Sie sind auf Seite 1von 13

Chapter 36 Outcome Competencies

After completing this chapter, the reader


should be able to:
1. Understand and apply important terms
and concepts introduced in this
chapter.
2. Identify dilution ventilation goals.
3. Identify examples of workplaces and
operations compatible with dilution
ventilation controls.
Key Terms
acceptable concentration • AHU • ASHRAE 62
• control • density correction factor • dilu-
tion ventilation • emission factors • emission
rate • exposures • HVAC • general exhaust
ventilation • IAQ • mixing factor • OA, SA, RA,
EA • occupancy • thermal comfort • ventila-
tion controls

4. Determine appropriate dilution air


volume flowrates. Key Topics
5. Estimate the amount of dilution air
being delivered to a space. I. All Human Occupancies Require
6. Recognize dilution ventilation limita- Ventilation
tions and alternatives. II. Correcting for Non-Standard Air
Density
III. Fundamental Relationships
IV. Selection Criteria: Is Dilution
Ventilation the Best Primary Control
Option?
V. Implementing Dilution Ventilation
VI. Special Considerations When
Ventilating for Comfort and
Maintaining Good IAQ in Commercial
Prerequisite Knowledge Buildings
VII. Common Problems with HVAC Systems
In conjunction with this chapter, the user VIII. Estimating the Amount of Outdoor Air
should read or review the following chapters. (OA) Required
IX. Estimating the Amount of outdoor Air
Chapter Chapter (OA) Being Delivered
Number Topic X. References
7 Principles of Evaluating
Worker Exposure
9 Occupational and
Environmental Health Risk
Assessment
18 Indoor Air Quality
35 General Methods for the
Control of Airborne Hazards

1190 ___________________________ The Occupational Environment: Its Evaluation, Control, and Management, 3rd edition

Copyright AIHA® For personal use only. Do not distribute.


Dilution
Ventilation
36
By D. Jeff Burton, CIH, PE

All Human Occupancies consult with experts before actually applying


the principles presented herein.
Require Ventilation A good dilution ventilation system
Ventilation is the use of supply and exhaust allows and encourages emissions of air cont-
air to replenish oxygen, to dilute or remove aminants to thoroughly mix with surround-
air contaminants and odors, and to provide ing air and then provides fresh outdoor air
thermal conditioning. All occupied spaces to mix with and dilute contaminants to
require ventilation of some kind. some safe acceptable concentration before
One important type of ventilation — the contaminated air reaches occupant or
local exhaust ventilation (LEV) — contains employee breathing zones.
controls, or captures emitted air contami- Table 36.1 shows common properties
nants at or near their sources and is covered and definitions of air used in all ventilation
in Chapter 37. This chapter covers the other systems. Air has many of the same measur-
major type of ventilation, dilution ventila- able properties as many other materials,
e.g., weight, density, volume, viscosity, tem-
tion, for both industrial and non-industrial
perature, and so forth. The standard weight
occupancies. Dilution ventilation systems
density of air is about 0.075 lbs per cubic
are sometimes called general exhaust venti-
foot, for example. This compares to water,
lation or turbulent air mixing ventilation.
as shown in Figure 36.1, which weighs about
Non-mixing types of dilution ventilation,
62.4 lbs/cubic foot. The industrial ventilation
e.g., plug flow, displacement ventilation are
definition of STP is shown in Table 36.1.
not included.
This chapter is written to help the prac-
ticing IH apply basic dilution ventilation prin- Correcting for Non-Standard
ciples. Theory, derivation of equations and Air Density
more technical details can be found in the
References. Materials presented in this chap- With every type of ventilation operating at
ter are thought to be compatible with current non-standard conditions, an air density
standards of good practice. However, the IH correction factor, dc, can be employed to
should always review current standards and account for air density and volume changes

Figure 36.1 — Comparison of the Weight Densities of Water and Air at Standard Conditions (STP).

Section 6: Methods of Controlling the Work Environment _____________________________________________________1191

Copyright AIHA® For personal use only. Do not distribute.


AIHA® — American Industrial Hygiene Association

Table 36.1 — Common Properties of Air combined into an equation called the
Molecular Weight (MW) = 29 g/mole Perfect or Ideal Gas Law, derived from
Standard air weight density = 0.075 lb/ cu ft (1.2 kg/cubic meter) Equation 36-1, which is often represented as:
at STP
STP = Standard Temperature and Pressure P1V1 P2V2
Traditional industrial ventilation definition of STP: T = 70F, BP = ——— = ——— (36-2)
29.92 inches Hg, dry air (T = 21C, BP = 760 mm Hg, dry air) T1 T2
Traditional HVAC definition of STP: T = 68F, BP = 29.92 inches Hg,
50% Relative Humidity (T = 20C, BP = 760 mm Hg, 50% RH)
The factor dc is derived by transposing
terms in the Ideal Gas equation. A widely
when the temperature or pressure is differ- used definition of dc is shown in the follow-
ent than the standard condition. As the air ing equation:
moves to a higher altitude, for example, its
weight density is reduced and its volume TSTP PB
increases as shown in Figure 36.2. The mag- dc = ——— × ——— (36-3)
nitude of this difference can be calculated.
Tactual PBSTP
Air density is related to pressure and
temperature through the perfect gas equa-
tion of state: where:

P = ρRT (36-1) PB = absolute barometric pressure.


T= absolute temperature in R or K
where: R= degrees Rankine, R = °F + 460
K= degrees Kelvin, K = °C + 273
P= absolute pressure, lbs/sq ft (psfa)
ρ= density, lbs/ft3 The actual air density can be calculated
R= gas constant, 53.35 ft-lb/lbm-ºR using Equation 36-4:
T= absolute temperature, ºR
ρactual = ρSTP × dc (36-4)
When all other conditions are equal,
changes in air density and volume, V, vary Example 36.1. At a plant near Salt Lake
linearly with changes in absolute tempera- City at an altitude of 5000 feet, the summer-
ture, T. Similarly, air density varies linearly time air temperature is 90°F and the baro-
with the change in air pressure, P (e.g., if the metric pressure is 24.89 in Hg. What is the air
pressure increases by 5%, the density will density correction factor, dC? The actual air
increase by 5%). These two relationships are density?

Figure 36.2 — Atmospheric Air Expands as Temperature Increases or Pressure Decreases.

1192 ___________________________ The Occupational Environment: Its Evaluation, Control, and Management, 3rd edition

Copyright AIHA® For personal use only. Do not distribute.


Chapter 36 — Dilution Ventilation

Using Equation (36-3), the density correc- Contaminants in air must be diluted to
tion factor can be calculated: below some acceptable concentration, Ca. Ca
is usually chosen by the industrial hygienist
(460 + 70) PB as some fraction of a published OEL or other
dC = ————— × ——— = 0.802 exposure standard.
(460 + 90) 29.92
Selection Criteria: Is Dilution
And, the actual air density can be deter-
mines with Equation 36-4:
Ventilation the Best Primary
Control Option?
lb lb Dilution ventilation is not always the most
ρactual = 0.075 ——— × 0.802 = 0.060 ——— appropriate primary control. Table 36.2 shows
cu ft cu ft typical selection criteria for dilution ventila-
tion as the primary approach to emission and
Information on determining the air exposure control. When conditions in the sec-
density correction factor and handling ond category of the table prevail, costs and
unusual density corrections for high static energy consumption will be high. If the out-
pressures in ductwork and high moisture side air is more contaminated, for example,
content in hot air is presented in dilution cannot be achieved unless the out-
References 1 and 2. door air is scrubbed of those air contami-
nants. Source removal, LEV, generation con-
trol, substitution, or other forms of primary
Fundamental Relationships control should be considered, possibly with
As mentioned above, emissions and subse- dilution ventilation as a secondary control.
quent employee or occupant exposures are In the vast majority of cases the outside
often controlled with fresh dilution air in air will be less contaminated than indoor
both industrial and nonindustrial environ- air. Researchers report, however, that out-
ments. For a constant emission source, no door concentrations of the reactive gases
contaminant sinks, perfect air mixing, and a sulfur dioxide and ozone often are greater
constant dilution air flowrate, the following than indoor concentrations in commercial
basic ratios describe the resulting equilibri- buildings. Another exception occurs when
um concentration in a ventilated space (e.g., there is an outdoor source near an air
chamber, room, building, space, lab, work- intake, such as a truck idling next to a build-
room, plant, hood, etc.). ing air intake, in which case the outdoor con-
centrations of carbon monoxide, nitrogen
E oxides, and smoke may be higher than those
in indoor air. Also, summertime concentra-
C = —— (36-5)
tions of mold spores and pollen are often
Q
greater outdoors than indoors.
Air contaminants emitted from an indus-
where:
trial process, plus carbon monoxide, nitro-
gen oxides, and respirable dust concentra-
E = emission rate tions are usually greater inside the building.
C = concentration But this may be reversed if significant out-
Q = dilution ventilation rate in the door sources exist. For example, when the
same units as E wind blows in a dry climate, outdoor levels
of dust may exceed indoor dust concentra-
Emission and ventilation rates are usu- tions. Or, if a parking garage is attached to
ally expressed as cubic feet per minute a building, outside air concentrations of
(cfm), actual feet per minute (acfm) when carbon monoxide may be higher. Air concen-
the air density correction factor has been trations of total volatile organic compounds
applied or standard cubic feet per minute (TVOC), carbon dioxide, formaldehyde,
(scfm) when standard air conditions (STP) radon, and environmental tobacco smoke
are assumed. In the SI system, the tradition- concentrations are almost always greater
al units are cubic meters per second. indoors than outdoors.

Section 6: Methods of Controlling the Work Environment _____________________________________________________1193

Copyright AIHA® For personal use only. Do not distribute.


AIHA® — American Industrial Hygiene Association

Table 36.2 — Conditions Favorable and Unfavorable for Dilution Ventilation as the Primary Control
Certain conditions lend themselves to dilution with outdoor air:
Indoor air contaminants are of relatively low toxicity or cause minor irritation.
Contaminant concentrations in occupant air are not hazardous.
Smoking is not allowed in the occupied space.
Emission sources are difficult or expensive to remove or control.
Emission rates occur uniformly over time.
Emission sources are widely dispersed.
Emissions do not occur close to the breathing zone of occupants (using the IH definition of breathing zone).
Moderate climatic conditions prevail.
The outside air is less contaminated than the inside air.
The HVAC system is capable of conditioning the dilution air required.

This means dilution ventilation is less effective and more expensive when:
Air contaminants are highly toxic or irritating materials.
Contaminant concentrations are hazardous or cause great discomfort.
Smoking is allowed in the occupied space.
Emission sources are easy to remove or control.
Emission rates vary with time.
Emission sources consist of large, point sources.
People’s breathing zones are in the immediate vicinity of emission sources (using the IH definition of a breathing
zone).
The building is located in severe climates.
The outside air is more contaminated than the inside air.
The existing HVAC system is not capable of conditioning the outside air.

Case Study 1. Employees of a new office plant and office employees were concerned
building were complaining about “bad air.” about potential exposure because the build-
Specific complaints included headache, ing’s air handling unit (AHU) served both the
watery eyes, irritation of the nose and office and the production area. An occasion-
throat, and dry, itchy skin. The industrial al “chemical” odor infiltrated the office area
hygienist was asked to investigate and from the tank room. Plant employees were
determine if additional dilution ventilation concerned about fugitive emissions from the
was appropriate. tanks and office employees were asking for
Outcome. The industrial hygienist found more dilution air. The industrial hygienist
that at the end of the day carbon dioxide performed an problem characterization
totaled about 1200 ppm in the return air study following the procedure outlined in
plenum. No specific chemical or biogenic Chapter 35.
sources, indoors or outdoors, were immedi- Outcome. Traditional IH testing deter-
ately obvious. However, the building was only mined that the fugitive emissions from the
six weeks old. The measured carbon dioxide tanks were at a concentration above the
concentration suggested insufficient outside odor threshold, but employee exposures were
air to dilute airborne contaminants. The fact well below appropriate OELs. Improving the
that this was a new building suggested the local exhaust ventilation with additional baf-
problem of off-gassing. Recently built heat- fles alongside the tanks helped reduce fugi-
ing, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) tive emissions but did not entirely eliminate
systems are usually capable of providing them. Complaints in the office were alleviat-
more air and better distribution than in the ed by additional dilution ventilation which
past. The industrial hygienist recommended reduced exposure concentrations to below
that during the first 4–6 months of occupan- odor and irritation thresholds. Other control
cy, the system be set to deliver 100% fresh air. solutions could have included isolating the
Case Study 2. A Los Angeles-based com- office HVAC system from the tank area AHU,
puter components firm operated 15 small dip isolating the tank area from the rest of the
tanks in a room adjacent to a set of offices. building, and moving the tank operation or
Although the dip tanks were enclosed and the offices to another building but none were
provided with local exhaust ventilation, both considered cost-effective.

1194 ___________________________ The Occupational Environment: Its Evaluation, Control, and Management, 3rd edition

Copyright AIHA® For personal use only. Do not distribute.


Chapter 36 — Dilution Ventilation

Implementing Dilution G = generation or evaporation


quantity; US units = lbs, SI units =
Ventilation grams
If preliminary indications point to dilution MW = molecular weight or molecular
as a primary control measure, the industrial mass
hygienist should develop the following infor- t = approximate time of generation
mation: (1) a profile of the contaminant or evaporation, minutes (seconds)
sources; (2) an estimate of emission rates; (3) dc = density correction factor, unitless
a description of the space (e.g, volume); (4)
an acceptable concentration for exposure; Accuracy. Note that these calculations
and (5) an appropriate air dilution flowrate. are considered to be “approximate” in most
Sources. A basic understanding of emis- cases. Always use good judgment about the
sion sources should be obtained, if possible. answers obtained.
Any information is better than none; intelli- The Space. Obtain all of the physical
gent professional judgment is better than no parameters of the building, its equipment
estimate. This information-gathering task and processes, and its occupants. Gather
includes descriptions of emission sources; data on the occupied space, width, height,
chemical description of emissions to include length, barriers, obstructions, and so forth.
chemical composition, size and shape, and Building plans are often helpful.
temperature; current airborne concentra- Existing Ventilation and Air Movement.
tions; and rates of generation or evapora- Identifying and understanding existing ven-
tion over time. tilation is important. This might include
Steady State Emission Rates. Estimating general heating and air conditioning venti-
generation or evaporation rates for air cont- lation, location of space heaters, open
aminants requires ingenuity, detective work, doors and windows, use of freestanding
and skill. Published emission factors are fans, LEV systems, and other dilution sys-
often used. tems already in place. Prevailing air move-
Once an estimate of the evaporation or ment in the space, including the directions
generation rate is established, it is possible and velocities, should be identified. Ask
to estimate an emission rate as shown in about other times of the day, other seasons,
Equation 36-6 which is based on the funda- and when the operation is running differ-
mental natural relationship that one pound- ently (for instance, what happens during
molecular weight (lb-mole) of a material will very cold weather or when the local exhaust
evaporate to fill 387 cubic feet of space. In SI system is turned off).
units, one gram-mole evaporates to fill about Occupants. Obtain a thorough under-
24.1 liters of air. These constants are true at standing of the physical locations of peo-
the ventilation definition of STP. Dividing the ple; time considerations, such as how much
emission volume by the time over which it time people spend in particular locations
evaporates provides the units of cubic feet and how they interact with emission
per minute (or cubic meters per second), the sources; and training, education, and
same units used in ventilation for airflow. cooperativeness.
Acceptable Concentration. As men-
387 × G tioned above, the industrial hygienist must
E = ——————, in US Units (36-6a) determine an acceptable level of exposure.
MW × t × dC Usually it is some fraction of existing expo-
sure standards (e.g., 10% of the OEL). With-
0.0241 × G out an acceptable concentration, modeling
E = ——————, in SI Units (36-6b) is impossible, and predicting the benefits of
MW × t × dC dilution ventilation is difficult.
Dilution Ventilation Rates. Dilution air
Where: volumes should be based on the information
developed above. The volume flow rate of
E = volume rate of vapor emitted at air required to dilute a constant volume flow
STP conditions, dc = 1; US units = rate of emitted vapor can be approximated
ft3/min, SI units = m3/sec as follows:

Section 6: Methods of Controlling the Work Environment _____________________________________________________1195

Copyright AIHA® For personal use only. Do not distribute.


AIHA® — American Industrial Hygiene Association

E × Keff × 106 distributed where it will be most effective


Qd = ——————— (36-7) (e.g., a supply register serves every office);
Ca (3) returns are located as close to contami-
nant sources as possible; and (4) auxiliary
or freestanding fans are used to enhance
Where:
mixing.
Qd = volume flowrate of dilution air, Air Changes. Once the required dilution
scfm ventilation is known, the number of air
E = emission rate of vapor, scfm changes per hour that will occur in the
Ca = the acceptable exposure space being ventilated can be calculated.
concentration, ppm The concept of an air change does not imply
Keff = a mixing factor to account for that a complete change of all air in the
space will occur. The percentage of air in the
incomplete or poor delivery of
space which is exchanged depends on the
dilution air to occupants airflow within the space, which will be influ-
enced by the distribution and locations of
Air Mixing. The mixing of air is some- the incoming and exiting air. In order to
times called the ventilation efficiency or the achieve equilibrium pressure, incoming and
ventilation effectiveness factor. exiting air volumes must be balanced.
Mathematically, it can be stated as: Equation 36-9 shows how to calculate the
number of air changes per hour (N) within a
Actual Qd defined space.
Keff = ————— (36-8)
Ideal Qd Qd × 60
N = ———— (36-9)
The value of Keff ranges from 1.0 to 2 in V
most cases, with excursions to K =3 in some
industrial applications. If it seems likely that Where:
Keff > 2, improving mixing or identifying
N = the number of air changes per
another form of control should be consid-
hour
ered because dilution is likely to be too
V = the volume of the space being
expensive, and the uncertainties are too
ventilated
high. Typical values for Keff in commercial
buildings are shown in Table 36.3. Example 36.2. Toluene evaporates into
Dilution will be more effective, and the workroom air from multiple locations of
lower values of the mixing factor, Keff, can a coating process. An industrial hygienist is
be selected when (1) dilution air is routed asked to evaluate and determine the require-
through the occupied zone; (2) supply air is ments for adequate dilution ventilation.

Table 36.3 — Typical Mixing Factors for Commercial Buildings (for dilution of air contaminants)
Keff Typical Conditions
1.0 Wide open office spaces with good supply and return locations, all HVAC equipment function
adequately; no point sources of emission.

1.1 Supply and return conditions not ideal but use of freestanding fans to create mixing; no point sources
of emission.

1.2–1.4 Poor placement of supply and return registers; partitioned offices with generally adequate distribu
tion of supply and return locations; discernable but small point sources; warm air supply and return
in ceiling.

1.4 –2.0 Crowded spaces with tight partitions; poor supply and return locations; point sources of emission
close to people; people located close to interior walls. Steps should be taken to improve mixing or use
other emission and exposure control approaches.

1196 ___________________________ The Occupational Environment: Its Evaluation, Control, and Management, 3rd edition

Copyright AIHA® For personal use only. Do not distribute.


Chapter 36 — Dilution Ventilation

Outcome. A problem characterization (25,000 µg/m2/day) × 250m2


study produced the following estimates: Emission rate ≈ ———————————————–—
Nine pounds of toluene are uniformly evapo- µg g ⎛ min ⎞
rated from the process during an 8-hour peri- 1,000,000 —– × 454 —– × ⎜1440 —– ⎥
⎜ ⎥
od. The workroom has excellent air mixing in g lb ⎝ day ⎠
its 125,000 cubic foot space. The air density
correction factor for the location was deter- ≈ 9.56 × 10-6 lb/min
mined to be 0.95. The IH suggested an accept-
able concentration of 5% of the published The emission rate is the weight of the
OEL of 100 ppm. generated contaminate over a period of
Estimates for the volume flow rates (Qd) time; this is equivalent to G/t in Equation 36-
required for dilution to the Ca are shown in 6. Therefore, the volume rate of vapor emit-
the following equations using: G = 9 lbs; t = ted can be determined by substituting this
480 minutes; OEL = 100 ppm; Ca = 5 ppm; Keff = value into Equation 36-6:
1.0; dc = 0.95; MW = 92.1; and workroom vol-
387 × G 387 G
ume = 125,000 cubic feet. Using Equations E = —————— = —–——— × ——
36-6 and 36-7: MW × t × dc MW × dc t

387 × 9
387
E ≈ ————————— ≈ 0.08293 acfm
E = —–—— × 9.56 × 10-6 = 1.23 × 10-4 scfm
92.1 × 480 × 0.95 30 x 1

And, The volume flow of dilution air required


to maintain the background concentration
0.08293 × 1 × 106 below 0.05 ppm with this emission fate of
Qd ≈ ————————— ≈ 16,600 acfm contaminant can be determined using
5 Equation 36-7.

Then, the resulting number of air (1.23 × 10-4) × 1.25 × 106


changes per hour can be determined: Qd = ———————————— ≈ 3,080 scfm
0.05
16,600 × 60
N ≈ —————— ≈ 8 air changes per hour Note that Example 36-3 considers the
125,000 worst case scenario. The practical meaning of
this calculation is that if the existing ventila-
Example 36.3. New particleboard wood tion system is not capable of providing at
shelving has been proposed for installation in least 3,080 cfm of fresh dilution air then some
a large office bay. The industrial hygienist was other solution will be required (e.g., emission-
asked to estimate the volume flow rate of retarding coatings, alternative shelving mate-
formaldehyde (HCHO) emitted and the dilu- rials, pre-installation airing, etc.).
tion air volume flow rate required to keep
background concentrations of HCHO at or Special Considerations when
below 0.05 ppm. Assume: STP, MW = 30, A = 250
m2 of particleboard, Ca = 0.05 ppm, Keff = 1.25. Ventilating for Comfort and
Outcome. After searching product litera- Maintaining Good IAQ in
ture the industrial hygienist found the sup-
plier’s published emission rate for particle-
Commercial Buildings
board ranged from 2000 to 25,000 microgram Heating, ventilating and air conditioning
per m2 per day (24 h). To evaluate the worst (HVAC) equipment is used for tempering,
case the IH assumed an HCHO emission rate dehumidifying, and cleaning air for comfort,
for the first few weeks after installation of safety, and health. HVAC systems also may
25,000 micrograms/m2/day. contribute to odor control and to mainte-
Converting the units from micrograms/ nance of air contaminant levels at accept-
m2/day to lbs/min: able concentrations.

Section 6: Methods of Controlling the Work Environment _____________________________________________________1197

Copyright AIHA® For personal use only. Do not distribute.


AIHA® — American Industrial Hygiene Association

The widely used standard ASHRAE 55 has are not as impacted by outdoor conditions
historically applied an 80/20/10 rule to estab- (see Figure 36.3).
lish satisfactory comfort performance. In this When designing an adequate HVAC sys-
approach, if 80% of the occupants are satisfied tem, the combinations of air volume flowrate,
with all environmental conditions (e.g., tem- temperature, humidity, and air quality which
perature, humidity, odor, drafts), or if less than will satisfy the needs of the occupants of a
20% are dissatisfied, then comfort require- space must be selected carefully. Air handling
ments have been met. If more than 10% are systems generally consist of:
dissatisfied with any one condition, then satis-
• Outside air (OA) intakes, plenums and
factory performance is not achieved.
ducts
HVAC engineers talk in terms of “zones.”
• Filters
Each zone usually contains a thermostat to
• Supply air fans (SA)
control temperature. The more zones there
• Heating and/or cooling coils
are, the better chance there is of providing
• Humidifying and/or dehumidifying
satisfactory comfort conditions for more
equipment
people. Typically, air in perimeter zones is
• Supply air ducts (SA)
harder to condition because of the required
• Distribution plenums, ducts, terminal
filtration, heating, cooling and humidity con-
boxes or devices, supply registers
trols. Outdoor conditions (temperature,
• Dampers
wind, sun, rain) can greatly impact the need
• Return air grilles, plenums and ducts
for thermal conditioning. Interior zones
(RA)
often need only filtration and cooling and
• Exhaust (or relief) air systems (EA)
• Controls and instrumentation
Figure 36.4 is a schematic of a simple,
constant volume commercial HVAC system –
a single-zone, constant air volume system
(SZ-CAV) showing much of the equipment
mentioned above. These systems supply a
constant airflow to the space and vary the
temperature and humidity.
Variable Air Volume (VAV) systems are
often used because they provide energy con-
servation and lower operating costs. These
systems supply a varying airflow to the
space as a function of the need for tempera-
Figure 36.3 — Zones within an HVAC System. ture and humidity controls. Operating cost
savings can be obtained, for example, when
the VAV system actually reduces fan rpm. Air
volume and fan rpm are linearly related; if
the airflow is cut in half, then the rpm is cut
in half. But horsepower and rpm are related
through a third-power relationship. If the
rpm is reduced by half, the horsepower (and
energy costs) are reduced by about eight
times. Simply reducing airflow with fan inlet
dampers also results in lower motor operat-
ing costs and energy consumption, but not
by the same factor as reducing fan rpm. See
Reference 2 for more detail.

Common Problems with


HVAC Systems
Figure 36.4 — Schematic Representatation of a Mechanical In many studies of IAQ problems, NIOSH has
Room Containing HVAC Equipment and the Spaces It Serves. found that about 50% of IAQ problems and

1198 ___________________________ The Occupational Environment: Its Evaluation, Control, and Management, 3rd edition

Copyright AIHA® For personal use only. Do not distribute.


Chapter 36 — Dilution Ventilation

Table 36.4 — Common Problems Found in HVAC Systems and their Typical Impacts
Inadequate design and/or poor operation – not enough dilution of air contaminants in occupied spaces
Inadequate replacement air supply – building under negative pressure, high concentrations of air contaminants
Poor distribution of supply air in the space – certain areas receive little air exchange
Insufficient air delivery, or not delivered appropriately, or not mixed in the space – stuffiness
Improper pressure differences – doors hard to open, outside air leaking into/through building envelope
Temperature extremes – too hot or too cold
Humidity extremes – too dry or too humid
Poor filtration –dirt, bugs, pollen in air delivery system
Poor maintenance – equipment not functioning correctly
Energy conservation has become No. 1 priority – reduction of outdoor air delivery rates
Settled water in system – mold
Visual evidence of slime or mold – odors, spores, complaints
Improper balance of distribution system — some areas do not receive sufficient outdoor air
Dampers at incorrect positions — some areas do not receive sufficient outdoor air
Supply terminal diffusers not at correct positions — inadequate distribution of supply air
VAV systems capable of shutting down air delivery — occupants do not receive sufficient SA and OA

complaints originated in the HVAC system In its simplest form, the amount of air to
itself. Common problems with HVAC systems be supplied is estimated by an equation sim-
that result IAQ complaints are shown in ilar to that shown below.
Table 36.4.
QOA = Qp + Qb = RpPd + RbAb (36-10)
Estimating the Amount of
Where:
Outdoor Air (OA) Required
QOA = minimum design OA ventilation
The ASHRAE standard 62–2010 on IAQ sug-
rate
gests an “air per person” and “air per square
Qp = ventilation required to control
foot” approach for determining the minimum
amount of OA to be supplied to various occu- “people” sources of air
pancies for dilution purposes, see Table 36.5. contaminants
The ASHRAE standard assumes excellent mix- Qp = ventilation required to control
ing, distribution and delivery of the outdoor “building” sources of air
air to occupants. It also assumes a certain contaminants
occupant loading. Where these are not the Rp = minimum rate of outdoor air in
case, additional OA may be required or better cfm per person
mixing and distribution provided. In cases Pd = number of people in the occupied
where definitive data are not available, the area
designer/user can use default values. Rb = minimum rate of outdoor air in
This approach recognizes that air pollu- cfm per square foot of occupied
tants also arise from non-people sources: area
building materials, furnishings, and the Ab = floor area in occupied portion of
HVAC equipment itself. However, the
the building, square feet
approach decreases the total amount of out-
door air historically required for some occu- Example 36.4. In an 2,000 sq ft office
pancies of interest to industrial hygienists. space with 14 occupants, the minimum
However, these are minimums and can be required ventilation rate to the occupied
adjusted upward as the need arises. zone can be determined using Equation 36-10.

Table 36.5 — Sample of ASHRAE 62–2010 Standard Table 6.1


Default Default
Occupancy Outdoor Air (OA) — Required Ventilation Rates —
Application Persons per 1000 sf cfm/person cfm OA /person + cfm/ft2
Office Space 5 17 5 + 0.06
Conference Room 50 6 5 + 0.06
Science Lab (school) 25 17 10 + 0.18

Section 6: Methods of Controlling the Work Environment _____________________________________________________1199

Copyright AIHA® For personal use only. Do not distribute.


AIHA® — American Industrial Hygiene Association

QOA = (5)(14) + (0.06)(2000) = QOA


190 cfm of fresh outdoor air %OA = —— × 100 (36-11)
QSA
This results in an OA rate (OA/person) of
13.6 cfm/person, slightly less than tradition- TRA–TMA
al standard minimum of 15–20 cfm/person. %OA = ———— × 100 (36-12)
Example 36.5. To provide sufficient out- TRA–TOA
door air in a conference rooms the proposed
ventilation rates are 5 cfm/person and 0.06
CRA–CSA
cfm/sq ft. For a small conference room of
750 sq ft occupied by 30 occupants, the mini- %OA = ———— × 100 (36-13)
mum required ventilation rate is: CRA–COA
Where:
QOA = (5)(30) + (0.06)(750) =
195 cfm of fresh outdoor air
QOA = volume of outdoor air (cfm)
QSA = volume of mixed return and
This results in a OA rate (OA/person) of
6.5 cfm/person. outside air, the supply air (cfm)
In certain circumstances, ASHRAE 62–2010 TRA = temperature of return air (dry-
also requires the application of the ventila- bulb)
tion effectiveness factor to account for poor TMA = temperature of mixed return and
mixing or distribution of the air. A typical outside air, the supply air (dry-
default value for Keff is 1.2. Additionally, the bulb)
designer may have to take into account TOA = temperature of outdoor air (dry-
occupant population diversity and other fac- bulb)
tors in the space which also could increase CRA = concentration of CO2 in return air
the amount of air required. See Reference 5 (ppm)
for additional details. CSA = concentration of CO2 in supply
Example 36.6. Continuing with Example
air (ppm)
36.4, if the ventilation effectiveness factor
COA = concentration of CO2 in outdoor
for air distribution and mixing is estimated
to be 80%, or Keff =1.25, what is the required air (ppm)
total outdoor ventilation rate?
Example 36.8. The design air volume flow
Total QOA = QOA × Keff = (190)(1.25) = rates at an air handling unit (AHU) are as fol-
238 cfm of fresh outdoor air lows: QSA = 12,500 scfm, and QOA = 1600 cfm.
What percentage of OA would be expected
This results in a total OA rate per person from this design? If the intended number of
of 17 cfm/person. employees served by the AHU is 90, how
much air per person will be delivered?
Estimating the Amount of
1600
Outdoor Air (OA) Being %OA = ——— × 100 = 12.8%
Delivered 12500
In addition to the traditional approach of for
The QOA per occupant (1600 cfm/90 peo-
estimating the volumetric flow of air by mea-
suring the air velocity in and the area of ple) from this design would be approximate-
ductwork (see Chapter 38), it is possible to ly 18 cfm/person.
estimate the percentage of outdoor air (OA) Example 36.9. Assume the following
in the supply air (SA) by measuring tempera- wintertime temperatures were measured
tures or carbon dioxide content of the vari- by an IH at the HVAC system in an office
ous air streams at the HVAC equipment. The building: TRA = 74°F, TMA = 66°F, and TOA =
following ratios show the fractions of out- 40°F. Use these temperature measure-
door air (OA) in the supply air (SA). Figure 36.4 ments to estimate the percentage of out-
shows the locations of OA, SA, MA, and RA. door air entering the system.

1200 ___________________________ The Occupational Environment: Its Evaluation, Control, and Management, 3rd edition

Copyright AIHA® For personal use only. Do not distribute.


Chapter 36 — Dilution Ventilation

74 – 66 Example 36.10. The carbon dioxide con-


%OA = ———— × 100 ≈ 24% centration is measured at 1200 ppm at 5:30
74 – 40 pm, when all of the people have departed a
small office building. The air handler is left to
In addition to the temperature measure- run in its normal operating mode. By 7:30 pm,
ments, CO2 levels were also measured at the the CO2 concentration has been reduced to
same locations: CRA ≈ 870 ppm, CSA ≈ 750 ppm, 500 ppm. The outside CO2 concentration is
and COA ≈ 410 ppm. These values also can be 400 ppm. How many air changes per hour of
used to estimate the percentage of outdoor OA does this suggest? What is the QOA for a
air in the system. space with a volume of 50,000 cu ft?

870 – 750 ln(1200 – 400) – ln(500 – 400)


%OA = ————— × 100 ≈ 26% N ≈ ——————————————— =
870 – 410 2
Measured carbon dioxide concentrations
can also be used to estimate the amount of 1.04 air changes/hr
OA reaching a specific area of the building.
During the day, carbon dioxide tends to build
up to some steady state concentration, e.g., 1.04 × 50000
from 450 ppm in the early morning before QOA = ——————— ≈ 870 cfm
workers arrive to a fairly constant 950 ppm 60
at noon. When everyone leaves the building,
and the carbon dioxide sources are gone, the The discussion and examples in this
outside air will dilute carbon dioxide at an chapter have assumed steady state condi-
exponential rate depending on the volume of tions for emission source and dilution venti-
OA being delivered. Knowing initial and final lation rates. Additional references are avail-
concentrations and the time elapsed, the fol- able to provide information on the exponen-
lowing formulas can be used to predict the tial buildup and decay of airborne concen-
volume flow of OA delivered. The outdoor trations during non-steady conditions.
concentration of carbon dioxide must be Additional information on the properties
measured because that will affect the rate at and behavior of water in air (i.e., humidity
which the inside CO2 concentration can drop. concerns; psychrometrics) is provided in
lnCi – lnCt Reference 2 and References 4–7.
N ≈ ————— (36-14)
T References
1. Burton, D.J.: Industrial Ventilation Workbook,
N × VR
7th edition. Bountiful, UT: IVE, Inc., 2011.
QOA = ———— (36-15) 2. Burton, D.J.: IAQ and HVAC Workbook,
60 Burton, D. Jeff, 4th edition. IVE, Inc.
Bountiful, UT.
Where: 3. American Conference of Governmental
Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH®): Industrial
N = air exchange per hour of fresh Ventilation, a Manual of Recommended
outdoor air (OA), ac/hr Practice for Design, 27th edition. Cincinnati,
Ci = Initial concentration of CO2 at OH: ACGIH®, 2010.
start of test (minus the outdoor 4. American Society of Heating, Refrigeration,
air concentration, usually about and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE):
400 ppm) ANSI/ASHRAE 55-2004, Thermal
Ct = Concentration of CO2 at end of Environmental Conditions for Human
Occupancy. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE, 1992.
test (minus the outdoor air
5. American Society of Heating, Refrigeration,
concentration) and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE):
T = time elapsed between start and ANSI/ASHRAE 62–2010, Ventilation for
end of test in hours Acceptable Indoor Air Quality. Atlanta, GA:
VR = volume of space in cubic feet ASHRAE, 2010.

Section 6: Methods of Controlling the Work Environment _____________________________________________________1201

Copyright AIHA® For personal use only. Do not distribute.


AIHA® — American Industrial Hygiene Association

6. National Institute for Occupational Safety 8. American Industrial Hygiene Association


and Health (NIOSH) and U.S. Environmental (AIHA): ANSI/AIHA Z9 standards (Z9.1–2006
Protection Agency (EPA): Building Air (Ventilation and Control of Airborne
Quality: A Guide for Building Owners and Contaminants During Open-Surface Tank
Facility Managers. Washington, D.C.: NIOSH Operations); Z9.2–2006 (Fundamentals
and EPA: (EPA/400/1-91-033). Government Governing the Design and Operation of
Printing Office, 1991. Local Exhaust Ventilation Systems);
7. American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, Z9.3–2007 (Spray Finishing Operations:
and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE): Safety Code for Design, Construction, and
ASHRAE Fundamentals Handbook, latest Ventilation); Z9.5–2003 (Laboratory
edition; American Society of Heating, Ventilation); Z9.6–2008 (Exhaust Systems for
Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Grinding, Polishing, and Buffing); Z9.7–2007
Engineers (ASHRAE): Atlanta, GA: 2009. (Recirculation of Air from Industrial Process
Exhaust Systems); Z9.9–2010 (Portable
Ventilation Systems); Z9.10–2010
(Fundamentals Governing the Design and
Operation of Dilution Ventilation Systems in
Industrial Occupancies). Fairfax, VA: AIHA.

1202 ___________________________ The Occupational Environment: Its Evaluation, Control, and Management, 3rd edition

Copyright AIHA® For personal use only. Do not distribute.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen