Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The development of new materials is leading to the production of more speedy rotating discs. The
Received 4 July 2011 knowledge of elasticeplastic response of rotating discs may be helpful in the manufacture and devel-
Received in revised form opment of discs. Using two types of material properties including the Elastic Perfectly Plastic (EPP) and
16 October 2011
RambergeOsgood models, the concepts of failure and limit speed of discs are studied. Different steps of
Accepted 3 November 2011
solution consisting of discretization and imaging process are expounded. The effect of different
parameters including the cross section profiles and material properties upon the limit speed is inves-
Keywords:
tigated. The study includes the analysis of the post failure mechanical behavior of the discs. It is seen that
Rotating disc
Imaging method
the hardening exponent in the RambergeOsgood equation controls the sensitivity of disc expansion
Variable material property relative to the increase of its rotational speed. For the special case of a disc with uniform thickness, the
Limit velocity index of sensitivity is connected to the exponent of the RambergeOsgood equation.
Yield’s criterion Ó 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0308-0161/$ e see front matter Ó 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.11.001
H. EkhteraeiToussi, M. RezaeiFarimani / International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 89 (2012) 170e177 171
1þn n
εeij ¼ s s d (2)
E ij E kk ij
where n and E are the Poisson’s ratio and Young’s modulus,
respectively and dij is the Kroneker’s delta.
Total strain εij is the sum of elastic strain εeij and plastic strain εPij
[2],
p
εij ¼ εeij þ εij (3)
Table 1
Geometrical and mechanical properties in the case studies.
E 3n þ 1 E c2
sr ¼ ½εr þ nεq (8a) sq ¼ ru2 r2 þ c 1 ð1 þ n Þ ð1 nÞ (14b)
1 n2 8 1 n2 r2
The boundary conditions for the annular ring are,
E
sq ¼ ½ε þ nεr (8b)
1 n2 q sr ¼ s1 at r ¼ r1
(15)
where sr, εr are radial and sq, εq are circumferential stress and strain sr ¼ s2 at r ¼ r2
components, respectively. Assuming a disc with constant and small
thickness, Eq. (1) yields, Replacing the above boundary conditions into Eq. (14a) results
in,
dsr sr sq
þ ¼ rr u2 (9) 3 þ w 2 4
dr r s1 r12 s2 r22 ru r2 r14
c1 ¼ 8 (16a)
Substituting Eqs. (8a) and (8b) into Eq. (9) results in, 2 E
r1 r22
1n
d 1 n2 2 2
r ðεr þ nεq Þ þ ð1 nÞðεr εq Þ ¼ rr u (10)
dr E
3 þ n 2 2
The radial displacement u and strain components are related as, ðs1 s2 Þr12 r22 ru r2 r12 r12 r22
c2 ¼ 8 (16b)
2 E
du u r1 r22
εr ¼ ; εq ¼ (11) 1þn
dr r
Substituting Eq. (11) into Eq. (10) yields, Combining Eqs. (16) and (13) results in,
d2 u 1 du u 1 n2 1 1 n2 2 3
þ ¼ rru2 (12) uðrÞ ¼ ðq1 þ s1 Þ r þ ðq2 þ s2 Þ ru r (17)
dr 2 r dr r 2 E r 8E
which its solution is as follows [17], In which q1, q2, s1 and s2 are as follows [2],
1 n2 2 r 3
uðrÞ ¼
c
ru þ c1 r þ 2 (13) 1n F2 2 F1 2
E 8 r q1 ¼ r 2 r1 (18a)
E r12 r22 h h
Substituting Eq. (13) into Eq. (11) and then the resulted strain
components into Eq. (8) provides [17],
ð1 nÞr12 r22 F2 F1
3þn 2 2 E c2 q2 ¼ 2 (18b)
sr ¼ ru r þ c 1 ð1 þ n Þ ð1 nÞ (14a) E r1 r22 h h
8 1 n2 r2
disc is divided into several thin rings as shown in Fig. 1. Each ring is
so thin that one may assume that all material properties are
constant throughout its body. Accordingly Eq. (18) is applicable to
each ring. The force in the outer radius of a ring is equal to the force
in the inner radius of the subsequent ring. That is,
Fig. 4. The influence of division upon the reproduced stressestrain. 4. Elasticeplastic imaging method
Fig. 5. The distributions of some variables in the studied rotating disc: (a) Stress, (b) Strain, (c) Effective Young’s modulus, (d) Effective Poisson’s ratio.
174 H. EkhteraeiToussi, M. RezaeiFarimani / International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 89 (2012) 170e177
Table 2
Deformation of the inner radius versus the angular velocity with d ¼ 0.
Speed (rad/s) 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388
Deformation (m) 0.6537 0.6717 0.6913 0.7130 0.7656 0.7998 0.8454 0.9381 N
(
s
ε ¼ ; s s0 (22)
E
s ¼ s0 ; s s0
The equation of RambergeOsgood is written as [16],
n
ε s s
¼ þK (23)
ε0 s0 s0
In these equations, s0 and ε0 are yield stress and yield strain
respectively, K and n are material constants.
The yield criterion of von Misses is given by [17],
1
seq ¼ s2q þ s2r sr sq
2
(24)
Fig. 6. The ratio of plastic radius to outer radius versus the angular velocity. r ri d
hðrÞ ¼ ðho hi Þ þhi (25)
ro ri
in which h(r) is the thickness at any radius r, hi and ho are the inner
The procedure must be repeated for all rings to modify their and outer thicknesses of the disc respectively and d is the power of
Poisson’s ratio and Young’s modulus. Once again using the modified the equation.
coefficients the stresses can be computed according to the formu- The mechanical and geometrical parameters used in typical
lations given in Section 2.2. As long as the calculated stressestrain analyses are represented in Table 1. The sample data resembles
curve does not agree with the given true stressestrain curve, a typical steel rotor (gears, pulleys, fans, etc.) used in many indus-
similar to points m0 and m00 in Fig. 2, this projection procedure must trial applications.
be repeated.
6. Verification and results
5. Material and geometrical parameters
To study the plastic deformation of different homogeneous,
In this analysis, two material behaviors including Elastic uniform or non-uniform thickness rotating discs the imaging
Perfectly Plastic (EPP) and RambergeOsgood models are employed. method has been used. To show the efficiency of the method, the
The uniaxial stressestrain relationship for the elastic perfectly deformation of a typical rotating EPP disc with uniform thickness
plastic model is provided as, and based on the Tresca’s yield condition has been analyzed. The
Fig. 7. Disc cross section profiles for different exponents of Eq. (25):(a) d ¼ 1, (b) d ¼ 0.5, (c) d ¼ 1.5.
H. EkhteraeiToussi, M. RezaeiFarimani / International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 89 (2012) 170e177 175
Table 3
Limit speed in different profiles of EPP disc.
p εpeq 1 exponent from the linear state, i.e. d ¼ 1, the less is the limit speed
εr ¼ sr s (27)
seq 2 q of a disc. Considering the first and the last columns in Table 3
p
indicates that the quantity of thickness does not affect the limit
At the same time the plastic part of strain εr can also be written as, speed in the disc with uniform thickness. More trials show that this
characteristic is also valid for any thickness of the disc.
1
εpr ¼ εr ðsr nsq Þ (28) Now, following the study of the limit speed of an EPP disc (see
E Table 2) a similar analysis is performed for a disc made of Ram-
p
Using Eqs. (27) and (28) the equivalent plastic strain εeq is found bergeOsgood material. In this regard primarily it should be noted
as a function of stress. Similarly the equivalent elastic strain is that the definitions of elastic or plastic limit speed do not comply
found to be, with a material of RambergeOsgood nature. The reason is that in
power law plasticity any deformation of material is a kind of plastic
seq
εeeq ¼ (29) deformation. So, to have an analysis close to the scheme seen in the
E literature in this paper the limit speed is simply defined as the
Now, the amount of the total equivalent strain as a function of rotational velocity in which the equivalent stresses exceed the yield
equivalent stress is achievable by adding the elastic and plastic strength in all parts of the disc. Taking the radius of yielding rp as
Table 4
Limit speed values corresponding to different profiles for RambergeOsgood model.
Fig. 9. Post limit speed inner radius deformation of a uniform thickness disc (see Table 1) versus the angular velocity in the logarithmic scale, for different exponent n.
a length in which the equivalent stress exceed the yield strength On the other hand, if any line which corresponds to a definite
the relative radius of yielding (i.e., rp/ro) is related to the rotational RambergeOsgood exponent n is identified by a specific exponent
speed in Fig. 8. The rotational speed also affects the deformation of m, one may think of finding a relation between the sensitivity
the inner radius of the disc. For instance, internal radius of a disc exponent m and its relevant property exponent n. Fig. 10 is a graph
with uniform thickness and RambergeOsgood exponent n ¼ 200 in showing this relationship. As it is seen, in a wide range of the
different speeds is shown in Fig. 8. In this manner the limit speed is variations of m and n these two quantities may be correlated by
approximately 425.79 rad/s and its relevant displacement at the a simple linear formula. This simplicity means that one may predict
inner radius ua is 1.92 mm. In this case unlike the EPP material, the the near critical speed behavior of the disc by means of the expo-
jump in the limit speed is not infinite. nent of its RambergeOsgood equation. Unlike a disc of EPP mate-
Now, using the model of RambergeOsgood the limit speed of rial, in power law hardening model there is not an infinite branch in
a disc with the profile exponent d is listed in Table 4. Here, it can be the graph of U vs. u. In this case the slope of the speed-deformation
seen that similar to the EPP material for a disc of RambergeOsgood curve or rotation-deformation sensitivity m may be interpreted as
material any deviation of the disc profile from the linear case (i.e., a measure of the rate of gradual rise in the disc size down to the
d ¼ 1) decreases the limit speed. Moreover a comparison of the first increase of speed. Therefore, based on Fig. 10 for a disc of uniform
and the last columns in Table 4 show that in a uniform disc the thickness the ratio of sensitivity index to the material property
quantity of thickness does not affect the limit speed. index which is the slope of the curve in Fig. 10 is found to be 2.175. It
Here, the effect of RambergeOsgood exponent n upon the limit does not need to emphasize that this ratio is valid for any material
speed of a disc is investigated. To perform this study, the loga- obeying RambergeOsgood equation.
rithmic graph of the inner radius displacement ua versus the
angular velocity beyond the incidence of fully plastic state for
different quantities of exponent n is depicted in Fig. 9. Based on 7. Conclusions
Fig. 9 there is a linear connection between the disc deformation and
its rotational speed in the logarithmic scale. The slope of these lines The comprehensive plastic deformation of discs due to high
labeled as m is called rotation-deformation sensitivity or just the speed causes the radial expansion of discs and increase of the
sensitivity. The feature of linearity in the graphs of Fig. 9 intuits the damage risk. In this paper, investigating this phenomenon, the
existence of a power law correlation between m and n. discretization and imaging procedures are used to analyze the limit
speed and the disc behavior beyond this velocity. Unlike the EPP
material, in the RambergeOsgood model it is seen that touching
the limit speed does not necessarily result in an unlimited level of
deformation. However, in RambergeOsgood material, the increase
of rotational speed beyond the limit speed increases the deforma-
tion of the disc gradually. Our experience of solving the equations
reveals that a disc profile of linear shape has a limit speed higher
than a profile with convex or concave shape. Moreover it is seen
that if the thickness profile of the disc is uniform (i.e., constant
thickness disc) the quantity of thickness does not affect the limit
speed.
References
[3] Sterner SC, Saigal S, Kistler W, Dietrich DE. A unified numerical approach for [10] Jahed H, Sherkati S. Thermoplastic analysis of inhomogeneous rotating disc
the analysis of rotating disks including turbine rotors. International Journal of with variable thickness. In: Proceeding of EMAS Conference of fatigue, Cam-
Solids and Structures 1993;31:269e77. bridge, England; April 2000.
[4] Gamer U. Tresca’s yield condition and the rotating solid disk. International [11] Jahed H, Shirazi R. Loading and unloading behavior of a thermoplastic disc.
Journal of Applied Mechanics 1983;50:676e8. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 2001;78:635e47.
[5] Gamer U. The shrink fit with elastic plastic hub exhibiting constant yield stress [12] You LH, Tang YY, Zhang JJ, Zheng CY. Numerical analysis of elastic-plastic
followed by hardening. International Journal of Solids and Structures 1987;23: rotating disks with arbitrary variable thickness and density. International
1219e24. Journal of Solids and Structures 2000;37:7809e20.
[6] Guven U. Elasticeplastic stress distribution in a rotating hyperbolic disk [13] You LH, Long SY, Zhang JJ. Perturbation solution of rotating solid disks with
with rigid inclusion. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 1998;P II: nonlinear strain-hardening. Mechanics Research Communications 1997;24:
97e109. 649e58.
[7] Gamer U. On the quasi-analytical solutions of elastic-plastic problems with [14] Eraslan AN, Orcan Y. Elastic-plastic deformation of a rotating solid disk of
nonlinear hardening. In: Bruller O, Mannl V, Najar J, editors. Advances in exponentially varying thickness. Mechanics of Materials 2002;34:423e32.
continuum mechanics. Berlin: Springer; 1991. p. 168e77. [15] Timoshenko SP, Goodier JN. Theory of elasticity. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-
[8] Jahed H, Sethuraman R, Dubey RN. A variable material property approach for Hill; 1970.
solving elastic-plastic problems. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and [16] Eraslan AN, Orcan Y. Inversion of RambergeOsgood equation and description
Piping 1997;71(3):285e91. of hysteresis loops. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 2002;37:
[9] Jahed H, Dubey RN. An axisymmetric method of elastic plastic analysis of 1319e35.
rotating shrink fitted discs with nonlinear hardening characteristics. Inter- [17] Blazynski TZ. Applied elasto-plasticity of solids. London: Macmillan Press LTD;
national Journal of Pressure Vessels Technology 1997;119:264e73. 1983.