Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-
srm:195450 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald
for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission
guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company
manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as
well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and
services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for
digital archive preservation.
Downloaded by Middle East Technical University At 02:39 01 February 2016 (PT)
download.
*Related content and download information correct at time of
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
www.emeraldinsight.com/0952-6862.htm
IJHCQA
28,7
Factors affecting dental
service quality
Mohammadkarim Bahadori
678 Health Management Research Center,
Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Received 10 December 2014 Mehdi Raadabadi
Revised 1 February 2015 Health Services Management Research Center,
12 April 2015
Accepted 10 May 2015 Institute for Futures Studies in Health,
Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
Downloaded by Middle East Technical University At 02:39 01 February 2016 (PT)
Ramin Ravangard
Department of Health Services Management,
School of Management and Medical Information Sciences,
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran, and
Donia Baldacchino
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences,
University of Malta, Malta
Abstract
Purpose – Measuring dental clinic service quality is the first and most important factor in improving
care. The quality provided plays an important role in patient satisfaction. The purpose of this paper is
to identify factors affecting dental service quality from the patients’ viewpoint.
Design/methodology/approach – This cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical study was conducted in
a dental clinic in Tehran between January and June 2014. A sample of 385 patients was selected from two
work shifts using stratified sampling proportional to size and simple random sampling methods. The
data were collected, a self-administered questionnaire designed for the purpose of the study, based on the
Parasuraman and Zeithaml’s model of service quality which consisted of two parts: the patients’
demographic characteristics and a 30-item questionnaire to measure the five dimensions of the service
quality. The collected data were analysed using SPSS 21.0 and Amos 18.0 through some descriptive
statistics such as mean, standard deviation, as well as analytical methods, including confirmatory factor.
Findings – Results showed that the correlation coefficients for all dimensions were higher than 0.5.
In this model, assurance (regression weight ¼ 0.99) and tangibility (regression weight ¼ 0.86) had,
respectively, the highest and lowest effects on dental service quality.
Practical implications – The Parasuraman and Zeithaml’s model is suitable to measure quality in
dental services. The variables related to dental services quality have been made according to the model.
Originality/value – This is a pioneering study that uses Parasuraman and Zeithaml’s model and CFA
in a dental setting. This study provides useful insights and guidance for dental service quality assurance.
Keywords Iran, Quality measures, Service quality, Measurement, Confirmatory factor analysis,
Quality improvement, Quality assessment, Dental
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
In today’s competitive world, quality has become increasingly important in all
International Journal of Health
Care Quality Assurance organizations and is considered an important, strategic lever (Brennan et al., 1991; Groene
Vol. 28 No. 7, 2015
pp. 678-689
et al., 2008), which plays a key role in gaining competitive advantages and achieving
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
0952-6862
success (DeMoranville and Bienstock, 2003; Kong and Jogaratnam, 2007). Quality is
DOI 10.1108/IJHCQA-12-2014-0112 considered more in industries than in service sectors, whose main characteristics are
production and consumption intangibility and inseparability (Murphy, 2007) while the Dental service
current service sectors can have a significant contribution to the economic growth and quality
quality of life (Büyüközkan et al., 2011). Measuring healthcare service quality is the first
and most important step to improving care (Davis et al., 2005; Lee and Yom, 2007) and the
quality provided plays an important role in patient satisfaction ( John et al., 2011).
Additionally, healthcare’s increasing complexity and the rising demand for improved
patient safety, monitoring health service quality has become essential (Manias, 2010). 679
The demand for quality is also increasing among health system stakeholders, such as
medical insurance organizations, healthcare providers and health policy makers (Beyer
et al., 2011; Davies, 2001; Rosenbaum, 2003). Consequently, providing high-quality
services in the health sector is considered a desirable goal that leads to development in
other areas (Andaleeb, 2000b; Karydis et al., 2001; Youssef, 1996).
Downloaded by Middle East Technical University At 02:39 01 February 2016 (PT)
Method
Study design
680 The study population included all patients receiving dental services. This cross-sectional
and analytical study was conducted between January and June 2014. Inclusion criteria
were patients receiving clinic services at least once, who were familiar with its employees,
environment and dental clinic. A sample of 385 patients was determined (maximum CFA
size). This sample was selected from morning and evening work shifts across 15 working
days in May using the stratified sampling proportional to the size method. Therefore,
Downloaded by Middle East Technical University At 02:39 01 February 2016 (PT)
each work shift was considered as a stratum in which patients were selected considering
the total patients in each shift using a random numbers table.
Data collection
Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire, designed for the study,
based on Parasuraman and Zeithaml’s service quality model (Parasuraman et al., 1985).
This questionnaire had two parts: demographics, such as sex, age, marital status,
education level and insurance status, and a 30-item questionnaire to measure five
service quality dimensions, including tangibility (seven items), reliability (nine),
responsiveness (six), assurance (four) and empathy (four). A five-point Likert scale was
used to assess each dimension (1 ¼ strongly disagree and 5 ¼ strongly agree). In this
study, Parasuraman and Zeithaml’s dimensions did not change, however, their
respective items changed according to dental services. The modified questionnaire’s
validity was confirmed using six faculty members, including four dentists and two
health service management experts. Reliability was confirmed by Cronbach’s α
coefficient (α ¼ 0. 95). Data collection lasted 15 days. A researcher was stationed in the
clinic and distributed the questionnaire to patients. If patients were illiterate then
researchers asked questions and completed the document on their behalf.
Approval
Permission to conduct our study was obtained from university heads and authorities.
Informed consent was obtained from all participating patients and all were assured about
data confidentiality. Approval for conducting this study was obtained from Baqiyatallah
Medical Sciences University ethical committee (ethical code: CH/7018/100).
Data analysis
Data were analysed using SPSS 21. 0 and Amos 18. 0 using means, standard deviations
and CFA, which was used to determine consistency between patient responses and the
proposed structural model. Second-order factor analysis was used for data analysis.
The following indices were used in the CFA: comparative fit index (CFI), root-mean-
squared error of approximation (RMSEA), degrees of freedom (df), incremental fit index
(IFI), χ2 and normed χ2.
Findings
Most patients were male (53.2 per cent), married (79 per cent), 31-40 years
(32.5 per cent), had academic and university degrees (53.8 per cent) and insurance
coverage (83.1 per cent) (Table I).
Variables Frequency (%)
Dental service
quality
Sex
Male 205 (53.2)
Female 180 (46.8)
Marital status
Single 81 (21) 681
Married 304 (79)
Having insurance coverage
Yes 320 (83.1)
No 65 (16.9)
Downloaded by Middle East Technical University At 02:39 01 February 2016 (PT)
Education level
Less than high school diploma 48 (12.5)
Diploma 130 (33.8)
Academic and university degrees 207 (53.8)
Age (years)
o20 24 (6.2)
21-30 99 (25.7)
31-40 125 (32.5)
41-50 73 (19)
W50 64 (16.6) Table I.
Note: n ¼ 385 Demographics
The 30-item questionnaire means, standard deviations (sd) and Cronbach α are shown
in Table II. Cronbach’s α coefficient for each dimension was higher than 0.7.
The most important items were: tangibility: cleanliness, materials and supplies (4.87);
reliability: dentists’ attention to patient expectations (4.83); responsiveness: easy and
quick treatment (4.64); assurance: dental skills (4.83); and empathy: paying attention to
the patients’ needs and demands (4.64) (Table II).
According to the absolute χ2 index (797.9) and given that the model’s degrees of
freedom (270) moved away from zero, and had moved towards the independent model’s
degree of freedom (326), the proposed model was deemed appropriate. The normed χ2
index, which is a relative index, showed that if the value was between 1 and 3 then the
model would be more appropriate. Therefore, because normed χ2 ¼ 2.95, the proposed
model was appropriate and acceptable. Furthermore, because RMSEA ¼ 0.078, which
was lower than 0.08, the model was acceptable. Moreover, considering that CFI ¼ 0.930
and IFI ¼ 0.947, which were more than 0.08, the model had a good fit. Generally, the
model had a good fit and was acceptable. The results showed that assurance (regression
weight ¼ 0.99) and tangibility (regression weight ¼ 0.86) had, respectively, the highest
and lowest effects on dental service quality. Also, the results indicated that all variables
had acceptable loading factors for measuring latent variables (Figure 1).
Discussion
Given the healthcare system changes and the dental service providers’ key role in
maintaining oral health, our study plays an important part in improving dental services
and promoting oral health. Also, since patient satisfaction is closely related to service
quality (Alhashem et al., 2011), their perceptions can determine failures and gaps, and
IJHCQA Quality dimensions and items Mean SD
28,7
Tangibility P1. In a good dental clinic, the equipment should be modern 4.81 0.44
(α ¼ 0.80) P2. The clinic employees should be clean, neat, tidy and
appropriate to their professions 4.75 0.43
P3. The waiting room, tables and chairs, bathrooms, toilets and
floors should be clean, beautiful, comfortable and desirable 4.71 0.54
682 P4. The card of patients’ chart numbers, pamphlets and
brochures should be appropriate and beautiful 4.28 0.77
P5. The cleanliness and quality of the materials and supplies
used for treatment should be appropriate 4.87 0.33
P6. The process of paying the bills should be easy and
comfortable 4.34 0.77
Downloaded by Middle East Technical University At 02:39 01 February 2016 (PT)
P7. The car parking space for patients should be enough around
the clinic 4.37 0.90
Reliability P8. In a good dental clinic, the patients’ physical examinations
(α ¼ 0.81) and treatments should be provided at the time that has
previously been appointed and patients should not be
delayed too much on the day of physical examination
and treatment 4.72 0.56
P9. The dentist should consider the patients’ expectations and
needs and meet them completely 4.83 0.37
P10. When explaining the treatment procedures to the patients,
the dentist should speak clear and understandable so that
they fully understand him/her 4.74 0.43
P11. In addition to the assistants and secretary, the dentist should
also explain the treatment procedures to the patients 4.61 0.52
P12. The patients’ charts should be completed without any
mistakes and maintained accurately and can easily be
found when needed 4.53 0.57
P13. The dental care costs should not be high 4.55 0.61
P14. Everything should be done correctly and without
duplication and reworking at the first time 4.74 0.48
P15. The treatment provided should be of high quality and long-
term effectiveness 4.81 0.44
P16. The dentist should give patients useful and necessary
advice for preventing them from other diseases 4.74 0.48
Responsiveness P17. In a good dental clinic, there should not be a long time
(α ¼ 0.91) between patients’ physical examinations and their
treatment procedures 4.49 0.61
P18. The treatment process should be provided quickly and
conveniently 4.64 0.48
P19. The employees should behave towards patients such that
they can trust in the dental clinic and its employees 4.62 0.56
P20. A secretary should always be accountable for arranging
the time of treatment session by phone or in person 4.51 0.70
P21. The dentist should clearly explain the problems and
diseases to the patients during the first visit and physical
examination 4.63 0.52
P22. The employees should constantly be willing to help the
Table II.
patients referred to the clinic and be ready at any time to
Factors affecting
answer their questions 4.60 0.49
dental services from
the patients’
perspective (continued )
Quality dimensions and items Mean SD
Dental service
quality
Assurance P23. In a good dental clinic, the employees should always
(α ¼ 0.71) behave towards patients with respect and courtesy and
ensure their privacy 4.74 0.43
P24. The dentist should be familiar with the newest treatment
methods, as well as the modern technologies 4.72 0.44
P25. The dentist should have sufficient skills and be good at his/ 683
her job 4.83 0.42
P26. A good dental clinic should have a good reputation among
the people so that they offer it to each other 4.53 0.57
Empathy P27. In a good dental clinic, the admission process for
(α ¼ 0.86) consultation and initial physical examination should be
Downloaded by Middle East Technical University At 02:39 01 February 2016 (PT)
28,7
684
Figure 1.
IJHCQA
service quality
model for dental
Confirmatory factor
Responsiveness had a considerable influence on service quality. This dimension Dental service
is focused on care processes, whereby patients expect that employees are available quality
when needed and interested in quickly solving their problems (Choi et al., 2005).
An important item in the responsiveness dimension was the time between patient
examination and treatment; due mainly to the highly specialized clinic wards; i.e. if a
patient needs more than one dental service then s/he is referred to a ward to set an
examination date and time. Most patients tend to be referred to the clinic only once 685
or twice. This problem may be because most patients experience referrals to a
private dental office whereby they receive services in a non-separated and
non-specialized ward. Therefore, they usually compare their physical examinations
and treatments in the public dental clinics with the private dental office. Andaleeb
(2000b) showed that employees’ non-responsiveness and their unwillingness to
Downloaded by Middle East Technical University At 02:39 01 February 2016 (PT)
provide the best services could waste patient time, money and energy. Therefore,
clinic managers should schedule and time service delivery appropriately. Also, they
should provide opportunities for employees to deliver services to the patient’s
satisfaction.
Reliability and empathy had relatively similar effects on service quality. In the
Anderson and Zwelling’s (1996) study , reliability had the greatest effect on service
quality. Reliability is the ability to provide services dependably and accurately so
that customer expectations are met. The clinic manager’s decision to cancel
the appointment for patients attending more than five minutes late, reduces to some
extent patient waiting times. However, most patients attend the clinic on time and
even earlier than the appointment, this decision has not helped to solve the patient
waiting time problem. Clinic staff should arrange patient appointments so that they
are assured that the previous patient’s physical examination and treatment is
completed before the next patient. Also, clinic admission unit staff or the ward
secretary should remind the dentist about the next patient’s appointment time as
each physical examination starts. Empathy effects service quality; i.e. it indicates
if clinic employees provide quick services and are sensitive to patient demands,
requests and complaints (Sultan and Wong, 2010). Poor empathy can lead to poor
communication between staff and patients. Therefore, improving employees-patient
communication is recommended. Increasing total specialists and diagnostic
equipment can improve patient admission for consultations and initial physical
examinations. If services are intangible then interpersonal interactions during
service delivery can significantly affect service quality perceptions (Brady and
Cronin, 2001). Studies that show the human element’s effects on patient perceptions
can demonstrate empathy’s importance (Mohd Suki et al., 2009; Padma et al., 2010;
Rose et al., 2004).
Our study has limitations, service quality in our study was measured only from
patient perspectives. Other stakeholders and interest groups’ views, including dentists,
managers and other service providers have not been considered.
686 References
Al-Hussyeen, A.J. (2010), “Factors affecting utilization of dental health services and
satisfaction among adolescent females in Riyadh City”, Saudi Dental Journal, Vol. 22
No. 1, pp. 19-25.
Alhashem, A.M., Alquraini, H. and Chowdhury, R.I. (2011), “Factors influencing patient
satisfaction in primary healthcare clinics in Kuwait”, International Journal of Health Care
Downloaded by Middle East Technical University At 02:39 01 February 2016 (PT)
DeMoranville, C.W. and Bienstock, C.C. (2003), “Question order effects in measuring service
quality”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 217-231.
Dewi, F.D., Sudjana, G. and Oesman, Y.M. (2011), “Patient satisfaction analysis on service quality
of dental healthcare based on empathy and responsiveness”, Dental Resarch Journal, Vol. 8
No. 4, pp. 172-177.
Greenfield, D. and Braithwaite, J. (2008), “Health sector accreditation research: a systematic
review”, International Journal of Quality Health Care, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 172-183.
Groene, O., Skau, J.K. and Frolich, A. (2008), “An international review of projects on hospital
performance assessment”, International Journal of Quality Health Care, Vol. 20 No. 3,
pp. 162-171.
Hasin, M., Seeluangsawat, R., Shareef, M. (2001), “Statistical measures of customer satisfaction
for healthcare quality assurance: a case study”, International Journal of Healthcare Quality
Assurance, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 6-14.
Jenkinson, C., Burton, J.S., Cartwright, J., Magee, H., Hall, I., Alcock, C. and Burge, S. (2005),
“Patient attitudes to clinical trials: development of a questionnaire and results from asthma
and cancer patients”, Health Expect, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 244-252.
John, J., Yatim, F.M. and Mani, S.A. (2011), “Measuring service quality of public dental healthcare
facilities in kelantan, Malaysia”, Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, Vol. 23 No. 5,
pp. 742-753.
Karassavidou, E., Glaveli, N. and Papadopoulos, C.T. (2009), “Quality in NHS hospitals:
no one knows better than patients”, Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 13 No. 1,
pp. 34-46.
Karydis, A., Komboli-Kodovazeniti, M., Hatzigeorgiou, D. and Panis, V. (2001), “Expectations and
perceptions of greek patients regarding the quality of dental health care”, International
Journal of Healthcare Quality, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 409-416.
Kenny, D.J., Conway, R.M. and Johnston, D.H. (1999), “The development of ISO 9002 quality
management standards for Canadian dental practices”, Journal of Canadian Dental
Association, Vol. 65 No. 2, pp. 105-108.
Kong, M. and Jogaratnam, G. (2007), “The influence of culture on perceptions of service employee
behavior”, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 275-297.
Kress, G.C. Jr (1988), “Patient satisfaction with dental care”, Dental Clinical of North America,
Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 791-802.
Lee, M.A. and Yom, Y.H. (2007), “A comparative study of patients’ and nurses’ perceptions
of the quality of nursing services, satisfaction and intent to revisit the hospital:
a questionnaire survey”, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Vol. 44 No. 4,
pp. 545-555.
IJHCQA Lim, P.C. and Tang, N.K. (2000), “A study of patients’ expectations and satisfaction in
Singapore hospitals”, International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 13
28,7 Nos 6-7, pp. 290-299.
Lin, D.J., Li, Y.H., Pai, J.Y., Sheu, I.C., Glen, R., Chou, M.J. and Lee, C.Y. (2009), “Chronic
kidney-disease screening service quality: questionnaire survey research evidence from
taichung city”, BMC Health Services Reserch, Vol. 9, pp. 239.
688 McCabe, C. (2004), “Nurse-patient communication: an exploration of patients’ experiences”,
Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 41-49.
Manias, E. (2010), “Medication communication: a concept analysis”, Journal of Advances Nursing,
Vol. 66 No. 4, pp. 933-943.
Merle, V., Germain, J.M., Tavolacci, M.P., Brocard, C., Chefson, C., Cyvoct, C., Edouard, S., Guet, L.,
Downloaded by Middle East Technical University At 02:39 01 February 2016 (PT)
Corresponding author
Dr Mohammadkarim Bahadori can be contacted at: bahadorihealth@gmail.com; m.bahadori@
bmsu.ac.ir
For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
Or contact us for further details: permissions@emeraldinsight.com