Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
AN ALLEGORICAL NEWSPAPER
In America, the idea is that if you work hard in school, basically obey the rules,
and try to be a good person, then, you and your family do well and you have a good life.
In America, social status and economic and professional success are supposed to be
based upon merit, namely, educational merit, and not upon authority, and not upon status
involving race, ethnicity, religion, geography, etc. Yet, the American Myth of
Meritocracy is not true, because, you see, the educational and licensing system in
America is corrupt. Recall, that in grade school you were probably required to take tests
in the Spring, called an “Iowa Basic Skills Test.” If the tests were graded fairly, then,
the Iowa Basic Skills test, and others, would be basically fair. However, the parents and
students never receive the Raw Score for each test, but instead only a scaled score. Now,
the assumption that many of us typically make when a test is scaled is that everybody did
so poorly in certain aspects of the standardized test, that everyone’s test score must be
scaled upward. In fact, what they don’t tell you is that a student’s test score can not only
be scaled upward, but also scaled downward, based on a variety of factors which are
basically political. And, what is true of the Iowa Basic Skills Test is also true of the
College Entrance Tests such as the ACT, the SAT, and the MAT. Moreover, this same
type of upward/downward factors is also true of graduate school admission tests such as
the LSAT (Law School Admission Test), the GMAT (Graduate Management Admission
Test), the MCAT (Medical School Admissions Test), and the GRE (Graduate School
Admissions Test). And, if this were not enough, upward/downward scaling based upon
political factors also is used to grade licensure test for Lawyers, Doctors, Psychologists,
Dentists, etc. In other words, the Bar Exam and other Licensure Board tests are rigged
with political factors, having nothing to do with actual performance on the exam.
Now, you might wonder what some of the factors are in grading both educational
achievement tests, college admission tests, graduate school admission tests, and Bar and
Board licensure tests. Well here are some of the political factors used, typically to lower
1. race
2. ethnicity
3. parent’s occupation
4. parent’s income
6. your gradeschool
8. your highschool
9. your undergraduate college or university
14. number of years that your family of origin has lived in the United States
For example, Joe Smith might have gotten a raw score of 750 out of 800 on the
LSAT (Law School Admission Test), but since he was Roman Catholic, and grew up in a
middle class to working poor white neighborhood, his LSAT score was lowered by 100
points to a scaled score of 650. Or, Bill Green, who grew up in a Jewish neighborhood
and was a Jew, and who had a raw score on the LSAT of 730, was scaled downward to a
scaled score of 630. The same is true of a law Bar Exam score. Stan Smith might of
passed the Bar with a very high score, but then, his raw score was lowered to a barely
passing score, or, was scored as failing the Bar Exam. Moreover, some ethnic, or racial
category, or even where your father went to college, say an Ivy League school, could
raise a particular test taker’s score on the LSAT from a mediocre 550 score to a 750
scaled, reported, score. The foregoing system is corrupt and is clearly a GATT violation
and must be stopped. GATT, the General Agreement on Tariff’s and Trade, prohibits
barriers to a service industry such as law, or medicine, which are corrupt or irrational.
GATT obviously prohibits the use of political factors in grading and scoring college and