Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
OF THE TAXPAYER
BEFORE PAYMENT
1. administrative protest
2. request for reconsideration
3. request for reinvestigation
4. judicial protest
AFTER PAYMENT
1. claim for tax refund
2. claim for tax credit
WHERE: BIR
HOW: written protest, stating facts, applicable law, rules and regulations or jurisprudence o which
his protest is based; if only portions of FAN are disputed, must pay the deficiency tax on undisputed
portion
PROCEDURE:
1. finding for any deficiency tax is the result of mathematical error in computation of tax as appearing on
face of return
2. a discrepancy has been determined between the tax withheld and the amount actually remitted
3. taxpayer who opted to claim a refund or credit of excess creditable withholding tax for at taxable period
was determined to have carried over and automatically applied the same amount claimed against the
estimated tax liabilities for the taxable quarter/s for the succeeding taxable year/s
4. excise tax due on excisable articles have not been paid
5. article locally purchased or imported by an exempt person
- in either case, the request must be accompanied by a WAIVER of the statute of limitations in favor
of the government
4. Judicial Protest
PROCEDURE
1. within 30 days from denial of protest by CIR or from lapse of 180-day period, appeal to CTA division
2. if CTA division denies, motion for reconsideration within 15 days from receipt
3. within 15 days from denial of motion, appeal to CTA en banc
4. appeal to SC within 15 days by petition for review (Rule 45)
5. Refund/Credit
- based on the legal principle of quasi-contract or solutio indebiti
- in the nature of an exemption, which cannot be allowed unless granted in the most explicit and
categorical language
- strictly construed against the claimant (proof of claim must be established)
- partial payment of a tax cannot be the basis for a tax refund
- interest on taxes refunded may not be paid by the Government to the taxpayer, UNLESS: (a) the
CIR acted with patent arbitrariness (inexcusable or obstinate disregard for legal provision); and (b) in
the case of income taxes withheld on the wages of employees, which must be refunded within 3
mos from April 15
1. there was an actual collection and receipt by the Government of the tax sought to be recovered (factual
proof)
2. legal basis for the granting of refund or credit, including verification of compliance with the statutory
requirements relative to the filing of claims within the reglementary 2-yr period
3. in case of corporations, must signify whether to avail of tax refund or tax credit in the corporate income
tax return
Q: Are income tax returns actionable documents which must be specifically denied by the
Government, otherwise it would constitute an admission to the allegation that payment has in
fact already been made and therefore the taxpayer no longer has to submit proof of claim of
refund?
A: Income tax returns are not actionable documents because the action is not based on the income
tax returns but on the entitlement of the taxpayer to tax refund. Therefore, his claim for refund must
be supported by proof.
NOTA BENE: If proof of claim for refund is established, the BIR should refund without any unreasonable delay
1. written claim for refund or tax credit must be filed by the taxpayer with the CIR
2. the claim must be a categorical demand for reimbursement
3. both administrative and judicial claims for refund/credit must be filed within 2 years from date of
payment regardless of any supervening cause (in case of corporations, the 2-year period is counted from
the date final adjusted return was filed at end of taxable year)
Q: Suppose A filed his claim for tax refund with the BIR within the 2-yr reglementary period but
it is only after two years have lapsed before BIR rendered a decision and it is one of denial. A
now files an appeal of the BIR’s decision with the CTA within the 30-day period to appeal. Will
A’s action prosper?
A: No, A’s action will not prosper. Although A filed his claim for refund with the BIR within the 2-yr
prescriptive period, he failed to file the same within the same period with the CTA. The rule is that the
taxpayer need wait for the action of CIR on his claim for refund before he can take his claim to the
CTA. The 2-yr period must be complied with in both the BIR and CTA, regardless of any supervening
cause.
PRINCIPLE OF EQUITABLE RECOUPMENT – allows a taxpayer whose claim for a refund has been
barred due to prescription (lapse of more than 2yrs counted from date of payment) to recover said
tax by setting off the prescribed refund against a tax that may be due and collectible from him; NOT
ALLOWED in the Philippines because it puts a premium on the taxpayer’s neglect to enforce or
assert his rights under the law