Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
COMPLAINT
6. The subject parcel of land was declared in the name of the Plaintiff
for tax purposes since 1980 under Tax Declaration No. 1631; (copy
of Tax Declaration No. 1631 is hereto attached and marked as
Annexes “D” and “D-1”;
7. Plaintiff has been paying the real property taxes of the subject parcel
of land since 1980 up to the present as evidenced by the certification
issued by the Office of the City Treasurer of Pagadian City dated 6
November 2017; (hereto attached and marked as Annex “E”;
10.Sometime in year 2016, the said subject lot was gutted by fire
including the house erected thereon. As a result thereof, Plaintiff,
through his son, decided to cordon the area and instructed the
Defendant and her descendants to vacate the premises, however, the
latter refused to turn over the property and instead constructed a
house thereat; (pictures of the wreckage of the property after the fire
incident is hereto attached for reference and marked as Annexes “G”,
“G-1”, “G-2”, “G-3”, “G-4” and “G-5”);
13.A case for unlawful detainer was already been instituted by the
Plaintiff against herein Defendant which was docketed with Civil
Case No. 2599. The case was dismissed by the Court in favor of the
Defendant for, accordingly, failure of the Plaintiff to bring the action
personally before the Lupon Tagapamayapa for the conciliation
proceedings;
14. After the dismissal of the case, another demand letter was sent to the
Defendant demanding her to vacate the subject parcel of land with
the assistance of the Office of the Barangay of Barangay Balangasan,
unfortunately, this time, Defendant refused to receive the demand
letter; ( hereto attached and marked as Annex “L” is the copy of the
demand letter dated 15 December 2017)
17.Defendant has been in possession over the parcel of land without any
legal right. In fact, it is herein Plaintiff who is paying the annual real
property taxes of the subject parcel of land. Defendant is enjoying
the possession over the same to the prejudice of the registered owner
of the parcel of land, considering that Plaintiff despite wanting to ;
20.A person who occupies the land of another at the latter’s tolerance or
permission without any contract between them, is necessarily bound
by an implied promise that he will vacate upon demand (Yu v. De
Lara, supra cited in Sumulong v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 108817,
May 10, 1994);
21.Due to unjust refusal of the Defendant to vacate and return the said
land to the Plaintiff, the latter was considered to endorse the said
matter to his legal counsel for the filling of an appropriate action in
court and incurred attorney’s fees in the amount of Php 50, 000.00
and the amount of Php 2, 500.00 per court hearing;
22.This action is being filed within a period of two (2) years from the
demand on Defendant to vacate the said property.
23.That the plaintiff is entitled to the relief demanded and the whole or
part of such relief consist in ordering the defendant to deliver to the
plaintiff possession of the land subject of this case which is described
under paragraph 4 of the complaint;
PRAYER
2. Ordering the defendant his servants and those residing and working
under them to vacate Lot No. 1451-B and to deliver possession thereon to
the plaintiff;
3. To pay the plaintiff the sum of P2,000.00 a month until such time
that the land Lot No. 1451-B is delivered to the plaintiff;