PART A

Chairperson’s Visit Report

Undergraduate Engineering Program

TIER-II

Name of the Institution

__________________________________
Name of the Program
_______________________
Visit Dates
___________________

NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION

NBCC Place, East Tower, 4th Floor, Bhisham Pitamah Marg, Pragati
Vihar, New Delhi 110003
Tel: +91 112430620-22; 01124360654; www.nbaind.org
Team composition

Name of the Chairperson:______________________________________________________

Designation:_________________________________________________________________

Program 1:

Program evaluator 1 Name

Organization:

Program evaluator 2 Name

Organization:

Program 2:

Program evaluator 1 Name

Organization:

Program evaluator 2 Name

Organization:

Program 3:

Program evaluator 1 Name

Organization:

Program evaluator 2 Name

Organization:

Program 4:

Program evaluator 1 Name

Organization:

Program evaluator 2 Name

Organization:

Program 5:

Program evaluator 1 Name

Organization:

Program evaluator 2 Name

Organization:
Institute Details

Year of Establishment: _________________________

Physical Infrastructure and Ambience: __________________________________

Number of programs being run in the Institute*:

(i) UG- ____________________

(ii) PG - ____________________

Total Number of Students:

(i) In UG programs - _____________

(ii) In PG programs - _____________

Name of programs applied for accreditation

(i) ___________________________
(ii) ___________________________
(iii) ___________________________
(iv) ___________________________
(v) ___________________________

*to be verified from SAR

 Information for Evaluation

Award of Accreditation (TIER II (UG)

1. Full Accreditation for Six years will be accorded to a program on

fulfilment of the following requirements:
i. Program scoring a minimum of 750 points in aggregate out of 1000
points with minimum score of 60% in mandatory fields (criteria 4 to
6)
ii. The number of available Ph.D. in the department is greater than or
equal to 30% of the required number of faculty for previous two
academic years including current academic year.
iii. Admissions in the UG program at the program level are more than or
equal to 75% while at the institute level, the admissions are more
than or equal to 50%, averaged for previous three academic years
including Current Academic Year.
iv. Faculty Student Ratio in the department is less than or equal to 1:15
averaged for the previous three academic years including current
academic year.
v. At least 2 Professors or 1 Professor and 1 Associate Professor (on a
full-time/regular basis) with Ph.D. Degree are available in the
concerned department for previous two academic years including
current academic year.
vi. The HOD of the program under consideration possesses Ph.D.
Degree.
vii. The placement ratio (Placement + higher studies) is greater than or
equal to 40% averaged for the previous three academic years
2. Provisional Accreditation for Three years will be accorded to a
program on fulfilment of the following requirements:

i. The score for the program is greater than or equal to 600 points
with minimum 40% marks in Criterion V (Faculty Information and
Contributions).
ii. At least one Professor or one Associate Professor with Ph.D. degree
(on a full-time/regular basis) is available in the respective
Department for previous two academic years including current
academic year.
iii. The student faculty ratio in the department under consideration is
less than or equal to 1:20 averaged for previous three academic
years including current academic year.
iv. The number of available Ph.D. in the department is greater than or
equal to 10% of the required number of faculty for previous two
academic years including current academic year.
v. The placement ratio (Placement + higher studies) is greater than or
equal to 40% averaged over previous three assessment years.

3. No Accreditation of the program

If the program scores less than 600 marks or less than 40% marks in
Faculty Information and Contributions (Criterion V) or fails to meet the
criteria for award of provisional accreditation for 3 years, the program avail
not be considered for accreditation.
Name of the Program 1:_______________________________________________________

Marks given by Evaluators:

A. Department/Program Specific Criteria:

Max. Marks
S. No. Criteria Remarks
Marks Awarded
1. Vision, Mission and Program 60
Educational Objectives
2. Program Curriculum and 120
Teaching-Learning Processes
3. Course Outcomes and Program 120
Outcomes
4. Students’ Performance 150

5. Faculty Information and 200

Contributions
6. Facilities and Technical Support 80

7. Continuous Improvement 50

TOTAL 780

B. Institute Level Criteria (to be filled by the Chairman) :

Max. Marks
S. No. Criteria Remarks
Marks Awarded
8. First Year Academics 50

9. Student Support Systems 50

10. Governance, Institutional

120
Support and Financial Resources

TOTAL 220

GRAND TOTAL (A +B) 1000

*Assessment for Criteria 8 (8.3, 8.4 &8.5) and 10 (10.3) is different for individual program.

_______________________
Signature
(Chairman)
Name of the Program 2:_______________________________________________________

Marks given by Evaluators:

A. Department/Program Specific Criteria:

Max. Marks
S. No. Criteria Remarks
Marks Awarded
1. Vision, Mission and Program 60
Educational Objectives
2. Program Curriculum and 120
Teaching-Learning Processes
3. Course Outcomes and Program 120
Outcomes
4. Students’ Performance 150

5. Faculty Information and 200

Contributions
6. Facilities and Technical Support 80

7. Continuous Improvement 50

TOTAL 780

B. Institute Level Criteria (to be filled by the Chairman) :

Max. Marks
S. No. Criteria Remarks
Marks Awarded
8. First Year Academics 50

9. Student Support Systems 50

10. Governance, Institutional

120
Support and Financial Resources

TOTAL 220

GRAND TOTAL (A +B) 1000

*Assessment for Criteria 8 (8.3, 8.4 &8.5) and 10 (10.3) is different for individual program.

_______________________
Signature
(Chairman)
Name of the Program 3:_______________________________________________________

Marks given by Evaluators:

A. Department/Program Specific Criteria:

Max. Marks
S. No. Criteria Remarks
Marks Awarded
1. Vision, Mission and Program 60
Educational Objectives
2. Program Curriculum and 120
Teaching-Learning Processes
3. Course Outcomes and Program 120
Outcomes
4. Students’ Performance 150

5. Faculty Information and 200

Contributions
6. Facilities and Technical Support 80

7. Continuous Improvement 50

TOTAL 780

B. Institute Level Criteria (to be filled by the Chairman) :

Max. Marks
S. No. Criteria Remarks
Marks Awarded
8. First Year Academics 50

9. Student Support Systems 50

10. Governance, Institutional

120
Support and Financial Resources

TOTAL 220

GRAND TOTAL (A +B) 1000

*Assessment for Criteria 8 (8.3, 8.4 &8.5) and 10 (10.3) is different for individual program.

_______________________
Signature
(Chairman)
Name of the Program 4:_______________________________________________________

Marks given by Evaluators:

A. Department/Program Specific Criteria:

Max. Marks
S. No. Criteria Remarks
Marks Awarded
1. Vision, Mission and Program 60
Educational Objectives
2. Program Curriculum and 120
Teaching-Learning Processes
3. Course Outcomes and Program 120
Outcomes
4. Students’ Performance 150

5. Faculty Information and 200

Contributions
6. Facilities and Technical Support 80

7. Continuous Improvement 50

TOTAL 780

B. Institute Level Criteria (to be filled by the Chairman) :

Max. Marks
S. No. Criteria Remarks
Marks Awarded
8. First Year Academics 50

9. Student Support Systems 50

10. Governance, Institutional

120
Support and Financial Resources

TOTAL 220

GRAND TOTAL (A +B) 1000

*Assessment for Criteria 8 (8.3, 8.4 &8.5) and 10 (10.3) is different for individual program.

_______________________
Signature
(Chairman)
Name of the Program 5:_______________________________________________________

Marks given by Evaluators:

A. Department/Program Specific Criteria:

Max. Marks
S. No. Criteria Remarks
Marks Awarded
1. Vision, Mission and Program 60
Educational Objectives
2. Program Curriculum and 120
Teaching-Learning Processes
3. Course Outcomes and Program 120
Outcomes
4. Students’ Performance 150

5. Faculty Information and 200

Contributions
6. Facilities and Technical Support 80

7. Continuous Improvement 50

TOTAL 780

B. Institute Level Criteria (to be filled by the Chairman) :

Max. Marks
S. No. Criteria Remarks
Marks Awarded
8. First Year Academics 50

9. Student Support Systems 50

10. Governance, Institutional

120
Support and Financial Resources

TOTAL 220

GRAND TOTAL (A +B) 1000

*Assessment for Criteria 8 (8.3, 8.4 &8.5) and 10 (10.3) is different for individual program.

_______________________
Signature
(Chairman)
Overall Observations
1.

Student-
Name of the Intake Admissions Placement
S. No. Faculty
Program (last year)
Ratio

2. About the progress since last accreditation (to be filled for institutes who have applied for re-
accreditation)

Kindly mention the changes made as recommended by NBA, since the previous visit.

3. Observation on general facilities and about the programs.

Kindly mention general observations about facilities like labs, library etc. and a general review about
the programs.

 1st year
 Academic Ambience
 Student Support Systems
 Strengths, Weaknesses, Concerns, Suggestions

4. Status of imbibing of outcome based accreditation. For Example:

 Formulation of PEOs, PSOs, COs and mappings carried out and implemented
 Methodology for assessing the attainment of outcomes

 Continual improvement process has been set up

 Stakeholders (especially the faculty, HOD, students etc.) awareness about the process