Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ASPEN PLUS
Product requirement:
The preliminary mass balance calculations were performed by finding the appropriate
conversions and the chemical equations involved by referring to wide range of literatures. The
manual mass balance calculations serve as a basic aid to facilitate the simulation on ASPEN
Plus. The results obtained from the ASPEN Plus simulation is compared with preliminary
manual calculations to identify the deviations
For preliminary mass balance calculations, several chemicals are taken into consideration to
initiate the manual calculations. The list of chemical reactions is listed below:
Main reactions
Side reactions
Stream 1 2 3 4 5 6
Reactor to Quench QT to Methanol Methanol Recovery Methanol Recovery to
Methanol to Reactor Tower Water Removal Recovery to Reactor HPC
Components wt% kg/hr wt% kg/hr wt% kg/hr wt% kg/hr wt% kg/hr wt% kg/hr
CH30H 100.00 33213.37 90.00 29892.03 0.00 0.00 20.00 5978.41 100.00 5978.41 0.00 0.00
C2H4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.60 8549.99 0.00 0.00 35.75 8549.99
C2H6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 229.51 0.00 0.00 0.96 229.51
C3H6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.68 4089.34 0.00 0.00 17.10 4089.34
C3H8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 283.65 0.00 0.00 1.19 283.65
CH4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.60 1673.95 0.00 0.00 7.00 1673.95
H2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.60 1673.95 0.00 0.00 7.00 1673.95
H20 0.00 0.00 10.00 3321.34 100.00 3321.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
C4H8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 5978.41 0.00 0.00 25.00 5978.41
C5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1195.68 0.00 0.00 5.00 1195.68
CO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 239.14 0.00 0.00 1.00 239.14
Total 100.00 33213.37 100.00 33213.37 100.00 3321.34 100.00 29892.03 100.00 5978.41 100.00 23913.62
Stream 7 8 9 10 11 12
Removal Heavy Removal Light
HPC to LPC HPC to DEM LPC toHPC Component Component DEM to C2 stripper
Components wt% kg/hr wt% kg/hr wt% kg/hr wt% kg/hr wt% kg/hr wt% kg/hr
CH30H 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
C2H4 0.00 0.00 69.14 8549.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 64.86 8549.99
C2H6 0.00 0.00 1.86 229.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.74 229.51
C3H6 35.41 4089.34 0.00 0.00 93.51 4089.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.02 4089.34
C3H8 2.46 283.65 0.00 0.00 6.49 283.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.15 283.65
CH4 0.00 0.00 13.54 1673.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46.23 1644.58 0.22 29.37
H2 0.00 0.00 13.54 1673.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.05 1673.95 0.00 0.00
H20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
C4H8 51.77 5978.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.33 5978.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
C5 10.35 1195.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.67 1195.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CO 0.00 0.00 1.93 239.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.72 239.14 0.00 0.00
Total 100.00 11547.07 100.00 12366.55 100.00 4372.99 100.00 7174.09 100.00 3557.67 100.00 13181.87
Stream 13 14 15 16 17 18
C2 stripper to C3
C2 stripper to Deethanizer spiltter Ethylene product Tail gas product Propylene product Tail gas product
Components wt% kg/hr wt% kg/hr wt% kg/hr wt% kg/hr wt% kg/hr wt% kg/hr
CH30H 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
C2H4 97.37 8546.60 0.08 3.39 99.53 8503.76 18.34 42.84 0.08 3.39 0.00 0.00
C2H6 2.58 226.66 0.06 2.85 0.47 39.86 79.96 186.80 0.07 2.85 0.00 0.00
C3H6 0.05 3.98 92.75 4085.35 0.00 0.00 1.71 3.98 99.01 4042.42 13.33 42.93
C3H8 0.00 0.00 6.44 283.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 4.60 86.67 279.05
CH4 0.00 0.00 0.67 29.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 29.37 0.00 0.00
H2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
H20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
C4H8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
C5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 100.00 8777.25 100.00 4404.62 100.00 8543.62 100.00 233.63 100.00 4082.64 100.00 321.98
Component Total Production(kg/hr)
CH30H 0
C2H4 8507.15
C2H6 42.71
C3H6 4042.42
C3H8 4.60
CH4 29.37
H2 0
H20 0
C4H8 0
C5 0
CO 0
Total 12626.26263
Methanol In
33213.37
Methanol Out
33213.37
Propylene product
4042.42
Ethylene product
8507.15
Total production
12549.57
Purity of ethylene and propylene %
99.3926315
Component kg/hr
Methanol In
38000
Methanol Out
38000
Propylene product
7506.49
Ethylene product
5710.78
Total production
13217.27
Ethylene Purity(%)
99.9%
Propylene Purity(%)
99.5%
3.3 ENERGY BALANCE
Name COMPRESSOR(COMP-301)
Description INLET (STREAM 19) OUTLET (STREAM 21) Q (kW)
Stream OLEFINS-07 OLEFINS-08
Enthalpy (kJ/hr) 3506.59 4358.97
Total Enthalpy (kJ/hr) 3506.59 4358.97
The result from the manual calculation was used as an input for the ASPEN Plus simulation.
The feed flowrate of 33213.37 kg/hr was added into the ASPEN Plus flowsheet. Aspen Plus
was set at Metric Units and the simulation was performed. The results from mass balance and
energy balance were displayed in section 3.2 and 3.3. The results were analysed and there was
not much deviations between manual calculation and ASPEN Plus simulation calculation. The
feed flowrate was increased from 33213.37 kg/hr to 38000kg/hr which considered to be a slight
increase form the manual calculation. The total production of ethylene from manual calculation
is 8507.15 kg/hr while simulation calculation is 5710.78 kg/hr. The total production of
propylene from manual calculation is 4042.42kg/hr while simulation calculation is
7506.49kg/hr. The total production of propylene seems to be higher in simulation compared to
total production ethylene because the selectivity of propylene as final after reaction is higher
compared to ethylene. However, ethylene and propylene recorded purity of 99.5% and 99.9%
which is almost like manual calculation purity. The relative difference is due to error and due
to the accuracy of ASPEN Plus in using highly accurate molecular weight compared to manual
calculation. However, the ASPEN Plus calculation was used to perform the process design and
mechanical design due to its accurate data presentation.
3.3.2 Utility Usage
Cooling water is a utility used as cooling agent for heat transfer processes and reactor for our
plant. Cooling water functions to absorb heat from a hot flowing fluid to achieve requirement
of temperature for hot stream. The steam and heat generated from the heat exchanger process
is used to produce electricity. Cooling water was used at maximum rate at Methanol reactor to
absorb excess heat present due to high operating temperature and pressure to prevent any
damage to the reactor and to avoid explosion. Cooling water also has been used as intercooler
and aftercooler for compressor to avoid drastic temperature rises of air. The cooling water also
heated at times to become hot water for generation of high pressure steam at boilers.
Steam water is mainly used to heat up cold streams to initiate high temperature process. Steam
water was flow the region where colds streams are located to rise the temperature of reaction
at required level by transferring heat to the cold streams for an optimum reaction. Steam water
is used at maximum rate for the distillation columns especially at the reboilers to heat up light
components that mixed with heavy components and flowed downwards in the distillation
column so that separation of light components at the condenser can happen effectively. Steam
water also used to generate electricity to run the overall process of Methanol to Olefins (MTO)
process.
3.3.2.3 Refrigerant
The role of refrigerant utility is to supply refrigerant in this plant to cool down hot stream to
an optimum temperature. For our plant , we use water (R718) as refrigerant to cool down olefins
passing through the heat exchanger,HE-303 before entering the first distillation column (D-
401) for subsequent separation.Water was chose as a refrigerant for plant project based on
several factors as shown below:
Water is environmentally friendly as it does not create any pollution to the environment
and can be recycled for subsequent process
The thermophysical properties of water are consistent with a vapour compression chiller
system that has the potential to achieve a high coefficient of performance (COP)
Water is widely available and can be obtained any time without limitation
The latent heat and refrigeration effect of water is bigger than synthetic which results in
higher refrigeration capacity and cooling rate than synthetic refrigerant
The pressure ratio water ( comparison between discharge and suction pressure of
compressor) is smaller than synthetic refrigerant pressure ratio.It will be effected small
work of compressor so it can be saving energy consumption
The refrigerant utility (R718) is used to cool down the olefins passing through the heat
exchanger HE-303 before entering the first distillation column (D-401) for subsequent
separation.
3.4 PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
EQUIPMENT LIST TAG NUMBER
Pump P-101
Heat exchanger E-201, E-202, E-203, E-301, E-
302, E-303, E-401, E-402, E-
501, E-502, E-601, E-602, E-
701, E-702, E-801 ,E-802, E-
901, E-902
Heater HT-101
Methanol Storage Tank T-101
Methanol Reactor R-101
Regenerator R-102
Water Separator V-201
Methanol Separator V-301
High Pressure Column D-401
DEM D-501
Low Pressure Column D-601
Ethylene Separator V-701
C2 Splitter D-801
C3 Splitter D-901
3.5 HEAT INTEGRATION AND PINCH TECHNOLOGY
Heat integration is one of the effective way to identify targets for heat exchanger network
design to assess the energy and capital cost of the design network. Heat integration significantly
helps in energy saving in heat network design. As a result, capital cost and operational cost for
the network design can be reduced. For this project, pinch analysis method was used to perform
the heat integration. The analysis of the heat exchanger network first identifies sources of heat
(hot stream) and sinks (cold streams) from the material and energy balance. The pinch analysis
method is then utilised to perform the heat integration. Pinch technology consists of seven basic
steps to identify the utilities target and hence heat integration of plant can be obtained as shown
below:
i. Data extraction is performed to identify the hot and cold stream from the material and
energy balance
ii. The ∆H, ∆T and mcp of each stream are obtained from the ASPEN Plus simulation
results
iii. Problem Table Algorithm method is used whereby the Ts shifted and Tt shifted is
calculated where for the hot streams,Ts shifted = Ts – ½ ∆Tmin and for cold streams Tt
shifted = Tt + ½ ∆Tmin.
iv. The minimum heating requirements, QHmin, minimum cooling requirement, QCmin , and
pinch temperature, Tpinch are determined from the heat cascade table.
v. The matching of streams is determined from the maximum energy recovery (MER)
method where for the above pinch region, CPH ≤ CPC and below pinch region CPH ≥
CPC.
vi. The utility consumption of every heat exchanger is calculated.
vii. Comparisons of utilities consumption before and after MER to determine the MER
efficiency.
3.5.1 Data Extraction
From Figure 3.2, the pinch temperature is 465 ℃. From Figure 3.3 also we found that total
number of heat exchanger units need for the current project is 2 instead of 6 after heat
integration. It proves that, heat integration reduces energy usage as well as helps to save capital
and operational cost. From the heat cascade table, the minimum hot utility, QHmin, is 0 kW and
minimum cold utility, QCmin, is 422.91kW.