Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Bartok- Evidence
“Now I have a new plan: to collect the finest Hungarian folksongs and to raise
them, adding the best possible piano accompaniments, to the level of art-
song.” (Bartok cited in Szollosy, 1967: 99)
Melodic
Pentatonic melodies
Modal scales (Hungarian minor mode) Asymmetrical scales
Rhythmic
“Aksak" rhythms – additive vs divisive – 3+2 quavers Alternating time signatures
“The study of this peasant music was for me of decisive importance, for the reason
that it revealed to me the possibility of a total emancipation from the hegemony of
the major-minor system. For the largest and, indeed, the most valuable part of this
treasure-house of melodies lies in the old church modes, in ancient Greek and still
more primitive scales (notably the pentatonic), and also shows the most varied and
free rhythms and time-changes.” (Bartok cited in Griffiths, 1994:57)
Griffiths, P. (1994) Modern Music: A Concise History. 2nd edition. New York:
Thames & Hudson Ltd.
The rise of awareness of national identities is a key theme of the latter part of
the 19th century
In the arts in general, this is seen through an increasing interest in folk
heritage and conscious separation from perceived German hegemony
Bartok’s influence was initially as much as a collector and recorder of folk
music, but it became central to his entire musical language
Similar trends can be found in the work of composers across Europe
(examples include: Smetana, Dvorak, Janacek, Grieg, Sibelius etc.)
Nationalism: “A mus. movement which began during the 19th cent. and was marked
by emphasis on nat. elements in mus. such as folksongs, folk dances, folk rhythms
or on subjects for operas and symphonic poems which reflected nat. life or history.”
Kennedy, M. (ed.). (n.d.). Nationalism in Music. The Oxford Dictionary of Music.
Available Online:
http://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/subscriber/article/opr/t237/e7158 [Accessed
18/2/17]
• Cecil Sharp
English Folk Song: some conclusions
RVW was tasked with selecting the tunes for The English Hymnal, which
• “Recognizing that for most people, church attendance represented their only
regular opportunity for music-making, he set aside any theological scruples in
order to focus on this crucial venue for amateur singing.” (Onderdonk, 2013,
pg. 146)
In 1934, in “The influence of Folk-song on the Music of the Church”, RVW argues
that the long-held separation of church music and popular music was a
false:
• his belief was that composers should draw on the local popular music that
surrounded them.
EVIDENCE
“The work is wonderful because it seems to lift one into some unknown region of
musical thought and feeling. Throughout its course one is never quite sure whether
one is listening to something very old or very new ... It cannot be assigned to a time
or a school but it is full of the visions which have haunted the seers of all times.”
(Maitland in Thomson, 2013, p. 65)
As with Bartok, RVW not only made direct folk song arrangements (e.g.
English Folk Song Suite, 1923), but also incorporated the melodic and
harmonic language of them into his ’freely composed’ music
Primarily, in the shaping of melodic material and use of diatonic Church
modes or pentatonic scales
Holst
“Vaughan Williams had begun collecting folksongs in Essex
during 1904 and as soon as Holst heard the tunes he
recognized that this was what he had been longing for.”
“Here, for the first time he found simplicity and economy that he
needed in his own music” page 16 the music of Gustav
Holst- Imogen Holst London Oxford University Press 1968
Edward Elgar
(1857–1934)
“Of course, the two cases are different in many respects, perhaps most notably the
fact that, by 1920, Vaughan Williams was widely known and respected for his work in
other areas (as an editor and folksong collector), something that was not the case
with Elgar. But the suddenness of their rise in esteem is indicative of the fluidity of
British musical life in this period: that a composer whose work reflected the national
zeitgeist in some way could achieve instant and lasting recognition.” (Thomson,
2013, p. 75)
Summary