Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1190 ___________________________ The Occupational Environment: Its Evaluation, Control, and Management, 3rd edition
Figure 36.1 — Comparison of the Weight Densities of Water and Air at Standard Conditions (STP).
Table 36.1 — Common Properties of Air combined into an equation called the
Molecular Weight (MW) = 29 g/mole Perfect or Ideal Gas Law, derived from
Standard air weight density = 0.075 lb/ cu ft (1.2 kg/cubic meter) Equation 36-1, which is often represented as:
at STP
STP = Standard Temperature and Pressure P1V1 P2V2
Traditional industrial ventilation definition of STP: T = 70F, BP = ——— = ——— (36-2)
29.92 inches Hg, dry air (T = 21C, BP = 760 mm Hg, dry air) T1 T2
Traditional HVAC definition of STP: T = 68F, BP = 29.92 inches Hg,
50% Relative Humidity (T = 20C, BP = 760 mm Hg, 50% RH)
The factor dc is derived by transposing
terms in the Ideal Gas equation. A widely
when the temperature or pressure is differ- used definition of dc is shown in the follow-
ent than the standard condition. As the air ing equation:
moves to a higher altitude, for example, its
weight density is reduced and its volume TSTP PB
increases as shown in Figure 36.2. The mag- dc = ——— × ——— (36-3)
nitude of this difference can be calculated.
Tactual PBSTP
Air density is related to pressure and
temperature through the perfect gas equa-
tion of state: where:
1192 ___________________________ The Occupational Environment: Its Evaluation, Control, and Management, 3rd edition
Using Equation (36-3), the density correc- Contaminants in air must be diluted to
tion factor can be calculated: below some acceptable concentration, Ca. Ca
is usually chosen by the industrial hygienist
(460 + 70) PB as some fraction of a published OEL or other
dC = ————— × ——— = 0.802 exposure standard.
(460 + 90) 29.92
Selection Criteria: Is Dilution
And, the actual air density can be deter-
mines with Equation 36-4:
Ventilation the Best Primary
Control Option?
lb lb Dilution ventilation is not always the most
ρactual = 0.075 ——— × 0.802 = 0.060 ——— appropriate primary control. Table 36.2 shows
cu ft cu ft typical selection criteria for dilution ventila-
tion as the primary approach to emission and
Information on determining the air exposure control. When conditions in the sec-
density correction factor and handling ond category of the table prevail, costs and
unusual density corrections for high static energy consumption will be high. If the out-
pressures in ductwork and high moisture side air is more contaminated, for example,
content in hot air is presented in dilution cannot be achieved unless the out-
References 1 and 2. door air is scrubbed of those air contami-
nants. Source removal, LEV, generation con-
trol, substitution, or other forms of primary
Fundamental Relationships control should be considered, possibly with
As mentioned above, emissions and subse- dilution ventilation as a secondary control.
quent employee or occupant exposures are In the vast majority of cases the outside
often controlled with fresh dilution air in air will be less contaminated than indoor
both industrial and nonindustrial environ- air. Researchers report, however, that out-
ments. For a constant emission source, no door concentrations of the reactive gases
contaminant sinks, perfect air mixing, and a sulfur dioxide and ozone often are greater
constant dilution air flowrate, the following than indoor concentrations in commercial
basic ratios describe the resulting equilibri- buildings. Another exception occurs when
um concentration in a ventilated space (e.g., there is an outdoor source near an air
chamber, room, building, space, lab, work- intake, such as a truck idling next to a build-
room, plant, hood, etc.). ing air intake, in which case the outdoor con-
centrations of carbon monoxide, nitrogen
E oxides, and smoke may be higher than those
in indoor air. Also, summertime concentra-
C = —— (36-5)
tions of mold spores and pollen are often
Q
greater outdoors than indoors.
Air contaminants emitted from an indus-
where:
trial process, plus carbon monoxide, nitro-
gen oxides, and respirable dust concentra-
E = emission rate tions are usually greater inside the building.
C = concentration But this may be reversed if significant out-
Q = dilution ventilation rate in the door sources exist. For example, when the
same units as E wind blows in a dry climate, outdoor levels
of dust may exceed indoor dust concentra-
Emission and ventilation rates are usu- tions. Or, if a parking garage is attached to
ally expressed as cubic feet per minute a building, outside air concentrations of
(cfm), actual feet per minute (acfm) when carbon monoxide may be higher. Air concen-
the air density correction factor has been trations of total volatile organic compounds
applied or standard cubic feet per minute (TVOC), carbon dioxide, formaldehyde,
(scfm) when standard air conditions (STP) radon, and environmental tobacco smoke
are assumed. In the SI system, the tradition- concentrations are almost always greater
al units are cubic meters per second. indoors than outdoors.
Table 36.2 — Conditions Favorable and Unfavorable for Dilution Ventilation as the Primary Control
Certain conditions lend themselves to dilution with outdoor air:
Indoor air contaminants are of relatively low toxicity or cause minor irritation.
Contaminant concentrations in occupant air are not hazardous.
Smoking is not allowed in the occupied space.
Emission sources are difficult or expensive to remove or control.
Emission rates occur uniformly over time.
Emission sources are widely dispersed.
Emissions do not occur close to the breathing zone of occupants (using the IH definition of breathing zone).
Moderate climatic conditions prevail.
The outside air is less contaminated than the inside air.
The HVAC system is capable of conditioning the dilution air required.
This means dilution ventilation is less effective and more expensive when:
Air contaminants are highly toxic or irritating materials.
Contaminant concentrations are hazardous or cause great discomfort.
Smoking is allowed in the occupied space.
Emission sources are easy to remove or control.
Emission rates vary with time.
Emission sources consist of large, point sources.
People’s breathing zones are in the immediate vicinity of emission sources (using the IH definition of a breathing
zone).
The building is located in severe climates.
The outside air is more contaminated than the inside air.
The existing HVAC system is not capable of conditioning the outside air.
Case Study 1. Employees of a new office plant and office employees were concerned
building were complaining about “bad air.” about potential exposure because the build-
Specific complaints included headache, ing’s air handling unit (AHU) served both the
watery eyes, irritation of the nose and office and the production area. An occasion-
throat, and dry, itchy skin. The industrial al “chemical” odor infiltrated the office area
hygienist was asked to investigate and from the tank room. Plant employees were
determine if additional dilution ventilation concerned about fugitive emissions from the
was appropriate. tanks and office employees were asking for
Outcome. The industrial hygienist found more dilution air. The industrial hygienist
that at the end of the day carbon dioxide performed an problem characterization
totaled about 1200 ppm in the return air study following the procedure outlined in
plenum. No specific chemical or biogenic Chapter 35.
sources, indoors or outdoors, were immedi- Outcome. Traditional IH testing deter-
ately obvious. However, the building was only mined that the fugitive emissions from the
six weeks old. The measured carbon dioxide tanks were at a concentration above the
concentration suggested insufficient outside odor threshold, but employee exposures were
air to dilute airborne contaminants. The fact well below appropriate OELs. Improving the
that this was a new building suggested the local exhaust ventilation with additional baf-
problem of off-gassing. Recently built heat- fles alongside the tanks helped reduce fugi-
ing, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) tive emissions but did not entirely eliminate
systems are usually capable of providing them. Complaints in the office were alleviat-
more air and better distribution than in the ed by additional dilution ventilation which
past. The industrial hygienist recommended reduced exposure concentrations to below
that during the first 4–6 months of occupan- odor and irritation thresholds. Other control
cy, the system be set to deliver 100% fresh air. solutions could have included isolating the
Case Study 2. A Los Angeles-based com- office HVAC system from the tank area AHU,
puter components firm operated 15 small dip isolating the tank area from the rest of the
tanks in a room adjacent to a set of offices. building, and moving the tank operation or
Although the dip tanks were enclosed and the offices to another building but none were
provided with local exhaust ventilation, both considered cost-effective.
1194 ___________________________ The Occupational Environment: Its Evaluation, Control, and Management, 3rd edition
Table 36.3 — Typical Mixing Factors for Commercial Buildings (for dilution of air contaminants)
Keff Typical Conditions
1.0 Wide open office spaces with good supply and return locations, all HVAC equipment function
adequately; no point sources of emission.
1.1 Supply and return conditions not ideal but use of freestanding fans to create mixing; no point sources
of emission.
1.2–1.4 Poor placement of supply and return registers; partitioned offices with generally adequate distribu
tion of supply and return locations; discernable but small point sources; warm air supply and return
in ceiling.
1.4 –2.0 Crowded spaces with tight partitions; poor supply and return locations; point sources of emission
close to people; people located close to interior walls. Steps should be taken to improve mixing or use
other emission and exposure control approaches.
1196 ___________________________ The Occupational Environment: Its Evaluation, Control, and Management, 3rd edition
387 × 9
387
E ≈ ————————— ≈ 0.08293 acfm
E = —–—— × 9.56 × 10-6 = 1.23 × 10-4 scfm
92.1 × 480 × 0.95 30 x 1
The widely used standard ASHRAE 55 has are not as impacted by outdoor conditions
historically applied an 80/20/10 rule to estab- (see Figure 36.3).
lish satisfactory comfort performance. In this When designing an adequate HVAC sys-
approach, if 80% of the occupants are satisfied tem, the combinations of air volume flowrate,
with all environmental conditions (e.g., tem- temperature, humidity, and air quality which
perature, humidity, odor, drafts), or if less than will satisfy the needs of the occupants of a
20% are dissatisfied, then comfort require- space must be selected carefully. Air handling
ments have been met. If more than 10% are systems generally consist of:
dissatisfied with any one condition, then satis-
• Outside air (OA) intakes, plenums and
factory performance is not achieved.
ducts
HVAC engineers talk in terms of “zones.”
• Filters
Each zone usually contains a thermostat to
• Supply air fans (SA)
control temperature. The more zones there
• Heating and/or cooling coils
are, the better chance there is of providing
• Humidifying and/or dehumidifying
satisfactory comfort conditions for more
equipment
people. Typically, air in perimeter zones is
• Supply air ducts (SA)
harder to condition because of the required
• Distribution plenums, ducts, terminal
filtration, heating, cooling and humidity con-
boxes or devices, supply registers
trols. Outdoor conditions (temperature,
• Dampers
wind, sun, rain) can greatly impact the need
• Return air grilles, plenums and ducts
for thermal conditioning. Interior zones
(RA)
often need only filtration and cooling and
• Exhaust (or relief) air systems (EA)
• Controls and instrumentation
Figure 36.4 is a schematic of a simple,
constant volume commercial HVAC system –
a single-zone, constant air volume system
(SZ-CAV) showing much of the equipment
mentioned above. These systems supply a
constant airflow to the space and vary the
temperature and humidity.
Variable Air Volume (VAV) systems are
often used because they provide energy con-
servation and lower operating costs. These
systems supply a varying airflow to the
space as a function of the need for tempera-
Figure 36.3 — Zones within an HVAC System. ture and humidity controls. Operating cost
savings can be obtained, for example, when
the VAV system actually reduces fan rpm. Air
volume and fan rpm are linearly related; if
the airflow is cut in half, then the rpm is cut
in half. But horsepower and rpm are related
through a third-power relationship. If the
rpm is reduced by half, the horsepower (and
energy costs) are reduced by about eight
times. Simply reducing airflow with fan inlet
dampers also results in lower motor operat-
ing costs and energy consumption, but not
by the same factor as reducing fan rpm. See
Reference 2 for more detail.
1198 ___________________________ The Occupational Environment: Its Evaluation, Control, and Management, 3rd edition
Table 36.4 — Common Problems Found in HVAC Systems and their Typical Impacts
Inadequate design and/or poor operation – not enough dilution of air contaminants in occupied spaces
Inadequate replacement air supply – building under negative pressure, high concentrations of air contaminants
Poor distribution of supply air in the space – certain areas receive little air exchange
Insufficient air delivery, or not delivered appropriately, or not mixed in the space – stuffiness
Improper pressure differences – doors hard to open, outside air leaking into/through building envelope
Temperature extremes – too hot or too cold
Humidity extremes – too dry or too humid
Poor filtration –dirt, bugs, pollen in air delivery system
Poor maintenance – equipment not functioning correctly
Energy conservation has become No. 1 priority – reduction of outdoor air delivery rates
Settled water in system – mold
Visual evidence of slime or mold – odors, spores, complaints
Improper balance of distribution system — some areas do not receive sufficient outdoor air
Dampers at incorrect positions — some areas do not receive sufficient outdoor air
Supply terminal diffusers not at correct positions — inadequate distribution of supply air
VAV systems capable of shutting down air delivery — occupants do not receive sufficient SA and OA
complaints originated in the HVAC system In its simplest form, the amount of air to
itself. Common problems with HVAC systems be supplied is estimated by an equation sim-
that result IAQ complaints are shown in ilar to that shown below.
Table 36.4.
QOA = Qp + Qb = RpPd + RbAb (36-10)
Estimating the Amount of
Where:
Outdoor Air (OA) Required
QOA = minimum design OA ventilation
The ASHRAE standard 62–2010 on IAQ sug-
rate
gests an “air per person” and “air per square
Qp = ventilation required to control
foot” approach for determining the minimum
amount of OA to be supplied to various occu- “people” sources of air
pancies for dilution purposes, see Table 36.5. contaminants
The ASHRAE standard assumes excellent mix- Qp = ventilation required to control
ing, distribution and delivery of the outdoor “building” sources of air
air to occupants. It also assumes a certain contaminants
occupant loading. Where these are not the Rp = minimum rate of outdoor air in
case, additional OA may be required or better cfm per person
mixing and distribution provided. In cases Pd = number of people in the occupied
where definitive data are not available, the area
designer/user can use default values. Rb = minimum rate of outdoor air in
This approach recognizes that air pollu- cfm per square foot of occupied
tants also arise from non-people sources: area
building materials, furnishings, and the Ab = floor area in occupied portion of
HVAC equipment itself. However, the
the building, square feet
approach decreases the total amount of out-
door air historically required for some occu- Example 36.4. In an 2,000 sq ft office
pancies of interest to industrial hygienists. space with 14 occupants, the minimum
However, these are minimums and can be required ventilation rate to the occupied
adjusted upward as the need arises. zone can be determined using Equation 36-10.
1200 ___________________________ The Occupational Environment: Its Evaluation, Control, and Management, 3rd edition
1202 ___________________________ The Occupational Environment: Its Evaluation, Control, and Management, 3rd edition