Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
EDL 273
Spring, 2017
The purpose of this assignment is for students to have an opportunity to learn about the
development of a responsive strategic school improvement plan using cycles of the
Plan-Do-Study-Act process.
Part Ia: Plan – Collect and Chart Data to Assess the Current Situation
1. What do the data say about students’ current level of performance? The current
level of performance is low. The data shows that the students are starting without
much background knowledge of the material at the beginning of a unit. It also
shows over 40% of students did not reach proficiency on the summative
assessment.
2. What might be causing the current results? I believe the current results are being
caused by a lack of formative assessment and self-monitoring of those results.
1. What is the problem/opportunity for improvement and why are you selecting it?
a. The opportunity for improvement is to increase my use of formative
assessment and allow my students to self-monitor those results.
b. I am selecting this because I have always believed in the ideal or
philosophy of a student-centered classroom. I have not put some of those
ideals into practice. This is a big step forward in the right direction
towards making this philosophy part of my reality.
2. How is this opportunity for improvement connected to the mission and vision of
the school?
a. This is my school’s mission statement: Engage all students in learning a
challenging curriculum delivered through quality instruction. This
opportunity for improvement directly ties to the last part of the mission
statement about quality instruction. I am improving my instruction in the
classroom.
SMART Goal: For the Human Impact Unit, 100% of students will be proficient on the weekly
formative assessments which are derived from the content plan.
Person(s)
Tactic Metric Goal Date
Responsible
Creation and use of weekly formative 1 formative assessment per 5 formative Begin - Mar 3 Teacher, Students
assessments derived from the content week collected for data. assessments for End - April 28
plan (Human Impact). the unit
Use of proficiency scale for 2 = proficient (full All 5 formative Begin - Mar 3 Teacher
formative assessments. understanding) assessments are End - April 28
1 = near proficient (partial checked using a
understanding) proficiency scale
0 = not proficient (no for all students.
understanding)
Track proficiency data for each Student performance on 100% of students Begin - Mar 3 Teacher, Students
formative assessment per class. formative assessments. are proficient on End - April 28
weekly formative
assessments.
The use of a Plus-Delta after select Students participate in giving All students Begin - Mar 3 Students
labs and activities linked to the feedback on positives and participate in End - April 28
formative assessments. improvements for activities feedback.
done throughout the unit.
This feedback will be used to
improve instruction.
I only have one data point currently which was taken this Tuesday. I plan on taking
formative assessment data each week for the next 60 days. The unit just started
unfortunately. If I see data suggesting that students in my classes are becoming more
proficient over the 60 days the plan is effective. If my classes stay the same or decline in
overall proficiency then the plan lacks effectiveness. If my classes bounce around in
proficiency with no clear growth, then it may be time to look at adjusting the plan. So far
I have implemented all of my strategies as stated and plan to continue to do so for the
next 60 days.
Part IV: Act – Determine the Next 45 to 60 Day Action Plan Based on Your Results
1. What strategies will you continue in the next 45 to 60 day action plan? Why?
2. What strategies will you discontinue in the next 45 to 60 day action plan? Why?
3. What additional strategies will you add in the next 45 to 60 day action plan?
Why?
4. How will you sustain improvements found to be effective?
I will update this Act portion when I have more data (at least 3-4 data points). I did not
want to force the 60 day plan when the timing was not right and with spring break
holding things up.
Reflection: I have seen a modest (3%) increase in proficiency from the last unit test to
this one. This would lead some to believe the effectiveness was not high and therefore
not worth the effort. I disagree with that sentiment. As I compared students who were
not near proficiency from the previous unit to this one there was a very noticeable drop
from 23 - 6%. That means the students who were struggling and never getting those
reteaching opportunities were receiving and them and making strides to at least near
proficiency.
I plan to continue this PDSA into my next unit and into next year until it becomes
ingrained in my teaching. I asked for feedback three times from my students utilizing
plus deltas. The feedback helped me formulate future lessons and change lessons we had
done for the better. This process has made my students and myself more aware of their
progress throughout a unit and how to set goals based on that progress.
Six weeks of data