Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Gordon R. Holcomb
National Energy Technology Laboratory
1450 Queen Ave. SW, Albany OR 97321
Derek Hsu
ORISE
1450 Queen Ave. SW, Albany OR 97321
22nd Annual Conference on Fossil Energy Materials, Pittsburg PA, July 8-10, 2008
AN D
CE
Efficiency Improvements
ST E
SI AS
RE RE
N C
l
O IN
ritica
erc
TI H
sup
DA IT
XI W
O S
subcritical
& AL
current market
P RI
EE TE
540oC-14.5MPa introduction
CR MA
37% eff. 600oC-28MPa
mature 40-45%eff.
technology
Plants operating above 22MPa at 538 to 565oC are “supercritical”, and above 565°C are “ultra-supercritical (USC)”.
Adapted from: Viswanathan, et al , 2005 and Swanekamp, 2002
Senate Hearing “The Future of Coal: Options for a Carbon-
Constrained World” March 2007, Deutch & Moniz, MIT
Improved
Plant
Efficiency
Project Goals and Objectives
• Understand materials degradation in USC steam environments
• Identify or develop viable materials for use in USC steam
turbines
• Characterize the steam oxidation resistance of candidate
commercial alloys (primarily nickel-base superalloys)
− Compliment and not duplicate USC consortium research
• Develop steam oxidation models for use in USC steam turbine
environments
− Chromia evaporation
• Project success defined as
− Steamside corrosion data sufficient for industry to use in USC
turbines (for example in their turbine blade life models)
− Identify and mitigate unexpected failure mechanisms
Critical Materials Properties for USC Turbines
• Rotating Blades • HP and IP Rotors
−High temperature strength −Creep strength
−Creep resistance −Low cycle fatigue strength
−Steam oxidation −Fracture toughness
resistance
−Steam oxidation
−Thermal expansion close
resistance
to that of the rotors
−Ability to be peened −Weldability
Cost vs Temperature
No Materials
Masuyama, 2004
Commercial Alloys of Interest
EPRI Scholven
USC USC
Alloy Class Turbine Unit F UK-US
Boiler Turbine
Candidate Turbine
T92 Fe Ferritic X RR
SAVE12 9.5Cr Fe Ferritic X X
SAVE12 10.5Cr Fe Ferritic X X
TP347HFG Fe Austenitic X RR
HR6W High Ni & Cr X
Haynes 230 Ni Superalloy X X
Haynes 282 Ni Superalloy X
Inconel 617 Ni Superalloy X X X
Inconel 625 Ni Superalloy X X
Inconel 718 Ni Superalloy X X
Inconel 740 Ni Superalloy X RR
Nimonic 90 Ni Superalloy X X
Nimonic 105 Ni Superalloy X
Udimet 720Li Ni Superalloy X
Environment and Conditions
Current Target
Current Future
Condition Advanced Ultra
Tests Tests
Supercritical Supercritical
Temperature 560-620°C 760°C 650-800°C 650-800°C
-0.3
-0.3
760°C 0 500 1000 1500 2000
Number of Cycles (Hours)
Air + 37% H2O
W-Mo Rich
Precipitates
Kinetics
Saturation
ke ( ) = Sh
kg
2
m s Ave
DAB M CrO2 (OH ) 2
LRT
(P
CrO2 ( OH ) 2 − PCrO
o
2 ( OH ) 2
)
Thermodynamics
Thermodynamics of CrO2(OH)2(g)
1.E-07
Evaporation Rate, kgm-2s-1
1.E-08
Ebbinghaus
Gindorf
1.E-09
Actual
Glushko
1.E-10
1.E-11
230 & 625 230 304L
Experiment
Evaporation Model – Some Verification
Haynes 230
0.1
760°C
2
Mass Change, mg/cm
Gindorf ΔG values
0.0 -3
1.9×10 m/s
38% H2O in Air
-0.1
-3
7.6×10 m/s
-0.2
37% H2O in Air
-0.3
0 500 1000 1500 2000
Number of Cycles
Advanced Steam Turbine Environments
Velocity of 300 m/s DOE Goal for
60% Efficiency
4.0E-07
760°C
3.5E-07
Evaporation, kg/m /s
732°C
2
3.0E-07
2.5E-07 700°C
2.0E-07
650°C
1.5E-07
1.0E-07 600°C
5.0E-08 538°C
Current Advanced
0.0E+00
Steam Plants
Typical
15 Steam 20 25 30 35 40
Plants Total Pressure, MPa
Additional Model Development
Inconel 740
2.5E-18 Haynes 230 DCrL from Dictra for the FCC phase
Inconel 625
DCrgb from ratio for IN800 (Paul, 1994)
2.0E-18
1.5E-18
1.0E-18
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
Wt Fraction Cr
0.25
Transient diffusion of Cr given a Wt Fraction Cr
0.20
constant evaporative loss
t* is the time at which Cr 0.15
t =
* Cr
⎟ Model
4 ⎜⎝ ⎟
0.00
ke ⎠
0 10 20
Distance from oxide, μm
30 40
Time to Breakaway Oxidation HP
800 1000
Temperature Steam Pipe
700
Velocity (m/s) & Temp (C)
0.3 m ID 100
300 1
200
0.1
100
Velocity
0 0.01
340 Atm
0 Steam 50 100 150
with 34.5 ppb NH3 Length, m Haynes 230
Steam Temperature
1000000
10000
1000
100
Steam Pipe Outlet
10
SH Outlet
1
HP Turbine Steam Pipe Inlet
0.1
0.01
640 660 680 700 720 740 760 780
340 Atm Steam with 34.5 ppb NH3 Max Temp, C
Thermodynamics of CrO2(OH)2(g)
1.E-07
Evaporation Rate, kgm-2s-1
1.E-08
Ebbinghaus
Gindorf
1.E-09
Actual
Glushko
1.E-10
1.E-11
230 & 625 230 304L
Experiment
Thermodynamics of CrO2(OH)2(g)
1.E-07
Evaporation Rate, kgm-2s-1
1.E-08
Ebbinghaus
Opila 10.3
1.E-09 Gindorf
Actual
Glushko
1.E-10
1.E-11
230 & 625 230 304L
Experiment
Thermodynamics of CrO2(OH)2(g)
1.E-07
Evaporation Rate, kgm-2s-1
1.E-08 Ebbinghaus
Opila 10.3
Opila 32.9
1.E-09
Gindorf
Actual
1.E-10 Glushko
1.E-11
230 & 625 230 304L
Experiment 10.3 cm3/mol for CrO2(OH)2 based on Cr-O
(3.203 ×10 −4 )T 1.75 1 1 bond in CrO
DAB = 1 1 +
PT ( v A + v B3 ) 2
3
MA MB Opila model of CrO2(OH)2 => 32.9 cm3/mol
based on Cr-H bond
Thermodynamics of CrO2(OH)2(g)
1.E-07
Evaporation Rate, kgm-2s-1
Ebbinghaus
1.E-08
Opila 10.3
Opila 32.9
1.E-09 Opila a=0.05
Gindorf
Actual
1.E-10
Glushko
1.E-11
230 & 625 230 304L
In comparison, MnCr2O4 Experiment
has an activity of Cr2O3 Decreased Chromia
of about 0.0006 Activity at the Scale-gas
(Holcomb & Alman 2006) interface
0.5
+ 740 US-UK
0.3
37% H2O-Air
760C 740 Inconel
0.1
740
-0.1
-0.3
-0.1
-8 USC HP
-9 Steam Turbine, 300 m/s
-10
Laboratory
-11
Air + H2O, 0.002 m/s
-12
-13
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0
Log(PO2)
Evaporation at a maximum
at 57% H2O
Summary
• Nickel-base superalloys for USC applications
experience 3 main oxidation behaviors
− Scale formation
− Internal Oxidation
• Deeper penetration and section loss than scaling
− Reactive Evaporation
• Model development—Kinetics, Thermodynamics, Saturation,
Alloy Cr Depletion
• Not important below 650°C
• Expected to dominate above 700°C
H2O (g)
H2O (g)
O2 (g) O2 (g)
CrO2(OH)2(g)
CrO2(OH)2(g)
Cr2O3 (s)
Gaskell, 1993
Nickel-base Superalloy Compositions
Other Alloy Compositions
FCC+A4B FCC+Δ+μ
FCC+Δ
FCC+Δ+Ni2M
Δ+μ+Ni2M
Δ+Ni2M
Mo
30 μm
Inconel 625
Ni-21.5Cr-9Mo-3.65Nb
Ni Cr
T92
Cr
8 μm
Fe Mn
T92
Cr
Fe Mn
Fe-9Cr-2W-0.5Mo-0.5Mn
2000 Hourly Cycles
760 °C in Air + 37% H2O
Evaporation Model – Some Verification
Table 5 – Comparison of experimental and predicted evaporation rates (all on a Cr2O3 basis).
Evaporation based Evaporation based Evaporation based
Alloy Experimental
on Glusko16 on Gindorf 20 on Ebbinghaus17
and Slope
CrO2(OH)2(g) CrO2(OH)2(g) CrO2(OH)2(g) data
Conditions (kg m-2s-1) -2 -1 -2 -1
data (kg m s ) data (kg m s ) (kg m-2s-1)
Haynes 230
UNS NO6230
760°C
-3.46×10-10 (21) -6.50×10-11 -7.00×10-10 -1.38×10-08
38% H2O in air
1.9×10-3 m/s
Haynes 230
UNS NO6230
760°C
-1.11×10-9 (21) -1.27×10-10 -1.37×10-9 -2.69×10-08
37% H2O in air
7.6×10-3 m/s
304L
UNS S30403
600°C -5.68×10-10 (7) -3.79×10-11 -5.23×10-10 -1.03×10-08
10% H2O in O2
2.5×10-2 m/s Asteman et al., 2000
Advanced Steam Turbines – Mitigation Techniques
• Reduce Cr activity Æ spinels
− Manganese-Chromium Spinel Formation
− 0.5MnCr2O4 + H2O + 0.75O2 = CrO2(OH)2 + 0.5 MnO
− Lowers Evaporation by a factor of:
• 55 at 700°C
Holcomb & Alman, 2006
• 35 at 800°C