Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CANDIDATE NUMBER:
START: 11/10/2017
END: 27/11/2017
TABLE OF CONTENT
INRTODUCTION
PROBLEM STATEMENT
HYPOTHESIS
AIM
METHODOLOGY
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
DATA COLLECTION
PRODUCTION PRACTICES/ACTIVITIES
PICTURES
COLLECTED DATA
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
LIMITATIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS
REFERENCE
COST ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND:
Broiler chickens are any chicken that is bred and raised specially for meat
production. Many typical broilers have white feathers and yellowish skin.
Broilers are also rich in phosphorus. Phosphorus is an essential mineral that
hardens and supports the teeth and bones.
PROBLEM STATEMENT:
Our agriculture class was to carry out a tasked on to find out if chicken gain
more weight if they are fed finisher ration or finisher crack corn.
HYPOTHESIS:
Broilers weight that is gained is affected by the types of feed they consume.
AIM:
EQUIPMENT: MATERIAL:
Shovel Finisher
Rubber boots Red cell
Stove Ctc
Scale Saw dust
Thermometer Crack corn
Rake Water
Cobweb broom Black disinfectant
Hard broom Starter ration
Waterier Newspapers
Feeder
Hose
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
This experiment was conducted on the farm at lunch time, where forty one
day old broiler chickens were placed in an brooder area for 3 weeks,
separated into two pens which one was labeled treatment (Pen T) and the
other labeled control (Pen C). Both pens contained 7cm in height of sawdust,
with waterier and feeders placed in them. The pen, which was labeled T was
given 2:1 ratio of finisher and crack corn, while the pen which labeled T was
given finisher only.
DATA COLLECTION
The tables below and results were used to plot a graph using the following
data.
BROILER LIVEABILITY:
Below is a table that shows the number of broilers that were alive after the
experiment.
BROILER AVERAGE LIVEWEIGHT:
The chickens were weighed once every week until the experiment was
finished. From week 5-7 this information was used to calculate the average
live weight of the chickens.
PHYSICAL OBSERVATIONS:
The broilers were checked every day for the duration, to ensure they were
strong and healthy.
PRODUCTION PRACTICES/ACTIVITIES
Procedure: After the pen was dried an are of 2*2m was blocked off,
then placed sawdust inside the pen and used a rake to spread it evenly
across the area with an height of 7cm was the saw dust when I
finished spreading. Then I placed newspapers over the sawdust, so it
cannot cause the chicken to choke, after testing the temperature using
a thermometer. Then we placed 2 baby waterier after washing them
and full them with water. Also in 1 feeder we placed ctc 10ml per
water filling then with start ration. After we weighed the chickens to
get an average weight, then place the chicken back in the pens.
Procedure: Every day the waterier were removed from the pen
washed out and refilled and placed back into the pen. For the first 3
weeks ctc was added to one of the waterier once per week, after it was
refilled, we also weighed the feed and then placed it into the feeder
everyday.
Procedure: Once every week chickens from both the control and
treatment pen were weighed. Their weights were observed and
recorded on a table.
Procedure: Once every week the wet saw dust was removed and
replaced with new sawdust to prevent the chickens from contracting
diseases.
Procedure: Before selling the chicken, each was weighed using the
scale and sold live.
RESULTS
BROILER LIVABILITY:
Number of broiler
survived
TIME (Weeks) Treatment pen Control pen
3 22 22
4 22 22
5 22 22
6 22 22
7 22 22
25
20
No. of broiler surviving
15
10
0
3 4 5 6 7
Weeks
Weight (1b)
Time (week) Treatment pen Control pen
3 1½ 1½
4 2 2¼
5 3¼ 3½
6 4½ 4¾
7 5¾ 6 3/4
8
7
6
WEIGHT (LB)
5
4
3
2
1
0
3 4 5 6 7
TIME (WEEKS)
BROILER LIVEABILITY:
The factors that allowed all the broiler chicks to survive are: They were kept
in a warm temperature by a light bulb in the brooder area. They were also
well fed and kept healthy, because they had a constant supply of food when
they wanted and also water, which allow them to gain weight and mass
faster. They were also given eletrolyte and red cell which helped them to
cope with the sorroundings in the pen.
The broiler chicks in the treatment pen which were fed ration containing
both crack corn, which was weighed less. In our project the broiler chickens
in the control pen were heavier than the broiler chicks in the treatment pen.
PHYSICAL OBSERVATIONS:
CONCLUSIN
In this experiment results that were collected are from testing of crack corn
fed by broiler chickens. We discovered that the weights of broilers in the
control pen which was not fed crack corn, weighed more than the treatment
which was fed crack corn and finisher.
LIMITATIONS
There were things that could not be controlled such as, the amount of feed
consumed by the chickens and the temperature of the light.
RECOMMENDATIONS
I think that the experiment results would be more accurate if there were
more broilers in each pen. Also broilers should be fed more crack corn
because they gained more size consuming it.