Sie sind auf Seite 1von 15

Applied Technology and Best Practices in CEE

Conference
Budapest, 17 November 2011

Quantitative Seismic Interpretation in


Reservoir Management in Pannonian
basin

Peter Zahuczki
MOL E&P
Integrated Field Applications, 1

Geomodel Development
Role of Seismic Data in Reservoir Management

• Goal of reservoir management:

maximizing the economic value of a reservoir by optimizing


recovery of hydrocarbons while minimizing capital investments
and operating expenses

• Geological model is required to support optimal decision making


in the subsurface

• Reservoir models need to integrate all of the available


informations, and describe the associated uncertainties of the
reservoir parameters

2
Information sources in reservoir modeling

3
Role of Seismic Data in Reservoir Management

 Seismic technology is the only one which


can image the subsurface in 3D

 The high fidelity acquisition and modern


processing technology allow of the
extraction of reservoir parameters directly
from seismic data

4
Use of seismic data can save costs by minimizing dry holes and poor
producers, by contributing to the proper sizing and design of facilities
via reservoir simulation

• Provide the most reliable reservoir geometry

• Constrain the reservoir parameter estimation

5
Sweet spot mapping in an unconventional tight sand by
extended elastic impedance inversion

CASE HISTOTY

6
Reservoir Settings

 Miocene tight sandstones

 Deep HPHT environment

 Early development phase


• 2 existing well

 Aim:
• Mapping the possible „sweet spots” to identify new well
locations for further development

7
Well Tie
Vp Vs Rho AI GI Near stack
(m/s) (m/s) (g/cc)

8
Acoustic Impedance vs. Porosity

Porosity (%)

Acoustic Impedance alone is not able to predict high porosity-


low SW zones

Acoustic Impedance (m/s*g/cc)


9
Extended Elastic Impedance

EEI = V p(cos χ +sin χ ) ⋅ Vs( −8 K sin χ ) ⋅ ρ (cos χ − 4 K sin χ )


tan χ = sin 2 θ
EEI (0 ) = V p ⋅ ρ = AI
0

EEI (90 ) = V p ⋅ V
0
s
−8 K
⋅ρ −4 K
= GI
2
 Vs 
K = 
V 
 p
Whitcombe et al, 2002

10
Acoustic Impedance EEI(0) vs. Gradient Impedance EEI(90)

Gradient Impedance

Sweet Spot
Zone

Acoustic Impedance
11
Impedance Inversion

Reflection Impedance

Low
Impedance

Inversion technology convert


Inversion the relative amplitudes to
absolute impredance values
High
Impedance

12
Intercept Acoustic Impedance EEI(0)

Inversion

Gradient Gradient Impedance EEI(90)

Inversion

13
Application of „sweet spot” zone from AI-GI cross-plot

High por.
Low SW
Zone

Back-
ground

14
THANK YOU FOR YOUR
ATTENTION
15

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen