Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2/21/2018 11:06 AM
JOHN F. WARREN
COUNTY CLERK
DALLAS COUNTY
Plaintiff, Kolby Listenbee, files this First Amended Petition against Defendants TEXAS
BIG 12 CONFERENCE, INC.; DAVID GABLE; ZACH LACROSS; DILLON SMITH; CHRIS
MEACHAM; and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, and alleges as follows:
DISCOVERY-CONTROL PLAN
Procedure 190.4 and affirmatively pleads that this suit is not governed by the expedited-actions
process in Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 169 because Plaintiff requests injunctive relief, Plaintiff
2. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 47, Plaintiff seeks monetary relief over
$1,000,000.
PARTIES
registered office is located in Tarrant County, Texas. Defendant TCU may be served with process
by serving its registered agent for service of process, Victor Boschini Jr., 2800 South University
business that does business in Tarrant County, Texas. Defendant TCU Board may be served with
process by serving its chairman, Mark L. Johnson, at 2800 South University Dr., Fort Worth, Texas
76129.
registered office is located in Dallas County, Texas. Defendant Big 12 may be served with process
by serving its Commissioner, Bob Bowlsby, at 400 East John Carpenter Freeway, Irving, Texas
75062.
County, Texas. Gable may be served with process at TCU, 2900 Stadium Dr., Fort Worth, TX
76129.
Tarrant County, Texas. LaCross may be served with process at TCU, 2900 Stadium Dr., Fort
Worth, TX 76129.
Tarrant County, Texas. Smith may be served with process at TCU, 2900 Stadium Dr., Fort Worth,
TX 76129.
10. Defendant Chris Del Conte (“Del Conte”) is an individual who resides in Fort
Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. Smith may be served with process at TCU, 2900 Stadium Dr., Fort
Worth, TX 76129.
11. Defendant Gary Patterson (“Patterson”) is an individual who resides in Fort Worth,
Tarrant County, Texas. Patterson may be served with process at TCU, 2900 Stadium Dr., Fort
Worth, TX 76129.
12. Defendant James Russell “Rusty” Burns (“Burns”) is an individual who resides in
Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. Burns may be served with process at TCU, 2900 Stadium Dr.,
Lawrence, Douglas County, Kansas. Meacham may be served with process at Kansas University,
Anderson Family Football Complex, 1146 Maine St., Lawrence, Kansas 66045.
14. Defendant John and Jane Does 1 – 10 are unknown Defendants who may be
JURISDICTION
15. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the lawsuit because the amount in
controversy exceeds this Court’s minimum jurisdictional requirements. This case cannot be
removed to federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b) because multiple defendants are forum
defendants.
16. Venue is proper in Dallas County pursuant to Texas Civil Practices & Remedies
Code Section 15 because Dallas County is the county of Defendant Big 12’s principal office in
FACTS
A. Background on Defendants
17. Upon information and belief, the following is known about the named Defendants
in this action:
18. Plaintiff Kolby Listenbee, born on January 25, 1994, is a life-long resident of
Tarrant County. Kolby attended Bowie High School in Arlington, Texas where he played
quarterback for the high school football team. In or around 2011, Kolby committed to Defendant
Texas Christian University to play college football. Kolby received a full scholarship to attend
19. In his freshman year, 2012, Kolby transferred from the quarterback position to wide
receiver. Kolby struggled to learn the new position that required learning new skills like running
routes and catching the ball. Kolby was unable to contribute to the team greatly because of this
position. His struggled continued into his sophomore year in 2013 as well.
20. Kolby then joined TCU’s Track and Field team his sophomore year. Kolby
competed in numerous track events, specializing in the 60m, 100m, and 200m races. Mr.
Listenbee’s speed garnered him many accolades and championships. This includes running a 6.67s
60m in 2015, a 10.04s 100m in 2015, and a 20.60s 200m in 2015. These times cemented Kolby’s
21. With the help of his track successes, Kolby became more comfortable and confident
on the football field. In his junior year, 2014, Kolby finished with 41 receptions for 753 years and
four touchdowns. Twelve of those receptions were for 30 or more yards – a feat surpassed by only
one other college wide receiver that year. 2 Kolby averaged 18.4 yards per reception which was
1
Chatmon, Brandon, Track triumphs spark TCU's Kolby Listenbee to gridiron success, September 2, 2015;
http://www.espn.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/102836/track-triumphs-spark-tcus-kolby-listenbee-to-gridiron-success
2
Id.
on a national level. Several articles 3 were written on Kolby and his potential to be a huge star in
23. In his senior year, Kolby played the first two games of the season and picked up
right where he left off his junior year. He caught 7 passes for 151 yards and 1 touchdown
contributing in wins against the University of Minnesota and Stephen F. Austin University. 4
24. On September 19, 2015, the TCU football team played the Southern Methodist
University football team in Fort Worth, Texas. Kolby started the game, as he had done in the two
previous games. Kolby played the entire first half of the game and started the third quarter.
25. At the 13-minute mark in the third quarter, TCU began a long drive downfield. The
score was 28-17 with TCU prevailing. TCU’s offense was on SMU’s 31-yard line and looked to
score. Defendant Patterson called for a passing play on 1st down and 10 yards to go. TCU’s
quarterback passed the ball to Kolby who caught the ball in the end zone. See, Figure 1. Kolby
landed awkwardly while still holding on to the ball. See, Figure 2 and 3. This catch gave TCU
3
Id; http://www.star-telegram.com/sports/college/big-12/texas-christian-university/article30618720.html
4
Individual Receiving Statistics for 2015 TCU Football Season; http://www.gofrogs.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/2015-
2016/indgbg.html
sideline, the pain in Kolby’s pelvic area caused him to fall to the ground. See, Figure 4.
his lower back. See, Figure 5. Kolby was in too much pain to return to the game.
28. After the SMU game, Kolby was seen by Dr. Michelle Kirk at the TCU Sports
Medicine facility on TCU campus. Dr. Kirk diagnosed Kolby with osteitis pubis, pain in right
groin, and status post football injury on September 19, 2015. Dr. Kirk referred Kolby for a pelvic
at Touchstone Imaging in Fort Worth, Texas. Dr. Naveed Khan interpreted the study and stated
that Kolby suffered osteitis pubis with marrow edema and possible grade 1 strain of his obturator
muscles bilaterally.
30. Prior to September 19, 2015, Kolby had never sustained injuries to his pelvic
region.
31. Osteitis Pubis is an inflammation of the pubic symphysis (the cartilage that unites
weeks until the athlete is pain-free or has minimal pain and then light rehabilitation. If rest and
rehabilitation do not ameliorate the athlete’s condition, then corticosteroid therapy may be
considered.
5
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/87420-overview
can result in atrophy of the surrounding tissues especially with frequent administration or excessive
34. In fact, the NCAA Sports Medicine Handbook 6 specifically recommends that:
35. Local anesthetics are also commonly used to treat athletes with osteitis pubis for
the pain the condition exudes. The NCAA Sports Medicine Handbook 7 specifically recommends
that:
6
2014-2015 NCAA Sports Medicine Handbook, Guideline 2N, Injectable Corticosteroids in Sports Injuries
7
2014-2015 NCAA Sports Medicine Handbook, Guideline 2M, The Use of Local Anesthetics
37. After his diagnosis of osteitis pubis, Kolby was instructed by Athletic Trainer David
Gable to immediately begin rehabilitation. Kolby relied on Defendant Gable’s expertise in the
field and began his rehabilitation of his hip the day after his injury.
38. On September 26, 2015, TCU football played a game against Texas Tech
University. Kolby did not play in the game. The next week, on October 3, 2015, TCU football
played a game against The University of Texas. Kolby also did not play in this game. TCU won
both games. Before and after the Texas Tech game, TCU football was ranked fourth in the nation.
After the University of Texas game, TCU football jumped up to second in the nation.
39. Between September 19, 2015 and October 3, 2015, a span of 14 days, Kolby
refrained from playing football games but was forced to practice and undergo rehabilitation.
40. On or around October 4, 2015, Kolby was examined by Dr. Kirk, Dr. Jason
Mogonye (another team doctor), Gable, LaCross, and Smith to determine his ability to return to
play. Kolby informed Defendants that he was still in pain. Despite his assertions, Kolby was
cleared by Defendants to practice with the team. Final clearance to return to play was given by
Defendant Patterson – the head coach of the TCU football team, Defendant Meacham – the
41. On October 10, 2015, Kolby played in his first game since the injury against Kansas
State University. Kolby, still in immense pain and with limited mobility, had zero catches for zero
yards and zero touchdowns. Defendant Patterson called Kolby’s performance “average.” 8
8
http://dev.rotoworld.com/recent/cfb/133231/kolby-listenbee
for Defendant TCU. It was evident that Kolby’s production suffered due to his injury. The chart
below illustrates Kolby’s statistics for each game following his injury on September 19, 2015.
43. Throughout the remainder of the season, Kolby received injections of local
anesthetics and corticosteroids from Drs. Kirk and/or Mogonye – TCU football’s team physicians.
These injections were given before the games and sometimes at halftime depending on Kolby’s
pain level. Kolby received an average of three injections per game before kickoff. Defendants
Gable, LaCross, and Smith (the Athletic Trainers) and Defendants Patterson, Meacham, and Burns
44. In his very last game at TCU, Kolby started in the Valero Alamo Bowl versus the
University of Oregon. At halftime, Kolby complained to Dr. Mogonye that his pelvis was in
immense pain once again. Dr. Mogonye injected Kolby with anesthetic as he had done during
halftime of several other previous games. This time, however, Dr. Mogonye inadvertently injected
the anesthetic into Kolby’s femoral artery. Kolby immediately became paralyzed from the waist
down. When he tried to stand up and walk, Kolby collapsed on the locker room floor. It was
evident Kolby was not going to play the second half of his last ever bowl game. Now the question
was whether Kolby would even be able to watch the remainder of the game. Kolby was given a
teammates onto the sidelines. Kolby watched the rest of the game in that seat unable to walk.
45. Between September 19, 2015 and October 3, 2015, Kolby faced tremendous
pressure to return to play despite his pain and his condition. These pressures came directly and
indirectly from Defendants Patterson, Gable, LaCross, Smith, Meacham, and Burns.
46. The first time Kolby was pressured was during the game Kolby was originally
injured in. Kolby landed awkwardly, limped off the field, and was then subsequently carried on
the sidelines by teammates to the Athletic Trainers’ table. As he was carried off, Defendant
Patterson congratulated Kolby on the touchdown. Defendant Gable stood near Kolby while he
received a massage on the table. Defendant Gable informed Defendants Patterson, Meacham, and
Burns that Kolby was in significant pain. Despite this knowledge and seeing Kolby being carried
by teammates, Defendants Patterson, Meacham, and Burns personally told Kolby “to get back out
on the field.” Kolby refused as he was barely able to walk. Defendant Patterson was visibly upset
by Kolby’s decision.
47. After the game and for the next two weeks, Defendants Patterson, Meacham, and
Burns continually harassed, humiliated, pressured, and threatened Kolby to return to play. On
numerous occasions, the aforementioned Defendants made fun of Kolby’s injury by telling him,
in front of the entire TCU football team, that Kolby was “faking it” and that he was “soft.” The
coaching Defendants would tell Kolby’s teammates who were also injured that Kolby is only
“saying he was injured because ‘misery loves company.’” The Defendants would also verbally
48. On the way to the September 26, 2015 game against Texas Tech University,
Defendant Patterson forced Kolby to sit in a different airplane seat than the one Kolby typically
sits. The football team allowed starting seniors to sit in the first-class section while the remainder
of the team had to sit in coach class. Defendant Patterson forced Kolby to switch seats with the
third string quarterback and sit in coach class. The humiliating incident occurred in front of the
entire team.
49. A few days prior to the October 3, 2015 game versus the University of Texas
Longhorns, Defendant Patterson told Kolby that if TCU was to lose to Texas then Kolby would
not only be dismissed from the TCU football team, but also from TCU itself.
50. Kolby was told on numerous occasions that if he did not return to play it would be
“next man up” and that his position as wide receiver would be given to the next player on the
roster.
51. On October 8, 2015, Defendant Patterson purposely told news reporters that he
believed the football team was actually better when Kolby was not playing. 9 Kolby took this as
an affront to his abilities and even more pressure to attempt to return to play despite not being
ready.
52. Most importantly to Kolby, Defendants Patterson, Meacham, and Burns informed
Kolby that if he did not return to play soon then they would begin to tell NFL scouts that he was
not tough enough for the professional level and/or he was faking his injury.
9
http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/story/tcu-horned-frogs-gary-patterson-kobly-listenbee-better-without-
100815
was at risk. Consequently, Kolby also believed his professional career would be at risk if he was
54. Due to this pressure and relying on Defendants Patterson, Gable, LaCross, Smith,
Meacham, and Burns’ assurances that he was clear to play, Kolby returned to the football field
55. The continuous injections numbed Kolby’s pain in his pelvic area allowing him to
practice with the team and take the field each Saturday for games. Without his knowledge, the
injections, specifically the corticosteroids, were deteriorating Kolby’s cartilage, muscles, and the
56. Defendant TCU is a Division 1 NCAA university. Its football team is a perennial
57. Defendant Big 12 is one of the top major collegiate conferences whose members
58. Upon information and belief, despite being on higher education’s biggest stage,
Defendants TCU and Big 12 lack policies, procedures, and protocols that are crucial for the health
59. Upon information and belief, these policies, procedures, and protocols include
safeguards against the immense pressure the student athletes receive from their team’s coaching
staff about return to play. The athletes are unable to voice their opposition to returning to play
procedures, and protocols regarding the medical clearance to return to play as it relates to
61. Upon information and belief, all policies, procedures, and protocols are called for
and approved by Defendants Big 12, TCU, TCU Board, and Athletic Director Chris Del Conte.
62. Upon information and belief, the TCU football team implemented a system in
which a pattern of verbal abuse, pressure to return to play despite serious injuries, and negligent
63. This system was created by Defendant Patterson, supported by Defendants TCU,
TCU Board of Trustees, and Del Conte, and orchestrated by Defendants Meacham, Burns, Gable,
Listenbee enrolling at TCU and during his time at TCU. They are as follows:
Defendant Patterson verbally accosting then Team Physician Dr. Samuel Haraldson
c. In another incident, in the 2011 season, former TCU football player, David
Johnson, sprained his ankle. Johnson was administered pain medication and had his ankle
wrapped with lots of tape. When Johnson expressed worry to his position coach about not
being able to play because of his ankle, the position coach stated that “in your career, you
will never play at 100%. You will always be hurt. And if you can’t do that, we don’t have
a place for you here.” That player noticed that this became a “common thread [at TCU] –
players being informed by coaches that ‘if you don’t play this year, we have no use for you.
e. Johnson was involved in another incident before the 2013 season began. During a
pre-season practice, Johnson felt his twice-repaired knee “shift” and immediately started
limping. Fearing that he may have torn his ACL once again, Johnson removed himself
from the practice and went to the sidelines. He informed the trainers of his issue and was
told that he would be examined after the practice. Johnson stood on the sidelines and
continued to watch the practice in support of his teammates. Johnson stood in the back,
10
The first time Johnson injured his ACL, he was on the sidelines and a player on the field collided into him.
11
Johnson states that it was “a known fact that throughout the TCU program, voiced by [Defendant] Patterson himself,
that if you go against his will in your intentions to stay with or leave the program, he will make it intentionally difficult
for you to leave or gain a place [at] a new school. ..Patterson often would allege that he wouldn’t release you from
your ‘contract’ and would bad mouth you to other schools – tell the coaches there that you were lazy, don’t work hard,
and were not tough.”
football players in hopes that such manipulation would pressure the player to return to the field
before being fully healed and despite not fully understanding the severity of the damage the player
may suffer if he returned to play. This manipulative system was well known to Defendant TCU,
66. In addition, upon information and belief, the TCU football coaches prefer to keep
the diagnosing and treating of their players “in house” with the TCU team physicians. In other
words, it is only on the rare occasion that an outside specialist would be consulted. For example,
an orthopedist for a serious injury like osteitis pubis. The coaches believe that the team physicians
can be easily manipulated to clear their players to return to play while an outside physician could
not be swayed as easily. This is evidenced by TCU’s lack of an orthopedic physician on staff nor
any radiology equipment on campus – unlike other top tier schools across the nation that have the
resources TCU has. The systematic scheme allows injured players to receive subpar treatment for
their serious injuries, gives the coaches premature return-to-play decision when serious injury or
is now engaged to be married to Head Team Physician, Dr. Michele Kirk. This relationship, which
was never disclosed to Plaintiff or any other TCU athlete, is a significant conflict of interest at
TCU. At TCU, the head team physician, who is the student-athlete’s last line of defense, is in a
personal relationship with the head Athletic Trainer, who works at the behest of the coaching staff
who simply want their players to return to competition from injury regardless of the long-term
implications. Failing to disclose this romantic relationship to the players is a significant lack of
informed consent.
68. Defendant Big 12 knew or should have known of TCU’s systematic misconduct of
its student-athletes but did nothing to prevent it or stop it once implemented. Defendant Big XII
failed to monitor, supervise, and/or audit TCU’s policies of student-athlete return-to-play clearance
69. After the 2015 football season, Kolby graduated from TCU in December 2015.
70. Kolby attempted to pursue his dream of becoming a professional football player in
71. In February 2016, Kolby attended the NFL Combine in Indianapolis, Indiana. He
participated in the 40-yard dash where he posted the second fastest time that year at 4.39 seconds.
72. In March 2016, Kolby underwent surgery to repair two sports hernias he developed
due to the injections administered to him after his September 19, 2015 injury.
73. In April 2016, Kolby was selected in the 6th Round by the Buffalo Bills – a
$2,472,932.
75. Despite practicing with the Bills, the team placed Kolby on the non-football injury
76. Kolby was never able to play in the NFL due to his pelvic instability. In December
2016, Kolby underwent surgery to repair his pubic symphysis. A metal plate was placed in the
area to fuse his pelvic bones together. Kolby also had repairs made to his previous hernias.
77. Despite hard work and extensive rehabilitation throughout the 2016-2017 season,
Kolby was unable to play football. In June 2017, the Buffalo Bills waived Kolby.
78. Since June 2017, Kolby has visited with several NFL teams in hopes of landing a
spot on a professional roster which would mitigate his damages. Unfortunately, as the season
79. Towards the end of the season, Kolby was invited to join the practice squad of the
Miami Dolphins professional football team. Kolby accepted and played on their practice squad
for several weeks. Kolby was then released by Miami on December 5, 2017.
80. Shortly thereafter Kolby signed on to the practice squad for the Indianapolis Colts.
Kolby signed a reserve/futures contract with the Colts on January 1, 2018. A reserve/futures
contract is non-guaranteed, and the salary is only paid if Kolby makes the team.
K. Kolby’s Damages
81. As a result of Defendants’ actions and/or omissions, Kolby suffered past and future
damages, including, past and future medical expenses, past and future lost wages and/or loss of
earning capacity, past and future pain and suffering past and future mental anguish, past and future
physical disfigurement, past and future physical impairment, and past and future aggravation of
preexisting condition.
in value and losses in profits, including, but not limited to NFL career earnings, track & field
83. In addition, Plaintiff’s injury resulted from Defendants’ gross negligence, malice,
or fraud, which entitles Plaintiff to exemplary damages under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies
84. In addition, Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable and necessary attorney fees.
85. Plaintiff seeks unliquidated damages within the jurisdictional limits of this
86. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all prior allegations as though set forth herein.
87. Defendants owed a legal duty to Plaintiff. Defendants owed a duty to Plaintiff as
the school and conference of higher education in which Plaintiff agreed to receive his education
from and played for on the football field. Defendants owed a duty to possess and apply the
knowledge and to use the skill and care that is used by a reasonable and prudent educational
institution/conference in the same or similar circumstances. Defendants also owed a fiduciary duty
to Plaintiff.
88. Defendants breached its duties and were negligent as it relates to the incident in
question. Defendants’ negligence, errors, acts, and omissions include, but are not limited to:
90. Defendants’ breach of duty proximately caused injury to Plaintiff, which resulted
in Plaintiff suffering past and future damages, including, past and future medical expenses, past
and future lost wages and/or loss of earning capacity, past and future pain and suffering past and
future mental anguish, past and future physical disfigurement, past and future physical impairment,
91. Plaintiff seeks unliquidated damages within the jurisdictional limits of this court.
92. Plaintiff’s injury resulted from Defendants’ gross negligence, which entitles
Plaintiff to exemplary damages under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code section 41.003(a).
93. All injuries suffered by Plaintiff relating to this incident, past, present and future,
were due to the negligence and gross negligence of the Defendants, without any contributing
94. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all prior allegations as though set forth herein.
95. Defendants employed Team Physicians Dr. Karen Michele Kirk and Dr. Jason
Mogonye as well as Defendants David Gable, Zach LaCross, Dillon Smith, James Russell Burns,
Douglas Meacham, Gary Patterson, and Chris Del Conte during the incident in question.
96. The aforementioned individuals were unqualified to handle their duties and
97. Defendants knew or should have known that hiring and retaining the
aforementioned individuals would create an unreasonable risk of injury to members of their student
athlete body.
98. Defendants failed to use ordinary care in hiring, retaining, supervising, training,
the aforementioned individuals was the proximate cause of Plaintiff’s injury and damages.
100. Defendants’ actions and/or omissions were with conscious indifference, malicious,
101. Defendants’ actions and/or omissions proximately caused injury to Plaintiff, which
resulted in Plaintiff suffering past and future damages, including, past and future medical expenses,
past and future lost wages and/or loss of earning capacity, past and future pain and suffering past
and future mental anguish, past and future physical disfigurement, past and future physical
102. Plaintiff seeks unliquidated damages within the jurisdictional limits of this court.
Plaintiff to exemplary damages under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code section 41.003(a).
104. All injuries suffered by Plaintiff relating to this incident, past, present and future,
were due to the negligence and gross negligence of the Defendants, without any contributing
105. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all prior allegations as though set forth herein.
107. Defendants made the representations in the course of Defendants’ business and in
the course of a transaction in which Defendants had an interest – recruiting Plaintiff for the school’s
football team.
110. Defendants’ actions and/or omissions were with conscious indifference, malicious,
resulted in Plaintiff suffering past and future damages, including, past and future medical expenses,
past and future lost wages and/or loss of earning capacity, past and future pain and suffering past
and future mental anguish, past and future physical disfigurement, past and future physical
112. Plaintiff seeks unliquidated damages within the jurisdictional limits of this court.
113. Plaintiff’s injury resulted from Defendants’ gross negligence, which entitles
Plaintiff to exemplary damages under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code section 41.003(a).
114. All injuries suffered by Plaintiff relating to this incident, past, present and future,
were due to the negligence and gross negligence of the Defendants, without any contributing
115. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all prior allegations as though set forth herein.
116. Defendants directly and proximately caused the injuries and damages suffered by
Plaintiff.
117. It was Defendants’ responsibility to properly care for and treat Plaintiff.
118. That the events causing the injuries and damages to Plaintiff were of a kind which
119. Thus, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable as a theory of negligence,
120. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all prior allegations as though set forth herein.
122. Defendants’ conduct, as described above, during the incident in question was
125. Plaintiff’s severe emotional distress cannot be remedied by any other cause of
action.
Plaintiff suffering past and future damages, including, past and future medical expenses, past and
future lost wages and/or loss of earning capacity, past and future pain and suffering past and future
mental anguish, past and future physical disfigurement, past and future physical impairment, and
127. Plaintiff seeks unliquidated damages within the jurisdictional limits of this court.
128. Plaintiff’s injury resulted from Defendants’ conduct, which entitles Plaintiff to
exemplary damages under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code section 41.003(a).
129. All injuries suffered by Plaintiff relating to this incident, past, present and future,
were due to the negligence and gross negligence of the Defendants, without any contributing
130. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all prior allegations as though set forth herein.
132. Defendants’ representations to Plaintiff were material because the statements were
important to Plaintiff in making his decision to attend Defendants’ school and play for Defendants’
knew (1) to be false, (2) to be based on false facts, and/or (3) Plaintiff would justifiably rely on
134. Defendants made the false representations knowing they were false.
135. Defendants made the false representations recklessly, as a positive assertion, and
136. Defendants either intended for Plaintiff to rely on these false representations or had
137. Plaintiff justifiably relied on Defendants’ false representation when Plaintiff agreed
resulted in Plaintiff suffering past and future damages, including, past and future medical expenses,
past and future lost wages and/or loss of earning capacity, past and future pain and suffering past
139. Plaintiff seeks unliquidated damages within the jurisdictional limits of this court.
140. Plaintiff’s injury resulted from Defendants’ fraudulent conduct, which entitles
Plaintiff to exemplary damages under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code section 41.003(a).
141. All injuries suffered by Plaintiff relating to this incident, past, present and future,
were due to the fraudulent conduct of the Defendants, without any contributing negligence on the
142. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all prior allegations as though set forth herein.
143. The acts and/or omissions of Team Physicians Dr. Karen Michele Kirk and Dr.
Jason Mogonye as well as Defendants David Gable, Zach LaCross, Dillon Smith, James Russell
Burns, Gary Patterson, and Chris Del Conte, were performed while in the employment of
Defendants, TCU and TCU Board, and were within the course and scope of that employment or
144. As such, Defendants TCU and TCU Board are vicariously liable for the negligence
and gross negligence of the aforementioned individuals under the doctrine of respondeat superior.
145. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all prior allegations as though set forth herein.
146. At the time of the incident in question, Defendants either (1) intentionally granted
Kirk and Mogonye the authority to act on Defendants’ behalf, (2) intentionally allowed Plaintiff
and other student athletes to believe that Kirk and Mogonye had authority to act on Defendants’
147. Defendants held out Kirk and Mogonye as having the authority to act on
e. Providing Kirk and Mogonye with official identification badges for security
access to Defendants’ football stadium;
f. Providing Kirk and Mogonye with access to Plaintiff and other student
athletes before, during, and after football games, including during practices;
g. Expressing that Kirk and Mogonye were the football team’s “team
physicians” on Defendants’ website, See, Figure 7. 12
12
http://www.gofrogs.com/school-bio/tcu-medicine.html
148. At the time of the incident in question, Kirk and Mogonye were acting within the
scope of the authority granted by Defendants when they negligently treated Plaintiff.
149. Due to Defendants’ conduct, Plaintiff reasonably believed that Kirk and Mogonye
had the authority to act on the Defendants’ behalf. A reasonably prudent person, using diligence
and discretion in light of the Defendants’ conduct, would naturally and reasonably suppose that
and gross negligence of the aforementioned team physicians under the doctrine of actual or
apparent authority.
152. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all prior allegations as though set forth herein.
154. Defendants owed a legal duty to Plaintiff to possess and apply the knowledge and
to use the skill and care that is used by reasonable and prudent healthcare practitioners in the same
or similar circumstances.
155. Defendants breached its duties and were negligent as it relates to the incident in
question. Defendants’ negligence, errors, acts, and omissions include, but are not limited to:
157. Defendants’ breach of duty proximately caused injury to Plaintiff, which resulted
in Plaintiff suffering past and future damages, including, past and future medical expenses, past
and future lost wages and/or loss of earning capacity, past and future pain and suffering past and
future mental anguish, past and future physical disfigurement, past and future physical impairment,
158. Plaintiff seeks unliquidated damages within the jurisdictional limits of this court.
159. Plaintiff’s injury resulted from Defendants’ gross negligence, which entitles
Plaintiff to exemplary damages under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code section 41.003(a).
160. All injuries suffered by Plaintiff relating to this incident, past, present and future,
were due to the negligence and gross negligence of the Defendants, without any contributing
161. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all prior allegations as though set forth herein.
163. Defendants made the representations in the course of Defendants’ business and in
166. Defendants’ actions and/or omissions were with conscious indifference, malicious,
resulted in Plaintiff suffering past and future damages, including, past and future medical expenses,
past and future lost wages and/or loss of earning capacity, past and future pain and suffering past
and future mental anguish, past and future physical disfigurement, past and future physical
168. Plaintiff seeks unliquidated damages within the jurisdictional limits of this court.
Plaintiff to exemplary damages under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code section 41.003(a).
170. All injuries suffered by Plaintiff relating to this incident, past, present and future,
were due to the negligence and gross negligence of the Defendants, without any contributing
171. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all prior allegations as though set forth herein.
172. Defendants directly and proximately caused the injuries and damages suffered by
Plaintiff.
173. It was Defendants’ responsibility to properly care for and treat Plaintiff.
174. That the events causing the injuries and damages to Plaintiff were of a kind which
175. Thus, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable as a theory of negligence,
176. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all prior allegations as though set forth herein.
178. Defendants’ conduct, as described above, during the incident in question was
action.
Plaintiff suffering past and future damages, including, past and future medical expenses, past and
future lost wages and/or loss of earning capacity, past and future pain and suffering past and future
mental anguish, past and future physical disfigurement, past and future physical impairment, and
183. Plaintiff seeks unliquidated damages within the jurisdictional limits of this court.
184. Plaintiff’s injury resulted from Defendants’ conduct, which entitles Plaintiff to
exemplary damages under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code section 41.003(a).
185. All injuries suffered by Plaintiff relating to this incident, past, present and future,
were due to the negligence and gross negligence of the Defendants, without any contributing
a student athlete and Defendants were the team physicians assigned to and that treated Plaintiff.
187. Before obtaining Plaintiff’s consent for the treatment plan they implemented for
Kolby’s condition, Defendants did not properly inform Plaintiff of the inherent risks and hazards
associated with such plan. Specifically, Defendants did not inform Plaintiff of the risks and
hazards associated with the use of corticosteroids and local anesthetics nor inform Plaintiff of the
risks and long term implications of returning to play before Plaintiff’s condition had completed
healed.
pelvic area, including the cartilage, bone, muscle, and tissue deteriorated due to Defendants’
actions and/or omissions, including, but not limited to the continuous use of corticosteroids and
189. A reasonable person would have refused the treatment plan if the risks and hazards
Plaintiff suffering past and future damages, including, past and future medical expenses, past and
future lost wages and/or loss of earning capacity, past and future pain and suffering past and future
mental anguish, past and future physical disfigurement, past and future physical impairment, and
191. Plaintiff seeks unliquidated damages within the jurisdictional limits of this court.
192. Plaintiff’s injury resulted from Defendants’ conduct, which entitles Plaintiff to
exemplary damages under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code section 41.003(a).
193. All injuries suffered by Plaintiff relating to this incident, past, present and future,
were due to the negligence and gross negligence of the Defendants, without any contributing
194. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all prior allegations as though set forth herein.
196. Defendants’ representations to Plaintiff were material because the statements were
important to Plaintiff in making his decision to allow Defendants to implement their proposed
knew (1) to be false, (2) to be based on false facts, and/or (3) Plaintiff would justifiably rely on
198. Defendants made the false representations knowing they were false.
199. Defendants made the false representations recklessly, as a positive assertion, and
200. Defendants either intended for Plaintiff to rely on these false representations or had
201. Plaintiff justifiably relied on Defendants’ false representation when Plaintiff agreed
resulted in Plaintiff suffering past and future damages, including, past and future medical expenses,
past and future lost wages and/or loss of earning capacity, past and future pain and suffering past
and future mental anguish, past and future physical disfigurement, past and future physical
203. Plaintiff seeks unliquidated damages within the jurisdictional limits of this court.
204. Plaintiff’s injury resulted from Defendants’ fraudulent conduct, which entitles
Plaintiff to exemplary damages under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code section 41.003(a).
were due to the fraudulent conduct of the Defendants, without any contributing negligence on the
206. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all prior allegations as though set forth herein.
207. Defendants concealed and/or failed to disclose material facts relating to the
208. Defendants had a duty to disclose the information to Plaintiff because Defendants
had a fiduciary duty to do so as well as a duty pursuant to their physician-patient relationship with
Plaintiff.
209. The information concealed or not disclosed was material because it affected
Plaintiff’s health, well-being, and future. Specifically, Defendants concealed or did not disclose
information that the continuous injections given to Plaintiff would deteriorate his pelvic area
causing him great harm. Defendants also concealed or did not disclose information that Plaintiff
was not fully healed at the time they cleared him to return to play.
210. Defendants knew Plaintiff was ignorant of the information and did not have an
211. Defendants deliberately remained silent and did not disclose the information to
Plaintiff.
212. By deliberately remaining silent, Defendants intended for Plaintiff to act without
the information.
which resulted in Plaintiff suffering past and future damages, including, past and future medical
expenses, past and future lost wages and/or loss of earning capacity, past and future pain and
suffering past and future mental anguish, past and future physical disfigurement, past and future
215. Plaintiff seeks unliquidated damages within the jurisdictional limits of this court.
216. Plaintiff’s injury resulted from Defendants’ conduct, which entitles Plaintiff to
exemplary damages under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code section 41.003(a).
217. All injuries suffered by Plaintiff relating to this incident, past, present and future,
were due to the negligence and gross negligence of the Defendants, without any contributing
218. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all prior allegations as though set forth herein.
219. Defendants owed a legal duty to Plaintiff. Defendants owed a duty to Plaintiff as
the head coach and assistant coach of the TCU football team during the incident in question.
Defendants owed a duty to possess and apply the knowledge and to use the skill and care that is
used by a reasonable and prudent football coach in the same or similar circumstances. Defendants
220. Defendants breached its duties and were negligent as it relates to the incident in
question. Defendants’ negligence, errors, acts, and omissions include, but are not limited to:
d. negligently lacking the protective equipment necessary for football players who
returned to play after being treated for the injury Plaintiff suffered;
222. Defendants’ breach of duty proximately caused injury to Plaintiff, which resulted
in Plaintiff suffering past and future damages, including, past and future medical expenses, past
and future lost wages and/or loss of earning capacity, past and future pain and suffering past and
future mental anguish, past and future physical disfigurement, past and future physical impairment,
223. Plaintiff seeks unliquidated damages within the jurisdictional limits of this court.
224. Plaintiff’s injury resulted from Defendants’ gross negligence, which entitles
Plaintiff to exemplary damages under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code section 41.003(a).
were due to the negligence and gross negligence of the Defendants, without any contributing
226. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all prior allegations as though set forth herein.
227. Defendants decided that Team Physicians Dr. Karen Michele Kirk and Dr. Jason
Mogonye as well as Defendants David Gable, Zach LaCross, and Dillon Smith, should be
employed by Defendant TCU for the benefit of the TCU football team.
228. Team Physicians Dr. Karen Michele Kirk and Dr. Jason Mogonye as well as
Defendants David Gable, Zach LaCross, and Dillon Smith were unqualified to handle their duties
229. Defendants knew or should have known that hiring and retaining the
aforementioned individuals would create an unreasonable risk of injury to members of their student
athlete body.
230. Defendants failed to use ordinary care in hiring, retaining, supervising, training,
231. Defendants’ negligence in hiring, retaining, supervising, training, and managing the
aforementioned individuals was the proximate cause of Plaintiff’s injury and damages.
232. Defendants’ actions and/or omissions were with conscious indifference, malicious,
233. Defendants’ actions and/or omissions proximately caused injury to Plaintiff, which
resulted in Plaintiff suffering past and future damages, including, past and future medical expenses,
and future mental anguish, past and future physical disfigurement, past and future physical
234. Plaintiff seeks unliquidated damages within the jurisdictional limits of this court.
235. Plaintiff’s injury resulted from Defendants’ gross negligence, which entitles
Plaintiff to exemplary damages under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code section 41.003(a).
236. All injuries suffered by Plaintiff relating to this incident, past, present and future,
were due to the negligence and gross negligence of the Defendants, without any contributing
237. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all prior allegations as though set forth herein.
239. Defendants made the representations in the course of Defendants’ business and in
the course of a transaction in which Defendants had an interest – recruiting Plaintiff for the school’s
football team.
242. Defendants’ actions and/or omissions were with conscious indifference, malicious,
resulted in Plaintiff suffering past and future damages, including, past and future medical expenses,
past and future lost wages and/or loss of earning capacity, past and future pain and suffering past
and future mental anguish, past and future physical disfigurement, past and future physical
244. Plaintiff seeks unliquidated damages within the jurisdictional limits of this court.
245. Plaintiff’s injury resulted from Defendants’ gross negligence, which entitles
Plaintiff to exemplary damages under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code section 41.003(a).
246. All injuries suffered by Plaintiff relating to this incident, past, present and future,
were due to the negligence and gross negligence of the Defendants, without any contributing
247. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all prior allegations as though set forth herein.
248. Defendants directly and proximately caused the injuries and damages suffered by
Plaintiff.
249. It was Defendants’ responsibility to properly care for and treat Plaintiff.
250. That the events causing the injuries and damages to Plaintiff were of a kind which
252. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all prior allegations as though set forth herein.
254. Defendants’ conduct, as described above, during the incident in question was
257. Plaintiff’s severe emotional distress cannot be remedied by any other cause of
action.
Plaintiff suffering past and future damages, including, past and future medical expenses, past and
future lost wages and/or loss of earning capacity, past and future pain and suffering past and future
mental anguish, past and future physical disfigurement, past and future physical impairment, and
259. Plaintiff seeks unliquidated damages within the jurisdictional limits of this court.
260. Plaintiff’s injury resulted from Defendants’ conduct, which entitles Plaintiff to
exemplary damages under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code section 41.003(a).
261. All injuries suffered by Plaintiff relating to this incident, past, present and future,
were due to the negligence and gross negligence of the Defendants, without any contributing
262. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all prior allegations as though set forth herein.
264. Defendants’ representations to Plaintiff were material because the statements were
important to Plaintiff in making his decision to attend Defendants’ school and play for Defendants’
knew (1) to be false, (2) to be based on false facts, and/or (3) Plaintiff would justifiably rely on
266. Defendants made the false representations knowing they were false.
267. Defendants made the false representations recklessly, as a positive assertion, and
268. Defendants either intended for Plaintiff to rely on these false representations or had
269. Plaintiff justifiably relied on Defendants’ false representation when Plaintiff agreed
resulted in Plaintiff suffering past and future damages, including, past and future medical expenses,
past and future lost wages and/or loss of earning capacity, past and future pain and suffering past
and future mental anguish, past and future physical disfigurement, past and future physical
271. Plaintiff seeks unliquidated damages within the jurisdictional limits of this court.
272. Plaintiff’s injury resulted from Defendants’ fraudulent conduct, which entitles
Plaintiff to exemplary damages under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code section 41.003(a).
273. All injuries suffered by Plaintiff relating to this incident, past, present and future,
were due to the fraudulent conduct of the Defendants, without any contributing negligence on the
274. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all prior allegations as though set forth herein.
275. Defendants concealed and/or failed to disclose material facts relating to the
276. Defendants had a duty to disclose the information to Plaintiff because Defendants
had a fiduciary duty to do so as well as a duty pursuant to their physician-patient relationship with
Plaintiff.
277. The information concealed or not disclosed was material because it affected
Plaintiff’s health, well-being, and future. Specifically, Defendants concealed or did not disclose
information that the continuous injections given to Plaintiff would deteriorate his pelvic area
was not fully healed at the time they cleared him to return to play.
278. Defendants knew Plaintiff was ignorant of the information and did not have an
279. Defendants deliberately remained silent and did not disclose the information to
Plaintiff.
280. By deliberately remaining silent, Defendants intended for Plaintiff to act without
the information.
which resulted in Plaintiff suffering past and future damages, including, past and future medical
expenses, past and future lost wages and/or loss of earning capacity, past and future pain and
suffering past and future mental anguish, past and future physical disfigurement, past and future
283. Plaintiff seeks unliquidated damages within the jurisdictional limits of this court.
284. Plaintiff’s injury resulted from Defendants’ conduct, which entitles Plaintiff to
exemplary damages under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code section 41.003(a).
285. All injuries suffered by Plaintiff relating to this incident, past, present and future,
were due to the negligence and gross negligence of the Defendants, without any contributing
286. Plaintiff was a student athlete and Defendants were the head coach (Patterson) and
Kolby’s condition, Defendants did not properly inform Plaintiff of the inherent risks and hazards
associated with such plan. Specifically, Defendants did not inform Plaintiff of the risks and
hazards associated with the use of corticosteroids and local anesthetics nor inform Plaintiff of the
risks and long-term implications of returning to play before Plaintiff’s condition had completed
healed.
288. Plaintiff was injured by the occurrence of an undisclosed risk. Specifically, Kolby’s
pelvic area, including the cartilage, bone, muscle, and tissue deteriorated due to Defendants’
actions and/or omissions, including, but not limited to the continuous use of corticosteroids and
289. A reasonable person would have refused the treatment plan if the risks and hazards
Plaintiff suffering past and future damages, including, past and future medical expenses, past and
future lost wages and/or loss of earning capacity, past and future pain and suffering past and future
mental anguish, past and future physical disfigurement, past and future physical impairment, and
291. Plaintiff seeks unliquidated damages within the jurisdictional limits of this court.
292. Plaintiff’s injury resulted from Defendants’ conduct, which entitles Plaintiff to
exemplary damages under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code section 41.003(a).
293. All injuries suffered by Plaintiff relating to this incident, past, present and future,
were due to the negligence and gross negligence of the Defendants, without any contributing
Plaintiff demands a jury trial and tenders the appropriate fee with this petition.
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
All conditions precedent to Plaintiff’s claim for relief have been performed or have
occurred.
Under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 194, Plaintiff requests that Defendant disclose, within
50 days of the service of this request, the information or material described in Rule 194.2.
Under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 192, Plaintiff requests that Defendant produce all
medical records in its possession pertinent to Plaintiff Kolby Listenbee, including, but not limited
PRAYER
For these reasons, Plaintiff asks that the Court issue citation for Defendants to appear and
answer, and that Plaintiff be awarded a judgment against Defendants for the following: actual
damages, exemplary damages, Prejudgment and postjudgment interest, Court costs, attorney fees,