COMMISSION; VLAD I MIR P. DEVENS, in his individual and official capaci t y; KYLE CHOCK, in his individual and official capaci ty; THOMAS CONTRADES, in his individual and official capacity; LISA M. JUDGE, in her individual and official capacity; NORMAND R. LEZY, in his individual and official capacity; NICHOLAS W. TEVES, JR., in his individual and official capacity; RONALD I. HELLER, in his individual and official capacity; DUANE KANUHA, in his official capacity; CHARLES JENCKS, in his official capacity; JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-1 0 ; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1 -10; DOE ENTITIES 2-10; and DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-10,
Defendants. Case 1:11-cv-00414-SOM-KJM Document 373 Filed 03/23/18 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 7468
VERDICT FORM
Please ans wer both questions below . Each answer
must be unanimous.
We, the jury, answer the questions submitted to us
as fol l ows:
1. Has Bridge Aina Le'a proved by a preponderance
of the evidence that a taking occurred under Taki ng Analysis No. l?
Answer: YES x NO_ __
Proceed to Question 2.
2. Has Bridge Aina Le'a proved by a preponderance
of the evidence that a taking occurred under Taking Analysis No. 2?
Answer: YES "}.__ NO
The foreperson should sign and date the back of this
2010-01-02 Zernik V Connor (2:08-cv-01550) - Served by US District Court, Central District of California - Minutes, Orders, Judgment As Served On Plaintiff During The Purported Litigation