UNCORRECTED PROOF

Remote Sensing of Environment xxx (2017) xxx-xxx

UNCORRECTED PROOF
A. Kumar et al.
Remote
UNCORRECTED Sensing ofPROOF Environment xxx (2017) xxx-xxx
space
A. Kumar borne et al. observations are also essential in formulating the 2. Site, instrumentation and data
reliable
Remote
UNCORRECTED current
Sensing and ofPROOF future predictions
Environment xxx (2017) (Ramachandran xxx-xxx and 2.1. Site description
Contents
Kedia,
Opérationnel
A. 2013).
Kumar et al. lists available
Moreover, at it ScienceDirect
is
de Normalisation Satellitaire (PHOTONS) and important that any artefacts or in- Manora
NASA Fire peak (29.36° N,for
Information 79.46°E,
Resource 1939 m amsl) is a
Management high alti-
System
Remote
consistencies
greatly
Remoteexpanded Sensing
Sensing associatedof
ofby Environment
networks
Environment with theoretical
and xxx collaborators
(2017) or operational
xxx-xxx from national exacti- (FIRMS) tude regional database representative which is produced site in theusing central theHimalayas
most lo-
UNCORRECTED PROOF
journal
tudes
agencies,
tions in homepage:
and thethe aerosol
institutes,
aerosoland www.elsevier.com
measurements
transport other partners are
(Draxler (Holben to be
and Hess, checkedet 1997,
al., 1998).and un-
1998; (between cated near
up-to-date−algorithms the city
35 and − 100), of Nainital
in thethe formin the state
of monthly
presence of Uttarakhand
of 5files or more containing valid ver- the
A. Kumar et al.
derstood.
The
Stein program
et al., provides
2015). a long-term database of globally distrib- (Solanki
geographic
tical profiles and Singh,
location,
up to 4.5 2014;
date,
km Solanki
brightness
altitudes et
within al., 2016).
temperature,
the The
horizontal study
updated dis- us- fire
Remote Sensing ofPROOF
UNCORRECTED Environment xxx (2017) xxx-xxx
Past studies have emphasized that
andsatellites
uted observations of AERONET
aerosol optical, microphysical arebased theand best tool radiative
radia- ing
tance ground
of ~power and
100 kmsatellite
(FRP), fromprofiles based
fire
the site,measurements
type and
and the the confidence
availability over the levels
of sitefor
3.
A. Methodology
measurements
Kumar et al. from the ground LiDAR, backscatter coefficient (CALIPSO level-1B). Incoinci-
WCT
for broader understanding of aerosol parameters on a global amidst
each fireundulating
pixel detected topography the in
by function theisfree
Terra and tropospheric
Aqua condi-
tive
3.1.
about
Remote
UNCORRECTED
properties.
Selection
95% Sensing of the AERONET
criteriaofdata for
sets
Environment
PROOF
measurements
evaluation
were so of
xxxchosen satellite
(2017) are that considered
xxx-xxx the diurnalto be method,
products dent AERONET the Haar measurements
wavelet within ± 30
applied min toMODIS of the
the total sen-
closest
scale,
the
Along groundhowever,
withet truth satellite
due to itsmeasurements
worldwide use possess
and some
acceptability uncer- in tions
sors.
CALIPSO can
The be of
confidence
ground track. great relevance.
estimate is This
expressed pristine insite is
percentage surrounded and
variations inthe AOD intermittent
and AE (440–870 observations nm)made fall in using the limits LiDAR of aerosol backscatter coefficient profile,
al.,
A. Kumar 1999): al. (vii) Standard error of mean (SEM) = and its first maxima
tainties,
the0.05 validation especially, and respectively at the
bias corrections local scale which
of theetsatellite can be quantified
retrievals by
is the
classified
For thethe Himalayan
period as 0%–29%
October mountain for ranges
low,
2006–December 30%–79% and towards for its
nominal, South and is
systems,
±
Remoteand the± collocated
Sensing 0.2, ofPROOFEnvironment AERONET xxxmeasurements
(Amiridis (2017)al., 2011).
xxx-xxx were Such also a where sharpest decrease in the total 2014, aerosol 54backscatter
good cases
UNCORRECTED
through
(Bréon
available et their
al.,
for assessment
2011;
the period Bibi et
of with
al.,
2008–2012. the ground
2015; Bilal The et basedal.,
AERONET measure-
2016). obser- (6) the
80%–100%
of AOD Indo-Gangetic for
measurements high plains
fire-events
both(known from as
(Giglio
theBL Tarai).et
MODIS al., During
2003;
Terra the
Giglio, past two
bound
Evaluation
each
A. Kumar is employed
instance. etand al. Owingutilization to ensure
to the of MODIS that the
large and
spatial intrusion
CALIPSO
coverage, of aerosol aerosol
the MODIS from
retrievalscoefficient
samples over aoccurs
which complex is taken
remained terrain upin
unchanged asHimalaya
the (e.g. height clear air –DB
(Baars et
clear C6.0
al.,air,
ments
In the locations (Kokhanovsky
present study, et
thethe al.,
quality2007; Hersey
assured andet al.,
well 2015).
– each calibrated, In this decades,
2005).
and , and industrialization
is the measure has
of the grown
variability up rapidly
associated in these with Tarai esti-
vation
other
Ashish
retrieved
Remote
UNCORRECTED
where,
were
Kumar AOD
Sensing
made a, is
may ,from
b, ⁎almost
ofPROOFget influenced
Environment
site in
insignificant two
xxx due phases
and to the
(2017) thexxx-xxxaerosol
presence during
of small 2008).
loading cloudCALIPSO - The
cloud) (within 100
implementation
divided by the km)oftotal were
WCT number identified,
method of issamples and theex-
described sameusing
context,
level-2 it is important
AERONET data that
sets the are satellite
used based
that include latestautomatic release of portions were mating
utilized(Kazuo, a in mean.
their2014) and
inter-comparison. the pollutants The are being
selection trans-
procedure
April
remains
Narendra
clouds, 2008–February
nearly
Singh
geographical the
a same2011
, information
locations (Nainital
during day
etc. station)
and types, night andover August the site. two
pressed equations
2.5. CALIPSO inver. (Gamage
percentage, products and Hagelberg,
and iscorrelated found to be 1993; Brooks, 2003):
Together with the on feature the CALIPSO with94.64% whenAOD a total
and di- CALIPSO 4.10 is highly AERONET
aerosol
cloud products
screening are utilize
and to be examined, the tools such fromas time 1-min to time stability, ported
4.
is Results
based to on the andthesite quite often
discussion
screening and (Ojha et al.,
coincidence 2012; Sarangi
constraints, et al.,
and the
2011–March
The
Anshumali
VFM LiDAR
product
b,AOD 2012 in (ARM_Nainital
LR retrieval station).
process has Out been of the
computeddatasets CALIPSO
of 437 day and was
and having launched
night-time in
highprofiles April
%EE (~were 2006 under
taken a joint
into account. mission
for ver. The of
withalso provides the breakdown of scale
the atmospheric
at finer spa- (R
4.1.2.
UNCORRECTED Inter-comparison PROOF oftruth
CALIPSO versions ~ 0.92) 86.95) whereas 3 it
corrected
urnal stability, the
smoothness ground tests on etc. a regional
The day-time measure- 2014).
4.1.
sequence
NASA Therefore,
Evaluation
and isthe as of the
follows:
French satellitesite
space hasaerosol a great
agency, advantage
retrievals
Centre –National
MODIS to study andthe(3)
d'Etudes
using
collected
Ramanincluding
layers the relation:
during the
Solanki c above feature period, common
sub-types of days
aerosols of reliableand mea- turned
clouds level ofout disagreement
to be relatively between ver. 3 and(R
low correlation ver. 4.10 iswith
~ 0.76) ~ 1% EE
CALIPSO
A.
tial Kumar
resolutions. et
mission
al. Nevertheless, announced the release
while dealing ofwith ver.the 4.10 data
aerosol continental
CALIPSO as well Itasislong range with transport ofwavelength
the pollutants,
a τλAryabhatta
,ment
surementsand of τcolumnar
λ2 arewith the best
Research
aerosol
AOD temporal valuesparameters
Institute atofwavelengths
match at wavelengths
were
Observational selected. λ1 and Based
Sciences λ2. on
between
(ARIES),•
Spatiales
To Manora
account (CNES). peak,
for the equipped
Nainital,
best temporalIndia match a dual between the (550
(Omar
product
Remote
1 eton al.,
Sensing8 2009).
November ofPROOF For algorithms,
Environment the
2016 same and, xxxperiod,
init (2017)
comparison thexxx-xxxaerosol to the higher
value in the night-time
and, of ~ 56.52%. The evaluation of the two versions has re- profiles as compared to the day-time
optical
UNCORRECTED
440
Similar andproduct 870
analogy nmretrieval
isusing
used the
to makecollocated the is quite
AERONET
comparison common sun toearlier
photome- make and additionally
(1)4.1.1. Assessment it provides
of MODIS thecollections
background with values coincident of the
the
b Indian
sub-typesLiDAR profiles
Institute
were of the
investigated selected
Technology over data
(Indian
the were
definedSchoolfurther ofofscreened
region.
CALIPSO
Mines), The VFM for and
Dhanbad, profiles
vealed 1064
CALIPSOIndia (refer
that nm) theand polarization
MODIS satellite
Supplementary
CALIPSO LiDAR
ver. data
4.10 system
overpasses,
Table S1
is significantly referredand only S2).as
theCloud
improved day-time
ver.
some
A.
ter 3,
Kumar
system, the
priori etquality
assumptions
areal. in
utilized ver. with4.10
in the
the release
retrieval
coincident is enhanced
processes
night-time with
that LiDAR the
some- in- aerosol
AERONET parameters.
measurements Further details of the site, variations in for
(532
clear
c National nm)
sky with
conditions. AERONET.
Astronomical In this In
Research all
process the wavelength
the
Institute usable of conversions,
datasets
Thailand turned and
(NARIT), it and
It Aerosol
Chiang
CALIPSO
is observed Mai, LiDARThailand
profiles
that with
about were Orthogonal
6% considered
of the Polarization
‘cloud’ where in the
ver. (CALIOP)
time3 is difference
con-
product
where,
clusion z ver.
of =the 4.10
height
updated identifies
at whichdigital the
the seven
LiDAR
elevation major
system
map aerosol
(DEM) is sub-types
installed,
from Cloud- enhanced version, particularly over the region of this
time
Remote
UNCORRECTED may
observations.
is assumed Sensing
0 lead
that to
The the
of
the Environment
PROOF erroneous
AERONET
errors introduced results
xxx
provides (2017)
and
werethe high incorrect
xxx-xxx
negligible. conclu-
quality data on In meteorology
order tothe make and synoptic-wind
an assessment patterns
of MODIS cancollections
be found else- (C5.1 (4)
out
Article
based
zsions. toheight
1 = and
Sat
be
Info
on
One
37,
the at
high-quality
such
and
geographical
which considered
assumptioncomplete
MERRA-2
for
location,
is
the
overlap
product
the
analysis.
Abstract
surface
unknown occurs
(Vaughan elevation,
(150et
aerosol m,al., LR300surface m providing
2016).
value
verted
study.between to ‘tropospheric
two long term
observations database
aerosols’, is within of
and global
3ah. fewaerosol ‘cloud’vertical or ‘aerosol pro-
A. Kumar
a wider scale et al.across the where
and C6.0),(Ojha four et al.,
cases 2014; on Singh
spatial etand al., 2016).
temporal The data
comparisons sources
In
3.5.
type,order
Keywords: mto
Performance
attenuated match
Aerosols; with theglobe,
CALIPSO;
parameters
backscatter, above soidentified
color The
the methodologies
ratio study and 37 days,
elucidate
the volume the adopted
upon selec-
depo- files
• For(Winker
the evaluation of et al., converted
satellite 2009
ofretrievals and to 2010).
with
‘surface’ The CALIOP
ground based laser
aerosol trans-
and
In
of
Remote
in the
90
going
any Mie fromconsidered
Sensing
present LiDAR CALIPSO
work system
ofPROOF
for
Environment
can be
the
ver.whose 3three
utilized to ver. LiDAR
wrong
xxx by 4.10,
(2017)
the
systems,
major
selection
larger xxx-xxx code
may
science
respec- and
produce
com- al- 4.1.4.
layers’
used
were in
Comparison
(~ 4%)
MODIS,
the
considered. present
are
the averaged
In study
the
MODIS
firstare AOD
two
Terra
described
cases,
(C6.0
values in
the
inDB)
(550 the
ver.nm)
average
and4.10.
subsequent
CALIPSO
withof
Further-
quality
MODIS
UNCORRECTED
tion
AOD; ofAERONET;
MODIS data sets
MODIS; is done
Li-different on the
optical basis
depth of closest
(AOD) over-
measurements, mitter3is theira=diode-pumped
utilization in LiDAR Nd:YAG ratio laser (LR) that emitstranslation
estimation, simultane-
To
gorithmevaluate
larization
tively), and ratio.
z the
modifications = performance
These
upper seven
height
were of the
limit
implemented, aerosol
aerosol
considered e.g. retrievals
sub-types
for
improvedthe from
columnarin
data ver. where,
(ver.
more, flag ~
3, a10%
and dilation
4.10)
measured of the parameter
features
within 30 that
km(scale);
×were30 b‘totally
km = vertical
from attenuated’
the site were (‘no
uncertainty
munity.
A. Kumar et inal.the calculation of aerosol extinction coefficients AOD
2 sub-sections. within 20 km × 20atkm from the study site are compared
pass
DAR;
MODIS
4.10
AOD to
LR;
are the
and-
retrievals site
Radiosonde;
clean and
CALIPSO/CALIOP
marine,
(assumed the Dust; availability
dust,
as 4.5 ofabove
boundary
satellite
polluted
km AERONETproducts,layer (BL)
continental/smoke,
ground data
the
level). during
height
followingCon- ous
determination
i.e.
Previous co-aligned
altitude and
at
sub-sections pulses
which the case the 532
studies
wavelet
have andfunction
revealed on1064 aerosol
that nm. isthe The
transport
centered;
AOD laser β
values gener-
over pro-
filtering
and AOD strategies,
values. changes
Likewise, in the
the calibration
aerosol retrieval algorithms
algorithms for signal’)
2.2. considered.
LiDAR due to opaque
observations clouds, aerosols, and/or stratospheric total,
2.4.
Remote
UNCORRECTED
statistical
clean
MODIS
the overpass.
Smoke Sensing products
parameters
continental, TheofPROOF Environment
details
polluted were on theof
computed
dust,
xxx
number
Himalayan
elevated
(2017)
on of
Nsmoke
xxx-xxx
spatially
region.
coincident and and
The data
dusty tem-
AOD ma-
with
ates
retrievals
vided ′ the
(z) optical
=
by
average
from
CALIPSO
MODIS pulsesthe
AOD of ~from
latest
level-1B
Terra 20
level-2
C6.0 ns AERONET
total
DB long
data with
aerosol
and
within
110
collections
CALIPSO mJ(a)
backscatter of±energy
(C5.1
ver.
30 minatand
and
coeffi-
4.10 are
sidering
both 532 the uniform distribution aerosols between z to z , it •
layers inthe ver. 3 are classified as ‘clear air’/‘aerosol’/‘cloud’ orin
isnm andEarth 1064 nm, and such the revised probability
based on satellite dataobserving demand assumptions regarding0density 1 532
During period from 2006 to 2014, three Mie LiDAR
MODIS
A. Kumar
porally a key
et
coincident al. data sets (N) instrument
obtained as launched
a result are aboardgiven (b)
of
both For ± the
Punjab CALIPSO,
15 min,and
wavelengths. and the
Haryana, in the average
The latter
before of
two
receiver the
sowingcases,column thethe
sub-systems AOD
seeds,average values ofsystems
generally,
measures the
sets:
rine (Vaughan thatet al., 2016). In C6.0)
comparison of MODerate
to the aerosol resolution of betterImaging
cients as Spectroradiometer
the
agreements function with of altitude;
the (MODIS)
ground W (a,
ftruth,onboard
b) = wavelet Aqua and
covariance
is assumed
functions
aerosol (PDFs)
optical forin the
properties CAD three e. g.LiDAR
algorithm. single systems,
To investigate
scattering the maximum
onthe
albedo 18changes(SSA) as
at ‘surface’
Manora peak in clear
ver.were 4.10. utilizedThis may
for the be duetherefore,
vertical to the
profiling changeswith this
ofproduct
atmos-in
NASA's
Remote
UNCORRECTED
in
(i) Table Terra
Sensing
2. To (MOD)
achieve of and
Environment
PROOF a Aqua
valid (MYD)
xxx
comparison
Terra3, (2017)satellites xxx-xxx
between
satellites andthat AOD Decem-
val-
Cloud-Aerosol MODIS (532
fertilize
backscattered
transform LiDAR
nm)
and/or
AOD reported
asand within
signal
Infrared 30 in
their CALIPSO
km
intensity ×
fields
ofPathfinder 30 atbykm level-2
1064burning
are nm
Satellite
aerosol
comparedthe
and the
Observations
layer
residues/leftover
with
two the av-
sub-type
7.5%,
in the Mean15%
vertical classifications
and
bias 5% of
error
features the
(MBE) defined
provided AOD in
= values,byver. two it2007;
is found
respectively
CALIPSO are
versions, the
con-an background,
the ita will
function be interesting scale and translation;
to inter-compare these satel-
and
ber refractive
1999 and index
al.4from MayMODIS (Kokhanovsky
2002 respectively et al., (Savtchenko Wang et et al.,al., pheric
strawsis layer
used. of detection
aerosols The
last inAERONET
selection
cropping. schemes
the free criteria
Past between
troposphere.
studies set (c) for ver.
have±theThe 3AOD
30reported
and
firstand ver.
system
is: CAD
that4.10. was
>score
65%In
A.
uesKumar measured
nomenclatures
fined within etthe for two
respective sub-types and AERONET
overlap (CALIPSO)
wereregions. re-defined instruments,
versions and (4.10
one a ad- anderage
lite areAOD
backscattered
3) products subjected from
as orthogonal
well for(Kittaka
quantitative within
polarization
et al., analysis
2011; componentstomin
Redemann assessat (d)
the
et532 al., nm
analysis
2011). is
Hence, performed the rigorous by extracting
assessment the feature
of these classification
products is addition,
operated the detection of extra surfaces in ver. 4.10 primarily
2004).
Table
Remote
well-known
UNCORRECTED
ditional
3.3.
Terra's
4Confusion
Sensing
BL sub-type
height
orbit
spatio-temporal ofPROOF
is
estimation
around
matrix
Environment
included
the
showing Earth
averaging
in productxxxtheis
level ‘Aerosol
(2017)so timed
technique
of
ver. agreementxxx-xxx
4.10.
that
sub-type’
is
The
it passes
adopted
with
change
expressed
the quality of
± (between
(Winker
2012;
thein
15 minannual
assured
Bibi etduring
percentage,
ofet −
al.,the 352009
level-2
al.,
2006–2008
to −
fire-events
closest
2015).
asand 100),
ground occurring
obtained
Terra/Aqua
2010;
The
(Hegde
Extinction
based from
Hunt
CALIPSO
in et437
QC
overpass
et
AErosol
al.,day
these
al.,
ver.
2009),
532 areas
2009). flagand
and
occurrences.
RObotic
4.10 is most
(0 or
come
night-timethe
NET-
1),
from sec-
recent
col- CALIPSO VFM p
flag (FCF) of each detected layer from the VFM files for the happened due to the increase in the DEM resolution from 30
essential
from North
sification, is the for
etusing
studies
measure
to South ver. 3across on of aerosol
and theoverall distribution.
bias
thecolumns
Equator error and
(descending
representing the values node)
the > 0 in-
in From
toclassification
is
ond
At the
umn
agriculture Haar
system optical
using
present,
the
wavelet
between
based
ver.
the
statistics depth 4.10. function,
2010
onuncertainty
burnings
researchers the and
and described
the
(between
mainly
worldwide, mid as
of
during
are a
2011 symmetrical
0utilizing
and (Bangia
0.5the
March–May × AOD), et andto
al.,
(Ichoku
A.
in
The Kumar
the
CALIPSO et
BLnomenclatures
height al., al.2002)
transacts is an andfrommultiple
important
within ‘polluted
the
metrics
work
meteorological
defined continental’ wereparameter
(AERONET)
geographical
utilized
andmeasurements
‘smoke’
region
quan-
that of product
15
over
arc sec.
Manora
being explored peak onfour
(29.36° the spatio-temporal
N,
regional79.46°E), scale, a high combinations,
particularly, altitudeover
Furthermore,
the
DAY dicate
morning,
+ NIGHT the
overestimation,
while regional
Aqua climate,
passeswhereas Southparticularly,
the tovalues
Aerosol North along
<over
sub-type, 0 repre- the
the ver slopes
Equa- square
2011).CALIOP
4.10October–December wave
The initial with
third system positive
LR to = final
(Singh named and
LR,
and negative
as LiDAR
surface
Panigrahy, going for
elevation 2011; amplitudes;
Atmospheric>Vijayakumar
1200with m,zal-
tify
Remote the results.
Sensing TakingofPROOF into
Environment account xxx
site the (2017)
informean
the MODIS
xxx-xxx
Himalayas. AOD Analysisval- CALIPSO
as given
revealed inproducts
Table
that the2,AOD case a great
from(c) is extent
the found
latest intoorder
perform
MODIS to understand
better
Terra C6.0 the
t
UNCORRECTED
determines
in ver.
28.86°–29.86° 3 to ‘polluted
the N extent
and to which
continental/smoke’
78.96°–79.96° the dispersion
E and the ‘elevated
of
period pollutants,of smoke’,
August Himalayan
To illustrate region.
some Hence,
of the majorto assess
changes the improvements
in the vertical ′ re-
features
of the
tor sentmountain
(ascending underestimation regions,
node) in the isofbeing the
afternoon. greatly
satellite MODIS affected
retrieved due
satellite AODs topasses
the
with and
Measurement
and z are
the the
horizontal top
and and
Probing
Polluted bottom
averaging (LAMP) altitudes
continental/≤ 80 iskm an of β
upgraded
(Young
Clean and (z).
version
Vaughan, of Elev
kmetimpact al., 2016).
ofthe aerosol Considering and cloud the on factthethat Earth's both the
radiation states have
budget.
b total, 532
ues
study
A. within
Kumar have et20 inkm
been
al. ×take 20 km
provided and
bytothe 30 km
GMAO
deep ×blue 30 at kmNASA
(DB) grid 30 and
Goddard
km × 30for most and VFMall
CALIPSO metrics ver. in4.10 good agreement
Vertical
(overpass feature
within as compared
~ mask100 kmused to
dis- other
heat
2006–April
Fig. 3.
deleterious
over
and
respectively
the
the
moisture
CALIPSO
ground
study 2017. ver.
anthropogenic The
truth.
region
4.10
(ver. twice3place,
are
vertical
and and
overcome
feature
4.10)
interventions.
a day
is
and
very
Not
type,
derived Theuseful
the
determined
specifically,with
aerosol aparameter
misclassification
preliminary confidenceClean
sub-types
Terra as-marine forported
between
For
the (a) 12inone
Dust
retrieval
first
2009; Mayver.
the
Vaughan
4.10
CALIPSO
2016,
of
and BLwas
over
07:39
height
smoke
et made
al.,
the
versions,
UTC
with
2016).
established
(~ four
high
operational 13:09
degree
and
typical widely
of transacts
h continental
since LT), (b) 24
accuracy
October on
April using
2011 26 Polluted dust
2015, smo
AERONET
Space Flight AOD Center. averaged The overstudies
authors ±xxx 30 (2017)
min
gratefully
tance) and ±
a 15
acknowledge min, vari-
the strong
The
three w.r.t.agricultural
CALIPSO/CALIOP
cases.
(Rh ≥ Since, base
MODIS with
(ver. >3
Terra 60%
and
with are of
4.10)
showsrespectagricultural
aerosol
high to lands,
products
correlation the
(R in-
Remote
weather,
observed
07:38
level
sessment ofUTCatSensing
climate
under
(~climate
least
of 13:08 of Environment
and
certain
‘medium’ h pollution
change circumstances
LT), (c)with
i.e. 50 09 ≤impact
September
| CAD asare
(Monks score
studies
in
xxx-xxx
reported et
2006, very
al.,70
|while
<
on in20:30good
2009).
earlier
for UTC
tempera-
agreement
In (~ CALIPSO
March
the 02:00
WCT 2015, ver.
LT),
method,
0.9)
013, and with
both
December
it (d)
is
that29 from
the
essential
versions
2007,
April coincident
2016,
that08 August
the20:34 AERONET
compared
dilation, 2013,
UTC ‘a’
with
(~ and mea-
02:04
should
MODIS
08much hJune
be LT), for
(ii)
crosses
Aerosol Average between
sub-type, error 10:00–11:00
ratio (AER) h local
= surements time (LT), Aqua be- (Solanki
3.2.
formation
used
~ 0.90) LR
in et
this
and al.,
estimations
may study
high 2013;
be useful
are:
%EE Solanki
(~Thein62) the and presentSingh,
inofcomparison 2014).
context to ofLAMP
Aqua increased is
(R retrieval
~ 0.75,
data
ous
Hegde,
this
studies from
cases
context,P.,
(PowellLANCE
on
Pant,
an P.,FIRMS
spatio-temporal
accurate
et al., Bhavani
2009; operated combinations
Kumar,
determination
Adams byNilY.,the
of2009. NASA/GSFC/Earth
BL were AnThe
height,
averaged examined
integrated
usingover the Appendix
dif- AOD
Remer,
span as
of B.
±given
L.A., 30 Supplementary
et by
min. al., Fig. 2002.
About 5. 77% data
Validation
AOD the retrievals
of
AOD MODIS from
retrieved aerosolCALIPSO
using
the
ture
aerosol
tween
ver. altitudes
3and andrainfall,
13:00–14:00 between
cloud Not
snow layers
h −determined
LT. 0.5
cover km and
(confirmed
MODIS 8.2et
toglaciers,
Terra using al.,
km. and
2012).
biodiversity,
FCF Aqua 4 Nil
bitssatellites inclusion
andstreams 2007
5), is carefully
more Nilwere
compact chosenselected, Nil
monostatic
(Brooks, and theversion
2003). results are
ofsmallthe presented
Atground-based Nil
first
dilation oneLiDAR and in
value, Fig.
is is due Nilto
2a–d. Nil
Science
and
analysis the Data
levels
of lidar and Information
ofobservations
agreement were
inSystem (ESDIS)
established.
association with andoptical the NASA
proper- ■
The
AOD
%EE
product
over
LR
Supplementary and
~
Level-1B
ocean.
for
54)
ver.
any
highwith
products
Geophys.
4.10,
single
concentration
ground
data wavelength
demonstrated based
to(temporal
this article
Res.
of
Lett.
fine
AERONET can
resolution:
better
29
mode
(12), be aerosol
measurements.
found
correlation
2–5. online
0.05https://doi.org/
s, particles
vertical
(R ~ at0.79)
aon
https:
and
of
and ‘dusty
ferent data
rivers, sources
marine’
byagriculture in over
ver. and the
4.10 complex
otherinis to MODIS high
distinguish
sectors and altitude
conducted ~
it 87%
from site,
by from
the where
cleanCALIPSO
state of It can were found to be within the expected error (EE) limits.
obtained
view thebeing entire decoding Earth's Clean the FCF
marine
surface bitsevery1–3 Nilin 1 todecimal
2 days, form Nil
acquiring equipped
the
key
10 Nilbe inferred
spurious
parameter
N11.
Therefore, with
one RS-232
gradients
that
has
from
Nilneeds
to30
the
andto
essentially
figure
Ethernet
noisy
be known that
Wf (a, in forver.
interfaces,
b)upon 4.10
profile,
Nil
the there
built-in
retrieval itmost
becomes is anNil
ofsuit- Nil
Langley
MODIS
ties
the
marine of
upslope Research
, isaerosols
the
aerosol, and the
measure from Center
passive
downslope
and aofhigh
is the Atmospheric
remote
applicable altitude
airflows
comparison sensor
The
for location
varyAOD
the Science
provides
with
between
cases in time,
comparison Data
central
wherethe ais Center
single
Hi-
of
actual
the great
between
ma- //doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.12.019.
spatial
er- 10.1029/2001GL013204.
and MODISreduced resolution:
Terra MRD C6.0 (~ 31.3%)
DB m and (0–8.2 withdecide
CALIPSO km)
MODIS and ver. 333
AOD, 4.10,
the
m) assug- compared
Uttarakhand
(Vaughan
data sincevalue etMarchhave
al., 2016).been
Dust
2000 reported
The changes
for parameter,
Terra, (Mishra,
and w.r.t.
Nil
July 2014;
ver.
2002 3, UCOST
as
forthe Aquaobserved
Nil and enhancement
acousto-optic
very
aerosol
in 36 References
The difficult
75.50%
type vertical to
of aerosol in the
modulator
estimate
0.65%
profiles. feature for
the
Basically,
andretrievals detection
Q-switching
correct
the sources it BLis (Fig.
have and
height,
the 2a–c)
0.13%
ratio
been highandof as
quality
assignedat
aerosolcompared
extremely opti-23.43%
ex-
using 0.29
for providing
columnar
malayas. Atmos. the of necessary
Sci.aerosol
| Lett. | data.
10, ≤ 48–57.NOAA which Air Resources
lacks
https://doi.org/10.1002/ Labora-
informa- able
■ the
to
Remer, collection
CALIPSO
L.A., etofal., Terra
ver. 2005.3. It indicates
TheHimalayas.
MODIS out that ofaerosol
C5.1
the AOD DT, C6.0 DTprod-
algorithm,
retrievals and
interest.
rine
USERC, ror and
aerosols From
2012). the
areManoraEE. AER
contaminated
However, peak there site,1 isthe
with
are the
gested radiosonde
dust
a good
very their
and match,
limited launches
synergic
anthropogenic and
studies use fo- for aerosol
to Level-2
ver.3. characterization
products:
Surface detection over is typically higher In comparison
in ver. 4.10 toasfrom
in ver.
spectral 4.10bands are explained
between Polluted 0.4 by constructing
and 14.4 μm. a
The confusion
acquired matrix
MODISthe as cal
high
tinction assemblies.
dilation
ground coefficient value,
andProspero, Table the 1
(αaer) based
satellite BLsummarizes
and heightthe becomes
aerosol
measurements the major too
backscatter differences
high
as mentioned or some-
coefficient in
tory
tion
asl.209.
were are
of also
aerosol
conducted >be thankful
1vertical
four times forathe
distribution, providing
dayofduring
thea match.the2011–2012
rather
ver. provision
3, important
CALIPSO for
(Singhrunning
parame-
ver. et C6.0
4.10 Adams,
CALIPSO
ucts,
is found
DB.
and A.M.,
validation.
to ver.
have 4.10 can
undergoneJ. Atmos. J.M.,
be used Zhang,
Sci.in 62,
substantial synergyC., 2012.
947–973.
changes, withCALIPSO-de-
MODIS
https://doi.org/
and their Terra
given|are
pollution.
cusing
data
AER
inon the | Table
the
available
long represents
term
3. Theimpacts
continental
in the overallpoor
hierarchy agreement
of
Nil
aerosols
levels
In
on case
between
(level-1
Himalayan of
to
Nilsatellite
ver.
4) 3
and
-time
compared
among
(β
the
Inaer
0.39%
) may
Aerosol
that
previous
order all to
the
even
is
toover
ver.
profile
linkedthree
get
paragraphs.
achieve
65.24%
3, and
versions
missed.
(temporal
to the
the reasonable
the same
of
Therefore,LiDAR
resolution:
regional
Further isconfirm
aerosol
to evident
systems.
the
5.92
1.40%
BL inheight
s,
characteristics
the the All
vertical figure.
transport LiDAR
estimated
and like
of
25.51%
Itsys-
is
spa-the
7.46
the
ter
Hersey,
al.,
To HYSPLIT
to quantify
2016),
data,
understand S.P., so
AER transport
aerosol
Garland,
taking<
the 0 this
represents
changes and
effects
R.M.,
an dispersion
inunderestimation
advantage,
over the
Crosbie, long
the model
atmosphere.
E.,
regionand
term Shingler, used
considering Inthe
inter-comparison
specifiedof in
this
T., this
mea-
here, con-
the man-the in rived
C6.0
the gridthree-dimensional
10.1175/JAS3385.1.
DB, 28.86°-29.86° this region. N structure
and In general, ofassessment
78.96°–79.96° aerosol
the over
correlation
E
with
revealedthethe Atlantic
values ground es-
ecosystem,
and ver. 4.10 due in broad toClean
this lackcase ofcontinental
high
is resolution
computed – reviewers
Nil ground
byatmosphere,
summing based the Nil mea- also tems
from
shape, tialvisible
at
the
0.13% themean
resolution:
size that
study some
profile
andoriginating site
60
42.47% mof of×wavelet
were the
5from ‘clouds’
operated
km) covariance and
in ‘clear
late-evening
29.60% air’
transform,< features
hours W fun-
12.16%in 15.6
grouped
uscript.
text,that the in box
Thanks four
CALIPSO to the
satellitedisciplines
anonymous land, and handling ocean edi- smoke
truth,
basin the
andplumes study
adjacent incomposition.
casecontinents.(c) is A-priori
the
extended
J. Clim. hypotheses
aforementioned
for
25, 1746862–6879.coincidentforregions,
LRhttps://
inAOD the
Fig.
fact
FCF
surements
6.
Sorooshian,bitsLR
surement, BL
10–12 A.,plot
depth
(Mal Piketh,
and
that can
etPolluted
and
AER
al., definesbeS.,
2016). 0products
statistics
Burger,
>derived reveals
the derived
R.,
from
that
aerosol
Studies
were 2015.
the also
using
overestimation.
their
focused An
radiosonde
vertical
sub-types on
evaluated
LiDAR
overview
feature
are
Himalayan
and and
of
(Seibert
decoded (a)
and re-AERONET,
timated
Remer,
aerosol L.A.,
between
sub-types (b)Mattoo,
MODIS MODIS
are S.,
in Terra Levy,
and
agreement C5.1
CALIPSO
R.C., DT, of ~(c)
Munchak,are MODIS
94.6% relatively
L.A.,
and Terra 2013.
lowerC6.0 asDT,
and cryosphere. The collections dust are Nil
also defined in Nil
MODIS der
(b)>,
ver.
-
range
5-days cloud
3
measurementsgenerated
are
13.20%
between
air free
changed
mass conditions
20across
6.15%
available to
and
backward ‘tropospheric
the
100 on
duringsrthe
mid-range
is
trajectoriesdays
quite
2008–2010. considered
of
aerosols’
common,dilation
analysis0.69% in
Each but
using in
values,
ver. of this
LR4.10 study,
is
com-
HYSPLIT
the threecon-
(Fig.
77.62% 2.34
tor-in-chief for
BL their insightful and Aerosol layer (temporal resolution: 0.74 s,global spatial resolution:
used
and
et
(iii)
afteral.,(d)
gional
region
in thelocal
MODIS
and
2000;
confirming
Root aremean ofSingh
height
Terra
paramountthe
square et estimation
C6.0
characteristics
al.,
feature 2016)
error DB.
type
importance, of
and
as
(RootMSE)~constructive
andaerosols case studies
CALIPSO
68.6%,
aerosol
as the – It in comments,
isSouth
data
respectively.
with the
occurrencestheon Africa
(Jordan
quality
root mean
sug-
theUtilizing
evo-
ofus- et MODIS
as- doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00672.1.
compared
and thethe
sidered AOD 3 km
data
as
with aerosol
retrievals
the
the
acquired
optimum
AERONETproduct:
from is BL AERONET
presented
height
algorithm
measurements
in andand
collectively.
the MODIS
present
individually. perspec-
collec-
work, which
This
is
data that represent Smokethe versions of order
MODISNil data production Nil 2c–d).
puted
model
al- Amiridis, 0.80%by
is constraining
carried 45.89%
out. The the AOD
trajectories from LiDAR
between 0.59% through0.5 and AERONET1.5 23.98%
km 28.7
gestions,
lution
ing
al.,
surance 2010;
cloudbursts,
and
satellite,
square
and
transport encouragement.
ground,
McGrath-Spangler
level of as
flashthe “high” ofand
floods,
error
aerosols.
(FCF
in
modeling and
landslides
the bitThis
In manuscript
data.
Denning,
tions,
13)
regression, in both
etc. the to
Atmos.
have
understand
2012),
iteratively has
Chem.
theincreased
computed anbeen
CALIPSO as
the
Phys.
attempt
computedover
the
as-
ver- is collections
may
tive. 5 km)
LR for Atmos.
bethree V.,isMeas.
attributed subjected
Balis,
LiDAR toD.,
Tech.
certain
systems
to6one-one
Giannakaki, (7),
limitations
was 1829–1844.lineKazadzis,
E.,
found
comparison
and to be uncertainties S., with
https://doi.org/10.
lower Arola,
(< 16) asso- A.,
Table
gorithm 3Confusion
(Savtchenko matrix
Others etbyal., showing
2004; the
Remer ‘Tropospheric
Nil et al., 2005). feature
NilIn the type’ 2.3.
expressed
or
above MODISAERONET
expressed
Nilground as: inlevel
measurements measurements
percentage,
Nil are drawn can asandbe obtained
the better
projected from
Nil choice437
over day
the than and
fire former
den-Nil Nil
helped
sociated immeasurably
changes (vertical allfeatures
of their contributions
and aerosol and
sub-types) we very AERONET
-ciated
Gerasopoulos, AOD E., values
2011. as shown
Characterization in Fig. 1. ofFrom the the
aerosol figure, type it
15,
made
sions.
the 4259–4278.
regionto
The
square estimate
confusion
due roottoofthe
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4259-2015.
and the compare
matrix
human's
reduced the
is formed duringBL(Table
overexploitation
Chi-square height
winter i.e.4)computed
and
oftonatural
showhigher from
the
re-(>in43)5194/amt-6-1829-2013.
The
Vertical
during with
AERONET summer.the
feature sensors mask
Study
program
depending
(VFM)
on is
product
theinclusive
an BL upon
height the
(temporal prevailing
estimations
federation
resolution:
of
weather
sug-
night-time
Fig.
present
much
the 12.
two work,
appreciate
versionsCALIPSO
Temporal level-2 Total
the1998.
(ver. VFM
vertical
MODIS
generosity profiles,
profile
3observations
and aerosol
4.10) of with
ofgested the
their
of 0 rows
(a)
collections
CALIPSO time. LiDARrepresenting
We data(C5.1
appreciate 0
range-corrected
over and the
com- classification
(He
sity
using 1,018,494
et
signal
plot
is evident al.,as
simultaneous using
2006).
(RCS)
displayed
that MODIS ver.
482,243
In
for the
the in 3 and
later
observation
Fig.
Terra
measurements the
approach,
11,
C5.1 columns
whichDT on indicate
of showed
the representing
27,937
initially
30 March
lidar the
high
ratio LiDAR
2012
transport
correlation
and the
(20:10
esti- classifi-
1,730,721
of to 209
Holben,
the
changes in-situ B.N., theetaerosol
inradiosonde al., AERONET—A
sub-types and
retrieved near federated
that usingcoterminous
the ver.instrument
wavelet 3 and covariance conditions
Sarangi,
0.74 s,T.,
transform (e.Naja,
vertical g. clouds),
(WCT) M.,
and Ojha,
spatial
methodsolar N., radiation,
Kumar,
resolution:
for CALIPSO R.,geographical
30 Lal,
mcould (upS., to Venkatara-
be 8.2 loca-
the km) (5)
sources
cation
Overall
23:40 h LT)by
using
agreement rapid
ver.
from urbanization,
4.10.
Manorabetween peak; ver. industrialization,
3.xx
Unit: and
arbitrary ver. deforestation,
4.10
(a.u.); = 68.62%.
Vertical and ground-based
range-corrected
temporal
smoke plumes remote
resolutionsfromsignal sensing
Punjab (RCS)
are 15 and m aerosol
is albedo.
processed
and
northern networks
120thereby s, for AOD
respectively,
Haryana established
overcomputa- (b)
the by
the cor-
C6.0)
the hard and workactive and fire location
support of product
the editorial (C6.0) and available
production under at- (R
mations~ 0.92) and
ofKumar,
the low
single A.,RootMSEscattering (~ 0.087), Atmos. reflecting low-
plex
network
CALIPSO
ver.
emissions
Himalayan
4.10
.+ItNIGHT
anddata.
providesfrom data
level-1B In
terrain,
archive
the data
forest-fires,
the case
level-2
(<for 100
of
VFM
aerosol
km
aerosol best
transportation
variability/standard
profiles
characterization.
overpasschoice
sub-type etc.
deviations
available
distance;
as the compared
(Valdiya, overall
of the
within
Remote
ver.2008;
data to the tions,
mani, and
threshold
National
instrument
S.,333 m)
method,
Aeronautics
calibration,
Sagar,
and
and
R.,
coincidence
complements
Space
Chandola,
Administration well circle,withRes.
H.C., collocation
2014.
the spe-
(NASA)
101 First (1–2),
and to
cri-
si-
DAY
responding
mosphere
Fig. 10. and
CALIPSO LiDAR
± 0.5° land derived
disciplines
(ver. 4.10) average Feature aerosol
respectively
profile of theType, are
(a) ver
extinction
used.
vertical 4.10 profile,
distribution (c) tion
est
and of with
CALIPSO
site, with
532-nm
variability, athe fixed
(ver.
total LR,
3.02
near-westerly
whereas, which
attenuated and MODIS then
ver.4.10)
and undergoes
backscatter
Terra measured
north-westerly C6.0 (β several
DB aerosol
winds. ′(r))
demonstrated Total
iterations
Theextension
from
teams
the grid
Sens.
4.10).
agreement
Tiwari from
atofRSE
Environ.
To
and ascertain
the between
Joshi,
as
regression
well.
66ranging (1),
2016). the
Authors
1–16.
cloud-free two
from
line.
arecific thankful
28.86°–29.86°
https://doi.org/10.1016/
cases,
versions
Lower thethe
humidity
is
to N
parameters
found
value
IIT(ISM)
and (signal
gradient
68.62%,
of RootMSE, method
for a to- usedthe
46–53.
in- multaneous
teria
2.6.
PHOtométrie
etc.
with final the BL height
radiosonde
pour
et=al.,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.01.010.
Reanalysis (Redemann
measurementsproducts
le Traitement
max <ozone,
2012).
of
observation. Wf (b)>, CO,Caseforand zbstudies
total, <NOy
532b < at zont. a This ap-
Fig.
profile
The
level-1B,8. (average
latestTypical
andlevel-2 (b) radiosonde
of the
MODIS
the valid
corresponding profiles
profiles
aerosol (16
with
product
aerosolJuneCAD 2011,
score
collections
sub-type ~<11:30 − were
C5.1
plots 35 and h)
available
using produce
ofsmoke(a)
thelevel-2
proach highest Tropospheric
potential
within an
plumes
of VFM ~adjusted
temperature,
selecting 100 km
basically
product
percentage and LR ver.ofat
horizontal a point
(b)
consisting
4.10
MODIS
averaging specific
for ofNo
where
distance;
10
AOD
multiplefine signal/totally
humidity
November the
valuesprofile
mode difference
wavelet withvertical
particles
2011
falling BL at
within
dilation be-
height
resolution
arethe
Dhanbad
78.96°–79.96°
S0034-4257(98)00031-5.
tensity
tal ofbetter
Considering 437 at the for
day
supporting
E
surface,
the and for the
night-time
aforementioned
research
period
depolarization VFM Augustwork
Invalid
the of
ratio,
continental
profiles.
facts, an
Mr.
2006–April color
Clear
The
attempt
Ashishratio
level 2017
air
transport
is
Kumar
and
of
made dis-verti-
Cloud
of
to smoke Baars,
4.2.
high-altitude H.,
Utilization
The reanalysis
plumes emanatingAnsmann,
regional
of the
productsSurface A.,
satelliteEngelmann,
representative
are produced
from products:
crop-residue R.,
site Althausen,
Estimation
in
fromburning the central
the available inof D.,LRHi- at-val-
2008.
and
marked
is 604.overm)Scatter
byoflandwill
30
circle; be
March the agreement between the regression and aerosol attenuated
Fig.
C6.0
20:38:35–20:46:01
(2016DR1014)
analyzed. The in BL
plot
and withheight
2012
ocean
UTC
Department in one-one
(~estimated
are
(i.e. 13:35
basedline hcomparison
02:08:35–02:16:01
of LT),
on
Environmental from two andCALIPSO (d)
algorithms, the
for
LTAERONET
hproducts
Science (ver.
corresponding
of 11
and 4.10
November
rangeues
level-1B)
lifted
tween
AOD
Table
defined
BL
malayas.
aerosol
up
will
Continuous
height
LiDAR
and and
1Technical
2011).
EE
reduce using
(a)
J.of (± sub-type
with
derived
0.05
monitoring
Geophys. the(c)
CALIPSO the threshold,
specifications
bias plot
± prevailing
AOD
0.15τ)
ofin
Res. ver.the
the using and
(τboundary
4.10, oflevel-2
winds
final (d)
) the
and
(b)
boundary-layer
LiDAR
Atmos. BL
119,
WCT
Mie
(%EE
heightVFM
subsequently
the
ver. methods
3AOD
LiDAR
1592–1611. ~ product
column retrieved
77.01).
estimation.
top inwith
systems that
gets
AOD ver.
How-
lidar.
https://
were
4.10
trans-At- ap-
from
ameasure-
An op- for
Hunt,
cal
agreement
evaluate the
W.H.,
features) the
data. ~results
isWinker,
from
latest 9.5% D.M.,
CALIPSO higher
versions the form
Vaughan,
level-1B
in
of of confusion
M.A.,
and
post-monsoon,
night-time
satellite 2Powell,
data
profiles
aerosol matrix asK.A.,
and
products are
long
compared pre-
are
mainly mospheric
transport observations
aerosols and and dustdynamic over themodels.region There summer are
Feature
plied
30
ments.
namelyMarch on (e)
the 2012.the
deep totalblue aerosol
(DB) and backscatter
dark target coefficient
(DT) (Remer profile et (an
al., average
ported
AERONET
erated
ever,
example to
at
MODIS of the
the (τ profiles
surrounding
site. ) lying
or MODIS within
regions (τ100
and km
towards
) coincidence
measurements high circle
altitude is of
lo- the
Engineering.
sented
Lucker,
examined
to
AOD, thatatof and
P.L., for Thanks
discussed
Weimer,
the scale
Invalid
day-time
regional period are inand
C.,
(Supplementary
due
relevance
June2009. to Director
CALIPSO
2011–March
Nilare
compared/validatedtoalso
data theTableARIES
changes
Lidar
2012.
Nil S3
discussed for inhis
description
withAfter
and the
using
the
encour-
fea-
discard-
S4). Nil mos.
4.2.1.
number
the collocated Chem.
Nilofdemonstrating
doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020631.
Estimation Terraof8,
Phys.
AERONET
reanalysis
measurements C6.0
LR the
7281–7296.
products
Nil DT
using
from isAERONET
showing
sensitivity
available
ground-based good
Nilanalysis
https://doi.org/10.5194/
MODIS onand the correlation
and
MODIS
global
AERONET the 0scale (R
selec-
(iv)
Type,
closest ver.
Percentage
CALIPSO 3et help mean
overpass) relative of deviation
16 June (MRD)
2011 (~ =
13:15 h LT);al-(f) cations BL
minimal.heights in the
Similarobtained
Himalayas,
approach from radiosonde
which
is adopted are (PT
confirmed
here and
to findSH-gradient
with out LiDARthe ob-
best meth-
2005;
agement
ture Levy
types andand al., 2013;
in this Bilal
work. et al., 2016). DT has separate Parameters
~
tion0.90),
of
acp-8-7281-2008.
26withSavtchenko,
The LR but
appropriate
as computed LiDAR-I
the least
A., Ouzounov, %EE
dilation
forreanalysis
the (~
range
three LiDAR-II
45.98)
D., LiDAR for
Ahmad, aamong
typical
systems
S., all.LiDAR-III
CALIPSO
Acker, operated J., Lep-at
and
ing
From
ground performance
the cloud
Table
truth 4,as itaerosol seensub-types
isassessment.
contaminated
previously that done J.by
profiles,
in ver. between
Atmos.
and 3,a LiDAR,
the total
the ver.
Ocean.
of 10
sub-types
researchers in3conjunction
and
Technol.
day-time ver. 4.10
identified
(e.g. such
MODIS, NCEP-NCAR
CALIPSO, reanalysis (NNR),
data and ERA-40,
trajectory ERA-Interim,
model-
ods)
gorithms and for CALIPSOClear
land andair(threshold
ocean, andNil WCT DBmethods) 97.44% thefor there- 0.40%
10 studied servations
LR values 1.84%
days. and
for the satellite
three 0.30%
measurements
LiDAR systems 0.02% over
operated the site
in 23,414,038
under
night-time
Appendix
data.
(7), Further,
1214–1228.
cloud-free A.
CALIPSO the whereas
to https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1223.1.
evaluate profiles, AOD
in theing.values
temporal
is
from for two
match versions
land
(< 2 h) with of Wavelength532
Based
level-1B
Badarinath,
Manora
toukh,
Modern-Era on
G., peak the
(ver.
Koziana, %EE
4.10)
K.V.S.,
during nm
Retrospective values,
total
Kiran
J.,2008–2012,aerosol
Nickless, a 532
Chand, total
analysis nm
D.,
by offor
backscatter
T.R., 127,
2004.
using Prasad,80
Researchthe
Terra 532
and
coefficients
AOD V.K.,
and nm
134
and data
2006.
values
Aqua
Applica-profile
re-