express permission from Toronto, Canada. 2. © The Helmut Newton Estate/
James. 3. Public domain via Wikimedia Commons. Stringer. 4. Photo Ana Sanz. Courtesy Las Pacas Westwood/1993/Fall Winter. Photo Niall Mclnerney. © Pendleton Woolen Mills, Inc. Platform Shoe 1. © Keisuke Maconochie Photography. Suit 1. Photo Ash Reynolds.
In reproducing the images contained in this publication, 4. © Stephen Shore. courtesy 303 Gallery, New York. Espadrilles, www.laspacas.com. Fanny Pack 1. Courtesy Bloomsbury Fashion Archive. Kippah 1. New York Public Katano. Courtesy The J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Courtesy Thom Browne. 2. © 2017 Museum Associates/
the Museum obtained the permission of the rights 5. © Pierre et Gilles: À nous deux la mode, Jean Paul Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, Library Digital Collection. 2. Courtesy MayaWorks. Angeles. Hiroshi Hamaya, Blind Musicians, Niigata LACMA. Licensed by Art Resource, NY. 3. Courtesy Eric
holders whenever possible. If the Museum could not Gaultier, 1989. Briefs 1. Courtesy Jockey International, Edward S. Curtis Collection [LC-USZ62-46973]. 3. Courtesy Suzy Rosenstein. 4, 6. Courtesy MoMA. Prefecture, 1956, Gelatin silver print, 30.1 x 20 cm. T. White. 4. © Daniele Tamagni. 5. © 1985 Universal
locate the rights holders, notwithstanding good-faith Inc. 2. Photo Bruce Weber. Courtesy PVH Corp. 2. © Inez Van Lamsweerde and Vinoodh Matadin/Trunk Photo John Wronn. 5. Courtesy Needlepoint by Rachael 2. Photo Steve Eichner/Getty Images. 3. © Meryl Meisler Television Enterprises, Inc. Courtesy Universal Studios
efforts, it requests that any contact information Archives/Calvin Klein. Model Tom Hintnaus. Archive. 3. Public domain via Wikimedia Commons/ Brown in Atlanta. 7. Courtesy Kids Kippot. 8. Courtesy 1978. 4. Courtesy Museo Stibbert, Florence, Italy. Licensing LLC. 6. Courtesy War Archive/Alamy Stock
concerning such rights holders be forwarded so that 3, 4. Courtesy Jockey International, Inc. Bucket Hat Andrew Smart/Lane Fine Art. 4. Courtesy Travis Kiger. geardiary.com. 9. Courtesy MayaWorks. Lapel Pin 5. Photo Josiah Kamau/BuzzFoto via Getty Images. Polo Photo. 7. © Paramount Pictures Corp. All rights reserved.
they may be contacted for future editions. 1. Image by Chris Saunders; courtesy Chris Saunders & Fitbit 1. Courtesy J. Rogers, Northwestern University. 1. Courtesy REUTERS/Eddie Keogh. 2. Photo Win Shirt 1. Getty Images via Fred Perry. Courtesy Damon Courtesy Paramount Pictures. Sunscreen 1. Photo Hong
Impilo Mapantsula. 2. Public domain via Wikimedia 2. Courtesy Kathryn Bennett. Fleece 1. Courtesy Tom McNamee/Getty Images/Staff. 3. Photo Jim Smeal/ Albarn and Fred Perry. 2. From “Bury Me With The Lo Wu/Getty Images. 2. Used under license by Bayer®.
501s 1. Courtesy Levi Strauss & Co. 2, 3. Courtesy Levi Commons/Nesnad. 3. Licensed by Warner Bros. Frost/Aurora Photos. 2. Courtesy Patagonia/Rick Wirelmage via Getty Images. 4. Courtesy Louvre, Paris, On,” by Thirstin Howl the 3rd and Tom Gould. Published 3. Aaron Black via Getty Images. Surgical Mask
Strauss & Co. Archives (San Francisco). 4. Courtesy Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved. 4. Courtesy Ridgeway. Flip-Flop 1. Photo Mai/Mai/The LIFE Images France/Bridgeman Images. 5. Photo Keystone/Getty by Victory Editions, 2016. 3. Courtesy Ann Kirsten 1. Courtesy National Archives, photo no. 165-WW-269B-
Dangberg Home Ranch Historic Park. A-POC Queen i-am-chen. 5. Creative Commons via Flickr/Government Collection/Getty Images. 2. Courtesy www.exoticindia. Images/Stringer. Le Smoking 1. Photo Alain Nogues/ Kennis. 4. Photo George Rinhart/Corbis via Getty 25. 2. KIRA. Courtesy TokyoFashion.com. 3. Underwood
1. A POC Queen, 1998 (1999 Spring/Summer Issey Press Office. Burkini 1. Courtesy Narelle Autio and Hugo com. 3. © 2017 Bata Shoe Museum, Toronto, Canada. Sygma/Sygma via Getty Images. 2. Photo Syndication Images. Premaman 1. Bettmann via Getty Images. Archives/Getty Images. 4. Courtesy REUTERS/Damir
Mikaye Collection). Photo Hiroshi Iwasaki. 2. Courtesy Michell Gallery, Australia. 2. Aheda Zanetti/Ahiida Pty Photo Hal Roth. Fur Coat 2. © Museumslandschaft International/Getty Images/Staff. 3. © The Helmut 3. Courtesy Philippe McLean. Red Lipstick 1. Photo Sagolj Swatch 1. Courtesy REUTERS/Will Burgess.
Holly McQuillan. 3. A POC Le Feu 1999 Spring Summer Ltd. Caftan 1. Courtesy Henry Clarke/Vogue. © Condé Hessen Kassel/Bridgeman Images. 3. Courtesy EBONY Newton Estate/Maconochie Photography. Leather Richard Avedon. © The Richard Avedon Foundation. 2. GZ010–Original Jelly Fish, Swatch Ltd. Tabi Boot.
Issey Mikaye Paris Collection. Photo Yasuaki Yoshinaga. Nast. 2. Photo Pascal Le Segretain/Getty Images/Staff. Media Operations, LLC. All rights reserved. 4. People for Pants 1. Courtesy International Mr. Leather Inc. Courtesy Revlon. 2. Albert Sanchez for M·A·C 2. Photo Larry French/Getty Images for Staff USA/
4. Courtesy Biblioteca Nacional de España, Madrid, 3. Photo DeAgostini/Getty Images/DEA/G. DAGLI ORTI. the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), www.peta.org. 2. © Rolling Stone LLC 2017. All rights reserved. Used Cosmetics. Courtesy RuCo, Inc. fso RuPaul. Rolex Stringer. 3. Photo Anders Edstrom. Courtesy Maison
Invent/59. Adidas Superstar 1. Courtesy Jamel Shabazz. 4. Courtesy Anne Mullier. Capri Pants 1. Courtesy John Gore-Tex 1. © National Museum of Natural History. by permission. 3. Photo Michael Ochs Archives/Getty 2. © Jack Forster, Editor-in-Chief of HODINKEE, Martin Margiela. Tattoo 2. Creative Commons via Flickr/
2. © 1970 NBAE. Photo Robert Lewis/NBAE via Getty Rawlings/Vogue. © Condé Nast. 2. Courtesy Sonja de Courtesy (Catalogue No. E383185) Department of Images/Handout. 4. Courtesy Jean-Baptiste Mondino. hodinkee.com. Safari Suit 1. Photo Osa & Martin ANBerlin. 3. Courtesy Don. 4. Courtesy Roxx 2Spirit.
Images. 3. © 2017 Bata Shoe Museum, Toronto, Canada. Lennart. 3. ©1962 Calvada Productions. All rights Anthropology, Smithsonian Institution. 2, 3. Courtesy Photo via Condé Nast France. Leotard 1. © Victoria and Johnson Safari Mus./Getty Images. 3. Courtesy Oenone 5. Courtesy Ania Blazejewska. Teva Sandal
Photo Suzanne Petersen. 4. Photo Ebet Roberts/ reserved. Courtesy Calvada Productions and Paul W.L. Gore & Associates Archives. Graphic T-Shirt Albert Museum, London. 2. Photo Tim Clayton/Corbis Acheson. 4. Courtesy Ozwald Boateng. 5. Photo John 1. Photo Norman Kent. 2, 3. TEVA® is a registered
Redferns via Getty Images. Air Force 1 1. Courtesy Brownstein Productions. Cartier Love Bracelet 1. Courtesy Liza Cowan. 2. Photo Diana Davies, Ralph via Getty Images. 3. Courtesy Cooper Hewitt, Minihan/Evening Standard/Getty Images. Safety Pin trademark of Deckers Outdoor Corporation. Tie 1. Public
Robert McCullough, the Rucker Pro Legends. 1. Courtesy Gary Bernstein. 2. Courtesy Schell Rinzler Folklife Archives and Collections. 3. Photo Smithsonian Design Museum/Art Resource, NY. 1. Courtesy Nick Knight. 2. Photo Lisa Larsen/The LIFE domain/US Patent. 2. Courtesy Esquire, Hearst
3. Courtesy NIKE 4. Courtesy Bobbito Garcia archives, Collection, Graz, Austria. Chanel No. 5 1. Courtesy George Silk/Time & Life Pictures/Getty Images. 4. Photo 4. © Philippe Halsman Archive. Little Black Dress Images Collection/Getty Images. 3. Courtesy Trinity Communications, Inc. 3. Photo David Lees/The LIFE
from the upcoming film Rock Rubber 45s. Aran Sweater Chanel. Photo François Kollar @ Ministère de la Culture, Jordan Mansfield/Getty Images/Stringer. 5. Courtesy 1. © Condé Nast. Courtesy Mainbocher/Vogue. Mirror/Mirrorpix/Alamy Stock Photo. 4. Photo Dave Picture Collection/Getty Images. 4. Courtesy Bonhams.
1–3 © National Museum of Ireland. 5. Courtesy Warner Médiathèque du Patrimoine, Dist. RMN, France. Frank Stefanko. 6. Courtesy PA Images/Alamy Stock 2. Courtesy Firstview. 3. Photo Steve Marsel Studio. Benett/Hulton Archive/Getty Images. 5. Photo by Clive 5. Danny Lehman via Getty Images. Tights 1. Skin
Bros. Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved. 6. © Cheongsam 1. © USA Films. Courtesy USA Films/ Photo. 7. Courtesy Chromix Imaging/Alamy Stock Photo. Courtesy Nervous System. 4. © Thierry Mugler, 2017. Arrowsmith. Courtesy Zandra Rhodes “Conceptual Chic Guardian, 2006. Art direction and © SOMADESIGN.
National Museum of Ireland. Aviator Sunglasses Photofest. 2. © Paramount Pictures Corp. All rights Guayabera 1. Photo Central Press/Getty Images. Courtesy Indianapolis Museum of Art/Lucille Stewart Collection” 1978. Salwar Kameez 1. The Times of India 2. Courtesy PA Images/Alamy Stock Photo. 3. Photo
1. Courtesy MoMA/Gift of Walter Randel. 2. Courtesy reserved. Courtesy Paramount Pictures. 3. Photo John 2. Courtesy EFE. 3. Courtesy Robert Harding/Alamy Endowed Art Fund. 5. © The Museum at FIT. Loafer Group. © BCCL. All rights reserved. 2. Photo A. R. Tanner/Getty Images/Stringer. 4. Courtesy Glen
Universal Studios Licensing LLC. © 1998 Universal City Kobal Foundation/Getty Images. 5. Courtesy Jenny Stock Photo. 4. Bettmann via Getty Images. Harem 1. Photo Paul Drinkwater/NBC/NBCU Photo Bank via Catwalking/Getty Images. 3. Courtesy Imran Ahmed/ Raven, Inc. Tracksuit 1. Photo still from Longstreet–
Studios, Inc. All rights not specifically granted by Lewis. Chinos 1. Matthew Chattle/Alamy Stock Photo. Pants 1. Courtesy Eugene Adebari/Shutterstock. Getty Images. 3. Photo Dave Buresh/The Denver Post Alamy Stock Photo. 4. Photo Tim Graham/Getty Images. Courtesy CBS Television Studios. 2. Courtesy
Universal herein are reserved. 3. Photo James Garrett/ 2. Frank Scherschel via Getty Images from The LIFE 2. Courtesy Barbara Eden as Jeannie. 3. Library of via Getty Images. 4. Holiday magazine. 5. Photo Janette Sari 1. Courtesy Uri Baitner Photography, 2017. 2. Photo Photofusion Picture Library/Alamy Stock Photo.
NY Daily News Archive via Getty Images. 4. Photo Carl Picture Collection. 3. Courtesy Levi Strauss & Co. Congress, Prints & Photographs Division Beckman/Getty Images. Manicure 1. © Condé Nast. Giancarlo Botti/Gamma-Rapho via Getty Images. 3. Courtesy Edward Herdwick/Alamy Stock Photo.
Mydans/The LIFE Picture Collection/Getty Images. Archives (San Francisco). 4. Courtesy Keagan Kingsley [LC-USZ62-970]. 4. Photo Fine Art Images/Heritage Courtesy Gene Laurents/Glamour. 2. Courtesy The 3. Courtesy Paola Antonelli. 4, 5. © Border & Fall. 4. Photo Getty Images/Staff. 5. Photo Jacob Hägg @
Backpack 1. Courtesy National Archives Photo No. Carlin of Gold Creatures. Clog 1. Courtesy Sven Original Images/Getty Images. 5. Photo Apic/Getty Images. Metropolitan Museum of Art, Gilman Collection, 6. Photo STRDEL/AFP/GettyImages/Stringer. Seven oyyyster for Brashy Studios @brashystudios. Model Alex
111-SC-10900. 2. Courtesy JanSport. 3. Courtesy Hans Clogs/svensclogs.com. 2. Photo Bengt H. Malmqvist. © Head Wrap 1. Courtesy The Historic New Orleans Museum Purchase, 2005. 4. Photo Tony Duffy/Allsport Easy Pieces 1, 2. © Benoit Malphettes. 3. Courtesy Boldea (HMMLA). Trench Coat 1. Photo Daily Mirror/
Feurer. Photo via Condé Nast. 4. Courtesy National Premium Rockshot. Converse All Star 1. Courtesy Paul Collections, acquisition made possible by the Diana via Getty Images/Staff. Mao Jacket 1. Photo Sovfoto/ Sandra Garratt. Photo Les Hall. 4. Photo Pierre Sherman. Mirrorpix/Mirrorpix via Getty Images. 2. Licensed by
Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian Institution [Lt Neumann. 2. Photo Ebet Roberts/Redferns via Getty Helis Henry Art Fund of the Helis Foundation in Memory UIG via Getty Images. 2. Bettman via Getty Images. Courtesy Donna Karan New York. Shawl 1. Photo Asaf Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved.
82-2(82-2_02)]. Balaclava 1. PA Photos Limited. Images. 3. Courtesy Converse. 4. Courtesy Seattle of Charles A Snyder, 2010.0306. 2. © Condé Nast. Carlos 3. Photo Tseng Kwong Chi. © 1979 Muna Tseng Dance Ali. Courtesy Kashmir Loom. 2. Courtesy Michelle Millar Photo via AF archive/Alamy Stock Photo. 3. The LIFE
3. Courtesy TASS/Mitya Aleshkovsky. Ballet Flat Municipal Archives, 64042. Coppola 1. Photo Amy Marjob/Vogue. 3. Courtesy Estevan Oriol. 4. Courtesy B Projects, Inc. New York. www.tsengkwongchi.com. Fisher. 3. © RMN-Grand Palais /Art Resource NY. Photo Picture Collection/Getty Images. 4. Melodie Jeng via
1. Courtesy Fashion Institute of Technology | SUNY, Sussman/Getty Images for Moet Hennessy USA. Christopher/Alamy Stock Photo. 5. Cultura RM 4. Courtesy Sophie Bassouls. Miniskirt 1. Courtesy Thierry Ollivier. 4. © 2017 Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Getty Images. Turtleneck 1. Photo Hugo Maertens.
Gladys Marcus Library Special Collections and College 2. Apparel Arts. 3. Photo Hulton Archive/Getty Images/ Exclusive/Laura Arsie via Getty Images. Headphones Carey Winfrey. 2. © Paramount Pictures Corp. Courtesy From the Hayden Collection-Charles Henry Hayden Courtesy Museum of Fine Arts Ghent © www.lukasweb.
Archives. 2. Courtesy Photofest. 3. John Rawlings/ Stringer. 4. © Ferdinando Scianna/Magnum Photos. 1. Photo Dick Lewis/NY Daily News Archive via Getty Paramount Pictures. All rights reserved. 3. Photo Kirn Fund. Shift Dress 1. Photo Slim Aarons/Hulton Archive/ be–Art in Flanders vzw. 2. © Astorina SrL. Courtesy
Vogue. © Condé Nast. 4. Courtesy Christian Louboutin. Dashiki 1. Courtesy Howard Davis/New Breed. Images. 2. Photo Anna Zieminski/AFP/Getty Images/ Vintage Stock/Corbis via Getty Images. 4. Bettmann via Getty Images/Stringer. 2. Photo Chris Moore at Diabolik.Evakant. 3. Bettmann via Getty Images.
5. From the collection of Julie Eilber. All rights reserved. 2. Courtesy Michelle Millar Fisher. 3. Photo Kevin Staff. 3. Photo Ronald Martinez/Getty Images/Staff. Getty Images. Monogram 1. © Kevin Tachman. Courtesy catwalking.com. Courtesy Hussein Chalayan. 4. Creative Commons via Flickr/CopperKettle. 5. Photo
Bandanna 1. Courtesy PF-(bygone1)/Alamy Stock Photo. Winter/Getty Images/Staff. 4. Photo Yale Joel/The LIFE Hijab 1. Courtesy Hana Tajima and UNIQLO. 2. Photo Gucci. 2. Courtesy DapperDanOfHarlem.com. 3. Photo 3. © Condé Nast. Guy Marineau/Vogue. 4. Courtesy Norman Seeff. Unisex Project 1. © The Estate of Patricia
2. Courtesy Michael Benabib. 3. © New-York Historical Picture Collection/Getty Images. 5. Courtesy Kyemah Tom Pennington/Getty Images/Staff. 3. Creative Michael Schwartz/Contour Style via Getty Images. Archivio Alfa Castaldi, Milan. Shirtdress 1. Library Faure. 2. Courtesy The Rational Dress Society.
Society. Baseball Cap 1. Photo Rose Hartman/Getty McEntyre and Jalese Ayana. Diamond Engagement Commons via Wikimedia Commons/Orrling. 4. Photo Moon Boot 1. Photo Mark Avino. Courtesy Smithsonian of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division, 3. Courtesy the ACLU Foundation of Southern
Images. 2. Courtesy Library of Congress, General Ring 1. Courtesy Philipp Mohr/Tobias Wong. 2. © 2017 Peter Turnley/Corbis/VCG via Getty Images. 5. Photo National Air and Space Museum (NASM 2008-12210). Miscellaneous Items on High Demand [LC-DIG- California/Rudi Gernreich GmbH, Swiss branch Lucerne.
Collections. 3. Courtesy Provincial Archives of Alberta, Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, by permission of Frazer Harrison/Getty Images for New York Fashion 2. © 1972 Paul McCartney. Photo Linda McCartney. All ppmsca-09489]. 2. Irving Penn for Vogue, February 1948. White T-Shirt 1. Naval History and Heritage Command,
ABR796. Beret 1. © 2017 Stephen Shames/Polaris. Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana. All rights reserved. Week: The Shows/Staff. Hoodie 1. Courtesy Allison rights reserved. 3. Photographer Tobias Lundkvist. © Condé Nast. 3. Bob Stone/Vogue. © Condé Nast. Silk NH 84663. 2. Courtesy Jockey International, Inc.
Courtesy Steven Kasher Gallery. 2. Courtesy Anayvette 3. Courtesy Elgin-Columbia Diamond Division. Diamond Joyce/Getty Images. 2. Courtesy Daniele Oberrauch/ Oxford-Cloth Button-Down Shirt 1. Courtesy Wofford Scarf 1. Courtesy Slow Factory. 2. Courtesy Hainan 3. David Gilkey/NPR. 4. Mondadori Portfolio via Getty
Martinez (Cofounder of Radical Monarchs). 3. Courtesy Stud 1. © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2017. Courtesy IMAXTREE.com. 3. © 2006 Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer College. 2. Courtesy Ann Demeulemeester. Photo Airlines. 3. Photo Kasia Wandycz/Paris Match via Getty Images. Wonderbra 1. Photo Ellen von Unwerth/Trunk
Tony Avelar/Epa/Shutterstock. 4. Photo Joseph Reuters/Marcos Brindicci. 2. Royal Collection Trust. Pictures Inc. and Revolution Studios Distribution Marleen Daniels marleendaniels.com. 3. © Condé Nast. Images. 4. Courtesy Avalon. Slip Dress 1. Photo Archive. Courtesy Ellen von Unwerth, Hanesbrands,
Scherschel/The LIFE Picture Collection/Getty Images. 3. Courtesy Stewart Cook/REX/Shutterstock. Company, LLC. All rights reserved. Courtesy MGM Courtesy John Rawlings/Vogue. 4. Bettmann via Getty Ke.Mazur/Wirelmage via Getty Images. 2. Chris von TBWA, Eva Herzigova. 2. Public domain/US Patent.
6. Courtesy Creative Commons. Biker Jacket 1. Photo Door-Knocker Earrings 1. Courtesy Amanda López. Media Licensing and Sylvester Stallone. 4. Courtesy Images. Panama Hat 1. Courtesy National Archives and Wangenheim/Vogue. © Condé Nast. 3. Courtesy 3. Courtesy Maison Alice Cadolle. Wrap Dress 2. Freer
Kevin Winter/Getty Images. 2. Courtesy Michael Martin. 2. Courtesy Eugene Adebari/REX/Shutterstock. Hanesbrands, Inc. Jumpsuit 1. Photo Richard Corkery/ Records Administration, 185-G-15-1425. 2. Finaest.com. Richard Young/Rex/Shutterstock. 4. Dan Lecca/Vogue. Gallery of Art and Arthur M. Sackler Gallery:
3. Courtesy Schott NYC. 4. Courtesy Robert Crowe. 3. Courtesy Craig Blankenhorn/HBO. Down Jacket NY Daily News Archive via Getty Images. 2. © Estate of 3. Courtesy Hats from the Heart. 4. Courtesy Library © Condé Nast. 5. Quick Magazine. Snugli 1. Courtesy Purchase—Smithsonian Collections Acquisition Program
Bikini 1. Photo Keystone/Getty Images/Staff. 2. Courtesy 1. © Horst. 2. Courtesy Joel Janovsky + Max Dayan. Aleksandr Rodchenko/RAO, Moscow/VAGA, New York. of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division, National Baby Tula. 2. Photo BSIP/UIG via Getty Images. 3. Photo and partial gift of Richard G. Pritzlaff. 3. Courtesy Diane
Janaína Diniz Guerra. Photo Joel Maia/Abril 3. © Condé Nast. Courtesy Marcus Tondo/ 4. © Sukita. Keffiyeh 1. Bettman via Getty Images. Photo Company Collection [LC-USZ62-131913]. Pearl Morton Broffman/Getty Images. Space Age 1. Licensed von Furstenberg. 4. © The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Comunicações S.A. 3. Courtesy Everett Collection. VogueRunway.com. 4. Courtesy Gilles Bensimon. Dr. 2. Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division Necklace 1. Bettmann via Getty Images. 2. Photo by Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved. Courtesy Art Resource, NY. Y-3 1. Photo Sasha/Getty
4. Public domain via Wikimedia Commons/ Martens 1. Photo Virginia Turbett/Redferns via Getty [LC-USZ62-76257 (b&w lm copy neg)]. 3. Photo Irving Eugene Robert Richee/John Kobal Foundation/Getty 2. Courtesy Yoshi Takata/DR. 3. Courtesy American Images/Stringer. 2, 3. Courtesy Yohji Yamamoto Inc.
Roundtheworld. 5. Courtesy Estate of Toni Frissell and Images. 2. © Pennie Smith. 3. Courtesy Peter Price/REX/ Penn for Vogue, February 15, 1965. © Condé Nast. Images. 3. © National Portrait Gallery, London. 4. Photo Craft Council Library & Archives. Spanx 1. Photo Yoga Pants 1. Courtesy Justin Lane/Epa/REX/
International Center of Photography, Museum Purchase, Shutterstock. 4. Photo Jeff Kravitz/Film Magic, Inc./ 4. Courtesy Salim Al Kadi. 5. Photo Keystone/Getty Debrocke/ClassicStock/Getty Images. Pencil Skirt Universal History Archive/UIG via Getty. Speedo 1. T.T. Shutterstock. 2. Photo Express/Getty Images/Stringer.
1979 (9. 1979). Birkin Bag 1. Courtesy Mike Daines/REX/ Getty Images. 5. Courtesy Symarip. Dutch Wax 1. Photo Images/Stringer. Kente Cloth 1. Courtesy Philippe J. 1. © Condé Nast. Courtesy Wayne Maser/Vogue. via Getty Images. 2. Photo Popperfoto/Getty Images. 3. Photo Eliot Elisofon/The LIFE Picture Collection/Getty
Shutterstock. 2. Photo Howard Sochurek/The LIFE Nathalie Lagneau/Catwalking/Getty Images. 2. Courtesy Kradolfer. 2. © 2015 Gary L. Hodges. Courtesy Ithaca 2. Courtesy Richard Sandler. 3. “Mad Men” courtesy 3. Courtesy AP Photo. 4. Photo Terry O’Neill/Hulton Images. YSL Touche Éclat 1–3. @johnfabulin. 4, 5. Photo
Picture Collection/Getty Images. 3. Courtesy Slow and Alexander Sarlay via Creative Commons. 3, 4. Courtesy College. 3. Courtesy REUTERS/Luc Gnago. 4. Courtesy Lions Gate Television, Inc. 4. Reproduced with Archive/Getty Images. Sports Jersey 1. Photo Brian Alfred Eisenstaedt/The LIFE Picture Collection/Getty
Steady Wins the Race by Mary Ping. Body Meets Vlisco Netherlands BV. Espadrille 1. Courtesy Silvia Basel Mission Archives Ref. No. D-30.30.022. Kilt permission of Punch Ltd., www.punch.co.uk. Plaid Bahr/Getty Images. 2. Courtesy Fotoagentur Sven Images
Dress—Dress Meets Body 1. Courtesy MoMA Archives. Olsen/REX/Shutterstock. 2. © Melitó Casals “Meli”/ 1. © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2017. Courtesy Royal Flannel Shirt 1. Courtesy Charles Peterson. 2. © Steven Simon. 3. Courtesy Maria Jahnkoy. 4. Photo Dennis
Photographic Archive/Soichi Sunami. 2–4. Photos by Fundació Gala-Salvador Dalí, Figueres, 2017. Image Collection Trust. 2. Courtesy Ben Westwood & the Meisel via Art + Commerce. 3. Courtesy Pendleton Grombkowski/Getty Images. Stiletto 1. Photo David

286 287

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen