Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
APPLICATIONS DEVELOPMENT c1
J. P. LETKEMAN ENGINEERING OF CANADA, LTD.
CALGARY, ALTA.
APPLICATIONS DEVELOPMENT 8
R. L. RIDINGS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
MEMBERS AIME TULSA, OKLA.
. . -/ -......
- (;”ire-difference model to evaluate
ABSTRACT 1 ne desigfi “. -
coning behavior of gas or water in a singIe well
The numerical simulation o~ coning bebavior bas usually results in a model which uses radial
been one of tbe most difficult applications of coordinates. A two-dimensional single-well model
numerical analysis techniques. Coning simulations is illustrated in Fig. I. This type of model will
have generally exhibited severe saturation often produce finite-difference blocks with pore
instabilities in tbe vicinity o{ tbe well unless volumes less than 1 bbl near rhe wellbore while
time-step sizes were severely restricted. The producing large blocks with pore volumes greater
instabilities were a result of using nobilities based than 1 million bbl near the external radius. If one
on saturations existing at tbe beginning of the time chooses to use a reasonable time-step size of, say,
step. The time-step size limitation, usually tbe 1 ro 10 days, then normal well rates would result
order o~ a /ew minutes, resulted in an excessive in a flow of several hundred pore volumes per time
amount o{ computer time required to simulate step through the blocks near the wellbore. Therefore
coning behavior. the assumption that saturations remain constant,
This paper presents a numerical coning model for the purpose of coefficient evaluation, is not
that exhibits stable saturation and production valid.
behavior during cone formation and after break- Welge and Weberl presented a paper on water
through. Time-step sizes a factor of 100 to 1,000 coning which recognized the limitation of using
times as large as those previously possible may be explicir coefficients and applied an arbitrary
used in tbe simulation. To ensure stability, botb limitation on the maximum saturation change over a
production rates and nobilities are extrapolated time step. While this method is workable for a
implicitly to tbe new time level. The finite- dij{erence certain class of problems, it is not rigorous and is
equations used in tbe model are presented together not generally applicable. In 1968, Coats2 proposed
with the technique {or incorporating the updated a method to solve the gas percolation problem
nobilities and rates, Example calculations wbicb which is similar in that it also results from explicit
indicate tbe magnitude of the time-truncation errors nobilities. This proposal involved adjusting the
are included. Various factors which CZliect coning ~e]ative permeability to gas at the beginning of the
behavior are discussed. time step so that an individual biock wouid not be
over-depleted of gas during a time step. This
INTRODUCTION method is not conveniently extended to two
dimensions nor to coning problems where a block
The usual formulation of numerical simulation
is voided many times during a time step.
models for multiphase flow involves the evaluation
,,. . Blair and Weinaug3 explored the problems
of flow coerrlclefrt . ... beeinning
terms ..*. the “ of a time
re~oiting from explicitly determined coefficients
step and assumes that these terms do not change
and formulated a coning modei with irnpikit
over the time step. These assumptions are valid
nobilities and a solution technique urilizing
only if the values of pressure and saturation in the
Newtonian iteration. While this method is rigorous,
system do not change significantly over the time
achieving convergence on certain problems is
step.
difficult and, in many cases, time-step size is still
severely restricted.
Original manuscript received in Society of Petroleum Engineers
office Jan. 27, 1970. Revised manuscript received July 30, 1970. In addirion to the problems resulting from explicit
Paper (SpE 2812) was presented at Second Symposium on flow-equation coefficients in coning models, the
Numerical Simulation of Reservoir Performance, held in Dallas,
Tex., Feb. 5-6, 1970 @ Copyright 1970 American Institute of specification of rates requires attention to ensure
Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, Inc.
that the saturations remain stable in the vicinity of
lRefere”ce9 given at end of paper
the producing block. In reservoir modelling, it is
This paper will be printed in Tr.an.sacfions volume 249, which
-ill !-Over 1970. usual to specify, and hold constant over a rime
.-
. . ...... . . 0,.my,,
APPENDIX E RELATIVE PERMEABILITY AND
CAPILLARY PRESSURE DATA
CALCULATION DATA El
A
k. Pc
This appendix contains data used in the Sw kw Ow Ow
~
qprod = 1 B/D ( 120 B/D) = constani during expefkefit. * s~
Sg = i—S 02.
‘i r
***
step, rates of oil, gas and water based on conditions
at the beginning of the time step. This explicit
spec~fication of rates in a coning modeI is
unsatisfactory — particularly after breakthrough.
Coning mode is dispiay Fapiri p:es sure arrd
saturation changes in the vicinity of the wellbore—
particularly over the first few time steps after a
rate change. These models aiso are ~kta~teihd
by fiOw coeffieisn.= .- +; - ..c ~. .~W
.. . . V=y by a factor of
l@ from the wellbore to the outer radius. These 1
characteristics of coning models demand that
● P::;, - P:;l ‘~og (Di-Di+l) ‘qoi
special attention be given in the selection and
application of numerical solution techniques. [ I
so
THE
For simplicity
NUMERICAL
in development,
MODEL
be derived for a one-dimensional oil-water system. and the water equation may be written as:
Further, it will be assumed that the functions of
pressure (viscosity and formation volume factor) do
not vary significantly over the time step and can be
considered explicitly. This latter assumption is
reasonable since a change in formation volume
factor of 1 percent over a time step would be rare.
However, the saturation change, and the resulting
change in relative permeability, is significant and
will be assumed to be the controlling factor in the
changing mobility.
The difference equation for oil flow, with all
terms included, may be written as:
SW
=Vpi At
()~w
—.........(2)
I
J
1
PRODUCING -2
INTERvAL
{ -3
4
6
7
l] 1 I
8 OIL ZONE
9
13
! 1
7// //// A 77///l/////l//// /7,4’///////
14
/ ////x.L’’//zhM,///M/////J///////
15 / ////zK//// WATER
‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ZONE /
‘ ‘ “)+’’/’///./’’////’’/’/”
lb
17
18
19
20
J
~laoo’-+
rw r. FEETe re
factors
the relative
which are functions
in the changing
~pproximated
permeabilities,
of saturation,
nobilities,
at the new time level,
k,. and k,w,
are the controlling
they will be
n + 1. There are
[
p~i-1-p~i
-flog1[ 1 (Di-Di-]) S~+l-s~
i-‘/2
and . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .- (5)
[-L,2[’’’’1-P’:1
If rhe independent
the phase pressures
variables are selected
and saturation,
as one of
the followlng
+fw9(Di-Di-1)
1[ + kA
BWUWAX
[1
d kro n
)=kro (S~)+ ~ ‘+’ -s:)
(sO “(*~,/~li-, ‘p~i ‘~wg(Di-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .(4a)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4b)
for water.
An imporpant point ~Q remember is that mobility
terms should be evaluated at the upstream block.
Accordingly, the slopes of relative permeabili:ies
//(k+&)~~“ “ “ “(8a)
must be evaluated at that point as well as the
appropriate independent variable (either saturation
--- . . d
or capillary
variables
pressure).
indicated
For exampie, the Siop=
in Eqs. 5 and 6 at (i –’%) me
aJJ
“ w
a coning example of Blair and Weinaug.3 This 9 x 20 shows the movement of the 20-percent water
,, saturation contour with time, and Fig. 3 shows that
DJock mode! hid horizontal permeability of I to 5
darcies and vertical permeability of 100 md. Tiie of the 50-percent contour- The Calculated ‘ariat{on
bottom-water drive system produced 6,OOO bbl of in water saturation at the bottom of the p~edl~clng
reservoir fluid per day. The original oil in place interval using time steps up to 100 days is shown
was about 34 million bbl. A description of the as Fig. 4. Fig. 5 shows the calculated variation in
model is given in Fig. 1 and Table 1. water-oil ratio with the different time-step sizes.
Calculations were made for the example case Estimates of the time truncation errors obtained
which predicted model performance for 2,000 days from Figs. 4 and 5 indicate that the errors introduced
using time steps of 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 days. All by the larger time steps have the effect of a time
calculations were performed on the CDC 6600 delay on calculated performance. The precision
computer and solution times varied from 1 to 10 required from the model will depend on the individual
minutes. The solution times varied, based on the application and the relative accuracy of data
time steps used and the number of iterations estimates. Usually, a Uial-and-error approach must
required to converge for each time step. A variant be used to select the optimum time-step for a
particular coning application. Although the larger
time-steps cause a relatively larger error in the
TABLE 1 — PROPERTIES OF CONING MODEL the results are usually
calculated performance,
Oil density 0.826 gmlcc
adequate for engineering purposes. In this case,
Water density 1,0 gmlcc
Oii compressibility 1. x 10-5 vOl\vOl/psi
Water compressibility 3. x 10-6 vOifvOi~psi
Oil viscosity 0.31 Cp
Water viscosity 0.34 Cp
Production rate 6,000 RB/D
Sw K K ro Pc
~
G 0.0000 0.95 1.23
0.2 0.004 0.75 0.66
0.25 0.0102 0.5876 0.54
0.3 0.0166 0.4462 0.48
0.35 0.0232 0.3325 0.42 620
100 OATS
0.4 0.0305 0.2450 0.38
0.45 0.0392 0.1770 0.34
I
0.5 0.0497 0.1200 0,30
0,27 lW
0.55 0.0630 0.0724
0.6 0.0798 0.0374 0.24
180
0.65 0.1000 0.0163 0.21
0.7 0.1244 0.0020 0.17
0.12
200 .,&, .&. &’ 400 500 Soo 700 we ●OO 1000 1100 ‘
0.75 0.1525 0.0001
RADIUS
- FT.
0.8 0.1870 0.0000 -0.22
55 5 DAY STEP
10 DAY STEP
so
\\
4 5
50 DAY STEP >
~.\
\ 50 MY STEP
40 100 D~~S7ZF\ 100OATSTEP
\\
\
35
30.
.?5
I000 140 Iwo 1s00 2300
TIME - DAYS
.. . . . .. . .