Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Apparatus:
o 250mL beaker
o Teat dropper
o Electronic balance
o Stirring rod
o Spatula
o Small funnel
o Filter paper
o Bunsen burner
o Clay triangle
o Tripod stand
Materials:
o A- unknown sample
o B- 6M hydrochloric acid
Procedure:
1. The mass of a clean, dry 250mL beaker was measured to the nearest 0.01g using an
electronic balance. Between 0.35g and 0.40g of the unknown sample was added to the
250mL beaker and the mass of the beaker plus the sample to the nearest 0.01g was
recorded.
2. 50mL of distilled water was added to the sample in the beaker. 20 drops of 6M HCL
was then added to the beaker. The contents of the beaker were stirred until the sample
was entirely dissolved. The stirring rod was left in the beaker.
3. 25mL of 0.15M BaCl2 solution was measured in a graduated cylinder. The graduated
cylinder was cleaned and washed with distilled water but was not dried.
4. The solution containing the sample in the 250mL beaker was heated until it was
nearly boiling. The burner was turned off and small portions of BaCl2 was slowly
poured in small portions into the 250mL beaker containing the sample. This step took
three minutes. The contents of beaker were stirred as the BaCl2 solution was added.
stirring rod was washed into the solution with small amounts of distilled water and the
5. While the precipitate settled the crucible was prepared by heating on the hottest part
of the Bunsen burner flame for about 2 minutes. After the crucible was cooled to
room temperature the mass of the crucible and cover to the nearest 0.01g was
6. A piece of filter paper was prepared by folding it into quarters. The folded paper was
opened into a cone. It was placed into a funnel and it was wet with distilled water so
that it adhered to the funnel. A 500mL conical flask was placed under the funnel to
down into the filter paper while being stirred with a stirring rod. Caution was taken so
that the level of liquid in the filter funnel was never more than three-fourths of the
way to the top of the filter paper. When the transfer was completed the wash bottle
was used to rinse the residual precipitate from the beaker and the stirring rod into the
funnel.
8. After all the liquid was drained from the funnel the top edges of the filter paper was
pressed carefully together and the filter paper was folded into a compact package that
fit into the crucible. Little force was used to avoid tearing the filter paper. The folded
9. The crucible was supported with the clay triangle on the tripod stand. The crucible
was gently heated without the cover to remove the water. After several minutes when
the paper was dried, the crucible was heated vigorously and the filter paper burst into
flames. The filter paper was smothered with the crucible cover and the amount of heat
was lessened. it was heated moderately until the paper turned black.
10. Once the filter paper turned black the crucible was heated vigorously with the cover
off in the hottest part of the Bunsen burner. The bottom of the crucible was red hot.
The charred filter paper was gradually combusted and converted into CO2 gas. When
the filter paper was entirely combusted the while BaSO4 remained in the crucible. The
crucible was heated vigorously until there was no charred remaining in the filter
paper.
11. The crucible was cooled. When the crucible cooled to room temperature the mass of
the crucible, the cover and its contents, were recorded to the nearest 0.01g on the
electronic balance.
Results:
Mass/g
Mass of clean dry beaker 122.27
Mass of unknown sample + beaker 122.64
Mass of unknown sample 0.37
Mass of crucible + cover 78.85
Mass of crucible + cover + BaSO4 79.23
Calculations:
= 0.38g
= 0.38 233
= 1.631 10-3mols
= 1.631 10-3 96
= 0.157g
= 42.432%
Discussion:
precipitate is separated from the aqueous solution via filtration. The filtrate is then weighed.
The aim of this experiment was to determine the percentage of sulphate in an unknown
sulphate salt. This was done by gravimetric analysis. In the experiment, 0.37g of the
unknown salt was dissolved in water after which an excess of barium chloride was added to.
As a result, there was a precipitation of a sulphate namely, barium sulphate which was
collected weighed and dried. The mass recorded when weighed was used to determine the
number of moles of barium sulphate precipitate (1.631 10-3mols) which was equal to the
number of moles of sulphate in the original sample of the unknown. The number of moles of
barium sulphate precipitate (was equal to the number of moles of the sulphate in original
sample of the unknown because it was assumed that the reaction went to completion since
barium chloride added was added in excess. This was used to calculate the percentage by
mass of the original sample of the unknown which was calculated to be 42.432%.
Conclusion:
sulphate, was formed which was dried and weighed. The mass of this weighed precipitate
was used to calculate the moles and the mass of sulphate in the unknown sample. The
Sources of error:
1. Failure to combust all of the filter paper to form CO2 would’ve resulted in an
inaccurate measurement.