Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
SHARE TWEET
Suzannah Weiss
MAY 3 2017, 9:20PM
https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/nejny8/fear-of-the-clit-a-brief-history-of-medical-books-erasing-womens-genitalia Page 1 of 7
'Fear of the Clit': A Brief History of Medical Books Erasing Women's Genitalia - Broadly 26/02/2018, 16)23
U anatomy book with one peculiar feature: a triangular cut out where the
vagina would've appeared. It was almost too perfect—a metaphor for
Western culture's denial of female sexuality. It was more than a metaphor, in fact. The
vulva has literally been erased and censored from textbooks and anatomy diagrams
for centuries, and parts of it still are today.
During the first millennium AD, most of our medical knowledge came from prominent
Greek physician Galen, who based his knowledge of human anatomy on dogs, pigs,
and monkeys. Even once anatomists began to dissect human corpses, they were
almost entirely male, according to Brandy Schillace, PhD, Research Associate at
Dittrick Medical History Center. Andreas Vesalius, considered the father of anatomy
for his 1543 book Fabric of the Human Body, thought the clitoris only existed in
hermaphrodites. He also drew vessels between the vagina and breasts because he
believed menstrual blood became milk.
https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/nejny8/fear-of-the-clit-a-brief-history-of-medical-books-erasing-womens-genitalia Page 2 of 7
'Fear of the Clit': A Brief History of Medical Books Erasing Women's Genitalia - Broadly 26/02/2018, 16)23
Read more: What It Looks Like When Med Students' Grades Depend on Listening
to Women
While Schillace hasn't heard of other illustrations with body parts cut out, many
Renaissance era anatomy books contained "fugitive sheets" covering them. Some left
out reproductive anatomy altogether, and others began with apologies in case they
got into the wrong hands, says Scottie Hale Buehler, C.P.M., M.A., a PhD Candidate in
UCLA's Department of History. The decision to write these books in vernacular, not
Latin, was controversial, since that meant anyone could read them.
But for a time when so much effort was made to hide women's sex organs, their
bodies were remarkably sexualized in other works. "They were made to look alive,
with faces and hair-dos, jewelry, and the fresh blush of youth on color renderings,"
says Schillace. Jacob Rueff's "De conceptu et generatione hominis," for example,
features a woman with long, flowing hair and a torso peeled open, giving the viewer
a peek into her reproductive system.
During the 18th century, these beautified drawings gave way to inert diagrams. Male
midwives ousted women from the profession, and two prominent ones
commissioned drawings of pregnant women from Dutch artist Jan Van Rymsdyk.
"Both of these tables did away with the faces and living bodies," Schillace explains.
"The woman is now rendered piecemeal, just a uterus, frequently."
https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/nejny8/fear-of-the-clit-a-brief-history-of-medical-books-erasing-womens-genitalia Page 3 of 7
'Fear of the Clit': A Brief History of Medical Books Erasing Women's Genitalia - Broadly 26/02/2018, 16)23
From an 1898 textbook of obstetrics. By Internet Archive Book Images via Wikipedia Commons
Even as depictions of female anatomy became more accurate, they often suffered
from a glaring omission of one critical part: the clitoris. "Throughout history, there
have been different moments in which the clitoris is 'rediscovered,'" explains Buehler.
One of the most well-documented "discoveries" occurred during the late 16th
century, when doctors began recognizing the clitoris as a normal part of female
anatomy rather than a pathologized one associated with hermaphrodites or lesbians.
By 1901, Gray's Anatomy included the clitoris, yet it was absent from the 1948
edition. Such deletions occur largely due to "concerns about social hygiene and
morality," says Alicia D. Bonaparte, PhD, Professor of Sociology at Pitzer College.
"There's a fear of the clitoris because it's truly a pleasure center."
ADVERTISEMENT
Buehler agrees: "The clitoris embodies many misogynistic fears about sexual
pleasure: that penetration and penises may not even be necessary for orgasm."
Nowadays, you'll notice the clit in anatomical diagrams, but not very much of it. We
rarely see, for example, that the clitoris has a hood or legs that extend inside the
https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/nejny8/fear-of-the-clit-a-brief-history-of-medical-books-erasing-womens-genitalia Page 4 of 7
'Fear of the Clit': A Brief History of Medical Books Erasing Women's Genitalia - Broadly 26/02/2018, 16)23
vagina. Aside from limiting our understanding of sexual pleasure, this lack of
information can be dangerous, says Buehler. Many doctors aren't aware, for example,
that episiotomies—incisions in the perineum and lower vaginal wall sometimes made
during childbirth—can damage clitoral tissue.
Ignorance about innervation in the female genital area is also a problem for surgeries
like hysterectomies and C-sections, says Debby Herbenick, PhD, MPH, Associate
Professor of Applied Health Science at Indiana University and Research Fellow at the
Kinsey Institute. "We know so little about the clitoris that it is hard to judge all the
possible effects and complications," Buehler agrees.
The current standard depicts other parts of the vulva inaccurately, too, says
Herbenick. The labia are drawn as if they're symmetrical, when they're typically not,
and the vagina looks like a gaping hole waiting for something to be inserted, while in
reality, the vaginal walls are usually touching.
ADVERTISEMENT
Books will also sometimes describe the clitoris as a small penis, while male parts are
never described in terms of female ones, Herbenick points out. Some biologists have
even theorized that the clitoris evolved from the penis. Robert James King, Ph.D., a
researcher at the School of Applied Psychology at University College Cork, thinks this
theory is misguided, since fetuses start off with female characteristics. Plus, the
clitoris is bigger than a flaccid penis, more complex, and connected to different brain
regions, and the urethra doesn't run through it.
The view of women as modified men "continues the overused trope that female
bodies are unnatural or abnormal, thereby ascribing normality only on male bodies,"
says Bonaparte. "It once again highlights how and why the female form continues to
https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/nejny8/fear-of-the-clit-a-brief-history-of-medical-books-erasing-womens-genitalia Page 5 of 7
'Fear of the Clit': A Brief History of Medical Books Erasing Women's Genitalia - Broadly 26/02/2018, 16)23
We may have come a long way since scientists asserted that the clitoris was a
deformity and female pelvic muscles couldn't move, yet the view of women as
underdeveloped men at best and child receptacles at worst still haunts our textbooks.
SHARE TWEET
14:03
https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/nejny8/fear-of-the-clit-a-brief-history-of-medical-books-erasing-womens-genitalia Page 6 of 7
'Fear of the Clit': A Brief History of Medical Books Erasing Women's Genitalia - Broadly 26/02/2018, 16)23
LIKE BROADLY
https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/nejny8/fear-of-the-clit-a-brief-history-of-medical-books-erasing-womens-genitalia Page 7 of 7