Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Janelle De Jong
Dr. Guest
ENGL 3200
11 December 2015
Steroid and doping scandals are a commonplace in sport’s news within the past twenty
years. With the pressures to reach the highest possible peak of performance due to higher
sponsorship and salaries for the best players in any top sport, some athletes turn to taking drugs
to get them that advantage. The use of chemical enhancers to increase athletic performance is not
new, early Olympic athletes in Greece took supplements, but these naturally occurring
substances had much less of an effect and were safer than modern performance-enhancing drugs.
Current athletes who use these illegal drugs take them in secret, without regulation, and it is
usually not until after they out-perform their competitors or drug tests results come in that they
get caught and punished for their choices. Lance Armstrong, a famous cyclist who won seven
Tour de France races, was banned from competing for life, stripped of his titles, and lost
commercial sponsors due to the fact that it was proven that he used illegal performance-
enhancers. Although it is proven that these drugs, to a degree, do work: they can make a person
stronger, and have more stamina, performance-enhancing drugs should not be used in sports. The
short term benefits to athletic performance do not outweigh the possible health risks. Using a
drug to reach levels of athletic performance previously impossible is unethical and morally
against the spirit of sports. The use of these performance-enhancing drugs is also banned in most
sports, so those who choose to use anyway are thus wrong in breaking the law.
De Jong 2
alter or increase the production of hormones in the human body which either increase
performance or quicken recovery time. The most common example of these are anabolic
androgenic steroids. Anabolic steroids as they are commonly called are synthetic versions of
hormones that have been used since the 1930s as a way to increase muscle mass. They do this
by increasing the levels of male sex hormones such as testosterone in the body, which in turn
grow muscles. These drugs work for both male and females who take them. The drugs can be
taken by either injecting them or orally ingesting them. “Some of the most abused steroids
include Deca-Durabolin, Equipoise, and Winstrol” (Anabolic Steroids). The increased muscle
functioning is appealing to athletes because it means that they will be able to hit and throw a ball
farther, block the opponents for longer, and other situations in sports can be advanced if a person
were to be stronger.
Increases in performance can also be done through techniques that increase the amount of
red blood cells in an athlete’s blood. Red blood cells increase the oxygen available to muscles
and having more of them “improves athletic performance in endurance events” (Wilson).
Erythropoietin or EPO, is a hormone that causes the kidneys to produce more red blood cells. It
originally was produced commercially for dialysis and cancer patients with anemia in the 1980s,
but was soon used by athletes to increase their endurance (Hamilton, 32). All methods that
increase the amount of red blood cells in the body are banned in all sports federations. No athlete
should use performance-enhancing drugs, whether they are young or adults, amateur or
professional because of the health risks, moral wrongness, and legality issues of them.
Performance-enhancing drugs have a negative effect on the user’s body. There are both
long term and short term effects of the drugs. Some short-term effects are that users can have
De Jong 3
severe acne, muscle cramps, headaches, and high blood pressure among others (Jendrick, 4).
Long-term effects are liver damage, increased blood clotting factors, and less good cholesterol in
the blood. Without this type of cholesterol, the chance of getting cardiovascular disease
increases. “The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) lists the following major side effects
resulting from the abuse of anabolic steroids: liver and kidney tumors, jaundice, and fluid
retention” (Mehlman, 52). Women can experience masculinizing effects such as deepening of the
voice, body and facial hair growth, enlarged clitoris. Along with physical effects of performance-
enhancing drugs there are also psychological health problems that result do to their use. Possible
issues include mood swings, aggression and rage, irritability, depression, and insomnia (Anabolic
Steroids).
Some people argue that it is the athlete’s choice, knowing the possible consequences,
whether or not they still want to use performance-enhancers. Braden Allenby, a professor of
engineering and ethics at Arizona State University wrote an article in The Washington Post titled
“After Armstrong’s Fall, the Case for Performance Enhancement”, where he proposes: “If we
allow football players to take violent hits and suffer concussions so that we might be entertained,
why not allow them to use substances that might cause them health problems? It’s their decision”
(Allenby, 443). This argument is not valid because the athletes should not be allowed to make
this decision because they are not experts in the drugs. The drugs are banned for a reason and the
player should not have the authority to override scientists and health professionals. The analogy
of concussions and hard hits in football to performance-enhancing drugs is false because some
injuries are normal aspects of sports; they occur due to the nature of the game. These injuries are
also more curable such as resting and icing a sprained ankle, or sitting out a few games to get
over a concussion. Damage to the body due to performance-enhancing drugs can be chronic and
De Jong 4
hard to reverse. Dangers of performance-enhancing drugs to athletes are not necessary risks to
Others may argue that with advancements in training, diets, and supplements causing
athletes to perform at levels higher than before in history, why not add performance-enhancers to
this list of legal enhancements. This argument does not take into account the differences between
the examples given. Performance-enhancing drugs cause greater health side-effects and are taken
in higher doses than legal supplements. Allenby states “Why not add drugs and other
technologies to the list of legal enhancements especially when most of us are enhancing our
workplace concentration with a morning coffee or energy shot?” (Allenby, 442). His comparison
between caffeine in the workplace and drugs in sports does not connect. Caffeine concentrations
and effects on the body are less than injecting or ingesting synthetic performance-enhancing
secret can increase the risks of HIV/AIDS and hepatitis from needle-sharing (Mehlman, 52). At
their worst performance-enhancing drugs can even lead to death in their users. EPO, which
increases the red blood cell counts is “behind the deaths of a dozen Dutch and Belgian cyclists in
the late eighties and early nineties: their hearts stopped when they could not pump the EPO-
thickened blood. Stories from that era tell of riders who set alarm clocks for the middle of the
night, so they could wake up and do some pulse-increasing calisthenics” (Hamilton, 32). This is
to say that the same thing that causes some benefits in performance can cause serious health risks
and even death when the blood clots and prevents a heart from pumping properly.
The use of drugs in an attempt to make a human body perform above its natural
capability is unethical and unfair. For those who are not taking artificial performance-enhancers
De Jong 5
it is hard to even impossible to reach the level that users are reaching in their respective sports.
This causes more people to turn to using or to settle for being second best. Doping goes against
the most basic principles of fair play, a person who does not use performance enhancers “might
suffer from financial, social, and probably occupational disadvantages in addition to personal
disappointment, if he/she loses a competition against an athlete who artificially increased his/her
performance” (Thevis, 3). This principle also goes to show that people who set records and
participated in sporting events before the mass use of anabolic steroids and hormone injections
have gotten their records passed and achievements belittled by those who use synthetic hormones
Sports should be what a human body can do from training and practice. Sport is not about
simply winning. “The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization
(UNESCO) division on anti-doping believes that ‘doping jeopardizes the moral and ethical basis
of sport and the health of those involved in it’” (Thevis, 3). In the Olympics many athletes from
different countries participate against one another and it would be unfair if countries with more
money, more research into performance-enhancers, and more access to drugs, had athletes who
were above the competition. “The Olympic Movement identifies the Olympic spirit-mutual
understanding, spirit of friendship, solidarity, and fair play- as fundamental to sport” (Thevis, 3).
Performance-enhancing drugs should not be used because they give users an unfair edge above
their opponents, if no one were to use them the “playing field” would be leveled.
Sports should be about competition with respect to each individual participating and with
regard to the rules of the game. Some may argue that the use of performance-enhancing drugs is
not cheating, that if everyone has access to them it is not unfair. “Are they really cheating?
Steroids are an advance in science, like moving from the horse carriage to the automobile”
De Jong 6
(Jendrick, 10). It is true that the steroids as they are synthetic versions of naturally occurring
hormones are advancements of science. The fact that they are advancements of science does not
lead to the idea that they are good or correct for use in sports. Also the analogy of a transition
from horse carriages to cars does not have the same effect as not doing drugs to taking
performance-enhancing drugs because the former did not have an effect on human health. It is
also stated that Athletes have been enhancing forever, or more precisely since Greek Olympic
times (Jendrick, 5). First-of-all the enhancement used in the past was not as effective and as
damaging as hormone injections during current times. Secondly, just because athletes have
“always” been doing it does not make it right, or say that what they were doing did not constitute
as cheating.
If one chooses to ignore the safety and moral reasons why they should not use
performance-enhancers they still are wrong to use them due to the fact that they are illegal.
Those who take them while knowing that they are banned by the governing body of their sport
are lying cheaters who deserve to be suspended from the sport. They have been banned in sport
to protect the players from the possible serious health risks of subjecting the body to added
hormones, and to keep the playing field fair for everyone. The first official group to make a ban
on performance-enhancing drugs was the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in 1988. The
charter read “The use of drugs and other substances and banned methods to enhance or
accentuate athletic performance is a tragic reality that must be eliminated from modern sport”
(Thevis, 2). The Anabolic Steroids Control Act of 1990 labeled anabolic steroids as controlled
substances. The possession or sale of anabolic steroids without a valid prescription is illegal. The
penalties for possession of anabolic steroids are $1000 fee for first offense and anywhere from
Some may argue that drug testing of athletes is expensive and invasive of their privacy.
The reality is large sport organizations such as Major League Baseball, and National Basketball
Association have enough money from revenue to perform random urine tests on players and have
those sent to a lab for analysis. The statement that the drugs tests are invasive to privacy is also
weak because when a player joins the respective league or sporting group they are playing in
they agree to the terms, rules, and regulations as they are. The drug tests are noninvasive, all that
is no room for the argument that those who choose to use them should have any protection or
sympathy. They are cheating and risking their health by taking banned controlled substances.
“The use of biomedical enhancements is no different than the practice of corking bats in
baseballs or coming in first in a marathon race by slipping onto the course near the end”
(Mehlman, 51). Users are using illegal outside helping agents to better their chances at winning
The sad truth that performance-enhancing drugs do work in the short term causes their
use to continue, but the health risks, the reality that those who take them are cheating, and the
fact that they are illegal should make it clear that people should not use performance-enhancing
drugs such as anabolic steroids. Steroid use has been proven to be the cause of multiple deaths of
athletes, along with causing some unnecessary health problems such as liver disease. These risks
are not inherently necessary for participation in sport and therefore support that performance-
enhancing drugs should not be used in sport. The drugs cause people to perform above their
peers because they can increase muscle mass. This is unfair because they are unnatural and the
performance of people who use undermines those who do not. Sport should be about what the
De Jong 8
human body is capable of achieving from hard work and practice and not how much drugs a
person can pump into their system. Athletes should instead focus on perfectly their sport through
practice, proper diet, and rest. If all people knew how unethical performance-enhancing drugs
were, that there are established laws against them, and the supported health risks of them no
Works Cited
Allenby, Braden. “After Armstrong’s Fall, the Case for Performance Enhancement”
‘Washington Post’, October 28, 2013. Rpt. In ‘Read, Reason, Write: An Argument Text
and Reader.’ Ed. Dorothy U. Seyler. NY, NY: McGraw-Hill Education, 2015. 440-443.
Print.
Anabolic Steroids, a Dangerous and Illegal Way to Seek Athletic Dominance and Better
Hamilton, Tyler, and Daniel Coyle. The Secret Race: Inside the Hidden World of the Tour De
France : Doping, Cover-ups, and Winning at All Costs. New York: Bantam, 2012. Print.
Jendrick, Nathan. Dunks, Doubles, Doping: How Steroids Are Killing American Athletics.
Mehlman, Maxwell J. The Price of Perfection: Individualism and Society in the Era of
Substances and Doping Control Analytical Assays. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley, 2010. Internet
resource.