Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
for
LECTURE NOTES:
Exploring the reasons for the event and identifying both the immediate and underlying
causes;
Identifying remedies to improve the health and safety management system by improving
risk control, preventing a recurrence and reducing financial losses.
What to Investigate
All accidents whether major or minor are caused. Serious accidents have the same root
causes as minor accidents and so do incidents with a potential for serious loss. It is these
root causes that bring about the accident, the severity is often a matter of chance. Accident
studies have shown that there is a consistently greater number of less serious accidents
than serious accidents and in the same way a greater number of incidents then accidents.
The results of such studies have been represented as triangles. Many accident ratio studies
have been undertaken and the one shown below is based on studies carried out by the
Health & Safety Executive1.
1
Major injury
Or illness
7
Minor injuries or illnesses
189
Non Injury Accidents/Illnesses
In all cases the ‘non injury’ incidents had the potential to become events with more serious
consequences. Such ratios clearly demonstrate that safety effort should be aimed at all
accidents including unsafe practices at the bottom of the pyramid, rather then just targeting
1
HSE (1997) Successful Health & Safety Management, HS(G)65, HSE Books.
Lecture Notes: Topic 6 2
Accident & Incident Investigation
the serious accidents at the top. In theory such practices will cause reductions from the base
of the pyramid upwards. Peterson 2(1978) in defining the principles of safety management
says that “an unsafe act, an unsafe condition, an accident are symptoms of something
wrong within the management’s system.” All events represent a degree of failure in control
and are potential learning experiences. It therefore follows that all accidents should be
investigated to some extent.
This extent should be determined by the loss potential, rather then just the immediate effect.
2
Peterson D. (1978) Techniques of Safety Management, 2nd Edition, McGraw Hill, New York.
When accidents and incidents occur immediate action may be necessary to:
An effective response can only be made if it has been planned for in advance. Although the
timing of accidents and incidents is unpredictable it is usually possible to foresee the majority
of events and prepare emergency plans to deal with them when they occur.
As stated earlier all accidents and incidents need investigating to some extent. The greatest
effort should be put into:
These types of accidents and incidents demand more careful investigation and management
time. The effort in investigating these accidents needs to be proportionate to the actual or
potential risk. This can usually be achieved by:
Assigning the responsibility for the investigation of more significant events to more senior
managers.
Why things happened as they did analysing both the immediate and underlying causes;
What needs to be done to avoid a repetition and how this can be achieved.
A great deal of information is available after every accident. Establishing what is relevant and
what is not, can be time consuming, and some facts will be of greater importance then
others. The investigators problem is to determine and concentrate on the most important. A
few sources should give the investigator all he needs to know. These are shown below
(HSE, 1997):
Interviewing the person(s) involved and witnesses to the accident is of prime importance.
Ideally it should take place in familiar surroundings so as not to make the person
uncomfortable.
Ferry (1988) 3states that it is impossible to provide interviewing technique guidelines that can
be used in all situations, but there are some broad guidelines that can be used with care.
The style of interviewing is important. It should be re-stated time after time that the
purpose of the investigate is not to blame but to prevent reoccurrence.
A more co-operative attitude will come if management can promote this positive culture
by demonstrating the need to determine cause rather than to blame or punish.
The persons should give an account of what happened in their terms rather than the
investigators.
Questions when asked should not be intimidating as the investigator will be seen as
aggressive and reflecting a blame culture.
Observation
The accident site should be inspected as soon as possible after the accident. After looking at
the site as a whole, particular attention should/must be given to individual factors/items such
as:
Positions of people;
Orderliness/Tidiness;
Documents
3
Ferry T. (1988) Modern Accident Investigation and Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Canada.
Is it adequate/satisfactory?
Records of inspections, tests, examination and surveys undertaken before the event.
These provide information on how and why the circumstances leading to the event
arose. The knowledge, skill and competence of those carrying out the tasks in the
records may have to be assessed.
Determining Causes
It is important that all the information and facts which surround the accident are collected
before thinking about causes. As soon as the investigator starts thinking about causes, the
‘fact finding’ stops, the cause has been found and anything else is incidental. This is known
as the ‘Stop Rule’.
Immediate causes are obvious and easy to find. They are brought about by unsafe acts and
conditions and are the ACTIVE FAILURES as described earlier in the course. Unsafe acts
show poor safety attitudes and indicate a lack of proper training. If the investigator
determines that an unsafe act was a contributing factor, then the reason for this must be
found. In the same way if an unsafe condition was found to be an obvious cause then its
source must be determined and corrected.
These unsafe acts and conditions are brought about by the so called ‘root causes’. These
are the LATENT FAILURES as described earlier in the course and are brought about by
failures in organisation and the management’s safety system.
The findings of every investigation need to be recorded in a similar and systematic manner.
This is so that the report can be read by the appropriate people who are responsible for
reviewing and implementing necessary changes and to provide a basis for communication.
The report also provides a historical record of the accident that will be useful in the future. A
description of the accident, analysis of the causes and recommended preventative protective
measures should be listed. This report or form should be completed as soon after the
accident as possible.
Information on the accident and remedial actions should be passed to all supervisors who
should ensure that employees under them who may or may not encounter similar accidents
are knowledgeable in the events. The appropriate preventative measures may also have to
be implemented by such supervisors. Information can also be transferred in a number of
other ways which are effective, such as through bulletin boards, meetings, inspections and in
particular through safety audits.
Investigation reports and accident statistics should be analysed from time to time to identify
common causes, features and trends that may not be apparent from looking at events in
isolation.
Line managers should follow through and action the findings of investigations and analysis.
Follow up systems should be established where necessary to keep progress under control.
The investigation system should be examined from time to time to check that it consistently
delivers information in accordance with the stated objectives and standards. This usually
requires:
Checking samples of investigation forms to verify the standard of investigation and the
judgements made about causation and prioritisation of remedial actions.
Checking the numbers of incidents, near misses, injury and ill-health events;