Power Plants 2020+

Power Plant Options for the Future

and the Related Demand for Research
Statement of the
VGB Scientific Advisory Board
2010
 Power Plants 2020+

Contents

1 Introduction 3

2 Generation Structure in the European High-Voltage Grid 4

2.1 Overview 4
2.1.1 Modern Fossil-fired Power Plants 5
2.1.2 Nuclear Power 5
2.1.3 Power Production based on Renewable Energies 6
2.2 Availability and Costs of Different Power Production Options 6
2.3 Costs of the Different Electricity Generation Options 7
2.4. Interaction within the Energy Supply System 9
2.4.1 Overview 9
2.4.2 Research Topics 10
2.5 Conclusion for the Generation Structure until 2020 11

3 Hard Coal/ Lignite Fired Power Plants 12

3.1 Coal Combustion 12
3.1.1 Efficiency Increase and Process Optimisation 12
3.1.2 Plant Optimisation and Increase in Flexibility 13
3.1.3 Carbon Capture and Storage Technology 14
3.1.4 Increase of Acceptance for the Fossil-fired 14
Share of the Generation Portfolio
3.2 Coal Gasification/IGCC Technology 15
3.2.1 Gasification and Gas Cleaning 15
3.2.2 CCS Technology 15
3.2.3 Hydrocarbons- and H2-Production  15
3.2.4 Increase of Acceptance 16
3.3 Material Development and -Optimisation 16

4 Regenerative Power Production Systems 17

4.1 Wind Energy 17
4.1.1 Research Topics 17
4.2 Solar Energy 18
4.2.1 Research Issues 19

1
Power Plants 2020+

5 Nuclear Power 20
5.1 Generation III Reactors (GEN III) 20
5.2 Generation IV Reactors (GEN IV) 20
5.2.1 High-Temperature Reactors for Nuclear Process Heat Production 21
5.2.2 Fast Reactors 21
5.3 Research Demand 21
5.4 Summary and Perspective 23

6 Chemical Storage 24
6.1 Overview 24
6.2 Research Demand 24
6.3 Research Demand for ‘Chemical Storages‘ other than H2 25
6.4 Localisation of ‘Chemical Storages‘ in the European Net 26
and Feed-in of Regenerative Energy

Annex:

Members of the VGB Scientific Advisory Board 28

Members of the Editorial Committee “Power Plants 2020+” 32

2
 Power Plants 2020+

1 Introduction
Based on the investigations of the climate researchers collaborating under the umbrella of
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the members of the VGB Scientific
Advisory Board also share the opinion that electricity generation in Europe has to be switched
to a maximum of low carbon generation technologies.
However, this target cannot be achieved in the short term and also not uniformly in all
European countries due to the availability of resources required in energy conversion proces-
ses, for reasons of national sovereignty and because of necessary quality.
Different European strategies exist according to natural potentials and attitudes towards
nuclear power:
·· Countries like France, the United Kingdom or Sweden consider nuclear power as the most
effective CO2-free resource for electricity generation;
·· Countries like Germany are striving for reduced CO2 emissions through further increasing
the efficiency of fossil-fired power plants and through Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS);
·· Countries like Switzerland and Austria have a significant share of hydro power which
might possibly be even extended;
·· Countries with suitable coastal regions like e.g. Denmark, the Netherlands, Great Britain
and Germany support and boost wind power;
·· Countries in South Europe like e.g. Italy, Spain and Portugal dispose of solar energy that
can be exploited.
This short overview already demonstrates that in the foreseeable future all generation options
– nuclear power, fossil-fired power plants and renewable sources of energy – will continue to
be applied. If, however, due to climate protection targets, energy conversion processes are to
be to switched to CO2-free or -low carbon energy sources, comprehensive research ende-
avours will be required in order to advance existing technology options and to adjust them to
changing conditions.

This paper is bound to recommend individual fields of research from the viewpoint of the
VGB Scientific Advisory Board for the period 2020 and beyond.
Firstly, the generation structure in the European high-voltage grid and its development until
2020 will be considered, then the research demand for
·· Hard coal- and lignite-fired power plants,
·· Renewables-based electricity generation (wind, solar energy) and
·· Nuclear-based electricity generation
will be outlined briefly, listing the main technology issues to be answered by researchers in
order to increase efficiency and to settle any “loose ends”. Apart from generation technolo-
gies, the options for storing electrical energy will also be dealt with. These options can con-
tribute to make the feed-in of renewables-based electricity more permanent and
sustainable.

3
Power Plants 2020+

2 Generation Structure in the European High-Voltage Grid

2.1 Overview
The global financial and economic crisis that started in September 2008 also affected – alt-
hough cushioned – the European energy sector. The consequences are manifold and can be
characterised as follows:
·· Industrial enterprises throttled production and required clearly less electricity and heat,
·· Electricity consumption decreased over the complete year of 2009, in Germany alone
by 6 %, 58 mm > 79 mm > 121 mm > 184 mm >

·· A lot of power plant projects had to be delayed due to financial problems, among them
also large projects on the basis of renewable sources of energy.

Thus, compared to the growth rates assumed prior to the crisis, the increase in electricity
generation until 2020 should be obviously smaller. It has to be supposed that the gross elec-
tricity generation in the European high-voltage system that amounted to about 3,300 TWh in
2005 (Germany 585 TWh) will only increase to approximately 3,700 TWh in 2020 instead of
4,000 TWh as estimated before the crisis. The question arises whether and how the existing
power plant park can be restructured by 2020 in order to cover the demand by meeting at the
same time climate protection targets of minus 20 % greenhouse gases (EU) and minus 21 %
CO2 (Germany) with reference to the 1990 values.

These figures reveal that all available sources of energy will have to make their individual
contribution in order to meet demand and the politically agreed climate protection targets.

Plus 12 % in 15 years (0.9 % per year) Additional demand:

9 400 × 109 kWh/a
3,700 × 10 kWh
Replacement:
3,300 × 109 kWh 800 × 109 kWh/a

56 %
46 % Nuclear
CO2-free
and
CO2-free Renewables
Additional demand
renewables:
295,000 MW

54 % Fossil fired 44 % Additional demand

power plants nuclear:
11,000 MW

2005 2020

Figure 1: Expected extension of power plants and its coverage for EU-27 (Source: VGB).

4
 Power Plants 2020+

Even if it would be managed to meet the increase in electricity generation through very am-
bitious increases in renewable sources of energy, and even if above that the share of CO2-free
nuclear power was kept constant by constructing new plants, this would not save a single
tonne of CO2.

Therefore, the entire share of CO2-reduction in electricity generation would have to be reali-
sed by fossil-fired power plants. This, however, could only be materialised by 2020 through a
consequent and comprehensive power plant renewal programme, i.e. old plants with low ef-
ficiencies will have to be replaced by highly efficient plants with cutting-edge technology.

Besides, central generation facilities will have to be advanced and further developed in order
to enable them to cope with the increased feed-in of renewables-based electricity into elec-
trical grids. They will have to compensate for the fluctuating and difficult to forecast diffe-
rence between privileged feed-in-capacity and current demand, unless suitable storage opti-
ons may become available that could store surplus renewables-based power. The existing
pump-storage capacity is far from being sufficient, and the potential for new dams is in cen-
tral Europe practically exploited. Therefore, conventional and nuclear power plants will have
to operate more in load-following modes (including capability for steep load ramps, see chap-
ter 2.4.1).

2.1.1 Modern Fossil-fired Power Plants

The focus will have to be on the construction of new plants with much higher efficiencies.
However, this will not be sufficient to meet long-term climate protection targets, i.e. further
steps will be required like e.g. CCS technology which will probably be available after 2020.
CCS can also be retrofitted to existing power plants.

In order to meet demand and to be able to guarantee supply security at any time, about
170,000 MW will have to be built anew in Europe by 2020. This figure corresponds to about
200 large hard coal-, lignite- and gas-fired power plants (source: VGB PowerTech 12/2009).

In the past three years, real new construction only amounted to slightly more than 50 % of
the calculated demand. Every cancellation or delay of any project, either in the field of rene-
wables, nuclear power or fossil-fired plants, jeopardises climate protection targets. The same
applies if electricity consumption will increase more until 2020.

2.1.2 Nuclear Power

CO2-free nuclear power remains indispensable in this energy mix. The further development
and advancement of nuclear power forms the basis for a clean and secure future energy sup-
ply in numerous European countries. Apart from Finland, France, Slovakia, Romania and
Russia (e.g. at Kaliningrad) where nuclear power plants are already under construction, the
United Kingdom, Italy, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, the Czech Republic,
Lithuania, Slovenia, Bulgaria and Hungary have also launched or announced new nuclear
construction programmes. The only countries which remain with phase-out decisions
Germany, Belgium and Spain are striving for a prolongation of operating periods of nuclear
power plants.

5
Power Plants 2020+

Therefore, it can be assumed that due to the technically possible lifetime of nuclear plants,
amounting to at least 50 to 60 years, in the coming decade only very few nuclear units will
be decommissioned for technical reasons (namely in the UK), while new plants will only be
commissioned after 2020 due to long planning and construction periods. A total of about
11,000 MW of new nuclear capacity have yet been announced in Europe to be completed by
2020 (capacity increases are not considered for reasons of simplicity).

E.g. in Germany nuclear power plants save every year about 150 million tonnes of CO2. This
figure equals to the amount of CO2 emissions emitted annually by the entire German road
traffic. This contribution to climate protection is for free and also increases security of supply.

2.1.3 Power Production Based on Renewable Energies

The EU targeted a share of renewables in final energy consumption of 20  % by 2020.
According to current calculations, the major share of this extreme rapid development would
have to be covered by wind energy. The portion of this source of energy will have to increase
by a factor of eight between 2005 and 2020, requiring annual new construction of more than
5,000 on- and off-shore wind power plants.

A verification of this scenario jointly carried out with manufacturers of wind power plants
turned out that about 40,000 MW of existing wind power plants will be decommissioned in
Europe by 2020 due to aging. This is much more than e.g. the wind capacity currently instal-
led in Germany.

Together with other renewable sources of energy like hydro power, biomass, biogas, solar
thermal power plants, photovoltaics, geothermal energy and ocean energy, the total additio-
nal power plant capacities required would amount to 295,000 MW in order to meet the
European-wide targets.

This is an enormous challenge for manufacturers and operators. A look into the past makes it
obvious: Annual new constructions would have to be increased by another third compared to
capacity increases that have been realised since 2005, i.e. until 2020 about 800 billion Euros
would have to be financed Europe-wide. The figure corresponds e.g. to one third of the
German gross domestic product in 2009 (GDP).

2.2 Availability and Costs of Different Power Production Options

The high number of new renewables-based capacities to achieve the required portion of elec-
tricity generation mainly results from the comparatively poor number of annual full load
hours of wind power and photovoltaic plants. Due to natural conditions, wind and photovol-
taic plants only produce power e.g. in Germany during approximately 20 and 10 % of all an-
nual hours (8,760 h), respectively (source: BDEW 2009). Nuclear power plants, lignite-and
hard coal-fired units accomplish much higher annual full load hours.

However, secure supply necessitates sufficient power plant capacity at any time. While “trus-
ted”, i.e. planable electricity provided by nuclear, lignite-fired and hard coal-fired, but also
gas-fired power plants amounts to more than 80 % of their respective nominal capacity, the
“trusted” share of wind power even within the European interconnected grid only amounts to

6
 Power Plants 2020+

Annual full load hours of German power plants 2008

Nuclear 7 690

Lignite 6 710

Hard coal 4 320

Hydro 3 960

Natural gas 3 430

Wind 1 740

Oil 1 540

Pump storage 1 030 Availability

1999 to 2008
Photovoltaics 920

Source: BDEW

Figure 2: Generation utilisation and energy availability of power plants at full load hours.

6 % (source: Deutsche Energieagentur 2005, www.DENA.de/dena-netzstudie). That means

that for every MW of installed wind power 0.94 MW of conventional power plant capacity is
needed as reserve to take over electricity production if wind does not blow.

2.3 Costs of the Different Electricity Generation Options

The organisation of the future energy mix must not only to be considered under the aspects
of climate protection and security of supply, but also from the viewpoint of costs. Restructuring
of the energy supply system has to be as cost-effective as possible in order not to unnecessa-
rily endanger the competitiveness of European industrial sites.

Electricity generation costs that are based on different primary energy sources have been
assessed in different studies; the OECD Study “Projected Costs of Electricity 2010” has com-
piled a broad database from these sources (www.iea.org/publications).

The study, updated regularly, contains the costs from OECD countries for the power produc-
tion options available in individual countries. Coal options also comprise CO2 separation cost.
The study shows that
·· The cost level in Asia is clearly lower,
·· Nuclear energy is the most cost favourable energy conversion process in all regions,
·· On-shore wind can be competitive only under favourable conditions (America), and lies
otherwise clearly above competitiveness (Europe, Asia),
·· Coal and gas (without CCS) can be competitive,

7
Power Plants 2020+

·· including CCS results in an considerable increase in cost (up to 100 %), thus putting coal
and gas on a comparable cost level like on-shore wind power,
·· The cost for off-shore-wind power plants are even higher (200 %) compared to the other
generation options due to additional expenditures for foundations and grid connection.

The integration of CCS will make coal- and gas-based generation processes extremely expen-
sive. Learning curve effects in connection with more stringent emission regimes for non-CCS-
plants lead to the expectation that this technology could under these boundary conditions
achieve market maturity in the next decade.

Whether additional cost for renewable sources of energy or CCS can be borne by the national
economies will depend on the political decision making in individual states. Cost reduction
potentials will have to be identified through research projects.

250
Median Line
200

150
US$/MWh

100

50

0
Nuclear Coal Coal Gas Wind Nuclear Coal Coal Gas Wind Nuclear Coal Coal Gas Wind
w/CC(S) Onshore w/CC(S) Onshore w/CC(S) Onshore

North America Europe Asia Pacific

CAN, MEX, USA, US EPRI AUT, BEL, CHE, CZE, DEU, Eurelectric/VGB, ESAA, JPN, KOR
FRA, HUN, ITA, NLD, SVK, SWE

Figure 3: Full cost of electricity generation (including cost for CO2 separation of 30 $/t CO2
without transport and storage) of different electricity generation technologies for dif-
ferent countries at an interest rate of 5  % (Source: OECD-International Energy
Agency).

8
 Power Plants 2020+

2.4. Interaction within the Energy Supply System

2.4.1 Overview
In the conception of research topics after 2020 it is assumed that wind- and solar-based
power, which will increase according to current forecasts, will lead to “natural”, but not yet
solved requirements in connection with the controlling of the European high-voltage system:
Grid operators must be enabled to compensate for the increasing share of fluctuating, sto-
chastic energy. A large number of small, decentralised feed-in newcomers, consumers and
storages will have to be integrated into the grid, preferably by applying common information
technology, sometimes delineated as “virtual power plants”.

Seasonal, weekly, daily- and weather-related fluctuations of grid feed-in are quite remarka-
ble according to scientific analysis. Therefore, further possibilities aiming at the compensation
of grid fluctuations have to be urgently identified in addition to pump-storage plants and
emerging “smart grids”. A statement of VDE1 characterises the situation as follows:

“Long-term storage with less than one cycle per week for compensating general weather
conditions and seasonal fluctuations is hardly economically justified according to current
criteria. However, long-term storages are the only means bearing the potential to sustainably
replace thermal power plants yet needed for keeping reserves. Hydrogen storages or the con-
version of today’s large barrier lakes into pumped-storage plants are the more cost-efficient
technology options.” 2

Hence follows that completely new storage possibilities will have to be found in the long
term on the basis of chemicals (cf. section 6). As long as such or other storage options are not
yet available, existing coal- and nuclear-based electricity generation options would have in-
creasingly to adjust to operation in the medium and peak load modes, because Europe-wide
renewables-based electricity enjoys feed-in priority into the grid. The operation mode of con-
ventional energy sources will be adjusted through:
·· Further development and retrofit of available coal-based technologies (i.e. taking proven
process technology as basis for corresponding replacements) for medium and peak load
operation,
·· Nuclear plants that can also be operated in the medium load range on demand.

The ’simple’ conception to shut down e.g. coal-fired power plants if wind power is supplied
excessively, as it is possible with gas-fired power plants, is restricted due to the following
drawbacks and side conditions:
·· It is not possible to shut down fossil-fired cogeneration power plants that are not only
supplying power into electricity grid but which are simultaneously providing heat. The
operation mode of using combined heat and power plants just to cover local heat de-
mands can only be considered an emergency measure,
1 VDE / ETG – Task Force Energiespeicher: „Energiespeicher in Stromversorgungssystemen mit hohem Anteil erneuerbarer
Energieträger“, Juni 2009; Herausgeber: VDE, Stresemannallee 15, 60595 Frankfurt
2 The potential of compressed air storages and battery systems as long-term storage for renewable sources of energy
seems to be limited. Against this background, they are not considered in the following. However, it goes without saying
that research is also required in these fields.

9
Power Plants 2020+

High Flexibilty of Conventional Power Plants:

Gas, Nuclear, Hard coal and Lignite

Sprint Lurk Glide, Hover, Ascend

Gas New Hard coal Nuclear (Biblis),

New Lignite (Neurath)
100% 100% 100%
80% 80% 80%
Biblis
Capacity

Capacity

Capacity
60% 60% 60%
40% 40% 40% Neurath
20% 20% 20%
0% 0% 0%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Min. Min. Min.

Fast start-up, but very expensive Part load operation from 25 % possible. Intended for base load. Can be operated eco-
in part-load operation. Economic also in low demand periods. nomically also in times of low load or
high feed-in from renewables.

Figure 4: Load following operation of large power plants.

·· Start-up and/or shutdown periods,

·· Minimum load requirements.

The weak points outlined above can already be noticed, although the bulk of wind power is
still supplied by on-shore wind farms. The difficulties will even multiply if the anticipated
additional wind power (40,000 MW in Europe and 10,000 MW in Germany) will be added by
2020.

Accordingly nuclear power plants display the technically most favourable load follow opera-
tion. However, due to their high fix-cost structure they are not primarily used to control the
grid for economic reasons.

2.4.2 Research Topics

In this situation the following research topics were identified:
·· As quickly as possible improvement of grid control capabilities of coal-fired power plants
up to peak load operation in order to be able to integrate wind power;
·· Extension of operation regimes down to low minimum loads, minimization of startup and
shutdown costs for all plants participating in load following operation;
·· Development of large power storage technologies on either physical or chemical basis for
integration into the existing generation and grid structure;

10
 Power Plants 2020+

·· Reliable IT connections between all modules of renewables-based generation for purposes

of control, monitoring, visualisation and data storage, based on remote data transmission;
·· Improvement of electrical cable technologies especially for off-shore wind energy plants
to the coast, especially in terms of losses, reliability, cost and environmental compatibility;
·· Extension of the high-voltage grid which mainly involves capacity improvements of cross-
border transfer points along national borders.

2.5 Conclusion for the Generation Structure until 2020

Even if
·· electricity consumption will increase less than originally forecasted before the financial
and economic crisis,
·· renewable sources of energy will be extended as described,
·· nuclear-based generation will slightly increase,
·· all possibilities will be exploited to acquire CO2 certificates outside the EU (Joint
Implementation/ Clean Development Mechanisms),

the EU CO2 reduction target of minus 20 % by 2020 will not be achieved if the major share of
CO2 reduction is not being performed by fossil-fired power plants. And this, however, can only
be accomplished if power plant renewal programmes are being implemented with high in-
vestments in latest coal and gas projects.

In summary that means:

·· The annual extension of renewables would have to be increased by at least one third. Grid
and storage capacities would have to be enlarged in parallel.
·· Planned nuclear projects must be realised in due time, existing capacities must continue
operation and should increase their individual capacities.
·· Nearly all new fossil-fired (gas and coal) projects that have been announced concretely
have to be realised by 2020.

In Europe about 475,000 MW of new generation capacity will have to be installed by 2020.
The entire cost will easily go beyond the billion (1012) Euro range.

11
Power Plants 2020+

3 Hard Coal/Lignite Fired Power Plants

In the field of central coal-based electricity generation, two technology lines are of decisive
importance:
·· Coal combustion and
·· Coal gasification.

Combustion is the coal technology that can be described as state of the art and which has to
be further developed from this position. Although coal gasification is applied worldwide in
chemical plants, this technology cannot be labelled as being proven for power plant applica-
tion. The main advantage of gasification is the simultaneous utilisation of coal being conver-
ted into gaseous and liquid fuels and into chemical base substances.

3.1 Coal Combustion

In the field of coal combustion, the development strategies launched for the decade 2011 to
2020 will have to be supplemented by additional requirements of climate protection. Hence
efficiency increases will have to remain in the focus of attention because enlarged plant ef-
ficiency will also result in improved economic efficiency and will save coal reserves at the
same time. This is the basis to introduce CCS technology, because only high thermal conver-
sion efficiency can lead to acceptable total net efficiencies that can compensate the high,
inevitable efficiency losses caused by CO2 separation procedures.

Issues like
·· Efficiency increase and process optimisation,
·· Optimisation of operation and increased flexibility,
·· Introduction of CCS technology and
·· Improved acceptance for the fossil share of the generation portfolio

have already been addressed by researchers and will have to be continued in the period up to
2020. In this context the following individual objectives will have to be pursued.

3.1.1 Efficiency Increase and Process Optimisation

Efficiencies of pulverised fuel-fired power plants, either hard coal or lignite, can only be furt-
her improved if on the one hand the live steam parameters are augmented and on the other
hand individual components of the whole plant are systematically optimised.

Higher process parameters (mainly the increase of live steam temperatures from 600/620 to
700/ 720 °C) require development and application of nickel base alloys. A lot of important
R&D projects are already under way in this field (COMTES700, 725 HWT GKM, etc.). However,
development is still needed in order to test such new high-temperature materials for their
long-term suitability and to qualify their manufacturing (shaping and welding). It is expected
that this increase in live steam temperature will enhance electrical power plant net efficiency

12
 Power Plants 2020+

from currently 46 % to more than 50 % by 2020. Key developments could be new base alloys,
composite materials and/or coating technologies.

Exploitation of these improvement potentials will have to start with the redesign of each
component of the entire water/ steam cycle. This applies to the mechanical layout of compo-
nents (e.g. the optimisation of gas and steam turbine blades) as well as to the minimisation
of auxiliary power demand (e.g. speed-variable electrical drives).

Other individual measures are to be mentioned as examples for research topics:

·· Further development of waste heat recovery systems (arrangement and materials),
·· Improvement of measuring accuracy (maximising recapture from measurement
uncertainties),
·· Further optimisation of lignite pre-drying and integration into the power plant process
and
·· Broadening the application range of lower-cost materials for boilers and turbines.

The introduction of superconductors in electrical equipment can further increase conversion

efficiency and above all it highly reduces specific material expenditure (copper).
The following economic advantages are expected from the introduction of superconductors
for generators, electrical motors, cables and transformers: Material savings of more than
50 %, resulting in smaller dimensions and weights also for cranes, foundations, buildings,
plant efficiency increase of 0.5 to 1.0 % points, corresponding to a capitalised efficiency gain
of 50 to 100 % of the generator cost. Comparable electricity production costs and higher
generator voltages should be possible in the long term.

Technical advantages are the increase in the maximum generator capacity from some 2000 to
about 3,000 MVA, higher stability, smaller reactances, more idle power in unexcited operati-
on, higher overload, higher asymmetric load tolerance, and the options to avoid hydrogen
cooling especially in the case of generators and to avoid oil cooling for more transformers,
thus minimising fire loads.

3.1.2 Plant Optimisation and Increase in Flexibility

Plant operations can be further optimised and plant dynamics, namely load following behavi-
our and plant availability can be improved. Plant lifetime can be prolonged through extended
application of digital control technology and more online condition monitoring.

Apart from pressure and temperature as important design parameters, lifetime of high-tem-
perature components in coal- and gas-fired power plants is highly determined by the gra-
dients according to which a plant is being started up and shut down or has to adjust its
output. These design parameters will have to be much better harmonised in order to achieve
optimum results especially with a view to the increasing demand to follow fluctuating load
requirements (e.g. feed-in of wind power). Monitoring measurements (e.g. future precision
measurement of temperatures above 700 °C to +/-1 °C using fixpoint thermocouples) are an
important precondition to forecast power plant lifetime.

13
Power Plants 2020+

Integration of lifetime calculations into control technology (“ageing management”) also calls
for exact knowledge about characteristics of materials and their dependency on operating
conditions. In parallel, operation simulation software tools should be developed further in
order to optimise operation. Improvement of boiler cleaning devices is also an important issue
for plant availability.

Investigations into minimisation of efficiency losses in part load operation and reduction of
minimum loads are additional possible fields of research.

3.1.3 Carbon Capture and Storage Technology

If fossil primary sources of energy will continue to keep their large share in electricity gene-
ration, then it will be inevitable to apply CCS (carbon capture and storage) technology. Since
currently no clear advantage can be identified for none of the three options (pre-combustion,
oxy-combustion, post-combustion), all three technologies should be developed. The drop of
total plant efficiency associated to the application of CCS is the pivotal point for research and
development both under ecological as well as economical aspects. This drawback must be
minimised.

Concrete R&D is required to further advance the oxy-combustion process and the air separa-
tion process itself. The oxy-combustion process requires optimisation of materials applied in
the entire flue gas path and investigation of the accumulation of harmful substances along
the flue gas path. Concerning post-combustion CCS processes, the application of scrubbing
agents (degradation, energy demand for regeneration etc.), the separation process itself (heat
transfer) and the integration into the power plant (provision of steam, integration of waste
heat, etc.) have to be enhanced.

Supplementary process alternatives of the so-called second generation, aiming at the utilisa-
tion of separated CO2 (e.g. “carbonate-looping” or “chemical-looping”) should also be inves-
tigated in parallel. These developments will also be covered by current programmes, however,
they cannot be considered as completed. Therefore, research has to be intensified in this field.
However, it can be ascertained that the CO2 market will remain tiny in comparison to the
amount of CO2 emissions released by power plants.

Transport and storage of separated CO2 can be technically realised and has been applied e.g.
in the USA and Canada for a number of years in the oil production industry (“enhanced oil
recovery”). CO2 has also been stored and monitored for some 15 years in other projects like
e.g. in the Sleipner oil field in the North Sea.

Further research is needed to investigate CO2 storage in saline aquifers and the acceptance of
such storage options.

3.1.4 Increase of Acceptance for the Fossil-fired Share of the Generation Portfolio
New fossil fired power plant constructions are more and more under pressure due to public
acceptance problems. These problems will even increase when introducing CCS technology.
Consequently a major portion of research should be devoted to technical variants as well as
improvement of environmental protection and safety. Partial aspects could be the reduction

14
 Power Plants 2020+

of building height (to improve appearance) and an intensified employment of monitoring

systems. Another important aspect is the safety case of CO2 transport and storage. Definition
and explanation of “capture readiness” for new construction is also an important partial
aspect.

3.2 Coal Gasification/IGCC Technology

Supplementing coal combustion, coal gasification can also be used to generate electricity
(Integrated Coal Combined Cycle, IGCC). In future, however, generation of gaseous and liquid
fuels as well as the production of base chemicals could play an important role (in centralised
gasification plants) in order to improve supply security.

3.2.1 Gasification and Gas Cleaning

For both the above-mentioned applications, the “gas island” is vital (gasifier, quench/ partial
quench, waste heat recovery and gas scrubbing), requiring further and more intensive R&D in
order to reach economic parity. Depending on the individual application of the generated gas,
its composition (H2, CO, CO2 and/ or CH4) has to be optimised. Development of materials is
also important in this field (metallic and ceramic materials under chemically reducing condi-
tions) and also further development of gas scrubbing processes (sulphur components etc.)

Co-gasification of biomass has to be further supported to improve the CO2 balance.

3.2.2 CCS Technology

Classical gasification with subsequent CO-shift reaction leads to high CO2 and H2 compo-
nents in the gas, with the hydrogen being able to be utilized for electricity production in
Integrated Coal Gasification Combined Cycle-(IGCC) power plants. This would require deve-
lopment of a gas turbine for hydrogen combustion. However, special attention would have to
be paid to NOX abatement.

3.2.3 Hydrocarbons- and H2-Production 

Improvement is also needed in this field, because with classical thermal and physical ­methods,
air separation consumes a lot of energy. This problem can partly be solved if the required O2
would be provided by electrolysis. While the oxygen would be used in the gasification proce-
dure the valuable hydrogen could be used as intermediate energy storage, for the production
of synthetic fuels or for direct energetic utilisation (fuel cell, H2-gas turbine etc). Energetic
utilisation could take place at the gasification site or decentralised when fed into gas grids.

Hydrocarbons can also be generated from coal/ biomass gasification. The resulting synthetic
gas can also either be used to produce a gas similar to natural gas which could then be fed
into the gas grid, or to produce e.g. liquid fuels via Fischer-Tropsch-Synthesis.

15
Power Plants 2020+

3.2.4 Increase of Acceptance

As with combustion technology, the public acceptance of coal gasification needs to be impro-
ved. The generation of synthetic fuels and chemical base substances could promote argu-
ments in favour of gasification because of their supply safety aspect. The large variety of in-
put substances ranging from refinery residues over all coal grades up to biomass is another
particular advantage. Fluctuating power load requirements could be met by adjusting electri-
city and/or fuel generation according to demand.

3.3 Material Development and -Optimisation

Optimisation and further development of coal combustion and gasification technologies re-
quire development and testing of materials to be used in different application ranges. This
applies to cost-efficient materials for state-of-the-art technologies and high-temperature
materials for 700 °C and beyond. Special endeavours are required to stabilise micro structure
and material phases to guarantee high material strengths over long-term operations. Besides,
corrosion-resistant materials are to be developed to be applied in the CCS process chain.

Manufacturing and process technology as well as material behaviour under multi-axial ten-
sion loads and its calculation tools are also important R&D aspects here.

These activities should be harmonized with the R&D policy of Fachverband Dampfkessel-,
Behälter- und Rohrleitungsbau (FDBR, Association of Steam Boiler, Pressure Vessel and Piping
Manufacturers).

16
 Power Plants 2020+

4 Regenerative Power Production Systems

4.1 Wind Energy

Wind utilisation must be extended in order to meet the requirements of the European Union
within the scope of its energy and climate package until 2020. By the end of 2009 a total of
21,164 wind power plants with an output of 25,777 MW were in operation in Germany alone.
At that time, the installed capacity in Europe amounted to 74,767 MW and worldwide to
157,899 MW.

The capacity of future off-shore wind farms will be better than current on-shore units, which
on average have a utilisation of 20%. These off-shore parks will be erected in distances of up
to 100 km off the coast. The plants (all structures and systems) require light-weight construc-
tions for logistical reasons and component strength. Experience yet made is based on medium
class machine sizes (2 to 3 MW) that were erected on-shore or in regions close to the coast
in shallow waters. Plants of the 5 to 6 MW range with tower heights of more than 100 m and
rotor diameters of more than 120 metres are now becoming state of the art.

These plants and especially future generations of wind power plants after 2020 will need
optimised structures and systems.

4.1.1 Research Topics

Main Structure, Rotors and Drive Train

Wind power plants see extreme dynamic stress with high load cycle numbers. Therefore light-
weight constructions and corresponding materials and/or material systems with low specific
weight, high strength and durability against environmental influences (corrosion, erosion)
and high damage tolerance are needed. Consequent advancement of plant technology is thus
of utmost importance to enhance technical availability. Apart from reliability, economic con-
siderations also take into account parameters like weight, cost and efficiency. Especially off-
shore wind power plants need innovative and low-cost foundations and erection concepts.
Optimisation has to involve design, foundation, on-shore pre-fabrication, transport and in-
stallation. Effective and safe solutions will have to be developed.

Rotor Blades
Capacity increases require longer rotor blades and a related increase in tower height. High
load cycle numbers also enlarge the tendency to fatigue of composite materials and they are
also decisive for plant lifetime. Research activities are needed aiming at optimised rotor bla-
des, more corrosion-resistant surface coatings as well as for the automation of manufactu-
ring processes.

The development of high-resolution and automated systems for the monitoring of rotor blade
surfaces has to be accelerated. In the field of aerodynamics and aero acoustics research is
required aiming at increasing efficiency and reduction of noise emissions. Measurements of
turbulence fields near the rotor surfaces are needed to determine the real stress of rotors.

17
Power Plants 2020+

Drive Train
The increase of output yields an increased torque in the drive train. Correspondingly, drive
train, gear and generator are to be advanced. Currently two concepts are being employed:
Gear or direct drive. In the field of e.g. gears the number of gear stages has to be reduced. The
maintenance effort will have to be decreased in general to improve availability and reliability.
This can be achieved through improved design principles, corresponding materials and adjus-
ted manufacturing process as well as less component weights.

Condition Monitoring Systems

Highly efficient condition monitoring systems are needed to detect damages in due time and
to restrict damages to limited areas through corresponding measures, thus preventing propa-
gation of damages to other components. These systems support early detection of relevant
changes to plant condition (especially for off-shore plants) in order to be able to plan main-
tenance or replacement measures in due time.

4.2 Solar Energy

Utilisation of solar energy for electricity generation cannot yet be compared with the deve-
lopment stage of wind power. However, it has a similarly high technical potential. Solar-based
electricity generation is differentiated between photovoltaics (PV) and solar thermal electri-
city (STE), often called concentrating solar power (CSP). Worldwide, at the beginning of 2010
around 20 GW of PV and approximately 1 GW of STE were installed.

One extraordinary feature of PV is its decentralised nature with small unit capacities. PV can
also convert direct as well as indirect radiation in contrast to STE, which can only utilise di-
rect sunlight. Although PV can theoretically be used in all climatic zones, both technologies
mainly make sense in the vicinity of the Earth’s desert belt, where sunlight radiation density
is higher.

Data on electricity generation costs vary according to technology and source. Currently the
installed capacity of STE is lower, however, in terms of electricity generation costs an advan-
tage of 0 to 50 % in comparison to PV can be quoted. STE-based electricity can have a higher
value if it is fed into the grid more according to load demands in co-operation with inter-
mediate thermal storages.

At the beginning of 2010 the capacity of the worldwide STE projects was said to amount to
approximately 20 GW. From a European viewpoint it seems to be possible that in the medium
term a similarly high amount of STE energy from the Mediterranean and North Africa could
be fed into the European power grid as from the wind plants along the Atlantic and Baltic
coasts. This approach has been formalised in the so-called “Desertec” project, under which
STE plants (among others) are supposed to generate electricity in North Africa, and which
might then be transported via high-voltage Direct Current lines to Europe.

It is expected that photovoltaics will grow annually by 10 GW in the period 2010 to 2015.

18
 Power Plants 2020+

4.2.1 Research Issues

The research demand of PV and STE is very different. Although cost reduction and increase in
efficiency are the prime objectives in both technologies, STE is still in a much earlier stage of
its learning curve than e.g. wind power or PV. Consequentially STE needs much more research
and development.

Photovoltaics
In the case of PV current research endeavours and progress mainly refer more to production
technologies and assembly logistics than to the actual electricity generation technology (mi-
cro power plant engineering).

Line Focusing STE Systems

A high fraction of the costs of STE systems are investment costs. More cost-effective concen-
tration technologies are thus the key to the reduction of overall system costs. It is expected
that new approaches (e.g. parabolic trough system, Fresnel reflector systems, pneumatically
formed mirror foils) will clearly improve this technology.

Apart from the concentrators, the absorber tubes play a key role. If oil is to be abandoned as
heat carrier and if new systems with direct evaporating systems and thus higher conversion
rates in the evaporation process should be employed, absorbers will have to be developed
with less thermal losses for higher surface temperatures.

Thermal storage systems are among the most important advantages of STE in comparison to
PV and wind. The current thermal oil technology uses liquid storage systems. If, however,
higher process efficiencies are to be realised through direct evaporation, new storage techno-
logies have to be developed in parallel, mainly latent heat storage.

Point Focusing STE Systems

Due to their potentially higher energy density, point focusing STE systems have a theoretically
higher efficiency potential than line focusing systems. However, due to technical difficulties
and also higher cost, this technology has commercially fallen behind parabolic trough sys-
tems. The potential of the so-called solar tower concept is very high and this approach should
not be neglected.

On the one hand receiver technology (e.g. ceramic absorbers, pressurised air absorbers, “beam
down concepts”) and related system technology have to be developed. The theoretically high
efficiency potential of the solar tower concept can only be realised in connection with gas
turbine technology. Costs mainly have to be reduced through standardisation, effective cont-
rol and optimised sizes of the so-called heliostats.

Finally it has to be mentioned that point focusing systems are the key to generate hydrogen
on the basis of solar energy. Solar chemical processes for direct generation of hydrogen are
much more promising in terms of efficiency than two-stage generation via solar power and
high-temperature electrolysis.

19
Power Plants 2020+

5 Nuclear Power
Any holistic assessment of the environmental compatibility of nuclear power has to take into
account – apart from the lacking of climate-relevant greenhouse gases during operation –
also emissions and residues caused by nuclear plant construction itself.

Experience shows that radioactive emissions occurring under normal plant operation are neg-
ligible, i.e. these emissions are far less than the variation of natural radiation background.
Radioactive exposure of plant personnel can also be considered as unproblematic due to in-
tensive research and exposure monitoring. Radioactive residues from power plant operation
can also be conditioned emission-free and can be stored safely in special interim structures.

Principally spent nuclear fuel or waste can be stored for good in geological formations. Since
the time constants of geological stability e.g. of rock salt are by orders of magnitude higher
than the radioactive half-life period of all sufficiently active nuclides of radioactive waste, it
can be reasonably excluded that the biosphere will ever be jeopardised at any time. After
some 10,000 years, the radioactivity of final storage products will have decreased to the level
of natural uranium deposits, whereas e.g. rock salt formations remain stable over hundreds of
millions of years.

Concepts are also being pursued which enable on the one hand partitioning, P, and on the
other hand transmutation, T, i.e. conversion in the reactor by catching neutrons, thus trans-
forming the “minor actinides” with long radioactive half-life periods into lighter isotopes
with short radioactive half-life periods (but then higher activities). P&T technology will still
require considerable research including experiments in view of the reprocessing procedure
that will have to be adjusted, also in view of fuel element development as well as core
design.

5.1 Generation III Reactors (GEN III)

The current advancement of nuclear reactors comprises the following development lines:
·· Evolutionary advanced light water reactors (e.g. EPR, MIR-1200, ABWR),
·· Revolutionary light water reactors with increased passive safety characteristics
(AP-1000, KERENA),
·· Modular (small) nuclear reactors with even more inherent safety characteristics.

5.2 Generation IV Reactors (GEN IV)

Provided that nuclear power will keep its central position to cover in future the worldwide
highly increasing demand in primary energy, it seems to be necessary to realise innovative
nuclear energy technology. These reactors might increasingly incorporate principles of natural
law (like gravity) for their safety functions that will reliably work in case of accidents without
additional external energy.

20
 Power Plants 2020+

5.2.1 High-temperature Reactors for Nuclear Process Heat Production

High-temperature reactor HTR technology is an important module in the long term for envi-
ronmentally competitive and resource saving electricity generation and energy conversion.
The fact that HTRs are the only CO2-free high-temperature source for industrial applications
is of particular interest. Apart from electricity generation it could also be used in numerous
chemical processes, e.g. for generating hydrogen through hot steam electrolysis or for syn-
thesis-, fuel gas- and fuel (methanol) production based on coal. This would lead to a reduc-
tion of CO2 emissions of at least 40 % with reference to the entire fuel cycle and to currently
employed coal upgrading processes.

In addition, HTRs are - due to their inherent safety properties - also suited as a heat source
for decentral heating and even district heating systems in the low temperature range.
Prototypes have only recently been completed in Japan and China. Especially in Japan, hydro-
gen will soon be produced on a prototype scale with nuclear process heat in the HTTR 30 test
facility. In the USA, the HTR is the core of the “Next Generation Nuclear Plant” (NGNP) pro-
ject, supported by the US Department of Energy. This project is also aiming at hydrogen
generation.

High-temperature reactors are already part of the GENERATION-IV programme that is also
being supported by the European Union in view of future sustainable utilisation of nuclear
power.

5.2.2 Fast Reactors

In the period after 2020 fast reactors should also be available. It remains to be seen how the
economic efficiency of these nuclear reactors will develop in comparison to light water- and
heavy water reactors, who have an economic advantage as long as uranium (and thorium,
which is four times more abundant in the Earth’s crust than uranium) prices remain low.

Breeder reactors open up the full potential for further utilisation of the U-238 isotope, which
forms 99.275 % of natural uranium and which all other reactor types can only use as additi-
ve. With this technology, the total worldwide electricity demand could be covered economi-
cally for several 100 years.

For sustainability reasons, it will also be needed to save resources within the nuclear fuel
supply chain. For reasons of non-proliferation of former weapon plutonium, recycling in bree-
der reactors can become a preferred choice. Therefore, France, the EU, Japan, China, Russia,
India and Korea are pursuing the long-term advancement of fast breeder technology. India
has developed a multi-stage policy involving breeders for utilising thorium deposits.

5.3 Research Demand

The “Sustainable Nuclear Energy Technology Platform” SNETP of the EU is currently compiling
the short- and medium-term research demand in the field of nuclear energy. Examples are
projects in the field of aging mechanisms, human factors, fuels, capacity increase, probabilis-
tic safety analysis, waste minimisation, proliferation resistance, structure materials, safety
proof and modelling.

21
Power Plants 2020+

Special research demand was identified in the fields of

·· Lifetime management for long-term operation up to 60 or 80 years,
·· Specifically adjusted to individual damage mechanisms for individual components,
·· Influence of fast neutrons, thermal fatigue, corrosion,
·· Safety- and accident research;
·· Further improvement of economic efficiency through
·· Further increase of unit size,
·· Higher burnups,
·· Modular/series manufacturing (short construction periods);
·· Nuclear fuel technologies,
·· Investigation of the characteristics of current cladding tube materials under
high burnup;
·· Development of innovative cladding tube materials for high burnup and higher
coolant temperatures,
·· Investigations in alternative fuel cycles (e.g. thorium);
·· Thermo hydraulics/reactor physics,
·· Improved calculation codes for thermo hydraulic/reactor physical analyses,
·· Extension of the data bases and modelling possibilities e.g. for thermo hydraulic/ reactor
physical extreme conditions (departure from nucleate boiling, neutron flux oscillation),
·· Securing of effectiveness of passive components for heat release in GEN III-reactors,
·· Investigations in the stability of boiling water reactors;
·· Materials technology,
·· Generation III:
·· Advancement of methods and concepts proving integrity of components by taking into
account, fluid characteristics and neutron radiation and material condition,
·· Generation IV:
·· Same as for fossil-fired power plants because the same material group is being
employed,
·· Development of materials with low sensitivity against neutron radiation,
·· Development of materials for hydrogen generation (iodine-/sulphur process).
The main targets of these research activities are the further improvement of plant safety as
well as improving economic efficiency, minimising remaining knowledge uncertainties as well
as providing more efficient – theoretical as well as experimental – evidence. Increased proli-
feration resistance always has to be on the agenda.

22
 Power Plants 2020+

5.4 Summary and Perspective

Development of the past years has shown that acceptance for nuclear power is lacking in
some countries although it is hardly likely that severe accidents will occur. Therefore, future
nuclear power utilisation has to strive for solutions that are proving plant safety over the
entire fuel cycle. The industrialised countries have a special function in this process and need
to take a role as technology leader.

Today, nuclear power is covering about 6 % of the worldwide energy demand, i.e. 14 % of
worldwide electricity generation. In the EU some 9 % of energy demand and 28 % of electri-
city generation are met by nuclear power. This is mainly due to its intrinsic high energy den-
sity, which is – apart from economic advantages – particularly suited to minimise the mate-
rial flow.

In the meantime it has been proven by economic studies that nuclear power will keep its
significant leading position in the worldwide electricity and heat industry when comparing
the costs with gas- and coal-fired power plants equipped with CCS as well as with renewable
sources of energy like wind and biomass.

23
Power Plants 2020+

6 Chemical Storage

6.1 Overview
Hydrogen (H2) generation by electrolysis is one approach to achieve high-capacity energy
storage. It still needs corresponding research activities. Commercial utilisation requires con-
version efficiencies that have yet only been achieved on laboratory scale.

A promising option seems to be hot electrolysis called “HotElly”, where water vapour is being
decomposed electrolytically at temperatures > 800 °C. Such a technology seems to be con-
ceivable when combining power plant and electrolysis technology on one site. In such cases
steam at 800 °C or more and at 30 bar pressure can be provided not only as agent for elec-
trolysis but also as process steam at marginal cost for heating of electrolysis cells if e.g. wind-
based electricity is missing due to calm.

Hydrogen is a highly efficient storage medium with reference to its mass unit. However, the
system efficiency of common electrolytic splitting of H2O and subsequent re-conversion into
electricity has to be clearly increased.

Apart from extending the H2 path, it is also possible to directly use surplus electricity from
renewables-based generation (i.e. without H2) for operating energy-intensive electrolysis pro-
cesses (e.g. production of caustic soda, aluminum etc.). This requires “operation” of the corre-
sponding technologies in peak- or medium load mode, which still needs to be researched and
developed. In such cases the basic substances generated are “chemical storages” instead of
hydrogen. However, the economic value of these substances has to be considered in such a
way that re-conversion into electricity, although technically possible, is not sensible in any
case. The basic substances – generated through electrolysis – are mostly subject to timely
fluctuations in demand, thus the “only” possibility is synchronisation of electricity generation
and electricity consumption on the basis of renewables.

The technical potential of chemical storages has to be investigated with priority.

6.2 Research Demand

The following options are available to minimise average CO2 emissions of electricity supply
and simultaneously to minimise grid fluctuations:
·· Hydrogen is generated as “chemical storage” by hot electrolysis using surplus renewables-
based power; research demand mainly comprises
·· Thermally-induced electrolysis´ cell elongation in order to detect and control operation
risks,
·· Supply of hot steam > 800 °C and 30 bar pressure through coal-fired steam generators
or high-temperature reactors,
·· Selection of temperature and pressure layout data in accordance with suitable materials
to maximise efficiency,
·· Maximisation of efficiency in accordance with wind power fluctuation.

24
 Power Plants 2020+

Hydrogen can be re-converted into electricity according to demand. One reconversion process
using hydrogen (H2) that has been “drafted theoretically on paper” is the combination of
SOFCs (Solid Oxide ceramic Fuel Cells) and a combined cycle process (expectation: hel ≈
70 %). Both technological steps have not yet been state of the art for the desired large-scale
size (e.g. 300 MWel).

Hydrogen is produced as a chemical base substance from surplus renewables-based power

and later utilised in other production processes (e.g. synthetisation of hydrocarbons, produc-
tion of ammonia (NH3) and/ or utilisation as reduction agent instead of CO) in order to de-
crease the “CO2 mortgage” of these secondary base substances. This, however, requires that
corresponding technologies can be operated in peak, medium or seasonal (campaign) opera-
tion. These options will have to be investigated and - if necessary - the required technical
steps would have to be identified.

The “production flexibility” yet emphasised as advantage of IGCC technology, namely the
complementary generation of electricity and hydrocarbons (especially alcohol), could only
display its full advantages if the hydrogen is generated from CO2-free electricity instead of
being produced thermo-chemically from fossil fuels. Mainly the following fields need to be
researched:
·· Gas turbine (operated with H2 and air as combustion medium) and
·· Scaling up of all steps to the required size.
The oxygen produced from electrolysis can be utilised in chemical processes or it can be of
energetic advantage in the oxyfuel process provided it will be possible to re-convert H 2 in a
gas turbine of the IGCC process with air. One example for chemical process application of O2
is its utilisation in steel production processes.

In total the storage potential of these technologies could be equal to the capacity of pump
storage plants.

6.3 Research Demand for ‘Chemical Storages‘ other than H2

Due to its physical properties, hydrogen is not the optimum seasonal storage; the possibilities
mentioned above, i.e. conversion into substances that can be easily liquefied like methane,
methanol or ammonia, would have to be applied if longer periods (e.g. from winter to summer
months) should be compensated. Corresponding technologies are already available today;
however, questions typical for power grid control like storage capacity and load change cha-
racteristics of corresponding systems would have to be investigated and made available.
Besides, its efficiency with reference to H2 and the energy needed for its production would
have to be improved.

Particularly attractive seems to be ammonia (NH3) as chemical storage medium because con-
trary to methane and methanol it uses nitrogen instead of carbon to bind hydrogen. Thus, no
CO2 can occur when re-converting the storage medium into electricity.

Ammonia disposes of a high storage density and is an excellent option as basic chemical. This
applies in particular to the field of ammonia production as artificial fertilizer. Fertilizer

25
Power Plants 2020+

production from hydrogen and nitrogen is technically mature (“Haber-Bosch procedure”) and
is being applied worldwide on a large scale (2,000 t/day = 500 MW energy equivalent). The
high reaction temperature is even advantageous because waste heat at this temperature level
can be better utilised in connection with power plant processes than e.g. in methanol
production.

Decomposition (“combustion”) of ammonia into nitrogen and hydrogen is probably the most
ambitious step of hydrogen storage technology, because the conventional process step causes
considerable nitrogen oxide formation. Even with the aid of a catalyst, ammonia is only de-
composed at higher temperatures (> 500 °C) (SCO process: “Selective Catalytic Oxidation”)
thus requiring downstream SCR technology (SCR: “Selective Catalytic Reduction”) in order to
reduce NOx emissions. Therefore, it is desirable to convert ammonia into electrical energy
using fuel cells. Research has already yielded high-temperature fuel cells (SOFC) enabling
conversion of ammonia chemical energy into electricity on a laboratory scale. Besides, rese-
arch activities are under way aiming at the electrolytic decomposition of ammonia. Another
promising approach is autothermal catalytic cracking of ammonia with a small portion of the
ammonia being combusted in order to cover the energy demand of the cracking.

It can be concluded that the utilisation of ammonia as hydrogen storage is mainly realised by
large-scale proven technologies that can be easily adjusted to meet demands of hydrogen
storage. Research demand particularly exists to increase efficiency in the field of high-pres-
sure ammonia synthesis.

The following issues should be investigated primarily concerning the re-conversion of ammo-
nia for electricity:
·· Decomposition of ammonia at low temperatures,
·· Autothermal ammonia reformation,
·· Ammonia fuel cell.

If ammonia-based re-conversion into power can or has to be dispensed with because of too
high costs, short- and medium-term surplus wind power can contribute to improve other CO2
emission balances of different industrial processes. Therefore, such processes have to be ana-
lysed and to be opened up, i.e. processes that consume in the short term considerable amounts
of electricity and will produce a storable base material (e.g. production of caustic soda, chlo-
rine, aluminum production).

6.4 Localisation of ‘Chemical Storages‘ in the European Net and Feed-in of

Regenerative Energy
The options outlined above can preferably be realised on large chemical sites that mostly
have an own power plant at their site and are employed within the scope of co-generation as
base load plant providing medium pressure process steam. Such a power plant type is able to
supply all year round medium pressures and temperatures needed for chemical synthesis.
Energy is favourably transferred via High-Voltage Direct Current HVDC. Among others, first
wind parks are equipped with this technology and connected to the electrical grid.

26
 Power Plants 2020+

In addition to conventional HVDC with grid-connected converter and overhead power lines
HVDC with self-controlled converters and polymer cables will have to be used. The connec-
tion of off-shore wind plants requires seabed cable lines stretching over tens to several hun-
dreds of kilometres.

Currently HVDC technology with self-controlled converters and polymer cables is available up
to 1,000 MW and slightly above 300 kV voltage. Cables are much more accepted by the public
than overhead power lines, thus making it easier to find routes. However, the costs of cable
lines are very much higher than the expenses for overhead power lines.

A number of research issues have to be settled in connection with electrolysis systems and
their integration into the existing structure:
·· Grid connection of a site and assessment of the transmission losses over distance,
·· Adapting the very high voltages of 300 kV to electrolysis cells voltages of some 1.2 V,
·· Controllability of the entire system,
·· Feed-in of residual energy if only a part is electrolysed,
·· Dimensioning and design of the entire system.

All steps outlined jointly have the potential to form the basis for new plants to be erected
after 2020.

27
Power Plants 2020+

Members of the VGB Scientific Advisory Board (June 2010)

Chairman:
Dr. Johannes Lambertz
Chairman of the Board,
RWE Power AG, Essen
Germany

Vice Chairman:
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Eberhard Roos
Stuttgart University
Department of Mechanical Engineering
State Materials Testing Institute (MPA)
Germany

Members:

Prof. Dr. Christina Berger

Technical University Darmstadt
Chair and Institute for Materials Science (IfW)
Germany

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Hans-Jörg Bauer

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Institute for Thermal Fluid Machinery
Germany

Prof. Tadeusz Chmielniak

Silesian University of Technology
Institute of Machines and Power Generation
Poland

Prof. Dr. William D’Haeseleer

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Energy Institute
Belgium

Prof. Dr. Kim Dam-Johansen

Technical University of Denmark
Dept. of Chemical Engineering
Denmark

Prof. Dr. Bernd Epple

Darmstadt Technical University
Department for Energy Systems and Energy Engineering
Germany

Prof. Dr. Hans Fahlenkamp

Dortmund University
Faculty for Bio- and Chemical Engineering
Chair for Environmental Engineering
Germany

28
 Power Plants 2020+

Prof. Dr. Klaus Görner

University Duisburg-Essen
Chair of Environmental Process Engineering and Plant Design
Germany

Prof. Dr. Markus Haider

Technical University Vienna
Institute for Energy Systems and Thermodynamics
Austria

Prof. Dr. Thomas Hartkopf

TU Darmstadt
Institute of Electrical Energy Systems
Department of Renewable Energies
Germany

Prof. Dr. Antonio Hurtado

Technical University Dresden
Institute for Energy Engineering
Chair for Hydrogen- and Nuclear Technology
Germany

Prof. Dr. Mikko Hupa

Abo Akademi Process Chemistry Centre
Combustion and Materials Chemistry
Finland

Prof. Dr. Johannes Janicka

Technical University Darmstadt
Mechanical and Process Engineering
Department of Energy and Power Plant Engineering
Germany

Prof. Emmanouil Kakaras

National Technical University of Athens
Laboratory of Steam Boilers and Thermal Plants
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Greece

Prof. Dr. Alfons Kather

Technical University Hamburg-Harburg
Institute of Energy Systems
Department of Thermal Power Plants and Marine Engines
Germany

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Reinhold Kneer

RWTH Aachen University
Energy and Process Engineering
Germany

29
Power Plants 2020+

Prof. Dr. Hans-Joachim Krautz

Brandenburg Technical University Cottbus
Chair Power Plant Engineering
Germany

Prof. Dr. Reinhard Leithner

Technical University Braunschweig
Institute for Heat- and Fuel-Technology
Germany

Prof. Dr. Bernd Meyer

Technical University Bergakademie Freiberg
Chair Energy Process Technology and Thermal Residues Treatment
Germany

Prof. Dr. Günter Scheffknecht

Stuttgart University
Institute of Process Engineering and Power Plant Technology
Germany

Prof. Dr. Viktor Scherer

Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Department of Energy Plant Technology
Germany

Dr. Mihael Sekavcnik

University of Ljubljana
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Slovenia
Germany

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Hartmut Spliethoff

Technical University Munich
Institute of Energy Systems
Germany

Prof. Dr.-Ing. George Tsatsaronis

Technical University Berlin
Institute of Energy Technology
Energy Technology and Environmental Protection
Germany

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Weber

Rostock University
Institute of Electrical Power Engineering
Germany

30
 Power Plants 2020+

VGB Offices:

Dr.-Ing. Karl Theis

VGB PowerTech e.V.
Essen · Germany

Dr.-Ing. Ludger Mohrbach

VGB PowerTech e.V.
Essen · Germany

31
Power Plants 2020+

Members of the Editorial Committee “Power Plants 2020+”

Dr. Johannes Lambertz

Chairman of the Board
RWE Power AG, Essen
Germany

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Eberhard Roos

Stuttgart University
Department of Mechanical Engineering
State Materials Testing Institute (MPA)
Germany

Prof. Dr. Hans Fahlenkamp

Dortmund University
Faculty for Bio- and Chemical Engineering
Chair for Environmental Engineering
Germany

Prof. Dr. Klaus Görner

Duisburg-Essen University
Chair of Environmental Process Engineering and Plant Design
Germany

Prof. Dr. Markus Haider

Technical University Vienna
Institute for Energy Systems and Thermodynamics
Austria
Germany

Prof. Dr. Antonio Hurtado

Technical University Dresden
Institute for Energy Engineering
Chair for Hydrogen- and Nuclear Technology
Germany

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Weber

Rostock University
Institute of Electrical Power Engineering
Germany

Dr.-Ing. Karl Theis

VGB PowerTech e.V.
Essen · Germany

Dipl.-Ing. Ulrich Langnickel

VGB PowerTech e.V.
Essen · Germany

Dr.-Ing. Ludger Mohrbach

VGB PowerTech e.V.
Essen · Germany

32
VGB Scientific Advisory Board
Klinkestraße 27–31 · 45136 Essen · Germany
www.vgb.org
E-Mail: info@vgb.org