Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Administration (RSA)
Split-Site PhD:
Individual applicants of very high
quality (Model C)
JYF/KS/AH/SEH
June 2012
3. All applicants are required to submit a clearly planned research project at the
application stage. Schools will be expected to address any relevant ethics issues and to
undertake risk assessments where relevant.
4. Method of study: Candidates accepted under these arrangements are normally expected to
study on a part-time basis with some periods of full-time study in Leeds.
5. Duration of programme: 5 year standard period of study with a maximum time limit for
submission of the PhD thesis of 7 years.
6. Requirements for supervision: Supervisors are appointed at the University of Leeds and a
"local" advisor must also be appointed. The "local" advisor should normally be employed in a
HEI, Research Institute or Commercial or Industrial Organisation with a significant research
component or reputation and should be readily available for consultation. Other individuals
may be appropriate for appointment as “local advisor” and schools should put forward
information to support these cases. The “local advisor” should be familiar with the UK
system for the award of research degrees.
The local advisor is NOT required to meet the University criteria as a supervisor and as such
is not responsible for providing the same level of advice and guidance as the appointed
Leeds supervisor(s). The appointed Leeds supervisor(s) is expected to provide supervisory
support in accordance with usual practice. i.e. conduct at least 5 formal supervisory meetings
a year, although these do not need to be face-to-face. However, whatever medium of
communication is used detailed minutes should be kept.
8. Visit by Supervisor(s): The Leeds supervisor(s) are normally expected to visit the
student at their place of part-time study at least once during the course of the
candidature and the costs of this visit should be included within the fee charged.
10. Academic fees: The rates charged by the University are Year 1, 75% of the standard
University full-time fee, Years 2-5, 50% of the standard University full-time fee. Fees are
chargeable at either the UK/EU rate or the international rate, as appropriate to the relevant
fee status of the candidate.
Please note that Faculties/Schools may reduce the level of fees directly chargeable to
individual students, provided that the Faculty/School meets the residual University fees by
completing a Form 21 and returning it to the Accounts Receivable Office. If Faculties/Schools
require an additional bench fee to cover specific research expenses this should be clearly
indicated on the Recommendation Form (Annex A).
11. Resources: The applicant must have a statement of support from their employer (if in
employment) which provides evidence that relevant resources and facilities are in place for
the research. This information must be provided on the Form for Employers (Annex B). The
Steering Committee must be satisfied that the applicant has access to appropriate facilities
for the conduct of the research.
Once all the required information (set out above) is provided the application will be
considered by the University Steering Committee for Split-site PhD programmes. Please
ensure that the attached forms are fully completed and returned to Research Student
Administration together with the application form and other documents relating to the
applicant.
12. Progress monitoring during the candidature: The candidate is required to complete a
Progress Report at six month intervals during the standard period of study (i.e. at 6, 12, 18,
24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and 54 months). It is the normal expectation that the Transfer Assessment
will be completed by the end of Year 2.
Two types of progress reports are required (the expectation is that these will be uploaded
into the PDR system – instructions for administrators on how to set up split-site progress
reports in the PDR system are available from RSA):
i. 6 monthly progress reports from the candidate (i.e. at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 &
54 months).
These reports must be approved and signed off by the Supervisor. The reports must
be reviewed by the Postgraduate Research Tutor and then (if no particular issues
require investigation) be retained in the PDR system.
The Transfer Assessment should be completed by the end of Year 2 (24 months) and
the student’s transfer submission may be substituted instead of the 24 month
progress report.
A Progress Report is not usually required at the end of Year 5 (i.e. at 60 months), as
the normal expectation is that candidates will submit their theses by the end of Year
5. In the event that the candidate does not submit within 3.5 years, progress reports
will continue to be required at 6 monthly intervals until completion.
ii. 6 monthly progress reports from the supervisor (in the case of two or more
supervisors this report must come from all supervisors and be signed by all or
uploaded into the PDR system by one of the supervisors on behalf of all). The Six
Following completion and uploading into the PDR system this report will be
downloaded by RSA for consideration by the University Steering Committee for Split–
Site PhD Programmes.
13. Where a number of students are accepted under Split Site Model C from an academic
institution, the partners will be academic institutions which engage in research activity (see
Ordinance XIX article 9).
NB: Fees are chargeable at either the UK/EU rate or the international rate, as appropriate to the
relevant fee status of the candidate. Please bear in mind that the standard levels of academic fees
for UK/EU students normally increase each year to take account of inflation. However, the standard
fee levels for international students will remain the same throughout the candidature.
This form must be completed by the Director of Faculty Graduate School for applicants
recommended for a Provisional PhD candidature under the Model C Split-site candidature.
Section 3. Details of the arrangements for part-time study carried out at a venue other than Leeds
3.1 Details of the Applicant's Employer and the post held by the applicant (if in employment):
3.3 Proposed "Local Advisor". Please provide details and post held below, together with evidence of the
Advisor's familiarity with the UK system for the award of research degrees. (For example, evidence
could include examination experience of UK PhD or the proposed Advisor holding a UK PhD) The
Advisor should normally be employed in an HEI, Research or Commercial or Industrial organisation
with a significant research component or reputation. Other individuals may also be appropriate for
appointment as a “local advisor” and Schools are asked to provide information below to support the
case for appointment. Is the proposed “Advisor” willing, in principle, to act in this capacity?
3.4 Statement of Support from Applicant's Employer, if in employment (please arrange for completion
of the appropriate form).
A statement of support from the Applicant's Employer (where relevant) must be attached
indicating the resources and facilities that will be made available for the conduct of the
research.
4.1 Documents which must also be sent to Research Student Administration, alongside the relevant
sections of this document, University application form and other relevant submitted documents:
(b) a statement of support from the Applicant's Employer (where relevant) indicating the resources and
facilities that will be made available for the conduct of the research
Section 5. Signatures
1. Applicant’s name:
3. Subject of study:
4. Provide details of any time allocation that will be given to the candidate so that they can
undertake part-time research degree study:
5. What provision has been made for the applicant to be given leave of absence for their period of
full-time study at the University of Leeds:
6. What facilities/resources will be made available at the applicant’s place of work to enable them
to undertake research degree study:
7. Are facilities/resources available at any other venues? If so, please provide full details:
9. Name:
10. Position:
11. Signed:
Once completed, the School should return the form by post, email or fax to:
Research Student Administration, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
rp_applications@leeds.ac.uk
Tel: 0113 343 4006
Fax: 0113 343 3941
Introduction
This Student’s Progress Report is intended to help students reflect critically on progress that has
been made, to identify and to keep training needs under review, to detect and resolve any incipient
problems and to ensure the timely submission of the PhD thesis within the standard period of study.
The student is required to complete a Progress Report at six month intervals during the standard
period of study (i.e. at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and 54 months in the candidature).
It is the normal expectation that the Transfer Assessment will be completed by the end of Year 2.
Therefore, the end of year progress report for Year 2 should normally be the student’s Transfer
Report.
A Progress Report is not usually required at the end of Year 5 (i.e. at 60 months), as the normal
expectation is that candidates will submit their theses by the end of Year 5. In the event that the
candidate does not submit within 5 years, progress reports will continue to be required at 6 monthly
intervals until completion.
The supervisor(s) is also expected to complete a report on the student’s progress at six month
intervals during the standard period of study. On completion of the relevant University report form
(available from the above web page), the form should be uploaded into the PDR. The form will then
be considered by the University Steering Committee on Split-Site PhD Programmes.
* It is the normal expectation that the Transfer Assessment will be completed by the end of
Year 2. Therefore, the 24 month report should normally be the Transfer Report.
** The normal expectation is that students will submit their theses within 5 years (i.e. the
standard period of study).
Please list any conference presentations/published works in the last six months
2.3 Placements/visits
Provide details of any placements/visits associated with your research that you have
undertaken in the last six months
3.1 Supervision
Detail the regularity and frequency of supervision meetings
Describe the usual form of meetings (e.g. conference phone call, webcam, email etc.)
You may wish to use the space below to comment on the supervision you have received.
“Local advisor”: You may wish to use the space below to comment on the “local” advice
and guidance you have received
3.3 Facilities/resources
Have you encountered any problems with the facilities needed to undertake your research?
Have these been resolved?
4.2 Priorities for generic and subject/professional skills training and development
Split-Site PhD Model C - June 2012 (updated Sept 13) 11
I have read and commented on the above report and confirm that (please complete as
appropriate):
The student’s progress is satisfactory
Section 6: Approval of the student’s progress report*
To be signed by the student and supervisor(s)
* Once the supervisor(s) has commented on the draft report, both the student and supervisor(s)
should sign the report which should then be uploaded into the PDR system. The student’s progress
report will be reviewed by the Postgraduate Research Tutor and will be retained in the PDR system.
This section asks for a brief report on progress made during the current reporting period. As a guide
you should use around 800 words as a maximum limit.
The following are suggestions of the type of information you might include:
Describe your success (or otherwise) in achieving the objectives specified in your previous
Progress Report including reference to progress made against the agreed training plan
Provide a summary of the progress made in collecting and/or analysing data
Comment on what you have accomplished in your generic and subject/professional skills
development
Describe any associated work benefits as a result of the progress you have made
Give details of any difficulties you have encountered - for example any problems associated
with fieldwork (e.g. access to the field) or other research (e.g. library or laboratory-based or
practice-led work). Have these been overcome? Are there any outstanding issues? How do
you propose to resolve them?
Describe any difficulties you may have experienced in obtaining access (e.g. to the field,
data, facilities or other resources)
Explain how any ethical issues have been addressed (please refer to the research ethics
policy, review and advice http://www.sddu.leeds.ac.uk/sddu-research-ethics-resources.html )
Give details of any problems arising as a result of the chosen methodology/ies or any
problems arising as a result of modifications
Provide details of any changes in the direction of the research
Describe progress of the thesis
If this is your first Progress Report (i.e. mid-year report, Year 1), please provide details of your
progress and achievements since you started. The following are suggestions of the type of
information you might include:
Introduction
The supervisor(s) should complete a report on the candidate’s progress at six month intervals during
the period of study, irrespective of periods of suspension.
On completion, the supervisor report should be uploaded in the PDR system using the naming
convention “split-site X month supervisor report”. Please note that reports will be visible to students
and copies are sometimes requested from RSA by sponsors/employers.
Supervisor Progress Reports are considered by the University Steering Committee for Split Site
Programmes. Any concerns arising will be raised with the relevant PGR tutor. Students complete a
separate progress report which they should upload in the PDR, however this is only reviewed at
School/Faculty level.
2. Research activities
Split-Site PhD Model C - June 2012 (updated Sept 13) 14
Please comment briefly on the candidate’s research activities:
4. Ethical Issues
Please comment briefly on whether any ethical implications have been identified as part of the
student’s research project. Please make reference to the progress of any ethical review form
submitted for consideration:
5. Academic progress
Please comment briefly on the candidate’s academic progress. Please make reference to the quality
and quantity of work completed and the progress that has been made towards objectives:
6. Modifications
Please comment on whether any changes to the candidature are required (e.g. changes to the
arrangements for supervision, changes to the student’s registration or research topic).
7. Action needed
Any agreed action that needs to be taken:
8. Approval
Signature*: ……………………………………………………… Date……………………….
(supervisor)
Signature*: ……………………………………………………… Date……………………….
(supervisor)
* If this form is being uploaded by one of the supervisors via the PDR system, no signatures are required,
however please include names of all supervisors who have contributed to/approved the report.