1 SCRA 899 – Succession – Promise

Sometime before 1898, Simeon Blas married Marta Cruz with whom he had three children. He also
grandchildren from his children with Marta Cruz. In 1898, Marta Cruz died. In 1899, Blas married Maxima Sa
(they had no children) but the properties he and his former wife acquired during the first marriage were
liquidated.
In 1936, Simeon Blas executed a will disposing half of his properties in favor of Maxima the other half for paym
of debts, Blas also named a few devisees and legatees therein. In lieu of this, Maxima executed a docum
whereby she intimated that she understands the will of her husband; that she promises that she’ll be giving, u
her death, one-half of the properties she’ll be acquiring to the heirs and legatees named in the will of his husb
that she can select or choose any of them depending upon the respect, service, and treatment accorded to he
said legatees/heirs/devisees.
In 1937, Simeon Blas died. In 1956, Maxima died and Rosalina Santos became administratrix of her estate. In
same year, Maria Gervacio Blas, child of Simeon Blas in his first marriage, together with three other grandchil
of Simeon Blas (heirs of Simeon Blas), learned that Maxima did not fulfill her promise as it was learned
Maxima only disposed not even one-tenth of the properties she acquired from Simeon Blas.
The heirs are now contending that they did not partition Simeon Blas’ property precisely because Maxima prom
that they’ll be receiving properties upon her death.
ISSUE: Whether or not the heirs should receive properties based on the promise of Maxima.
HELD: Yes. The promise is valid and enforceable upon her death. Though it is not a will (it lacks the formality
a donation, it is still enforceable because said promise was actually executed to avoid litigation (partition of Sim
Blas’ estate) hence it is a compromise.
It is not disputed that this document was prepared at the instance of Simeon Blas for the reason that the conj
properties of his first marriage had not been liquidated. It is an obligation or promise made by the maker to tran
one-half of her share in the conjugal properties acquired with her husband, which properties are stated or decl
to be conjugal properties in the will of the husband.
Justice Bautista Angelo, dissenting:
It should be noted that Maxima Santos’ promise to transmit is predicated on the condition that she can fr
choose and select from among the heirs and legatees of her husband those to whom she would like to give
bequeath depending on the respect, service and companionship that they may render to her. Her commitme
not an absolute promise to give to all but only to whom she may choose and select. And here this promise
been substantially complied with when she disposed one-tenth of the property to some legatees name
Simeon’s will.