Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Most important
however is to move beyond the past. Not that Bill Gates has not emphasized this
side, but it has to be emphasised more. When you hit refresh, you look for
something new. It is about new knowledge, new initiatives, new opportunities
and new vision. That is how you can achieve a mission, if it is to change the world.
How to Achieve a Mission?
Nadella had joined the Microsoft in 1992. He believed that it had a mission to
change the world through technology. However after some 20 years or so, the
company was in the midst of some (internal) trouble and Nadella relates an
interesting story which is more or equally appropriate to politics and politicians.
A cartoonist had drawn the Microsoft organization chart as a warring gang, each
executive pointing a gun at another. This had bothered Nadella immensely as he
says. Most unacceptable was the others’ acceptance of this ‘gun fight’ as normal.
Therefore, since he was appointed as the CEO of Microsoft in 2014, his mission
had been to change this internal culture. How has he achieved that? First he says,
“I told employees that renewing our company’s culture would be my highest
priority.” He has been quite open.
Let me briefly relate my own experience at the Colombo Stock Exchange (CSE). I
don’t have any other private sector experience, apart from at universities
(Peradeniya, Colombo and Vidyodaya), much worse in terms of this ‘gun culture.’
When I joined the CSE in 2009 as an academic nominee to the Directorate, I had
much hope that the CSE could contribute to the country’s economic growth. It
actually did during those post-war two years and the Board of Directors also
worked quite constructively and harmoniously. However, the problem was with
the stock brokers or their associations who were not only at loggerheads at each
other, but sometimes against the Secretariat or the Board of Directors. It was not
competitiveness, but ‘gun culture.’ Political manipulations or affiliations were part
of the problem, subsequently led to several insider trading and dubious deals.
How Nadella had resolved this type of an internal culture is important to reveal.
“Not long time into my tenure as CEO, I decided to experiment with one of the
most important meetings I lead. Each week my senior leadership team (SLT) meets
to review, brainstorm, and wrestle with big opportunities and difficult decisions….I
felt that we need to deepen our understanding of one another – to delve into what
really makes each of us tick – and to connect our personal philosophies to our jobs
as leaders of the company. I knew that If we dropped those proverbial guns and
channel that collective IQ and energy into a refreshed mission, we could get back
to the dream that first inspired Bill [Gates] and Paul [Allen] – democratizing
leading-edge computer technology.”
Hmm! Democratizing computer technology! It is little bit odd for a political
science person like me to draw a lesson on ‘democratization’ from a computer
man like Satya Nadella. Nevertheless, the lesson is simple and clear. Drop the
Guns!
Whether in the case of the Cabinet, Parliament, the so-called National Unity
Government, the Opposition, the Political Parties, the Left, the Religious
Organizations or the country at large, the lesson is loud and clear. It may be that it
is easier said than done. But one has to read through the whole book of Nadella,
at least to get some inspiration.
Technology and Empathy
Empathy is a word that Nadella has used numerous times in his book. I don’t have
an e-copy to count the number. Where has he got it? Can’t it be from Microsoft
alone, although there is a hint to that effect in the book. Then it must have come
from Gates and Allen who had founded the Microsoft. When, Nadella first went
for the interview in 1992, this is what had happened.
“Imagine you see a baby laying in the street, and the baby is crying. What do you
do,” the interviewer had asked.
“You call 911.” He had said.
Richard Tait, who interviewed him had walked him out of the office and had said
“You need some empathy man. If a baby is laying on a street crying, pick up the
baby.” But Nadella had also got the job!
It is possible that Nadella’s big empathy revealed in the book also come from his
father and mostly mother and his background in India. Although I branded his
father a Marxist at the beginning of this review, he was not exactly a strong
Marxist, but an officer in the Indian Administrative Service with some orientation
towards or liking for Marxism. But mother was different, who was a Sanskrit
scholar and a fan of goddess Lakshmi. He was also influenced by his wife, Anu,
and together they were bringing up a child with special needs. All blended into his
character and vision it seems.
There are numerous stories and information that he relates, particularly in
Chapter 3 on “New Mission and Momentum,” how technology has and could
address the issues of poverty, malnutrition, lack of education, health care or even
class or other social oppression in Asia, Africa, Latin America and Eastern Europe.
This is about and based on empathy.
As I understand, there are numerous Microsoft initiated or assisted training
programs in Sri Lanka some with the government sector (e.g. Ministry of Skills
Training) bringing technology to the job seekers and young entrepreneurs.
Therefore, this book can be of immense use at least for the ‘trainers’ or designers
of these training portals to understand the ultimate purpose of such skill training.
Universal Basic Income?
Let me turn to his primary vision as I see it. Technology and its benefits cannot
spread without globalization, at least to its necessary extent. At present, there is a
reversal of globalization particularly in the West and also in other regions. Why?
One reason is that the spread of technology or ‘globalization’ has benefitted
mostly ‘the other.’ Nadella believes, with some others, that it would re-emerge
with a leap in new technology and more equitably. Perhaps, India and China and
others in Asia might take the lead. ‘The goal is to grow the pie for everyone,’ he
says.
His vision is not about neoliberalism. He has a different vision. Of course he
speaks mostly from Microsoft experience and on behalf of Microsoft. However,
his vision is something beyond, and may be applicable to other companies and
everyone. He says, “Real business success, in fact capitalism generally, cannot be
just the surplus that you create for your own core constituency, but also the
broader surplus that is created to benefit the wider society.” He appears to be a
capitalist reformist.
It is normally believed or feared that with the adoption of high-tech,
unemployment and displacement would emerge particularly in traditional
manufacturing and agricultural sectors. This is absolutely true. But he has a
solution to the problem, of course within a new social contract that he talks
about. “In the face of these many coming shifts, there must be a new social
contract that helps to achieve economic surplus and opportunity on a more
equitable basis,” he emphasises.
For such a new social contract, partnerships between the public, the private and
also the non-profit making social service sectors should be built. The latter is rare
in Sri Lanka, but plenty in Australia. In his scheme of technology training, it is not
only the high-end knowledge workers who should be trained, but also the low-
skill and mid-skill labour. He also believes that ‘the service sector’ and ‘people-on-
people jobs’ should be available for those who might drop out from high tech or
mid tech sectors.
His overall proposition is to have a Universal Basic Income (UBI) for all, as the
bottom line, beyond borders and beyond sectors. This appears to be a new
universal human right that he advocates of course with some others.
Posted by Thavam