Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/LPT.2017.2657228, IEEE Photonics
Technology Letters
Abstract—In this letter, we analytically evaluate the end-to- ݄ሺͳሻ ሺݐሻ ݄ሺʹሻ ሺݐሻ ݄ሺܰͳሻ ሺݐሻ
end bit error rate (BER) of point-to-point multi-hop underwater
wireless optical communication (UWOC) systems with respect to ܵ ܴͳ ܴʹ ܴܰ ܦ
all degrading effects of the UWOC channel, namely absorption,
scattering, and turbulence-induced fading. To do so, we first
derive the BER expression of a single-hop UWOC link as Fig. 1. Block diagram of the UWOC system with multi-hop transmission.
the building block for end-to-end BER evaluation. We also
apply Gauss-Hermite quadrature formula to obtain the closed- with much reduced impairing effects, to significantly improve
form solution for the system BER in the case of lognormal the system performance or equivalently increase the viable
underwater fading channel. Numerical results demonstrate that communication range without increasing the total transmitted
multi-hop transmission, by alleviating channel impairments, can power. Moreover, whereas the short range of UWOC systems
significantly improve the system performance and extend the is their main drawback compared to their acoustic counterpart,
viable end-to-end communication distance.
Index Terms—Underwater wireless optical communications,
by employing multi-hop transmission one can increase the
BER performance, multi-hop transmission, serial relaying. total transmitted power by the number of intermediate relay
nodes to support significantly longer distances while maintain-
I. I NTRODUCTION ing the safe transmit power density. This letter, as a pioneering
work on multi-hop UWOC systems, accurately considers all
ODAY’S growing interest to underwater explorations ne-
T cessitates design of appropriate and efficient underwater
communication methods and systems. In comparison to the
of the channel degrading effects and derives the required ex-
pressions for the BER performance of such systems in general
case to quantitatively determine how much performance gains
traditional underwater acoustic communications, the optical
they introduce and how long communication ranges they can
counterpart has the advantages of higher bandwidth, lower
support.
time latency, and better security. These unique features make
underwater wireless optical communication (UWOC) as a II. C HANNEL AND S YSTEM M ODEL
powerful alternative for high-speed and large-data underwater A. Channel Model
communications. However, due to the three main degrading
In order to include the absorption and scattering effects, we
effects of UWOC channels, i.e., absorption, scattering, and
apply MC method to simulate the UWOC channel impulse
turbulence, the present capability of UWOC systems is limited
response similar to [3] and [9]. We denote this fading-free
to ranges that are typically less than 100 m, which hampers (i)
their widespread usage. impulse response of the ith hop by h0 (t). On the other
The primary works on UWOC have mainly focused on hand, to consider the ith hop turbulence effects, we multiply
(i)
investigating the absorption and scattering effects of under- h0 (t) by a fading coefficient, h̃(i) , which for weak oceanic
water optical channels [1], [2]. Meanwhile, UWOC channel turbulence can be modeled as a random variable (RV) with
impulse response has been modeled using Monte Carlo (MC) lognormal probability density function (PDF) [10], [11] as;
( )2
approach in [3]. Also a cellular UWOC network based on (i)
1 ln(h̃ )−2µX
optical code division multiple access (OCDMA) technique fh̃(i)(h̃(i) ) = √ exp−
i
2 , (1)
has been proposed in [4] while potential applications and 2
2h̃(i) 2πσXi 8σ Xi
challenges of such a network, and the performance of its
mobile users have been elaborated in [5] and [6], respectively. where µXi and σX 2
are respectively the mean and variance of
i
On the other hand, theoretical and experimental studies on the the Gaussian distributed log-amplitude factor Xi = 12 ln(h̃(i) ).
fading of UWOC channels have been carried out in [7], [8]. To guarantee that fading neither attenuates nor amplifies the
It is shown that all of the channel impairing effects, i.e., average power, we normalize fading coefficients as E[h̃(i) ] =
loss, delay spread, and fading variance rapidly increase as 1, which implies that µXi = −σX 2
i
. For the light wave with
the link length increases [3], [7]. This distance-dependency instantaneous intensity I , the scintillation index is defined
( i )
motivates the design of a multi-hop UWOC system, in order as S.I. = E[Ii2 ] − E2 [Ii ] /E2 [Ii ], which for weak optical
to divide the total communication distance to shorter ones each turbulence relates to the log-amplitude variance as S.I. =
The authors are with the Optical Networks Research Laboratory exp(4σX 2
i
) − 1 [12].
(ONRL), Department of Electrical Engineering, Sharif University of
Technology, Tehran, Iran (e-mails: mohammad.v.jamali@gmail.com, B. System Model
chizari.ata@gmail.com, and jasalehi@sharif.edu). As it is illustrated in Fig. 1, we consider a UWOC system
Copyright (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted.
However, permission to use this material for any other purposes must be with N intermediate relay nodes in a serial topology. As
obtained from the IEEE by sending a request to pubs-permissions@ieee.org. opposed to cooperative communication and parallel relaying,
1041-1135 (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/LPT.2017.2657228, IEEE Photonics
Technology Letters
in multi-hop transmission each node only receives the trans- conditional probability of error when “b0 ” is sent can be
mitted signal of its previous node because the transmitted obtained as;
power of each transmitter is designed such that guarantee [ ∑−1 ]
a good performance for each intermediate hop. Each relay h̃ γ (s)+(−1)b0 +1 k=−L 2bk γ (I,k)
node operates based on bit detect-and-forward (BDF) strategy, Pbe|b0 ,h̃,bk= Q , (4)
2σTb
i.e., each ith node1 after detecting the received optical signal
transmits the detected signal, with the average transmitted √ ∫∞
(i)
power per bit of Pb , to the next node. Therefore, the where Q (x) = (1/ 2π) x exp(−y 2 /2)dy is the Gaussian-
transmitted data sequence of the ith node has the form Q function. The final BER can then be obtained by averaging
∑∞ (i) (i) over h̃ and all 2L possible data sequences for bk s as follows;
S (i) (t) = k=−∞ bk P (t − kTb ), in which Tb is the
∫
1 ∑ ∞1[ ]
(i)
bit duration time and bk ∈ {0, 1} is the kth time slot
transmitted bit of the ith node, representing on-off keying Pbe = L Pbe|0,h̃,bk + Pbe|1,h̃,bk fh̃ (h̃)dh̃. (5)
2 0 2
(OOK) modulation. Moreover, P (i) (t − kTb ) is the kth time bk
slot transmitted optical signal of the ith node with the average In the case of lognormal underwater fading channel, the
(i)
power per bit of Pb , which, for the sake of fairness, relates averaging over fading coefficient in (5) can effectively be
∑N (i)
to the total transmitted power per bit as i=0 Pb = Pb . calculated using Gauss-Hermite quadrature formula (GHQF)
The received signal by the ith node can be expressed as; [17, Eq. (25.4.46)] as follows;
∞
∑ ∫ ∞
(i) (i−1) (i) (i) (i−1) (i) 1
Pbe|b0 ,h̃=e2x ,bk e−(x−µX ) /2σX dx
2 2
y (t) = S (t)∗h (t) = h̃ bk Γ (t−kTb ), (2) Pbe|b0 ,bk = √ 2
k=−∞ 2πσX x=−∞
( ( √ ))
1 ∑
(i) V
where Γ(i) (t) = P (i−1) (t) ∗ h0 (t), and ∗ denotes the convo- ≈√ wq Q Cb0 exp 2xq 2σX 2 + 2µ , (6)
X
lution operation. Each receiver, either in relay nodes or in the π q=1
destination, performs symbol-by-symbol processing which is
suboptimal in the presence of inter-symbol interference (ISI) in which V is the order of approximation, wq , q = 1, 2, ..., V ,
[13]. In other words, each receiver integrates over each Tb are the weights of the V th-order approximation and xq is the
seconds and compares the result with an appropriate threshold qth zero of the V th-order Hermite polynomial, HV (x) [17].
to detect the received optical signal in the presence of noise. Moreover, the parameter Cb0 in (6) is defined as;
Since different noise components are additive and independent ∑−1
from each other, we model them as an equivalent component γ (s)+(−1)b0 +1 k=−L 2bk γ (I,k)
Cb0 = . (7)
with Gaussian distribution [14]. Moreover, we assume that the 2σTb
signal-dependent shot noise has a negligible effect with respect
to the other noise components and hence the noise variance is Hereafter, for the sake of brevity, we denote the ith node
(i)
independent from the incoming optical signal power [15]. conditional BER with Pcbe−b0 which can be obtained as (4).
η, q, h, f , and L are the photodetector quantum efficiency, Pe2e−b0 (c|U, {β̄}, H) Pr(U = u|b0 , {β̄}, H), (8)
electron charge, Planck’s constant, optical source frequency, u=0
1041-1135 (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/LPT.2017.2657228, IEEE Photonics
Technology Letters
TABLE I
of the real value x. On the other hand, Pr(U = u|b0 , {β̄}, H) S OME OF THE IMPORTANT PARAMETERS FOR THE CHANNEL AND NOISE
for u = 0, 1, ..., N + 1 can be obtained as; CHARACTERIZATION [3], [9], [16].
∑
N +1 ∑
N +1 ∑
N +1 ( Coefficient Symbol Value
(s1 )
Pr(U = u|b0 , {β̄}, H) = ... Pcbe−b 0 Half angle field of view FOV 400
s1 =1 s2 =s1 +1 su =su−1 +1 Receiver aperture diameter D0 20 cm
∏
N +1 [ ]) Source wavelength λ 532 nm
(s ) (s ) (s ) Transmitter full beam diver- θdiv 0.020
× Pcbe−b
2
0
× ... × Pcbe−b
u
0
× 1 − Pcbe−b
u+1
0
. (9) gence angle
su+1 =1
Quantum efficiency η 0.8
su+1 ̸=s1 ,s2 ,...,su
Equivalent temperature Te 290 K
Load resistance RL 100 Ω
Averaging Pe2e−b0 (error|{∑ β̄}, H) over {β̄} and H results into Dark current Idc 1.226 × 10−9 A
Pe2e−b0 (error) = 1 − u∈ΛN Pr(U∑= u|b0 ), where ∫ Pr(U = Background mean count rate nb 1.8094 × 108 1/s
u|b0 ) is defined as Pr(U = u|b0 ) = {β̄} P ({β̄}) H Pr(U = Rate of dissipation of mean- χT 2 × 10−7 K2 /s
square temperature
u|b0 , {β̄}, H)f (H)dH, in which P ({β̄}) and f (H) are the Rate of dissipation of turbu- ε 1.5 × 10−5 m2 /s3
(i)
joint PDFs of β̄s and h̃(i) s, respectively. Since bk s are lent kinetic energy per unit
independent with identical probability and h̃(i) s are also mass of fluid
Relative strength of tempera- w −2.5
independent, Pr(U = u|b0 ) reduces into a similar form to ture and salinity fluctuations
(i) (i)
Eq. (9) except that Pcbe−b0 is replaced by Pbe−b0 which is the 0
10 Analytical,
(i)
averaged form of Pcbe−b0 and is defined as; Integral
Analytical,
∫
−2
10
1 ∑
GHQF Series
(i) (i) Simulations
Pbe−b0 = Li Pcbe−b0 fh̃(i) (h̃(i) )dh̃(i) . (10) 10
−4
Average BER
2 (i−1) h̃ (i)
bk −6 45 m
10 22.5 m
9m 15 m
1041-1135 (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/LPT.2017.2657228, IEEE Photonics
Technology Letters
10
0
Analytical channel, namely absorption, scattering, and fading. Relying on
−2
Gaussian Gauss-Hermite quadrature formula a closed-form solution for
10 Saddle−Point
the BER of system under weak oceanic turbulence obtained.
10
−4
Excellent matches between analytical results and numerical
Average BER
−6 45 m
simulations verified the accuracy of our derived expressions
10 22.5 m
9m
15 m for the BER of multi-hop UWOC system with bit detect-
10
−8 and-forward relaying. Additionally, our results demonstrated
−10
that to reach wide-range underwater optical communications,
10 11.25 m
designing the relay-assisted topology should be of utmost
10
−12 importance. For instance, dual-hop transmission in 45 m and
−20 −10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Total average transmitted power per bit, Pb [dBm] 22.5 m coastal water links, improves the system performance
at the BER of 10−6 by 39 dB and 17.5 dB, respectively.
Fig. 3. Comparing different methods in evaluating the average BER of a
single-hop UWOC system with 1 Gbps data rate and different link ranges. R EFERENCES
10
0 [1] T. J. Petzold, “Volume scattering functions for selected ocean waters,”
Eq. (12)
Eq. (11)
DTIC Document, Tech. Rep., 1972.
10
−2 Simulation [2] C. D. Mobley, Light and water: Radiative transfer in natural waters.
Academic press, 1994.
−4 N=0 [3] S. Tang, Y. Dong, and X. Zhang, “Impulse response modeling for un-
10
Average BER
1041-1135 (c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.