2016

BBUS601: Current
themes in business

CONSUMERS’ ATTITUDE TOWARDS CORPORATE SOCIAL

RESPONSIBILITY WITHIN THE UNITED KINGDOM RETAIL
CLOTHING INDUSTRY
DELCIO FALO – W1568784 Module Leader:
Dr Vincent Rich
UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER | Westminster Business school
Consumers’ attitude towards Corporate Social Responsibility
within the United Kingdom retail clothing industry.

Abstract
Todays' consumerism society has constrained organizations to work towards the social
benefit rather than simply maximising its financial interest. Shoppers consider an
organization's work with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as essential and anticipate that
organization would work morally. Be that as it may, faster design shoppers' request a low cost
and fast changes in patterns. Accordingly, the reason for this theory is to see immediate
mould customers' demeanor towards organizations working in an ethical manner. By leading
a survey of clients in the UK, data has been gathered to examine this trend. The outcomes
demonstrate that most of the respondents have an uplifting state of mind towards CSR, yet
were not a central element when looking for attire. From this review, we can reach the
determinations that despite the fact that most of the respondents had an inspirational
disposition towards CSR, different components were of more noteworthy significance. This
approves the phenomenon about costumers requiring affordable clothing prices and faster-
evolving patterns.

2
Table of Contents
Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 2
1. Introduction.............................................................................................................. 4
1.1 Problem Dialog ............................................................................................................ 5
1.2 Research Aims and Objectives ...................................................................................... 5
2 Literature Review...................................................................................................... 6
2.1 The concept of CSR ............................................................................................................. 6
2.2 Mentalities and the Tricomponent State of mind Model ...................................................... 7
2.3 Buyer State of mind to Moral Purchasing ............................................................................ 8
3 Research Methodology ............................................................................................. 9
3.1 Data Gathering ................................................................................................................. 10
3.4 Reliability and Validity of Research ................................................................................... 10
4 Findings and Evaluation .......................................................................................... 11
4.1 Consumer Understandings of CSR in the UK Clothing Industry ........................................... 11
4.2 Consumer interest in Corporate Social Responsibility within the UK retail Clothing Industry
.............................................................................................................................................. 12
4.3. Consumer mentality and CSR/ The respondent’s’ state of mind ........................................ 15
4.4. The respondents' mindfulness and state of mind.............................................................. 15
4.4.2 CSR issues in the UK fashion industry ............................................................................. 16
5 Limitations of the study and Recommendations for further studies ......................... 17
5.1 Limitations ....................................................................................................................... 17
5.2 Suggestions ...................................................................................................................... 17
6 Conclusions ............................................................................................................. 18
7 Appendices ............................................................................................................. 19
8 Bibliography ........................................................................................................... 22

3
 1. Introduction
Shoppers are becoming conscious of the substantial content of the clothing they are
buying, in such ways that some of them are even inspecting the material used by suppliers
demanding that all the process evolved in the production and supply chain should be ethical
and transparent (Bin, et al., 2012). Businesses need to acknowledge the consequences of their
practices to the surrounding environment (Cornelissen, 2011). Admitting and answering to
costumers and non-governmental organization requirements are helping many businesses to
become successful. Furthermore, a large number of retail clothing businesses are looking at
the environmental and social effects of their practices by involving in nature and wildlife
protection, or by supporting and giving donations to a social cause, and those actions are
described as CSR (Cornelissen, 2011).

Analysing the function of CSR in the fashion industry is very important since matters
related to CSR have been present in the Worldwide fashion market for many years now.
Moreover, as many businesses opt to operate in countries where the cost of production are
low, many issues arise from that such as employees claiming that wages are too low, use of
child labour and poor working conditions (Dickson & Eckman , 2006). From the business
perception, customers play an important role in CRS due to their influence in rewarding or
penalising companies practices (Pomering & Dolnicar, 2009). According to Bhattacharya et all
(2010), costumers support for Corporate Social Responsibility can be presented for example
as brand reliability, encouraging word of mouth and willingness to pay higher.

In order to gain optimistic answers to Corporate Social Responsibility, businesses

should pay attention to customer’s understandings of CSR as well as CSR communication.
According to Dawkins (2004), studies have shown that the majority of customers agrees that
businesses must address moral aspects of their business practices and demand more CSR
communication than what is provided. In any case, there have been recognized sure
difficulties which may influence client's reaction to CSR Correspondence. Primarily, customers
will not be able to get involved with CSR in any way if they are uninformed of businesses’
responsibility efforts. However, customers still show a lack of knowledge as regards to CSR
and the majority chooses to ignore the efforts of businesses’ involvement in CSR
(Bhattacharya, et al., 2010). Secondly, a lack of trust in CSR communications is a challenge for
companies (Bhattacharya, et al., 2010) .

The fashion retail industry is, for the most part, fitting for the field of Global Business
Correspondence study because of its significantly globalized nature. Chief apparel brands are
situated in numerous nations around the world, elevating comparative design patterns to the
buyer in the greater part of their areas. Many businesses have relocated their manufacturing
process to countries where costs of production are meant to be lower (Emmelhainz & Adams,
1999) subsequently, they have also been accused of breaching Employees rights by paying
lower wages, ignoring safety and health concerns, as well as child labour abuse (Dickson &
Eckman , 2006). Ecological concerns such as using harmful substances have also been
addressed (Hustvedt & Bernard, 2010).

4
 Fashion businesses have responded to the criticism at manufacturing and brand levels
(Jegethesan & Soutar, 2012). Joergens (2006) guaranteed that Top overall brands have newly
made plans to enhance responsible garments fabricating and new marks situated on moral
characteristics have encountered critical business development.
1.1 Problem Dialog

Fast apparel buyers' interest for quick modest and in vogue garments while keeping up their
desires of organizations working morally has thusly created a contact in the business.
Notwithstanding the few constructive outcomes for organizations working with CSR, this can
likewise have a negative impact. Bhattacharya and Sen (2004) contend that clients are more
delicate towards CSR data that is negative. As indicated by Grankvist (2012), the sole
motivation behind a few organizations working with CSR is to build their benefit. In such
circumstances, the go for the organization is not to add to society or to live up to their client's
desires yet to utilize it as an advancement procedure (McWilliams, Siegel and Wright, 2006).
Subsequently, this can negatively affect clients' state of mind towards an organization. In
specific situations, clients' likeliness to buy an item from an organization can diminish
(Grankvist, 2012). It is subsequently basic that organizations increment the comprehension
of their work keeping in mind the end goal to diminishing this potential distrust among their
clients. Organizations can in this manner exhibit their CSR reports and subsequently make
straightforwardness by the way they work (Mckwilliams, et al., 2006).

As already specified an apparel organization's work with CSR can prompt to the clients having
a positive as well as a negative perspective of the organization. To the extent we know, this
issue has not yet been generally talked about inside the United Kingdom. To build the
comprehension of shoppers' state of mind identified with CSR I have chosen to research this
subject further. It would likewise hold importance with examining how imperative CSR is for
the fast fashion clients and on the chance that they are probably going to re-assess their state
of mind. In light of this, our main exploration question is:

What is consumers’ attitude on Corporate Social Responsibility in the United Kingdom fashion
industry?

1.2 Research Aims and Objectives

The goal of this study is to increase the awareness on customer's behaviours towards
CSR, understanding ethical consumption decisions, Evaluating the impact of ethical fashion
on consumers’ buying decisions, Evaluating Consumers interest in CSR, Evaluating Consumer
awareness of CSR efforts by clothing businesses and CSR in the United Kingdom Retail
Clothing Industry, the significance of CSR in connection to different variables and if the clients
are probably going to re-assess their disposition towards an organization that works with CSR.
This will be finished by directing a clear review and playing out a survey on customers.

 Are consumers really conscious of CSR in the Clothing Industry?

 Do consumers really show interest in CSR practices in the Clothing Industry?
 Does Corporate Social Responsibility affect consumers’ buying decisions?
 Is this investigation of extreme importance? could it help raise awareness of
businesses?

5
2 Literature Review
The major theories contained in the Review are explanations of CSR, How CSR is
merged into business practices. In this part, the segments of Corporate Social Responsibility
will be disclosed keeping in mind the end goal to give the reader a comprehension of the idea.
Additionally, a clarification of how buyers' states of mind are shaped, and their disposition
about moral purchasing, will be made.

2.1 The concept of CSR

The concept of CSR has become very recognised in International business, CSR can be
described as the business sense of responsibility regarding the Society and the environment
in which it operates (Carroll & Shabana, 2010). The idea of organizations going past its lawful
commitments to safeguard the earth. In any case, the individuals who do not rehearse CSR
tend to be the firms working under Friedman's shareholder model which consider that
company's administration are exclusively capable to their shareholders and to amplify
benefits on their interest in the firm (Friedman, 1976).

One approach to clarifying the segments of CSR is concluded via Carroll (Carroll, 1991).
He has partitioned CSR into a pyramid that comprises of four unique regions of obligation:
monetary, legitimate, moral and generous. The monetary obligation implicates that it is in
each organization's enthusiasm to make a benefit and to have it as an intention. The
legitimate obligation implies that organizations must take to existing laws and controls in their
day to day work. The moral duty alludes to the performed activities not controlled by law but
rather ought to be in an organization's enthusiasm to perform. It is regularly measures or
standards that shoppers consider as just or reasonable. The charitable obligation alludes to
an organization's activities performed with a specific end goal to experience society's e
desires. Carroll expresses that the moral and humanitarian duty is comparable. Despite the
fact that the pyramid is isolated into various territories of duties, Carroll underscores the
significance of utilizing every one of the ranges together keeping in mind the end goal to have
the capacity to utilize CSR to its completely degree (Carroll, 1991).

Figure 1 Carroll's Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility. from research-methodology.com

6
 Another noticeable specialist inside CSR is Grankvist whose understanding of the
segments made him partition it into three zones of obligation; monetary, ecological and social
duty (Grankvist, 2012, pp. 9-19). His understanding of the monetary segment is like Carroll's
definition. The natural obligation obliges organizations to settle on decisions that don't
influence the earth's assets adversely over the long haul. The social obligation implies that an
organization ought to maintain their business in a way so they are considered being a decent
individual from the general public. They ought to likewise take their representatives'
wellbeing and prosperity into thought. This incorporates representatives of the organization,
subcontractors, business accomplices and shoppers (Grankvist, 2012).

2.2 Mentalities and the Tricomponent State of mind Model

The idea of CSR is seen upon contrastingly and buyers have distinctive states of mind
towards the idea. As per Hansen, Kanuk, and Schiffmann (2010, p. 254), "a state of mind is a
scholarly inclination to act in a reliable positive or unfavourable path as for a given question."
(Hansen et al. 8 p. 4). A state of mind is evaluated by specialists by asking the shoppers
questions or by making conclusions in regards to buyers' conduct (Hansen et al., 2008, p. 256).
There are a few speculations with respect to mentality development and state of mind
change. One driving hypothesis with respect to customer disposition is known as the
Tricomponent State of mind Model (Hansen et al., 2008, p. 256). This model comprises of
three parts utilized when a demeanour is shaped: the affective, subjective and conative
segment. These segments are entwined and on the off chance that one changes, alternate
parts may change or be influenced too (Triandis, 1971, referred to in Bricklayer, 2005, pp. 34-
35; Hansen et al., 2008 p. 256).

Figure 2 Representation of the Tricomponent Attitude Model. From Slideshare.net

The main part is cognitive. That is the point at which a man's underlying musings and
convictions decide the state of mind towards a specific subject or question. These
contemplations and convictions can be the aftereffect of generalizations or general feelings.
For instance, when a man hears "tyke work" the individual may naturally relate the word with
terrible working conditions and low pay. In the event that one has never heard the word or
does not know the importance of it the individual's state of mind is neither positive nor
negative (Triandis, 1971, referred to in Mason, 2005, pp. 34-35; Hansen et al., 2008, p. 257).

7
 The second segment is full of feeling. This part is the point at which the individual has
emotions towards a particular theme or protest (Triandis, 1971, referred to in Mason, 2005,
pp. 34-35). A man can feel loathe towards an organization that utilizations youngster work
since they feel that kid work is awful. Accordingly, when the individual hears the word tyke
work, he/she feels outraged or despise.

The third and last part of the Tricomponent Attitude Model is conative. This is the
progression where the individual makes a behavioural activity (Triandis, 1971, referred to in
Mason, 2005, pp. 34-35; Hansen et al., 2008 p. 256). This activity could, for instance, be "I will
blacklist organizations that utilize children work". This implies the individual is acting or
standing firm from the state of mind they have towards a point.

2.3 Buyer State of mind to Moral Purchasing

The scientists Carrigan and Attalla (2001) have built up a hypothesis in regards to
buyers' mentality when they are purchasing moral items or administrations. To make an
uplifting state of mind towards moral buys, it is vital to make consciousness of the moral item,
and that the customer has a moral buying goal. Carrigan and Attalla (2001) composed an
exploration paper where they made a mentality demonstrate. The model clarifies the
purchaser' state of mind towards moral mindfulness, moral buys, and the buy goals. The
model comprises of four sorts of purchasers' state of mind classifications: the neglectful, the
befuddled and unverifiable, the critical and unbiased and the caring and moral.

Figure 3 Buyer State of mind to Moral Purchasing (Carrigan and Attalla, 2001). from Slideshare.net

In the primary classification, the careless, customers are acquiring either morally or
not. They don't know about their activities since they are inadequate with regards to
information about moral buying and about the organization's view on moral issues.
Consequently, this gathering of buyers has low moral buying goals (Carrigan and Attalla,
2001).

8
 The second classification incorporates the buyers that are befuddled and dubious.
These shoppers are the ones that need to buy morally, however, get confounded about the
data they are getting from the organization. They now and then see that the organization is
not reliable with their moral conduct, bringing about weariness and perplexity. As per
Carrigan and Attalla (2001), organizations would pick up a great deal by giving more data to
these sorts of customers keeping in mind the end goal to bring issues to light in regards to the
organization's moral conduct. These buyers are effortlessly induced and thusly, clearer
correspondence in regards to the organization's moral conduct would be extremely
advantageous. This gathering of shoppers has a low moral mindfulness yet high moral
acquiring goals (Carrigan and Attalla, 2001).

The third classification is the pessimistic and unbiased shoppers. These buyers are not
influenced by the data with respect to the organization's moral conduct. They are not
persuaded if the organization is honest to goodness or not. These shoppers would just buy
moral items in the event that it would not influence their decision of item and brand. That is
the reason it is vital for the organizations to make simple and down to earth approaches to
buy moral items. One case is that the organization plainly can state what moves they are
making towards moral conduct. They can, for instance, concentrate on particular advertising
strategies that stress their moral and CSR work with a specific end goal to separate themselves
from others. In the event that they actualize these thoughts, they can pull in the negative
purchaser. This gathering of buyers has a high moral mindfulness, however, a low moral
buying goal (Carrigan and Attalla, 2001).

The last class is the one with the caring and moral buyers that eagerly separate untrustworthy
items. This implies they decided to not buy an item that is dishonest or an item from an
unscrupulous organization. Notwithstanding, take note of that these purchasers are
particular in their decisions. The imperative component for organizations is to underline and
concentrate on their most vital question and convey the message to the buyer genuine. It is
additionally imperative that the customer has an indistinguishable view on moral purchasing
from the organization. This gathering of shoppers has a high moral mindfulness and high
moral buy aims (Carrigan and Attalla, 2001).

3 Research Methodology
In this part, the research strategy will be displayed, trailed by the choice of
organization and respondents. Likewise, a clarification of how the investigation was led. As
per Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2012, pp.158-164), a subjective, quantitative or different
research techniques plans can be utilized when directing a review. A quantitative research
strategy has for the most part been utilized when undertaking this review since it is a system
utilized when gathering information (Saunders et al., 2012, p. 161).

The methodology used for this study was mixed methodology, although qualitative
data is gathered through the focus group (to distinguish the primary credits identified with
quick design utilization), more than reasonable quantitative statistics have also been
gathered via survey Such Mixed methodology would improve the credibility of our findings as
well as reducing the perceived weaknesses of our conclusions (Creswell, 2014).

9
3.1 Data Gathering

Utilizing focus group is favourable when needing to examine a specific subject and the
members are chosen because of them having the capacity to identify with this point
(Saunders et al., 2012, p. 403). I have led a focus group with a specific end goal to distinguish
and get a comprehension for what characteristics a general apparel buyer finds critical when
obtaining an item. This review was performed on the twentieth of November 2016 with a
gathering of 8 members and me as arbitrators. An ordinary concentration bunch regularly
comprises of four up to twelve members (Saunders et al., 2012, p. 400). I have discovered
which traits were essential when purchasing an item, and which qualities that were not
imperative. The inquiries asked can be found attached at the end of this dissertation.

Primary data was also collected using a self-completion Questionnaire (Survey) in

order to address the research question, analysing and forecasting aspects of respondent’s
behaviour. Richie and Lewis (2003) suggested that this methodology is very appropriate for
researcher and participants, as they are able to complete the survey at their own
convenience. There are two main reasons as to why the self-completion Questionnaire
method was chosen in this report. Initially, consumers are the main focus of our study, and
they are composed of a sizeable and diverse group of people, hence it was better to have a
large representation of respondents than it would have been possible using others primary
research methods such as focus groups or interviews. Furthermore, because of extremely
constrained time and assets, a survey questionnaire appeared to be a superior choice since a
distributed survey is quicker and cheap to oversee, especially when the objective gathering is
topographically scattered (Bryman & Bell, 2003). Information gathered from overviews does
not experience the ill effects of questioner impacts, for example, individual attributes.

Secondary research are pieces of information that have been collected for a different
purpose which might be relevant to address the research problem (Ghauri & Gronhaug,
2010). Therefore, the secondary research gathering looked at the Fashion industry market
share and Macroeconomics websites, also looked at external databases such as the ONS, per-
reviewed journals, previous academic studies and reliable internet search engines.

3.4 Reliability and Validity of Research

Keeping in mind the end goal to decrease the hazard for off base outcomes or answers to an
examination address, there are two elements to concentrate on; unwavering quality and
legitimacy “(reliability and validity). As per Saunders et al., (2012, p. 192), unwavering quality
is the point at which the discoveries from an examination is reliable when directing the study
again at another event or by another specialist.

Since the strategy for the examination is clarified in a straightforward and careful way, it is
workable for others to direct the study once more. I have additionally appended the majority
of my examined material, which increases the reliability for proposal and makes it conceivable
to quantify a similar variable at another event. Since I have played out a pilot study this
additionally expanded the reliability of the review. it has both been available at each study

10
event, which takes out the danger of confusing the outcome. Tainting could diminish the
unwavering quality (Saunders et al. 2012 p. 420).
In the review, a couple of respondents were conversing with each other when rounding out
the poll study, which may have influenced and additionally debased the outcome. In any case,
none of the respondents skipped or neglected to answer the inquiries, thusly one might say
that there was not diminish in the reaction rate. On the off chance that I had directed a
questioner finished poll rather than a conveyance and aggregate survey (study), I would have
guaranteed that the respondents addressed the whole survey and are in reality whom we
need to explore (occupants or potentially residents of the Unified Kingdom). This would have
enhanced the unwavering quality of the information (Saunders et al., 2012, p. 420).

4 Findings and Evaluation

This section presents findings from the empirical part of the research. In line with the
research question, the findings are divided into three sections: Consumer interest in CSR,
Consumer Understanding of CSR, and consumer attitudes towards CSR in the Apparel
Industry. The Questionnaire survey reached out to 109 participants, consisted of 45 Male and
64 Female, the majority aging between 18-24 as shown in the figure (see appendix). 107
(98.2%) respondents were aged between 18-24 and only 2 (1.8%) respondents were aged
between 25-34. The majority of respondents normally buy their clothes once every 3 months
and the minority less than once a year (Figure 1). However, there is not a huge difference
between those who buy 2-3 times a month and those who buy once a month (figure 1).

Figure 4 About how often participants shop for clothing.

4.1 Consumer Understandings of CSR in the UK Clothing Industry

it is consistent to assume that if Purchasers are inadequate with regards to data about
CSR, it is highly unlikely organizations' duty endeavours would pay off. Hence, in this report it
was essential to represent the current level of customer understanding of CSR as to have a
foundation from which to give references on Corporate Social Responsibility. Therefore, in
question 4 asked participants if they know what is CSR and the majority of participants do not
know what is CSR. Moreover, 64 (58.7%) respondents do not have any idea of the concept of

11
CSR, 27 (25.8%) respondents have encountered with CSR before, and 18 (16.5%) respondents
have shown uncertainty of understanding fully the concept of CSR.

Figure 5 Consumer Understanding of CSR

4.2 Consumer interest in Corporate Social Responsibility within the UK retail Clothing
Industry

Consumer interest in CSR can be evaluated by Consumer’s demand for CSR

information, as well as the influence of CSR on buying choices, and the importance of CSR in
clothing purchases. Besides, the point is to discover how shoppers see CSR and CSR data in
the apparel business keeping in mind the end goal to enhance organization capacity to viably
impart on CSR.

Therefore, in question 5 asked participants if they consider it important to have

knowledge about CSR in the Clothing industry. According to the results in fig.3 the majority of
respondents believed that “Maybe” it is important to learn more about clothing business
practices and CSR, to be concrete 57 (52.3%) respondents claimed that “Maybe” it is
important to know about CSR. Moreover, 40 (36.7%) respondents agree that it is important
to learn more about CSR in the clothing industry and 12 (11%) says it is unimportant to know
of CSR in the Clothing Industry.(figure 6)

The research review implies that costumers aim to be better informed on businesses
practices, as it could affect their buying decisions. Dawkins (2004) suggested that 3 out of 4
costumers would say that if they had enough CSR evidence definitely it would influence their
buying decisions. Furthermore, it is also suggested that people are increasingly conscious of
the influence they have on businesses as costumers, therefore if effective CSR communication
is provided it could encourage costumers in making their choices. Nonetheless, customers
interest on CSR is slightly subjected to a social desirability bias. Zikmund (1997) stated that
“respondents may exaggerate their support for ethical behaviours in survey situations and
select answers that are perceived as socially correct”.

12
 Figure 6 Consumer interest in CSR in the retail Clothing Industry

In Question 6 asked participants if they consider CSR as a factor affecting their clothing
purchase decisions, and the majority have replied: “Yes, to Some Extent”- which we could
assume that CSR does have a direct impact on Consumers’ buying decisions as regards to
clothing. 53 (48.6%) respondents have answered YES, TO SOME EXTENT. 47 (43.1%)
respondents have denied this hypothesis, however, 9 (8.3%) respondents have replied YES,
SIGNIFICANTLY. (figure 7)

Figure 7 Effects of CSR on Consumer's clothing buying decisions

As regards to question 7 about Consumers’ views on clothing companies taking

ethical/social responsibility, the majority of respondents have shown to be “neutral’ as for
whether it is good or bad to act ethically. However, the majority of respondents claims that it
is important that a clothing company takes social/ethical responsibility. (figure 8)

Cornelissen (2011) claimed that businesses are customarily expected to make a profit and to

13
held responsibility only towards themselves and their shareholders. However, this approach
was replaced by the idea that businesses are not able to operate ignoring outside factors.

Bhattacharya et all (2010) suggested that consumers are the most important
stakeholders of corporate social responsibility because of their power to reward businesses
for responsible business practices. For example, consumer support for CSR means brand
loyalty, willingness to pay higher for goods and good feedback or positive word of mouth.
Moreover, further analysis suggested that customers are increasingly eager to acquire goods
from businesses perceived as responsible (Dawkins, 2004). Meanwhile, businesses that lack
to address consumers’ ethical concerns are risking to be punished in the market place.
Equally, business who are seen as unethical would be the target of Boycotts and protests and
those normally spread very fast in the market. (Auger, et al., 2003).

Figure 8 Consumers view on company taking ethical issues

In question 8 asked Consumers whether they would be influenced by a company that shows
how they work with Ethical issues, the majority of respondents (44%) felt that they would

14
“likely” be affected. (figure 9)

Figure 9 Social/Ethics effects on consumers

4.3. Consumer mentality and CSR/ The respondent’s’ state of mind

The consequence of the quantitative review demonstrates that a dominant part of the
examined clients thought it was good/very good and important/very important that dress
organizations work with issues identified with CSR. Their state of mind towards CSR when all
is said in done is thusly considered as positive. The overview demonstrated that those
respondents, who thought it was great and vital that organizations work with CSR, had a
superior perspective of the attire business by and large. This could as per Luo and
Bhattacharya (2006), be because of the way that considerations about CSR can influence a
purchasers' mentality towards an organization (Luo and Bhattacharya 2006). In our review,
an uplifting state of mind to CSR prompted to a more positive conclusion about the Fashion
business. Likewise, as indicated by Bhattacharya and Sen (2004), purchasers have a tendency
to have a more positive picture of an organization when they can distinguish themselves with
the organization's CSR-work. This could likewise be the purpose behind the respondents
having a more positive assessment in our review.

The state of mind towards CSR among most of the respondents was sure, and this
could be clarified by the compelling part in the Tricomponent Attitude model. The powerful
segment clarifies that the respondents have sentiments towards a specific subject/question,
for this situation emotions towards CSR. In any case, a few respondents addressed that their
assessment about CSR was impartial. This can be associated with the principal segment in the
Tricomponent State of mind Model, the subjective segment. It clarifies how a man, who has
no learning or data about a theme, frequently has neither a positive nor a negative state of
mind, i.e. a nonpartisan outlook (Hansen, et al., 2010).

4.4. The respondents' mindfulness and state of mind

The respondents who had a more positive perspective of CSR when all is said in done
were likewise mindful of Apparel' CSR work. As indicated by Bhattacharya and Sen (2004),

15
client mindfulness is of significance for organizations that need their clients to respond to the
CSR work. Most of the respondents didn't know about CSR. The purposes behind this could
be numerous and one could be because of the absence of correspondence to the clients. As
indicated by Du et al., (2010), it is huge for an organization to convey their CSR work to their
clients with a specific end goal to maintain a strategic distance from confusion.

The absence of mindfulness among the respondents could likewise be because of the
absence of enthusiasm for how organizations function with CSR. Uninterested buyers can be
arranged as the negligent ones (Carrigan and Attalla, 2001). The unaware buyers are the ones
with no specific enthusiasm for moral issues and will hence not look for data all alone. On the
off chance that the issue is an absence of information, there is a huge group of onlookers that
can be pulled in by enhancing the information of CSR in organizations; the confounded and
unverifiable clients (Carrigan and Attalla, 2001). Carrigan and Attalla (2001), accentuate the
significance of clear correspondence and data from the organization keeping in mind the end
goal to draw in shoppers that have moral purchasing aims but are missing information about
CSR.

4.4.2 CSR issues in the UK fashion industry

Consumers reliance in CSR is moderately determined on how pertinent the subject is seen by
the spectators (Dawkins, 2004). When analysing the risks in the Global and the UK clothing
industry Laudal (2010) affirmed that certain businesses are more susceptible to risks
associated to CSR than others. In addition, the clothing industry is labour-intensive and
depends seriously on traditional technology that rises the chance of poor working conditions
(Laudal , 2010). As for the impact of CSR risks on the fashion industry, businesses have been
accused of unethical practices where employees had safety and health procedures violated,
as well as been paid under the minimum wage (Dickson & Eckman , 2006). Other issues would
imply use of children workforce and ecological issues that are linked with the clothing
consumption and production.

Many changes have been made at manufacturing and business levels due to an
increase in attention to businesses practices in the fashion industry. Berman (2003) stated
that retailers such as Reebok and Nike have seen forced to make their manufacturing audits
public through the fair Labour Association. Joergens (2006) implied that American Apparel is
facing a meaningful business growth as a result of ethical practices. Likewise, H&M uses e
recycled and organic cotton as a mean to face its competitors whose products had less impact
on the environment (H&M, 2015). There was an increase in academic research as regards to
CSR in clothing markets as well as costumers’ interest in ethical fashion retail. Costumers are
increasingly getting worried about social and ecological problems in apparel production
(Dickson & Eckman,2006; Hustvedt & Bernard, 2010) however, it may not always reflect an
increase of purchases for responsibly created apparel (Jegethesan & Soutar, 2012).

16
5 Limitations of the study and Recommendations for further studies

5.1 Limitations

Leading the survey online normally delivered an inclination towards buyers that utilization
the Web. As another statistic impediment, the age and sex of the study respondents were in
the vicinity of 18 and 35 years of age. Along these lines, the outcomes may be one-sided
towards a particular age gathering or sex.

The review researched shopper feelings on CSR, it is likely that customers with a current
enthusiasm for moral issues and corporate social duty were more excited to partake. The
questionnaire was mostly made of closed inquiries, with extremely restricted alternatives for
members to include integral data in their own particular words. Additionally, the review
reactions are liable to the social attractive quality inclination (Zikmund, 1997). For example,
a few respondents may have said to consider moral issues in their shopping since it is seen as
the best thing to do however they may not generally act appropriately, all things considered,
circumstances.

Because of such short due date for closing the report, Convenience sampling was picked. This
technique comprises of getting units or individuals that are most advantageously accessible
for the exploration (Zikmund, 1997). Such strategy is utilized when there is a need to assemble
an extensive number of finished surveys monetarily and in little time, which was the situation
of our examination. A constraint of Convenient sampling is that it might need objectivity as
the outcomes ought to be taken to reflect just the particular specimen, for instance, the
greater part of respondents was from the University of Westminster
5.2 Suggestions

Firstly, this review could give just constrained data on purchaser consciousness of CSR.
Considering the developing significance of CSR in the garments business it is intriguing to
examine the issue further. For example, research could concentrate on various organizations
that are running CSR crusades right now and explore to what degree customers review these
battles. Also, more broad strategies for measuring purchaser mindfulness could be
connected, for example, examining whether shoppers can interface organization logos to
specific CSR activities.

Furthermore, as buyers in this review named natural issues as the essential CSR issue to
address it is helpful to concentrate the subject further. Ecological issues are normally a
general classification which was not further limited down in this review because of time
limitations. Later on, research could be taken concentrating all the more particularly on which
ecological points customers regard as generally essential. The illustrations given from the
information in this review could serve as a beginning stage.

17
6 Conclusions
This review created and tried an integrative model in view of macro theories of human
conduct. Examine discoveries from a national specimen of 109 customers in the U.K.
uncovered that universalistic qualities, moral standards, desires of moral conduct, learning of
ecological issues in the attire business, and states of mind all had noteworthy and constructive
outcomes on shoppers' support expectations toward retail clothing brands occupied with
socially capable inventory network exercises.

Our review likewise exhibits that both qualities and standards are great indicators of
shoppers' desires of retail brands' moral conduct in the attire business, suggesting that
organizations can successfully influence esteem from CSR. It is likewise vital to understand
that CSR is increasingly being seen as a wellspring of an upper hand. This shows the
requirement for extra, managed corporate engagement with authoritative partners by
advertisers truly intrigued by really being, and perceived as really being, socially dependable.

Regardless of the inspirational mentality towards CSR among most of the respondents, a few
addressed that they were nonpartisan. Consequently, it is believed that the Customer
Mentality to Moral Purchasing Model should be explained and incorporate a class for the
nonpartisan shoppers. As the model is currently, there is no centre ground between high/low
and as should be obvious, a centre ground as an alternative is required.

Nonetheless, it is trusted that both the Tricomponent State of mind Model and the Buyer
Mentality to Moral Purchasing have helped to clarify and comprehend the explored clients'
demeanour towards organizations working with CSR.

18
 7 Appendices
Survey Questionnaire

19
20
21
8 Bibliography

 Auger, P., Burke, P., Devinney, T. & Louviere, J., 2003. What will consumers pay for
social Product features?. Journal of Business Ethics, Volume 42, pp. 281-304.

 Bhattacharya, C. B., Du, S. & Sen, S., 2010. Maximizing Business Returns to Corporate
Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of CSR Communication. International Journal of
Management Review, 25 January.

 Bhattacharya, C. & Sen, S., 2004. Doing Better at Doing Good: When Why and How
Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives. s.l.:California Management
Review.

 Bin, S., Wang, Y., K.Y. Lo, C. & Shum, M., 2012. The impact of ethical fashion on
consumer purchase behavior. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An
International Journal, 16(2), pp. 234-245.

 Bryman, A. & Bell, E., 2003. Business Research Methods. 1st Edition ed. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.

 Carrigan, M. & Attalla, A., 2001. The myth of the ethical consumer-do ethics matter in
purchase behaviour?. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(07), pp. 559-580.

 Carroll, A., 1991. The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the moral
management of organizational stakeholders. Bussiness Horizons, 34(04), pp. 38-49.

 Carroll, A., 1999. Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct.

Business & Society, 38(03), pp. 267-296.

 Carroll, A. B. & Shabana, K. M., 2010. The Business Case for Corporate Social
Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice. International Journal of
Management Reviews, 12(1), pp. 85-105.

 Cornelissen, J., 2011. Corporate Communication- A guide to theory and practice. 3rd
edition ed. London: SAGE Publications.

 Creswell, J., 2014. Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods
Approaches. 4th ed. London: Sage Publications.

 Dawkins, J., 2004. Corporate Social Responsibility: the Communication Challenge.

Journal of Communication Management, 9(2), pp. 108-119.

 Dickson, M. & Eckman , M., 2006. Social responsibility: The concept as defined by
Apparel and Textile Scholars. Clothing & Textiles Research Journal, 24(3), pp. 178-193.

22
 Emmelhainz, M. & Adams, R., 1999. The Apparel Industry Response to "Sweatshop"
Concerns: A Review and Analysis of Codes of Conduct. The Journal of Supply Chain
Management: A Global Review of Purchasing and Supply, Summer 1999, pp. 51-57.

 Friedman, M., 1976. The Social Responsibility of Business is to increase its profits. The
New York Times Magazine, 13 September.

 Ghauri, P. & Gronhaug, K., 2010. Research Methods in Business studies - A practical
guide. s.l.:FT-Pearson.

 Grankvist, P., 2012. CSR in Practice: How companies work with sustainability in order
to earn money. Liber ed. Malmo: s.n.

 H&M, 2015. Conscious Action Sustainability Report 2015. [Online]

Available at:
http://sustainability.hm.com/content/dam/hm/about/documents/en/CSR/2015%20
Sustainability%20report/HM_SustainabilityReport_2015_final_FullReport_en.pdf
[Accessed 26 October 2016].

 Hansen, H., Kanuk, L. & Schiffmann, L., 2010. Consumer and organisational behaviour.
Harlow: s.n.

 Hustvedt, G. & Bernard, J., 2010. Effects of Social Responsibility labelling and brand on
willingness to pay for Apparel. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(6), pp.
619-628.

 Jegethesan, K. & Soutar, G., 2012. Young Australian consumers' preferences for
fashion apparel attributes. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 16(3), pp.
275-289.

 Joergens, C., 2006. Ethical Fashion: Mith or Future Trend?. Journal of Fashion
Marketing and Management, 10(3), pp. 360-371.

 Laudal , T., 2010. An attempt to determine the csr potential of the international
clothing. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0449-6, 96(1), pp. 63-77.

 Luo, X. & Bhattacharya, C., 2006. Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer

Satisfaction, and Market Value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), pp. 1-18.

 McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. & Wright, P., 2006. Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic
Implications. Journal of Management studies, 7(1), pp. 1-20.

 Pomering, S. & Dolnicar, S., 2009. Assessing the prerequisite of successful CSR
implementation: Are consumers aware of CSR Initiatives?. Journal of Business Ethics,
Volume 85, pp. 285-301.

23
 Ritchie, J. & Lewis, J., 2003. Qualitative Research Practice: a guide for social science
students and research. London: Sage Publications.

 Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A., 2012. Research Methods for Business Students.
Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

 Zikmund, W., 1997. Business Research Methods. In: Florida: The Dryden Press.

24