Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Bing Lu
Professor McClure
Writing 39B
03/13/2018
Final Reflection
The Writing 39B course I take in this quarter is based on the horror genre literature.
Before I take this course, I had a very vague comprehension about horror genre. I used to think
that only the scary movies and books with ghost and supernatural elements are considered horror
genre. After this quarter, I learn a lot more about identifying and writing horror related texts.
the following content, I will be discussing some of the course objectives and my learning process
After this quarter, the most thing I learn about and I want to talk about most is my ability
of rhetorically analyzing and critical reading. Prior to class, I was very weak at reading and
analyzing texts, and I have never learnt a specific genre of literature earlier in my English
learning. The assignment that I devoted most time in this class is the rhetorical analysis. I have
written three drafts in total and each of them is modified with big differences. When I wrote my
first draft of the rhetorical analysis, I stood a very general point on analyzing the rhetoric
elements in I Am Legend. I was still adapting my writing from analyzing the character’s mind to
the writer’s purpose of creating the characters. To give us a better understanding of rhetorical
analysis, Professor McClure assigned paragraphs to each group and discussed with us about how
to analyze a short passage elaborately. The professor told us to capture words and sentences that
reflects the genre and the conflicts in the story. After the discussion, I revised my first draft by
Lu 2
analyzing how the fiction sticks to horror genre. However, I still found it hard to narrow down
my analysis into how a specific scene or a setting is categorized as horror genre. When I talked
to the professor during the office hour, professor McClure pointed out that I Am Legend fits the
horror genre not because the story is scary. Instead, the protagonist, Robert Neville is a very
representative character of the monster in the horror literature and Ruth is the typical hero in this
type of stories. Before this course, what I know about rhetoric was limited to the figures of
speech, such as metaphor or irony. When I wrote first two drafts, I found it unreasonable to break
down the fiction into such short pieces and analyze them sentence to sentence, so I was stuck at
the rhetorical analysis essay for a long time. However, once I understood that analyzing
particular situations, I could connect most contents in Noel Carroll’s The Nature of Horror to the
text that I was analyzing. With a fuller comprehension of the protagonist’s impurity and
extraordinariness and Ruth’s compassion and lack of conflicts, I finally understood what should
be included in a rhetorical analysis and I think this is the most important thing I learned in this
Another big improvement on my level of writing was achieved by the variety types of
assignments I did in this quarter. The workload of this course was relatively larger than the other
courses I took, but the assignments consist many different types of writing, so it was a very
efficient way to improve the writing skill in different areas simultaneously of international
students’ like mine. At the beginning of this quarter, to be introductive to this quarter’s horror
genre theme, the professor gave us some readings on horror stories and short videos and there
were several assignments on imitation or creation of our own horror stories. These writings
helped me a lot on exploring my creativity and put the things I learned about story writing from
Lu 3
my former English learning into use. Moreover, there were some short writings about responses
to some short videos like music videos and short horror films. In my opinion, the analysis to
videos is very similar to the process of critical reading. Learning to find the evidences of what
the producers want to tell the audience helped me a lot when I tried to find the evidences to
support my claims in more formal writings. Also, what I learned mostly in Writing 39A in the
previous quarter was about the narratives and the weekly responses and the reflections
strengthened my narrative skills and it was pleasant to see that I kept a continuous process in my
English writing learning. At the end of this quarter, we tried a completely unacquainted style of
writing: writing the scripts for the short horror film we made for the RIP project. In conclusion,
the variety of styles of writings we did in this quarter efficiently improved my overall writing
Other than writing, I think this course also improved my skills on creating works by
different kinds of media. After several presentations we made in class, it became clearer to me on
what should be put on the PowerPoint to show the audience and what should be remember by us
giving the speech to make the presentations more understandable to the audience. Another big
challenge for me in this course was the editing of the short film we made for the RIP project. I
was totally unfamiliar with the editing software before this project and a lot of time was devoted
into the learning of the editing. Although this skill is not related to writing, I think it is a very
useful skill that I would use again in my further learning and career. In another hand, this
engagement to the challenges that I encountered. These group works like presentations and RIP
projects also promoted our group members’ collaboration and our sense of responsibility when
In terms of writing scholarly, the most thing I learned in this course was the evidence
writing and it could be applied to all kinds of writing. I used to only make my claims and explore
my opinions with no patterns or legitimacy. After a quarter’s learning, I know that in formal
writings, my every opinion discussed in the text should be supported by existing evidences but
not only with inference. For example, in my rhetorical analysis, I should either prove my point of
view by the solid evidence in the book that I was analyzing or by the outside sources that are
scholarly approved to convince my audience in an efficient way. I also learned that I should try
to avoid discussing things that the audience may not know without any explanation. The seven
steps of evidence writing that the professor taught us were very useful when creating the
structure of my essays and I think this technique will benefit my future writing works so I will be
Last but not the least, the writing and revising process in this course is very worth
discussing. The two big works I did this quarter were the rhetorical analysis essay and the RIP
essay, and both essays were revised for several times before the final draft. I realized that it was
less possible to write a good essay with only one draft and the improvement was made through
multiple revisions. During the revision process, I think the most effective way is the peer
reviewing especially when I was reviewing others’ essays. My classmates and I would all make
some mistakes that were similar in some ways and by finding their mistakes according to the
rubrics, I often realized my own mistakes and it would be very helpful when I revised my own
drafts after this. Combining my peer’s advices and the professor’s advices, the writing process
In conclusion, I think Writing 39B is a course that not only develops students’ writing
skills, but also improves me in reading, forms my interests in literature, increases my skills in
Lu 5
different media techniques, and most importantly develops my persistence in working. Professor
McClure influences me in many good ways and his course design that benefits me surely
exceeds what I have expected for this course and I am happy that I make a lot progress.