Sie sind auf Seite 1von 232

ANPQP_index

ANPQP Version 3.0 Phase Diagram (Matrix)

Explanation of the Matrix Project Milestones
Complete document Submit document Obtain approval
1 Must Must Must
(1) If Renault/Nissan requests If Renault/Nissan requests If Renault/Nissan requests
2 Must Must N/A
(2) If Renault/Nissan requests If Renault/Nissan requests N/A
3 Must If Renault/Nissan requests N/A ISO/TS
Document submission timing 16949
Activity timing (Document to be submitted upon changes or Renault/Nissan requests)
Phase 1 Phase 5
Category Output Document & Document Completion Instruction (DCI) Phase 2
Requirements Phase 3 Phase 4 Ramp­Up and
Design
Review and Off­Tool Off­Process Mass
Completion
Planning Production
Element Activity Name DCI Format Example
L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H

1. CONTRACT REVIEW Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

1.1 Product and Process Concept Product and Process Concept Proposal DCI 2 2 2


Study (PPCP)

Product Quality Target Study Plan (PQTSP) DCI 2 2 2 7.1­7.2


1.2 Product Quality and Reliability
Management Product Reliability Target Study Plan DCI 2 2 2
(PRTSP)

2. SUB­SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

Component Supply Chain Management
DCI 2 2 2 2 2 2
(CSCC) 7.3­7.4,
2.1 Sub­Supplier Management
8.2
Sub­Supplier PSW or equivalent (SSPSW) DCI (2) (2) (2)

3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

3.1 Identification of Project Team Supplier Contact Directory (SCD) DCI 2 2 2

https://suppliers.renault.com/anpqp/v3/ANPQP­Ver­3_EN/ANPQP/matrix­en­30_general.htm 1/4
ANPQP_index

Supplier Master Schedule (SMS) DCI 2 2 2

Supplier Production Preparation Monitoring DCI 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 2
3.2 Project Planning and Plan/Status Report (SPPMP/SR) 5.5, 7.1­
Production Preparation Monitoring 7.6
Production Capacity Plan (PCP) DCI 2 2 2 3 2 2

Capacity Submission Warrant
Renault DCI 1 1 1
(CSW)
3.3 Project Risk and Concern
Project Development Record (PDR) DCI 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Management

4. PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

Suppliers Internal DR Record (SIDRR) DCI 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

4.1 Product and Process Design
Full Process DR Record (FPDRR) DCI 2 2 2 2
Review

Quick DR Record (QDRR) DCI 2 (2) (2) (2)

System Structure Diagram (SSD) DCI (2) (2) 2

Function Block Diagram (FBD) DCI (2) (2) 2

Design Potential FMEA DCI 3 3 2
4.2 Design Failure Mode 
and Effects Analysis
Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) DCI (2) (2) (2)

Change List (CL) DCI (2) 2 (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2)

DRBFM Work Sheet DCI (2) 2 (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) 7.1­7.5,
8.2
HCPP Renault DCI (2) 2 2

QA Table A Nissan DCI (2) (2) (2)


4.3 Identification and Deployment
Supplier Feasibility Commitment
of Special Characteristics and Key Renault DCI 2 2 2
(SFC)
Features
QA Table B Nissan DCI (2) (2) (2)

Special Characteristics and Key Feature
DCI 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2
4.4 Engineering Product Diagram (SCKFD)
Specifications / Drawing Study and Engineering Product Specifications
  Completion DCI 1 1 1
https://suppliers.renault.com/anpqp/v3/ANPQP­Ver­3_EN/ANPQP/matrix­en­30_general.htm 2/4
ANPQP_index
and Engineering Drawings / CAD data

Supplier Recommendations (SR) Renault DCI 2 2 2 2 2 2

4.5 Special Renault
Certificate of Certification (COC)
Characteristics DCI (2) (2) (2)
/Conformity of Product (COP)
Management Nissan

5. MANUFACTURING PROCESS DEVELOPMENT Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

5.1 Process Failure Mode 
Process Potential FMEA DCI 3 3 2
and Effect Analysis

Control Plan (CP) DCI (2) (2) (2) 3 2 2 1 1 1

Matrix Quality Assurance (MQA) Renault DCI (2) (2) (2)

5.2 Manufacturing Process Design Process Flow Chart (PFC) DCI (2) (2) (2) 3 2 2 2 2 2

Floor Plan Layout (FPL) DCI 3 3 3 3 3 3

Work Instruction (WI) DCI 3 3 3

5.3 Tooling, Gauges and Facility Gauge Specification and Approval Sheet 7.2­7.6,


DCI 3 2 2 3 1 1 8.5
Management (GSAS)

Process Capability Study Plan (PCSP) DCI 3 2 2
5.4 Process Capability Study and
Improvement
Process Capability Study Result (PCSR) DCI (2) 2 2 (2) 2 2 (2) (2) (2)

5.5 Confirmation of Full Volume Full Volume Confirmation Audit Results DCI 3 3 3


Conditions (FVCAR)

Ram­Up Activity Plan (RUAP) DCI 3 2 2
5.6 Activities during Ramp­Up
Ramp­Up Activity Concern and DCI (2) (2) (2)
Countermeasure Report (RUACCR)

5.7 Identification and Traceability ­ ­ ­                              

6. PRODUCT CONFIRMATION Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

Supplier Digital Test Report (SDTR) DCI (2) (2) (2)

6.1 Design Verification and Supplier Test Plan and Report (STPR) DCI 2 2 2 2 2 2


7.3
https://suppliers.renault.com/anpqp/v3/ANPQP­Ver­3_EN/ANPQP/matrix­en­30_general.htm 3/4
31/10/2016 ANPQP_index
Product/Process Validation
Inspection Report (IR) DCI (2) (2) (2) 2 2 2 2 2 2

Appearance Approval Report 
Nissan DCI (1) (1) (1)
(AAR)

7. PRODUCTION PART APPROVAL Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

7.1 Production Part Approval Part Submission Warrant (PSW) DCI 1 1 1 7.3, 7.5

8. NON CONFORMING PRODUCT MANAGEMENT Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

8.1 Non Conforming Product 8D Concern and Countermeasure Report
DCI (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) 8.3, 8.5
Management Summary (8D­CCR)

9. CHANGE MANAGEMENT Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

9.1 Design Change Management Design Change Request (DCR) DCI (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1)
7.1­7.4,
9.2 Process/Facility Site Change Process/Facility Site Change Request 8.5
DCI (1) (1) (1)
Management (PFCR)

10. LOGISTICS and PACKAGING Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

10.1 Logistics and Packaging Logistics and Packaging Data Sheet (LPDS) DCI 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 7.4, 7.5

11. ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENT Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

11.1 Environmental Requirement International Material Data System (IMDS) DCI 2 2 2 ­

Copyright © Renault / Nissan

https://suppliers.renault.com/anpqp/v3/ANPQP­Ver­3_EN/ANPQP/matrix­en­30_general.htm 4/4
1. CONTRACT REVIEW

Category Purpose:

 To prompt the study of the Request for Quotation (RFQ) files received from Renault-Nissan and identify the technical
aspects of the program.

Element Activity:

 1.1 Product & Process Concept Study


 1.2 Product Quality and Reliability Management

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
1.1 Product & Process Concept Study

Activity Purpose:

 To demonstrate that the product and process proposal will achieve the Renault -Nissan targets.

Note(s):

 The Product & Process Concept Proposal should be part of the detailed response to the Renault -Nissan provided Request for
Quotation (RFQ) package.
 The supplier shall conduct a contract review including all technical aspects of the RFQ package.

Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity  Study and develop a Product & Process
Content Concept proposal which achieves all
targets requested by Renault- Nissan.
Output  Product and Process Concept Proposal
Document

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number:

 7.1 Planning of product realization


 7.2 Customer-related process

Return to the ANPQP Matrix

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Product & Process Concept Proposal (PPCP)

Key Point(s):

 The Product & Process Concept Proposal is a part of the technical response to the Request for Quotation (RFQ) file.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The Product & Process Concept Proposal shall include:


 Design concept to support the project design targets.
 Preliminary sketches, drawings/Computer Aided Design (CAD) data of the product.
 Presentation of the functions and kinematics, through digital simulations.
 Preliminary identification of product Special Characteristics & Key Features.
 Preliminary Bill of Materials (BOM).
 Estimated mass.
 Explanation of proposed new technologies and differences from the current design.
 Proposed manufacturing site.
 Product and process design validation plan.
 Process and tooling preparation plan for achievement of Renault-Nissan targets.
 For more detailed information on these requirements, please contact the relevant Renault-Nissan department.

Output Document Description:

 The relevant Renault-Nissan department designated format or supplier own document.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
1.2 Product Quality and Reliability Management

Activity Purpose:

 To prepare and implement a plan to achieve all the product quality and reliability targets agreed with Renault-Nissan.

Requirement(s):

 The Product Quality Target Study Plan and Product Reliability Target Study Plan shall be part of the detailed response to the Renault-
Nissan issued the Request for Quotation (RFQ) package.
 Implement the plan and deploy the quality and reliability target agreed with Renault-Nissan into the product and process design.

Activity Content(s) & Output Document(s):

Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity  Compare the target  Implement the plan and report the progress to the relevant
Content set by Renault-Nissan department.
Renault-Nissan with
the performance.
(gap analysis)
 Prepare a plan to
achieve the target.
Output  Product Quality Target Study Plan
Document  Product Reliability Target Study

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number:

 7.1 Planning of product realization


 7.2 Customer-related process

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Product Quality Target Study Plan (PQTSP)

Key Point(s):

 The Product Quality Target Study Plan is the document that describes how the supplier will achieve the quality target agreed with
Renault-Nissan. (This will be requested through Request for Quotation (RFQ) or relevant document)

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The Product Quality Target Study Plan shall include:


 A gap analysis which compares the target set by Renault-Nissan to the supplier’s current performance
 A plan of actions defined by the supplier that shall be implemented to achieve the target.
 The plan of actions shall include:
 Timing of key events with responsible people, deadlines.
 Analysis and calculation methods to be used to achieve quality targets and, where applicable, sub-component quality target
proposed by the tier 1 supplier.

Output Document Description:

 The relevant Renault-Nissan department designated format or supplier own document.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Product Reliability Target Study Plan (PRTSP)

Key Point(s):

 The Product Reliability Target Study Plan is the document that describes how the supplier will achieve the reliability target agreed with the
Renault-Nissan (which will be requested through Request for Quotation (RFQ) or relevant document).
 The reliability requirement is defined in the supplier specification as a proportion of failures at a mileage term in RFQ if applicable.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):


 The Product Reliability Target Study Plan shall include:
 The validation plan to reach the reliability target
 A gap analysis which compares the target set by Renault-Nissan to the supplier’s current performance.
 A plan of actions defined by the supplier that shall be implemented to achieve the target. This plan of actions shall include:
 Timing of key events with responsible people, deadlines.
 Analysis and calculation methods to be used to achieve quality target.

Output Document Description:

 The relevant Renault-Nissan department designated format or supplier own document.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
2. SUB-SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT

Category Purpose:

 Identify and manage the supply chain (including the deployment of Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP) activities to all the
sub-suppliers).

Element Activity:

 2.1 Sub-Supplier Management

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
2.1 Sub-Supplier Management

Activity Purpose:

 To manage all sub-suppliers to ensure products delivered to Renault-Nissan achieve targets.

Note(s):

 The suppliers shall have a system for new sub-suppliers selection and current performance evaluation (Criteria for selection,
evaluation and re-evaluation).
 All purchased products or materials used in product shall conform to the applicable regulatory/Renault-Nissan requirements. Supplier
is responsible for cascading all requirements to their sub-suppliers to ensure that all Renault-Nissan specifications and targets are
met and sustained throughout the life of the product.
 The suppliers shall be responsible for the management and approval of the product quality and the associated document (e.g. Part
Submission Warrant (PSW) and equivalent documents) for all sub-supplier's (including those specified by Renault-Nissan) unless
otherwise agreed in the Request for Quotation (RFQ).
 No sub-supplier changes are allowed in Phase 4, unless otherwise agreed by Renault-Nissan.

Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity  Select the potential  Submit the CSCC  Update the CSCC  Submit the CSCC  Update the CSCC
Content sub-suppliers and document based on whenever there are document after document whenever
make a draft the result of product any changes to the identification of all there are changes to
document of feasibility study. sub-suppliers. the sub-suppliers the sub-suppliers
Component Supply before the start of and re submit.
Chain Chart (CSCC). mass production.
 Validate and
approve the
sub-supplier PSW or
equivalent before
start mass
production and
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
submit it if requested
by Renault-Nissan.
Output  Component Supply Chain Chart (CSCC)
Document  Sub-Supplier Part Submission Warrant (PSW) or equivalent

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number:

 7.3 Design and development (e.g. 7.3.6 Design and development validation)
 7.4 Purchasing
 8.2 Monitoring and measurement (e.g. 8.2.4 Monitoring and measurement of product)

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Component Supply Chain Chart (CSCC)

Key Point(s):

 The Component Supply Chain Chart (CSCC) is a chart which visualizes the structure of the component supply chain to reinforce the sub supplier
management.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The CSCC shall cover all tiers of the supply chain down to raw material level (including grease, sealant, solder, etc.).
 The document shall include details of the supplier names, plant locations, development experience and responsibility.
 Special Characteristics shall be identified at each tier using the appropriate symbols (Refer to the “4.5 Special Characteristics
Management”)
 Key Features (as required) should be identified at each tier.

Output Document Description:

Item Completion Instructions


R / N Project The Renault-Nissan Vehicle/Power train project for which the product is being
developed / manufactured.
Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed / manufactured.
Renault - CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Document Reference No./Version The suppliers reference No. and version No. for the document.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name The supplier name.
Supplier Plant The location at which the product will be manufactured.
Supplier Code A unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault- Nissan purchasing department.
Author The name of the person who created/revised the document.
e-mail The e-mail address of the person who created/revised the document.
Tel The telephone number of the person who created/revised the document.
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing.
Part No. & Issue Level The part No. and issue level as issued by Renault-Nissan design department.
Design Note No./DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed /
manufactured.
Supply Chain Structure and their component Describe Supply Chain Structure with component parts name.
parts' name (Tier 1, Tier 2 .......Tier N) (When completing the document, enter the text directly into the cells on the excel sheet.
Do not use text boxes to complete the document.)
Supplier Supplier Name The supplier name at which the products are manufactured.
Feature Manufacturing Plant Name The plant name or location at which the products are manufactured.
Plant Country The country where the manufacturing plant is located.
State, City The city and state where the manufacturing plant is located.
Business New for the Input "Yes" if the sub-supplier is new to the Tier N supplier (no previous business
Experience Tier N relation).
supplier
Renault-Nissan specified Input "Yes" if the Tier N supplier is specified by Renault-Nissan
Manufacturin Plant/ New for the Input "Yes" if only a new manufacturing process or production line is used by the
g Feature Process/ supplier supplier in an existing Plant. Input "Greenfield" if a new manufacturing plant has to be
Line built and used by the supplier.
Method / New for the Input "Yes" if the product is manufactured using a new production method for the
Technology supplier supplier.
Product Feature New Input "Yes" if the product is a new commodity for the supplier. (e.g. A metal supplier
commodity for who will produce plastic parts for the first time etc.)
Tier1
Development responsibility of the Tier N Information regarding the development responsibility of the Tier N supplier. Input "Yes"
supplier if the Tier N supplier has responsibility for development, such as making the part
drawing. Input "No" if the Tier N supplier does not have responsibility for development.
Development Development experience Previous development and mass production experience of parts where function and
experience of performance requirements are similar to this part. Input "Yes" if the Tier N supplier has
the Tier N previous experience.
supplier (Where Vehicle manufacturer and Input the name of the vehicle manufacturer and the vehicle model if the Tier N supplier
the supplier has vehicle model has previous development and mass production experience.
development
responsibility)

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
(Blank) It can be used to inform the Renault-Nissan about main risks identified in the supply
chain.

Note(s):

 Additional detail may be requested depending on the Renault-Nissan requirement.


 The logistic features as lead time (in number of days) between Tier N suppliers

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
ANPQP - COMPONENT SUPPLY CHAIN CHART (CSCC)

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc. Ref. No./Ver.: N-CSCC417 Iss. 2
X65K Doc Rev. Date: 2011/3/2
A B C OBD R
2
Doc. Origin Date: 2011/3/4
Supplier Name: AAA Industry Co. Supplier Code: 1F86 E-mail: m-i@abc.com
Supplier Plant: Nanjing Author: M Ince Tel: +86 458 745615
Part Name: Pedal Compl - Brake w/brkt Remark:
Part No. & Issue Level: 18002 JR458
Design Note No. / DEVO: T0F587
*= Additional detail may be requested dependin on project and customer
Development
Supplier Feature Manufacturing Feature experience of the
Product Tier N supplier
Business *
Feature (Where the

Development responsibility
Plant/Proc Method /
Product Structure Manufacturing Plant Experienc supplier has

of the Tier N supplier


ess/Line technology development
e

Renault/Nissan specified
New for the Tier N supplier

New commodity for Tier1

Development experience
Location

Vehicle manufacturer
New for the supplier

New for the supplier

and vehicle model


Supplier
Name
Plant Name

*
Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5…N Country State, City

PEDAL COMPL -
AAA Industry Nanjing Plant China Chuzhou Y Y Y Y X64K
BRAKE W/BRKT

BRKT ASSY -
RJ Stampings Wuhan Plant China Xiaogan N
BRAKE PEDAL

BRKT - BRAKE
RJ Stampings Wuhan Plant China Xiaogan N
PEDAL

Chennai
Raw Material CA Steel India Chennai Y Y N
Plant

REINF -
RJ Stampings Mumbai Plant Inda Mumbai N
BRAKE

Chennai
Raw Material CA Steel India Chennai Y Y N
Plant

SLIDE PLATE
AAA Industry Nanjing Plant China Chuzhou Y Y Y Y X64K
- BRAKE

Chennai
Raw Material CA Steel India Chennai Y Y N
Plant

LEVER
AAA Industry Nanjing Plant China Chuzhou Y Y Y Y X64K
COMPL -

PEDAL ASSY
AAA Industry Nanjing Plant China Chuzhou Y Y N
- BRAKE

LEVER ASSY -
BRAKE PEDAL
AAA Industry Nanjing Plant China Chuzhou Y Y N

Chennai
Raw Material CA Steel India Chennai Y Y N
Plant

TUBE -
AAA Industry Nanjing Plant China Chuzhou Y Y N
FULCRUM

Chennai
Raw Material CA Steel India Chennai Y Y N
Plant

Swansea
Raw Material NT Limited Wales Swansea N
Plant

PLATE -
PEDAL PAD
AAA Industry Nanjing Plant China Chuzhou Y Y N

Chennai
Raw Material CA Steel India Chennai Y Y N
Plant

Swansea
Raw Material NT Limited Wales Swansea N
Plant

STP - BRKT RJ Stampings Mumbai Plant Inda Mumbai N

Chennai
Raw Material CA Steel India Chennai Y Y N
Plant

Rubber
Raw Material Bursa Plant Turkey Gemlik N
Industries

RUB - PEDAL STOPPER Rubber


(2pcs) Bursa Plant Turkey Gemlik N
Industries

BUSH - PEDAL OK
Seoul Plant Korea Seoul Y N
(2pcs) Components

COVER - PEDAL Rubber


Bursa Plant Turkey Gemlik N
PAD Industries

XL
GREASE Atsugi Plant Japan Atsugi N
Lubricants

SUB BRKT ASSY


RJ Stampings Mumbai Plant Inda Mumbai N
- BRAKE PEDAL

SUB BRKT -
RJ Stampings Mumbai Plant Inda Mumbai N
BRAKE PEDAL

Chennai
Raw Material CA Steel India Chennai Y Y N
Plant

BUSH - OK
Seoul Plant Korea Seoul Y N
PEDAL Components

PIN - Guadalajara Santa


Pins Co Mexico N
FULCRUM Plant Maria

Bourges
Rolled Sheet Rollem Up France Bourges N
Plant

Swansea
Raw Material NT Limited Wales Swansea N
Plant

SPRING - OK
Seoul Plant Korea Seoul Y N
RETURN PEDAL Components

Guadalajara Santa
PIN - FULCRUM Pins Co Mexico N
Plant Maria

Bourges
Rolled Sheet Rollem Up France Bourges N
Plant

Swansea
Raw Material NT Limited Wales Swansea N
Plant

XL
GREASE Atsugi Plant Japan Atsugi N
Lubricants

RIVET - BLIND, OK
RD, HD OPEN
Seoul Plant Korea Seoul Y N
Components

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Sub-Supplier Part Submission Warrant (PSW) or equivalent – (SSPSW)

Key Point(s):

 The Sub-supplier Part Submission Warrant (PSW) or equivalent is a document that affirms to the tier 1 supplier the ability of his sub-supplier to
deliver components, which finally allow the final product to meet Renault-Nissan requirements.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

The following contents shall be included.


 The record to validate each component of the final product delivered by the sub-suppliers.
 The record to validate each change. (e.g. new equipment/ tooling/ production facility or plant location)
(Refer to the “9.1 Design Change Management” and “9.2 Process / Facility Site Change management”)
 The Sub-supplier PSW or equivalent has to take into account, at least:
 Name of the component
 Status of the approval
 Component drawing status
 Inspection report
 Test report
 Control plan and process flow chart
 Other documents required by the tier 1 supplier.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Category Purpose:

 Identify the requirements, risks and timing associated with managing a project through all phases of Alliance New Product Quality Procedure
(ANPQP).

Element Activity:

 3.1 Identification of Project Team


 3.2 Project Planning and Production Preparation Monitoring
 3.3 Project Risk and Concern Management

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
3.1 Identification of Project Team

Activity Purpose:

 Describe the specific organization necessary to manage the product realization.

Note(s):

 Each supplier shall be required to nominate at least one Supplier ANPQP Representative (SAR) for their organization. This person will be
responsible for ensuring that the requirements of ANPQP are deployed through each related function in their organization. As a result, the
nominated SAR(s) shall have sufficient responsibility and authority within their company to successfully undertake these responsibilities.

Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity  Select a team leader to  Update and resubmit the Supplier Contact Directory when necessary
Content supervise the planned
development process.
 Select a project team and
assign roles and
responsibilities.
 Create a Supplier Contact
Directory.
Output  Supplier Contact Directory
Document

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number:

 5.5 Responsibility, authority and communication

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Supplier Contact Directory (SCD)

Key Point(s):

 The Supplier Contact Directory is the document which gives the contact details of the multi-function team members named by the Supplier's Senior
Management. It demonstrates that all the necessary resources to achieve the Renault-Nissan targets are in place.
 The Supplier Contact Directory has three pages and covers;
 Head Office
 Project Team
 Manufacturing Plant

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The Supplier Contact Directory shall be provided at the start of a project. A re-submission of the document is required every time any of the
information changes.
 The supplier shall add all useful contacts to this format.

Output Document Description:

Item Completion Instructions


R / N Project The Renault-Nissan Vehicle/Power train project for which the product is being
developed/manufactured.
Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed / manufactured.
Renault – CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Document Reference No./Version The suppliers reference No. and version No. for the document.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name The supplier name.
Supplier Plant The location at which the product will be manufactured.
Supplier Code A unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault- Nissan purchasing department.
Author The name of the person who created/revised the document.
e-mail The e-mail address of the person who created/revised the document.
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Tel The telephone number of the person who created/revised the document.
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing.
Part No. & Issue Level: The part No. and issue level as issued by Renault-Nissan design department.
Design Note No./DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed/manufactured.
Head Office Contacts
Address Address for the location corresponding to the supplier code.
Post Code Post Code of the above location.
Telephone Telephone number of the above location.
Fax Facsimile number of the above location
EDI Number Supplier registration number for Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) purposes.
Supplier to Renault/ Nissan Tick appropriate box(es).
Logistics Partner Company (if any) who provides logistics service between the manufacturing location and the
customer plant.
Delivery Type Agreement terms in place for delivery of the product to the customer plant (e.g. Ex-works, CIF,
etc.).
Annual Holidays Dates and duration of all annual holidays (e.g. Summer, Winter etc.).
Name Name of the person in this position or responsible for this contact area.
Telephone Telephone number for the above.
Mobile Mobile telephone number for the above.
Contacts
E-mail E-mail address for the above.
Fax Facsimile number for the above.
Job Title The job title of the above.
Provided by Name of the person who completed the form.
Signed Signature of the person who completed the form.
Position Position of the person who completed the form.
Date Date when the form was completed.
Project Team Contacts
(Complete as above plus) (Complete as above plus)
Working Patterns Shift Name of each production shift in operation at the manufacturing location.
From Start time of each production shift in operation at the manufacturing location.
To End time of each production shift in operation at the manufacturing location.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
3rd Party Rep. Third Party representing the production workers at the manufacturing location.
Start Start date of the pay negotiations for production workers at the manufacturing location.
Pay Negotiations
End End date of the pay negotiations for production workers at the manufacturing location.
Frequency Frequency of the pay negotiations for production workers at the manufacturing location.
Manufacturing Plant Contacts
(Complete as above) (Complete as above)

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
ANPQP - SUPPLIER CONTACT DIRECTORY

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc. Ref. No./Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
JR100 Doc Rev. Date: 2012/2/12
A B C OBD 2
R Doc. Origin Date: 2011/3/23
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: mayne-mannI@abc.com
Supplier Plant: Barcelona Author: I Mayne-Mann Tel: +3344444444
Part Name: Front Carpet Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 82005 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T06854
Head Office Contacts
Address: Logistics:
Unit 15
An Industrial Estate Logistics Partner: U-Haul
Somewhere Delivery Type: Ex Works

Annual Holidays:
Postcode: 65482 Supplier to: From To Duration
Tel No: 00 56 845 54 45 54 Summer Shutdown: 2012/7/23 2012/8/6 10
Renault
Fax No: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Winter Shutdown: 2012/12/23 2013/1/2 7
EDI Number: ABC11111 Nissan Other Shutdown: - - -

Managing Director Design Director Information Systems Director


Name: I Mayne-Mann Name: M. Ideas Name: I M Tekky
Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 51 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 53 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 60
Mobile: 00 56 768 60 60 60 Mobile: 00 56 768 60 60 60 Mobile: 00 56 768 60 60 70
E-mail: mayne-mannI@ABC.com E-mail: IdeasM@ABC.com E-mail: TekkyI@ABC.com
Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56
Job Title: Head Office Senior Manager Job Title: Design Team Senior Manager Job Title: IT Manager

Project Leader Logistics Director Commercial Director


Name: N E Body Name: N Logis Name: K. Morkst
Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 52 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 54 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 55
Mobile: 00 56 768 60 60 62 Mobile: 00 56 768 12 34 44 Mobile: 00 56 768 12 43 99
E-mail: BodyN@ABC.com E-mail: LogisN@ABC.com E-mail: MorkstK@ABC.com
Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56
Job Title: Project Manager Job Title: Logistics Director Job Title: Commercial Director

Quality Director Purchasing Director Production Control Director


Name: S O Else Name: I Cost Name: N E Body
Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 53 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 60 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 52
Mobile: 00 56 768 60 60 63 Mobile: 00 56 768 42 58 51 Mobile: 00 56 768 60 60 62
E-mail: ElseS@ABC.com E-mail: CostI@ABC.Com E-mail: BodyNE@ABC.com
Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56
Job Title: Quality Engineer Job Title: Purshasing Dpt Leader Job Title: Control Team Leader

Supplier ANPQP Representative (S.A.R) Emergency Contact


Name: Ch Kleen Name: L Martini Name:
Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 34 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 91 Telephone:
Mobile: 00 56 768 60 33 21 Mobile: 00 56 768 60 60 90 Mobile:
E-mail: KleenCh@ABC.com E-mail: MartiniL@ABC.com E-mail:
Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax:
Job Title: ANPQP Facilitator Job Title: Emergency & Safety Team Leader Job Title:

Name: Name: Name:


Telephone: Telephone: Telephone:
Mobile: Mobile: Mobile:
E-mail: E-mail: E-mail:
Fax: Fax: Fax:
Job Title: Job Title: Job Title:

Name: Name: Name:


Telephone: Telephone: Telephone:
Mobile: Mobile: Mobile:
E-mail: E-mail: E-mail:
Fax: Fax: Fax:
Job Title: Job Title: Job Title:

Provided by: I Mayne-Mann Signature: MIMAyne

Position: Head Office Senior Manager Date: 2012/2/15

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


ANPQP - SUPPLIER CONTACT DIRECTORY

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc. Ref. No./Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
JR100 Doc Rev. Date: 2012/2/12
A B C OBD 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2011/3/23
R
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: mayne-mannI@abc.com
Supplier Plant: Barcelona Author: I Mayne-Mann Tel: +3344444444
Part Name: Front Carpet Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 82005 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T06854
Project Team Contacts
Address: Logistics:
Unit 15
An Industrial Estate Logistics Partner: U-Haul
Somewhere Delivery Type: Ex Works

Annual Holidays:
Postcode: 65482 Supplier to: From To Duration
Tel No: 00 56 845 54 45 54 Renault Summer Shutdown: 2012/7/23 2012/8/6 10
Fax No: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Winter Shutdown: 2012/12/23 2013/1/2 7
EDI Number: ABC11111 Nissan Other Shutdown: - - -

Working Patterns: Pay Negotiations:


Shift: From: To: 3rd Party Rep. Start End Frequency
Day Mon-Thurs 8:15 17:30 AUEW July October 2 yrs
Day Fri 8:15 15:00 ASTMS June September 2 yrs
Night Mon-Thurs 20:30 7:30

Managing Director Design Contact Information Systems Contact


Name: I Mayne-Mann Name: M. Ideas Name: M. Ideas
Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 51 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 53 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 53
Mobile: 00 56 768 60 60 60 Mobile: 00 56 768 60 60 60 Mobile: 00 56 768 60 60 60
E-mail: mayne-mannI@ABC.com E-mail: IdeasM@ABC.com E-mail: IdeasM@ABC.com
Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56
Job Title: Head Office Senior Manager Job Title: Design Team Senior Manager Job Title: Design Team Senior Manager

Project Leader Logistics Manager Commercial Contact


Name: N E Body Name: N Logis Name: T Bernt
Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 52 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 54 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 90 01
Mobile: 00 56 768 60 60 62 Mobile: 00 56 768 12 34 44 Mobile: 00 56 768 23 33 21
E-mail: BodyN@ABC.com E-mail: LogisN@ABC.com E-mail: BerntT@ABC.com
Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56
Job Title: Project Manager Job Title: Logistics Director Job Title: International Sales Responsible

Quality Contact Purchasing Contact Digital Simulation Testing Contact


Name: T Hope Name: I Cost Name: V Efem
Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 69 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 60 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 69
Mobile: 00 56 768 60 60 68 Mobile: 00 56 768 42 58 51 Mobile: 00 56 768 22 39 51
E-mail: BodyN@ABC.com E-mail: CostI@ABC.Com E-mail: EfemV@ABC.com
Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56
Job Title: Quality Engineer Job Title: Purshasing Dpt Leader Job Title: FEA Calcul. & Simul. Manager

ANPQP Document Contact Lab / Trials Contact Safety and Regulation Contact
Name: Ch Kleen Name: B Note Name: N Sinc
Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 34 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 30 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 57
Mobile: 00 56 768 60 33 21 Mobile: 00 56 768 60 33 20 Mobile: 00 56 768 60 60 67
E-mail: KleenCh@ABC.com E-mail: NoteB@ABC.com E-mail: SincN@ABC.com
Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56
Job Title: ANPQP Facilitator Job Title: Testing Facilities Leader Job Title: Design Manager

Inspection Contact Service Parts Contact Production Control Contact


Name: I Hawkeye Name: A John Name: N E Body
Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 55 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 90 30 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 52
Mobile: 00 56 768 60 60 65 Mobile: 00 56 768 23 33 50 Mobile: 00 56 768 60 60 62
E-mail: HawkeyeI@ABC.com E-mail: JohnA@ABC.com E-mail: BodyNE@ABC.com
Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56
Job Title: Inspection Supervisor Job Title: Aftersales Team Leader Job Title: Control Team Leader

Supplier ANPQP Representative (S.A.R)


Name: Ch Kleen Name: Name:
Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 34 Telephone: Telephone:
Mobile: 00 56 768 60 33 21 Mobile: Mobile:
E-mail: KleenCh@ABC.com E-mail: E-mail:
Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: Fax:
Job Title: ANPQP Facilitator Job Title: Job Title:

Provided by: I Mayne-Mann Signature: MIMAyne

Position: Head Office Senior Manager Date: 2012/2/15

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


ANPQP - SUPPLIER CONTACT DIRECTORY

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc. Ref. No./Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
JR100 Doc Rev. Date: 2012/2/12
A B C OBD 2
R Doc. Origin Date: 2011/3/23
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: mayne-mannI@abc.com
Supplier Plant: Barcelona Author: I Mayne-Mann Tel: +3344444444
Part Name: Front Carpet Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 82005 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T06854
Manufacturing Plant Contacts
Address: Logistics:
Unit 15
An Industrial Estate Logistics Partner: U-Haul
Somewhere Delivery Type: Ex Works

Annual Holidays:
Postcode: 65482 Supplier to: From To Duration
Tel No: 00 56 845 54 45 54 Renault Summer Shutdown: 2012/7/23 2012/8/6 10
Fax No: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Winter Shutdown: 2012/12/23 2013/1/2 7
EDI Number: ABC11111 Nissan Other Shutdown: - - -

Working Patterns: Pay Negotiations:


Shift: From: To: 3rd Party Rep. Start End Frequency
Day Mon-Thurs 8:15 17:30 AUEW July October 2 yrs
Day Fri 8:15 15:00 ASTMS June September 2 yrs
Night Mon-Thurs 20:30 7:30

Managing Director Production Planning Contact Information Systems Contact


Name: I Mayne-Mann Name: N Time Name: I M Tekky
Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 51 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 22 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 60
Mobile: 00 56 768 60 60 60 Mobile: 00 56 768 50 40 30 Mobile: 00 56 768 60 60 70
E-mail: mayne-mannI@ABC.com E-mail: TimeN@ABC.com E-mail: TekkyI@ABC.com
Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56
Job Title: Head Office Senior Manager Job Title: Production Scheduling Leader Job Title: IT Manager

Production Manager Logistics Manager Logistics Contact 24h


Name: M Manf Name: N Logis Name: N Logis
Telephone: 00 56 845 45 54 15 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 54 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 54
Mobile: 00 56 768 06 06 06 Mobile: 00 56 768 12 34 44 Mobile: 00 56 768 12 34 44
E-mail: ManfM@ABC.com E-mail: LogisN@ABC.com E-mail: LogisN@ABC.com
Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56
Job Title: Manufact. Plant Senior Manager Job Title: Logistics Director Job Title: Logistics Director

Manufacturing Quality Manager Manufacturing Quality Contact Manufacturing Quality Contact 24h
Name: J Jung Name: F March Name: F March
Telephone: 00 56 845 45 58 88 Telephone: 00 56 845 45 58 89 Telephone: 00 56 845 45 58 89
Mobile: 00 56 768 06 05 04 Mobile: 00 56 768 06 05 00 Mobile: 00 56 768 06 05 00
E-mail: JungJ@ABC.com E-mail: MarchF@ABC.com E-mail: MarchF@ABC.com
Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56
Job Title: Manufact. Quality Senior Manager Job Title: Manufact. Quality Team Leader Job Title: Manufact. Quality Team Leader

Inspection Contact Lab / Trials Contact Safety and Regulation Contact


Name: I Hawkeye Name: B Note Name: N Sinc
Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 55 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 30 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 57
Mobile: 00 56 768 60 60 65 Mobile: 00 56 768 60 33 20 Mobile: 00 56 768 60 60 67
E-mail: HawkeyeI@ABC.com E-mail: NoteB@ABC.com E-mail: SincN@ABC.com
Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56
Job Title: Inspection Supervisor Job Title: Testing Facilities Leader Job Title: Design Manager

Supplier ANPQP Representative (S.A.R)


Name: Ch Kleen Name: Name:
Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 34 Telephone: Telephone:
Mobile: 00 56 768 60 33 21 Mobile: Mobile:
E-mail: KleenCh@ABC.com E-mail: E-mail:
Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: Fax:
Job Title: ANPQP Facilitator Job Title: Job Title:

Name: Name: Name:


Telephone: Telephone: Telephone:
Mobile: Mobile: Mobile:
E-mail: E-mail: E-mail:
Fax: Fax: Fax:
Job Title: Job Title: Job Title:

Provided by: M Manf Signature: MMNF

Position: Manufacturing Plant Senior Manager Date: 2012/2/15

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


3.2 Project Planning and Production Preparation Monitoring

Activity Purpose:

 Plan the project activities in line with Renault-Nissan milestones and monitor the progress.

Note(s):

 The tier 1 supplier shall deploy all Project Planning and Production Preparation Monitoring requirements to all sub-suppliers (including in-house
sub-suppliers).
 There are several sheets on Production Capacity Plan (PCP) format file and the tier 1 supplier shall submit the Cover Sheet in Phase 2. The other
sheets shall be prepared and submitted upon Renault-Nissan requirement.

Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity Plan and monitor the required ANPQP activities.
Content Ensure targets for each activity and milestones are included in the plans.
Create the initial plans as Finalize and submit Update the plans if necessary. Review and update the
required. required plans. Monitor progress to plans and report status plan as required.
Output Supplier Master Schedule (SMS)
Document
Supplier Production Preparation Monitoring Plan / Status Report (SPPMP/SR)
Capacity Submission
Warrant (CSW) (Renault)
Production Capacity Plan (PCP)

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number:

 7.1 Planning of product realization


 7.2 Customer related process
 7.3 Design and development
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
 7.4 Purchasing
 7.5 Production and service provision
 7.6 Control of monitoring and measuring devices

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Supplier Master Schedule (SMS)

Key Point(s):

 The Supplier Master Schedule (inc. details) is a document that:


 Demonstrates how the timing for key design, development and production preparation milestones will support the achievement of
QCD targets
 Monitors overall project timing during supplier internal project meetings

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The document shall include:


 All key milestones for the Renault/Nissan project.
 All key milestones for the part being developed. These shall be in line with the Renault/Nissan project milestones
 Supplier internal project review meeting timing
 Detail design / drawing preparation timing
 Testing timing
 Analysis of Design and Process Potential Failures and Effects timing
 Production tooling development timing
 Production gauging development timing
 Production facilities (Inc. test) installation timing
 Control Plan development timing
 Floor plan layout / process flowchart development timing
 Operation sheets / work instructions development timing
 Operator recruitment and training timing
 Capability study timing
 Packaging development and manufacture timing
 Logistics systems implementation timing
 Sub-supplier Management activities timing
 Appearance approval timing
 Parts manufacture and submission timing
 Supplier process audit timing
 PSW sign-off timing
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
 Ramp-up activities timing
 Details sheets should be attached where necessary to provide detailed timing for individual activities e.g. tooling schedule, facility
installation & commissioning schedule etc

Output Document Description

Item Completion Instructions


Renault or Nissan Vehicle / Power train project code and location for which the part is being
R / N Project
developed / manufactured.
Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed / manufactured.
Renault - CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Document Reference No./ Version The Suppliers reference no. and version no. for the document.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name Supplier Company name.
Location at which the product will be produced.
Note:
Supplier Plant If the site supplying off-tool parts for a trial build is different to those supplying off-process parts for
a later trial, this should be discussed with Renault/Nissan and should be reflected in all project
management documentation.
Supplier Code Unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault/Nissan Purchasing Dept.
Author The name of the person who created / revised the document.
E-mail The E-mail address of the person who created / revised the document.
Tel No The telephone number of the person who created / revised the document.
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing.
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Part No. & Issue Level As issued by Renault/Nissan design department.
Design Note No. / DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed / manufactured.
Global Part Mark this box if the part is defined as a global supply part. Ask your contact if in doubt.
RKD Part Mark this box if the part is RKD (Reverse Knock Down), which is delivered from overseas.
Trial (x5) These five boxes should designate the trials for which parts will be required.

These five boxes are to show the date that parts for each specified trial are to be delivered. The
Delivery Date (x5)
delivery dates are given by Renault/Nissan to the supplier.

In case of the part to be delivered to ILN (International Logistic Network), delivery date for ILN to
ILN Delivery Date (if applicable)
be shown.

Quantity (x5) These five boxes are to show the quantity of parts for each specified trial.
Plant SOP Date (Renault/Nissan) This is the date that production will commence at the relevant Renault/Nissan plant.
This figure represents the annual volume assuming that the maximum monthly requirement for
the year was required in every month.
Planned Maximum Annualized Production
E.g. annual volume could be 350,000 units, but with a peak monthly requirement of 35,000 units,
Build
the maximum annualized production volume would be 411,250 units (based on 20 days /month
and 235 days/ year).
Identify year and months that the timing plan covers. Timing for each element should be shown
Time Scale using a time-scale in months (maximum) to cover the whole of the project life and with reference
to the standard set of symbols.
Enter the Renault/Nissan project milestone names.
Item examples to be planned timing for:
 Trial and SOP (Start Of Production) of Renault/Nissan
Project Milestones
 Project kick-off meeting held by Renault/Nissan
 Delivery of trial parts to Renault/Nissan
 Design data freeze and release

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Timing of suppliers internal cross-functional project review meetings.
The purpose of these meetings is to confirm progress status to the Master timing / detail
action plans and make countermeasure plans for project delays and major risks.
Item examples to be planned timing for:
 Review meeting of production preparation progress
Internal Project Review Meetings
 Preparation and submission of supplier master schedule
 Shipment decision meeting at each trial
 SOP(Start Of Production) judgment meeting
 Judgment meeting of shipment for mass production
 Judgment meeting of Ramp-up activity completion
Initial design development period and timing for study of Basic Specification, Product
Specification and Drawing preparation/submission for approval.
Item examples to be planned timing for:
 Study of basic specifications
Detail Design/Drawing Preparation
 Receipt of RDS / NDS (Nissan Design Standard)
 Receipt of the spec tender from Renault/Nissan
 Bill of Material (BOM) preparation
 Realization and submission of drawings
Timing for testing as identified on Supplier Test Reports and Design Assurance Plan from
Specification Tenders /NDS and Renault/Nissan Design meetings.
Note: Open test issues should be reported at all Renault/Nissan review meetings. If open
items remain unresolved by the first Renault/Nissan production trial Material Receiving
Date (MRD) timing, concessions must be formally requested.
Item examples to be planned timing for:
 Study of product quality and product reliability target
Testing
 Study of test items to be implemented
 Decision of place for testing and test equipment
 Order and receipt of off-tool parts
 Test of off-tool parts
 Order and receipt of off-process parts
 Test of off-process parts
 Result review meeting of off-tool and off-process parts test

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Timing for conducting / completion of Design and Process Potential Failure & Effects
Analysis (Design FMEA). Historical Recurrence Prevention data from Warranty and
Customer Build concerns shall be reviewed as part of this planned activity.
Analysis of Failure and Effects Item examples to be planned timing for
 Design FMEA
 Submission schedule to Renault/Nissan
 Revision of Design FMEA
Describe the preparation schedule for the completion of the design, manufacture,
inspection & buy off of all tooling including additional tool sets and multi-cavity dies. The
schedule shall also include the date of tooling design reviews and trials.
Specify the production place of tool/ die (maker name and country name) and trial place.
Item examples to be planned timing for:
 Clarifying all tooling to be prepared based on Bill of Material (BOM)
 Material decision for tooling
 Process Design Review (DR)
Production Tooling
 Tooling DR
 Tool supplier evaluation and sourcing
 Tool design
 Order to tool supplier
 Tooling fabrication
 Trial at tooling supplier and modification after trial
 Transfer from tooling supplier to production plant
 Trial at production plant and modification after trial
Describe the preparation schedule for the completion of the design, manufacture and
inspection & buy off for all gauges including additional gauges.
Specify the product location of gauge (supplier name and country name).
Item examples to be planned timing for:
Production Gauging  Preparation of gauge list based on BOM
 Gauge DR
 Selection and decision of gauge maker
 Preparation of gauge specification sheet and gauge drawing
 Submission of gauge specification sheet

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
 Gauge fabrication
 Confirmation of gauge precision and modification.
 Submission of gauge approval sheet
 Transfer from gauge supplier to production plant
Overview timing of all facilities including, modifications, installation and commissioning at
final manufacturing site. Timing details should show schedule from facility design through
to facility commissioning. Ensure historical concerns are reviewed and countermeasures
built into the activities.
Item examples to be planned timing for:
 Study of facilities based on production capacity and existing facilities
 Decision of all facilities
Production Facilities (inc. Test) Installation  Study of new facilities installation
 Completion of new facilities specification
 Purchasing order
 Fabrication of facilities
 Transfer from facilities supplier to manufacturing site and installation
 Study of facilities conditions.
 Trial and modification
 Decision of facilities conditions
Timing for deployment of all Design and Process Failure & Effects Analysis items into the
development of the pre-production and production control plans and submission /
approval of document. Renault/Nissan requirement items are as per the DCI for this
Control Plan document. Item examples to be planned timing for:
 Preparation of pre-production and production control plan
 Verification and modification of pre-production and production control plan
 Submission of pre-production and production control plan
Overview timing for proposed shop floor layout / process flow. Renault/Nissan
requirement items are as per the DCI for this document. Timing details should show
schedule from Process design through to document completion. Ensure historical
Floor Plan Layout/ Process Flowchart
concerns are reviewed and countermeasures built into the activities
Item examples to be planned timing for:
 Process design
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
 Design and design completion of floor layout
 Purchasing order and installation of necessary goods
 Delivery and delivery completion of equipment
 Completion of production process, shipment area
 Trial and modification of floor layout
Timing for initial preparation of work instructions and planned updates based on the
results of pre-production trials. Item examples to be planned timing for:
Operation Sheets / Work Instructions
 Preparation of work instructions for pre-production and production
 Updates of work instructions after trial
Timing of recruitment and training activities for trial builds through to Start of production
(SOP) requirements. Note: Show how recruitment and training support the planned trial
builds. Item examples to be planned timing for:
 Study of operators recruitment and training plan
Operator Recruitment & Training
 Operator training for each trial
 Re-training after trial
 Recruitment of new operators
 Confirmation of proficiency level
Timing for study plan, evaluation and submission of capability data from off tool
throughout supplier internal trials, concluding with data submission to Renault/Nissan.
Note: Renault/Nissan may ask for development capability data for specific parts and
Capability Study projects. Item examples to be planned timing for:
 Preparation and submission of process capability study plan
 Evaluation of process capability
 Submission of process capability result
Timing for specification, submission and approval of packaging specification, including
timing for trial evaluation and procurement of packaging. Timing should support
production trials using final packaging specification where agreed with Renault/Nissan.
Packaging Development and Manufacture Item examples to be planned timing for:
 Study and decision of packaging specification
 Selection and decision of packaging maker
 Reception of packaging sample and confirmation

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
 Submission of packaging specification sheet for trial
 Packaging trial
 Preparation of packaging specification sheet
 Final packaging trial
 Submission of final packaging specifications
 Approval by Renault/Nissan
Timing for specification, submission and approval of Logistics data, including timing for
Logistics Systems Implementation
installation / testing of any electronic data interchange systems.
Timing for Sub-supplier activities (including Imposed / Module suppliers) from
Sub-supplier selection through to sub-component part approval / PSW submission, with
supporting sub-component assurance documents.
Item examples to be planned timing for:
 Decision of sub suppliers
Sub-Supplier Management
 Submission of Component Supply Chain Chart (CSCC) to Renault/Nissan
 Evaluation of off tool trial parts
 Sub suppliers audit
 Evaluation of off process trial parts
 Sub supplier ramp up activity
Timing for specification, confirmation, evaluation, reiteration activities, and final
submission of reports and master samples or plaques. Item examples to be planned
timing for:
 Confirmation meeting of appearance approval
Appearance Approval
 Submission of application for appearance approval
 Tuning
 Final quality confirmation meeting
 Submission of appearance approval report
Timing from start to finish of each internal supplier trial build, any reiteration/ feedback
activities and trial builds that are supporting submission of parts to Renault/Nissan. Note:
Parts Manufacture & Submission Suppliers should liaise with Renault/Nissan to confirm Body / Vehicle MRD requirements
and timings. Item examples to be planned timing for:
 Bill of Material (BOM) preparation

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
 Study and decision of inspection standard
 Production of each trial
 Inspection of each trial
 Modification and inspection after inspection by trial
 Supplier Start of Production (SOP)
Timing for the supplier to validate both his own and sub-suppliers process under Start of
Supplier Process Audit
Production (SOP) conditions.
Timing for issue of supplier signed-off Parts Submission Warrant (PSW) to
PSW Sign-off
Renault/Nissan. Confirm submission timing with Renault/Nissan.
Ramp up activities Timing for the planning, commencement and duration of the ramp up activities.
Responsible Person (Supplier) Name of the person responsible at the supplier for the activity.
Comments Include any comments relevant to the content of the master schedule or details sheets.
Each area with a major involvement in the project will be expected to sign-off the Supplier
Supplier Sign-off (Manager Level) Master Schedule at a senior level to confirm agreement of all areas to the content of the
document.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Example to develop as a Summary

Part Type Global Part RKD Part


ANPQP - SUPPLIER MASTER SCHEDULE (SMS) (inc. Details)

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
X46 Doc. Rev. Date:
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: Dec 1st 2010
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: taro@mail.nissan.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Atsugi-Plant Author: Taro Nissan Tel: +81-(0)46-270-1894
Part Name: DVC Compl - Auto Trans Cont Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 34901 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T04587

Vehicle Trial Production Delivery Delivery Delivery Delivery Delivery Annuale Production
Trial Qty Trial Qty Trial Qty Trial Qty Trial Qty SOP Date Volume Max.
Requirements Date Date Date Date Date
(Forcast information) PT Lot 2011/8/18 50 PT Lot 2 2011/10/20 100 2011/12/19 120,000

Responsible Person Time Scale


No. Project Item (Detail)
(Supplier) Jan/'11 Feb Mar Apr May Jne Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan/'12 Feb Mar Apr
Project Leader
1 Project Milestones ★ Project Kick Off ★ Design Data Release PT lot 1st PT lot 2nd
T. Nissan MRD MRD SOP
Exit Judgment
Project Leader #2 of Ramp-up activity
2 Internal Project Review Meetings #1 Judge of T0 PT lot Shipping decision Progress Shipping SOP Shipping decision
T. Nissan Progress Progress
production decision
decision meeting Confirmation decision decision meeting (Mass Production)
meeting meeting
release meeting meeting (1st PT-lot ) (1st PT lot) meeting meeting
3 Detail Design/ Drawing Preparation Design G. Kato (2nd PT-lot) Submit (Production)
Basic Spec. Study Submit data
4 Testing Quality AssuranceS. Ito Planning Test Re-Test
Engineering (Non-confirmed/Endurance items)
5 Analysis of Potential Failure and Effects Design FMEA Process FMEA
S. Eto Submit Submit
T0 Trial
Evaluate Die DR Die DR
Develop
and schedule
Engineering source die with the
Die Design Die Trial T1 T2 T3 T4
6 Production Tooling (by ABC Die company/Japan)
S. Eto supplier supplier
Confirme reccurence prevention

Mold Flow analysis Design Jig Jig Trial


Gauge study Submit Approval Request
Engineering
7 Production Gauging Submit Gauge Preparation Gauge Tuning
S. Eto Gauge Spec. (XYZ Company /PRC) Study

8 Production Facilities (inc. Test) Installation Engineering G. Eto Equipmemt Installation


Quality Assurance
9 Control Plans FB trial result
S. Ito Develop Draft FB T0 Result Re-submit (if updated)
Engineering
10 Floor Plan layout/ Process Flowchart
S. Eto Design Manufacturing Process Design Floor Plan Lay Out
11 Operation Sheets/ Work Instructions Production J. Kudo Develop Work Instruction Update Work Instruction

12 Operator Recruitment and Training Production J. Kudo(w/ Human Resource)


Develop operator hiring/training plan Operator hiring/Training

Submit data Submit data


Quality Assurance
13 Capability Study Develop Production T0 T1 PT-lot PT-lot Submit Full volume
S. Ito Submit (1st half) (2nd half) data production traial
Capability Plan Capability Study
Production Control
14 Packaging Development and Manufacture Packing Spec. Study/Evaluation
J. Sato Submit spec.
15 Logistics Systems Implementation Production Control J. Sato Study NISSAN EDI system EDI system trial
Quality Assurance
16 Sub-supplier Management
S. Ito Sub-supplier sourcing Receive Trial components Testing TierN Audit PSW Approval Ramp up activity w/ TierN supplier
Quality Assurance Quality Confirmation (Hinkaku 1) Tuning Submit Req
17 Appearance Approval Hinkaku 2
S. Ito Submit Req. Re-submit Req.
Quality Assurance
18 Parts Manufacture and Submission Hinkaku
S. Ito T0 Trial 1 T1 T2 Part shipping T3 T4 Full Volume procution Trial
19 Supplier Process Audit Quality AssuranceS. Ito Self Audit Follow-Up audit
20 PSW Sign off Quality AssuranceS. Ito Submit
Quality Assurance Develop Ramp-up activity plan
21 Ramp-up Activities
S. Ito SOP (at Supplier) Ramp-up activity

Supplier Sign-off (Manager Level)


Project Leader Purch / Sales Production Control Quality Assurance Engineering Design Production
Name T. Nissan I. Sudo Y. Sato S. Ito O. Eto G. Kato J. Kudo
Signature T. Nissan I. Sudo Y. Sato S. Ito O. Eto G. Kato J. Kudo

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Example to develop by Project Item

Part Type Global Part RKD Part


ANPQP - SUPPLIER MASTER SCHEDULE (inc. Details)

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
X46 Doc. Rev. Date:
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: Dec 1st 2010
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: taro@mail.nissan.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Atsugi-Plant Author: Taro Nissan Tel: +81-(0)46-270-1894
Part Name: DVC Compl - Auto Trans Cont Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 34901 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T04587

Vehicle Trial Production Delivery Delivery Delivery Delivery Delivery Annuale Production
Trial Qty Trial Qty Trial Qty Trial Qty Trial Qty SOP Date Volume Max.
Requirements Date Date Date Date Date
(Forcast information) PT Lot 2011/8/18 50 PT Lot 2 2011/10/20 100 2011/12/19 120,000

Responsible Person Time Scale


No. Project Item (Detail)
(Supplier) Jan/'11 Feb Mar Apr May Jne Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan/'12 Feb Mar Apr
Project Leader
1 Project Milestones ★ Project Kick Off ★ Design Data Release PT lot 1st PT lot 2nd
T. Nissan MRD MRD SOP
Exit Judgment
Project Leader #2 of Ramp-up activity
2 Internal Project Review Meetings #1 Judge of T0 PT lot Shipping decision Progress Shipping SOP Shipping decision
T. Nissan Progress Progress
production decision
decision meeting Confirmation decision decision meeting (Mass Production)
meeting meeting
release meeting meeting (1st PT-lot ) (1st PT lot) meeting meeting
3 Detail Design/ Drawing Preparation Design G. Kato (2nd PT-lot) Submit (Production)
Basic Spec. Study Submit data
4 Testing Quality AssuranceS. Ito Planning Test Re-Test
Engineering (Non-confirmed/Endurance items)
5 Analysis of Potential Failure and Effects Design FMEA Process FMEA
G. Eto Submit Submit
T0 Trial
Evaluate Die DR Die DR
Develop
and schedule
Engineering source die with the
Die Design Die Trial T1 T2 T3 T4
6 Production Tooling (by ABC Die company/Japan)
G. Eto supplier supplier
Confirme reccurence prevention

Mold Flow analysis Design Jig Jig Trial


Gauge study Submit Approval Request
Engineering
7 Production Gauging Submit Gauge Preparation Gauge Gauge
G. Eto Gauge Spec. (XYZ Company /PRC) Study correction

8 Production Facilities (inc. Test) Installation Engineering G. Eto Equipmemt Installation Issue TPM planning
Quality Assurance
9 Control Plans FB trial result
S. Ito Develop Draft FB T0 Result Re-submit (if updated)
Engineering
10 Floor Plan layout/ Process Flowchart
S. Eto Design Manufacturing Process Design Floor Plan Lay Out
11 Operation Sheets/ Work Instructions Production J. Kudo Develop Work Instruction Update Work Instruction

12 Operator Recruitment and Training Production J. Kudo(w/ Human Resource)


Develop operator hiring/training plan Operator hiring/Training

Submit data Submit data


Quality Assurance
13 Capability Study Develop Production T0 T1 PT-lot PT-lot Submit Full volume
S. Ito Submit (1st half) (2nd half) data production traial
Capability Plan Capability Study
Production Control
14 Packaging Development and Manufacture Packing Spec. Study/Evaluation
J. Sato Submit spec.
15 Logistics Systems Implementation Production Control J. Sato Study NISSAN EDI system EDI system trial
Quality Assurance
16 Sub-supplier Management
S. Ito Sub-supplier sourcing Receive Trial components Testing TierN Audit PSW Approval Ramp up activity w/ TierN supplier
Quality Assurance Quality Confirmation (Hinkaku 1) Tuning Submit Req
17 Appearance Approval Hinkaku 2
S. Ito Submit Req. Re-submit Req.
Quality Assurance
18 Parts Manufacture and Submission Hinkaku
S. Ito T0 Trial 1 T1 T2 Part shipping T3 T4 Full Volume procution Trial
19 Supplier Process Audit Quality AssuranceS. Ito Self Audit Follow-Up audit
20 PSW Sign off Quality AssuranceS. Ito Submit
Quality Assurance Develop Ramp-up activity plan
21 Ramp-up Activities
S. Ito SOP (at Supplier) Ramp-up activity

Supplier Sign-off (Manager Level)


Project Leader Purch / Sales Production Control Quality Assurance Engineering Design Production
Name T. Nissan I. Sudo Y. Sato S. Ito O. Eto G. Kato J. Kudo
Signature T. Nissan I. Sudo Y. Sato S. Ito O. Eto G. Kato J. Kudo

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Detail Page Example

Global Part RKD Part


ANPQP - SUPPLIER MASTER SCHEDULE (inc. Details) Objective Internal Project Review Meetings Part Type

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
X46 Doc. Rev. Date:
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: Dec 1st 2010
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: taro@mail.nissan.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Atsugi-Plant Author: Taro Nissan Tel: +81-(0)46-270-1894
Part Name: DVC Compl - Auto Trans Cont Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 34901 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T04587

Vehicle Trial Production Delivery Delivery Delivery Delivery Delivery


Trial Qty Trial Qty Trial Qty Trial Qty Trial Qty SOP Date Annuale Production Volume Max.
Requirements Date Date Date Date Date
(Forcast information)
PT Lot 2011/8/18 50 PT Lot 2 2011/10/20 100 2011/12/19 120,000

Responsible Person Time Scale


No. Project Item (Detail)
(Supplier) Jan/'11 Feb Mar Apr May Jne Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan/'12 Feb Mar Apr
Project Leader ★ Design Data Release PT lot 1st PT lot 2nd
1 Project Milestones ★ Project Kick Off
T. Nissan MRD MRD SOP
2 #1 Development Progress Meeting (Same as above)
3 #2 Development Progress Meeting (Same as above)
4 Judgement of Production Release (Same as above)
5 T0 Decision Meeting (Same as above)
6 PT Lot Decision Meeting (Same as above)
7 Shipping Decision Meeting (PT Lot 1st) (Same as above)
8 Progress Confirmation (PT Lot 1st) (Same as above)
9 Shipping Decision Meeting (PT Lot 2nd) (Same as above)
10 SOP Decision Meeting (Same as above)
11 Shipping Decision Meeting (Mass Prod.) (Same as above)
Weekly
12 Progress Confirmation of Ramp-up Activity (Same as above)
13 Exit Judgement of Ramp-up Activity (Same as above)
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Supplier Sign-off (Manager Level)


Project Leader Purch / Sales Production Control Quality Assurance Engineering Design Production
Name T. Nissan I. Sudo Y. Sato S. Ito S. Eto G. Kato J. Kudo
Signature T. Nissan I. Sudo Y. Sato T. Ito S. Eto G. Kato J. Kudo

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Detail Page Example

Global Part RKD Part


ANPQP - SUPPLIER MASTER SCHEDULE (inc. Details) Objective Detail Design/ Drawing Preparation Part Type

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
X46 Doc. Rev. Date:
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: Dec 1st 2010
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: taro@mail.nissan.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Atsugi-Plant Author: Taro Nissan Tel: +81-(0)46-270-1894
Part Name: DVC Compl - Auto Trans Cont Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 34901 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T04587

Vehicle Trial Production Delivery Delivery Delivery Delivery Delivery Annuale Production
Trial Qty Trial Qty Trial Qty Trial Qty Trial Qty SOP Date
Requirements Date Date Date Date Date Volume Max.
(Forcast information) PT Lot 2011/8/18 50 PT Lot 2 2011/10/20 100 2011/12/19 120,000

Responsible Person Time Scale


No. Project Item (Detail)
(Supplier) Jan/'11 Feb Mar Apr May Jne Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan/'12 Feb Mar Apr
Project Leader PT lot 1st PT lot 2nd
1 Project Milestones ★ Project Kick Off ★ Design Data Release
T. Nissan MRD MRD SOP
2 Internal Project Review Meetings (Same as above)
3 Basic Spec Study G. Kato
4 Design Proposal Drawings (Same as above)
5 Submit Proposal Drawings (Same as above)
6 Get Approval for Proposal Drawings (Same as above)
7 Design detail CAD data (Same as above)
8 Submission of detail CAD data (Same as above)
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 Skip the rest example
20
21

Supplier Sign-off (Manager Level)


Project Leader Purch / Sales Production Control Quality Assurance Engineering Design Production
Name T. Nissan I. Sudo Y. Sato S. Ito S. Eto G. Kato J. Kudo
Signature T. Nissan I. Sudo Y. Sato T. Ito S. Eto G. Kato J. Kudo

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Supplier Production Preparation Monitoring Plan/Status Report (SPPM/SR)

Key Point(s):

 The Supplier Production Preparation Monitoring Plan / Status Report is a document that is used to establish the targets for the 4M
(Man, Material, Machine, Method) at each stage of the project and to report the achievement of these targets at each milestone.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The supplier shall complete a Supplier Production Preparation Monitoring Plan/Status Report for each part or part family/group. This
document should identify the targets set and results achieved by the supplier for each Renault/ Nissan project milestone.
 All targets shall be expressed as a percentage of required Start of Production (SOP) condition.
 For Renault minimum timing requirements to achieve these targets, see company specific requirements.
Note: For Renault, the Full Volume Conditions are at the end of ramp-up.

Output Document Description

Item Completion Instructions


R / N Project Renault or Nissan Vehicle / Power train project for which the product is being developed / manufactured.
Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed / manufactured.
Renault - CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Document Reference No./ Version The Suppliers reference no. and version no. for the document.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name Supplier Company name.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Location at which the product will be produced.
Note: If the site supplying off-tool parts for a trial build is different to that supplying off-process parts for a
Supplier Plant
later trial, this should be discussed with Renault / Nissan and should be reflected in all project management
documentation.

Supplier Code Unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault / Nissan Purchasing Dept.
Author The name of the person who created / revised the document.
E-mail The E-mail address of the person who created / revised the document.
Tel No The telephone number of the person who created / revised the document.
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing.
Part No. & Issue Level As issued by Renault / Nissan design department.
Design Note No. / DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed / manufactured.
Milestone Enter the Renault/ Nissan project milestone name.
M Indicate the planned total number of personnel (including all shifts) who will manufacture the product at each
A Planned Target
milestone
N
% of Personnel at Full
Indicate the above plan as a percentage of the personnel required at full volume condition
Volume Condition
Manning Requirement
Achievement Indicate the actual number of personnel used to manufacture the product at each milestone
% of Planned Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the planned target
% of Full Volume Condition Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the full volume condition
Skill Level Planned Target Indicate the planned number of fully trained personnel who will manufacture the product at each milestone

% of Personnel at Full
Indicate the above plan as a percentage of the personnel required at full volume condition
Volume Condition

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Achievement Indicate the actual number of fully trained personnel who manufactured the product at each milestone
% of Planned Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the planned target
% of Full Volume Condition Indicate the above achievement as a of the full volume condition
M Test Achievement Indicate the planned number of successfully completed tests (design verification & product/process
A Planned Target
validation) by the Supplier at each milestone.
T
E Indicate the above plan as a percentage of the total number of tests shown on the Supplier Test Plan and
R % of Supplier Test Plan
Report documents for Design Verification & Product/Process Validation.
I
A Achievement Indicate the actual number of successfully completed tests at each milestone
L
% of Planned Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the planned target
% of SOP Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the SOP target
Process Capability Indicate the planned number of features, as shown on the Process Capability Study Plan, which will be
Planned Target capable at each milestone.
For Renault refer to the Renault Standard 00-10-415.

% of Process Capability
Indicate the above plan as a percentage of features shown on the Process Capability Study Plan.
Study Plan

Indicate the actual number of features, as shown on the Process Capability Study Plan, that were capable at
Achievement
each milestone

% of Planned Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the planned target
% of SOP Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the SOP target
Straight Through Ratio Planned Target Indicate the planned percentage of good product manufactured without rework at each milestone
% of SOP Target Indicate the above plan as a percentage of the SOP target
Achievement Indicate the actual percentage of good product manufactured without rework at each milestone

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
% of Planned Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the planned target
% of SOP Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the SOP target
Planned Target Indicate the planned percentage of OK product, including rework, manufactured at each milestone.
% of SOP Target Indicate the above plan as a percentage of the SOP target
OK Ratio Achievement Indicate the actual percentage of OK product, including rework, manufactured at each milestone.
% of Planned Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the planned target
% of SOP Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the SOP target
Planned Target Indicate the planned number of sub-components fully approved at each milestone.

% of Components Indicate the above plan as a percentage of the total number of sub-components to be fully approved before
Approved by SOP SOP
Approval of
Sub-components Achievement Indicate the actual number of sub-components fully approved at each milestone
% of Planned Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the planned target
% of SOP Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the SOP target
Planned Target Indicate the planned number of parts with graining approval at each milestone.
% of SOP Target Indicate the above plan as a percentage of the total number required for SOP.
Part Graining Achievement Indicate the actual number of parts with graining approval at each milestone
% of Planned Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the planned target
% of SOP Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the SOP target
Part Marking for Mass Indicate the planned number of parts with mass production marking at each milestone.
Production Note:
Planned Target
Component marking includes any marking that is made on the product to aid identification of the product.
Typically this includes part number, Renault/ Nissan symbol, Material type, traceability identification. For

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Renault refer to the Renault Standard 00-10-415.
% of SOP Target Indicate the above plan as percentage of the total number required for SOP.
Achievement Indicate the actual number of parts with mass production marking at each milestone
% of Planned Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the planned target
% of SOP Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the SOP target
M Planned Target Indicate the planned number of tools to be completed at each milestone.
A
% Planned at Full Volume
C Indicate the above plan as a percentage of the total number of tools required at full volume condition.
Condition
H Production Tooling
I Completion Achievement Indicate the actual number of tools completed at each milestone
N
E % of Planned Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the planned target
% of Full Volume Condition Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the full volume condition
Production Gauging Indicate the planned number of gauges to be completed at each milestone.
Completion Note:
Planned Target
Review Renault / Nissan Gauge timing requirements prior to completion of the Supplier Production
Preparation Monitoring Plan / Status Report.
% Planned at Full Volume
Indicate the above plan as a percentage of the total number of gauges required at full volume condition
Condition
Achievement Indicate the actual number of gauges completed at each milestone
% of Planned Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the planned target
% of Full Volume Condition Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the full volume condition
Facilities Indicate the planned number of facilities identified on the Floor Plan Layout document, which are to be
Planned Target
Commissioned modified/introduced/ commissioned in their final location at each milestone.
(including test)
% Planned at Full Volume
Indicate the above plan as a percentage of the total number of facilities required at full volume condition.
Condition

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Indicate the actual number of facilities modified/ introduced/ commissioned in their final location at each
Achievement
milestone.
% of Planned Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the planned target
% of Full Volume Condition Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the full volume condition
Production Cycle Time Planned Target Indicate the planned cycle time to be achieved at each milestone.
Achievement
% Planned at Full Volume
Indicate the above plan as a percentage of the cycle time required to support planned annual volume.
Condition
Achievement Indicate the actual cycle time achieved at each milestone.
% of Planned Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the planned target
% of Full Volume Condition Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the full volume condition
M Packaging Availability Planned Target Indicate the planned quantity of packaging (internal and external) to be available at each milestone
E
% of SOP Target Indicate the above plan as a percentage of the total quantity required for SOP.
T
H Achievement Indicate the actual quantity of packaging (internal and external) available at each milestone
O
D % of Planned Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the planned target
% of SOP Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the SOP target
Work Instructions Planned Target Indicate the planned number of operation sheets to be completed at each milestone.
% Planned at Full Volume
Indicate the above plan as a percentage of the total number required at full volume condition.
Condition
Achievement Indicate the actual number of operation sheets completed for at each milestone.
% of Planned Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the planned target
% of Full Volume Condition Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the full volume condition
Average Score Indicate the average of the percentage results for the planned targets at each milestone
Supplier Sign-off Each area with a major involvement in the project will be expected to sign-off this document at a senior level to confirm the agreement of

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
all areas to the content of the document.
For guidance in sign-off at the supplier, responsibility is intended to be
• Project Leader - the agreed window within the supplier for the project.
• Purchasing/Sales - responsibilities may include direct and indirect materials ordering.
• Production Control - responsibilities may include sales administration, production scheduling, parts ordering, inventory control.
• QA - responsibilities may include customer quality concerns, supplier quality assurance and in-house quality assurance.
• Engineering - responsibilities may include tooling specifications, production line layout, and process control.
• Design - responsibilities may include drawing release, design change control.p>
• Production - responsibility for all aspects of production.
The relevant name should be clearly printed with signature below.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
ANPQP - SUPPLIER PRODUCTION PREPARATION MONITORING PLAN AND STATUS REPORT

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc. Ref. No./Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
X78 Doc Rev. Date: -
A B C OBD 2
R Doc. Origin Date: 2011/1/31
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: pleasder@abc.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Barcelona Author: P Leader Tel: +44 7895 156 456
Part Name: Widget A Milestone: Plan
Part No. & Issue Level: 12345 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T0F789

Project Milestones
Production Preparation Influencing Factors (All numbers below are cumulative numbers) Comments
S-Lot PT1 PT2 SOP
Planned Target 0 2 2 2
% of Personnel at Full Volume Condition 0% 100% 100% 100%
Manning Number of
Achievement
Requirement Personnel
% of Planned Target
M
% of Full Volume Condition
A
Planned Target 0 1 2 2
N
Number of % of Personnel at Full Volume Condition 0% 50% 100% 100%
Skill Level Personnel Fully Achievement
Trained % of Planned Target
% of Full Volume Condition
Planned Target 2 8 8 8
% of Supplier Test Plan 25% 100% 100% 100%
Test Number of Tests
Achievement
Achievement Passed
% of Planned Target
% of SOP Target
Planned Target 0 5 5 5
% of Process Capability Study Plan 0% 100% 100% 100%
Process Number of
Achievement
Capability Features Capable
% of Planned Target
% of SOP Target
Planned Target - 92% 98% 98%
Straight % of SOP Target - 94% 100% 100%
% of Product
Through Achievement
Straight Through
M Ratio % of Planned Target
A % of SOP Target
T
Planned Target - 94% 98% 100%
% of SOP Target - 94% 98% 100%
E % of OK Product
OK Ratio Achievement
R (Including Rework)
% of Planned Target
I
% of SOP Target
K A Planned Target 0 1 1 1
E L Approval of Number of Sub- % of Components approved by SOP 0% 100% 100% 100%
Y Sub- components fully Achievement
components approved % of Planned Target
M % of SOP Target
E Planned Target 0 1 1 1
A Number of % of SOP Target 0% 100% 100% 100%
S Part Graining Components with Achievement
U Graining Approval % of Planned Target
R % of SOP Target
A Planned Target 0 2 2 2
Number of
B Part Marking % of SOP Target 0% 100% 100% 100%
Components with
L for Mass Achievement
Mass Production
E Production % of Planned Target
Marking
S % of SOP Target
Planned Target 2 2 2 2
Production Number of % Planned at Full Volume Condition 100% 100% 100% 100%
Tooling Production Tools Achievement
Completion Complete % of Planned Target
% of Full Volume Condition
Planned Target 2 2 2 2
M Production % Planned at Full Volume Condition 100% 100% 100% 100%
Number of Gauges
Gauging Achievement
A Complete
Completion % of Planned Target
C
% of Full Volume Condition
H
Planned Target 0 2 2 2
I Number of
Facilities % Planned at Full Volume Condition 0% 100% 100% 100%
N Facilities
Commission Achievement
E Commissioned in
ed % of Planned Target
Final Location
% of Full Volume Condition
Planned Target - 0.15 0.15 0.15
Production % Planned at Full Volume Condition - 100% 100% 100%
Cycle Time
Cycle Time Achievement
Achievement
Achievement % of Planned Target
% of Full Volume Condition
Planned Target 5 10 50 100
Quantity of % Planned at Full Volume Condition 5% 10% 50% 100%
M Packaging Packaging Achievement
Availability
E Available % of Planned Target
T % of SOP Target
H Planned Target 1 1 2 2
O Number of Work % of SOP Target 50% 50% 100% 100%
Work
D Instructions Instructions Achievement
Complete % of Planned Target
% of Full Volume Condition
Average Score

Project Leader Purch / Sales Production Control QA Engineering Design Production


Name P Leader N E Body A N Other P Smithe A Jones S O Else N E One
Signature P Leader N E Body A N Other P Smithe A Jones S O Else N E One

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


ANPQP - SUPPLIER PRODUCTION PREPARATION MONITORING PLAN AND STATUS REPORT

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc. Ref. No./Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
X78 Doc Rev. Date: 2011/2/28
A B C OBD 2
R Doc. Origin Date: 2011/1/31
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: pleasder@abc.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Barcelona Author: P Leader Tel: +44 7895 156 456
Part Name: Widget A Milestone: PT1 Status Report
Part No. & Issue Level: 12345 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T0F789

Project Milestones
Production Preparation Influencing Factors (All numbers below are cumulative numbers) Comments
S-Lot PT1 PT2 SOP
Planned Target 0 2 2 2
% of Personnel at Full Volume Condition 0% 100% 100% 100%
Manning Number of
Achievement 0 1 Person not in place, starts wk 10
Requirement Personnel
M
% of Planned Target 100% 50%
% of Full Volume Condition 0% 50%
A
Planned Target 0 1 2 2
N
Number of % of Personnel at Full Volume Condition 0% 50% 100% 100%
Skill Level Personnel Fully Achievement 0 1
Trained % of Planned Target 100% 100%
% of Full Volume Condition 0% 50%
Planned Target 2 8 8 8
% of Supplier Test Plan 25% 100% 100% 100%
Test Number of Tests
Achievement 2 6 Re-testing, results wk 15
Achievement Passed
% of Planned Target 100% 75%
% of SOP Target 25% 75%
Planned Target 0 5 5 5
% of Process Capability Study Plan 0% 100% 100% 100%
Process Number of Tool modification pending,
Achievement 0 4
Capability Features Capable Completion wk 14
% of Planned Target 100% 80%
% of SOP Target 0% 80%
Planned Target - 92% 98% 98%
Straight % of SOP Target - 94% 100% 100%
% of Product
Through Achievement - 90%
Straight Through
M Ratio % of Planned Target - 98%
A % of SOP Target - 92%
T
Planned Target - 94% 98% 100%
% of SOP Target - 94% 98% 100%
E % of OK Product
OK Ratio Achievement - 93%
R (Including Rework)
% of Planned Target - 99%
I
% of SOP Target - 93%
K A Planned Target 0 1 1 1
E L Approval of Number of Sub- % of Components approved by SOP 0% 100% 100% 100%
Y Sub- components fully Achievement 0 1
components approved % of Planned Target 100% 100%
M % of SOP Target 0% 100%
E Planned Target 0 1 1 1
A Number of % of SOP Target 0% 100% 100% 100%
Awaiting judgement by
S Part Graining Components with Achievement 0 0
customer
U Graining Approval % of Planned Target 100% 0%
R % of SOP Target 0% 0%
A Planned Target 0 2 2 2
Number of
B Part Marking % of SOP Target 0% 100% 100% 100%
Components with
L for Mass Achievement 0 2
Mass Production
E Production % of Planned Target 100% 100%
Marking
S % of SOP Target 0% 100%
Planned Target 2 2 2 2
Production Number of % Planned at Full Volume Condition 100% 100% 100% 100%
Tooling Production Tools Achievement 2 2
Completion Complete % of Planned Target 100% 100%
% of Full Volume Condition 100% 100%
Planned Target 2 2 2 2
M Production % Planned at Full Volume Condition 100% 100% 100% 100%
Number of Gauges
A Gauging Achievement 2 2
Complete
C
Completion % of Planned Target 100% 100%
% of Full Volume Condition 100% 100%
H
Planned Target 0 2 2 2
I Number of
Facilities % Planned at Full Volume Condition 0% 100% 100% 100%
N Facilities
Commission Achievement 0 2
E Commissioned in
ed % of Planned Target 100% 100%
Final Location
% of Full Volume Condition 0% 100%
Planned Target - 0.15 0.15 0.15
Production % Planned at Full Volume Condition - 100% 100% 100%
Cycle Time Cycle time to be reduced by
Cycle Time Achievement - 0.25
Achievement including 3rd operator
Achievement % of Planned Target - 60%
% of Full Volume Condition - 60%
Planned Target 5 10 50 100
Quantity of % Planned at Full Volume Condition 5% 10% 50% 100%
M Packaging Packaging Achievement 5 10
Availability
E Available % of Planned Target 100% 100%
T % of SOP Target 5% 10%
H Planned Target 1 1 2 2
O Number of Work % of SOP Target 50% 50% 100% 100%
Work
D Instructions Instructions Achievement 1 1
Complete % of Planned Target 100% 100%
% of Full Volume Condition 50% 50%
Average Score 100% 84%

Project Leader Purch / Sales Production Control QA Engineering Design Production


Name P Leader N E Body A N Other P Smithe A Jones S O Else N E One
Signature P Leader N E Body A N Other P Smithe A Jones S O Else N E One

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Production Capacity Plan (PCP)

Key Point(s):

 The Production Capacity Plan (PCP) is intended to confirm that the production capacity to support Renault / Nissan requirements will be available
and not constrained by the mix of product required.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

The Supplier shall systematically define and document below:


 the process bottlenecks and their location within the overall production process
 the variant mix constraints
 a Production Capacity Plan shall be completed for each process step indicated on the Process Flow Chart.

Output Document Description:

PRODUCTION CAPACITY PLAN (PCP)


Item Completion Instructions
Renault or Nissan Vehicle / Power train project for which the product is being
R / N Project
developed / manufactured.
Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed / manufactured.
Renault - CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Document Reference No./ Version The Suppliers reference no. and version no. for the document.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name Supplier Company name.
Supplier Plant Location at which the product will be produced.
Supplier Code Unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault / Nissan Purchasing Dept.
E-mail The E-mail address of the person who created / revised the document.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Author The name of the person who created / revised the document.
Tel The telephone number of the person who created / revised the document.
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing.
Part No. & Issue Level: Part number which is issued by Renault / Nissan design department.
The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed /
Design Note No. / DEVO
manufactured.
Process stage indicator taken from the Process Flow Chart.
Operation Number Each operation could have a different number from the codification proposed by the
Supplier but it will enable to position it clearly in the process flowchart to be added.
Process operation Name of process stage taken from the Process Flow Chart.
Type of Machine / Equipment Facility used at this stage of the process, taken from the Process Flow Chart.
Name of the part produced by this operation/Ref/list of final product using
References or group of references using identical or similar production means
this Ref.
Nominal cycle time including periodic operations included in standard
Standard cycle time [sec]
(ex: boxes carrying, drill replacement,...); does not include changeover time
Sum of production quantity
Nb parts/cycle
For example: Count two when produced right and left parts in one shot.
Average operational efficiency (based on Number of parts really produced / theoretical number of parts during opening time
production results) [%] (not including scraps) mentioned later (not including scraps that will be noticed separately in next column)
This operation scrap rate [%] Number of scrap parts/ number of produced part for this operation only
Planned capacity
Sum of scrap rates from this operation and all next ones.
(ANPQP : production Cumulated Downstream scraps [%]
(If cumulated scrap rate is 10%, it will be necessary to produce 111 parts (=100/90%)
capacity plan document (this op. included)
at this operation to obtain a real capacity of 100 parts of final products for example.)
Effective capacity per hour (Automatic ticketing )
It must be the number of hours used for efficiency calculation above.
 If 1/2h of break on 8h, 7,5hours worked but the efficiency will be calculated on 7,5h
Nb hours per shift (same base as OEE
and not 8h.
calculation)
 If breaks already makes lower efficiency figure. (ex in this case the max efficiency
would be 94% (7,5/8), so 8h work hours would be counted.)
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
 If the number of hours is depending of the days, an average will be considered.
Total Weekly working time (Automatic ticketing )
Number of machines Number of machines enabling simultaneous production
Percentage of production allocated to this Machine(s) workload planned by the supplier for manufacturing this product
Renault-Nissan parts final product [%] (in the case of capacity means); equal at most to available machine capacity
Number of this product used in final product
 If 2 axes in final product, coefficient = 2 for axe machining operation for ex.
Number of part (from this operation) used per
 if coefficient = 3 in 60% of final products and coefficient = 2 in 40% of final products,
final product (coefficient)
coefficient (=3*0.6+2*0.4)=2.6.
 if this operation concerns only 40% of final products, coefficient = 0,4
Current Weekly capacity
(Automatic ticketing )
(equivalent final product)
Number of personnel Number of staff required to operate the product manufacturing facility.
Percentage of expected non-conforming material to be generated during the
Details when applicable: manufacturing process.
Scrap rates
(Percentage of expected nonconforming material to be generated during the
manufacturing process.)
Are there any constraints in the manufacturing process caused by the variant mix/
product diversity?
Variant mix constraints
 If yes, input ‘Yes’ on the form and attach a detailed explanation.
 If no, input ‘No’.
The time for any required tooling changeover for manufacture of different products in
Changeover times
the facility, quoted as a time per changeover.
Changeover frequency The frequency of any required tooling changes
% facility availability These percentages are for the facility available time for each of the categories
Tool life expectancy Life of the tooling until refurbishment or replacement will become necessary
Overall efficiency level expected from the product manufacturing facility during its total
Efficiency levels
working time.
Details when applicable: Number of personnel Number of staff required to operate the product manufacturing facility.
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Percentage of expected non-conforming material to be generated during the
Scrap rates manufacturing process. (Percentage of expected nonconforming material to be
generated during the manufacturing process.)
Are there any constraints in the manufacturing process caused by the variant mix/
product diversity?
Variant mix constraints
If yes, input ‘Yes’ on the form and attach a detailed explanation.
If no, input ‘No’.
The time for any required tooling changeover for manufacture of different products in
Changeover times
the facility, quoted as a time per changeover.
Changeover frequency The frequency of any required tooling changes
% facility availability These percentages are for the facility available time for each of the categories
Percentage of facility Tool life expectancy Life of the tooling until refurbishment or replacement will become necessary
available: Overall efficiency level expected from the product manufacturing facility during its total
Efficiency levels
working time.
Annual Capacity JPH The number of the products manufactured in 1 hour.
Completed By Supplier person responsible for capacity planning
Signed Signature of above
Review Box: Date Date completed
Review Frequency Detail the frequency that capacity is reviewed.
Next Review Date Date of next formal capacity review.

Tier-n capacity (upon request)


Item Completion Instructions
Using operation # (see process chart) number of the internal process operation where the component is used
Supplier name Name of one or more forecasted supplier
Type of Process technology Main process involved : ex plastic injection, stamping, assembly, surface treatment,…
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Current Weekly Capacity Capacity given by the supplier taking into account the forecast usage rate (next 2nd column)
Nb shifts per week equivalent of 8h shifts
Percentage of the bottleneck machine In the case of capacity or several customers processes, please clarify the workload the supplier intends to use for the part
of Tier-2 dedicated to the product concerned.
Tier-n (n>2) capacity check achieved? Yes if the Tier-2 supplier is able to fulfill a document similar to this one with its own suppliers.

Ramp-Up plan (upon request)


Item Completion Instructions
Nominal cycle time including periodic operations included in standard (ex: boxes carrying, drill replacement).
Standard Cycle time
Not include changeover time.
Planned OEE (without scraps) (%) These percentages are for the facility available forecast
Planned cumulated scraps (%) Sum of scrap rates from this operation and all next ones
Planned Practical capacity per hour (Automatic ticketing )
Planned working hours per week Number of working hours needs to fill-in.
Planned production capacity per week (Automatic ticketing )
Renault Required quantity (Parts) "Renault required quantity" taken from CEC Document. Number is sum of left and right parts.

FVC Bottleneck (upon request)


Item Completion Instructions
Bottle Neck Process Process name which has interfered with production (long cycle time, bad direct first run rate) is filled in.
Parts number (10 digit) Part number which is issued by Renault / Nissan design department.
Planned Working Shifts per day Working shift per day.
Down time Operation Time per day [A] Working time per day. No included lunch time and break time.
Working Days per month [B] Working day per month no included days off.
Cycle Time |C] Average measure of REAL time.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Capacity Utilization Rate [D] Automatic calculation need to input [d] data
Machine breakdown time
The average time for any required tooling changeover for manufacture of different products in the facility, quoted as a
Changeover time
time per changeover.
Maintenance time Total real maintenance time per month/working days. To fill in average of maintenance time per day.
The ratio of OK in an object process or the bad rate of a direct first run rate is filled in.
Ratio or Straight Through Ratio [E]
(OK rate =>80% and direct first run rate =>70% of case fills in 70% of a direct first run rate.)
Production Capacity per month [F] (Automatic ticketing )
Total Demand [G] Input each demand value then automatic calculation

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
PCP (mandatory) Page 1

ANPQP - PRODUCTION CAPACITY PLAN (PCP)

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S Doc Ref. No. / Ver.:
A B C OBD Doc. Rev. Date:
R
Doc. Origin Date:
Supplier Name: Supplier Code: E-mail:
Supplier Plant Name: Author: Tel. No:
Part Name: Remark
Part No. & Issue Level:
Design Note No. / DEVO:
Gray boxes can be either filled or calculated
Planned capacity
(ANPQP : production capacity plan document)
Next Process Machine Name of Ref List of Standard Nb Average This operation Cumulated Effective Nb hours Nb shifts Total Number of Percentage Number of part Current Weekly
operation operation type and the part final cycle time parts/cycle operational scrap rate Downstrea capacity per per shift per week Weekly machines of (from this capacity
Identificatio produced product [sec] efficiency [%] m scraps hour (same base working production operation) used (equivalent
n by this using (based on [%] as OEE time allocated to per final final product)
operation this Ref. production (this op. calculation) thisRenault- product
results) [%] included) Nissan parts (coefficient)
(not final
including product [%]
scraps)

Milling A Milling
10 20 Plane machine Bearing cap 123 123 300 2 85.0% 0.00% 0.00% 20.40 7.0 18 126.0 1.0 100.0% 1.0 2570
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0

Details when applicable:


Annual Capacity RFQ Required Volume GAP
- Number of operators : - Working shift per day
- Scrap rates : 0.00% - Operation Time per day - JPH
- Variant mix constraints : - Working Days per Year - Working days per year 0 RFQ Required (Annual)
- Changeover times : - Shifts per day 0
- Changeover frequency : - Operation time per shift #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
- Forecasted OEE (without scrap) (%) 85.0%
Percentage of facility available: - Cumulated Downstream scraps [%]
(this op. included,Forecast serial life) 0.00%
- Alliance production Tool life expectancy: - Allocation ratio for alliance production
- Alliance aftersales Efficiency levels:
- Other customers
- Free Annual Capacity Volume #DIV/0!

Copyright (C) Renault-NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Tier-n Capacity (upon request) Page 2

Supply chain investigation : Tier-2 and more Firm/Plant : Reference/Index :

Designation :

Weekly Capacity Process - Request of RNPO - [parts] Site : Vehicle/Function :

All Significative and specific parts are to be listed bellow.

Planned capacity Confirmed capacity Flexibility


(see ANPQP production capacity plan document)
Part name and/or Using operation # Supplier name Type of Process Planned Part Planned Number Percentage of the Current Part Current weekly Number of Percentage of the Assessment way Tier-n (n>2) Standard Components
reference (see process technology weekly coefficient weekly of shifts bottleneck weekly coefficient capacity shifts used bottleneck (subcontractor capacity Lead-time for delivery stock (in days of
chart) capacity per final capacity used per machine of Tier-2 capacity per final (equivalent final per week machine of Tier-2 self assessment assessment production)
product (equivalent week dedicated to the product product) dedicated to the or visit) achieved ?
ABC Carrier injection final product) product product
Carrier Renault JFC Left 1 Tautenhahn mold 850 1 850 10 17
ABC Carrier injection
Carrier Renault JFC Right 1 Tautenhahn mold 850 1 850 10 17

Copyright (C) Renault-NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Ramp-up capa plan (upon request Page 3

Ramp-up capacity plan Firm/Plant : Reference/Index : Remarks

Designation :
Site : Vehicle/Function :

Planned Planned Ramp-up Capacity


Planned OEE Planned Practical Planned production Renault
Standard Cycle (without cumulated scraps capacity per working hours capacity per Required
Period (week) time scraps) (%) (%) hour per week week quantity (Parts) ACTION PLAN 700

W0315 96 60.0% 5.0% 21.4 7.5 160 23


600
W0415 96 60.0% 5.0% 21.4 7.5 160 108

W0515 96 60.0% 5.0% 21.4 7.5 160 158 500


"Renault required quantity" taken
W0615 96 70.0% 5.0% 24.9 15 374 209
from CEC Document
400

parts/w
W0715 96 70.0% 5.0% 24.9 15 374 259 Number is sum of left and right parts.
W0815 96 70.0% 3.0% 25.5 22.5 573 418 300
Numbers apply to "Capteur
W0915 96 80.0% 3.0% 29.1 22.5 655 468 Antipincement " only
200
W1015 96 80.0% 3.0% 29.1 22.5 655 518

W1115 96 80.0% 3.0% 29.1 22.5 655 569 100

W1215 96 80.0% 3.0% 29.1 22.5 655 569


0
W1315 96 80.0% 2.0% 29.4 22.5 662 612

W1415 96 80.0% 2.0% 29.4 22.5 662 612


Renault Required quantity (Parts) Weeks
Planned production capacity per week
W1515 96 80.0% 2.0% 29.4 22.5 662 612

W1615 96 80.0% 2.0% 29.4 22.5 662 612 Ram-up programming :

W1715 96 80.0% 2.0% 29.4 22.5 662 612

W1815 96 80.0% 2.0% 29.4 22.5 662 612

W1915 96 80.0% 2.0% 29.4 22.5 662 612

W0927 96 80.0% 2.0% 29.4 22.5 662 612 2

W0928 96 80.0% 2.0% 29.4 22.5 662 612

W0929 96 80.0% 1.5% 29.6 22.5 665 612

W0930 96 80.0% 1.5% 29.6 22.5 665 612

W0931 96 80.0% 1.5% 29.6 22.5 665 612

Copyright (C) Renault-NISSAN All Rights Reserved


FVC - Bottleneck (upon request) Page 4

PRODUCTION CAPACITY PLAN (Attachment sheet)


< Capacity Capability to support peak volume >

※To fill in below sheet according to Nissan request .


Bottle Neck Process Assy process Nissan and Other OEM

Parts number (10 digit) AAAAA, BBBBB, CCCCC 1 parts in 1 line

Working Shifts per day 2 [shifts/day]

<Sample> Working Time : 8:00 - 16:00, 20:00 - 4:00 / 960 min


830 Lunch Time : 12:00 - 12:45, 0:00 - 0:45 / 90 min
[A] Operaton Time per day [minutes/day]
Break Time : 10:00 - 10:10, 15:00 - 15:10, 22:00 - 22:10, 3:00 - 3:10 / 40 min
*Excluded Lunch Time and Break Time Operation Time = 960 min - 90 min - 40 min = 830 min

*YYYY/MM [days/month]

[B] Working Days per month Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
*Depend on Calendar month or Weekly month

[C] Cycle Time 30 [seconds/pcs]


*Average of 20 times

[D] Capacity Utilization Rate 89.2% [%]


*D = (A - d) / A

Unexpected Down time Machine breakdown time 30 [Average minutes/day]

Changeover time 45 [Average minutes/day]

Maintenance time 15 [Average minutes/day]


Planned Down time
Time for making trial parts 0 [Average minutes/day]

OTHERS 0 [Average minutes/day]

[d] Average Down time per day 90 [Average minutes/day]


*Based on result of last month

[E] OK Ratio or Straight Through Ratio 80.0% [%]

[pcs/month]

[F] Production Capacity Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 TOTAL
per month 36,704 33,152 36,704 35,520 36,704 35,520 36,704 36,704 35,520 36,704 35,520 36,704 432,160
*F = (3,600 / C * D * E) * (A / 60 * B)

[pcs/month]

Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 TOTAL
YNM 1,200 13,000 12,300 12,300 12,300 12,300 12,300 12,300 12,300 12,300 12,300 12,300 137,200
DFL 2,500 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 122,500
0
0
0
Nissan Plant 1,200 15,500 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 259,700
0
0
0
0
0
Nissan IPC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A 0
B 0
C 0
0
0
Other OEM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

[G] Total Demand 1,200 15,500 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 259,700

[H] Difference ##### 17,652 12,404 11,220 12,404 11,220 12,404 12,404 11,220 12,404 11,220 12,404 172,460
*H = F - G

40,000

35,000

30,000

25,000

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

0
Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14

Nissan Plant Nissan IPC Other OEM Production Capacity

【Countermeasure】
Category Take countermeasure items Responsibility Due date

Quality
OK ratio & STR achieve the target

Man

Machine
Special team for Maintenance & Quality

Stock level increase


Material Stock frequency increase

Outsourcing
Method Bank build

Copyright (C) Renault-NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Capacity Submission Warrant (CSW) (Renault)

Key Point(s):

 The Capacity Submission Warrant gives the demonstration that the suppliers’ industrial system is apt and able to respond to Renaults’
production volumes & lead-time Targets, during the increase in production and serial mass production phase.
 The production volumes & lead-time Targets are given by Renault.
 Group of part references (one group per document) are proposed by Renault according to Supplier processes.
 Supplier has to contact Renault Purchasing Department in case of remarks on parts groups.
 The supplier shall document his industrial production capacities in accordance to :
 The Production Capacity Plan Results
 The Supplier Production Preparation Monitoring Status Report
 This is denoted in weekly volumes of parts to be produced for a given period, agreed in accordance with the increase in given
production or the quarter Renault Reference Capacity.
 The industrial capacity can be proved and backed up through supplementary documents (mix theory, Capacity Survey Vx…).
 All capacity evolution has to be agreed by Renault prior to any change.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The supplier must use the ANPQP document format and is not allowed to use its own document
 The supplier must submit the "Capacity Submission Warrant" for Renault Approval before Supplier Start of Production (Supplier SOP)
 For rules related to document submission, refer to the Ground Rules of Document Submission page

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Output Document Description

Item Completion Instructions


R / N Project Renault or Nissan Vehicle /Power train unit project for which the parts are being developed.
Supplier Name Supplier Company name.
Location where the parts will be produced.
Supplier Plant Note : If the site supplying off-tool parts for a trial build is different to that supplying off-process parts for a later
trial, this should be discussed with Renault before inclusion in the Supplier Plan.
Supplier Code Numeric code unique to each supplier, issued by Renault Purchasing Dept.
Person responsible of the Activities to be made in order to fulfill the document with representative and valid
Author / Tel No datas.
Indicate the phone number of the Author.
Reference taken by the Supplier for the Document.
Document Reference No /Version
Sequential number to indicate the version No of the document.
Document Revision Date Date corresponding to the new document version release.
Document Origin Date Date corresponding to the initial document version release.
Part Name The part name or description shown on the Design Drawing.
Part No & Issue level As issued by Design.
Design Note / DEVO As issued by Design.
Reason for submission Check (tick) the appropriate box(es).

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Details/other Give any details appropriate to explain the reason for submission e.g. Process change number.
Communication of weekly capacity needs documented by RNPO : weekly volume in number of parts for
Ramp up period (Period one to Period six)
each period. (Week "x" to week "y") according to Renault ramp up. Example : W20 to 26 = 150
Part Number  As issued by Design.
Family / Part description  The part name or description shown on the Design Drawing.
Cases of use Communicate documented Renault Projects Names for which the part is used.
Global volume to use for your answer Indicate the Sum of the volumes expected for each period.
Indicate Supplier capacity response to the weekly capacity needs documented by RNPO, expressed in
Supplier Response (weekly quantity) (Period one to
number of parts for each period.
Period six)
Supplier gives a global answer for all parts considered in the document.
Communication of weekly capacity needs documented by RNPO : weekly volume in terms of number of
Capacity Reference (weekly quantity)
parts for each period (each period corresponds to 4 months)
(one to six) = => V :
Indicate de Capacity Referential Number V”x” given by RNPO.
Supplier Response (weekly quantity) Indicate Supplier capacity response to the weekly capacity needs documented by RNPO, expressed in
(Period one to Period six) number of parts for each period.
Items attached to this submission warrant Check (tick) the appropriate box(es)
Describe any Deviation from the declaration.
Declaration
Sign to confirm statement including printed name, position and date.
Note: Approval by Renault shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
.RENAULT S.A.

ANPQP - Capacity Submission Warrant - Renault

Document Reference No / Version :


Renault Project : B98 11111/A
Document Revision Date : 06/09/10

Supplier Name: Rapid Automotive Supplier Code: 00024524 01 Document Origin Date : 07/09/10
Supplier Plant : Barcelona Author : John Thomson Tel N° : 33 43583924
Part Name : Bumper
Part No & Issue level : 8200 585 523 / 524 /525/526/527/528 Index : D
Design Note / DEVO :

Reason for Submission Initial Submission Design Change Location Change Details/other :
Re-Submission Process Change Tooling Replacement
Material Change Sub-Supply Change Tooling Refurbishment

Ramp up (weekly Quantity)


Part No Family / Part Name Cases of use 2011,S10-S11 2011,S12-S14 2011,S14-S15 2011,S16-S17 2011,S18-S25 2011,S25-S52

8200585523 Bumper N°1 White B98 250 300 400 500 1000 2000
8200585524 Bumper N°2 Green B98 50 60 100 100 500 1000
8200585525 Bumper N°3 Yellow B98 100 80 120 140 300 2000
8200585526 Bumper N°4 Red B98 70 80 100 100 150 1500
8200585527 Bumper N°5 Black B98 50 60 100 100 150 1500
8200585528 Bumper N°6 Orange B98 60 70 80 90 100 1000

Global volume to use for your answer 580 650 900 1030 2200 9000

Supplier Response (weekly Quantity)


Part No Family / Part Name Cases of use Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Period 4 Period 5 Period 6
Weekly capacity 600 700 950 2000 4000 12000

Capacity Reference (weekly Quantity) ==> V :


Year + 1 Year +2
1st Four 3rd Four 3rd Four
Part No Family / Part Name Cases of use Month
2nd Four Month
Month
1st Four Month 2nd Four Month
Month
8200585523 Bumper N°1 White B98 1000 1500 2000 2500 2000 2500
8200585524 Bumper N°2 Green B98 1000 700 1000 1100 1000 1500
8200585525 Bumper N°3 Yellow B98 800 1000 1500 1400 1000 1700
8200585526 Bumper N°4 Red B98 600 450 1000 700 800 900
8200585527 Bumper N°5 Black B98 400 600 900 600 800 1200
8200585528 Bumper N°6 Orange B98 750 550 1000 700 700 800

Global volume to use for your answer 4550 4800 7400 4550 4550 8600

Supplier Response (weekly Quantity) ==> V : 5


Year + 1 Year +2
1st Four 2nd Four 3rd Four 1st Four 2nd Four 3rd Four
Part No Family / Part Name Cases of use Month Month Month Month Month Month
Weekly capacity 5000 6000 8000 8000 8000 9000

Items attached to this Submission Warrant:


Production Capacity Plan
Other :

Supplier Declaration :
I confirm that the information covered by this documentation confirm that our industrial system is operational, at the level of performance foreseen to
manufacture and to deliver products in conformity to the specifications, to the requested volume and at the requested date. Any deviation from this
declaration are as follows :

Name John Thomson Position Capacity Manager


Signature J. Thomson Date 03/08/2010

RENAULT APPROVAL
APPROVAL INTERIM APPROVAL REJECTED

Name Marc Germain Name Name

Position Purchaser Position Position

Signature M.Germain Signature Signature

Date 07/09/2010 Date Date

Note: Approval by Renault shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.

RENAULT COMMENT (mandatory in the case of Interim Approval or Rejection):

ANPQP-2007-0481-EN-10-Capacity_Submission_Warrant - Copyright © Renault / Nissan


Page 1 of 1
3.3 Project Risk and Concern Management

Activity Purpose:

 Identify all project risks and concerns, and manage corrective and preventative actions during design and product/process development.

Note(s):

Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity  Identify and record all project risks and concerns during design and product/process development.
Content  Identify and record the root cause(s) and countermeasure(s) and define the implementation schedule
 Confirm that the effect of potential countermeasures will not cause new concerns
 Confirm implementation and effectiveness of all countermeasures
 Share countermeasure details with Renault-Nissan
Output  Project Development Record
Document

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number:

 7.1 Planning of product realization (for example; 7.1.4 Change control)


 7.2 Customer-related process (for example; 7.2.3 Customer communication)
 7.3 Design and development
 8.2 Monitoring and measurement
 8.5 Improvement (for example; 8.5.2 Corrective action)

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Project Development Record (PDR)

Key Point(s):

 The purpose of the Project Development Record is to compile on one form, all concerns and development issues identified during the product
development and production preparation phase. This document will operate as a project diary.
 The document will serve as an historical reference when conducting an analysis of design or process failure and effects study on future projects.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The Project Development Record should include:


 Concerns or proposals identified by Renault-Nissan
 Concerns or proposals identified by the supplier
 Root cause
 New items raised during any process reviews or Production Preparation Monitoring meetings
 Temporary and permanent countermeasures
 Gauging concerns (resulting from calibration, changes or maintenance of design level)
 Major design changes
 Parts history
 Major process changes.
 The Project Development Record shall be started at the outset of the Project and shall be updated and available for submission at each trial build.

Output Document Description:

Item Completion Instructions


Renault or Nissan Vehicle / Power train project for which the part is being developed /
R / N Project
manufactured.
Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed / manufactured.
Renault - CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Document Reference No./ Version The Suppliers reference no. and version no. for the document.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name Supplier Company name.

Location at which the product will be produced.


Note:
Supplier Plant If the site supplying off-tool parts for a trial build is different to those supplying off-process parts
for a later trial, this should be discussed with Renault-Nissan and should be reflected in all
project management documentation.

Supplier Code Unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault-Nissan Purchasing Dept.
Author The name of the person who created / revised the document.
E-mail The E-mail address of the person who created / revised the document.
Tel No: The telephone number of the person who created / revised the document.
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing.
Part No. & Issue Level As issued by Renault-Nissan design department.
Design Note No. / DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed / manufactured.
Detail The concern detail with sketch whenever possible.
Raised by The name of the person responsible for raising the report.
Date The date of raising the report.
Build The trial build at which the identified concern was raised.
Root cause Details of root cause(s). The original report should contain full and extensive information.
Details of temporary/permanent countermeasures.
Countermeasure
The original report should contain full and extensive information.
Design note Design note number for any countermeasures which result in a design change.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Supplier's judgment of the effectiveness the countermeasures. Enter OK or NOK for each
Judgment
subsequent trial build.
Date The date of the judgment.
Countermeasure confirmation by supplier following achievement of off-tool / off-process fully
Confirmation
tested countermeasured part or process.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
ANPQP - PROJECT DEVELOPMENT RECORD

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
X123
A B C OBD
Doc. Rev. Date: Sep. 20th 2011
R 2
Doc. Origin Date: Jun. 23th 2011
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A999 E-mail: taro@mail.nissan.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama-Plant Author: Taro Nissan Tel: +81-(0)46-270-1894
Part Name: Kick Plate Inner Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 12345 XX123
Design Note No. / DEVO: TQ2345

No. Detail T0 T1 VC-LOT PT1 PT2


Gap to finisher. Dimensional error, part NG
to specification.

Root cause
Concern identified during T0 off-tool trial
Injection tooling incorrect Confirmed OK following T01
inspection activity.
accuracy trial part inspection activity.

Report
No. Tool modification will be
Countermeasure

finished by 20/08/2011, plan


to confirm OK at T1 trial,
planned 25/08/2011

Design Note: TQ1234 Design Note: TQ1234 Design Note: Design Note: Design Note:
Raised by: NISSAN Date: 22/6/2011 Judgement: NG Date: 26/8/2011 Judgement: OK Date: Judgement: Date: Judgement: Date: Judgement:
Date: 6/22/2011 Build: T0 trial Confirmation NG - 22/6/11 (J Smith, NEPQE) OK - 26/8/11 (J Smith, NEPQE)
Sharp edge identified during T1 trial.
Design mismatch, design note (TQ-2345
Root cause

issued for VC-LOT adoption) Design Note (TQ-2345, for Confirmed OK during VC-
VC-LOT adaption) has not LOT part source inspection
applied yet. activity at supplier

Report
No. Desigh note (TQ-2345)
Countermeasure

conents will be applied next


tool modification at 5/9/2011.
Part confirmation for VC-lot
planned at 14/9/2011

Design Note: Design Note: TQ1234 Design Note: TQ2345 Design Note: Design Note:
Raised by: NISSAN Date: Judgement: Date: 26/8/2011 Judgement: NG Date: 15/9/2011 Judgement: OK Date: Judgement: Date: Judgement:
Date: 26/8/2011 Build: T1 trial Confirmation NG - 26/8/11 (J Smith, NEPQE) OK - 15/9/11 (J Smith, NEPQE)

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


4. PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

Category Purpose:

 Design a product to meet the Renault-Nissan technical specifications and requirements.

Element Activity:

 4.1 Product and Process Design Review


 4.2 Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
 4.3 Identification and Deployment of Special Characteristics and Key Features
 4.4 Engineering Product Specifications / Drawing Study and Completion
 4.5 Special Characteristics Management (Control of Product and Process)

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
4.1 Product and Process Design Review

Purpose:

In order to assure the quality requirements from Renault-Nissan, suppliers and Renault-Nissan need to clarify potential quality problems and
solve them in design or development stage. Design review is held to prevent all the possible quality problems before their occurrence.
In addition to the supplier internal design review, Renault-Nissan requires to attend on joint design review with Renault-Nissan based on the
assessment level.

Notes:

 Design review implementation timing is required to be clarified in supplier master schedule or its substitute documents.
 Full Process DR is applied to the system that is assessed as level H as a joint design review with Renault-Nissan.
 Quick DR is applied to the system that is assessed as level M as a joint design review with Renault-Nissan.

Full Process DR
Activity Purpose: :
Full Process DR is applied to systems / parts having high newness such as first adoption in the world or first adoption in Renault-Nissan (are
equivalent to assessment level H) as proactive prevention activities against potential quality problems.
Design and production engineers in suppliers and Renault-Nissan jointly detect potential failure modes and decide countermeasure against
them by using standardized tools such as Design Potential FMEA / FTA.
Important characteristics that must be controlled in mass-production process and control plans for these characteristics are clarified by using
the standardized tools that Renault-Nissan requires.
Results are reviewed by expert reviewers of Renault-Nissan in order to study any risk to quality.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Activity Content:

Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity  Share the basic structure of the target  Consider countermeasures against  Consider countermeasures against
Contents
system by using System Structure extracted quality problems through extracted quality problems through
Diagram and break down the prototype confirmation or experiment. mass-production parts confirmation or
functionality requirement of the system  Identify important characteristics and experiment.
to each component element by using establish the control plan in  Confirm the established control plan in
Function Block Diagram. mass-production process. mass-production process regarding the
 Detect potential failure modes and  Suppliers participate in the joint design important characteristics.
analyze their causes and effects and review at the request of Renault-Nissan  Suppliers participate in the joint design
finally decide countermeasures against and revise related actions and review at the request of Renault-Nissan
them by using design FMEA. documents as necessary based on and revise the related actions and
FTA shall be applied to significant instruction from reviewers. documents as necessary based on
system fault as necessary to clarify all instruction from reviewers.
the causes of the fault and decide  At the request of Renault-Nissan,
countermeasures against them. suppliers hold process check for the
 The candidates of the important mass-production process. This process
characteristics that need to be controlled check will involve the reviewers.
in mass-production process are
selected based on the results of FMEA /
FTA.
 Suppliers participate in the joint design
review at the request of Renault-Nissan
in order to leverage the expertise of
reviewers.
The results of study (FMEA / FTA) are
revised as necessary.
Output  System Structure Diagram
Documents
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
 Function Block Diagram
 Design Potential FMEA
 Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
 HCPP (Renault) or QA table A and B (Nissan)

Quick DR
Activity Purpose: :
Engineers of suppliers and Renault-Nissan jointly conduct proactive prevention against defects and customer dissatisfaction issues swiftly
and efficiently by focusing on changes in design (assessment level M). Defects and customer dissatisfaction issues caused by changing
points are expected to be found through intensive discussion among design, test and production engineers of suppliers and Renault-Nissan.
Countermeasures for these issues are filled in the DRBFM worksheet from the viewpoints of design, test and manufacturing.
Finally, the results are reviewed by expert reviewers of Renault-Nissan in order to study any risk to quality.

Activity Content:

Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity  In the pre-preparation step, summarize changing points  If newness level of a design change in phase 3, 4 or 5
Content
between base design and new design in the Changes List is same level with assessment level M, Quick DR is
form. conducted focusing on the changes in design. Basic
Based on the Changes List, consider concerns related to the procedure is same as described for phase 2.
changing points and summarize the results in the preparation
section of the DRBFM worksheet.
The preparation section of the DRBFM worksheet starts with
the column “part name” and ends with column
“countermeasure to eliminate the concerns”.
 In the preparation step, design, test and production engineers
of suppliers and Renault-Nissan gather to have an intensive
discussion focusing on results of the pre-preparation.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Participants of the discussion must focus on changing points
to find concerns related to the changing points efficiently.
Countermeasures for the identified concerns are filled in the
DRBFM worksheet separated by responsibility: design, test
and manufacturing.
 In the review step, expert reviewers review the results of the
preparation and determine necessary actions. The necessary
actions and any actions added by the reviewer are filled in the
review section of the DRBFM worksheet. The responsible
person and due date must be clarified for each action.
 In the action step, action results must be filled in the DRBFM
worksheet. The worksheet is submitted to Renault-Nissan
after completion of all actions.
Responsible person in Renault-Nissan judges completion of
the Quick DR.
Output  Changes List
Documents  DRBFM worksheet

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number:

 7.1 Planning of product realization


 7.2 Customer-related processes
 7.3 Design and development

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Supplier Internal Design Review Record (SIDRR)

Key Point(s):

 The Supplier Internal Design Review Record is a summary of the main issues discussed in the supplier internal design reviews. It shall include a list
of issues identified and countermeasures implemented. Attached to this summary are the minutes of all the internal design reviews.
 The Supplier Internal Design Review Record is used to confirm that the product and process targets in each phase of Alliance New Product Quality
Procedure (ANPQP) were achieved and all issues/ concerns have been resolved.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The Supplier Internal Design Review Record shall cover the following items as a minimum:
 Review of the output documents from the Project Risk and Concern Management activity
 Design/ functional requirement considerations (Appearance/ Shape/ Performance/ function etc.)
 Formal reliability level and confidence level targets
 Component/ sub-system/ system duty cycles (Reliability/ Durability)
 Computer simulation and bench test results
 Analysis of Potential Failure and Effects
 Review of the design for manufacture and assembly effort
 Assembly build variation results
 Test failures
 Design verification progress
 Regulatory requirements
 Logistics and Packaging

Output Document Description:

 Supplier own document

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Full Process DR Record

Key Point(s):

 The Full Process DR Record is a summary of main issues discussed with Renault / Nissan in Full Process DR.
 The Full Process DR Record is used to confirm that product and process targets in each phase of ANPQP were achieved and all issues / concerns have been
resolved.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 Full Process DR Record shall cover following items as a minimum:


 Basic structure of the system to which Full Process DR is applied
 Function Block Diagram of the system and component elements
 Environmental and usage conditions that need to be considered including logistics and packaging
 Regulatory Requirements
 Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) results
 Design verification results against failure modes extracted through FMEA
 Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) results
 Computer simulation and bench test results
 Countermeasures for problems identified through the computer simulation and bench test
 Important control characteristics and Process Capability Index
 For rules related to document submission, refer to the Ground Rules of Document submission page.

Output Document Description:

Describe the documents that Renault / Nissan requires based on the contents shown above.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Quick DR Record

Key Point(s):

 The Quick DR Record is a summary of main issues discussed with Renault / Nissan in Quick DR.
 The Quick DR Record is used to confirm that product and process targets in each phase of ANPQP were achieved and all issues / concerns have been resolved.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 Quick DR Record shall cover following items as a minimum:

 Base design and changing points from the base design (Changes List)
 Concerns related to the changing points and their effects (DRBFM) results
 Design verification results for concerns identified through DRBFM
 Computer simulation and bench test results
 Countermeasures for problems identified through the computer simulation and bench test
 Important control characteristics and Process Capability Index

 For rules related to document submission, refer to the Ground Rules of Document submission page.

Output Document Description:

Describe the documents that Renault / Nissan requires based on the contents shown above.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
4.2 Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis

Activity Purpose:

 Identify potential design failure modes, their associated causes and their effects.
 Implement effective and adequate countermeasures for the potential failure modes and their associated causes.

Note(s):

 Significant system faults shall be analysed using FTA (Fault Tree Analysis) to identify all possible causes and implement countermeasures for
them.
 The scope of this activity will be decided through discussion between Renault / Nissan and suppliers.

Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity  Organize the system  Review and update related output documents whenever the design is changed
Content structure and functions or modified.
using System Structure
Diagram and Function
Block Diagram.
 Detect potential failure
modes and decide
countermeasures for
them using FMEA /
DRBFM.
 Incorporate the
countermeasures in
drawing / CAD data etc.
 Clarify important control
characteristics that need
to be controlled in
mass-production
process to realize

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
product function.

Output  System Structure Diagram


Document  Function Block Diagram
 Design FMEA
 FTA (Fault Tree Analysis)
 Changes List (Quick DR)
 DRBFM worksheet (Quick DR)

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number

 7.3 Design and development

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
System Structure Diagram (SSD)

Key Point(s):

 System Structure Diagram is a diagram to break down the system to sub-system and components hierarchically and show the newness of each
sub-system or component. It is used to extract all the components and judge the adequate failure mode analysis method (FMEA (Failure Mode
Effective Analysis) or DRBFM (Design Review Based on Failure Mode)) based on the newness level of each sub-system or component.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The System Structure Diagram shall include:


 Express the hierarchic structure between system, sub-systems and components.
 Add the newness level by each sub-system or component on the diagram.

Output Document Description:

 Supplier own document

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Function Block Diagram (FBD)

Key Point(s):

 Function Block Diagram is a diagram to break down the system to component parts hierarchically by focusing on the relationship among functions.
 Function of the parts, potential failure modes and points on design countermeasures are considered using Function Block Diagram in advance of
FMEA.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The Function Block Diagram shall include;


 Clarify the hierarchic structure between system and sub-system.
 Clarify all the components that compose each sub-system and function of each component.
 Clarify all the required parts to achieve the function of the component and add the function of each part.
 Express the above relation using logic tree.

Document Description:

 Supplier own document.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Design Potential FMEA

Key Point(s):

 The Design Potential FMEA is an analytical technique used by a cross-functional team to ensure that all potential failure modes and their
associated causes have been identified and actioned. Complete assemblies, along with every related system, subassembly and component shall
be evaluated.
 The Design Potential FMEA does not rely on process controls to overcome potential design weaknesses, but it does take the technical/physical
limits of the manufacturing/assembly process into consideration, for example;
 Necessary mould drafts
 Limited surface finish
 Assembling space / access for tooling
 Limited hardenability of steels
 Tolerance / process capability / performance
 The Design Potential FMEA can also take into consideration the technical / physical limits of product maintenance (service) and recycling, for
example;
 Tool access
 Diagnostic capability
 Material classification symbols (for recycling)
 When developing countermeasure actions for potential failure modes, the supplier shall ensure that the feasibility of each countermeasure from a
manufacturing perspective is analysed before implementing the action.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The supplier shall ensure consistency throughout all documentation (e.g.: Control plan, Process Flow Chart , Special Characteristic and Key
Features Diagram, Inspection Report, FMEA) for:
 Operation step numbering
 Product characteristics identification

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Output Document Description:

Item Completion Instructions


R / N Project The Renault-Nissan Vehicle/Power train project for which the product is being
developed/manufactured.
Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed/manufactured.
Renault – CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Document Reference No./Version The suppliers reference No. and version No. for the document.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name The supplier name.
Supplier Plant The location at which the product will be manufactured.
Supplier Code A unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault- Nissan purchasing department.
Author The name of the person who created/revised the document.
e-mail The e-mail address of the person who created/revised the document.
Tel The telephone number of the person who created/revised the document.
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing.
Part No. & Issue Level: The part No. and issue level as issued by Renault-Nissan design department.
Design Note No./DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed/manufactured.
 This shall include all assemblies, sub-assemblies and components down to basic component
part level (e.g. Bolt, Gasket, etc.).
Item/Function  Describe as accurately as possible the function of each item.
 Where the item has multiple functions, each function shall be evaluated separately without
omission.
Anticipate and describe all possible ways the part could fail, not how it will fail.
Potential Failure Mode
When describing the failure mode, avoid using non-specific terms such as “damage” etc.
The supplier shall contact Renault/ Nissan in order to fully understand the functional relationship
Potential Effect(s) of Failure between the item being analysed and other vehicle parts/ systems. The effect(s) of the failure on
these functional relationships must be considered.
Potential Cause(s)/Mechanism(s) of Failure List every potential cause and/or failure mechanism for each failure mode.
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Study and describe the Recommended Actions from the point of view of Design revision/Design
Validation / Design Verification according to the result of Risk Priority Number (RPN)
assessment.
Recommended Actions such as, but not limited to, the following should be considered;
Recommended Actions
 Revised design geometry and / or Tolerances
 Revised material specification,
 Design of experiments,
Revised test plan (Design Verification and Product / Process Validation)
Responsibility & Target Completion Date
Action Result Action Taken

Note(s):

For Renault
 Unless otherwise agreed with Renault, the Supplier shall study and provide a "Product Potential FMEA" (Design Failure Modes, their Effects and
Criticality Analysis).
 The Supplier shall use his own standard for FMEA evaluation or, by default; the Supplier shall use the Renault standard 01-33-200.
 The supplier shall take into account the specific Vehicle Regulation requirements of each country of sale, and the EIC ("Evénements Indésirables
Client") / Feared Events (sent by Renault) when conducting this risk analysis.

For Nissan
 Follow the guidelines described in the AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group) Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) manual (latest
edition).

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)

Key Point(s):

 The Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) is a technic for system analysis where system faults are analysed using a top down approach from a single potential
failure mode to identify all possible causes.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) document shall include:


 Details of the top event or ultimate failure effect that was analysed.
 A list of the factors (e.g. usage conditions, environment, system limits etc.) and assumptions used in the analysis.
 A graphical representation of all possible causes of the top event (the fault tree), including both independent and interdependent causes
 All possible causes related to early failure, random failure and wears out failure.
 Recommendations for any countermeasures to be included in the product design.
 The supplier shall take into account the specific requirements of each sales country for Vehicle Regulations, and the feared customer events when
conducting this assessment level analysis.
 The FTA has to be linked with the FMEA study.

Output Document Description:

 Supplier own document

Note(s):

For Renault
 Unless otherwise agreed with Renault, the Supplier shall study and provide a FTA according to Renault standard 90-00-053.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Change List (CL)

Key Point(s):

 Changes list is a table to organize changing points from base design to new design by each component to clarify the changing points in new design
and judge the newness level.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The Changes List shall include:


 Fill in name and function of system, sub-system and part that was changed from the base design.
 Compare the specification between base design and new design and clarify the changing points, changes in detail and the objectives of the
changes.
 Evaluate the newness level for each changing point.

Output Document Description:

Item Completion Instructions

Renault or Nissan Vehicle / Power train project for which the product is being developed /
R / N Project
manufactured.

Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed / manufactured.
Renault - CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Document Reference No./ Version The Suppliers reference no. and version no. for the document.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name Supplier Company name.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Supplier Plant Location at which the product will be produced.
Supplier Code Unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault / Nissan Purchasing Dept.
Author The name of the person who created / revised the document
E-mail The E-mail address of the person who created / revised the document.
Tel The telephone number of the person who created / revised the document
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing
Part No. & Issue Level: As issued by Renault / Nissan design department
Design Note No. / DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed / manufactured.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
ANPQP - CHANGES LIST

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: ABC-010-9 / Ver.2
432 Doc. Rev. Date: Mar 4th 2013
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: Mar 1st 2013
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: taro@abc.com
Supplier Plant: Atsugi-Plant Author: A. Taro Tel: +81-(0)46-270-XXXX
Part Name: Hood hinge Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 654XX XXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T04322

Function
Parts Base Design New Design Changing Point Newness
of the part

Hood -Popping up by Hood without mechanism for Hood with mechanism for -Strengthened
input force from pop-up function pop-up function hood inner reinforce
an actuator (G37 sedan) (G37 coupe) (shape & thickness)
-moving the hinge 3
fixing position to
0X direction (--mm)

Hood -Connecting a Hood hinge without pop-up Hood hinge with pop-up -Adding the pop-up
Hinge hood to body mechanism mechanism mechanism
with openable and (G37 sedan) (G37 coupe)
closable motions Pop-up mechanism
-Popping up a hood

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved 1/1


DRBFM Work Sheet

Key Point(s):

 The DRBFM (Design Review Based on Failure Mode) Work Sheet is used to identify potential concerns (failures/dissatisfactions) related to change.
The content of the document is used in the intensive discussion between the suppliers and Renault - Nissan during the “Quick DR” process to
identify actions and eliminate potential concerns.
 The DRBFM Work Sheet targets potential concerns from both design and manufacturing, including potential concerns affecting Renault - Nissan
assembly plants.
 The actions taken to eliminate each potential concern are determined from the view point of the Design, Evaluation (Test) and/or Manufacturing
functions in either the supplier or Renault - Nissan. Responsibility and timing for each action shall be clearly identified.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 Ensure that the requirements listed below are included.

Document Description:

Item Document Instruction


R / N Project Renault or Nissan Vehicle / Power train project for which the product is being developed /
manufactured.
Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed / manufactured.
Renault - CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Document Reference No./ Version The Suppliers reference no. and version no. for the document.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name Supplier Company name.
Supplier Plant Location at which the product will be produced.
Supplier Code Unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault-Nissan Purchasing Dept.
Author The name of the person who created / revised the document
E-mail The E-mail address of the person who created / revised the document.
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Tel The telephone number of the person who created / revised the document
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing
Part No. & Issue Level: As issued by Renault-Nissan design department
Design Note No. / DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed / manufactured.
Parts Fill in the name of the parts expressed in the drawings.
Changes to Design or Clarify the basis of design and fill in the changes to design or environment from the basis with the
Environment reasons of the changes.
Newness Fill in the newness of changes with Nissan.
Functions of the part Fill in the functions of the part precisely. If the part has multiple functions, fill in the all functions.
Concerns related to the change Failures/Dissatisfaction of the system/part
Concerns related Potential causes and Focus on the changes and pick up all concerns (failures/dissatisfactions) of the system/part.
to the change circumstances of Concerns Pick up all related concerns through the intensive discussion with all related engineers in Nissan.
Influences on For effective discussion, concerns should be expressed in sentences including the area of
vehicle / concerns and phenomenon instead of a simple word.
consumers Example: Early fatigue wear at the point A will be the concern due to the stress concentration by
the change in geometry. (× lack of strength)
Consider the influences on Fill in the potential causes and circumstances of concerns as concrete as possible.
vehicle and consumers They should be expressed in sentences instead of words for effective discussion.
related to the change.
Severity Fill in the failure grade as a severity of the concern (failure/dissatisfaction) with Renault-Nissan.
Actions taken to eliminate concerns by Design, Fill in the actions should be taken against the all concerns (failures/dissatisfactions) picked up.
Evaluation, Manufacturing Actions should be filled in separately divided in design, evaluation and manufacturing points of
view.
As a general rule, firstly actions by design should be clarified and the validation of the action
should be expressed as actions by evaluation.
Recommend Actions Fill in the recommended actions instructed by reviewers. Reviewer should review the all concerns,
(Results of Quick DR) causes and actions taken. The recommended actions should be filled in separately divided in
design, evaluation and manufacturing points of view.
The person in charge and dead-line should be filled in corresponding to all recommended actions.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
ANPQP - DRBFM (Design Review Based on Failure Mode) WORKSHEET

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: 12345 / N
X98A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/10/14
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/11/22
Supplier Name: ABC Industry Supplier Code: B023 E-mail: ebygum@abc-i.com
Supplier Plant: Barcelona Author: E Bygum Tel: +44 7895 156 456
Part Name: Fuel Filler Tube Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 56789 AB000
Design Note No. / DEVO: T12345

Changes Concerns related to the Recommend Actions


Actions taken to eliminate concerns by
to Design Functions change Influences on (Results of QuickDR) Action
New Seve
Parts or of Failures/Dissatis Potential causes vehicle / Dea Dea Dea Taken
Control Respon
Environm ness the Part rity Respon Respon
faction of and circumstances consumers Design Test Manufacturing Design d- Test d- Manufacturing d- (status)
of Concerns sibility sibility Level sibility
ent systems / parts line line line
Cap Protection
protector of
Shape cap at the
Soak up
(Narrower to 2mm
time of
opening 3 crash Liquid level
area) Neck level
Fix filler
tube
in body
It becomes The space to
difficult to insert a finger Xmm
C
open or close becomes >NDS Ymm
a fuel cap narrower
Keep The neck of Confirm
Layout
space filler tube is heap of
(Low
for soaked if the splashed
angle 3 Water gets
opening/ water piles up The neck level The weep mud from
opening into the fuel
closing in cap is lower than hole is weep hole
area) tank when cap C
cap protector the liquid level enlarged. by
is opened.
↓ (φ4.5→φ12) corrosion
The neck of durability
filler tube is test
rusted

Mud Confirm the


cover Material
A mud cover Change to level of corrode
(from
3 Protection corrodes C powder by corrosion
rubber
against and drops off coating durability
to steel)
mud test
splashed
by tires to Splashed mud Direction of
Confirm
Shape prevent is Filler tube is soak the
Mud cover is mud cover is
(Wider clogging heaped on rusted by neck in
open to the changed to
clearance 3 the weep the mud cover direction of filling cap C water by
prevent heap
from hole and clogged protector with corrosion
splashed mud of splashed
tube) the weep hole water durability
mud
test

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


4.3 Identification and Deployment of Special Characteristics and Key Features
Activity Purpose:

 Determine all Special Characteristics and Key Features related to the product.
 Determine the relationship between these characteristics and features and the manufacturing processes.
 Conduct a comprehensive activity to ensure that all of these characteristics and features are incorporated into the manufacturing process and are
controlled.

Note(s):

 Special Characteristics are identified by Renault-Nissan. For Renault, these include CSR. For Nissan, these include Important A, B, C and OBD.
 Key Features are identified by both the supplier and Renault-Nissan.
 These are features that have a significant effect upon fit, function, performance, reliability, appearance and serviceability and include all features
affecting type approval (homologation).

Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity
 Identify all Special Characteristics and Key Features related to the product using experience, knowledge of the
Content product, its intended use, and input from Renault-Nissan.
 Use appropriate tools (HCPP (Renault), QA table A/B (Nissan)) to determine
suitable methods to ensure the control of the identified characteristics &
features.
Output Special Characteristics and Key Features Diagram
Document HCPP (Renault)
QA Table A (Nissan)
Supplier Feasibility Commitment (Renault)
QA Table B (Nissan)

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number:

 7.2 Customer-related processes


 7.3 Design and development
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
HCPP (Renault)

Key Point(s):

 The HCPP (Hierarchical Organization of Product and Process Characteristics) is the resulting file of the following steps:
 Hierarchical Organization of Product Characteristics according to gravity in accordance with Renault Standards 01-33-301 and 00-10-040.
 Assessment of forecasted industrial feasibility.
 Action plan definition depending of criticality (gravity and feasibility matching) and follow-up.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 All Special Characteristics and Key Features shall be included in the HCPP study.

Output Document Description:

 Requirement for a RENAULT Vehicle Engineering part:


https://suppliers.renault.com, then click Quality > Chapter "Get a Standard" > Chapter "Download Tools"> HCPP and Capability for Vehicle
Engineering (TAG)".
 Requirement for a RENAULT Powertrain Engineering part:
https://suppliers.renault.com, then click Quality > Chapter "Get a Standard" > Chapter "Download Tools"> HCPP and Capability for Powertrain
machine capability (A2M)".

Note(s):

 For this Renault specific tool, RENAULT CONSULTING is able to provide HCPP training sessions (www.renault-consulting.com).

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
QA table A (Nissan)

Key Point(s):

 QA table A is a format to fill in important control characteristics with nominal values and tolerances and potential failures of the system that occur if
the part characteristic exceeds the established tolerance. It is used to transmit important control characteristics surely from design to production.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

The QA table A shall include:


 Fill in part name that has important control characteristic.
 Indicate important control portions using figures.
 Fill in important control characteristic with nominal value and tolerance.
 Fill in control level if it's provided.
 Fill in potential failure of the system that occurs if the part characteristic exceeds the established tolerance.

Document Description:

Item Completion Instructions


R / N Project The Renault-Nissan Vehicle/Power train project for which the product is being
developed/manufactured.
Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed/manufactured.
Renault – CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Document Reference No./Version The suppliers reference No. and version No. for the document.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name The supplier name.
Supplier Plant The location at which the product will be manufactured.
Supplier Code A unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault- Nissan purchasing department.
Author The name of the person who created/revised the document.
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
e-mail The e-mail address of the person who created/revised the document.
Tel The telephone number of the person who created/revised the document.
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing.
Part No. & Issue Level: The part No. and issue level as issued by Renault-Nissan design department.
Design Note No./DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed / manufactured.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
ANPQP - QA TABLE A

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: ABC-010-9 / Ver.2
422 A B C OBD
Doc. Rev. Date: Mar 4th 2013
R 2
Doc. Origin Date: Mar 1st 2013
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: taro@abc.com
Supplier Plant: Atsugi-Plant Author: A. Taro Tel: +81-(0)46-270-XXXX
Part Name: Claw Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 654XX XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T04222

Design Design Control Failure of the part that occur


Part Name Figure No Portion No Portion Part Characteristic
nominal value tolerance level when a product is not within the tolerance

Claw No.1 1 Claw portion Position of hole to fix 1.6mm ±0.2 normal +direction:
screw The claw can not be fixed to catcher by screw
(X direction) -direction:
The claw is broken by input force of actuator

Claw 2 Pipe portion of claw Hole diameter of pipe φ8 +0.1 normal +direction:
portion of claw -0 Backlash between shaft and pipe increases
-direction:
The shaft can not be inserted to the pipe

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved 1/1


Supplier Feasibility Commitment (SFC) - (Renault)

Key Point(s):

 The Supplier Feasibility Commitment is the supplier commitment for:


 The forecasted feasibility study is achieved
 All suitable devices monitoring are decided consistently with forecasted feasibility.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 No minimum requirement. (Use compulsory format)

Output Document Description:

Item Completion Instructions


Renault Project Renault Vehicle /Power train unit project for which the parts are being developed.
Special Characteristic Identification Renault - Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Supplier Name Supplier Company name.
Supplier Plant Location where the parts will be produced Note :
If the site supplying off-tool parts for a trial build is different to that supplying off-process parts for
a later trial, this should be discussed with Renault / Nissan before inclusion in the Supplier Plan.
Supplier Code Numeric code unique to each supplier, issued by Renault and / or Nissan Purchasing Dept.
Author Person responsible of the Activities to be made in order to full fill the document with
representative and valid dates.
Document Reference No /Version Reference taken by the Supplier for the Document.
Sequential number to indicate the version No of the document.
The version No will change with each change.
Document Revision Date Date corresponding to the new document version release.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Document Origin Date Date corresponding to the initial document version release.
Part Name The part name or description shown on the Design Drawing.
Part No & Issue level As issued by Design.
Design Note / DEVO As issued by Design.
Renault CSR/Key Features If the part is involved by special characteristics or key features, tick the relevant symbol.
Tick YES or NO for each question
Feasible Tick this box if the study demonstrates that product is feasible (means that HCPP is achieved
with “green” feasibility of characteristics, and drawings achieved).
Feasible with proposed improvement Tick this box if the study demonstrates that product is feasible as specified, even if some minor
changes are needed to improve the product or to reduce its cost.
Feasible with restriction Tick this box if the study demonstrates that product is feasible with some restriction which is
listed in an attached document.
Non feasible Tick this box if the feasibility is not demonstrated, and no action plan ensures removal of risks, or
necessary changes prevent from achieving targets.
Problem identified Description of the issue to deal with to make the product feasible.
Change requested Description of the proposed change;
Express product and / or process change.
Initial date Date for starting change study.
Pilot Supplier operational manager in charge of the issue.
Issue date Date of achievement of request change that is formalized by a design note.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
.RENAULT S.A.

ANPQP - Supplier Feasibility Commitment

Renault CSR S 1 Document Reference No / Version :


Renault Project : X333 R 2 SFC333/--C
Document Revision date : 30/03/2011

Supplier Name: LPCA Supplier Code: 11111 Document Origin Date : 26/03/11

Supplier Plant : FLPM Author : Mr Ducknee Tél. N° :33111223344

Part Name : Cargo Net

Part No & Issue level : 8200444333

Design Note / DEVO : C48484

With this Feasibility Commitment, the supplier undertakes with Renault to supply a product which can be manufactured, assembled, packed and sent by
answering the quality requirements, Cost and Delay of Renault. For that purpose, the supplier must be able to answer in a positive way the following questions
(which are not exhaustive). For any negative answer, the supplier has to argue all the anxieties or the changes proposed so as to allow answer the specified
requirements.

YES NO

Can the product be manufactured as it is specified in the engineering drawing and in the engineering product specification ?

Is the product correctly defined to enable feasibility evaluation ? Does it fulfill the REACH requirements ?

Can all specified characteristics be manufactured with the capability target that meet requirements ?

Is the manufacturing process known as mastered, or was it enough analyzed to anwer pertinently this evaluation of feasibility ?

Can the proposed manufacturing process answer the requirements of the levels of foreseen quantity ?

Does the study of Handling and Packaging Means demonstrate their efficiency ?

Can the product be manufactured without unusual risk of additional cost (tooling, alternate manufacturing methods…) ?

Name, position and signature of the person having to participate to the analysis of feasibility:

Name Position Signature Date


Mr Ducknee Quality Leader 26/03/2011

Mr Engin Engineering Leader 26/03/2011

Mr Log Logistic Leader 26/03/2011

Mr Manuf Manufacturing Plant Manager 26/03/2011

Mr Cost Cost Analysis Dept leader 26/03/2011

Conclusion - Feasibility level of the product :

Feasible The product can be manufactured as specified.

The product can be manufactured as specified, but some minor changes are needed to improve the
Feasible with proposed improvement
product, or to decrease its Cost.

Feasible with restriction The product as specified can be manufactured with difficulty. Minor changes are asked.

Major changes of the product are imperative so as to obtain a practicable industrial feasibility and a
Non feasible
production answering the Quality, Cost, Quantity and Delivery Dates Targets required by Renault.

Problem identified Change requested Initial Date Pilot Issue Date


Many lateral hooks diameter not large enough increase diameter by 2.5 mm to obtain maxi contact surface for 15/03/2011 MR Enging 23/03/2011
tolerances worst case situation (precaution on limit conditions)

definitive paint color not available on time for MA apply standard black for MA (covered by signed dispensation) 15/06/2011 Mr Manuf
apply serial black after 2 weeks for serial production

logistic flows not serial until 10/06/2011 apply agreeg final logistic flows 10/06/2011 Mr Log

Copyright © Renault / Nissan

Page 1 of 1
QA table B (Nissan)

Key Point(s):

 The QA table B is an association table between important control characteristics described in the QA table A and related production process. It is
used to organize process assurance methods for each important control characteristic.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The QA table B shall include:


 Fill in important control characteristics described in QA table A with nominal values and tolerances.
 Clarify the process closely related to the important control characteristics by composing the association table between important control
characteristics and related production process.
 Define process assurance method for each important process from the viewpoints of acceptance check, prevention of defective parts and
detection of defective parts.
 Fill in confirmation results of quality achievement level in each production process using process capability index.

Output Document Description:

Item Completion Instructions


R / N Project The Renault-Nissan Vehicle/Power train project for which the product is being
developed/manufactured.
Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed/manufactured.
Renault – CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Document Reference No./Version The suppliers reference No. and version No. for the document.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name The supplier name.
Supplier Plant The location at which the product will be manufactured.
Supplier Code A unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault- Nissan purchasing department.
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Author The name of the person who created/revised the document.
e-mail The e-mail address of the person who created/revised the document.
Tel The telephone number of the person who created/revised the document.
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing.
Part No. & Issue Level: The part No. and issue level as issued by Renault-Nissan design department.
Design Note No./DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed / manufactured.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Special Characteristics and Key Features Diagram (SCKFD)

Key Point(s):

 The Special Characteristics and Key Features Diagram is a document which identifies all key features and special characteristics.
 The Special Characteristics and Key Features Diagram shall be used :
 to define production and laboratory ongoing periodic testing.
 as a template for identifying the reporting items for trial inspection reports

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The Special Characteristics and Key Features Diagram shall include as a minimum:
 All Special Characteristics
 Dimensional key features. These may be in the form of a diagram with dimensions, tolerances etc. appended, a diagram with reference table
showing relevant dimensions, tolerances etc. and a table of dimensions, tolerances.
 Materials key features; (e.g. Specification type/grade. Mechanical and or chemical properties).
 Performance/ Function related key features (e.g. spot weld nugget size / strength, plating, contamination etc.)
 All key features shall be uniquely identified.
 The supplier must ensure consistency throughout all documentation (e.g.: Control plan, Process Flow Chart , Special Characteristic and Key
Features Diagram, Inspection Report, FMEA) for:
 operation step numbering
 product characteristics identification
 Items or features controlled by SPC (Statistical Process Control) should be identified as such on the document.

Output Document Description:

Item Completion Instructions


R / N Project The Renault-Nissan Vehicle/Power train project for which the product is being
developed/manufactured.
Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed / manufactured.
Renault – CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Document Reference No./Version The suppliers reference No. and version No. for the document.
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name The supplier name.
Supplier Plant The location at which the product will be manufactured.
Supplier Code A unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault- Nissan purchasing department.
Author The name of the person who created/revised the document.
e-mail The e-mail address of the person who created/revised the document.
Tel The telephone number of the person who created/revised the document.
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing.
Part No. & Issue Level: The part No. and issue level as issued by Renault-Nissan design department.
Design Note No./DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed / manufactured.
Prototype Check (tick) this box if this is a Prototype Special Characteristics and Key Features Diagram.
Pre-Production / Pre-Launch Check (tick) this box if this is a Pre-Production Special Characteristics and Key Features
Diagram.
Production Check (tick) this box if this is a Production Special Characteristics and Key Features Diagram.
Special Char. / Key Feature Ident'n Characteristic class according to the Renault/Nissan requirements:
(Special Characteristic / Key Feature  Refer to the “4.5 Special Characteristic Management”
Identification) Key Features Identification:
 The Supplier's own identification symbol should be used unless otherwise specified by
Renault/Nissan.
 Key Features shall include features affecting type approval (homologation, certification and
regulation) not included in Special Characteristics.
No. Unique identification reference for each Special Characteristic or Key Feature identified
Product Characteristics are the features or properties of a part, component or assembly that are
Product Characteristic described on engineering documents e.g. drawings, specifications or other engineering
information.
Specifications/ tolerances may be obtained from various engineering documents, such as, but
Specification/Tolerance not limited to, drawings, design reviews, material standard, computer-aided design data,
manufacturing, and/ or assembly requirements.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
ANPQP - SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS AND KEY FEATURES DIAGRAM

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
X11A Doc. Rev. Date: Aug 10th 2011
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: Aug 10th 2011
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: m-i@abc.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Chennai plant Author: M. Ince Tel: +81-(0)3-2456-7890
Part Name: Duct Assy Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 16640 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T43172

Special Char. /
Product Specification In Process
7 Key Feature No.
Ident'n
Characteristic /Tolerance Checks

1 Ctr Distance 184mm/±1.5 1st off/last off


11
2 Inner Diameter 63mm/±1.0 1st off/last off
2
3 Inner Diameter 45mm/+-1.0 1st off/last off

4 Inner Dimension 50mm/±1.0 1st off/last off

1 5 Inner Dimension 48mm/±1.0 1st off/last off

Model
6 Material - P.P 1st off/shift change
number ABC
^
7 Foam Material Model number 1234 1st off/shift change

Foam thickness 5mm/±0.5 1st off/last off

10 Foam width 10mm/±0.5 1st off/last off


11
8 Foam thickness 5mm/±0.5 1st off/last off

Foam width 10mm/±0.5 1st off/last off


3
9 Foam thickness 5mm/±0.5 1st off/last off
9
Foam width 10mm/±0.5 1st off/last off
8
10 Foam thickness 5mm/±0.5 1st off/last off

Foam width 10mm/±0.5 1st off/last off

11 Captive nut M6x0.5 Screw gauge

4 12 PP Duct color Black PG05/ΔE1.5 max 100% visual

6 5 10kPa/10sec.
13 Foam adhesion 100% visual
/2kPa/drop
10kPa/10sec
OBD 14 Pressure test 100% Pokayoke
2kPa/drop

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved 1/1


4.4 Engineering Product Specifications / Drawing Study and Completion

Activity Purpose:

 Design the product to achieve Renault / Nissan design goals: performance, function, reliability, durability, structure, shape, weight, service parts
requirements, etc.

Note(s):

Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity  Study and create technical  Implement design change management activity if engineering product
Content specifications specification/drawing content is changed.
 Create the engineering
drawing/ CAD data
 Ensure that manufacturing
constraints are incorporated
into the product design so
that the quality and reliability
target are achieved.
Output  Engineering Product Specifications & Engineering Drawings / CAD data
Document  Supplier Recommendations (Renault)

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number:

 7.1 Planning of product realization (for example: 7.1.4 Change control)


 7.2 Customer-related processes
 7.3 Design and development

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Engineering Product Specification Documents & Engineering Drawings/CAD data

Key Point(s):

 The Engineering Product Specifications and Engineering Drawings/ AD data are the documents that give the product technical description.
 The Engineering Product Specifications are used by the supplier to complete the Engineering Drawing/CAD data, and by Renault/Nissan to make
the product design note.
 The Engineering Drawings/CAD data shall comply with Renault/Nissan Engineering Standards included in the Request for Quotation (RFQ).

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

For Renault
 The minimum requirements are given in 00-10-415 standard.
For Nissan
 3D CAD data (inc. 3D CAD data for assembly or components and supplemental documents)
 Dimensional Specifications
 List of sub components
 Calculation and Simulation Results
 Test Specifications
 Technical design goal
 Special Characteristics
 Key Features
 Material specifications
 Estimated weight (mass data)
 Appearance specification
 Part identification/ marking methods
 Additional regulation specifications (regulatory requirements)
 Applicable NES (Nissan Engineering Standards)

Output Document Description:

 Supplier’s own document, which shall meet Renault / Nissan engineering standards and requirements.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Supplier Recommendations (SR) - (Renault)
Key Point(s):

 The supplier shall give all required information related to the use of the product by the manufacturer or the customer and the potential effect of
disregarding recommendations.
 The supplier shall give all necessary recommendations and banning related to:
 the relation between the product and the other parts it has to be fastened to;
 the environment of the product once fitted in the car;
 transport, storage, packaging and deconditioning of the product;
 rules of process to be observed in fitting on the assembly line, stripping and winding up (in plant, in garage);
 handling by the workers (or robots) on the assembly line or by maintenance agents.
 recommendations and banning will figure efforts, temperatures, surface conditions, geometry, dampness, weights, etc …

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 This document shall include the recommendations for :


 functional use (only for vehicle)
 logistics, deconditioning of the product
 assembly
 operators handling for fitting (including safety risks)
 after-sales (rectification, repair, specific tool to use, …)
 recommendations for driver use

Output Document Description:

 Supplier’s own document

Note:
 Some of the recommendations will be useful for the owner's manual (ex : "Warnings for use")
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
4.5 Special Characteristics Management

Activity Purpose:

 Renault-Nissan require that suppliers of all product/parts with Special Characteristics are able to demonstrate that they are controlling all aspects of
manufacture and that they have incorporated the Special Characteristics Management requirements within their Quality Management Systems.
 The Special Characteristics Management requirements for Renault and Nissan are described separately. Follow the links below to access the
company specific requirements.

Note(s):

 The supplier data (including certification) shall be submitted for the Inspection Item to Renault-Nissan department. (Refer to the DCI (Document
Completion Instruction) of the “Certificate of Certification (COC) & Conformity of Product (COP))
 Renault/Nissan reserves the right at any time to audit the supplier's compliance with these Special Characteristics Management requirements.
 The supplier for electric and electronic system may be required to comply with ISO 26262 (Road vehicles -- Functional safety --) requirements with
Request for Quotation (RFQ).

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number:

 7.2 Customer-related processes


 7.3 Design and development
 7.4 Purchasing (for example; 7.4.1.1 Regulatory conformity)
 7.5 Production and service provision
 8.2 Monitoring and measurement

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Special Characteristics (Renault)

Renault Characteristics classification


The characteristic level and the CSR characteristic will be identified on the relevant spec. tender, or part drawing supplied by Renault as following in the
Renault Norme 01-33-301. The level of each characteristic must be transferred from the drawing onto all relevant documentation, i.e. Drawings, Control
Plans, Process Flow Charts, Part Submission Warrants, Work Instruction Sheets, Training records and any supplier related documents as followed in
the Renault Norme 01-33-301.

Renault Requirements
Renault requires all suppliers of all parts with all characteristics to be able to demonstrate that they are controlling all aspects of manufacture and that
they have incorporated the following requirements within their Quality Assurance Systems.

According to the listing of sales countries of vehicle, the Supplier shall identify the activities to carry out for the parts regarding Regulation, Certification,
"Conformity of Production" control and inform Renault about them.

At each required milestone, during development and mass production, the Supplier shall transmit to Renault the specific certificates and/or the
certification elements (Communication sheet and national certificates) and/or the self-certification elements with the Test Reports, for the parts that are
under the responsibility of the supplier for their own certification (according to each country of sale) and the Conformity of Production control.
These activities and the corresponding Certificates and/or self-Certification Reports and/or Certification Reports shall be included in the document
"Supplier Test Plan and Report".

The supplier must give the demonstration that the Special Characteristics are taken into account in the HCPP, in the Special Characteristics and Key
Features Diagrams, and in the Control Plan to be applied for each trial built.
In particular, the supplier has to consider, in his control plan, all the minimum requirements for COP control for all marketing countries. The car
Manufacturer has to provide these requirements in the RFQ.
The supplier can complete, if necessary, these minimum expectations including all adapted implementations in his control plan (new characteristics,
samples size increase or control frequencies etc...).

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
During mass production, Renault may ask to the Supplier :
- the demonstration that the Control Plan contents all inspections and tests,
- the demonstration of the compliance to the Specified Requirements.

Characteristics CSR
When assigning personnel to the production of parts with CSR characteristics the supplier shall:
 Ensure that all personnel involved CSR operations / tests must be ‘assigned workers’ with training programs which can clearly demonstrate that they
have achieved the required level of knowledge and skill.
 Maintain a record of the personnel responsible for performing activities relating to the Characteristics CSR.

All machines or equipment performing operations or tests on these parts must be clearly identified with the relevant Renault symbol, as shown in the
Renault Standard 00 10 415
Characteristics CSR, level 1 and level 2.
i. All machines or equipment used for the manufacture of these characteristics must receive special attention in the maintenance program.
ii. No change to the product, to the inspection process, to the manufacturing process or manufacturing Site, or Supplier, or internal concessions will be made for
these parts without Renault agreement. This agreement must be obtained prior to shipment of new part issue level. In any case of change, the Supplier shall
identify and submit to Renault any implication regarding Regulation and Certification, and also Safety.
iii. The supplier shall carry out a program of internal process audits. These shall be documented and designed to verify that all process parameters are controlled
and effective. Any follow up actions shall be monitored to confirm effectiveness and where necessary become officially adopted countermeasures.
iv. Where Important characteristics CSR, level 1 or level 2 are subject to the controls of sub-suppliers’ processes, the Renault requirements shall be applied to the
sub-supplier.
v. The supplier must be able to demonstrate assurance of these characteristics.
vi. If any rework is performed on these characteristics to return it to specification, this must be documented and controlled. Approval by the person responsible for
Quality within the Supplier shall be obtained, and records will be retained regarding part identification.
vii. All systems shall reflect the concerns, i.e. non-conforming products (manufacturing or testing), must have a higher reporting route through the organization to
ensure that any corrective actions are implemented and are effective.
viii. On these parts the supplier must have a part traceability procedure as following in the Renault procedure HQFE 013.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
ix. Records relating to production processes and control, including lot control, inspection, test and defect history records shall be held as following in the Renault
Standard 00 10 415.

Requirement on Document Submission


Results of inspection and testing regarding Special characteristics, if required, shall be submitted to RENAULT at the specified frequency. The method
of submission shall be confirmed with RENAULT at the latest on the Pre-Production phase.
Any modification to this submission in either frequency or method must be agreed in advance with RENAULT.
Tier 1 suppliers of Modules and / or Parts are responsible for the management of both their own and any sub-supplier data, including any RENAULT
imposed sub-supplier requirements.
In the case of Module Parts with special characteristics at both Tier 1 and sub-supplier levels, the Tier 1 supplier should provide quality documentation
related to the assurance of special characteristics of both Tier 1 assemblies and sub-supplier's sub-assemblies / parts e.g. Control Plans, Inspection
Reports, Capability Study Data, Supplier test Reports.

Note: The term "Module Part" mentioned in the above refers to a complete functional assembly inclusive of sub-module parts defined by RENAULT part
/ order reference e.g. Cockpit module, Front-end Module, Roof Module etc. Generally, this means a functionally complete part, which composes a
device / machine / system.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Special Characteristics (Nissan)

Nissan Special Characteristics are;


 Important A
 Important B
 Important C
 OBD
 Regulatory

Special Characteristic type, definition and symbol:

 The Special Characteristics shall be identified on the relevant spec tender or part drawing supplied by Nissan.
 The Special Characteristic details must be transferred from the drawing onto all relevant documentation, i.e. Drawings, Control Plans, Process
Flow Charts, Part Submission Warrants, Work Instruction Sheets, Training records and any supplier related documents.
 Detail definition as follows:

Important A

"Important-A parts and areas"


Nomenclature Parts and areas required to maintain the following functions and
Symbol D = φ12mm for use in Important Part Symbol column. parts characteristic required to control manufacturing variation:
D = φ7mm for inclusion elsewhere on drawings or within
other documents 1) Functions to control steering
Definition:
2) Functions to control braking
3) Functions to prevent fuel leaking

Characteristic Nissan requires all suppliers of Important-A parts to comply with the
Identifier A "Square Cornered" box with a solid line to be placed around Special Characteristics Requirements below.
the text describing the characteristic deemed to be important.

Important B

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
"Important-B parts and areas"
Nomenclature Parts and areas required to maintain the following safety regulations
Symbol D = φ12mm for use in Important Part Symbol column. and parts characteristic required to control manufacturing variation:
D = φ7mm for inclusion elsewhere on drawings or within
other documents. 1) To protect occupants and to mitigate injury in a vehicle collision
Definition:
2) To secure safety after accident
3) To give information required for safety assurance during driving

Characteristic Nissan requires all suppliers of Important-B parts to comply with the
Identifier A "Round Cornered" box to be placed around the text Special Characteristics Requirements below.
describing the characteristic deemed to be important.

Important C

"Important-C characteristic"
In order to achieve customers satisfaction, characteristic required to
Nomenclature control manufacturing variation:
Symbol D = φ12mm for use in Important Part Symbol column
D = φ7mm for inclusion elsewhere on drawings or within 1) Parts characteristic required to control variation in order to satisfy
other documents. vehicle performance
Definition:
2) Tightening characteristic to cause malfunction (except
Important-A or B)
3) Harness connecting to cause malfunction (higher than ASIL A)
Characteristic A "Round Cornered" box with a broken line to be placed
Identifier Nissan requires all suppliers of Important-C parts to comply with the
around the text describing the characteristic deemed to be
Special Characteristics Requirements below.
important.

OBD

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Nomenclature OBD - products / parts and characteristics exist where variance from
Symbol Definition: design specification may affect compliance with emissions
& Special Characteristic (Relating regulations.
Characteristic Symbol to be placed next to relevant characteristic. to emissions Regulations) Nissan requires all suppliers of product/part with OBD characteristics
Identifier to comply with the Special Characteristics Requirements below.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Special Characteristics Requirements:

 Nissan requires all suppliers of all product/part with Special characteristics to be able to demonstrate that they are controlling all aspects of
manufacture and that they have incorporated the following requirements within their Quality Assurance Systems. Nissan reserves the right at any
time to audit the supplier's compliance with the characteristics requirements relating to the Special characteristics.
 Sub-supplier Management:
 Where Important characteristics and OBD characteristics are subject to the controls of sub-suppliers' processes, the Nissan Important
product/part and OBD product/part requirements shall be applied to the sub-supplier by the Tier 1 supplier.
 Tier 1 suppliers hold full responsibility for the management and approval of sub-supplier's parts quality and associated documentation. In
cases where the Tier 1 supplier has sub-supplied parts imposed by Nissan, the Tier 1 supplier shall assume the above responsibility from the timing
of the planning for the first pre-production (off tool) trial.
 Quality & Process Capability Target(s):
 The supplier must be able to demonstrate 100% assurance of all Important and OBD characteristics. Process Capabilities target; Each
Important and OBD characteristic must have a process capability index (Cpk) > 1.33.
 Parts Identification control:
 Important product / part and OBD product / part characteristics shall be confirmed by a unique mark, specified by Nissan or pre-agreed with the
customer, on every product / part. This should be detailed on the relevant Drawings, Control Plans, Key Features Diagrams, Work Instruction
Sheets and any other supplier related documents.
 Parts traceability:
 On Important and OBD product/part the supplier must have a lot control / traceability procedure.
 This must allow both fast and accurate lot traceability (target access and search times being within two hours) and should be based on
significant characteristics of manufacture, e.g. date, shift, process assembly, delivery.
 Lot control:
 In the delivery of Important and OBD product/part, the Important or OBD mark shall be noted on Lot Control card (where applicable) which
should be attached to pallets and cases.
 Document Submission:
 Results of inspection and testing regarding Special Characteristics, if required, shall be submitted to Nissan at the specified frequency.
 The method of submission shall be confirmed with the relevant Nissan Quality Department during the Pre-Production phase.
 Any modification to this submission in either frequency or method must be agreed in advance with the relevant Nissan Department.
 Tier 1 suppliers of Modules and/or Parts are responsible for the management of both it and any sub-supplier data, including any Nissan
imposed sub-supplier requirements.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
 In the case of Module Parts with special characteristics at both Tier 1 and sub-supplier levels, the Tier 1 supplier should provide quality
documentation related to the assurance of special characteristics of both Tier 1 assemblies and sub-supplier's sub-assemblies / parts e.g. Control
Plans, Inspection Reports, Capability Study Data, Supplier test Reports.

Note;
The term "Module Part" mentioned in the above refers to a complete functional assembly inclusive of sub-module parts defined by Nissan part /
order reference e.g. Cockpit module, Front-end Module, Roof Module etc. Generally, this means a functionally complete part which composes a
device / machine / system

Important A unique requirements:

 When assigning personnel to the production of Important A product/part the supplier shall:
 Ensure that all personnel involved in Important A operations/tests must be 'assigned workers' with training programs which can clearly
demonstrate that they have achieved the required level of knowledge and skill.
 Maintain a record of the personnel responsible for performing activities relating to Important Characteristics.
 All machines or equipment performing operations or tests on Important A product/part must be clearly identified with the relevant Nissan Important
A symbol, as shown in Section 1 of this Appendix.
 Marking of numbers
 Marking on products
a) Suppliers shall indicate lot numbers on products.
b) Markings shall be either die-stamped or printed etc., so the markings cannot easily be erased. Markings shall, as a rule, be located where
they can be seen easily, when the products are installed on vehicles.
 Marking on a lot card or bar code of delivered products
a) For the product / parts defined by Nissan, as a rule, suppliers shall indicate the lot number on lot card or bar code

Important A, Important B and OBD requirements:

 Internal audit:
 The supplier shall carry out a programme of internal process audits. These shall be documented and designed to verify that all process
parameters are controlled and effective.
 Any follow up actions shall be monitored to confirm effectiveness and where necessary become officially adopted countermeasures.
 Change management:

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
 No alterations to the manufacturing process or internal concessions will be made to an Important A, B or OBD product/part without Nissan
approval.
 This approval must be attained prior to shipment of new level product/part.
 Reworked parts:
 If any rework is performed on an Important A/B or OBD characteristic to return it to specification, this must be documented and controlled.
Approval by the supplier's person responsible for quality shall be obtained.
 Reworked Important and OBD product/part shall be identified by indelible marking and have their characteristic 100% inspected and records
will be retained for product/part identification.
 Concern management:
 All systems shall reflect special characteristics management for Important A/B and OBD product/part concerns, i.e. non-conforming products
(manufacture or test) must have a higher reporting route through the organisation to ensure that any corrective actions are implemented and are
effective.
 Maintenance:
 All machines or equipment used for the manufacture of Important A/B and OBD product/part must receive special attention in the maintenance
program.
 Record(s):
 Record relating to production processes and control, including lot control, inspection, tests and non-conformance history records shall be held
for a specified period. (Refer to the “Ground Rule of Document Submission”)
 Suppliers shall maintain a register which can cross reference lot numbers and manufacturing characteristics to facilitate traceability on request.
 The lot control register should show each product / part, tooling/mold number, dates of manufacture, inspections and delivery, including
quantities.
 Tracing and search of Important "A" product / parts shall be possible for not only the applicable lot number but also quality records.
 Parts routine test:
 Nissan require suppliers to make regular tests on Special Characteristics product/part. The following will be agreed with the relevant Nissan
department during product development, tests to be carried out, frequency of test and the test results feedback to Nissan (if required).

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
List of Control Methods for Important A parts, Important B parts, and Units

Control Method 1. Individual control 2. Lot control 3. Shipping date control


Sample of Component of Component of - Important-A and important-B parts
part/product - Prime bar (engine) - Front axle components delivered from the suppliers.
- Electric motor (motor) *Alternative - Calliper disc rotor - Important-A and important-B parts
- Transmission - Ball joint wheel hub produced at the unit factory
- Steering - Transverse link strut (process).
- Front axle - Extension knuckle arm
- Rear axle - Steering knuckle
- Transfer - Kingpin, wheel bearing
- Airbag - Rear axle components
- LBC (High-voltage battery pack) - Calliper axle tube
- On-board charger - Disc rotor brake drum
- Decelerator - Wheel hub torsion beam
- DC/DC converter, inverter - Brake assembly axle housing
- PBW (park-by-wire) ECU/ACTR - Engine components
- e-PKB (Parking brake) ECU/ACTR
- e-ACT (electric booster)
- PTC (electric) heater
Supplier Assign a serial for each part, and Assign a lot number for each part, and Associate the lot number with the
requirement associate the manufacturing history with associate the manufacturing history with delivery date to Nissan.
the parts and then deliver to Nissan. the parts and then deliver to Nissan.

Numbering Numbers shall be in a 10-digit Basically, numbers shall be in a 7-digit


method combination of alphanumeric characters. combination of alphanumeric characters.
(Guide)
The contents shall be as follows: The contents shall be as follows:
(I) Line number (1st to 3rd digit): (I) Year (1st digit):
(Set at Production Engineering The last digit of the year shall correspond to
Department) 0 to 9.
(II) Line number (4th digit): Supplier (II) Month (2nd digit): January to December

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
manufacturing line shall be associated shall correspond to the numerals from 1 to
with an alphanumeric character. 9, and letters X, Y, and Z.
(III) Manufacturing month (5th digit): (III) Day (3rd and 4th digits): Dates from 1
January to December shall correspond to to 31 shall correspond to the numerals from
the numerals from 1 to 9, and letters X, Y, 01 to 31 or 1 to 31.
and Z. (IV) Supplier ID (5th digit):
(III) Production sequence number (5th to A single alphanumeric character shall be
10th digit): 5-digit serial number with associated with each supplier.
numerals. It shall be reset to “00001” for (V) Other (6th and 7th digits):
each month. These can be used independently by each
supplier.
Note)
- Regarding the barcode specification and
fixing position, confirm with the
Production Engineering Department. Due
to the barcode specification, it may not be
read at a factory.
Record of control  Suppliers shall maintain a register which can cross reference lot numbers and manufacturing characteristics to facilitate
traceability on request.
 The lot control register should show each product / part, tooling/mold number, dates of manufacture, inspections and
delivery, including quantities.
 Tracing and search of Important "A" and Nissan requests product / parts shall be possible for not only the applicable lot
number but also quality records.

 Any modifications to the above must be agreed with the relevant Nissan department.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Certificate of Certification (COC) / Conformity of Production (COP)

Key Point(s):

 For the parts that are under the responsibility of the supplier for their own certification/conformity, Renault-Nissan shall ensure regulatory
compliance of these parts especially when they contribute to the vehicle approval (check of the installation of these parts in the vehicle).
 The certificate of certification, the marking and the inspection record are the evidence of the regulatory conformity of these parts.
 The supplier shall provide Renault-Nissan the certificates, marked parts and the inspection record in accordance with the project schedule.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The supplier shall:


 Realize all activities for certification/conformity concerning all parts with certification/conformity characteristics (according to each country of
sale) under the direct responsibility of the supplier.
 Contact Renault/Nissan before Phase 3 (Off-tool) activities to confirm the actions required to comply with homologation/certification (according
to each country of sale).
 Submit to Renault/Nissan “the specific certificates and/or the certification elements (Communication sheet and national certificates) and/or the
self-certification elements with the Test Reports, for the parts that are under the responsibility of the supplier for their own
certification/conformity (according to each country of sale)”.
 The supplier to ensure the validity and readability of sent documents such as the inspection record periodically both during pre-production trials and
throughout series production.
 To comply with certification/conformity (according to each country of sale), the supplier shall be identified special characteristics by an asterisk
(*) (unless Renault-Nissan specified other identification) in the Special Characteristic identification column of the relevant Control Plan and the
Special Characteristics and Key Feature Diagram.
 The certificate of certification (communication sheet & national certificates according to sales countries) of these parts must:
 be accompanied by tests reports
 be readable and understandable by Renault-Nissan
 be currently valid
 updated and submitted, in case of evolution (regulation, new country of sale, technical modification of the parts, change of corporate name, ...)
and in case of date exceeded validity.
 To comply with certification/conformity, the supplier shall submit inspection data periodically to Renault-Nissan following the production conformity
requirements provided by Renault-Nissan. The tier 1 supplier of module and/or part is responsible for the management of it and any sub-supplier
(component) data; including any the Renault-Nissan imposed sub-supplier/component.
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
 The part shall be marked according to the regulatory texts. The certification number of these parts shall be marked on the parts which are provided
to Renault-Nissan in project development and during current life.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
5. MANUFACTURING PROCESS DEVELOPMENT

Category Purpose:

Design a manufacturing process to meet the Renault-Nissan requirements;


 Ensure that the manufacturing process will be capable of producing the required product quality level
 Ensure that the manufacturing process will be capable of producing the required quantity of product

Element Activity:

 5.1 Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis


 5.2 Manufacturing Process Design
 5.3 Tooling, Gauges and Facility Management
 5.4 Process Capability Study and Improvement
 5.5 Confirmation of Full Volume Conditions
 5.6 Activities during Ramp-up
 5.7 Identification and Traceability

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Process Potential FMEA

Key Point(s):

 A Process Potential FMEA is an analytical technic used by a cross-functional team to ensure that all potential failure modes and their associated
causes have been identified and countermeasured. Complete assemblies, along with every related system, subassembly and component should
be evaluated.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 Follow the guidelines described in the Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis manual (latest edition)
and ensure that the Renault / Nissan specific requirements listed below are also included

Item Specific Requirement


The name of the process being analyzed in detail.
Process Function
All processes should be considered (including inspection etc.)
Describe the process function (role and function to be essentially fulfilled) of the items. If the item has more
Requirement
than one function, describe each function in parallel.
Anticipate and describe all possible ways the process could fail to meet the process requirements and/or the
Potential Failure Mode design intent, not how it will fail. When describing the failure mode, avoid using non-specific terms such as
'damage' etc.
Describe the effects of the failure in terms of what the customer (both external and internal) might notice or
experience. The supplier must contact Nissan in order to fully understand the functional relationship between
Potential Effect(s) of Failure
the item being analyzed and other vehicle parts/ systems. The effect(s) of the failure on these functional
relationships must be considered.

Potential Cause(s)/Mechanism(s) of
List every potential cause and/or failure mechanism for each failure mode.
Failure

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Current Process Controls Describe the control method which has been applied in the past or is planned to be applied in the future,
(Prevention / Detection) against the specified failure mode or assumed cause/ mechanism

Study and describe the recommended action from the view of Design/ Evaluation/ Manufacturing departments,
according to the result of risk priority
Recommended Action
e.g.) Specification Change, Data collection by the confirmation of experiment evaluation or phenomenon, and
Study the action in manufacturing engineering and manufacturing process control, etc.

 The supplier should use the 5W1H (What, Where, When, Why, Who and How) analysis technique to help fully describe every potential failure
mode.
 The supplier must ensure consistency throughout all documentation (e.g.: Control plan, Process Flow Chart , Special Characteristic and Key
Features Diagram, Inspection Report, FMEA) for;
 operation step numbering
 product characteristics identification

For Renault:
 Unless otherwise agreed with Renault, the Supplier shall study and provide a "Manufacturing Process FMEA" (which includes Process FMEA,
Production Facility FMEA, Flow FMEA).
 The Supplier shall use his own standard for FMEA evaluation or, by default; the Supplier shall use the Renault standard 01-33-200.
 The supplier shall take into account the EIC "Evénements Indésirables Client"/ Feared Events (sent by Renault) when conducting this analysis.

Output Document Description:

For Renault:
 Supplier own document

For Nissan:
 The supplier shall use the Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) recommended format or Supplier own document (provided that it complies with
AIAG requirements) and shall include the above minimum content requirements.
 When using the Nissan provided PFMEA format, ensure that the header is completed as described below.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Item Completion Instructions
R / N Project Renault or Nissan Vehicle / Power train project for which the product is being developed /
manufactured.
Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed / manufactured.
Renault - CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Document Reference No./ Version The Suppliers reference no. and version no. for the document.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name Supplier Company name.
Supplier Plant Location at which the product will be produced.
Supplier Code Unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault / Nissan Purchasing Dept.
Author The name of the person who created / revised the document
E-mail The E-mail address of the person who created / revised the document.
Tel The telephone number of the person who created / revised the document
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing
Part No. & Issue Level: As issued by Renault / Nissan design department
Design Note No. / DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed / manufactured.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
5.2 Manufacturing Process Design

Activity Purpose:

 Design a manufacturing process to achieve all Renault-Nissan targets.

Notes:

 The supplier shall provide a means to verify quality characteristics specified on the document such as Control Plan and Work Instruction.
 The supplier shall develop, utilize, and maintain the required inspection related tools such as checking fixtures, gages, or other inspection/test
equipment. The confirmation frequency for these items shall be listed on the documents.
 Frequencies should be set according to the duration of the test, the importance of the test and the way in which this characteristic is determined
and controlled. (Refer to the Supplier Test Plan and Report on “6.1 Design Verification and Product / Process Validation”)
 The inspection standard shall consider and include inspection related criteria as indicated on PFEMA studies, etc., and the identified frequency of
inspection must be developed from process capability studies and results.
 Sampling frequencies shall be specific to the inspection item being defined. (Three time per shift etc.)
 In order to achieve targets, the supplier shall incorporate poka-yoke (error-proofing) devices in their manufacturing process. The purpose of these
error proofing devices is either:
 Do not make non-conforming part (e.g. prevent operational error)
 Do not pass non-conforming part (e.g. detect operational error)

Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity  Study and create the process flow.  Develop work instructions for all operations based
Content  Define the physical location of all facilities and on the content of the Control Plan
material locations.  Train all operators based on the work instructions
 Define the control  Define the  Review the process  Apply the change
methods associated with manufacturing control flow based on the management activity
prototype parts. methods and related result of off-tool trials. before any change.
 Commence initial study operations associated  Define the
of control methods with pre-production manufacturing control
associated with parts. methods associated
pre-production parts. with production parts.
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
 Review the
manufacturing control
methods based on the
result of off-tool trials.
Output  Process Flow Chart
Document  Floor Plan Layout
 Control Plan
 Work Instruction
 MQA (Renault)

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number:

 7.3 Design and development


 7.5 Production and service provision
 7.6 Control of monitoring and measuring devices.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Control Plan (CP)

Key Point(s):

 The Control plan is the description of all Product and Process control operations implemented in the production process. It is a living document and
shall reflect the manufacturing process and control systems at all times.
 「Control Plans form a central part of the Supplier's overall process to achieve Renault and / or Nissan's requirements for Quality, Cost and Delivery.
 In accordance with ISO/TS 16949, there are 3 stages of control plan used during the ANPQP phases:
 The Prototype Control Plan:
 A Prototype Control Plan is a description of the dimensional measurements material and performance tests that will occur during manufacture
of the prototype part.
Note: For Renault, the submission of a prototype control plan is not mandatory.
 The Pre-Launch Control plan:
 A Pre-Launch Control Plan is a description of the product/ process controls, dimensional measurements, material and performance tests that
occur after prototype and before full production.
 The Pre-Launch control plan covers the ramp-up period and should include additional product/ process controls to be implemented until the
production process is validated e.g. reinforced controls, firewalls, containment etc.
 The Production Control plan:
 Production Control Plan is a description of the product/ process controls, dimensional measurements, material and performance tests that
occur during mass production.
 The production control plan is a logical evolution of the pre-production control plan.
 The production control plan shall not be implemented until the exit criteria of ramp-up are achieved.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The Control plan shall include:


 Identification of all Special Characteristics and Key Features, with suitable control methods and appropriate check frequency*.
*Note)
In case of sampling inspection, supplier shall conduct article inspection after changeover and at least 3 time (first, middle and end) article
inspection per one shift.
 Identification of process characteristics.
Note: In some processes one process characteristic may affect several product characteristics e.g. temperature, pressure, time, etc.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
for injection moulding process. Temperature, current, voltage, pressure, etc. for welding process
 Identification of all other features to be checked according to contracted requirements.
 The production and process control operations mentioned in the Process flow chart, including rework and repair, storage, "cleanliness"
operations if applicable,
 The calibration/ maintenance of all control means and the check of the error proofing (poka-yoke) devices
 Details of reaction plans

 Special Characteristics and Key Features Diagram shall accompany the Control Plan.

 The supplier must ensure consistency throughout all documentation (e.g.: Control plan, Process Flow Chart , Special Characteristic and Key
Features Diagram, Inspection Report, FMEA) for:
 operation step numbering
 product characteristics identification

Output Document Description:

Item Completion Instructions


Prototype Tick this box if this is a Prototype Control Plan
Pre-Production / Pre-Launch Tick this box if this is a Pre-Launch Control Plan
Production Tick this box if this is a Production Control Plan
R / N Project Renault or Nissan Vehicle / Power train project for which the part is being developed / manufactured.
Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed / manufactured.
Renault - CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Document Reference No./ Version The Suppliers reference no. and version no. for the document.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name Supplier Company name.
Supplier Plant Location at which the product will be produced.
Note:
If the site supplying off-tool parts for a trial build is different to that supplying off-process part for
a later trial, this should be discussed with Renault-Nissan and should be reflected in all project
management documentation.
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Supplier Code Unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault-Nissan Purchasing Dept.
Author The name of the person who created / revised the document.
E-mail The E-mail address of the person who created / revised the document.
Tel The telephone number of the person who created / revised the document.
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing.
Part No. & Issue Level: As issued by Renault-Nissan design department.
Design Note No. / DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed / manufactured.
Supplier Approval The name and signature of the person approving the Control Plan.
Date The Control Plan approval date.
Dept The department in which the above signatory works.
Renault-Nissan Acknowledgement The name and signature of the Renault-Nissan person who acknowledges receipt of the Control Plan.
Date The date of the Renault-Nissan acknowledgement.
Process No and Process description The process step number and description taken from the Process Flow Chart.
Machine, Device, Jig, Tools for Mfg The name of the processing equipment including any identification reference.
No. Characteristic Number as identified in the Special Characteristics and Key Features Diagram
Product Characteristics are the features or properties of a part, component or assembly that are described
Product
on engineering documents e.g. drawings, specifications or other engineering information.
Characteristics
Process characteristics are manufacturing process parameters that have an effect on product
Process characteristics. These parameters must be identified and controlled to ensure product conformity and
minimize product variation.
Characteristic Class according to the Special Characteristics and Key Features Diagram.
NISSAN Special Characteristics Identification:

Important A Important B Important C OBD


Special Char. / Key Feature Ident’n
(Special Characteristic / Key Feature Identification)

Renault Special Characteristics Identification:


CSR

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Key Features Identification:
The Supplier's own identification symbol should be used unless otherwise specified by Renault-Nissan.
Note:
Key Features shall include features affecting type approval (homologation, certification and regulation) not
included in Special Characteristics.
Specifications/ tolerances may be obtained from various engineering documents, such as, but not limited
Specification / Tolerance to, drawings, design reviews, material standard, computer-aided design data, manufacturing, and/or
assembly requirements.
The measuring system that will be used to confirm the specification or tolerance
Evaluation / measurement technique This system includes gauges, fixtures, tools, and/ or test equipment required to measure the part/ process/
manufacturing equipment.
Sample Size & Freq’cy For each activity, the amount of product to be sampled and the frequency the activity will be carried out.
This column contains a brief description or reference for how the result of the evaluation and measurement
Methods Control Method
will be controlled.
Any maintenance and calibration activities of equipment, gauges, tools and dies that take place as part of
Maintenance the normal process (e.g. Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) activities). If the supplier has a maintenance
activity standard, the standard number should be specified.
Poka Yoke Describes any error proofing activities incorporated into the process.
Reaction Plan Supplier countermeasure action plan

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Example of Renault Important Part

ANPQP - CONTROL PLAN

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.

Process Characteristics Spec.Char. Methods


Machine, Device,
/ Key Specification / Evaluation / Sample
Jig, Tools for Maintenance Poka Yoke Reaction Plan
No. Description No. Product Process Feature Tolerance Measurement Control Method
Mfg. Size Freq'cy
Ident'n Technique
Incoming Inspection
Incoming Follow actions defined in
Incoming
Material material each inspection "Non-conforming
1 Inspection for Visual inspection 1x
certificate specification batch Standard Product Management"
Raw Material 0035 Procedure
Ref 080956 -
- no damages
- bulb and
connector pins
Incoming Follow actions defined in
Incoming not damaged
Master Sample Visual each Inspection "Non-conforming
2 Inspection for - shape of Visual inspection 1x
n°10 conformity batch Standard Product Management"
Bulbholder electrical paths
Ref 056743 0035 Procedure
Conformity with
Master Sample n°
10
Incoming Follow actions defined in
Drawing & Inspection
Diameters of each Inspection "Non-conforming
Control plan for report from 1x
seals batch Standard Product Management"
Bulb supplier 0035 Procedure
Ref 056743

Incoming Follow actions defined in


-No loose Tentacle 1 each Inspection "Non-conforming
Gauge Assembly
-No tight inspection parts batch Standard Product Management"
Ref 056743 0035 Procedure

- identification
- color conform to
Incoming Follow actions defined in
master
Master Sample Visual 2 each Inspection "Non-conforming
3 Metal screw B1 - no rust Visual inspection
n° 20 conformity parts batch Standard Product Management"
Conformity to
Ref 073247 0035 Procedure
Master Sample n°
20

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Example of Renault Important Part

ANPQP - CONTROL PLAN

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.

Process Characteristics Spec.Char. Methods


Machine, Device,
/ Key Specification / Evaluation / Sample
Jig, Tools for Maintenance Poka Yoke Reaction Plan
No. Description No. Product Process Feature Tolerance Measurement Control Method
Mfg. Size Freq'cy
Ident'n Technique

- identification
- no damages Incoming Follow actions defined in
Incoming - good shape
Master Sample Apperance, 5 each Inspection "Non-conforming
4 Inspection for - glue presence Visual inspection
n°30 Shape - no loss of material
parts batch Standard Product Management"
Seal 0035 Procedure
Conformity to Ref 167845
Master Sample n°30

- bulb identification Incoming


Incoming - no damages Follow actions defined in
Inspection
Inspection for Apperance Conformity to 20 each "Non-conforming
5 Visual inspection Standard for
Bulb Incoming Inspection parts batch Product Management"
Standard for bulbs bulbs 0035 Procedure
A0010/20/30
Ref 578400 Ref 578400

Incoming
Part fits Follow actions defined in
Visual and Inspection
correctly 5 each "Non-conforming
Gauge Assembly tentacle Standard for
according to parts batch Product Management"
inspection bulbs 0035 Procedure
gauge spec.
Ref 578400

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Example of Renault Important Part

ANPQP - CONTROL PLAN

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S Doc Ref. No. / Ver.:
1 THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.

Process Characteristics Spec.Char. Methods


Machine, Device,
/ Key Specification / Evaluation / Sample
Jig, Tools for Maintenance Poka Yoke Reaction Plan
No. Description No. Product Process Feature Tolerance Measurement Control Method
Mfg. Size Freq'cy
Ident'n Technique
- no flow lines
- no flash Conformity with
- clips formed accord. to picture in Follow actions defined in
Incoming correctly Inspection
each Incoming "Non-conforming
6 Inspection for Apprance - no damages Visual inspection Standard
Conformity with Ref batch Inspection Product Management"
Housing check 688000 0035 Procedure
picture in Incoming Standard Ref
Inspection Standard 688000
Ref 688000
Conformity with
Part fits accord. to picture in Follow actions defined in
Visual and
correctly Inspection
each Incoming "Non-conforming
Gauge Assembly tentacle Standard
according to Ref batch Inspection Product Management"
inspection 688000 Standard Ref 0035 Procedure
gauge spec.
688000

Follow actions defined in


Incoming -No Visual inspection
20 each "Non-conforming
7 Inspection for 11-b appearance 2 contamination Visual inspection standard 788990
parts batch Product Management"
reflector -No bubble 0035 Procedure

Left: -1 +/-0,3 1 right Follow actions defined in


Measurement
mm Gauge + digital part each "Non-conforming
Gauge 11-c length 3 instruction
Right: -6 +/-0,5 indicator 1 left batch Product Management"
part
967533 0035 Procedure
mm

Incoming Follow actions defined in


apperance Inspection
Control plan for each Inspection "Non-conforming
dimension report from 1x
reflector batch Standard Product Management"
weight supplier 0035 Procedure
Ref 056743

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Example of Renault Important Part

ANPQP - CONTROL PLAN

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S Doc Ref. No. / Ver.:
1 THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.

Process Characteristics Spec.Char. Methods


Machine, Device,
/ Key Specification / Evaluation / Sample
Jig, Tools for Maintenance Poka Yoke Reaction Plan
No. Description No. Product Process Feature Tolerance Measurement Control Method
Mfg. Size Freq'cy
Ident'n Technique
Raw material drying
Right material Replace wrong material
Every raw
Raw Material - identification Identification with correct one -> Follow
8 12 3 and color of raw Visual inspection 1x material
drying - color
change sheet AA33 actions defined in
material Procedure 0045

Adjust according Adjust parameters


Drying min. 50° start of Identification
Dryer system 12 3 Automatically 1x to calibration according to Procedure
temperature max. 70° each shift sheet AA33
procedure HH 0045.

Adjust parameters
start of Identification
Dryer system 12 Drying time 3 min. 1h Automatically 1x each shift
according to Procedure
sheet AA33
0045.
Lens injection
every
start of
shift and Inform Supervisor to
Control of upon Identification
9 Lens injection Injection press 10-a 2 Right material Visual inspection 1x Replace wrong
material reference sheet AA37
change material with correct
and every
5 hours

-Temperature calibration Set correct parameters


Injection -Time start of Injection
according to or stop the machine,
process set in compliance Automatically 1x each Parameters
with Injection calibration call for the unit
parameters shift Sheet responsible
Parameters Sheet procedure HH

start of Adjust parameters of


Left: 0,1 +/-0,2 1 right each shift calibration injection machine or
and upon
mm Gauge + digital part according to stop the machine, call
Gauge 10-b Lens length 3 reference X-R control chart
Right: 0,1 +/- indicator 1 left change calibration for the unit responsible.
0,2 mm part and every procedure HH According to Procedure
5 h. 0045.

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Example of Renault Important Part

ANPQP - CONTROL PLAN

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S Doc Ref. No. / Ver.:
1 THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.

Process Characteristics Spec.Char. Methods


Machine, Device,
/ Key Specification / Evaluation / Sample
Jig, Tools for Maintenance Poka Yoke Reaction Plan
No. Description No. Product Process Feature Tolerance Measurement Control Method
Mfg. Size Freq'cy
Ident'n Technique

Adjust parameters of
Left: 100 +/-5g Measurement Adjust according Auto-reject injection machine or stop
each
Digital balance 10-c Lens weight 3 Right: 100 +/- Digital balance 100% instruction to spec. start of function for out the machine, call for the
part unit responsible. According
5g 967533 every shift of spec.
to Procedure 0045.

-No damage
-No flow mark Visual inspection
Lens each Follow actions defined
10-d 2 -No weld mark Visual inspection 100% standard 788990
appearance part in Procedure 0045
-No distortion
-No burr

1 every
piece start of Replace wrong material
AAA
Lens Trichromatic AAA colorimetry right shift and with correct one ->
colorimetry 10-e Check sheet
colorimetry R coordinates OK machine 1 upon Follow actions defined in
machine piece reference Procedure 0045
left change

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Example of Renault Important Part

ANPQP - CONTROL PLAN

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S Doc Ref. No. / Ver.:
1 THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.

Process Characteristics Spec.Char. Methods


Machine, Device,
/ Key Specification / Evaluation / Sample
Jig, Tools for Maintenance Poka Yoke Reaction Plan
No. Description No. Product Process Feature Tolerance Measurement Control Method
Mfg. Size Freq'cy
Ident'n Technique
Assembly
- Lack of damages
Housing - No scratches each Visual inspection Follow actions defined
10 Housing check 9 2 Visual inspection 100%
appearance - Fitting latches part standard 002452 in Procedure 0045
correctly formed

Contaminatio Vacuum
Air pressure each Visual inspection Follow actions defined
11 Reflector check 11-b n vacuum of 2 Pressure meter 100% pressure by
0.5±0.05MPa part standard 002452 in Procedure 0045
Reflector Daily TPM

- No damaged
Inspection
Reflector - No scratches each Visual inspection Follow actions defined
area,illuminatio 11-b 2 Visual inspection 100%
appearance - No part standard 002452 in Procedure 0045
n
contaminations
According to the
Metalic each Follow actions defined
12 Metalic check 3 3 No damages Visual inspection 100% list of components
appearance part in Procedure 0045
CC
-temperature calibration Stop the machine, call
Start of Process Maintenance Responsible
-temperature 250±10℃ Automatically + according to
13 Welding Welding station 20 2 1x each Parameters for problem detection, set
- time - time Visually calibration correct parameters and
shift Monitoring Sheet
3±0.5sec procedure HH restart.
When
Compliant start of
Lens According to the
component shift and Replace wrong
reference Visual inspection 1x list of components
reference upon components
check reference CC
number
change

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Example of Renault Important Part

ANPQP - CONTROL PLAN

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S Doc Ref. No. / Ver.:
1 THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.

Process Characteristics Spec.Char. Methods


Machine, Device,
/ Key Specification / Evaluation / Sample
Jig, Tools for Maintenance Poka Yoke Reaction Plan
No. Description No. Product Process Feature Tolerance Measurement Control Method
Mfg. Size Freq'cy
Ident'n Technique
Contaminatio Vacuum
Air pressure each Visual inspection Follow actions defined
14 Lens check n vacuum of 2 Pressure meter 100% pressure by
0.5±0.05MPa part standard 002452 in Procedure 0045
Reflector Daily TPM

- no damage
Inspection - no scratches
Lens each Visual inspection Follow actions defined
area,illuminatio 10 2 - no black points Visual inspection 100%
Appearance - no white point part standard 002452 in Procedure 0045
n
- no contamination

Automaticaly Automaticaly
Metalic insert Presence of each Follow actions defined
Poka yoke 3 3 Automatically 100% inspection (Poka rejection with
presence metalic insert part in Procedure 0045
Yoke) sensor

Automaticaly Automaticaly
Clipping each Follow actions defined
Poka yoke 13 3 All clips cliped Automatically 100% inspection (Poka rejection with
control part in Procedure 0045
Yoke) sensor

Assembled - No damages during


each Visual inspection Follow actions defined
20 housing check
2 welding process Visual inspection 100%
- Continuous welding line part standard 002452 in Procedure 0045
When
Compliant start of
Components Bulb A0010 According to the
component shift and Replace wrong
15 Bulbs assembly assembly reference Visual inspection 1x list of
reference upon components
station check reference components CC
number
change

Appearance of - No damages each Visual inspection Follow actions defined in


6 Bulb A0010
3 Visual inspection 100%
- No cracks part standard 002452 Procedure 0045

When
Compliant start of
Bulb A0020 According to the
component shift and Replace wrong
reference Visual inspection 1x list of components
reference upon components
check reference CC
number
change

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Example of Renault Important Part

ANPQP - CONTROL PLAN

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S Doc Ref. No. / Ver.:
1 THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.

Process Characteristics Spec.Char. Methods


Machine, Device,
/ Key Specification / Evaluation / Sample
Jig, Tools for Maintenance Poka Yoke Reaction Plan
No. Description No. Product Process Feature Tolerance Measurement Control Method
Mfg. Size Freq'cy
Ident'n Technique
Appearance of - No damages each Visual inspection Follow actions defined in
6 Bulb A0020
3 Visual inspection 100%
- No cracks part standard 002452 Procedure 0045

When
Compliant start of
Bulb A0030 According to the
component shift and Replace wrong
reference Visual inspection 1x list of components
reference upon components
check reference CC
number
change

Appearance of - No damages each Visual inspection Follow actions defined in


8 Bulb A0030
3 Visual inspection 100%
- No cracks part standard 002452 Procedure 0045

When
Compliant start of
Bulbholder According to the
component shift and Replace wrong
reference Visual inspection 1x list of components
reference upon components
check reference CC
number
change

Visual conformity:
- no damages
- bulb and connector
pins not damaged
Appearance each Visual inspection Follow actions defined in
1 3 and deformed Visual inspection 100%
of Bulbholder - all plastic pins part standard 002452 Procedure 0045
heated
- good shape of
electrical paths

Bulbs correctly Visual and tentacle


Assembled Visual and tentacle each Follow actions defined in
21 Assembly 2 assemblied in 100% inspection standard
conditions bulbholder
inspection part 006215
Procedure 0045

When
Compliant start of
Seal According to the
component shift and Follow actions defined in
reference Visual inspection 1x list of components
reference upon Procedure 0045
check reference CC
number
change

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Example of Renault Important Part

ANPQP - CONTROL PLAN

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S Doc Ref. No. / Ver.:
1 THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.

Process Characteristics Spec.Char. Methods


Machine, Device,
/ Key Specification / Evaluation / Sample
Jig, Tools for Maintenance Poka Yoke Reaction Plan
No. Description No. Product Process Feature Tolerance Measurement Control Method
Mfg. Size Freq'cy
Ident'n Technique
Appearance - no damages each Visual inspection Follow actions defined in
5 3 Visual inspection 100%
of seal - good shape part standard 002452 Procedure 0045
Visual and tentacle
Bulbholder Assembled Bulbholder properly Visual and tentacle each Follow actions defined in
16 Assembly 100% inspection standard
assembly conditions mounted in housing inspection part 006215
Procedure 0045

Seal properly each Work instraction Follow actions defined in


17 Seal assembly 21 2 mounted in housing
Manually 100%
part 001488 Procedure 0045

Compliant According to the


Metal screw B1 Reference each Replace wrong
18 component Visual inspection 1x list of components
Assembly check part components
reference number CC

- No damages
each Visual inspection Follow actions defined in
5 Appearance 3 - No rust Visual inspection 100%
- good thread part standard 002452 Procedure 0045

Torque Calibration of torque


screwing each meter accorfing to Torque controled Follow actions defined
controled 5-b 3 4±0,5 Nm Automatically 100% Check sheet
torque part calibration procedure wrench in Procedure 0045
wrench HH

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Example of Renault Important Part

ANPQP - CONTROL PLAN

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S Doc Ref. No. / Ver.:
1 THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.

Process Characteristics Spec.Char. Methods


Machine, Device,
/ Key Specification / Evaluation / Sample
Jig, Tools for Maintenance Poka Yoke Reaction Plan
No. Description No. Product Process Feature Tolerance Measurement Control Method
Mfg. Size Freq'cy
Ident'n Technique
Test
Stop the machine, call
leak inferior to the
Maintenance Responsible
Waterproof limit of pressure xx each see test Pressure
19 Leak test Leak tester 14 2 Automatically 100% for problem detection, set
(leakage) (see test part specifications detection correct parameters and
specifications)
restart.

Measurement in
Check of
ECE dark room/ each ECE Stop the machine, call Maintenance
20 Photometric Test Photometer 18 photometry 100% Responsible for problem detection,
Requirements Automatic part Requirements set correct parameters and restart.
performance R
machine
Functionality test Automaticaly
bulb compliant to each Follow actions defined in
21 (including 15 Stop light 2 Automatically 100% inspection (Poka light functionality
specifications part Procedure 0045
electrical Yoke)
Automaticaly
bulb compliant to each Follow actions defined in
16 Tail light 2 Automatically 100% inspection (Poka light functionality
specifications part Procedure 0045
Yoke)
Automaticaly
bulb compliant to each Follow actions defined in
17 Turn light 2 Automatically 100% inspection (Poka light functionality
specifications part Procedure 0045
Yoke)
Appearance
Final appearance final inspection Compliance to each Visual inspection Follow actions defined in
22 30-a of assembled 2 Visual inspection 100%
check station specifications part standard 002452 Procedure 0045
part

External
Dimensional dimensions Compliance to Gauge + digital 5 each Adjust welding
23 Gauge 30-b 2 X-R control chart
check of Assembled specifications indicator parts shift parameters
part

Reference indicated reading and


Automaticaly
Labelling in the label each Follow actions defined in
24 Labelling check Poka-yoke Automatically 100% inspection (Poka control of
compliance compliant with the part Procedure 0045
requirements Yoke) labelling

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Example of Renault Important Part

ANPQP - CONTROL PLAN

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S Doc Ref. No. / Ver.:
1 THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.

Process Characteristics Spec.Char. Methods


Machine, Device,
/ Key Specification / Evaluation / Sample
Jig, Tools for Maintenance Poka Yoke Reaction Plan
No. Description No. Product Process Feature Tolerance Measurement Control Method
Mfg. Size Freq'cy
Ident'n Technique
Packaging
Compliance to Replace the wrong
Packaging each Packaging
25 Packaging packaging Visual inspection 100% packaging by the right
compliance part standard 645334
specifications one
Serial Tests
Contact Quality Manager -
Resistance to Conformity according to test every 3
26 Regular Test Heat chamber 1 set Test report Follow actions defined in
heat check specifications months Procedure 0045

Contact Quality Manager -


Humidity Resistance to Conformity according to test every 3
1 set Test report Follow actions defined in
chamber humidity check specifications months Procedure 0045

Contact Quality Manager -


Vibration Vibration Conformity according to test every 3
1 set Test report Follow actions defined in
machine Test check specifications months Procedure 0045

Contact Quality Manager -


Photometric ECE according to test every 2 ECE
Photometer 1 set Follow actions defined in
Test R Requirements specifications months Requirements Procedure 0045

Resistance to Contact Quality Manager -


High pressure Conformity according to test every 3
cleaning machine
high pressure 1 set Test report Follow actions defined in
cleaning check specifications months Procedure 0045

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Example of Nissan Important Part

ANPQP - CONTROL PLAN

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: 123456 / Ver.2
521 Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/5/6
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2011/1/6
Supplier Plant: Top Parts Supplier Code: A468 Tel: fmer@topp.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Tokyo, Japan Author: F. Mercury Tel: +81-49-456-7890
Part Name: Tank Supplier Approval: S O Else R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 54010 BU00 Date: 2011/5/6 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/5/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: HEB - 66X Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.

Process Characteristics Spec.Char. Methods


Machine, Device,
/ Key Specification / Evaluation / Sample
Jig, Tools for Maintenance Poka Yoke Reaction Plan
No. Description No. Product Process Feature Tolerance Measurement Control Method
Mfg. Size Freq'cy
Ident'n Technique
Mid steel bracket Gauge = 2.00mm Incoming
Material gauge & Inspection report
1a -Material 11 Characteristi-cs
+/- 0.05mm inspection data 5 Per Lot Return to Supplier
Spec = BS1449CR1 of sub supplier
Receiving confirmation

Tank body - Material Incoming


Inspection report
1b Material 9 Characteristi- Spec = TTR22 inspection data 1 Per Lot Return to Supplier
of sub supplier
Receiving cs confirmation

Reinforcer - Gauge = Incoming 100%


Material Inspection report Up/Downstream check &
1c Material 10 5.00mm +/- inspection data Cpk Per Lot
Gauge of sub supplier Return to Supplier & inform
Receiving 0.05mm confirmation customer

Stamping Die Hole ID = 85.00mm Production 5 Per X-R control Monthly Tool 100%
2 Pierce Reinforcer 21
(13~19) Wear 84 +/- 0 Slide Caliper Per Lot Check Sheet
Weld teardown Adjust process & back
Sub-Assenble
Welder 307 & Weld Check must pull Production Per Check all 1hour stock
bracket to 17 1 Check Sheet
Jig 5083 Storength slug of 6.00mm Vernier Hour to last 5 consecutive
3 Reinforcer diameter min. OK results
Spot Weld Current Value Weekly Welder
Ammeter Per Lot Control Chart
W12059 range 8~10kA TPM
Production
15 Black ED Film build 15~25mm Adjust process and
Elcometer Per
4 Paint Bracket ED Plant 2 coating of 1 Check Sheet back check to last OK
Production Hour
14 Reinforcer Hardness HB result
pencil test

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Example of Nissan Important Part

ANPQP - CONTROL PLAN

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: 123456 / Ver.2
521 Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/5/6
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2011/1/6
Supplier Plant: Top Parts Supplier Code: A468 Tel: fmer@topp.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Tokyo, Japan Author: F. Mercury Tel: +81-49-456-7890
Part Name: Tank Supplier Approval: S O Else R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 54010 BU00 Date: 2011/5/6 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/5/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: HEB - 66X Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.

Process Characteristics Spec.Char. Methods


Machine, Device,
/ Key Specification / Evaluation / Sample
Jig, Tools for Maintenance Poka Yoke Reaction Plan
No. Description No. Product Process Feature Tolerance Measurement Control Method
Mfg. Size Freq'cy
Ident'n Technique
Free from
blemishes to
Production Daily audit Rework to procedure
12 Appearance standerd RN24. all 100%
visual inspection overcheck record REW547 or scrap
Flash not to
exceed 1.50mm

100%
Tank Weld Burst pressure Production test First & Last off Lab report and
16 Up/Downstream check &
Strength lass than 2 bar rig every shift review inform customer

10.0mm +/-
1 Flange width Adjust process and
0.5mm Per X-R control
Inspection CMM 5 back check to last OK
50.0mm +/- Hour Chart
Moulder #3 Die 2 Help positon result
5 Plastic Moulding 1.0mm
#126
Adjust process and
Hole 85.0mm +/- Per X-R control
3 Inspection CMM 5 back check to last OK
diameter 0.5mm Hour Chart
result

Production gauge
- identification 100.0mm +/- #61Production First & Last off 100% back check
4 - color
Check Sheet
1.0mm gauge every shift and containment
#61

Adjust process and


10.0mm +/- Per X-R control
5 Flange width Inspection CMM 5 back check to last OK
0.5mm Hour Chart
result

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Example of Nissan Important Part

ANPQP - CONTROL PLAN

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: 123456 / Ver.2
521 Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/5/6
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2011/1/6
Supplier Plant: Top Parts Supplier Code: A468 Tel: fmer@topp.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Tokyo, Japan Author: F. Mercury Tel: +81-49-456-7890
Part Name: Tank Supplier Approval: S O Else R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 54010 BU00 Date: 2011/5/6 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/5/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: HEB - 66X Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.

Process Characteristics Spec.Char. Methods


Machine, Device,
/ Key Specification / Evaluation / Sample
Jig, Tools for Maintenance Poka Yoke Reaction Plan
No. Description No. Product Process Feature Tolerance Measurement Control Method
Mfg. Size Freq'cy
Ident'n Technique
75.0mm +/-
Sub 6 Vent position Inspection CMM Rework to
Moulder #43 1.0mm Per X-R control
6 assemble Production 5 procedure
Die #127 80.0mm +/- Hour Chart
vent to tank 7 Vent position gauge REW548 or scrap
1.1mm
#61
Production test
Important
A No leakage at rig 100% inprocess
part & OBD
30kPa for 30 and Quality all 100% test
confirmation Air tightness Start / Finish
seconds Manager data data sheet
testing to Shift 100% back check
submission
18 confirm confirmation and containment
functional Inspection with known Inform customer
Calibrated leak
Equipment integrity tester First & Last off part
A (0.01mm) 29.5 Check Sheet
calibration #320 and every shift
seconds max
stopwatch

Production test
Important OBD
7 rig 100% inprocess
part & OBD 5 Gauss
and Quality all 100% test
confirmation maximum 100% back check
Residual Manager data data she
testing 19 and containment
magnetic flux submission
Inform customer
Inspection
Equipment OBD First & Last off
4.8 ~ 4.9 Gauss tester Check Sheet
calibration every shift
#321

Add Confirmation A 100% inprocess 100% back check


Presence of
confirmation 20 marks for 18 all 100% part and containment.
correct marks
marks & 19 above OBD identification Inform customer

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Example of Nissan Important Part

ANPQP - CONTROL PLAN

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: 123456 / Ver.2
521 Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/5/6
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2011/1/6
Supplier Plant: Top Parts Supplier Code: A468 Tel: fmer@topp.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Tokyo, Japan Author: F. Mercury Tel: +81-49-456-7890
Part Name: Tank Supplier Approval: S O Else R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 54010 BU00 Date: 2011/5/6 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/5/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: HEB - 66X Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.

Process Characteristics Spec.Char. Methods


Machine, Device,
/ Key Specification / Evaluation / Sample
Jig, Tools for Maintenance Poka Yoke Reaction Plan
No. Description No. Product Process Feature Tolerance Measurement Control Method
Mfg. Size Freq'cy
Ident'n Technique
Production
Thread Rework to
Final M10 x 20 x 1.25 standard thread Per
8 8 condition 5 Check Sheet procedure
Inspection NES D1012 Gauge Hour
(post paint) REW547 or scrap
M10 x 20 x 1.25

Production Black ED
Confirmation Salt spray test
coating of Adjust process
Testing to Per Lab report
9 13 mild Test cabinet 1 and inform
(excluding NES SPM007 Month and review
Important /
steel customer
400 Hours
OBD tests). reinforcer

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Process Flow Chart (PFC)

Key Point(s):

 The Process Flow Chart is the document that describes the manufacturing steps to produce, assemble, check, rework, repair, store and to
send the parts to Renault and/or Nissan.
 The Process Flow Chart is used to analyze the total process rather than the individual steps. It allows the user to see the impacts of variations
(machines, material, manpower, etc.) on the process.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

The following items are expected as a minimum content of this document:


 A schematic layout of the complete process from goods inwards to dispatch including all inspection points (and associated documentation)
and all sub-processes (on separate flow charts if necessary).
 This shall include:
 All raw material and components inputs for each Process operation,
 All Key processes from both the customer and the supplier point of view,
 All processes involved in the manufacture of Special Characteristics must be identified,
 All logistic routes within the supplier controlled process,
 All on line and off line storage points,
 The exit points for Service parts,
 All routine off-standard operations processes (e.g. rework, component reclaim),
 All points where product is labelled / identified,
 Identification of process constraints (bottlenecks).
 For those products having a common process flow a generic chart can be used showing the common process stages and a reference sheet
to identify the affected part numbers.
 The supplier must ensure consistency throughout all documentation (e.g.: Control plan, Process Flow Chart , Special Characteristic and Key
Features Diagram, Inspection Report, FMEA) for;
 operation step numbering
 product characteristics identification
 During Ramp-up, all the ramp-up activities shall be clearly indicated in the Process Flow Chart.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Output Document Description:

 The Supplier shall use flowchart symbols specified by an appropriate standard to complete the layout.
 For Modular Assemblies (Cock-Pit Module (CPM), Front-End Module (FEM) etc.), the “Component Supply Chain Chart (CSCC)” should be
appended to the flowchart.

Note(s):

For Renault:
 The following symbols should be used for the Process Flow Chart.
 If the supplier wants to use another standard, they shall :
 first ask for Renault agreement,
 give to Renault the symbols description

Production operation Manual production Decision Storage Document


operation

For Nissan:
 The supplier shall use flowchart symbols specified by an appropriate standard to complete the layout.
 The supplier shall clarify the meaning of the symbols used in a legend.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Floor Plan Layout (FPL)

Key Point(s):

 The Floor Plan Layout is the document that shows the facilities installation and product flow inside the plant.
 The layout should also describe complete process from incoming material to final shipping
 The supplier shall confirm the flow line of parts, products and operator by using floor layout plan.
 No possibility of cross-contamination and wrong parts mix
 No possibility of non-conformity mix and non-conforming out flow
 No possibility of physical damage for parts and components
 It should be updated during the life of product.

Minimum Completion Requirement(s):

 The following items are expected as a minimum content of this document:


 Show clearly identified areas as following:
[In Plant]
 Incoming and Dispatch Area
 Parts Storage Area
 Materials Storage Area
 Work in Progress Storage Area
 Finished Product Storage Area
 Tools
 Equipment
 Work Station
 Rework Station
[In Work place]
 Lighting
 Documents (e.g. Visual Aids, Working Instruction, Control Plan)
 Tools
 Equipment
 Red Box (for non-conforming products and parts storage)

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
 The supplier must ensure consistency throughout all documentation for:
 Operation step numbering
 Product characteristics identification

Output Document Description:

 Supplier own document

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Work Instructions (WI)

Key Point(s):

 The Work Instructions specify the actions required to carry out an operation. These documents shall be created for all employees having
responsibilities for the operation of processes that impact conformity to product requirements e.g. manufacturing operations including rework
and repair, inspection, calibration, maintenance, logistics etc.
 These instructions shall be accessible for use at the work station and shall be in a format and language that is easily understandable by the
operators.
 These instructions shall be derived from sources such as the quality plan, the control plan and the product realization process, and shall be
continuously improved through feedback from the operators.
 Suppliers shall describe the best operation method with which they can keep the quality, delivery, cost, and also safety.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 Each work instruction shall include:


 Operation number
 Operation description
 Main steps required to complete the operation
 Key points / Care points and reasons for them
 Inspection requirements, inspection criteria and reaction instructions
 Identification of Special Characteristics and Key Features.
 Reference number, authorization signature & date
 The use of “Photographs / Sketches” to support explanations and “Cycle Time (Take Time)” to validate operator skill are recommended.
 The supplier must ensure consistency throughout all documentation for:
 Operation step numbering
 Product characteristic identification

Output Document Description:

 Supplier own document

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Control No:XXXXXXX 1/1

Process No. Revise (Create) day Jul-14


No.xx Revised points
Operation
Name Mouse Assembly
Protective
safety Glass Review
equipment
Tools N/A Manager NISSAN
TARO

Parts etc. Mouse, Battery Create Line leader NISSAN


JIRO

No. Main Step Main steps


1 Time 2 Key Point (Reason) 3 Operation step, Instructions etc
4
(sec)
1 Obtain mouse with right hand and orient as in figure The Plus (+) side of a battery should be to the
Obtain the mouse as
1 1 left-hand side. 1 shown
2 NG for "(-) " to the
(Battery need to assemble from left side)
left side.
2 Insert battery to the battery slot of the mouse body to make sure the plus side of a battery is on
4
left-hand side of the mouse body. Battery Slot
(Mouse will not operate if battery is inserted
incorrectly . )
3 Cover tab is inserted into the hole of the mouse Insert into the hole of main mouse body on the
(-)
body right and left. (+)
4 (If the tab is not secured in the mouse body
hole, the cover will not be secured)
4 Cover attaches to the left-side face of the mouse After cover is assembled to the mouse main
body, which shall be assembled to the mouse body part, it attaches and cover slides to right-hand
by sliding the cover left to right 2 side. (Unless it slides, the cover rear does
not seat correctly. )
3-1 Cover tab is inserted 3-2 Insert tab in to the hole
5 Gently push down on the middle of the mouse body Push until click sound is heard. into the hole of a of O mark of the mouse
cover until click sound is heard . mouse body.
2 body.

6 Gently push down on the rear of the mouse body Push until click sound is heard.
cover until click sound is heard .
If there is no sound, put the assembly into the
red box.
2
Mouse cover tab could be broken.

Cover nail may broken.

4 5 Gently push down on the


middle part of the mouse
body until click sound
Cover attached to the left
side face of the mouse body,
ahich shall be assembled to
the mouse body by sliding
the cover left to right
Cilck
Push down until it makes
sound "Click" the backside
6 into once.
NG
Gap between
cover

Click!
Total 15
Special note 5 ※Power of pushing a cover: The grade which can carry bread through with a finger.
*When it does not sound click at the time of attachment , fall and abnormalities occur on parts, stop work
immediately, report to the assistant manager or a leader, and wait for directions. Stop work immediately, report to
the assistant manager or a leader, and wait for directions.
Control No: XXXXXXX 1/1
Process No. Revise (Create) day Jul-14
Operation No.xx Revised points
Name Final inspection for Mouse Assembly
Protective
Safety Glass Review
equipment
Tools Torque driver Manager NISSAN
TARO

Parts etc. Mouse Create Line leader NISSAN


JIRO

No. Main Step Main steps 1 Time


(sec)
2 Key Point (Reason) 3 Operation step, Instructions etc. 4
1 Conduct apperance check visually. Along with an arrow, a wheel and a right-and-left
(Upper side) switch should appear from the upper surface. Inspect along the dotted
2
1 lines in the direction of 2 Inspect aling the dotted
the arrows lines
(Easy to find burr and Foreign substance)

2 Conduct apperance check visually. Remove the burr and assure no foreign
(Tail side) 2 substance along dotted line.

(It is easy to find burr and Foreign substance on


switch and wheel.)
3-1 Conduct appearance check visually. Remove the burr and assure no foreign
(Left side-side) substance along dotted line. Shake the main
2 (It is easy to find burr and Foreign substance on Inspect along the assembly in the direction
Dimple) 3-1 dotted lines. 3-2 of the arrow .
Check for unusual sound
and inspect along dotted
3-2 Conduct appearance check visually for A main part is shaken in the direction of an line
contamination. arrow.
(Right side-side) Checks that there is not unusual sound.

1.5 Remove the burr and assure no foreign


substance along dotted line.

(Easy to find burr on this side.)


4 Push and check the operation button Click
on both sides.
When there is not sound, put it into a red box.
2 Contamination
Swich may broken.

5 Rotate and check the operation wheel. Wheel shall Rotate smoothly. 4-1 4-2
Check that it clicks twice and Check that it clicks twice and
When rotate is not smooth, put mouse into the operates smoothly. operates smoothly.
2
red box.
Assure no presence of contamination in the
wheel.

Click
Click
5 Confirm wheel rotation smoothly 2

【Sampling】
Sampling for first part of 1 Carton(12 Parts)
The rotation torque of a wheel is recorded as
measurement with an exclusive torque meter.
Parts Wheel
Total 11.5 Click Torque 0.01~0.02 Nm

Special note 5 1/ Torque meter


Method 1Carton
*When it does not sound click at the time of attachment , fall and abnormalities occur on parts, stop work Control Charts
(12parts)
immediately, report to the assistant manager or a leader, and wait for directions. Stop work immediately, report to the
assistant manager or a leader, and wait for directions.
Instructions for key points
No Items Potential risk (if not specified)
Main steps Even if a worker changes, the turn and the When work varies by workers, cycle time, product characteristics, a
methods of work, such as how to move hand quality characteristic, etc. are influenced.

1 and foot so that the same work result may be
brought, are described.
Time (Sec) Work and inspection time required in order to <Omission of standard work operation Time>
secure the production capacity and quality ・If the planned cycle time is insufficient, then it is impossible to attain
which were set up. plan production volumes
2 ・ Insufficient inspection time leads to poor product quality .

<Even if time is indicated, sometimes there is a big deviation between
the planned and actual operation inspection times>.
・When operation time is insufficient, incorrect parts flow happens by
omitting a part of inspection and work.
Key Point (Reason) Explains the point (main point) for working ・If Key point is not followed then the product quality and safety is
correctly, and it must always be protected . compromised.

3 Explained why Key point must be observed. Cannot understand Key point as an important point.

Operation step, Instructions etc To make the contents of work easier to If only explanation by text only,
understand by figure, photo and etc. ・When educating new worker, it is harder for a new worker to
understand operation correctly.
4
④ ・Judgment is mistaken when a worker is unclear about the judgement.
・ When a superintendent does work observation, it is hard to judge
whether work is done correctly and easily.
Special note Describes for being specially careful for a
operator. There are many written examples of

5 -
correspondence of trouble shooting.
Matrix Quality Assurance (MQA) - Renault

Key Point(s):

 The MQA (Quality Assurance Matrix) is the document which demonstrates that no process failure will reach the customer/client (the final
customer, an intermediate client, the following department, the following operation....).
 The MQA tool aims at protecting the customer and checking the quality of this protection.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The Renault MQA shall be in accordance with the specific Renault MQA requirements (see Renault guide on the Supplier's Portal).

Output Document Description:

Item Completion guides


Supplier/ Product Details
Renault Project Renault Vehicle / Power train project for which the product has been developed /
manufactured.
Renault - CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Reference No. The Renault reference no. for the request.
Supplier Name Supplier Company name.
Supplier Plant Current location at which the product is produced.
Supplier Code Unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault / Nissan Purchasing Dept.
Author The name of the person who completed the document
Tel The telephone number of the person who completed the document

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing
Part No. & Issue Level: As issued by Renault / Nissan design department.
Design Note No. / DEVO The design note number relating to the product currently being manufactured
Drawing No. As issued by Renault / Nissan design department
Affected Vehicle(s) References of the Renault / Nissan vehicles affected by the proposed change.
Control Plan Reference / Version Supplier Control plan reference or version impacted by this MQA study.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
RENAULT S.A.

ANPQP - MQA Supplier

S 1 Document Reference No / Version :

Renault Project : X29 Renault - CSR R 2 ver--1

Document version date : 12/10/2010

Supplier Name: FF Supplier Supplier Code: 000XXXXAA Document origin date : 01/10/2010

Supplier Plant : FF Supplier plant 1 Author: Tel N°:

Part Name : DER Part Affected Vehile(s) : X29 , all version

Part No & Issue level : 82000AAAAAAAA Control Plan Reference / Version : CPDER--D

Design Note N°/ DEVO : B00XX00

SUPPLIER COMMENTS :
only one workstation still not fully impoved.

SUPPLIER SIGN OFF


Name Date Signature
Mr Quality Man 14/10/2010 Quality Man

RENAULT COMMENTS :
As the MQA Study has been almost finished:
An audit on MQA implementation will be performed in January 2011

MQA Supplier attached YES NO

Copyright © Renault / NissanV 1/2


RENAULT S.A.

ANPQP - MQA Supplier

S 1 Document Reference No / Version :

Renault Project : X29 Renault - CSR R 2 ver--1

Document version date : 12/10/2010

Supplier Name: FF Supplier Supplier Code: 000XXXXAA Document origin date : 01/10/2010

Supplier Plant : FF Supplier plant 1 Author: Tel N°:

Part Name : DER Part Affected Vehile(s) : X29 , all version

Part No & Issue level : 82000AAAAAAAA Control Plan Reference / Version : CPDER--D

Design Note N°/ DEVO : B00XX00

Copyright © Renault / NissanV 2/2


5.3 Tooling, Gauges and Facility Management

Activity Purpose:

 The supplier shall manage all necessary equipment to ensure that Renault-Nissan requirements are achieved and maintained.
As part of this management, the supplier shall ensure that all equipment is capable, reliable and in a stable condition during
use.

Note(s):

 Equipment to be managed includes, but is not limited to, machinery, moulds, jigs and fixtures, tools, gauges, inspection and
test equipment.
 Planned changes to equipment conditions (e.g. changes required as a result of a modification to the product or process) shall
be managed through the change management activity.
 Unplanned changes to equipment conditions (e.g. damage, wear etc.) shall be managed through the suppliers' maintenance
processes.
 Unless otherwise completed following steps, the supplier shall not start regular production.
 Check the equipment condition/function (including poka-yoke (error-proofing)) along with the check sheet.
 Inspect first article after set-up sample size along the check sheet. (e.g. Three pieces before regular production)
 Assign an appropriate person (e.g. supervisor) and review the result of inspection.
 Submission of Gauge Specification and Approval Sheet
Upon agreement with Renault-Nissan, the supplier's own document may be used.
Submission will be required in two stages:
 Gauge specification confirmation prior to gauge manufacture.
 Gauge approval after gauge manufacture, prior to the supplier's initial "off-tool" trial build.
 Ownership
Part specific gauges shall be specified and procured by the supplier. Ownership of gauges will be agreed with the relevant
Renault-Nissan Purchasing Dept.
 Material
All materials employed in the manufacture of the base or surface of the gauge shall be sufficiently robust and hard wearing to

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Withstand normal usage and handling, whilst retaining dimensional stability throughout model life. Material selection should
reflect the ability to allow minor modifications and / or repairs to be carried out easily, quickly, efficiently and at relatively low
cost.
 Calibration
Calibration of gauges shall be monitored and maintained by the supplier. The supplier shall provide and maintain a gauge
Calibration report to confirm the gauge has been introduced into the supplier’s calibration system. Initial gauge buy off data
shall be recorded and retained for all Special Characteristics and Key Features.

Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity Specify equipment (including Implement the Ensure all necessary Maintain the condition
Content test equipment), tools, dies installation plan equipment is installed of all necessary
and gauges. and monitor as per the installation equipment, including
Create an installation plan progress. plan. the correct function of
related to the equipment, Conduct trials of the all error proofing
tools, dies and gauges. mass production devices.
condition to prepare If a change is required,
the system for mass follow the change
production management activity
Validate the equipment (including test
equipment), tools, dies and gauges using the
results of production at the off-tool and
off-process trials.
Output  Gauge Specification and Approval Sheet
Document

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number:

 7.3 Design and development


 7.5 Production and service provision
 7.6 Control of monitoring and measuring devices

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
ANPQP - GAUGE SPECIFICATION AND APPROVAL SHEET

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: 12345
Q78 V Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/5/3
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2011/3/29
Supplier Name: Automotive Air Systems Supplier Code: B701 E-mail: fschultz@aas.co.jp
Supplier Plant: International Falls, Minnesota, USA Author: Fred Schultz Tel: 419-465-2045
Part Name: External air scoop Drawing No: NBX-200 [1]
Part No. & Issue Level: 27658 AB00 Gauge Reference: EAS 123
Design Note No. / DEVO: NBX-200
Gauge Specification Sheet
Interface Targets / Proximity Parts & Customer Agreed Check Points: Specification Details and Appended Support Document References:

See attached documents for details:


1. CAD Drawing 26010
2. Drawing Reference G-22010-10
3. CAD Drawing 26010 1D231-C1

Measuring / Check Points for Part Gauge (Visual and Coordinate Detail):
X Y Z I J K
1 ### 132 860 -1 0 -1
2 ### 99 880 0.6 -1 0.4
3 ### 120 830 -0 0 -1
4 ### 99 844 -0 0 -1
5 ### 0 845 -0 0 -1
6 ### -0 882 0.9 0 0.3
7 ### -99 844 -0 0 -1
8 ### ## 830 -0 0 -1
9 ### 99 880 0.5 0.7 0.4
10 ### ## 860 -0 0 -1
11 ### 10 860 -0 0 -1

Calibration Frequency:
Every 6 Months

Supplier Gauge Specification Approval:

Name: Betty J. Smith Date: 2011/3/29

Signature: Betty Smith

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


ANPQP - GAUGE SPECIFICATION AND APPROVAL SHEET

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: 12345
Q78 V Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/5/3
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2011/3/29
Supplier Name: Automotive Air Systems Supplier Code: B701 E-mail: fschultz@aas.co.jp
Supplier Plant: International Falls, Minnesota, USA Author: Fred Schultz Tel: 419-465-2045
Part Name: External air scoop Drawing No: NBX-200 [1]
Part No. & Issue Level: 27658 AB00 Gauge Reference: EAS 123
Design Note No. / DEVO: NBX-200
Gauge Approval Sheet
Specification Required Inspection / Buy off Approval
Items Comments
Pedigree / Reference (Yes / No) Report No./ Ref. (Yes / No)

Body / Mating Part Fix Area Identification (Body / Mating Part Recreation in X.Y.Z axis) CAD Drawing 26010 Yes ISR 50019 Yes

Drawing Reference
Key Gauge Tolerances Identification (Mating Part Surfaces, Location Surfaces) Yes ISR 50020 Yes
G-22010-10

CAD Drawing 26010


Details of Mating Part "Gap and Flush" Yes N/A Yes
1D231-C1

Gauge Materials Report G-26010-10 Yes ISR-M 50021 Yes

Gauge Inspection / Dimensional Report INT-S 3214 Yes R-R 50016 Yes
Gauge
Approval
Activity Bias & Linearity Report INT-S 3421 Yes R-R 50017 Yes
and
Reports
Fit & Function Report INT- S 3065 Yes R-R50017 Yes

Repeatability & Reproducibility Report INT-S 2187 Yes R-R 50019 Yes

Setting Masters Details and References 26010-333 Yes ISR 50016 Yes

Gauge Work Instructions Reference Details Wi-26010 Yes N/A Yes


Comments: Gauge R&R data attached.

Supplier Gauge Approval: Renault / Nissan Acknowledgement:

Name: Fred Schultz Date: 2011/5/3 Name: Date:

Signature: Fred Schultz Signature:


Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


5.4 Process Capability Study and Improvement

Purpose:

 Evaluate, monitor and manage process capability in order to maintain a capable and stable process condition that continuously achieves the
Renault-Nissan targets.

Note(s):

 If process capability requirements are not achieved, all products shall be subjected to additional confirmation activities to prevent delivery of
non-conforming product until effective countermeasure(s) are implemented and verified.
 In order to maintain a capable and stable process condition, the supplier shall identify an "unusual" or "abnormal" process conditions.
(Examples of an "unusual" or "abnormal" process conditions include (but are not limited to) difficulties experienced during set-up and start-up or
excessive noise or vibration from equipment during operation.)
 In the event of an "unusual" or "abnormal" process condition being identified, the supplier shall implement a reaction plan, including escalation
where appropriate.
 If the process capability does not achieve the Renault-Nissan requirements, the supplier shall establish root cause(s) and implement effective
countermeasure(s) to meet the requirements by the time to submit Part Submission Warrant (PSW).
 The supplier shall continuously monitor and reduce variation in both product and manufacturing process characteristics.

Index Nissan Renault


Quality Target All products / parts to be free from defects The requirement is different if the bought-out is a
Process Capability Studies & Minimum Cpk Renault Vehicle Engineering part or a Renault
Target  Normal Characteristics >1.0 Powertrain Engineering part.
 Special Characteristics >1.33 see
(Important A, B, C, OBD and other notified https://suppliers.renault.com, then click Quality >
specific cases) Chapter "Get a Standard" > Chapter "Download
Tools"> HCPP and Capability for Vehicle Engineering
or
HCPP and Capability for Powertrain Engineering
Other conditions

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity  Make a Process  Carry out the process  Carry out the process Update the Process
Content Capability Study Plan capability evaluation of capability of off process Capability Study Plan if
after define characteristics off tool parts along with and its parts and update any change and submit
in the component the Process Capability the Process Capability the Process Capability
drawings and Study Plan and make Study Result. Study Results if the
specification. the Process Capability Renault-Nissan requests.
Study Result.
 Update the final Process
Capability Study Plan
based on the evaluation
results.

Output  Process Capability Study Plan


Document  Process Capability Study Results

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number:

 7.3 Design and development


 8.2 Monitoring and measurement
 8.4 Analysis of data
 8.5 Improvement

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Process Capability Study Plan (PCSP)

Key Point(s):

 The process capability study plan is the document that describes how the supplier will implement the process capability study during;
 Phase 3 for off-tool parts if applicable
 Phase 4 for off-process parts

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

The process capability study plan shall include:


 Identification of all characteristics to be studied
(These shall include items from the Special Characteristics and Key Features diagram as a minimum)
 Measurement data analysis method to be used (e.g. Cpk, TAG etc.)
 Target value of process capability for each identified characteristic
 Specification (nominal and tolerance) of each identified characteristic
 Sample size for each identified characteristic
 Schedule for collection and analysis of measurement data
 Device/Tool for measuring/inspect characteristics of a product (e.g. Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM))

Output Document Description:

 Supplier own document

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Process Capability Study Results (PCSR)

Key Point(s):

 The Process Capability Study Results is a document that records the result of the detailed capability study for each feature identified on the
Process Capability Study Plan.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

The Process Capability Study Results shall include the followings (as a minimum):
 Identification of all characteristics to be studied
(These shall include items from the Special Characteristics and Key Features diagram as a minimum.)
 Measurement data analysis method to be used (e.g. Cpk, TAG etc.)
 Target value of process capability for each identified characteristics
 Specification (nominal and tolerance) of each identified characteristics
 Sample size for each identified characteristics
 Device/Tool for measuring/inspect characteristics of a product (e.g. Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM))
 Measured raw data and result of analysis (i.e. Raw data and Cp, Cpk calculation)
 Recovery plan including containment actions and permanent countermeasures for those features that do not meet the targets.

Output Document Description:

 Supplier own document

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
5.5 Confirmation of Full Volume Conditions

Purpose:

 Confirm that the supplier's processes are capable of producing parts at full volume condition that meet all Renault-Nissan targets by conducting
a manufacturing trial. (e.g. Supplier-Full Volume Confirmations (FVC), significant production trial, line speed demonstration etc.)

Note(s):

 Confirmation of manufacturing trial as full volume condition shall be conducted and report the result to Renault-Nissan.
 If any concerns arise during this manufacturing trial, an additional full volume condition confirmation manufacturing trial shall be conducted to
confirm countermeasures prior to the supplier's start of production.
 Renault-Nissan will select certain suppliers and carry out an additional audit activity on their process to confirm their ability to support
Renault-Nissan requirements before, during and after ramp-up.
 The date, duration, product quantity and mix for this activity shall be agreed with Renault-Nissan.
 This activity will be carried out at the same time as the final manufacturing trial by supplier.

Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity  Review / audit the process prior to the start of volume production.  Continue to monitor
Content  Conduct a manufacturing trial that fully represents final production conditions for man, process/product
material, machine and method. performance.
 The trial shall demonstrate set-up, changes and parts identification through to labelling for
dispatch etc. and cover all shifts.
 All production jigs, fixtures, tooling, gauges and facilities shall be used.
Output  Full Volume Confirmation Audit Results
Document

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number:

 7.3 Design and development


 7.4 Purchasing (for example; 7.4.3 Verification of purchased product)
 7.5 Production and service provision
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
 8.2 Monitoring and measurement
 8.5 Improvement (for example; 8.5.1.2 Manufacturing process improvement)

Return to the ANPQP Matrix

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Full Volume Confirmation Audit Results - Self Audit (FVCAR)
Key Point(s):

 The Full Volume Confirmation Audit Results document shows the results of a full volume confirmation audit carried out by the supplier prior to
the start of production.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The document content shall provide evidence that:


 All required ANPQP documents are submitted and match as requirements by Renault/ Nissan
 All personnel associated with the manufacture of the product (production staff, material handling & warehouse staff, inspection staff etc.)
are fully trained to the required skill level.
 All raw materials, components and sub component assemblies are controlled.
 All production and inspection facilities and equipment are maintained and calibrated.
 All process documentation is in place and reflects the correct product design level.
 All necessary packaging materials are available.
 The manufacturing location and its surroundings have no negative impact on the product.
 The actual cycle times for all processes match the predicted cycle times quoted in the Production Capacity Plan.
 The manufacturing output (straight through ratio, OK ratio etc.) matches the required manufacturing output detailed in the Supplier
Production Preparation Monitoring Plan.
 The actual tool change and set-up times match the predicted times quoted in the Production Capacity Plan.
 The actual cycle times, straight through ratio, OK ratio, Capacity Utilization Rate is match as production supply requirements during and
after SOP.
 If any concerns are identified during the Full Volume Confirmation trial, they should be documented in the Full Volume Confirmation Audit
Results document. Countermeasure actions including implementation timing, responsibilities and confirmation activities must be documented
for all concerns.

Output Document Description:

 Process Audit Format -Alliance Supplier Process Qualification Review-


Regarding the Process confirmation items, the Supplier shall use the Standard, provided by Renault-Nissan at each company’s portal web site.
 Capacity Audit Format
Regarding the Capacity confirmation items, the Supplier shall use the Standard, provided by Renault-Nissan at each company’s portal web site.
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
5.6 Activities during Ramp-up

Activity Purpose:

 Plan and implement additional activities to ensure quality and delivery requirements are maintained during the launch period.

Notes:

 The activities during ramp-up have two distinct objectives:


 achievement and maintenance of the quality requirements
 achievement and maintenance of the delivery requirements
 For quality, the Ramp-up Activity is a planned management confirmation activity covering the period from the end of process development through
to the achievement of a stable full volume condition.
 The content of the activity shall be planned prior to Start of Production (SOP).
 The plan should have duration of approx. 3 months after SOP.
 This activity shall continue until Renault-Nissan agrees to its removal.
 The supplier shall ensure that any quality issues that may arise are quickly identified, contained and corrected at the supplier's location and not at
the Renault-Nissan plants.
 For delivery, the Ramp-up Activity is an activity to manage the effects of the increase in production volume on the supplier's ability to meet delivery
requirements.
 These activities will be used to verify the supplier's Production Capacity Plan.
 The supplier shall ensure that any delivery issues that may arise are quickly identified and corrected.

Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity  Create and implement a Ramp-up Activity Plan that shall  Monitor progress of the Ramp-up Activity Plan and implement
Content achieve the two objectives of the ramp-up period. countermeasures.
Output  Ramp-Up Activity Plan
Document
 Ramp-Up Activity Concern and Countermeasure Report

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number:

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
 7.5 Production and service provision
 8.2 Monitoring and measurement
 8.3 Control of nonconforming product
 8.4 Analysis of data
 8.5 Improvement

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Ramp-up Activity Plan (RUAP)

Key Point(s):

 The Ramp-up Activity Plan is a document that describes the additional activities that the supplier has to implement in order to ensure that quality and delivery
requirements are maintained during the launch period.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 A documented Ramp-up Activity Plan is required. This Plan may exist independently but shall be consistent with the pre-production control plan and the production
capacity plan
 Examples of additional activities which may be included in the Ramp-up Activity Plan are:
 Off-line, separate and independent check from the normal production process whenever possible
 100% inspection
 Increased frequency/sample size of receiving, process and or shipping inspections.
 Sub-supplier containment and or sub-supplier support/audits
 Addition of inspection/control items
 Increased verification of label accuracy
 The Ramp-up Activity Plan shall also specify clear exit criteria for the ramp-up period. These criteria shall cover:
 Internal & external defect ratios
 Capability
 Capacity
 Duration of activity
 If the supplier is unable to meet the exit criteria, or the supplier's ramp-up activity continues to identify non-conformances, the supplier shall continue the necessary
additional activities until the quality or delivery concerns have been resolved to the satisfaction of Renault-Nissan.
 The organization for the management of the ramp-up activity shall be identified on the Ramp-up Activity plan.

Output Document Description:

 Supplier own document

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Ramp-up Activity Concern and Countermeasure Report

Key Point(s):

 The Ramp-up Activity Concern and Countermeasure Report is a document that lists the concerns found during the ramp-up period, the root cause
of the concerns and the final countermeasures. It is linked to the Ramp-up Activity Plan.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 This report shall list the following information:


 Concerns found during launch
 Root cause for the concerns
 Immediate (interim) countermeasure
 Planned implementation of permanent irreversible countermeasure
 Responsible person

Output Document Description:

 Supplier own document

Return to the ANPQP Matrix

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Ramp-up Activity Plan Date 2008/2/21

R / N Project Supplier code Supplier name Approve Check Author

562 Y000 ABC Electronics B.Fore Z.Plant N.Done

No Item Contents
1 Parts name & number SEN ASSY 00000 AA001,
2 Manufacture Plant Tokyo Plant,JPN
3 Target Category Item Target number Responsibility (Dep.Name)
Quality
Qty. or PPM of rejected products
0 ppm B.Fore(QA)
at Nissan Plant

Tokyo Plant in-process failure rate 500 PPM B.Fore(QA)


Cost, Delivery Scrapping ratio/cost 0.30%
Activity period From 2008/2/21 to 2008/5/21
4 Organization for Ramp-up activity

1, Top Manager - Name, Position F.Mercury Plant Director


2, Person in charge of Quality Production shop Inspection shop Special Inspection shop
and Production info control
Principal M.Aybee A. Martini B.Fore
Vice N.Body S.Else Z.Plant

3, Feedback Meeting - Meeting time From 8am to 10am , everyday


- Chairman B.Fore

5 Control items in Ramp up activity Control item Frequency : Normal -> Ramp-up period Note
Electrical components
Components damaged
100% Visual inspection >>> Add 100%
Teared components
visual inspection in Ramp up period
Lack of components
Soldering
Insufficiencies 100% visual inspection >>> Add 100%
Soldering Excess soldering quality visual inspection in Ramp
Cuts up period
Crimping
Insufficiencies
100% crimping operator visual inspection ,
Lack of crimps
>>> Add 100% soldering quality visual
crimps damaged inspection in Ramp up period
crimping centering
Cable
Cable connector damaged
100% operator visual inspection >>> Add
Cable damaged
100% visual inspection in Ramp up period
Lack of clips
Cable length Operation is made in
100% operator visual inspection the same process
Lack of pillars
Sensor Mat
Lack of adhesive tape 100% Crimping operator visual inspection
Sensor Mat contaminated >>> Add 100% visual inspection in Ramp
Sensor Mat bent up period
Overmolding
Bubbles
Crimping area bubbles 100% Overmolding operator visual
contamination inside overmolding inspection >>> Add 100% visual inspection
Excess of overmolding material in Ramp up period
Cable out side overmolding
Labeling
Label with incorrect position
Operation is
Label printing with bad quality
100% operator visual inspection made in the
Plastic cap damaged same process
Plastic cap with bad position
6 Exit criteria for ramp-up activity Achieve all targets established in No.3, and get permission of exit ramp-up activity from Top management of
ramp-up activity.

Copyright (C) Renault-NISSAN All Rights Reserved


5.7 Identification and Traceability

Purpose:

 To ensure that all products are adequately identified and controlled, Renault-Nissan requires its suppliers to operate an effective identification and
traceability system.
 To ensure that all products/parts are adequately identified and controlled, Renault-Nissan requires its suppliers to operate an effective lot control
system. The suppliers are requested to maintain a register that can cross reference lot numbers and manufacturing characteristics to facilitate
traceability on request.

Note(s):

 Traceability control method to be applied will be ordered in the document (including drawing) by Renault-Nissan design engineer.
 If there is no order of control method from Renault-Nissan, the supplier shall determine the control method based on the experience or standard in
the supplier or agreement with Renault-Nissan relevant department.
 The tier 1 supplier shall manage traceability for all products and components delivered to Renault-Nissan facilities.
 In order to do this, the tier 1 supplier shall deploy the identification and traceability requirements to their sub-suppliers.
 For selected products, identification and traceability requirements may be specified on the Renault-Nissan approved drawings and/or data notes.
If this is the case, the supplier must comply with the requirements specified on the relevant drawing and/ or data note. (Refer to the “4.5 Special
Characteristics Management”)
 For products where no particular identification and traceability requirements are specified on the approved drawings and/or data notes, the supplier
must comply with the requirements contained in the ISO/TS 16949 and within the relevant requirements.
 To keep the part traceability the lot size is left to the supplier to decide, but should be small enough to ensure control and to provide for identification
and traceability within a few hours from a request by Renault-Nissan.
 Renault-Nissan reserves the right at any time to audit the supplier's compliance with these identification and traceability requirements.

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number:

 7.2 Customer related process


 7.3 Design and development
 7.4 Purchasing
 7.5 Production and service provision

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
6. PRODUCT CONFIRMATION

Category Purpose:

 Verify that the product design meets Renault-Nissan requirements.


 Validate that the products made from production tools and processes meet the Renault-Nissan requirements.

Element Activity:

 6.1 Design Verification and Product / Process Validation

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
6.1 Design Verification and Product/Process Validation

Activity Purpose:

 The supplier shall carry out:


Simulations or tests to ensure that the product design meets Renault-Nissan design requirements (Design Verification). These tests shall be carried
out using off-tool parts.
 Tests to confirm that the design verification results have not been compromised by the production process. These tests shall be carried out using
off-process parts. Product/ Process validation must demonstrate that production parts with production variation will meet all specified function and
performance requirements.
 A series of production trials in order to provide measured sample parts for use in Renault-Nissan assembly activities. These assembly activities
will provide confirmation that parts produced at each stage (prototype, off-tool, off-process etc.) meet the Renault-Nissan shape/ fit/ function/
assembly requirements when assembled with mating parts.

Note(s):

 When requested, the supplier shall attend the Renault-Nissan trial assembly activities to review the assembled part condition and confirm
Renault-Nissan assembly requirements.

Phase 1 2 3 4 5
 Create a design verification  Manufacture parts in the  Manufacture parts in the  Carry out Continuous
and product / process off-tool condition and perform off-process condition and conformance testing for
validation plan detailed measurement studies perform detailed measurement functional and performance
 When requested, manufacture to confirm that the parts meet studies to confirm that the parts requirements.
Activity prototype parts and perform design specification for meet design specification for  Carry out design verification
Content detailed measurement studies dimensions, material, dimensions, material, and product / process
to confirm that the parts meet appearance, etc. appearance, etc. validation activities for design
design specification for changes.
dimensions, material,
appearance, etc.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
 Implement the planned design verification activities. Confirmation  Implement the planned product
activities shall include: / process validation activities.
 Calculations. Confirmation activities shall
 Digital simulation / test. include:
 Confirmation of CAD data quality.  Test activities to validate
 Review of implementation of countermeasures from lessons that manufacturing
learned and recurrence prevention activities. process variation has not
affected the ability of the
parts to meet design
requirements for function
and performance.
 When requested, provide  Provide measured sample  Provide measured sample
measured sample parts in the parts in the off-tool condition for parts in the off-process
prototype condition for use in use in Renault-Nissan trial condition for use in
Renault-Nissan trial assembly assembly activities. Renault-Nissan trial assembly
activities. activities.
Output  Supplier Digital Test Report
Document  Supplier Test Plan and Report
 Inspection Report
 Appearance Approval Report (Nissan)

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number:

 7.3 Design and development

Return to the ANPQP Matrix

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Supplier Digital Test Report (SDTR)

Key Point(s):

 The Supplier Digital Test Report is a plan and summary of the testing carried out during the digital phase of development.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 Complete Supplier Digital Test Report to identify:


 The testing to be carried out (Test Plan),
 The test results.

Output Document Description:

For Renault:
 Supplier own document

For Nissan:

Item Completion Instructions


R / N Project Renault or Nissan Vehicle / Power train project for which the part is being developed /
manufactured.
Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed / manufactured.
Renault - CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Document Reference No./ Version The Suppliers reference no. and version no. for the document.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name Supplier Company name.
Supplier Plant Location at which the product will be produced.
Note:
If the site supplying off-tool parts for a trial build is different to those supplying off-process parts
for a later trial, this should be discussed with Renault / Nissan and should be reflected in all
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
project management documentation.
Supplier Code Unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault / Nissan Purchasing Dept.
Author The name of the person who created / revised the document.
E-mail The E-mail address of the person who created / revised the document.
Tel The telephone number of the person who created / revised the document.
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing.
Part No. & Issue Level: As issued by Renault / Nissan design department.
Design Note No. / DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed / manufactured.
SDTR No. The Nissan reference number for the Supplier Digital Test Report.
Report (Supplier): Fill in name who is the supplier representative with signature and date when report test result for
Name / Signature / Date each lot.
Approval (Nissan Design): Fill in name who is the Nissan representative with signature and date when report supplier test
Name / Signature / Date result for each lot.
Issue Level Indicate the issue level for the report.
Category Top level Regulatory / Security / Test Requirement.
Sub-categories Detail level Regulatory / Security / Test Requirement.
Sub-sub-categories Detail of reason for test that supports the test activity. (Effect on part / vehicle regulation /
security).
Testing Item Test type as specified in the Specification Tender, NDS and agreements between the Supplier
and Nissan Design Groups.
Assessment / Projection Method Method to be used to evaluate the requested performance item.
Assessment Result Actual or predicted judgments of evaluation result for specified test to be entered by supplier
responsible person. Options for result are restricted to:
OK - No concerns, test passed
NG - Test failed (action required)
CA - Caution - should meet the requirements but needs confirmation (testing shall be planned)
NA - Not applicable
Doc. No. Relevant report number for test result.
Note: if judgment is carried over from a previous trial lot, enter the lot reference.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
NISSAN

ANPQP - SUPPLIER DIGITAL TEST REPORT (SDTR)

R/N Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1


Doc Ref. No. / Ver.:
Project: X10A AA B OBD 2
SDTR X10A /□4
R Doc. Rev. Date: 2007/10/7
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: 2D78 Doc. Origin Date: 2007/3/3
Supplier Plant Name: Atsugi Author: Taro Tokyo Tel No.: +81 456 872 489
Part Name: Exterior Plastic Moulding SDTR Report No. KA1E-X10A-001
Part No. & Issue Level: 62123 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T0A458
Make plan Approve plan DS Lot report DS Lot approval DC Lot report Approve
(Supplier) (Nissan Design) (Supplier) (Nissan design) (Supplier) (Nissan design)
Name Taro Tokyo Ichiro Nissan Taro Tokyo Ichiro Nissan Taro Tokyo Ichiro Nissan
Signature T. Tokyo I. Nissan T. Taro I. Nissan T. Taro I. Nissan

Date 2007/3/3 2007/3/10 2007/7/3 2007/7/7 2007/10/3 2007/10/7


Issue level - - N 1 2 3
DS Lot DC Lot
Sub-sub- Assessment / Assessment /
Category Sub-category Testing Item Assessment Result Doc. No. Assessment Result Doc. No.
categories Projection Method Projection Method
European Damage by external
EEC79/488 impact (Corner radius)
- Simulation OK 1 Simulation OK 11
Regulations
Fit PQ Assessment DMDR OK 2, 3 DMDR OK DS
Maintaining good
Reliability appearance Vehicle Condition PQ Assessment Nissan(DMDR) OK - Nissan(DMDR) OK -
Assurance
Objectives No abnormal Fitting parts to prevent
noise or vibration
- Standard Structure OK 4 Standard Structure OK DS
noise or vibration

Deformation by touching - Simulation OK 5 Simulation OK 12


Rigidity
Retention of one-piece
moulded clip in detaching - Standard Structure OK NG[1] 6 Standard Structure OK 13
Deformation
Vibration amplitude Vibration Testing Simulation CA 7 Simulation OK 14
Performance caused by
Requirements Deformation Heat Aging
Surface luster Standard Structure OK 8 Standard Structure OK DS
caused by heat Testing
Deformation
External shape Simulation OK 9 Simulation OK DS
caused by Thermal cycle
repeated testing
Surface conditions Standard Structure OK 10 Standard Structure OK DS
exposure to heat

Copyright © 2013 Renault / Nissan


Supplier Test Plan and Report (STPR)

Key Point(s):

 The Supplier Test Plan and Report is the summary of the test results identified for each test period (prototype, off-tool, off process).
 The document begins as a test plan and is updated with results from the verification and validation tests as they are completed. The final version of the document
shall demonstrate the full conformity of the part to the functional and performance specifications.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The Supplier Test Plan and Report describes:


the tests to be done

the sample size to be used. This sample size must be statistically valid or otherwise agreed with Renault-Nissan

the acceptance criteria, including tolerance or maximum/ minimum

the result of the test

the test report references including issue level

the result status (and corrective actions plan if the test result is not OK).

 On submission, the Supplier Test Plan and Report must be accompanied by:
 a full dimensional report for the parts tested
 material analysis reports (if required)
 detailed test results, including all related data such as test method and setup, photographs, location of testing, test equipment etc.
 The Supplier Test Plan and Report must be accompanied by detailed test results with corresponding inspection reports, analysis and calculations.

Output Document Description:

Item Completion Instructions


Design Verification Tick the box to which the report applies:
Product Validation  Design Verification for reports on verification testing
 Product Validation for reports on validation testing
R / N Project Renault or Nissan Vehicle / Power train project for which the part is being developed /
manufactured.
Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed / manufactured.
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Renault - CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Document Reference No./ Version The Suppliers reference no. and version no. for the document.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name Supplier Company name.
Supplier Plant Location at which the product will be produced.
Note:
If the site supplying off-tool parts for a trial build is different to those supplying off-process parts
for a later trial, this should be discussed with Renault-Nissan and should be reflected in all
project management documentation.
Supplier Code Unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault-Nissan Purchasing Dept.
Author The name of the person who created / revised the document.
E-mail The E-mail address of the person who created / revised the document.
Tel The telephone number of the person who created / revised the document.
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing.
Part No. & Issue Level: As issued by Renault-Nissan design department.
Design Note No. / DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed / manufactured.
Related Parts Number / Reference and Name The part numbers / name of color, grade, model variants for which the same tests are valid
Plan Agreed Signature / Date Test plan approval signature and date of the senior representative of the supplier's relevant
department
Report Agreed Signature / Date Test report approval signature and date of the senior representative of the supplier's relevant
department
Formal Report Submission Date The date when the supplier shall submit the 'ANPQP - Supplier Test Plan and Report' and
supporting detail test reports (initial report or subsequent updates)
Test Period (Plan) (From / To) The planned commencement and completion dates for the test
Test Period (Actual) (From / To) The actual commencement and completion dates for the test
Spec tender / Design Date The latest design note number to which the test parts were manufactured
Manufacture Date The date the parts being tested were manufactured
Sample Tool Type The type and pedigree (prototype or production) of the tooling used to manufacture the test parts
The type and pedigree (prototype or production) of the mould used to manufacture the test parts,
Mould Type
if applicable
No. The sequential number for an individual test on the parts
Test Name and Requirements The name and requirement of the individual test.
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Test method Details of the method used to carry out the test or, if applicable, the details of the method used to
justify testing prediction
Acceptance criteria Details of the criteria required to achieve an acceptable test result.
Prediction, Justification & Report No. The supplier's prediction of the test result, the justification for the prediction and the report
number
OK / NG / CA / NA OK - No concerns, test passed
NG - Test failed (action required)
CA - Caution - should meet the requirements but needs confirmation (testing shall be planned)
NA - Not applicable
Sample Size The quantity of parts tested
Result Summary and Report No. The test result summary and the relevant report number
OK / NG / NA / NS / UT The test result
OK - No concerns, test passed
NG - Test failed (action required)
NA - Not applicable
NS - Testing not yet started
UT - Under Test (Testing not yet completed)

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
ANPQP - SUPPLIER TEST PLAN AND REPORT

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: A1245
D99K Doc. Rev. Date:
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2011/2/20
Supplier Name: BB Widgets MFG. LLC Supplier Code: X001 E-mail: chris-b@bbw.com
Supplier Plant: French Lick, Indiana, USA Author: Chris Bridgette Tel:
Part Name: Round Legged widget-Supreme Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 12345 ZK 09
Design Note No. / DEVO: NAM-X100

Related Parts Number/ Reference and Name: Plan Agreed Report Agreed Plan Agreed Report Agreed Plan Agreed Report Agreed Note
Signature C. Bridgette D.D. Clyde C. Bridgette D.D. Clyde
Date 28-Feb-11 17-Mar-11 5-Mar-11 9-Apr-11
Formal Report
15-Mar-11 30-Mar-11
Submission Date
Test Period (Plan) From: 2011/2/29 To: 10-Mar-11 From: 18-Mar-11 To: 30-Mar-11 From: To:
Test Period (Actual) From: 2-Mar-11 To: 11-Mar-11 From: 16-Mar-11 To: 30-Mar-11 From: To:
None Spec, Tender /
S NAM-X100 NAM-X100
Design Note No.
A Manufacture
M Jan-11 6-Mar-11
Date
P
Tool Type Prototype Production Tool at Tool supplier
L
E Mould Type

OK OK OK OK
Prediction NG NG NG On-going
NG Sample Result Summary & Sample Result Summary & Sample Result Summary &
No. Test Name & Requirements Test Method Acceptance Criteria Justification & CA
NA NA NA test
Size Report No. NS Size Report No. NS Size Report No. NS
Report No. NA UT UT UT
Frequency

Material Properties Supplier NES M 4468 11-123 OK 3 11-123A NG 3 11-123T OK 1/month


1
Set up
Dimensional Layout Supplier Drawing 11-234 OK 30 11-234A OK 30 11-234T OK
2 and
No Air Loss at
Air Leak 40300NDS09 11-679 CA 100% 11-679A NG 100% 11-679T OK 100%
3 289kPa
Static imbalance 43001NDS22 350 gram-cm 11-845 OK 100% 11-845A CA 100% 11-845T OK 100%
4
Run-out 44033NDS48 0.2 mm max 11-367 OK 100% 11-367A OK 100% 11-367T OK 100%
5
No discoloration,
Chemical Resistance 68003NDS70 11-209 CA 7 11-209A OK 7 11-209T OK 1/month
6 blistering or stains
Flatness 68003NDS56 0.05 mm NS 20 11-325 OK 20 11-325T OK 2/shift
7
Marking 43001NDS30 required Carry over OK 1 Carry over NA Carry over NA NA
8
Bending 440033NDS34 3.40 kN-m 11-713 Ok 7 11-713A NG 7 11-713T OK NA
9
Fatigue 73003NDS04 20.5 kN 11-714 CA 7 11-714A OK 7 11-714T OK 2/lot
10
Impact 47005NDS90 514 mm 11-856 OK 7 11-856A CA 7 11-856T OK 1/lot
11
OK: Test Satisfactory CA: Caution NG: No Good NA: Not Applicable NS: Not Started UT: Under Test

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


Inspection Report (IR)

Key Point(s):

The Inspection Report is a standard report form used to communicate product quality data. The characteristics to be inspected will be agreed with
Renault-Nissan prior to submission.

The Inspection Report must be submitted to Renault-Nissan with each trial parts submission. An Inspection Report shall be submitted to
Renault-Nissan following any changes to the product, material, process or tooling.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 Part Status:
 Process Instructions & Production Facilities
 Tier-N Components
 Control Gauges
 Packaging and Logistics
 Manufacturing process status
 Measurement data for all features identified on the drawing and in the Special Characteristics and Key Features Diagram. This shall include
measurement data from all suites / cavities of any multi-part tooling.
 The conformity status of each measurement (OK / Not OK)
 The unit for each measurement will be identified
 Supplier approval signature and date
 A unique report number
 IMDS (International Material Data System) ID number (data validated by R/N )should be inputted in inspection report.
 When there are plural parts for the inspection report, use “part number detail” and attached.

Note(s):

 Measured samples are required with each report submitted (minimum 5 samples)
 The measured samples shall be clearly numbered and referenced in the Inspection Report.
 The supplier must ensure consistency throughout all documentation for:
 operation step numbering
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
 product characteristics identification
(e.g.: Control plan, Process Flow Chart , Special Characteristic and Key Features Diagram, Inspection Report, FMEA)

Document Description:

Item Completion Instructions


Renault or Nissan Vehicle / Power train project for which the product is being developed /
R / N Project
manufactured.
Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed / manufactured.
Renault - CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.

Document Reference No./ Version The Suppliers reference no. and version no. for the document.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name Supplier Company name.
Supplier Plant Location at which the product will be produced.
Supplier Code Unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault-Nissan Purchasing Dept.
Author The name of the person who created / revised the document
E-mail The E-mail address of the person who created / revised the document.
Tel The telephone number of the person who created / revised the document
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing
Part No. & Issue Level As issued by Renault-Nissan design department
Design Note No. / DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed / manufactured.
Milestone The name of the Renault-Nissan milestone for which the inspected product is being delivered.
Control Plan Reference / Version The Control Plan reference number and the Issue Level that the parts have been manufactured

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
to.
Average Weight The average weight of 5 parts, in kilograms
Serial / Batch No. / RAN Batch reference as identified by the supplier
Part Production Date Date of production
Product Tick YES or NO. In case of "NO", explain in the "Comments" Column.
Manufacturing Status Indicate "Definitive" if the Item is fixed for mass production.
Process instructions & Production facilities Indicate "Definitive" if the Item is fixed for mass production.
List the critical components of the sub-suppliers, and their status according to the Document
TIER N Components
Legend
Logistics & Packaging Indicate "Definitive" if the Item is fixed for mass production.
Supplier Comments Any useful additional information to be added by the supplier
Dimensional Tick box if this page is covering Dimensional characteristics / results.
Material Tick box if this page is covering Material characteristics / results.
Appearance Tick box if this page is covering appearance characteristics / results.
Engineering Specification Testing Tick box if this page is covering engineering specification test characteristics / results.
Other Tick box if this page is covering any other characteristics / results and give a description
No. (match KFD) Product characteristic reference
The Special Characteristic or Key Feature reference / identification of the measured characteristic
Special Characteristic Symbol / feature (if applicable). This should be the same identification as used in the Special
Characteristics and Key Features diagram.
The specification and tolerance of the feature to be confirmed. This should be a description of the
Characteristic, Specification and Tolerance
feature or a reference to the relevant specification.
Nominal Dimension Nominal Dimension (numeric only)

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Upper Tolerance Upper Tolerance
Lower Tolerance Lower Tolerance (use minus sign)
Results 1-5 Show the results recorded from the measured samples.
Conformance OK / Not OK Check (tick) the box to show that result is OK or Not OK
Method of Measurement, Reports or Comments
Method of Measurement, Reports or Comments
Highlight and detail the reason for any not OK parts and / or reference any additional documents.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
ANPQP - INSPECTION REPORT

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc. Ref. No./Ver.:


Doc Rev. Date:
A B C OBD 2
R Doc. Origin Date:
Supplier Name: Supplier Code: E-mail:
Supplier Plant: Author: Tel:
Part Name: Control Plan Reference / Version:
Part No. & Issue Level: Average weight:
Design Note No. / DEVO: Serial / Batch No. / RAN:
Milestone: Part production date:

Product Yes No Comments (if "No" explain)


Part complies with the drawing issue level released in the system
Part is grained
Raw material is mass production
IMDS data validated by R/N IMDS#: 123456789 / 1
Part is OK (Inspection Report, Supplier Test Plan and Report) Welding checked OK, bold torque checked OK, Structural contents OK

Manufacturing Status Definitive Not Definitive Comments


Plant Plant is known since milestone contract
Assembly line Last conveyor is missing
Operators Personnel not fully trained

Process Instructions & Production facilities Definitive Not Definitive Comments


Control Plan / Process Flow Chart
Work Instructions Last control operation = control 100% until off tool/off process
Tooling
Inspection facilities (gauges…) Many controls not applicable yet
Specific facilities (production facilities…) Last conveyor is missing
Parameters / Process tuning To be confirmed after all conveyors fitting
Full Capacity facilities Test planned in two weeks
Cycle time

Tier N components identified as key critical (list & status) and their Status (Off Process, Off Tool, Proto)

Logistics & Packaging Definitive Not Definitive Comments


Packaging Specific delivery
Labels Specific marking for testing parts
Traceability Specific for PS testing parts

Supplier comments:

Definition agreed for specific application, OK for ABPT1

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved_Ver.3.0 1/2


ANPQP - INSPECTION REPORT

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc. Ref. No./Ver.:


Doc Rev. Date:
A B C OBD 2
R Doc. Origin Date:
Supplier Name: Supplier Code: E-mail:
Supplier Plant: Author: Tel:
Part Name: Control Plan Reference / Version:
Part No. & Issue Level: Average weight:
Design Note No. / DEVO: Serial / Batch No. / RAN:
Milestone: Part production date:

Dimensional Material Appearance Engineering Specification Testing Other

ANPQP criteria
(complete and submit ANPQP documentation)
No. Special Characteristic Nominal Lower Results (=number,pass,OK) Conformance
Upper Method of Measurement,
(match Character Specification Dimension Tolerance Not
Tolerance 1 2 3 4 5 OK Reports, or Comments
KFD) Symbol and Tolerance (numeric only) (use - sign) OK

1 Dimension
U1
QVCC 6-1 GAP 0.5 +0.6/-0.4 0.5 0.6 -0.4 1.0 1.0 0.8 1.1 0.8 OK CALIPER GAUGE

U2
QVCC 6-1 GAP 0.5 +0.6/-0.4 0.5 0.6 -0.4 1.0 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.4 OK CALIPER GAUGE

U3
QVCC 6-1 GAP 0.5 +0.6/-0.4 0.5 0.6 -0.4 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.6 0.4 OK CALIPER GAUGE

U1
QVCC 6-2 Deviation Max. 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.4 OK CALIPER GAUGE

U2
QVCC 6-2 Deviation Max. 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.4 OK CALIPER GAUGE

U3
QVCC 6-2 Deviation Max. 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.4 OK CALIPER GAUGE

S1
QVCC 6-3 GAP 0.5 +0.7/-0.4 0.5 0.7 -0.4 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.1 OK CALIPER GAUGE

S2
QVCC 6-3 GAP 0.5 +0.7/-0.4 0.5 0.7 -0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 OK CALIPER GAUGE

S3
QVCC 6-3 GAP 0.5 +0.7/-0.4 0.5 0.7 -0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.4 OK CALIPER GAUGE

S1
QVCC 6-4 Deviation Max. 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.4 OK CALIPER GAUGE

S2
QVCC 6-4 Deviation Max. 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 OK CALIPER GAUGE

S3
QVCC 6-4 Deviation Max. 1.0 1.0 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.4 OK CALIPER GAUGE

C1
QVCC 6-5 GAP 0.5 +0.7/-0.4 0.5 0.7 -0.4 0.8 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.6 OK CALIPER GAUGE

C2
QVCC 6-6 GAP 0.5 +0.7/-0.4 0.5 0.7 -0.4 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.6 0.6 OK CALIPER GAUGE

C2
QVCC 6-7 40 +0.25/-0.25 40 0.25 -0.25 40.1 40.1 40.1 40.0 40.0 OK CALIPER GAUGE

C2
QVCC 6-8 90 +0.3/-0.3 90 0.3 -0.3 90.1 90.0 89.9 89.9 90.1 OK CALIPER GAUGE
Component Parts (Clip ) Assembled Condition
2 OK OK OK OK OK OK VISUAL CHECK
no looseness, no missing, no breakage
Appearance colour, scratch, dent, thin paint, burr compare
3 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS OK VISUAL CHECK
to limit sample

Name: E . Bygum Position: QA Manager

Approval signature:
E. Bygum Date:
June 8th 2011

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved_Ver.3.0 2/2


Appearance Approval Report (AAR)

Key Point(s):

 The Appearance Approval Report (AAR) is a standard report form, to communicate information on product / part appearance.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The product / part to be reported upon will be agreed with the relevant Nissan department prior to submission and will normally be either:
 A product / part that has a grained or other textured finish.
 A product / part that has a painted or other coloured finish.

Note(s):

For Renault:
 The Appearance Approval is a Renault standard procedure; the supplier should refer to this standard to manage the appearance approval of the
product / part with the Renault relevant department:
 Shape approval of the visible body part see Renault norme 00 10 007
 Shape approval of the injection part see Renault norme 03 20 006
For NISSAN:
 This document shall be submitted at the following timing:
Trial Submission:
 The AAR is used to support the Parts Submission Warrant and a copy showing the Nissan OK signature must be submitted when
submitting the Warrant pack.
Post SOP submission:
 The AAR should be submitted upon Nissan request.

Output Document Description:

 Areas inside the bold lines are for Nissan completion only.
 Items marked * denotes if required by Nissan.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Item Completion guides
R / N Project Renault or Nissan Vehicle / Power train project for which the product is being developed / manufactured.
Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed / manufactured.
Renault - CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Document Reference No./ Version The suppliers reference no. and version no. for the document.

Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name Supplier company name.
Supplier Plant Location at which the product will be produced.
Supplier Code Unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault / Nissan Purchasing Dept.
Author The name of the person who created / revised the document
E-mail The E-mail address of the person who created / revised the document.
Tel The telephone number of the person who created / revised the document
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing
Part No. & Issue Level: As issued by Renault / Nissan design department
Design Note No. / DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed / manufactured.
Drawing No. As issued by Renault / Nissan design department
Reason for Submission Tick the appropriate box. If other is used add explanation of submission.
Color I.D. The color identification number used by Nissan.
Part No. Suffix The final potion of the part number that identifies the color of the product.
Master Number The identification number of the master plaque used for the measurement .
Material Type For self-colored submissions, the name of the material.
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
For painted / other colored finish submissions, the name of the substrate
For self-colored submissions, the source / manufacturer of the material.
Material Source
For painted / other colored finish submissions, the source / manufacturer of the paint / finish.
Grain depth * The average grain depth.
Numerical results (from color computer) for submitted parts.
Color Computer Data * Note:
Supplier should agree which method of color approval will be used with the relevant Nissan department.
If required by Nissan, the gloss meter reading.
Gloss *
Include make and model of the gloss meter in the comment area.
The color assessment against the master plaque.
Visual Color Assessment - Supplier Note:
Supplier should agree which method of color approval will be used with the relevant Nissan department.
Visual Color Assessment - Nissan Nissan will add their assessment
Visual Color assessment - OK / NG Nissan will add OK or NG as appropriate.
Comment Highlight any attached documents or other relevant information.
Supplier Signature Report approval signature of supplier's senior Quality Assurance department representative.
Position Position of signatory.
Nissan Signature Report approval signature of Nissan relevant department, where applicable.
Date Date of signature of report.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Example for painted or other colored finished product.

ANPQP - APPEARANCE APPROVAL REPORT

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
X46 Doc. Rev. Date: Aug 10th 2011
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: Jul 1st 2011
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: taro@mail.nissan.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Atsugi-Plant Author: Taro Nissan Tel: +81-(0)46-270-1894
Part Name: DOOR ASSY-BACK Drawing No: 80850 JD400-B121/B122
Part No. & Issue Level: 80850 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: A16796

Reason for Submission:

Part No. Master Material Material Grain Colour Computer Data Visual Colour Assessment
Colour I.D. Gloss Comment
Suffix Number Type Source Depth DL DA Db De CMC Supplier Nissan OK/NG
AB RZ:
PC74 JD400 24 PVC 0.15 0.12 0.3 0.356 0.323 +1 Dark, +1 Blue +2 Dark, +1 Red OK
company 160.5
AB Rmax:
PC74 JD400 24 PVC 0.15 0.12 0.3 0.356 0.323 +1 Dark, +1 Blue +2 Dark, +1 Red OK
company 185.6
AB RZ:
PG05 JD401 09 PVC 0.1 0.01 0.09 0.135 0.091 +2 Light, +1 Blue +3 Light, +2 Blue OK
company 160.5
AB Rmax:
PG05 JD401 09 PVC 0.1 0.01 0.09 0.135 0.091 +2 Light, +1 Blue +3 Light, +2 Blue OK
company 185.5
AB RZ:
PK30 JD402 47 PVC 0.23 0.01 0.36 0.427 0.36 +1 Dark, +1 Blue +2 Dark, +1 Red OK
company 160.5
AB Rmax:
PK30 JD402 47 PVC 0.23 0.01 0.36 0.427 0.36 +1 Dark, +1 Blue +2 Dark, +1 Red OK
company 185.5
AB RZ:
PC80 JD403 22 PVC 0.09 0.17 0.19 0.27 0.255 +2 Light, +1 Blue +3 Light, +2 Blue OK
company 160.5
AB Rmax:
PC80 JD403 22 PVC 0.09 0.17 0.19 0.27 0.255 +2 Light, +1 Blue +3 Light, +2 Blue OK
company 185.5

Supplier Signature: E. Bygum Position: QA Manager Nissan Signature: Date:

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved 1/2


Example for grained or other textured finished product.

ANPQP - APPEARANCE APPROVAL REPORT

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
X46 A B C OBD
Doc. Rev. Date: Aug 10th 2011
R 2
Doc. Origin Date: Jul 1st 2011
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: taro@mail.nissan.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Atsugi-Plant Author: Taro Nissan Tel: +81-(0)46-270-1894
Part Name: BOX ASSY-GLOBE Drawing No: 76850 JD400-B121/B122
Part No. & Issue Level: 76850 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T04896

Reason for Submission:

Part No. Master Material Material Grain Colour Computer Data Visual Colour Assessment
Colour I.D. Gloss Comment
Suffix Number Type Source Depth DL DA Db De CMC Supplier Nissan OK/NG
Comfirmation in coloring
JAA 1C*0* 706-505 P,P XYZ corp. - -0.8 -0.7 -0.4 1.2 92 Compared to colo mastar:OK
judgement meeting:OK OK
Comfirmation in coloring
NAE 1C*1* 706-506 P,P XYZ corp. - -1.6 -0.4 -1.1 1.9 90 Compared to colo mastar:OK
judgement meeting:OK OK
Comfirmation in coloring
K23 1C*2* 401-516 P,P XYZ corp. - -2.0 0.3 0.5 2.1 100 Compared to colo mastar:OK
judgement meeting:OK OK
Comfirmation in coloring
K51 1C*3* 508-507 P,P XYZ corp. - 0.6 -0.1 0.5 0.8 90 Compared to colo mastar:OK
judgement meeting:OK OK
Comfirmation in coloring
K52 1C*4* 508-508 P,P XYZ corp. - -1.2 0.1 -0.2 1.2 91 Compared to colo mastar:OK
judgement meeting:OK OK
Comfirmation in coloring
KH3 1C*5* 87-18158 P,P XYZ corp. - 0.2 0.1 -0.4 0.4 88 Compared to colo mastar:OK
judgement meeting:OK OK
Comfirmation in coloring
QAA 1C*6* 610-509 P,P XYZ corp. - 0.23 -0.3 1.7 1.7 88 Compared to colo mastar:OK
judgement meeting:OK OK
Comfirmation in coloring
CAC 1C*7* 708-506 P,P XYZ corp. - -0.3 -0.6 -2.0 2.1 94 Compared to colo mastar:OK
judgement meeting:OK OK

Supplier Signature: E. Bygum Position: QA Manager Nissan Signature: Date:

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved 2/2


7. PRODUCTION PART APPROVAL

Category Purpose:

 Confirm that off-process products meet Renault-Nissan targets at full volume condition.

Element Activity:

 7.1 Production Part Approval

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
7.1 Production Part Approval
Purpose:

 Confirm that product and mass production process and mass production capacity meet Renault/Nissan requirements and get Production Part
Approval.

Note(s):

 Mass production starting in supplier is not acceptable until Production Part Approval is provided.
 Shipment to Renault / Nissan of product is not acceptable until Production Part Approval is provided.
 Renault/ Nissan not fully approve PSW until report of Confirmation of full volume conditions is provided.
 Advanced information must be provided if full approval is not expected in line with Renault / Nissan requirements.
 If the Renault/ Nissan PSW judgment is "Interim approval" or "Rejected", the supplier shall develop countermeasures in order to achieve full
"Approval" status.
 Master Samples from all tool suites or cavities must be retained at the supplier for the life of the product.

Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity  Complete and submit the Part Submission Warrant (PSW ) with all supporting
Content  If a change occurs, follow the
documentation necessary to confirm satisfactory completion of the requirements of
change management
ANPQP.
requirements.
 The submission date is defined in the Supplier Master Schedule (SMS).
Output
 Part Submission Warrant (PSW)
Document

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number


 7.3 Design and development
 7.5 Production and service provision

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Part Submission Warrant (PSW)

Key Point(s):

 The Part Submission Warrant (PSW) is a document that affirms the ability of the supplier to deliver products that meet Renault/ Nissan
requirements.
 The ANPQP Part Submission Warrant is a summary document and should be accompanied by the documents required by Renault/ Nissan.
 The supplier will agree these documents with Renault/ Nissan prior to submission of the warrant.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 A separate PSW shall be raised for:


 each part number or group of part numbers relating to a part family.
 each supplier plant location.
 each Renault/Nissan assembly plant and/or facility.
 A new PSW shall be raised following the introduction of new equipment/ tooling/production facility.
 If the PSW applies to a specific manufacturing line, this should be clearly stated in the 'Details/Other' field.

Output Document Description:

Item Completion Instructions


Supplier Name Common usage name of company
R / N Project Renault or Nissan Vehicle / Power train project for which the product has been developed /
manufactured.
Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed / manufactured.
Renault - CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Document Reference No. The Suppliers reference no. for the document.
Supplier Name Supplier Company name.
Supplier Plant Location at which the product was produced.
Supplier Code Unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault /Nissan Purchasing Dept.
Author The name of the person who completed the document

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
E-mail The E-mail address of the person who created / revised the document.
Tel The telephone number of the person who completed the document
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing
Part No. & Issue Level: As issued by Renault/Nissan design department.
If the PSW covers more than one part number, complete the part number details sheet and attach it to
the PSW.
Design Note No. / DEVO The design note number relating to the product that has been manufactured
Drawing No. As issued by Renault/Nissan design department
Control Plan Reference / Version The reference and the issue level of the Control Plan used for the manufacture of the parts.
Control Plan Revision Date The date that the control plan was revised/ re-issued.
Average Weight The average weight of five parts, in kilograms.
R / N Plant The Renault/Nissan assembly plant that will use the parts.
First Part Delivery Date The date on which the first parts covered by the PSW will arrive in the relevant Renault/Nissan plant
and/or facility.
Reason for submission Tick the appropriate box(es).
Details / Other Any appropriate information to explain the reason for submission.
Items attached to this Submission Tick the appropriate box(es).
Warrant For each supporting document, indicate the issue level and date on an attached list
Submission Acceptability Tick the appropriate box(es).
Tick the Yes / No boxes as applicable. If "No", add an explanation.
Declaration Sign to confirm statement including printed name, position and date.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
ANPQP - PART SUBMISSION WARRANT

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc. Ref. No.: 12345
711
A B C OBD 2
R
Supplier Name: Quality Products S.A. Supplier Code: A497 E-mail: e-wilsy@qa-p.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Barcelona Author: E. L. Wisty Tel: +34 289 47 91 46
Part Name: Trim Finisher Control Plan Reference / Version: CP J81-E612 Version 3
Part No. & Issue Level: 94258 JD100 Control Plan Revision Date: 07/10/2011
Design Note No. / DEVO: T04896 Average Weight: 3.300kg
Drawing No: 94258 JD100-B1 R / N Plant Nissan Tochigi
First Part Delivery Date: 01/02/2012

Initial Submission Process Change Tooling Change Details / Other:


Reason for
Design Change Sub-Supplier Change Tooling Refurbishment/Replacement
submission
Material Change Location Change Re-submission

Items attached to this Submission Warrant:


Control Plan Engineering Drawings Part Number Details
Process Flow Chart Component Supply Chain Chart Logistics and Packaging Data Sheet
Inspection Report (including IMDS ID) Gauge Specification / Approval Report Design / Process / Facility Change Request
Supplier Test Plan & Report Sub-components PSW or equivalent Full Volume Confirmation Audit Result
Process Capability Study Result Parts Capacity Submission Warrant (Renault Only)
Appearance Approval Report (Nissan Only) Design Note Other

For each supporting document, indicate the issue level and date on an attached list.

Submission Acceptability
Dimensional Requirements OK The results meet all drawing and specification requirements: YES NO
Appearance Requirements OK
Material Requirements OK If NO, explanation required:
Functional Requirements OK
Statistical Process Data OK
Component Marking OK
Full Volume Confirmation Audit Result OK

Declaration
I confirm that the samples covered by this documentation are representative of production parts and have been manufactured to the relevant
drawings and specifications with no off-standard operations in the production process. Any deviations from this declaration are as follows:

Name: E. L. Wisty Position: Quality Manager

Signature: E. L. Wisty Date: 12/12/2011

RENAULT / NISSAN APPROVAL


Approved Interim Approval Rejected

Name: Name:

Position: Position:

Signature: Signature:

Date: Date:

Note: Approval by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities

RENAULT / NISSAN COMMENT (mandatory in the case of Interim Approval or Rejection):

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


8. NON-CONFORMING PRODUCT MANAGEMENT

Category Purpose:

 Implement a process that provides prompt and systematic activities to:


 identify the root cause of the concern,
 implement robust countermeasures for identified Non-Conforming product
 prevent further delivery of Non-Conforming Product.

Element Activity:

 8.1 Non-Conforming Product Management

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
8.1 Non-Conforming Product Management

Activity Purpose:

 Renault-Nissan requests the suppliers to provide product with zero defects.


 However, when non conforming product is identified, the supplier must have a process that provides prompt and systematic activities to
identify the root cause of the concern, implement robust countermeasures and prevent delivery of further suspect product.

Notes:

 Non-conforming product can be identified by Renault-Nissan at any time.


 If the supplier identifies that non-conforming product may have been shipped to Renault-Nissan, they shall inform all relevant
Renault-Nissan departments immediately and advise details of the non-conformance and countermeasure(s) taken.
 In case of quality crisis (recurrence, high incident level….), Renault-Nissan may request Firewall activities to the supplier to guarantee
customers’ protection and the improvement/efficiency of inspection standard.
 Basic rules of Firewall activities are:
 What : Additional inspection to prevent non-conformities outflow to customer
 Where: After final inspection of normal End of line test process, Off-line, separate and independent from the normal production process.
 How: Maintain the Documents (e.g. Inspection instruction, judgment criteria, inspection record, control chart etc.), secure the necessary
environment (Lighting level, noise level etc.), prepare additional red box.
 Who: Inspected by the certified inspector.
 Ability for detection: Confirm the skill of inspection regularly.
 Effectiveness: Monitor the detection situation of the nonconformities (Outflow to customer, outflow to final & additional controls)
 Monitor quality of components (follow-up temporary countermeasures at sub-supplier) – if the case.
 Exit Criteria: Set conditions for the activity release (e.g. 0 outflows to customer, 0 outflows to additional inspection process for 3 consecutive
months etc.).
 Renault-Nissan may audit the supplier as a part of Firewall activity and request to improve in case of an insufficient countermeasure.
 Supplier shall submit activity report (e.g. result to monitor the issue detection) by supplier own document if Renault-Nissan requests.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity Content  Protect Renault-Nissan from further deliveries of suspect product whilst maintaining supply,
 Identify and implement immediate temporary countermeasure(s),
 Identify the root cause(s) (of occurrence and of non-detection) using suitable methods (e.g. FTA, 5 WHY, etc.),
 Identify and implement permanent countermeasure(s) to prevent recurrence,
 Confirm the effectiveness of all countermeasures implemented and update relevant documents (e.g. FMEA, Control Plan, Work
Instructions, etc.)
 Assess the possibility of the non-conformance condition being applicable to other similar product,
 Apply the countermeasure to other similar parts/ processes (horizontal deployment)
Output  8D Concern & Countermeasure Report Summary
Document

ISO/TS16949 Reference number:


 8.3 Control of nonconforming product


 8.5 Improvement

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
8D Concern and Countermeasure Report Summary (8D-CCRS)

Key Point(s):

 The 8D Concern and Countermeasure Report Summary is the summary of the actions taken to resolve a concern using the 8D (Discipline)
process.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 Complete all 8 sections of the report following the completion instructions given below and submit to Renault-Nissan-Nissan.
 The 8D Concern and Countermeasure Report Summary shall be supported by evidence of investigation activities (e.g. Fault Tree Analysis (FTA),
Cause & Effect diagrams, detailed countermeasure implementation timing plans etc.).
 The minimum investigation activity required is a 5 Why analysis covering 4M (Man, Material, Machine, Method).
 For each submission, the 8D Concern and Countermeasure Report Summary document must be approved & dated.

Output Document Description:

Item Completion Instructions


Supplier Name Common usage name of company
Supplier code Code unique to each supplier, issued by Renault-Nissan Purchase department.
Part Number As specified on the drawing
Part Name The Part Name specified on the drawing
Completed by The name of the supplier company representative who completed the 8D-CCR
The position of the supplier company representative (should be quality director or above) who authorized the
Job title
release of the 8D-CCR
Date The date the 8D-CCR was completed
Authorized by The name of the supplier company representative who authorized the release of the 8D-CCR
Job title The position of the supplier company representative who authorized the release of the 8D-CCR
Date The date the 8D-CCR was approved for release.
Rev The Suppliers reference no. and version no. for the document.
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
1 Concern details
Report No. The reference number of the Renault-Nissan complaint to which the 8D-CCR relates.
Alert Date The date when the concern has been declared by Renault-Nissan to the Supplier
Affected model The vehicle/ powertrain model number(s) affected by the concern product
Rank The rank of the concern identified on the Renault / Nissan Complaint which relates to this concern
The total number of parts at Renault-Nissan affected by the concern which relates to this 8D-CCR.
Parts Qty. This quantity shall be updated according to Renault-Nissan information until Step 4 has been
implemented and confirmed.
A description of the concern highlighted via the Renault-Nissan complaint containing all relevant
information.
Description
Include the lot number reference and attach the 5 W1H.
With photograph or sketch
Tick relevant box (Yes / No) to indicate whether this concern has been identified on a previous
Recurrence complaint from Renault-Nissan. A concern is recurrent if it has the same cause as a previous one and
concerns the same part number.
2 Similar part consideration
A prompt list to ensure that consideration has been given to other similar parts and processes, stock,
work in progress etc. Answer each prompt by adding a tick to the relevant box (Yes / No). If the
Can the concern appear on other parts?
response is Yes, an outline comment is required. If the concern can occur in other Renault-Nissan
plants, this must be clearly identified.
3 - Initial analysis
Where should the non-conforming parts A prompt to ensure that consideration has been given to non-conformance detection failure. Answer
have been detected? each prompt by adding a tick to the relevant box (Yes / No)
Reason for non-detection? The reason why the failure was not detected in the expected control area of the supplier process.
4 - Temporary Countermeasure - Immediate
Describe the containment countermeasure actions taken to prevent the delivery of non-conforming
product to Renault-Nissan. Include the total quantity of product that this action has been applied to.
What actions have been taken to prevent Attach details to the 8D-CCR.
the delivery of non-conforming parts to A prompt to ensure consideration has been given to the action required to prevent delivery of
Renault-Nissan plants? non-conforming parts to Renault-Nissan. In the 'Action' box, detail the actions taken e.g. 100%
inspection, lot sampling.
The actions realized in the logistic platforms of the customer shall be indicated in the line “Warehouse

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
stock Customer”.
Qty. OK / NOK Insert the OK quantities or the NOK quantities found during containment.
Describe the containment countermeasure actions taken to prevent the delivery of non-conforming
Temporary Countermeasure Details product to Renault/ Nissan. Include the total quantity of product that this action has been applied to.
Attach details to the 8D CCR if necessary.
Indicate the method / mark / identification used to identify the product that is the subject of the
How are OK parts identified?
temporary countermeasure.
Label of first OK parts shipment & Delivery The delivery date and delivery identification code of the 1st delivery of OK product. This will allow
Date Renault-Nissan to identify and manage the introduction of OK delivered product.
The delivery date and delivery identification code of the 1st delivery of OK product. This will allow
Remarks Renault / Nissan to identify and manage the introduction of OK delivered product.
Type in supplier comment if any
5 - Final analysis
Date of analysis end The date when the analysis has been finished.
The analysis must address two questions at the same time:
1. Why was the non-conformity made?
2. Why was the non-conformity not detected?
Real / Root Causes of Concern in Process
A description of the real root cause(s) of the non-conformance.
Note: The term process includes all direct and indirect processes. Any appendices to the 8D-CCR
should also be referenced in this section.
Resp. The name of the management level company representative responsible for the non-conformance.
Dept. The department responsible for the non-conformance
6 - Permanent countermeasure
Application Date The date when the action plan is validated (end of step 6)
A description of the countermeasure to be implemented to permanently prevent the non-conformance
Actions
being repeated in the future.
The name of the management level company representative responsible for the implementation of the
Resp.
countermeasure.
Dept. The department responsible for the implementation of the countermeasure
Date When will the countermeasure be implemented
7 - Countermeasure confirmation
Validation Date The date that the countermeasure will be confirmed as effective and efficient
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Has the countermeasure been confirmed Tick relevant box to indicate whether the countermeasure has been confirmed as effective or not (Yes /
as effective? No).
Detail the manner in which the countermeasure has been confirmed as effective. Attach any relevant
How?
information (dimensional reports, capability results…)
Number of the parts found in supplier
Fill in number of the parts found in supplier manufacturing process.
process
Number of the parts found in R-N plant Fill in number of the parts found in Renault-Nissan plant
8 – Follow-up action
A prompt to ensure consideration has been given to any further actions that may be required in
reference to the reported non-conformance. This shall include a review and update of all related
Follow-up action documentation.
Tick the 'Yes' box if the document will be updated. Include the name / dept. of the responsible person
and the timing.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
8D - CONCERN AND COUNTERMEASURE REPORT SUMMARY (8D-CCR)
Supplier Name Supp Supplier code 1234567 Completed by M. Me Authorized by M. Lautre
Part name PLASTIC LEFT WING Job title Manufacturing Quality Job title Quality Manager
Part Number 77000000 Date 2008/03/07 Rev N Date 08/03/08
1 - Concern detail 4 - Temporary countermeasure - Immediate 6 - Permanent countermeasure Application date 2008/6/1
Report No. 20007/DD Alert Date 2004/8/4 What actions have been taken to prevent the delivery of nonconforming parts What actions have been taken to prevent the manufacture of non-conforming parts
Affected model X6666 to Renault-Nissan plants? (such as fool proffing, testing, process control)
Rank B Parts Qty. 1236 Qty Actions Resp. Dpt Date
Actions
OK NOK 1) Make maintenance standard Manufacturin 2008/05/30
Description Scratch on surface GM
Work in progress 100% visual inspection 300 40 g
Who Renault plant QA found Stores stock 100% visual inspection 100 10 2) Operator training by new standard SD Manufacturin 2008/05/29
What Scratch on surface of the part Warehouse stock 100% visual inspection 0 0 g
Where Renault vehicle assembleprocess Service parts Not Appricable 0 0 3) Process audit ND Quality 2008/05/30
When 2014/12/2 Others
How At final inspection 4)
Why AVES V1
Sketch or picture 5)

6)

7)

8)

9)
Yes No
Recurrence How are OK parts identified ? Attached green mark on the back of part 7 - Countermeasure confirmation Validation date : 2008/07/01
2 - Similar part consideration Label of first OK parts shipment 123123 Has the countermeasure been confirmed as effective? Yes No
Can the concern appear on other parts ? Delivery date 2004/8/8 Remarks : None
Yes No Comments/results 5 - Final Analysis Date of analysis end 2008/5/15 How?
Other models X34 Real root causes of concern in process : Check the issue detection level. Suspect parts were 100% rejected based on the
Generic parts l Man, Material, Machine, Method standard.
Other colours All colours l Who, Where, When Why, How
Opposite hand Right wing l Process settings, rework
Front/rear l Maintenance Number of the parts found in supplier process 600
Others Causes Resp Dept. Number of the parts found in R-N plant 500
1) In-correct stripping GB Manufacturing Attach relevant data (e.g: Dimensional report, Capabilty study, Atribute Yes
data, Fault Tree analysis & 5why analysis etc.)
3 - Initial analysis 2) Undefined rework process Manufacturing 8 - Follow-up action Date to finish act.
SD
Where should the non-conforming parts have been detected ? Do any of the following require action as a Yes Resp. (Dept) Timing
Yes No 3) Undefined package mainteanance Logistics result of this concern ?
CD
During process/manufacture In house work/inspection instructions ND (Manufacturing) 2008/06/30
Afetre manufacture (e.g final inspection) 4) Process Flowchart GD (Manufacturing) 2008/06/30
Prior to dispatch Control plan / chart ND (Manufacturing) 2008/06/30
Reason for non detection ? 5) FMEA GD (Manufacturing) 2008/06/30
Auto-control operation have not been executed although it is written in Drawings
the control plan. Level 1 audits have not been achieved. 6) Gage
Others (investigation, pokayoke…)
7) Sub-supplier follow-up

8)

Copyright (C) Renault-NISSAN All Rights Reserved_Ver.3.0


9. CHANGE MANAGEMENT

Category Purpose:

 Manage potential risks associated with changes to product design and process/facility site.

Element Activity:

 9.1 Design Change Management


 9.2 Process/ Facility Site Change Management

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
9.1 Design Change Management

Activity Purpose:

 To manage the introduction of design changes in order to ensure that there is no negative impact
on quality, cost or delivery.

Note(s):

 The scope of Design Change Management covers all design changes made by the tier 1 supplier
or their supply chain.
 Design change includes any change affecting the form, fit, function, performance and/or durability
of a part. Examples of design changes include below (but are not limited to):
 Changes mechanism or structure
 Changes electrical function
 Changes material (including supporting material such as grease, paint, welding rod etc.)
 Changes dimensions or mass
 Changes sub-component layout
 Changes affecting homologation/safety/regulation
 For software specific changes, the supplier shall declare actual areas of software to be modified
and any other software module contained within the control unit which may receive information
from the changed source.
 There are two types of design changes below;
 Design change instigated by Renault-Nissan
 Design change instigated by the supplier
 Authorization to proceed with any change is only given through the issue of an approved design
note by Renault-Nissan.
 If any modifications to gauges are required as a result of a design change, it shall be detailed in
the relevant Gauge Specification and Approval Sheet. (Refer to the “5.3 Tooling, Gauges and
Facility Management”)
 The shipment to Renault-Nissan of changed product is not acceptable until a Parts Submission
Warrant (PSW) has been submitted and approved. (Refer to the “7.1 Production Part Approval”)
 If the tier 1 supplier or their sub-suppliers would like to make a change, the tier 1 supplier shall
submit a Design Change Request (DCR) document to the relevant Renault-Nissan department.
 Design change request shall be submitted to Renault-Nissan at least 30 days before the date of
the change, unless otherwise agreed with Renaud/Nissan.
 The supplier shall ensure that all requests for design changes are authorized by Renault-Nissan
prior to any change taking place.

Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity  Perform risk analysis on the proposed design change.
Content  Complete the relevant change request document and submit to the relevant
Renault-Nissan design department.
 If requested, participate in Joint Design Review with Renault-Nissan.
Output  Design Change Request (DCR)
Document
Supplier Renault-Nissan

Make & Submit a Design Change Request


Design Change Request
(DCR)

Review

DR DR is required?
Yes
No

Amend proposal? Approve?


No

Yes
End (Cancel request)

Prepare CAD data with associated doc.

CAD data with


Associated documents
No
Approve?

Design Note/DEVO Yes

Implement activity to obtain approval for PSW

PSW with associated doc.

Approve?
No
Yes
Start mass production & deliver product

Notify completion
With associated doc.
End (Receive the product)

Output  Design Change Request (DCR)


Document

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number

 7.1 Planning of product realization (for example; 7.1.4 Change control)


 7.2 Customer-related processes (for example; 7.2.2 Review of requirements related to the
product)
 7.3 Design and development (for example; 7.3.5 Design and development review)
 7.4 Purchasing (for example; 7.4.1.1 Regulatory conformity)
Design Change Request (DCR)
Key Point(s):

 The Design Change Request (DCR) is the document used by the supplier to request Renault/Nissan agreement to proceed with formal drawing
submission.

Minimum Content Requirements

 The supplier shall provide all necessary information to describe and justify the change. This shall include:
 the reason for the change request (justification of the change)
 a full explanation of the change, complete with a list of associated parts
 a full explanation of the effects of the change on the associated parts
 a risk analysis and plan to manage all potential risks identified
 complete timing plan, including the anticipated first shipment date
 the cost effect of the change
 The Design Change Request (DCR) document shall only be submitted for design changes which are initiated by the supplier.

Output Document Description

Item Completion Instructions


R / N Project The Renault-Nissan Vehicle/Power train project for which the product is being
developed/manufactured.
Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed/manufactured.
Renault - CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Document Reference No./Version The suppliers reference No. and version No. for the document.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name The supplier name.
Supplier Plant The location at which the product will be manufactured.
Supplier Code A unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault-Nissan purchasing department.
Author The name of the person who created/revised the document.
E-mail The e-mail address of the person who created/revised the document.
Tel The telephone number of the person who created/revised the document.
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing.
Part No. & Issue Level: The part No. and issue level as issued by Renault/Nissan design department.
Design Note No./DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being manufactured.
Drawing No. As issued by the Renault-Nissan design department
Affected Vehicles(s)/ENG/Unit(s) References of the Renault-Nissan vehicles affected by the proposed change.
DETAIL OF CHANGE (Supplier)
1. Reason for Request Tick "Tier 1" if the changed product is developed by tier 1 supplier.
Tick "Tier N" if the changed product is developed by tier N supplier.
Type of change/Tick the type of design change.
Number of affected plant(s) / List of affected The total number and names/ locations of Alliance plants requiring delivery of parts subject to the
plant(s) proposed design change.
2. Explanation of Change Detailed explanation of the proposed design change and how it will be accomplished.

3. Explanation of Process / Facility Site Change Detailed explanation of how the change or relocation will be accomplished. (Include Why, Where
from / to)
4. Risk Analysis of Change Detailed report (and countermeasure plan as required) based upon the suppliers own risk assessment of the
impact of the change on the product. Complete and issue a Risk Table as part of request submission.
5. Timing Plan Details Summary of timing to change the process/facility change (Append copy of the timing plan)
6. Cost Impacts Detailed cost impacts for the product, tooling and logistics.
(attached material if necessary such as “F4-sheet”)
7. How will Quality and Capacity Requirements be A clear statement is required from the supplier, which details how supply to the Renault/Nissan plants
Assured? will be safe-guarded during the transition phase of changing the process/ relocating the facility to its
new location. This may include contingency planning, additional inspection confirmations, safety
stock build program and/or allocated capacity at a different facility to protect planned output.
8. Other(s) Any item considered by the supplier to be relevant and / or unique, in order to support the particular
change request.
AGREEMENT TO PROCEED WITH FORMAL DRAWING SUBMISSION (Renault/Nissan)

NOTIFICATION OF COMPLETION (Supplier)


Date of PSW approval Date when PSW was approved by the department in charge.
Date of first production shipment into Renault/Nissan The delivery date, when the first shipment of production parts into the Renault/Nissan.
Reference The delivery reference number etc., which uniquely identifies the first shipment of production parts
into the Renault/Nissan.
ANPQP - DESIGN CHANGE REQUEST (DCR)
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR 1 Supplier Doc. Ref.: 11111
A B C OBD S Renault/Nissan Ref. Doc.:
X67B
R 2
Supplier Name: ABC Castings Supplier Code: A054 E-mail: d-mann@abc.co.jp
Supplier Plant: An Industrial Estate Author: D C Mann Tel: +44 1234 567 890
Part Name: Widget A Drawing No.: 12345 JD000-B1
Part No. & Issue Level: 12345 JD000 Affected Vehicle(s)/ENG/Unit(s):
ALL B platform vehicle
Design Note No. / DEVO: T07844
DETAIL OF CHANGE (Supplier) No. of Affected Plant(s):
1. Reason for Request: 2
1) Change at 2) Type of Change List of affected Plant(s):
-Tochigi
Tier 1 specification Mechanism or structure Homologation
-Canton
Material Electrical function
Supporting material
Tier N specification Dimensions or
(Solvent , lubricant,...) Other
mass change

2. Explanation of Change:
Reduce the height of flange 'Y' from 3.8mm to 3.5mm to eliminate foul condition. Drawing attached showing proposed modification.
Note: This has been verbally agreed with both affected customer plant QA and PE departments.

3. Associated Parts and Effect: 4. Risk Analysis of Change:


12345 JD000 There is a possibility of bending strength reduction for the flange area. However,
Effect as described above we have confirmed through DV testing that parts with the reduced

5. Timing Plan Details (append copy of Timing Plan): 6. Cost Impacts (Product,Tooling,Logistics):
See attached timing plan Product : -€0.25 per CAR set
Note: This plan has been discussed with both affected customer plan Tooling : +€300
change control departments. Logistics : No effect

7. How will Quality and Capacity Requirements be Assured? 8. Other(s):


(Include details of any planned safety stock):
See attached plan.

Name: D C Mann Position: Project Engineer Date: 6th Jan.2015 Signed: D C mann
NOTE: Design Review needs to be done by the supplier before submit the request to Renault/Nissan
AGREEMENT TO PROCEED WITH FORMAL DRAWING SUBMISSION (Renault/Nissan)

Design Change NOT Agreed because of Agreement Withhold


Subject to completion / submission of the Agreement to proceed with drawing submission.
the reason described below.
requirement requested below.

Renault/Nissan request: Design Note/DEVO# :


Note
Full Process DR is required
Not only below documents (if click) but also the other attachment
Quick DR is required material shall be confirmed with the Part Submission Warrant (PSW)
approver.
Other (See below box)
Supplier Test Plan and Report (STR)

Process Capability Study Result


Reason for "NOT Agreed" or other requirement:
Other(s):

Name: Position: Date: Signed:

Name: Position: Date: Signed:


NOTE: Approval by Renault/Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.
NOTIFICATION OF COMPLETION (Supplier):

Date of PSW approval: 27th Jan.2015 Date of first production shipment into Renault/Nissan: 23th Feb.2015

Reference:

Name: D C Mann Position: Project Engineer Date: 6th Jan.2015 Signed: D C mann
We hereby warrant that the process change has been carried out in the line with the requirements detailed in this process change plan,
and that the product will meet all appropriate Renault/Nissan specifications and requirements

THE SUPPLIER SHALL SUBMIT A PART SUBMISSION WARRANT (PSW) PRIOR TO THE DELIVERY OF
PRODUCT AFFECTED BY THE CHANGE

Copyright (C) Renault-NISSAN All Rights Reserved_Ver.3.0


9.2 Process/ Facility Site Change Management
Purpose:

 To manage the introduction of the process/facility site changes in order to ensure that there is no negative impact on supplier products.
(The scope of the Process/Facility Site Change Management covers all changes made by the Tier 1 supplier or their supply chain.)

Note(s):

 The supplier shall have a change management system which includes, schedule for the changes, risk analysis & management, product
verification & validation activities.
 Once the adoption of the change is confirmed as successful, mass production part approval from the Renault-Nissan is necessary before
shipment of any change affected product.
 The supplier shall ensure that all requests for the Process/Facility site changes are authorized by the Renault-Nissan prior to any change taking
place.
 The Tier 1 supplier or their sub-supplier shall not carry out any process/facility site changes during Phase 4 and Phase 5 Ramp-Up.
(The facility site provided for the "off-process" condition shall be in line with that agreed at the supplier sourcing confirmation.)
 If the Tier 1 supplier or their sub-suppliers will make a process/facility site change, the Tier 1 supplier shall submit a Process/ Facility Site
Change Request document to the relevant Renault-Nissan department. Example of changes that require the Renault-Nissan authorization
includes below;(Routine planned maintenance activities such as Total Preventative Maintenance (TPM) do not require the application of the
Process/ Facility Site Change management activity.)
 The Process / Facility Site Change Request document shall be submitted to the first customer in Renault/ Nissan, if effect for the several
number of plant in Renault/ Nissan.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Example of changes Remark
Site
Relocate/Move to outside
To an another parent company
To an another company
Relocation/Move in house
Change process layout
Change production line (inc. inspection process)
Newly-established or Extra production line (inc. inspection process)
Machine/Equipment on the production line
Install new machine/equipment
Change machine/equipment condition/parameter (inc. to be changed document standard)
Modification (to meet the requirement)
Mold/Die
Make new (inc. replacement)
Modification (to meet the requirement)
Tool
Make new (inc. replacement)
Modification (to meet the requirement)
Inspection/Measurement tool/equipment (inc. gauge)
Install new dedicated tool/equipment
Modify dedicated tool/equipment
Method
Production (e.g. welding, finishing, heating, assembly)
Machine set-up
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Operation (affect the process flow)
Newly-added inspection process
Change inspection method (e.g. from manual operation to new equipment)
Transportation in the site (Material handling)
Storing (for product, work-in-process, component, raw material)
Logistic & Packaging
Others
Sub-supplier (inc. sub-supplied indirect material such as cleaner, degreasing agent)
(But are not limited to)

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Timeline Supplier Renault-Nissan

Study process/facility site change To the first customer in


Renault/ Nissan
Process/Facility Site
-3 months Change Request

Review
Y
N N
Feasible? Approve?

Y
End (Cancel request)
Designate item for Part Submission Warrant
(PSW)
Review the action item & update the plan

Implement activity along with the plan

Production trial

Part Submission
Warrant (PSW)

Review

Audit (if necessary)

N
Approve?

Y
Start mass production & deliver product

End (Receive the product)


Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
 Plan the change and perform risk analysis.
 Complete and submit the Process / Facility Site Change Request document to Renault / Nissan for approval.
 Plan the change.
 Confirm the quality before and after change to ensure there is no deterioration
Activity Content  Update all documents and re-apply for PSW approval before the delivery of post-change parts, unless
otherwise agreed with Renault / Nissan.
 Notify Renault / Nissan of successful completion of the Process / Facility Site change by submission of
the final ‘Notification of Completion' section of the authorized Process / Facility Site Change Request
document.
Output
 Process /Facility Site Change Request
Document

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number

 7.1 Planning of product realization (for example; 7.1.4 Change control)


 7.2 Customer-related processes (for example; 7.2.2 Review of requirements related to the product)
 7.3 Design and development (for example; 7.3.5 Design and development review)
 7.4 Purchasing (for example; 7.4.1.1 Regulatory conformity)
 8.5 Improvement (for example; 8.5.1.2 Manufacturing process improvement)

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Process/Facility Site Change Request (PFCR)

Key Point(s):

 The Process/Facility Site Change Request is the document used by the supplier to request the Renault-Nissan approval to proceed with the
process/facility site change.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

The supplier shall provide all necessary information to describe and justify the change such as below;
 Change description and justification
 Complete timing plan, including the anticipated first shipment date
 Risk analysis and plan to manage all potential risks identified
 Plan to assure quality and capacity requirements
 List of the affected parts

Output Document Description:

Item Completion Instructions


R / N Project The Renault-Nissan Vehicle/Power train project for which the product is being
developed/manufactured.
Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed/manufactured.
Renault - CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Document Reference No./Version The suppliers reference No. and version No. for the document.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name The supplier name.
Supplier Plant The location at which the product will be manufactured
Supplier Code A unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault- Nissan purchasing department.
Author The name of the person who created/revised the document.
e-mail The e-mail address of the person who created/revised the document.
Tel The telephone number of the person who created/revised the document.
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing.
Part No. & Issue Level: The part No. and issue level as issued by Renault-Nissan design department.
Design Note No./DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being manufactured.
Drawing No. As issued by the Renault-Nissan design department
Affected Vehicles(s) References of the Renault-Nissan vehicles affected by the proposed change.
LUP No. (Renault only) (Reference to be added by Renault)
Number of affected R/N plants The total number and names/locations of the Renault-Nissan plants requiring delivery of parts
List of affected R/N plants produced from the process that is to be changed or relocated.
DETAIL OF CHANGE
1. Date of Proposed Change For a process change, the planned date for the process to be at full production capability
following the process change.
For a facility site change, the planned dates for the current facility cessation and the start-up
date of the new facility (include proposed date full production capability will be achieved in the
new location.)
2. Reason for Request Change at Chose appropriate layer of supplier chain, Tier 1 or Tier N.
Type of change Chose all the applicable check box for the proposed process/facility site change.
3. Explanation of Process / Facility Site Change Detailed explanation of how the change or relocation will be accomplished. (Include Why, Where
from / to)
4. Risk Analysis of Change Detailed report (and countermeasure plan as required) based upon the suppliers own risk assessment of
the impact of the change on the product. Complete and issue a Risk Table as part of request submission.
5. Timing Plan Details Summary of timing to change the process/facility change (Append copy of the timing plan)
6. Predicted Date of Delivery to Customer(s) The supplier best forecast of the 1st production shipment to the affected Alliance Plant(s) after
completion of the change.
7. How will Quality and Capacity Requirements be A clear statement is required from the supplier, which details how supply to the Alliance plants
Assured? will be safe-guarded during the transition phase of changing the process/ relocating the facility to
its new location. This may include contingency planning, additional inspection confirmations,
safety stock build program and/or allocated capacity at a different facility to protect planned
output.
Any item considered by the supplier to be relevant and / or unique, in order to support the
8. Other(s)
particular change request.
Name Printed name of the responsible person at the supplier.
Position Position of the above signatory.
Date Date of the sign-off.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Signed Signature of the responsible person at the supplier.
APPROVAL TO PROCEED WITH PROCESS/FACILITY SITE CHANGE
Not Approved /Approved The Renault-Nissan will indicate the disposition of the request in terms of approval to proceed.
Part Submission Warrant If approval is indicated, the Renault-Nissan will indicate if a Part Submission Warrant (PSW) and
attachments are required to be submitted prior to any change.
The Renault-Nissan will specify which items they require to be submitted as attachments to the
Part Submission Warrant (PSW).
NOTIFICATION OF COMPLETION
Date of Completion Date when the process becomes start of production (SOP) after the process/facility change.
Date of First Production Shipment into The delivery date, when the first shipment of production parts into the Renault/Nissan.
Renault/Nissan
Reference of First Production Shipment into The delivery reference number, which uniquely identifies the first shipment of production parts
Renault/Nissan into the Renault/Nissan.
Signed Signature of the responsible person at the supplier.
Position Position of the above signatory.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
ANPQP - PROCESS / FACILITY SITE CHANGE REQUEST

R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Supplier Doc. Ref.: ECR00389
X11 Alliance Ref. No.:
A B C OBD 2
R
Supplier Name: Quality Products S.A. Supplier Code: 4D87 E-mail: e-wils@q-product.com
Supplier Plant: Madrid Author: E. L. Wisty Tel: +34 489 05 45 87
Part Name: Trim Finisher Drawing No.: 91457 XXXXX
Part No. & Issue Level: 91457 XXXXX Affected Vehicle(s): A11, B11, C11, D11, E11
Design Note No. / DEVO: T04587 LUP No. (Renault Only):

DETAIL OF CHANGE No. of affected R / N Plants:


3
1. Date of Proposed Change: Start production at new site - 01/03/11, Stop production at current site - 05/04/11
List of affected R / N Plants:
2. Reason for Request: -Nissan UK
1) Change at 2) Type of Change -Nissan Spain
Tier 1 Material Source Tooling Process Method Packaging -Renault France
Facility Site Gauge Storage Method Other
Tier N
Equipment Inspection Method Logistic

3. Explanation of Process / Facility Site Change (for Facility Site Change include Why Where from / to):
Set up of new facility in Chennai with staggered transfer of current production from Spanish plant to new plant. New
facility to have direct copy of existing processes and equipment in Spain

4. Risk Analysis of Change: Criteria Y N


Risk has been considered as minimal. Strategy detail document attached to justify this decision. Main Is Important / homologation specific feature affected? X
considerations are: Is a new tool or process required? X
1. Set up of new facility for higher complexity items with copy tools prior to switching off current facility. Does the change introduce a new manufacturing site
X
2. Appropriate stock builds for all part numbers including 1 month contingency stock. or new second tier manufacturing site?
5. Timing Plan Details (append copy of Timing Plan):
See attached timing plan. Main milestones are 1) Commissioning of new facility, 2) Commissioning of equipment and tooling, 3) Buy-off high risk
processes (QCD), 4) Internal production trials in Chennai, 5) Stock builds at current facility, 6) Stock build and Ok part confirmation / containment in
Chennai
6. Predicted Date of Delivery to Customer(s):
Nissan UK - 01/05/08
Nissan Spain - 05/05/08
Renault France - 06/05/08
7. How will Quality and Capacity Requirements be Assured? (Include details of any planned safety stock):
Safety stock for high risk items is planned for 1 month at both Renault and Nissan plus 1 month contingency at current site. Safety stock for low risk
items is 14 working days plus 1 month contingency. Capacity at new facility will be 50% higher than current plant - see attached capacity plans and stock
build / usage data for information.
8. Other(s):

Name: E. L. Wisty Position: Quality Manager Date: 2011/12/1 Signed: E L Wisty


Note: This document should be submitted to Renault / Nissan (as appropriate) at least 3 months before the Date of the Proposed Change

APPROVAL TO PROCEED WITH PROCESS / FACILITY SITE CHANGE Renault Unique R / N use only
Parts DCL-Logistics and Packaging Data Sheet
NOT APPROVED
Control Plan Supplier EDI Agreement
Process Flow Chart EDI Submission Warrant
APPROVED Nissan Unique
Inspection Report
Product Validation Test Report Appearance Approval Report
Part Submission Warrant (PSW)
Process Capability Study Result Completed DRBFM Worksheet

Engineering Drawings Packaging Specification

Component Supply Chain Chart (CSCC) Logistic Data

Gauge Specification & Approval Sheet Material Certification

Submit Part Submission Updated Production Capacity Plan


Warrant to Renault / Nissan
Audit by Renault and / or Nissan
together with attachments Other Requirement
indicated prior to shipment Process FMEA
of post-change product

Signed: Position: Date:


Signed: Position: Date:
Signed: Position: Date:
Signed: Position: Date:
Note: Approval by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities

NOTIFICATION OF COMPLETION

Date of Completion: Date of First Production shipment into Renault / Nissan:


Reference of First Production Shipment into Renault / Nissan:
Name: Position: Date: Signed:
We hereby warranty that the process change / facility transfer has been carried out in line with the requirements detailed in this Process / Facility Change Request
document, and that the product will meet all appropriate Renault / Nissan specifications and requirements.

Copyright (C) Renault/NISSAN All Rights Reserved


10. LOGISTICS & PACKAGING

Category Purpose:

 Implement Renault/Nissan specific requirements for logistics & packaging.

Element Activity:

 10.1 Logistics & Packaging

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
10.1 Logistics & Packaging

Activity Purpose:

 Select the best logistics option & packaging specifications to ensure the conformity of the product is preserved.

Note(s):

 The documentation used to communicate the content of this activity with Renault/ Nissan is specific by each company.
 The specific requirements are outside the scope of ANPQP.
 For detailed guidelines on specific requirements, see the “Other Supply Requirement” on ASG (Alliance Supplier Guide))

Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity  Propose the logistics  Review and optimize  Review related  Confirm and validate the  If a change will occur,
Content and packaging the logistics route and documents and update packaging specification contact to
specification to be packaging if necessary. meets the requirements Renault/Nissan plant or
used.
specification in line specified in the relevant facility and request the
with the latest documents. instruction.
Renault/Nissan
request.
Output  (RFQ Reply)  Logistics and Packaging Data Sheet
Document

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number

 7.4 Purchasing
 7.5 Production and service provision

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Logistics and Packaging Data Sheet (LPDS)

Key Point(s):

 The "Logistics and Packaging Data Sheet" is a document which is used to do the packaging specification.
 The supplier uses that form to make the choice of box and pallet or container, the number of parts in the packaging, the number of boxes on the
pallet. It also indicates the logistics costs.
 Renault/Nissan has to validate the data sent by the supplier. In case of rejection, Renault/Nissan will inform the supplier and negotiates a different
solution.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 Renault/Nissan has specific logistics and packaging requirements for each company.
 The supplier shall contact to relevant logistics & packaging department for information on their specific requirements.

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
11. ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENT

Category Purpose:

 Comply with laws and regulations in each country or region and with Renault & Nissan environment policies especially with Renault
Green Purchasing Guideline & Nissan Green Purchasing Guideline.

Element Activity:

 11.1 Environmental Requirement

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
11. 1 Environmental Requirement

Activity Purpose:

 Comply with laws and regulations and anticipate changes or trends in the laws and regulations in each country or region for the
following environmental issues,
- control the substances used in parts and vehicles and prevent the use of prohibited substances
- improve recycling and encourage the integration of recycled/renewable materials in an increasing number of parts
- control the cabin air quality

Note(s):

 The suppliers shall comply with laws and regulations and the following Renault-Nissan requirements concerning recycling and
environmental impacting substances and continuously improve the management of environment related issues.
for Renault: Renault-Nissan CSR Guidelines for Suppliers
RENAULT Green Purchasing Guideline
Standard 00-10-415, Renault Manufacture and supply of products general requirements
for Nissan : Renault-Nissan CSR Guidelines for Suppliers
Nissan Green Purchasing Guideline

 For each environmental issue, the suppliers shall comply with following Renault-Nissan requirements.

environmental issue For Renault For Nissan


1. Substance use  Standard 00-10-050 : Prohibited or Restricted
 NES M0301 "Substance Use Restrictions”
restrictions Substances List and Declaration Modes
 Nissan Green Purchasing Guideline 3)-2
2.Recyclability  Standard 00-10-098 : Recycling indicator
(Resource Circulation) Requirements
3.Material Marking  Standard 00-10-060 : Design for recycling  NES D0031 "Marking of Polymeric Parts”
 Nissan Green Purchasing Guideline 3)-1
4.Recycled material use  Standard 00-10-060 : Design for recycling (Resource Circulation) Recycled Material Usage
Expansion
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
 M0160 Method of Testing the Smell of Interior Parts
5.Cabin air quality  Product Specifications : 37-00-081 Passenger
 M0402 VOC test method of cabin parts
(VOC and Odor) compartment material and part emissions
 M0403 VOC of Cabin Parts

 The supplier shall input and submit International Material Data System (IMDS) data for all the parts and materials independently
of the vehicle shipment destination.
The suppliers shall refer to the following Renault-Nissan requirement when inputting IMDS data.

For Renault For Nissan


 00-10-050 Prohibited or Restricted
 NES M0301 "Substance Use Restrictions”
Substances List and Declaration Modes
IMDS input rule  NES M0302 "Substance Data Input
 80 - 00 – 044 IMDS Documentation Rule
Standard by IMDS"
For Renault Suppliers

Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity  Study the environmental issues not only  Input all the  Update the IMDS data.
Content to comply with regulatory requirements necessary
but also to comply with requests from information into
Renault-Nissan. IMDS.
Output  International Material Data System (IMDS)
Document

Note
” Material Investigation Report regarding the restriction of use of environment-impacting substances” shall be submitted, refer to
6.PRODUCT CONFIRMATION and 7.PRODUCTION PART APPROVAL.

ISO/TS 16949 Reference Number:

 7.3 Design and development


 7.4 Purchasing (for example; Regulatory conformity)

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
 7.5 Production and service provision (for example; 7.5.3 Identification and traceability)
 8.2 Monitoring and measurement (for example; 8.2.4 Monitoring and measurement of product)

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
International Material Data System (IMDS)

Key Point(s):

 The MDS (Material Data Sheet) describes the decomposition of the part in sub parts, each sub part being discomposed in
materials, each material in substances. This is required for each part designed for and supplied to Renault and/or Nissan.

Minimum Content Requirement(s):

 The suppliers shall comply with following Renault-Nissan requirement for the input of IMDS data.
For Renault: 00-10-050 Prohibited or Restricted Substances List and Declaration Modes
80 - 00 – 044 IMDS Documentation Rule For Renault Suppliers
For Nissan: NES M0301 "Substance Use Restrictions”
NES M0302 "Substance Data Input Standard by IMDS"

Output Document Description:

 International Material Data System (IMDS)


https://public.mdsystem.com/en/web/imds-public-pages/home

Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)


Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen