As in it happens in many cases the hardest part of an written assignment is (besides
gathering information) the beginning. In my opinion, the introduction should provide the abstract definition for the subject in metter and the main futures and the key ideas regarding the essay. My beliefs are that every student who follows the courses of the English program at UDC asked himself during the last couple of weeks this question: “What is Public International Law?”. The definition which is usually to be found into the doctrine or in the specialty literature points out that the Public Internatonal Law is constituted by the body of rules, norms, and standards that apply between sovereign states and other entities that are legally recognized as international actors. Moving further with my investigation, I could not omit to say a few words about the international subjects who are governed by the International body law. Earlier states were the only subjects of international law but now the position has changed gradually and now individuals, international organizations and non-state entities are also treated as subjects, which were earlier treated as objects of international law. From a historical perspective, I would like to introduce a few ideas regarding the development of the International Law during the early history of the Roman Empire period (since the subject fascinated me troughout the first year of my studies). The Romans did not developed an international law, as it acted without regard to any external rules in its dealings with those territories that were not already part of the empire. The Romans did, however, form municipal laws regulating the interactions between private Roman citizens and foreigners. These laws, called the jus gentium (as opposed to the jus civile governing interactions between citizens) codified some ideas of basic fairness, and attributed some rules to an objective, independent "natural law." These jus gentium ideas of fairness and natural law have survived and are reflected in modern international law. Nevertheless, the historical evolution has always taken historians by surprise and therefore, after the fall of the Roman Empire and the collapse of the Holy Roman Empire into autonomous cities, principalities, kingdoms, states and nations, and for the first time there was a real need for rules of conduct between a large international community without an empire or a dominant religious leadership to moderate and direct international dealings. Moving further into the modern times, I feel compelled to remark one of the most significant piece of the International Public Law architecture which is (due to my considerations) the fact that if treaties (the agreements or contract among states under which the parties intend to be bound) are broken, their effectivenesssis weakend because there is no assurance that future promises will be kept and, therefore, no form of punishment will be available in the sense of the civil law kind of remedies. There is another key element which differentiates Public Int. Law from the other law branches and that is due to the fact that The ICJ (the principal judicial organ of the United Nationas consisting of 15 judges, each from different states) has jurisdiction only over states that have consented to it. It follows that the court cannot hear a dispute between two or more state parties when one of the parties has not accepted its jurisdiction. This can happen even where the non-consenting party adheres to the court's statute, for mere adherence to the statute does not imply consent to its tribunals. In other words, just as men could not live together in a society without laws and customs to regulate their actions, so States could not have mutual intercourse without usages and conventions to regulate their conduct. International Law impinges on state sovereignty by creating new structures for regulating relations across international boundaries.The harmony in political ideas, art and literature, scientific discovery, the exchange of embassy for the purpose of carrying on International intercourse and commerce all tends to bring States together in a social bond. This being said there is a large agreement regarding the fact that without International laws and customs, it is impossible for states to maintain relations on the basis of peace, harmony and mutual co-operation. Rather, then the rule 'might is right' will prevail that would be destructive for the global peace and humanity. To summarize in a short sentence the basis of the main ideas and arguments presented previously I would define the mission of the body of rules regulating the International law which governs relations between states as the leading source which provides the basis for peace and stability and aims to protect and ensure the wellbeing of humankind. There is a vast range of opinions and classification as regarding the fundamental principles of Public International Law but, in my opinion, the cornerstone concept of the PIL stands in the rule of law. The rule of law implies that rights must be protected by law, independently of the will of the ruler. Individual rights and freedoms are to be protected against any manifestation of arbitrary power by public authorities. The principle of the ‘rule of law’ is contained in the Preamble to the Charter of the United Nations. The evolution from the concept promoted during the XI century leading to the idea that the the King was subject to the law (and also the source of all legislation, while the administration of justice and the jurisdiction were his privileges), because it was the law that had first made him King (quia lex facit regem). This is what was originally meant by the rule of law has gone thorugh a process of changes (paralel to evolving views on the role, functioning and organsation of a national Government) the e rule of law should thus be seen as a whole set of legal standards by which governments and subjects are bound. The exact content of these standards is determined by several factors, including public opinion, political consciousness and the prevailing sense of justice. Nowadays , the rule of law aims to maintain a delicate balance between the opposite notions of individual liberty and public order. After this brief presentation I would like to mention some of qualities which I’m convinced that will bring a plus into the PIL classes. This being laid out, there is an unwritten agreement between law students as regarding the difficulty and demands of learning case briefs, hundreds of pages of doctrine or the necessity to always be connected to the political, legislative or economical changes in a certain area of the globe/region. Therefore, law school is meant to be challenging, it’s meant to push you out of your comfort zone and think about issues in a new way, but I’d like to see myself as an ambitious person and a dedicated student who rather than getting discouraged or frustrated will embrace into the law school atmosphere and even enjoy the challenge of learning the law and mastering new skills. Nevertheless, we shall not forget that an international lawyer has to adapt to the changes of the International law regulations since the characteristic of the International law is the flexibility of it’s provisions. There are some things that I would like to emphasize in relations with the aspects that characterize me which are the dedication, passion, sacrifice and oblation but most importantly, the fact that I’m always fully committed and willing to do everthings that needs to be done in a proper and qualitative form/manner. There could be more to be said, but I’m afraid that by making a exhaustive/complete presentation of myself, all the charm of the relation between a student and his/her professor would disappear since the social communication is more important than trying to make an impression throughout an reflection paper.