Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ScienceDirect
Research Paper
article info
Self-compacting concrete (SCC) is characterized by deformability and segregation resis-
Article history: tance. It flows under its own weight while remaining homogeneous in composition. This
Received 16 October 2014 study presents the effect of replacing cement content with rice husk ash (RHA) as sup-
Received in revised form plementary cementitious materials (SCM's) in SCC and observing fresh flow (slump flow, V-
29 November 2014 Funnel, U-box, L-Flow), mechanical strength (compressive and split tensile) and durability
Accepted 12 December 2014 properties (porosity and rapid chloride permeability test) at 7, 28 and 56 d. Concrete
Published online 2 January 2015 specimens were prepared with 0, 10, 15 and 20% RHA replacing cement. 20% RHA
replacement showed minimum specified workability. An increase of about 25% strength at
Keywords: 7 d, 33% at 28 d and 36% at 56 d was observed with RHA content of 15% RHA when
Self-compacting concrete compared to control mix. Maximum split tensile strength was 3.8 N mm2 at 28 d and
Rice husk ash 4.0 N mm2 at 56 d for 15% RHA replacement. The inclusion of RHA as partial replacement
Strength to cement improved the strength properties and durability properties that remained within
Permeability limits up to 20% replacement. All the mixes were less porous as compared to the control
mix at all ages and showed “low range” to “very low range” chloride penetration also.
Microstructure (scanning electron microscopy, SEM and X-ray diffraction, XRD) analysis of
15% RHA replacement showed dense formation of C-S-H gel which is the root cause of the
increase in strength.
© 2014 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
* Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: divyachopra90@yahoo.co.in (D. Chopra), siddique_66@yahoo.com (R. Siddique), kunal_pau@yahoo.co.in ( Kunal).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.12.005
1537-5110/© 2014 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
b i o s y s t e m s e n g i n e e r i n g 1 3 0 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 7 2 e8 0 73
Table 1 e Basic tests conducted on ordinary Portland Table 3 e Physical properties of coarse aggregates, fine
cement. aggregates and rice husk ash.
Characteristics Values obtained Standard values Characteristic Coarse Fine Rice
IS: 8112 (1989) aggregates aggregates husk ash
Normal consistency (%) 28.2 e Size 12.5 mm max 4.75 mm max <45 mm
Initial setting time (min) 128 30 Specific gravity 2.66 2.567 e
Final setting time (min) 192 600 Total water 0.56 1.914 e
Specific gravity 3.51 e absorption (%)
Fineness 6.83 2.465 e
modulus (%)
the present research work was to ascertain the suitability of Colour e e Grey black
using Indian RHA as partial replacement for cement in
concrete.
Fig. 1 e SEM images of: a) OPC (43 Grade), b) Rice Husk Ash.
b i o s y s t e m s e n g i n e e r i n g 1 3 0 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 7 2 e8 0 75
For casting, the entire test specimen were cleaned and oiled
properly. These were securely tightened to correct dimensions 3. Results and discussion
before casting. The casting of specimens was in accordance
with IS: 516 (1959). After casting, the specimens were allowed 3.1. Fresh concrete properties
to remain in iron moulds for first 24 h at room temperature
(27 ± 2 C). After that these were demoulded and placed in the Various mixes have been designed and tested for fresh con-
water tank at room temperature for curing. The specimens crete properties. SP content varied from 0.8 to 1.5 % and w/b
were tested after 7, 28 and 56 d of curing period. ratio was varied from 0.35 to 0.45. Optimum results were ob-
tained by the mix with 1% SP and 0.41 w/b ratio. The results of
2.4. Test methods fresh properties of all self-compacting rice husk ash concrete
are included in Table 5. The table shows the properties such as
2.4.1. Fresh concrete properties slump flow, V-funnel flow time, L-box, U-box. In terms of
A concrete mix can only be classified as SCC if the require- Slump flow, all SCCs exhibited satisfactory slump flow in the
ment of all three characteristics i.e. filling ability, passing range of 550e800 mm, which is an indication of good
ability and segregation resistance are fulfilled. To fulfil these deformability. All the fresh properties of concrete values were
requirements basic tests are conducted i.e. slump flow test in good agreement to that of values given by European
and V- funnel test for filling ability, L-box and U-box for guidelines. Lowest workability was obtained by mix contain-
passing ability. All these tests were performed in accordance ing maximum percentage of RHA i.e. 20%. Workability
to the methods mentioned in EFNARC (2002). Acceptance decreased with increase in RHA content. Similar results were
criteria for SCC as per EFNARC (2002) are shown in Table 5. obtained by Memon et al. (2008) who have reported that fresh
properties were in accordance to the EFNARC (2002) range. It
2.4.2. Mechanical properties
Compressive strength (cube 150 150 150 mm) and split
tensile strength (cylinder 150 300 mm) was determined at Table 5 e Fresh concrete properties for mixes with and
without rice husk ash compared with EFNARC (2002)
the age of 7, 28 and 56 d in triplicates. They were tested ac-
results.
cording to IS: 516 (1959) and IS: 5816 (1999), respectively.
Type of test RHA (%)
2.4.3. Durability properties Range 0% 10% 15% 20%
The investigated durability properties are porosity and rapid (EFNARC, 2002)
chloride permeability. For both the test 100 200 mm cylin- Slump flow (mm) 650e800 730 700 670 600
ders were cast and sliced to 100 50 mm cylinders. Both these V- Funnel (sec) 6e12 6 8 11 13
tests were performed according to ASTM C 642 (2006) and L- Box (H2/H1) 0.8e1 1 0.9 0.8 Blocking
U-Flow (H2eH1) 0e30 5 18 25 30
ASTM C 1202 (2010), respectively for 28 d.
76 b i o s y s t e m s e n g i n e e r i n g 1 3 0 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 7 2 e8 0
was also reported that there was decrease in flow with the react with all the available silica and as a result of that, some
increase in RHA content. Safiuddin et al. (2012) reported that amount of silica was left without any chemical reaction.
all the mixes exhibits good filling and passing ability corre-
sponding to values as per EFNARC (2002). Kannan and 3.3. Split tensile strength
Ganesan (2013) reported that values for slump flow were in
the range as per EFNARC (2002) indicating good filling ability Similar trend as per compressive strength results was
but its value decreased with increase in percentage of RHA observed with split tensile strength. The highest strength is
and MK. obtained by the mix 15RHA at all ages. Figure 3 shows that the
split tensile strength increases with increase in percentage of
3.2. Compressive strength RHA up to 15% replacement and strength increased with in-
crease in curing age. There was decrease in strength for mix
The compressive strength test results of SCC mixes are shown 20RHA, but the values were still higher than control mix at all
in Fig. 2. The w/b ratio was kept constant at 0.41 for all mixes. ages. With increase in RHA content from (10e20 %) SCC mixes
With increase in RHA content from (10e20 %), SCC mixes developed splitting tensile strength values between 2.0 and
develop compressive strength between 29.0 and 32.6 MPa for 2.8 MPa for 7 d, 2.5 and 3.7 MPa for 28 d and 2.8 and 4.0 MPa for
7 d, 36.7 and 41.2 MPa for 28 d and 39.6 and 46.4 MPa for 56 d. 56 d. Similar results were reported by Rahman et al. (2014) who
Compressive strength increases with increases in the per- found that split tensile strength decreased with increases in
centage of RHA up to 15% replacement, after that the strength percentage of RHA. A 20% RHA replacement is acceptable, as
starts to decrease. The highest level of long term compressive its strength is similar to the strength of controlled mix.
strength was achieved for 15RHA which contained 15% RHA. Khadiry et al. (2014) reported that 28 d strength for RHA mix is
The results obtained are comparable to the results by Juma higher as compared to SL.
et al. (2012) who reported that cement replaced with RHA
significantly increased the compressive strength of concretes 3.4. Rapid chloride permeability test
at all the ages. Kannan and Ganesan (2013) reported that
compressive strength of SCC blended with 15% RHA was The 28-day test results for the resistance to penetration of
higher than that of normal SCC. However, it decreased with chloride ions into concrete, measured in terms of the electric
increase in percentage of RHA above 20%. Safiuddin et al. charge passed through the specimens in coulombs for
(2010) reported that excellent compressive strength was ach- different SCC mixes with and without rice husk ash are shown
ieved for the mix containing 15% RHA and Chik et al. (2011) in Fig. 4. From the results it was found that as the replacement
reported that at 28 d a mix containing 15% RHA showed the level of RHA increased, the charge passed decreased, except in
maximum compressive strength followed by mixtures con- case of 20RHA in which charge passed increased, but is still
taining 20 and 10% RHA. less than the CM (Fig. 4). The results can be compared to
In present investigation the improvement of compressive Kannan and Ganesan (2013) who reported that SCC blended
strength is mostly due to micro filling ability and pozzolanic with MK and RHA þ MK showed best results with very low
activity of RHA. Also the RHA is highly reactive; it reacts with chloride ion penetration. Therefore blended mixes have lower
calcium hydroxide (a byproduct of cement hydration) and ion penetration than unblended SCC. Zhang and Malhotra
produces additional C-S-H. The additional C-S-H reduces the (1996) reported that RHA concrete (10% replacement of
porosity of concrete by filling the capillary pores thus cement) had excellent resistance to chloride ion penetration
improving the microstructure of concrete in bulk paste matrix and the charge passed was below 1000 coulombs both at 28
and transition zone leading to increased compressive and 91 d. Ramasamy (2011) reported that most of the chloride
strength. ion permeability values fall in the range of very low (100e1000
A decrease in compressive strength was observed with coulombs) category. He also reported that as cement
20RHA. In this case, the amount of silica available in the hy- replacement by RHA increases, the charge passed decreases.
drated blended cement matrix was probably too high and the According to present investigation the permeability class
amount of the produced CeH was most likely insufficient to ranged from “moderate” for CM to “very low” for 15RHA. This
Fig. 2 e Compressive strength of SCC mixes at various ages. Fig. 3 e Split tensile strength of SCC mixes at various ages.
b i o s y s t e m s e n g i n e e r i n g 1 3 0 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 7 2 e8 0 77
SEM images of unblended SCC (100% OPC), 10% RHA, 15% RHA
and 20% RHA are shown in Fig. 6aed. These micrographs show
clear spread of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gel. Figure 6a
shows mix with 0% RHA replacement. It is observed that un-
blended concrete mix consist of irregular particles with micro
pores and cracking is also observed. This may be the main
reason for poor performance in relation to strength and
durability as compared to blended concrete. Figure 6b shows
mix with 10% RHA replacement. It is observed that micro
pores have decreased due to hydration progress. C-S-H gel is
Fig. 4 e Rapid chloride permeability test (RCPT) of SCC more widely spread in this case giving a uniform dense
mixes at 28 days of curing. structure than unblended concrete. This may be the reason for
slight increase in strength and durability properties as
compared to unblended concrete. Figure 6c shows mix with
is mainly due to the fact that incorporation of the RHA in 15% RHA replacement. It was observed that pore structure
concrete results in finer pore structure in the hydrated cement improved to a greater extent. No pores or cracking were
paste especially at the aggregate and paste interface. observed in this case. The C-S-H gel was fully spread over the
micrograph leading to highly uniform and dense structure.
3.5. Porosity The fibrous C-S-H formation acts as a thick impermeable
membrane for the ingress of chloride ions into concrete. This
Porosity is a significant factor as it directly affects the dura- would make the concrete more resistant to aggressive envi-
bility of the SCC. The results of porosity of SCC concrete mixes ronment as was observed from RCPT values. Figure 6d shows
are shown in Fig. 5. The results indicate that the porosity mix with 20% RHA replacement. It was observed that mix have
decreased with increases in curing time. The main reason started crumbling as the amount of RHA is increased. C-S-H
behind this is due to the additional or increased rate of hy- gel was not seen at all the places. Crumbling of mix may be the
dration and/or pozzolanic reactions. There is more formation reason for the reduced strength and degraded durability
of C-S-H gel as a product of pozzolanic reaction between cal- properties of this mix.
cium hydroxide and silica. This gel fills the voids and in-
creases the density of concrete. Lowest porosity is achieved by 3.7. X-ray diffraction (XRD)
mix 15RHA. 20RHA mix shows increase in porosity, but it is
still less than the CM. These results can be compared to those XRD analysis was conducted to analyse the components of
from Ramasamy (2011) who observed that the porosity value concrete mixes (Fig. 7a and b) and the material (Fig. 8aed)
decreases as the percentage of replacement increases. Rukzon used. The XRD pattern and analysis of the concrete mixes i.e.
and Chindaprasirt (2014) revealed that the porosities of SCC reference mix, and RHA mixes was carried out at age of 28 d.
decreased with increase in the curing time due to the addi- One of the major problems encountered in the qualitative and
tional hydration and/or pozzolanic reaction. quantitative analysis of cement is that there was strong
overlapping of major diffraction peaks of all the main phases
of cement components. XRD analysis of concrete samples
with or without RHA, showed peaks of quartz (Q), C-S-H, and
ettringite (E) phases.
XRD analysis also showed that the RHA was mainly in
amorphous silica form. Much less crystalline silica form was
observed in the form of cristobalite. From XRD analysis of OPC
it was observed that the main products were C3S (major
mineral component responsible for initial and final strength)
and C2S. In all the concrete mixes, C2S, C3S, and C4AF peaks
were not visible indicating that they may be totally consumed
or overlapping of the peaks of un-hydrated cement by that of
Si may have occurred as all analysed mixes were concrete
specimens with large number of aggregate particles contain-
ing quartz which resulted in intensive Si peaks. For the mix
15RHA the intensity of free silica decreased to 2000. There
Fig. 5 e Porosity of various SCC mixes at 7 days and 28 were more formation of C-S-H gel, this is the main reason for
days of curing. increase in strength as compared to other mixes.
78 b i o s y s t e m s e n g i n e e r i n g 1 3 0 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 7 2 e8 0
4. Conclusions
Fig. 8 e X-ray diffraction pattern of a) 0RHA (Control) mix, b) 10RHA, c) 15RHA, d) 20RHA.
to increased rate of hydration with time. The lowest Atan, M. N., & Awang, H. (2011). The compressive and
porosity was obtained by the mix containing 15% RHA. flexural strengths of self-compacting concrete using raw
7. XRD and SEM analyses revealed the increased formation of rice husk ash. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology,
6, 720e732.
a CSH gel for all mixes which helps explain the increased
Bartos, J. M. (2000). Measurement of key properties of fresh self-
compressive strength for 15% RHA concrete. Pores and compacting concrete. Paris: CEN/PNR Workshop.
cracking were at maximum for the control mix. The most Binici, H., Huseyin, T., & Mehmet, M. K. (2007). The effect of
dense structure was observed for 15% replacement with fineness on the properties of blended cements incorporating
RHA which resulted in the highest compressive strength ground granulated blast furnace slag and ground basaltic
for the mix. pumice. Construction and Building Materials, 21, 1121e1128.
Chik, F. A. W., Bakar, B. H. A., Johari, M. A. M., & Jaya, R. P. (2011).
Properties of concrete block containing rice husk ash.
International Journal of Research & Reviews in Applied Sciences, 8,
references 57e64.
Chindaprasirt, P., Kanchanda, P., Sathonsaowaphak, A., &
Cao, H. T. (2007). Sulfate resistance of blended cements
Agarwal, S. K., & Deepali, G. (2006). Utilization of industrial wastes containing fly ash and rice husk ash. Construction and Building
and unprocessed micro fillers for making cost effective Material, 21, 1356e1361.
mortars. Construction and Building Materials, 20, 999e1004. Detwiler, R. J. (1997). Microstructure of durable concrete. In
Ahmadi, M. A., Alidoust, O., Sadrinejad, I., & Nayeri, M. (2007). Proceedings of 6th international colloquium on concrete in developing
Development of mechanical properties of self compacting countries, Lahore Pakistan (pp. 459e468).
concrete contain rice husk ash. International Journal of Computer EFNARC. (2002). Specifications and guidelines for self-compacting
and Information Engineering, 1, 259e262. concrete (pp. 1e32). UK: EFNARC.
ASTM C 642. (2006). Specifications for standard test method for density, IS: 8112. (1989). Specification for 43 grade ordinary Portland cement.
absorption, and voids in hardened concrete. Annual book of ASTM Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi (India).
standards. IS: 383. (1970). Specification for coarse and fine aggregate from natural
ASTM C1202. (2010). Specifications for standard test method for sources for concrete. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
electrical indication of concrete's ability to resist chloride ion IS: 516. (1959). Specification for methods of test for strength of concrete.
penetration. Annual book of ASTM standards. Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi (India).
80 b i o s y s t e m s e n g i n e e r i n g 1 3 0 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 7 2 e8 0
IS: 5816. (1999). Specifications for methods of test for splitting tensile Muthadi, A., & Kothandaraman, S. (2013). Experimental
strength of concrete. Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi (India). investigations of performance characteristics of rice husk ash-
IS: 9103. (1999). Specification for concrete admixtures. Bureau of blended concrete. Journal of Material in Civil Engineering, 8,
Indian Standards, New Delhi. 1115e1118.
Juma, A., Sai, R., Prakash, D. V. A. K., Haider, S., & Rao, S. K. (2012). Okamura, H., & Ouchi, M. (2003). Self-compacting concrete.
An experimental study on synergic effect of sugar cane Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 1, 5e15.
bagasse ash with rice husk ash on self compaction concrete. Rahman, M. E., Muntohar, A. S., Pakrashi, V., Nagaratnam, B. H., &
International Journal of Science and Advanced Technology, 2, 75e80. Sujan, D. (2014). Self-compacting concrete from uncontrolled
Kannan, V., & Ganesan, K. (2013). Chloride and chemical burning of rice husk and blended fine aggregate. Materials and
resistance of self-compacting concrete containing rice husk Design, 55, 410e415.
ash and metakaolin. Construction and Building Materials, 51, Ramasamy, V. (2011). Compressive strength and durability
225e234. properties of rice husk ash concrete. KSCE Journal of Civil
Karim, M. R., Zain, M. F. M., Jamil, M., Lai, F. C., & Islam, M. N. Engineering, 16, 93e102.
(2012). Strength of mortar and concrete as influenced by rice Rukzon, S., & Chindaprasirt, P. (2014). Use of rice husk-bark ash in
husk ash: a review. World Applied Sciences Journal, 19, producing self-compacting concrete. Advances in Civil
1501e1513. Engineering, 2014. Article ID 429727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/
Khadiry, S. M., Nayak, G. P., Aziz, T., Saurav, S., & Pai, B. H. V. 2014/429727.
(2014). Evaluation of properties of self-compacting concrete Safiuddin, Md, West, J. S., & Soudki, K. A. (2010). Hardened
specimens having rice husk ash and shell lime powder as properties of self-consolidating high performance concrete
fillers. American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER), 3, 207e211. including rice husk ash. Cement and Concrete Composites, 32,
Khani, M. M., Ramezanianpour, A. A., & Ahmadibeni, G. (2009). 708e717.
The effect of rice husk ash on mechanical properties and Safiuddin, Md, West, J. S., & Soudki, K. A. (2012). Properties of
durability of sustainable concretes. International Journal of Civil freshly mixed self-consolidating concretes incorporating rice
Engineering, 7, 83e91. husk ash as a supplementary cementing material. Construction
Kibriya, T. (2006). Performance of blended cement in high strength self- and Building Materials, 30, 833e842.
compacting concrete. Structures congress: ASCE, 1e7. Sua-iam, G., & Makul, N. (2013). Utilization of limestone powder
Mahmud, H. B., Majuar, E., Zain, M. F. M., & Hamid, N. B. A. A. to improve the properties of self-compacting concrete
(2005). Strength, durability and shrinkage of high-strength rice incorporating high volumes of untreated rice husk ash as
husk ash concrete. ACI, 228, 189e212. fine aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, 38,
Memon, S. A., Shaikh, M. A., & Akbar, H. (2008). Production of low 455e464.
cost self-compacting concrete using rice husk ash. In Yamamichi, H., Qingge, F., Shoya, M., & Sugita, S. (2003). Some
Proceedings of 1st international conference on construction in properties of concrete with highly active rice-husk ash. ACI,
developing countries (ICCIDC-1), Pakistan (pp. 31e41). 212, 891e906.
Memon, S. A., Shaikh, M. A., & Akbar, H. (2010). Utilization of rice Zhang, M. H., & Malhotra, V. M. (1996). High-performance
husk ash as viscosity modifying agent in self-compacting concrete incorporating rice husk ash as a supplementary
concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 25, 1044e1048. cementing material. Materials Journal: ACI, 93, 629e636.