Sie sind auf Seite 1von 1

Sps Zalamea vs CA - NO. he U.S.

law or regulation allegedly authorizing overbooking has


GR 104235| 228 SCRA 23 | November 18, 1993 never been proved. Foreign laws do not prove themselves nor can
Petition: review on certiorari the courts take judicial notice of them. Like any other fact, they must
Petitioner: SPOUSES CESAR & SUTHIRA ZALAMEA AND LIANA ZALAMEA be alleged and proved. Written law may be evidenced by an official
Respondent: COURT OF APPEALS AND TRANSWORLD AIRLINES publication thereof or by a copy attested by the officer having the
legal custody of the record, or by his deputy, and accompanied with
a certificate that such officer has custody. The certificate may be
Facts: made by a secretary of an embassy or legation, consul general,
- Sps Zalamea and their child Liana purchased (3) airline tickets from consul, vice-consul, or consular agent or by any officer in the foreign
the Manila agent of respondent TransWorld Airlines for a flight from service of the Philippines stationed in the foreign country in which
New York to Los Angeles on June 6, 1984. the record is kept, and authenticated by the seal of his office.
- While in New York, on June 4, 1984, the Zalameas checked in an hour - TWA relied solely on the statement of Ms. Gwendolyn Lather, its
earlier than the scheduled flight but were placed on the wait-list customer service agent, in her deposition that the Code of Federal
because the number of passengers who had checked in before them Regulations of the Civil Aeronautics Board allows overbooking. Aside
had already taken all the seats available on the flight. Only the first from said statement, no official publication of said code was
22 on the wait-list were allowed to board, which did not include the presented as evidence. Thus, CA's finding that overbooking is
Zalamea mother and daughter. specifically allowed by the US Code of Federal Regulations has no
- Even in the next TWA flight to Los Angeles Mrs. Zalamea and her basis in fact.
daughter, could not be accommodated because it was fully booked.
Thus, they were constrained to book in another flight and purchased Dispositive Portion:
two tickets from American Airlines at a cost of ($918.00) Dollars. - WHEREFORE, the petition is hereby GRANTED and the decision of the
- Petitioners tiled an action for damages based on breach of contract respondent Court of Appeals is hereby MODIFIED to the extent of
of air carriage before the RTC of Makati. adjudging respondent TransWorld Airlines to pay damages to
- RTC: In favor of petitioners, ordering TWA to pay for the tickets of the petitioners.
Zalameas and damages
- TWA appealed to the CA.
- CA: Modified, deleting moral and exemplary damages, since no bad
faith. Overbooking of flights is a common and accepted practice of
airlines in the United States and is specifically allowed under the Code
of Federal Regulations by the Civil Aeronautics Board, no fraud nor
bad faith could be imputed on TWA.

Hence, this petition.

Issue/s:
- W/N the Court, in this case, may take judicial notice of US Law that
allows overbooking of flights

Ruling:

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen